tracking expenditure for hiv and aids in africa ~ cross-country comparisons guthrie, t., kioko, u....
TRANSCRIPT
Tracking Expenditure for HIV and AIDS in Africa ~
Cross-Country Comparisons
Guthrie, T., Kioko, U.Inaugural Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association
Accra - Ghana, 10th - 12th March 2009PS 04/8
Objectives•Determine the total flows of financing and
expenditures for HIV/AIDS, from all international and public (domestic) sources of financing
•To identify the flow of expenditures by sources, agent, providers of services activities, and target population
•To make recommendations for improved efficiency and prioritization of HIV and AIDS spending, and for improved financial information systems.
Methodology• Review of UNGASS Indicator 1 for SSA
countries (Source: UNAIDS Global Report 2008 Annex2)• Review of Country NASA Reports for further
detail: Ghana, Botswana, Zambia, Swaziland• National AIDS Spending Assessment is an
approach to comprehensively measure:▫All spending for HIV/AIDS▫From all sources, through agents, providers,
activities to beneficiaries▫From a multi-sectoral perspective▫According to interventions reflected in the NSPs▫Allows countries to monitor their own progress
towards the national and international commitments.
• Acknowledgements to UNAIDS, the NACs and NASA team members for access to their data
SSA Low Income Countries HIV Prevalence (%) and Spending per Capita on HIV/AIDS (2006, in current US$)
Per Capita HIV/AIDS Spending (current US$) & HIV Prevalence (%) in Middle Income SSA Countries (2006)
Public Spending Categories (2003-2005)
0
100,000,000
200,000,000
300,000,000
400,000,000
500,000,000
600,000,000
700,000,000
800,000,000
900,000,000
1,000,000,000
2003 2004 2005
Pul
a
FN 8..HIV- and AIDS-Related Research
FN 7..Community Development &Enhanced Environment
FN 6..Social mitigation
FN 5..Human Resources for HIV andAIDS activities
FN 4..Prog.Devmt & HSS strengthening
FN 3..Orphans and Vulnerable Children(OVC)
FN 2..Treatment and care components Total
FN 1..Prevention Programmes
Botswana ~ Public Trends Botswana ~ Public Trends (Pula, 2003-2005)(Pula, 2003-2005)
Swaziland ~ HIV/AIDS Priorities by Source of Funds (SZL, 2006)
-
50,000,000
100,000,000
150,000,000
200,000,000
250,000,000
300,000,000
350,000,000
400,000,000
Public funds Internationalfunds
Total
Sources of funds
SZL
HIV and AIDS realatedresearch(Excluding operationalresearch)Enabling Environment and CommunityDevelopment
Social Protection and Social Services(EXCLUDING OVC)
Human Resources' recruitments andRetention Incentive - Human Capital
ProgrammeManagement andadministration strengthening
OVC
Care and Treatments
Prevention
Swaziland ~ funds for Programme Management by NERCHA (SZL, 2006)
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
Other sources toNERCHA
GFATM toNERCHA
TOTAL
SOURCES OF FUNDS
SZL
Upgrading and construction ofinfrastructure not elsewhereclassified (n.e.c)
Upgrading laboratoryinfrastructure and new equipment
Serological-surveillance(Serosurveillance)
Monitoring and evaluation
Planning and coordination
Transaction costs
Programme Administration
Swaziland Prevention Spending (SZL, 05/06-06/07)
-
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
2005/ 2006 2006/ 2007
YEAR
SZL
Prevention activities not elsewhere classified (n.e.c.)
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)
Blood safety
Prevention of mother-to-child transmission(PMTCT)
Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of sexuallytransmitted infections (STI) (Improving managementof STI) Public and commercial sector condom provision
Prevention programmes in the workplace
Prevention of HIV transmission aimed at personsliving with HIV (PLHA)
Prevention - Youth out-of-school
Prevention - Youth in school
Risk-reduction for vulnerable and specialpopulations (Programmes for vulnerable and specialpopulations)Voluntary counselling and testing
Community mobilization
Communication for social and behavioral change
Preventio
n
CommMob
l
VCT
CondomsPMTCTBlood Safety
Swaziland ~ Social Protection spending (SZL, 05/06-06/07)
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
2005/ 2006 2006/ 2007
YEAR
SZL
Social protection services and social servicesnot elsewhere classified (n.e.c)
HIV-specific income generation projects
Social protection through provision of socialservices
Social protection through in-kind benefits
Social protection through monetary benefits
Swazi~ environment and community development spending (SZL, 2006/07)
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
Public Funds International funds Total
SOURCES OF FUNDS
SZL
Enabling environment and communitydevelopment not elsewhere classified(n.e.c)
AIDS-specific programmes focused onwomen
AIDS-specific Institutional Development
Human rights
Advocacy and strategic communication
Recommendations•Need for more sustainable predictable
financing for HIV/AIDS and health•Need for increasing public agents ie. Control
of funds ~ through common funds, DBS, IHPs.•LNGOs playing important role in delivery of
HIV/AIDS services ~ need to be supported through efficient funding mechanisms
•Treatment requiring increasing share of financing, prevention and other interventions requiring increasing, especially mitigation and social protection activities
Recommendations cont.
• Increase public funds for enabling environment esp. Promotion and protection of human rights
• Improve output indicators to enable beneficiary incidence analysis
• Increase funds for MARPs and vulnerable groups
• Increase HSS funding and mechanisms (eg.IHPs) and increase allocations to HIV/AIDS activities that contribute to general HSS (eg. Blood safety, laboratories, upgrading facilities)
Recommendations cont.• Increasing alignment with NSPs, but some
donors still have own agenda, own systems ~ need harmonisation
• Increase absorptive capacity:▫Reduce donor ‘dumping’ of funds at the end
of the financial year▫ Improve predictability of donor commitments,
over longer period▫Increase speed of disbursements, reduce
tedious systems, while improving public accountability systems
▫ Improve public programmatic and human resource capacity to deliver services
Recommendations cont.• Improve public financial reporting &
information systems•Routine resource tracking ~ institutionalise
NASA in M&E systems•Harmonise to 1 national system for
reporting on commitments, disbursements & spending
•Civil society play greater role in monitoring public spending & in sharing their own spending activities
•Critical to have good financial monitoring systems in place before implementing IHPs etc.
Thank YouTeresa GuthrieCentre for Economic Governance and AIDS in
Africa Email: [email protected]: +27-21-425-2852Cell: +27-82-872-4694