tracing soil organic matter from source to sink · 2013. 8. 14. · tracing soil organic matter...
TRANSCRIPT
Tracing soil organic matter from source to sink
Jung-Hyun Kim1,*, Claudia Zell1, Patricia Moreira-Turcq2, Marcela Andrea Pérez3, David Hollander4, Dorthe KlitgaardKristensen5, Roselyne Buscail6, Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté1
1Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), The Netherlands, 2IRD-LMTG-HYBAM, France, 3UFAM, Brazil, 4University of South Florida, USA, 5Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway, 6CEFREM-CNRS UMR 5110, France, y, ,
1. Introduction:The transport of terrestrial organic matter (OM) to coastal sediments representsa significant flux in the global carbon cycle. Although a large range of bulk andmolecular proxies for terrestrial OM is available, quantification of the relativeinputs of terrestrial OM to marine sediments is still difficult. The incompleteunderstanding of the transfer of terrestrial OM from land to the ocean isprobably due to the lack of diagnostic (geochemical) proxies especially for soilOM hi h t f t thi d f th t t l t t i l b b d t R tl
I.
O
OO
O
OH
O
O
OH
O
O
OH
II.
Branched versus Isoprenoid Tetraether
(BIT) index:
*E-mail: [email protected]
OM which accounts for two third of the total terrestrial carbon budget. Recently,several developments have however led to new insights into the recognition ofsoil OM in marine environments. The Branched and Isoprenoid Tetraether (BIT)index (Hopmans et al., 2004, Fig. 1) has been introduced as a proxy to trace soilOM input from land to the marine environments (e.g. Walsh et al., 2008; Kim etal., 2009). This index is based on the relative abundance of non-isoprenoidalglycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) versus a structurally relatedisoprenoid GDGT “crenarchaeol”. Branched GDGTs are produced by anaerobicbacteria thriving in soils (Weijers et al., 2006), whereas crenarchaeol isproduced predominantly by marine Crenarchaeota (Sinninghe Damsté et al.,2002). We discuss the use of the BIT index to trace soil OM input in contrastingdepositional settings: the Rhone prodelta (NW Mediterranean), the fjords of
O
OH
O
O
OH
O
O
OH
O
O
O
O
OH
OH
III.
IV.Approaching 0 → marine dominated organic matterApproaching 1 → soil dominated organic matter
[I + II + III]
[I + II + III + IV]
Fig. 1. Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGT) structures and the definition of theBIT index. I, II, and III indicate the branched GDGTs and IV is crenarchaeol.p g p ( ), j
Svalbard (Arctic Ocean), and the Amazon shelf and fan (tropical Atlantic).
2. Results:
Amazon shelf & fan (tropical Atlantic):
0.90 (n = 1)0.85 (n = 45)
Têt
0.78 (n = 1)
0.72 (n = 1)
AudeAgly
Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean):
Latit
ude
0
10
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Le
vel (
cm)
High water level (June 2005)
Fjords of Svalbard (Arctic Ocean):
LB KLB
MB
TB
B
A
0.8
1.0
(0.96±0.05, n=15)
Fig. 2. We investigated suspended particulate matter (SPM) collectedin the Rhône River and its tributeries (Doubs, Saône, Ain, Isère, andDurance) and other smaller Mediterranean rivers. BIT values of theRhône River are comparable to those of its tributaries. The BIT valueof the Rhône River at Arles (0.9, n=1) is higher than those of smallerMediterranean rivers flowing into the Gulf of Lions.
43 5
44.0
1
44.0
0.4
A Bbranched GDGTs BIT index
Rhône RiverRhône River
Water depth Altitude (m)
Longitude
-80 -70 -60 -50
-10
Fig. 6. Sampling locations of soil (O) and SPM in the red box in theAmazon basin. The SPM samples were collected during the highwater level in June, 2005.
0
100
200
300
400
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J
Water Cycle
Wa
ter
L
Amazon River
Fig. 4. (A) Map of the Arctic Ocean. (B) Sampling locations of marinesurface sediment (O), IRD (), soil (), and coal (). LB, KLB, MB,TB, KB, and KV indicate Lilliehöökbreen, Kollerbreen, Mayerbreen,Tinayrebreen, Kongsbreen, and Kongvegen, respectively. The BITindex of Svalbard soils was close to, as is typically found for soils. BITvalues of IRD were much lower while those of marine sediments
12°00'E11°00'E
79°10'N
79°00'N
Kongsfjord
Kross
fjord
Ny-Ålesund
KB
KVCoal
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
BIT
inde
x
Soil Coal IRD Marine sediment
nd
(0.44±0.06, n=4)
(0.02±0.02, n=29)
0 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
BIT
index 0.97±0.03
(n=21)0.93±0.03
(n=10) 0.84±0.09 (n=15)
79.0
79.2
79.4
Latit
ude
Latit
ude
C:N ratio
-25
-24
-23
-22
4
5
6
7
8
79.0
79.2
79.4
0
20
40
60
80ReteneC
0
40
80
120
160
A
Ny-Ålesund
Ny-Ålesund
Ny-Ålesund
Ny-Ålesund
B
D
D
December, 2003
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
42.0
42.5
43.0
43.5
0
5
10
15
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
42.0
42.5
43.0
43.5
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
Latit
ude
(N)
Lat
itude
(N
)
0.0
Têt RiverTêt River
Rhône River
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
42.0
42.5
43.0
43.5
44.0
0
10
30
50
70
90
100
(%)
C Soil percentage
Têt River
Rhône River
(g
g TO
C-1
)
Fig. 7. The BIT values of soils are close to 1. BIT values of river bedsediments are also high, while those of river SPM are generally lower,varying among different tributaries.
values of IRD were much lower, while those of marine sedimentswere generally low.
n-alkane
13Corg
0.0
Soil River bed sediment June SPM
Rio Negro
Rio SolimõesRio Madeira
Rio Tapajós
Rio Amazonas
Rio Trombetas
Obidos
0.92±0.0 (n=4)
0.90±0.0 (n=3)
0.74±0.01 (n=2)
0.59 (n=1)
0.87 (n=1)
0.81±0.02 (n=4)
6
g g
OC
-1)
g g
OC
-1)
‰V
PD
B)
79.0
79.2
79.4
Latit
ude
E Branched GDGTs
0
1
2
3
4
BIT
LongitudeLongitude
Latit
ude
10.5 11 11.5 12 12.510.5 11 11.5 12 12.5
79.0
79.2
79.4Ancient OMMarine OM
0
20
40
60
80
Ny-Ålesund Ny-Ålesund
BIT index
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
F
Ny-Ålesund Ny-Ålesund
HG
0
20
40
60
80
4. Future work:We will continue to work on soils and SPM collected in theAmazon watershed and marine surface sediments as well as
Longitude (E) Longitude (E)
Fig. 3. In the Gulf of Lions, BIT values range from 0.01 to 0.85, withhigher values along the coast compared to those offshore. The soilOM contributions to the total organic carbon (TOC), estimated basedon the BIT index, are >10% along the coast, while those from theouter shelf and the continental slope are below 10% (Kim et al.,2010). The spatial distribution patterns of GDGT parameters aresimilar to the MODIS image of the Gulf of Lions showing across andalong-shelf dispersion of the river plumes occurred in December,2003 (Guillén et al., 2006).
Fig. 5. Bulk geochemical parameters suggest a predominant marine
BIT
ind
ex
-54 -52 -50 -48 -46 -44 -42-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Lat
itude
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
g g
OC
-1)(%
)
(%)
Amazon watershed and marine surface sediments as well asSPM sampled in the Amazon shelf and fan. GDGTparameters will be compared with other geochemicalparameters. This will further shed light on the potential of theBIT index for tracing soil OM input from land to the ocean andquantifying its fluxes.
Reference:Hopmans, E.C., J.W.H. Weijers, E. Schefuß, L. Herfort, J.S. Sinninghe Damsté, and S. Schouten, A novel proxy for terrestrial organic matter in sediments based on branched and isoprenoidtetraether lipids. Earth Planet.
Sci. Lett. 224, 107-116, 2004.Kim, J.-H., B. Zarzycka, R. Buscail, F. Peters, J. Bonnin, W. Ludwig, S. Schouten, and J.S. Sinninghe Damsté, Factors controlling the Branched Isoprenoid Tetraether (BIT) Contribution of river-borne soil organic carbon to
the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Limnol. Oceanogr.,55, 507–518, 2010.Walsh, E.M., A.E. Ingalls, and R.G. Keil. Sources and transport of terrestrial organic matter in Vancouver Island fjords and the Vancouver-Washington Margin: A multiproxy approach using d13Corg, lignin phenols, and the
ether lipid BIT index. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 1054-1063, 2008.Sinninghe Damsté, J.S., E.C. Hopmans, S. Schouten, A.C.T. van Duin, and J.A.J. Geenevasen, Crenarchaeol: the characteristic core glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether membrane lipid of cosmopolitan pelagic
crenarchaeota. J. Lipid Res., 43, 1641-1651, 2002.Weijers, J.W.H., S. Schouten, E.C. Hopmans, J.A.J. Geenevasen, O.R.P. David, J.M. Coleman, R.D. Pancost, and J.S. Sinninghe Damsté, Membrane lipids of mesophilic anaerobic bacteria thriving in peats have typical
archaeal traits. Environ. Microbiol., 8, 648-657, 2006.
Fig. 8. The BIT values of marine sediments collected in the Amazonfan in 2010 are generally around 0.1, except for three sites withenhanced values (0.4-0.8). This suggests that deposition orpreservation of soil organic matter are higher at those sites located onthe continental shelf and slope.
Acknowledgement:We thank to J. Ossebaar. M. Kienhuis, and E. Hopmans (NIOZ) for analytical support. Thanks also go to V.Willmott, F. Peterse, N. Koç, other participants, and the crew of the SciencePub International Polar Yearcruises on the R/V Lance from the Norwegian Polar Institute. This study was carried out within the ERCPACEMAKER (Past Continental Climate Change: Temperatures from Marine and Lacustrine Archives) and ERGSOURCE (Tracing Amazon soil organic carbon input from land to the ocean) projects. This work was alsosupported by the CARBAMA (Carbon biogeochemistry and atmospheric exchanges in the Amazon Riversystem), the CHACCRA (Climate and Human induced Alterations in Carbon Cycling at the River-seAconnection), and EXTREMA (Episodes météo-climatiques extrêmes et redistribution des massessédimentaires et des polluants associés au sein d'un système côtier) projects funded by the French NationalResearch Agency.
contribution to sedimentary OM. The BIT index indicates that soil OMcontribution to the marine sediments is minor. However, theparameters of retene, n-alkanes, and the depleted bulk radiocarboncontent (14C value) suggest that ancient OM of both coal-derivedand mature IRD-derived OM is being buried in the Kongsfjord-Krossfjord system of Svalbard in the high Arctic.
Longitude