TPSSLeader & Teacher SLTs

2013-2014 School Year

Component Evaluation for Teachers Evaluation for School Leaders

Setting Goals Teachers set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator

Leaders set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator

Focusing on Practice Uses NIET / TAP Rubric to help prioritize instructional activities that will increase student outcomes and identify teacher strengths and areas for development

Uses three domains that help prioritize leadership activities that will increase student outcomes and identify leaders strengths and areas for development

Formal Feedback Cycles Minimum two observations Minimum two site visits

Evaluation Measures Weighted 50% Professional Practice and 50% Student Outcomes

Weighted 50% Professional Practice and 50% Student Outcomes

Final Evaluations Based on five-point scale to be entered into CODE (converted to four point scale)

Based on four-point scale to be entered into HCIS

The Teacher and Leader Evaluations work together to increase educator effectiveness and student outcomes.

Goals for school leaders should set a vision for what students should be able to

accomplish by the year’s end.

Goals for school leaders should:

• Tie into your district-wide goals• Drive a leader’s daily work• Align to teachers’ goals• Help students be college and

career ready

District Goals Based on 8 Critical Goals

Leader SLTs

• Grades 3 – 8 schools:– One must be based on percentage from chart of all

tested grades and subjects.• Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and iLeap tests, 70%

(210 of 300)the students will score proficient or above.

– One must be based on moving at least 30%(60 of 200) students who score unsatisfactory or approaching basic up one level. • Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and iLeap tests, 30% of

the students that scored unsatisfactory or approaching basic on the previous year’s test will score one level higher.

Leader SLTs

• Grades 9 - 12 schools (examples for C school):– One must be based on percentage from chart of all

EOC tested subjects.• Example: On the Spring 2014 EOC tests, 64% of the

students will score good or excellent.

– One must be based on having a certain percentage of Juniors score 18 or higher on the March 2014 ACT assessment. • Example: On the March 2014 state-wide administration

of the ACT test, 50% of the Juniors taking the test will score 18 or higher.

Leader SLTs• Grades K-2 schools (examples for C school):

– One must be based on percentage from chart of all Dibels tested grades at the school.• Example: On the End of the Year Dibels Next assessment, 64% of

the students will be at benchmark.

– For schools with a 2nd grade, one must be based on the DBT:• Example: On the End of Year District Benchmark mathematics test

in 2nd grade, the school average will be 80%.

– For schools without a 2nd grade, leaders can choose to do a math goal using Aimsweb or another Dibels goal focusing on lowering the number of students intensive to below 10%. • Example: On the End of Year Aimsweb math assessment, 80% of

the students will score proficient.

School Leaders will set their Student Learning Target Goals using the State Averages for Schools in their Category or District Guidance when available.

See charts on upcoming slides.

Average Percentage of Students Scoring Basic or Above on LEAP/iLEAP (2010-11)

A Schools 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th ELA 98 100 99 100 100 100Math 98 100 97 99 100 99Science 97 97 97 97 100 98Social Studies 96 98 99 98 99 100Totals 97 99 98 99 100 99

B Schools 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th ELA 86 93 87 88 88 86Math 88 92 87 89 89 84Science 86 88 85 86 84 83Social Studies 81 89 86 86 85 88Totals 85 91 86 87 87 85

C Schools 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th ELA 77 86 78 80 79 81Math 82 84 79 82 79 77Science 78 79 76 78 75 76Social Studies 74 79 78 79 76 80Totals 78 82 78 80 77 79

D Schools 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th ELA 65 73 66 64 64 63Math 68 70 65 67 67 59Science 61 60 55 59 59 55Social Studies 60 63 60 59 62 64Totals 64 67 62 62 63 60

F Schools 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th ELA 49 50 50 49 45 41Math 51 52 52 55 49 41Science 46 41 34 38 39 28Social Studies 43 44 50 43 44 39Totals 47 47 47 46 44 37

Average EOC Proficiency (Good or Excellent) Rates (11-12)

(English III and US History are estimates based on recent district performance)

A Schools Algebra I Geometry English II Biology English III US History

Average of all

100 96 98 96 75 70 89

B Schools Algebra I Geometry English II Biology English III US History

Average of all

80 66 82 71 65 60 71

C Schools Algebra I Geometry English II Biology English III US History

Average of All

70 58 73 62 55 50 61

D Schools Algebra I Geometry English II Biology English III US History

Average of All

60 45 63 45 45 40 50

F Schools Algebra I Geometry English II Biology English III US History

Average of All

28 25 41 25 35 30 31

District Goal A Schools B Schools C Schools D Schools F Schools

50 70 60 50 40 30

Dibels Next Goals

% Benchmark on the EOY Dibels Test

A Schools K 90%1st 80%2nd 80%

B Schools K 80%1st 70%2nd 70%

C Schools K 70%1st 60%2nd 60%

D or F SchoolsK 60%1st 50%2nd 50%F SchoolsK 50%1st 40%2nd 40%

Scale for other non-tested grades and subjects

• D or F schools: average of 70%• C schools: average of 80%• B schools: average of 90%• A schools: average of 100%

*based on the fact that A schools are expected to have 100% of their students proficient.

Formula for Achievement Rangeswith 70% as the Goal

Insufficient Attainment is any result below Partial Attainment. (1 point)Below 54%Partial Attainment is a range from 15% below the target to just below

the actual SLT. (2 points)54%-69%START HERE: Full Attainment is a range from the actual SLT up to 15%

above the target. (3 points)70% - 85%Exceptional Attainment is any result above the Full Attainment range.

This range should represent more than a year’s worth of growth. (4 points)

Above 85%

Example Scoring Range with 77% as the goal.

61% or less of students will score Basic or above

62% - 76% of students will score Basic or above

77% - 92% of students will score Basic or above

93% or more of students will score Basic or above

-15% from goal +15% from goal

SLT Writing Process for Teachers

• Step 1: The school leader sets goals and provides guidance to teachers regarding assessments and goals to use.• Goals must be set using Tier 1 assessments when available and/or

using the same assessments that the leader used to set their goals. •When Tier 1 assessments are not available or the leader goals do not

include the content of the course (i.e. physical education), goals must be set using the most rigorous and reliable assessments available. • A teacher made test should not be used as the posttest when other

assessments are available (see assessment chart). •When possible, one goal should be for all of the students a teacher

teachers and the other goal should focus on moving lower performing students to proficient.

Student Learning TargetsDue Dates

September 13: Directors, Supervisors, and Coordinators

September 30: Principal Deadline

October 31: Teacher Deadline

Resources

District SLT website (C&I Webpage):http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531