towards the de-institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

11
Panel 1 Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance? Brian D. Loader Bologna - 8 aprile 2009

Upload: io-partecipo

Post on 05-Dec-2014

338 views

Category:

News & Politics


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Speech by Brian D. Loader - University of York - at the conference “E-democracy 2.0. Istituzioni, cittadini, nuove reti: un lessico possibile” [Bologna, 8 aprile 2009].

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Panel 1Towards the de-Institutionalisation

of e-democratic governance?

Brian D. Loader

Bologna - 8 aprile 2009

Page 2: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Web 2.0 & de-institutionalization?

New media often brings huge optimism about its democratising potential.

Web 2.0 - user-generated content, mass collaboration & sharing of intellectual property - is latest example.

I want to suggest that new media may facilitate a trend of de-institutionalization but that it does not determine a democratic future.

Rather new media techonologies should themselves be seen a sphere of contestation between competing conceptions of democracy.

Page 3: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

What kind of democracy are we talking about?

• Discussions about how ICTs can/cannot democratise our political systems are too often conducted in a vacuum -institutional change is influenced from without!

• Different models produce different objectives/evaluations

• Two competing perspectives -1. Participatory models2. Liberal models

Latter, as neo-liberalism, has dominated the shape of e-democracy

Page 4: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Mediated Democracy?

•State - e-government- re-connecting citizens- surveillance state

•Civil Society- re-energizing democracy?- Community Politics Online?- Social movements online- Web 2.0 a new public sphere?

Page 5: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

E-Government?

- Neo-liberal response to major environmental challenges to post-war Liberal-Welfare-States

-Re-engineering Government? Networked Informational organisations

-Privatisation of public info systems

-de-professionalisation

- Welfare Direct - remote control of populations

Page 6: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Re-Connecting Citizens?

Or customer market research?

Page 7: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Surveillance State?

•Joined-up government - e-government efficiencies

•National databases

•National ID cards

•CCTV

•Politics of fear – security, terrorism, cybercrime, cyberwar

Page 8: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Civil Society:re-energizing democracy?

•Political Parties Online•Campaigning•E-voting•But…ease of voting does not necessarily lead to active engagement, commitment, democractic learning.

Page 9: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Community Politics Online?

Community Informatics/Community Networking local democratic politics•Social Sorting•Splintering Urbanisation and premium spaces

•Fragmentation of civil society preventing deliberation

Page 10: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Social Movements Online?

For many the most important means to develop participatorydemocracy

Page 11: Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?

Web 2.0 a new public sphere?

The lastest battleground for contested notions of democracy

Participatory e-democracy?- User generated content - citizen journalists- Mass Collaboration- Sharing culture & democratic practices emerging?Liberal democracy- dataveillance - state captures user-generated content?- Little brothers watching?- Social movements will have to compete harder in media-

saturated world.