towards bridging the gap between ?· towards bridging the gap between peopleand the constitution:...


Post on 08-Sep-2018




0 download

Embed Size (px)




    P. lshwara Bhat*


    It can be seen from the Report of the National Commission to Reviewthe Working of the Constitution (NCRWC), 2002, that the Commission carriedout an impressive social science discourse of the whole constitutionalexperience with a responsibility of national level self-introspection rather thanconfining to a lawyer's law analysis. A prominent theme exhorted by theCommission is enhancing the participative role of the people in working theConstitution and strengthening the constitutional orientation for humandevelopment, welfare and harmony. The present paper focuses on this facet ofthe agenda given by a national body. Before launching into this exercise, someelaboration on the linkage of the Constitution with people is appropriate.

    A Constitution is enacted at a landmark stage of nation's life, and reflectsthe major policy choices of the political society. It is a system of enduringvalues and a design to approach immortality as nearly as human institutionscan approach1. People are the ultimate makers of the Constitution for mouldingtheir destiny and by reflecting their collective determination for reform. Assaid by Chief Justice Marshall, " It is the creature of their will, and lives onlyby their will." Success of a Constitution depends much upon the constantand organized support from the people. Since the live veins of society shouldnourish a state founded on the Constitution, it is to the society's organicsolidarity that one should look for its means of success2 People not only feelbut also think about the quality of the governance to which they are subjected.Hence, their role is not confined to the task of mere voting. Although they maynot be good judges of legislative proposals because of lack of expert politicalintelligence to foresee the effects, any exclusion of them from the informationprocess relating to policy making or from the task of policy implementationwould obstruct the polity's attainments3 According to Lord Irvine of Lairg,"Constitutional paramountcy reflects the notion of social compact, of apopulation which is engaged in the political process, and upon whose license

    * Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri,Mysore.1. Justice John Marshal in Cohens v. Wrginia,. 6 Wheaton 264, 5 L. Ed.257 (1821)2. B. A. Masodkar, Society State and the Law,(Bombay:N.M.Tripathi,1979)pp.x to xii3. See C.S.Emden, The People And The Constitution, Second Ed. (Oxford:

    Clarendon Press 1959) pp.312-314; for the proposition that this enhances legitimacy and contractarianperspective of the Constitution and enables transformation of self-interest into collective interest in theprocess of making constitutional choices, see Dennis C.Muller, Constitutional Democracy, New York:Oxford University Press, 1996 pp.60-69

  • 132 NALSAR Law Review [Vol.2: No.1

    the continued existence of the institutions of government depends. Thus itinvokes the idea of participatory democracy."4

    The Constitution of India has been a product of national consensus onthe method of governing the country with a commitment to the enduring valuesof democracy, human rights, social justice, and national unity. The preamble'sinvocation of popular p'ower - We the People of India-symbolizes continuousmass support to the values and works under the Constitution and solemncommitment to the constructive politics of welfare and unity. Over the lastfifty years of crucial constitutional developments, people have identifiedthemselves with the Constitution, internalized its values in their conduct andexpectations, and contributed to its fruitful working. Constitutional values havebecollle part of their culture, a new dharmashastra for public life5 It provideda system that could hold the multicultural society together even at the face ofdifficult challenges. As Granville Austin viewed, " The Constitution, aboveall, has been the source of the country's political stability and its open society6."

    Constitutional consensus7 underlying the Indian Constitution is to begathered in the background of historical events and contingencies of a centuryold national movement. Love of liberty, yearning for equality, protest againstrepression and exploitation, urge for self-government and effort towardscountry's unity were working in the minds of the Constitution Makers whenthey enacted the Constitution. These liberal principles of justice anddevelopment were incorporated into the political institutions. Steps towardsconstitutional consensus were meticulously taken by them inside and outsidethe Constituent Assembly by taking the people into confidence. People acceptedthese principles as enduring values by acquiescence because they consideredthem as suitable to the well being of the nation and conforming to theiraspirations, which were nurtured over the decades. People's role through theperformance of fundamental duties is significant although it is late recognizedand oft ignored. But, in spite of vast illiteracy and poverty, people of Indiaexhibited their acumen to restore constitutional democracy after the internalemergency. The common people, the intelligentsia and the voluntaryorganizations began to use the Constitution as a sword for redressal of thepeople's grievances. Large number of public interest litigations brought the

    4. Lord Irvine of Lairg, (The Development ofHuman Rights in Britain under an Incorporated Conventionon Human Rights' (1998) Public Law 221

    5. Granville Austin, Working a Democratic Constitution, (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999),p.635

    6. Ibid7. John Rawls views," A constitutional consensus at the level ofprinciples viewed apart from any underlying

    conception of society and citizen -each group having its own reasons-is consensus taken literally".John Rawls, Political Liberalism, 1993 extracted in M.D.A.Freeman, Lloyd's Introduction toJurisprudence, Sixth Ed.(London:Sweet & Maxwell,1996),p.483 .

  • 2004 - 2005] Towards bridging the gap between people and Constitution 133

    system of participative justice to the forefront and expanded the scope of rightto life. It is a creditworthy achievement that participative justice has beeninstrumental in vindicating human rights and environmental justice. Theadvantage of moulding the Constitution into people's Constitution is clear fromthis development. Added to these are the 86 Amendments, which aimed toaccommodate the socia-economic changes and political expediencies withinthe national system. Understanding the Constitution as a product of commonconscience of the community and a value document that musters popular supportfor fair management of multicultural society is an imperative to appreciate theinteraction between people and the Constitution. While full sovereign powerculminated in the constitution making process as a metajuristic fact, theparamount values undergirding the Constitution and those which are consciouslydeveloped by them in response to socio-economic changes continue to operateas inherent limitations on the process of change in the Constitution.

    It is a noteworthy fact that delicate balance between competing claimsof equality and liberty, fundamental rights and directive principles anddemocracy and economic justice is consciously contemplated and developedin constitutional law. Equal liberty of all at both individual and communitylevels is one of the parameters employed towards this end. Non-arbitrarinessin hierarchisation ofcompeting values is another factor that helps in this process.The idea of activist state rightlybeckons all the organs of state to promote theconditions of dignified life.

    Hence, any change-oriented stock taking of the constitutionalexperiences, after a half century of a republican system's working, shouldinquire: Keeping in view the fact that people are the ultimate constituencies ofthe Constitution how to promote a better relation between people and theConstitution? How. to continue or restore harmonious balancing of competingvalues mentioned above without pampering any section of the society? How toenhance the competence of the Constitution to promote cultural pluralism withinthe framework of national unity? How to integrate democratic principles withfederalism and broadbase the popular participation in the country's governance?An effort is made in this paper to understand the approach of the NCRWCtowards theses objectives. The analysis is confined to recommendations forconstitutional amendments suggested by the Commission, and does not dealwith legislative and administrative measures in support of constitutional reform.

    The basic approach

    At the outset, the Commission aimed to further the constitutionalobjectives and avoid the derogation into basic features of the Constitution.Inferring from the past experiences it said, " The society has not been able to

  • 134 NALSAR Law Review [Vol.2: No.1

    use the great gifts of Human Rights, ~Human Security, Rule of Law, SecularValues to bring about ajust, caring and inclusive society. Democratic sentimentsand institutions need to be strengthened by civic- education, identifying andstriving for common purpose and keeping the areas of private and public lifeseparate. The sociology of pluralism is not inimical to strong democracy, but,on the contrary, is in itself a strong sustaining factor ofdemocracy. It is essentialto promote participatory institutions."8

    About the interlinks of key concepts, it thought, "Democracy, rule oflaw, constitutionalism and respect for minority rights are essential, collective,inter-dependent, indivisible elements of a pluralist society. They together assurethe dignity of the individual and unity and integrity of the nation. TheConstitution promised a social revolution and the democratic means for itsachie