total shifts 0 / 7 1 / 7 1 / 7 5 / 7 input : , 2016 ...€¦ · night shifts / total shifts 0 / 7 1...
TRANSCRIPT
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer.
Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this poster are formatted for you. Type in the placeholders to add text, or click an icon to add a table, chart, SmartArt graphic, picture or multimedia file.
To add or remove bullet points from text, click the Bullets button on the Home tab.
If you need more placeholders for titles, content or body text, make a copy of what you need and drag it into place. PowerPoint’s Smart Guides will help you align it with everything else.
Want to use your own pictures instead of ours? No problem! Just click a picture, press the Delete key, then click the icon to add your picture.
Problem Statement Solution Approach Results
𝐦𝐢𝐧 𝒇𝟏 𝒙 ,𝒇𝟐 𝒙 ,𝒇𝟑(𝒙) 𝒔. 𝒕.𝒙 ∈ ℋ
Solving a sequence of constrained bi-objective problems:
Acknowledgements
This research is generously supported by the Center for Healthcare Engineering and Patient Safety, The Seth Bonder Foundation, and The Doctors Company Foundation.
Recursive Method for Finding Pareto-Dominant Shift Schedules for a Pediatric ER Department Jonathan Mogannam, Young-Chae Hong M.S.E., Amy Cohn Ph.D., Marina Epelman Ph.D., Stephen Gorga M.D.
2016 Healthcare Systems Process Improvement Conference
Building resident shift schedules for the U-M Pediatric Emergency Department is a multi-objective combinatorial problem. It is difficult to satisfy the 25+ governing rules and requirements in addition to individual preferences. Additionally, there is no single objective function or clear weights to trade off governing metrics.
Time consuming process
- 20 – 25 hours/month
Difficult to satisfy all requirements:
- 25 Governing rules & Preferences
Educational Training Requirements
Patient Safety
Regulations
Resident Satisfaction
Shift equity / Vacation requests
Bad sleep patterns
Post continuity clinic shifts
We are developing an algorithm for generating Pareto-dominant schedules to reduce the solution space for Chief Residents to review and to help elicit their preferences.
Monday
Continuity Clinics7AM – 2PM
4PM – 1AM
NIG
HIT
Day
NIG
HIT
Tuesday Wednesday
Monday
1AM – 10AM
1PM – 10PM
NIG
HIT
Wake-up
Sleepy
Day
NIG
HIT
Tuesday Sleep Pattern
Resident Name
Smith Jones Chen Joe
Night Shifts / Total Shifts
0 / 7 1 / 7 1 / 7 5 / 7
Fairness
Resident Name
Smith Jones Chen Joe
Night Shifts / Total Shifts 0 / 7 1 / 7 1 / 7 5 / 7
Fairness
𝓗 (Solution Space) : the set of feasible solutions
𝓘 (Objective Space) : the set of objective values, 𝓘 = 𝒇 𝒙 :𝒙 ∈ 𝓗
⋠ (Dominance) : 𝒙 ⋠ 𝒙′ if and only if 𝒇𝒊 𝒙 ≤ 𝒇𝒊 𝒙′ for all 𝒊 with at least one strict inequality.
𝒛 (Pareto solutions) : there is no other feasible solution 𝒙′ such that 𝒙′ ⋠ 𝒙
ℇ (Efficient Set) : set of all Pareto solutions in the solution space 𝓗
𝓕 (Pareto Front) : the set of solutions in objective space 𝓘, 𝓕 = {𝒇 𝒙 :𝒙 ∈ ℇ}
𝒛𝒊∗ (Ideal Value) : the best value of 𝒛𝒊 over the efficient Set, 𝒛𝒊
∗ = 𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝒇𝒊 𝒙 :𝒙 ∈ ℇ
𝒛 𝒊 (Nadir Value) : the worst value of 𝒛𝒊 over the efficient Set, 𝒛 𝒊 = 𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝒇𝒊 𝒙 :𝒙 ∈ ℇ
𝐦𝐢𝐧 𝒇𝟏 𝒙 ,𝒇𝟐 𝒙 𝒔. 𝒕.𝒙 ∈ ℋ
Solving a sequence of two constrained single-objective problems:
P3:(3,3)
P4:(7,2)
P2:(1,4)
P1:(0,5)
P5:(11,0)A:(0,0)
B:(7,2)
D:(1,4) C:(8,4)
(squeezing)
(squeezing)
0123456789
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
nu
mD
VR
numPostCC
Total shift equity (TSE) / Night shift equity (NSE) Bad sleep patterns (BSPs)
Denied vacation requests (DVRs) Post continuity clinic shifts (PCCs)
Preferences, tradeoff Pareto Optimality
Ongoing & Future Research
INPUT : ,
WHILE
STEP 1 : Solve
STEP 2 : Get
STEP 3 : Set
END WHILE
OUTPUT :
Candidate shift schedules created for a data set containing 18 residents with pre-determined continuity clinic shifts and vacation requests. Bi-objective problem minimizing PostCC, DVR Pareto-dominance shown between and