topic 1.2 extended b - laboratory number crunching
DESCRIPTION
FYI: RANDOM ERROR is where accuracy varies in a random manner. FYI: SYSTEMATIC ERROR is where accuracy varies in a predictable manner. Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching. Consider the following "experiment" where you construct a catapult which launches a dart at a target. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Consider the following "experiment" where you construct a catapult which launches a dart at a target.The object is to hit the bulls eye.
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
First Trial Second Trial Third Trial Fourth Trial
Low PrecisionHits not grouped
Low AccuracyAverage well below bulls eye
Low PrecisionHits not grouped
High AccuracyAverage right at bulls eye
High PrecisionHits grouped
Low AccuracyAverage well below bulls eye
High PrecisionHits grouped
High AccuracyAverage right at bulls eye
FYI: RANDOM ERROR is where accuracy varies in a random manner.
FYI: SYSTEMATIC ERROR is where accuracy varies in a predictable manner.
![Page 2: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Having gathered your data (recorded to the most significant figures allowed by your measuring devices), you will want to analyze your data, and somehow decide on its validity.We have already talked of precision. For our meter stick we could measure to 3 significant figures with a precision of ± 0.05 mm:
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
0 1
1 cm 1 mm
I estimate the length to be 1.17 cm or 11.7 mm.Considering error, L = 11.7 mm ± .05 mm.
FYI: This is the precision in a SINGLE measurement.
We call the precision of 0.05 mm the absolute error.
![Page 3: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
There are three useful percent formulas:
Fractional Error =Absolute ErrorMeasured Value
The first formula compares absolute error to a measured value:
For example, since we measured L = 11.7 mm ± .05 mm, we have
·100%
Fractional Error = 0.43%
Fractional Error
FYI: FRACTIONAL ERROR is a way to evaluate the ACCURACY of a measurement.
Fractional Error =0.0511.7
·100%
FYI: Note that the SMALLER the MEASURED VALUE, the LARGER the FRACTIONAL ERROR.
FYI: FRACTIONAL ERROR between 1% and 5% are considered fairly accurate. Less than 1% is very accurate, and greater than 10% is considered "rough."
![Page 4: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
There are three useful percent formulas:
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
Percent Difference =DifferenceAverage
The second formula compares two measured values x1 and x2:
% Diff = x1 - x2
(x1 + x2)12
For example, suppose you measure the line of the previous example to be x1 = 11.7 mm the first time, and x2 = 11.8 mm the second time.
% Diff =11.7 - 11.8
(11.7 + 11.8)12
·100%
·100%
·100%
% Diff = 0.851%
Percent Difference
FYI: PERCENT DIFFERENCE is a way to evaluate the PRECISION in your measurements - provided they are expected to be the same.
![Page 5: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
There are three useful percent formulas:
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
Percent Error =DifferenceTrue Value
The third formula compares a measured value xmeas to an accepted or "true" value xtrue:
For example, suppose you measure the diameter and circumference of a circle, and calculate pi to be 3.11.
·100%
% Err = xmeas - xtrue
xtrue
·100%
% Error =3.11 - 3.14
3.14·100%
% Err = 0.955%
Percent Error
FYI: PERCENT ERROR is a way to evaluate the ACCURACY in your measurements - provided you know what they are supposed to be.
![Page 6: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sometimes you have lots of data that you need to compare to a known value:
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
For example, suppose you measure the freefall acceleration of a dropped ball.We will learn that all freely falling objects should have a CONSTANT acceleration.So we find the average, or mean value of the data.Average Value = Sum of Values
Number of Valuesx = xi
i=1
N
Average or Mean
Freefall Acceleration
0
2
10
18
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Bob's Data
a = 0 + 2 + 10 + 18 + 205
a = 10 m s-2
Suppose another student has this data for the same experiment:
Freefall Acceleration
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acc
eler
atio
n (m
/s/s
)
Abby's Data
Bob
a = 0 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 205
a = 10 m s-2 Abby
Who's lab results are best - Bob's or Abby's?
1N
![Page 7: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
Freefall Acceleration
0
2
10
18
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Bob's Data Freefall Acceleration
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Abby's Data
a a
At first glance we may say the results are identical: After all, both have the same average acceleration of 10 m/s2.But instinctively, you may feel that Abby's data is better, because, after all, three of the data points are exactly equal to the average acceleration.In technical terms, both data sets have the same ACCURACY, but Abby's data set has better PRECISION.
So how do we distinguish between the data sets (preferably with a single number)?One way is by examining the range of the data points.
Range = Max(xi) - Min(xi) Range
These data sets each have the same range (spread) of 20 m/s2 - 0 m/s2 = 20 m/s2.Thus range isn't the best indicator of a data set's precision.
Ran
ge
Ran
ge
![Page 8: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
Freefall Acceleration
0
2
10
18
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Bob's Data Freefall Acceleration
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Abby's Data
a a
Another indicator of precision is deviation from the mean:
ith deviation = (xi - x) Deviation from the Mean
- 10
- 80
810
- 10 0 0 0
10
FYI: The ith deviation only tells you how precise a SINGLE data point is. To find the PRECISION of the data SET, you might find the AVERAGE of all of the deviations. But the average in both cases is ZERO!
-10 + -8 + 0 + 8 + 105
= 0 m s-2
-10 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 105
= 0 m s-2
![Page 9: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
Freefall Acceleration
0
2
10
18
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Bob's Data Freefall Acceleration
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Abby's Data
a a
A way around this unfortunate circumstance is to take the AVERAGE OF THE ABSOLUTE VALUES of the deviations:
Average Absolute Deviation from the Mean
10
80
810
10 0 0 0
10
average absolute deviation = |xi - x|1N
10 + 8 + 0 + 8 + 105
= 7.2 m s-2
10 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 105
= 4 m s-2
Now we have an indicator (in the form of a single number) which tells us that Abby's data is better than Bob's.
![Page 10: Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56813d11550346895da6cea7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Topic 1.2 Extended B - Laboratory number crunching
Freefall Acceleration
0
2
10
18
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Bob's Data Freefall Acceleration
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (s)
Acce
lera
tion
(m/s
/s)
Abby's Data
a a
Because absolute values are tedious (you have to take the opposite of negative differences), standard deviation is the accepted way to determine precision:
Standard Deviation
-10
-80
810
-10 0 0 0
10
(-102) + (-82) + 02 + 82 + 102
5-1
= 9.1 m s-2
(-10)2 + 02 + 02 + 02 + 102
5-1
= 7.1 m s-2
standard deviation = = (xi - x)21N-1
FYI: The standard deviation as the square root of the average of the squares of the deviations.
FYI: Squaring the deviations produces POSITIVE values, just like the absolute value.
FYI: For reasons we don't need to go into, we divide by ONE LESS THAN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DATA POINTS when finding this average.