top physics validation: 14.1.0 reconstruction, simulation and bytestream
DESCRIPTION
Top Physics Validation: 14.1.0 Reconstruction, Simulation and Bytestream. Paul S Miyagawa The University of Manchester. Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1. Objective Check 14.1.0 reconstruction AOD Datasets (Run 5200 ttbar) valid1.005200.T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD. e322_s412_r421 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Top Physics Validation:14.1.0 Reconstruction,
Simulation and Bytestream
Paul S MiyagawaThe University of Manchester
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1
• Objective– Check 14.1.0 reconstruction
• AOD Datasets (Run 5200 ttbar)– valid1.005200.T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD. e322_s412_r421
• Reco 14.1.0.1; 48k events– valid1.005200.T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD.e322_s412_r386 (reference)
• Reco 14.0.0.1; 28k events
• Plots in Appendix A: 14.1.0 Reco vs 14.0.0 Reco– Plots show no difference– Electrons, muons, jets, b-jets, fake jets, missing Et– See web pages for more plots
• http://www.hep.manchester.ac.uk/atlas/TopMC/TopMCvalidation.html
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 2
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4
• Objective– Check 14.1.0 simulation
• AOD Datasets (Run 5200 ttbar)– valid1.005200.T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD. e322_s429_r426
• Sim 14.1.0.1, CSC-05-00-00; 48k events– valid1.005200.T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD.e322_s412_r421 (reference)
• Sim 13.0.40.4, CSC-02-01-00; 48k events
• Plots in Appendix B: 14.1.0 Sim vs 14.0.0 Sim– Plots show minor differences– Electrons, muons, jets, b-jets, fake jets, missing Et– See web pages for more plots
• http://www.hep.manchester.ac.uk/atlas/TopMC/TopMCvalidation.html
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 3
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Electrons (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 4
More candidates due to backtracking?
Phi resolution worse?
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 b-jets (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 5
Reconstruction efficiency slightly lower?
14.1.0.1 BS AOD vs RDO AOD
• Objective– Check 14.1.0 bytestream reconstruction
• AOD Datasets (Run 5200 ttbar)– valid1.005200.T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD. e322_s413_b30_r423
• RDO BS 13.0.40.5, BS AOD 14.1.0.1, old LAr digi; 11.5k events– valid1.005200.T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD.e322_s412_r421 (reference)
• Direct RDO AOD 14.1.0.1, new LAr digi; 48k events
• Plots in Appendix C: BS AOD vs RDO AOD– Muons missing in central region– Electrons, jets, b-jets, missing Et look fine– See web pages for more plots
• http://www.hep.manchester.ac.uk/atlas/TopMC/TopMCvalidation.html
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 6
14.1.0.1 BS vs RDO Muons
Paul S Miyagawa Follow-up, 16 April 2008 7
Staco muons, Pt > 10 GeV
Related to missing barrel TRT photons?
Conclusions• Reconstruction in 14.1.0.1 (R13 sim + digi) shows
no differences with 14.0.0.1• Simulation in 14.1.0.1 shows minor differences
with 13.0.40.4– More electron candidates, probably due to backtracking
• Medium IsEM cut removes the extra candidates
– Phi resolution of electrons slightly worse?– Reconstruction efficiency of b-jets slightly worse?
• Bytestream reconstruction in 14.1.0.1 missing muons in barrel region– Possibly related to missing barrel TRT photons?
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 8
Appendix A:Reconstruction in 14.1.0.1
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Electrons (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 10
• Medium IsEM cut• Et > 20 GeV• Matched to e from W
decay
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Electrons (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 11
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Electrons (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 12
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Muons (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 13
• Staco muons• Pt > 10 GeV• Matched to μ from W decay
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Muons (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 14
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Muons (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 15
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Jets (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 16
• Cone4 tower jets• Pt > 40 GeV• |η| < 2.5• Matched to quark from W
or t decay
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Jets (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 17
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Jets (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 18
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 b-jets (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 19
• Cone4 tower jets• Pt > 40 GeV• |η| < 2.5• b-tag weight ≥ 7.05• Matched to b quark from t
decay
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 b-jets (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 20
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 b-jets (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 21
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 fake jets (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 22
• Cone4 tower jets• Pt > 40 GeV• |η| < 2.5• Not matched to quark from
W or t decay
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 fake jets (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 23
Reconstruction 14.1.0.1 vs 14.0.0.1 Missing Et
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 24
Appendix B:Simulation in 14.1.0.1
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Electrons (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 26
• Medium IsEM cut• Et > 20 GeV• Matched to e from W
decay
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Electrons (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 27
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Muons (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 28
• Staco muons• Pt > 10 GeV• Matched to μ from W decay
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Muons (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 29
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Muons (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 30
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Jets (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 31
• Cone4 tower jets• Pt > 40 GeV• |η| < 2.5• Matched to quark from W
or t decay
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Jets (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 32
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Jets (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 33
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 b-jets (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 34
• Cone4 tower jets• Pt > 40 GeV• |η| < 2.5• b-tag weight ≥ 7.05• Matched to b quark from t
decay
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 b-jets (3)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 35
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 fake jets (1)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 36
• Cone4 tower jets• Pt > 40 GeV• |η| < 2.5• Not matched to quark from
W or t decay
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 fake jets (2)
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 37
Simulation 14.1.0.1 vs 13.0.40.4 Missing Et
Paul S Miyagawa Physics validation meeting, 16 May 2008 38
Appendix C:Bytestream in 14.1.0.1
14.1.0.1 BS vs RDO Electrons
Paul S Miyagawa Follow-up, 16 April 2008 40
Medium IsEM cut, Et > 20 GeV
14.1.0.1 BS vs RDO Jets
Paul S Miyagawa Follow-up, 16 April 2008 41
Cone4 tower jets, Et > 40 GeV, |η| < 2.5
14.1.0.1 BS vs RDO b-jets
Paul S Miyagawa Follow-up, 16 April 2008 42
Cone4 tower jets, Et > 40 GeV, |η| < 2.5, b-tag weight ≥ 7.05
14.1.0.1 BS vs RDO Missing Et
Paul S Miyagawa Follow-up, 16 April 2008 43