top civil engineering firms

7/22/2019 Top Civil Engineering Firms

1/6

APRIL 23, 2012 menr.com

THETOP 500DESIGNFIRMS

THE TOP 500DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK
http://www.enr.com/http://www.enr.com/


2/6

2 n ENR SOURCEBOOK n July 2, 2012 enr.com

*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM TRANSPORTATION SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENRS LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.

The Top Design Firms in Transportation

TRANSPORTATIONR AN K FI RM$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP. 2,102.9

2 URS CORP. 1,596.1

3 PARSONS BRINCKERHO FF 1,042.9

4 CH2M HILL 852.4

5 HNTB COS. 813.9

HIGHWAYSR AN K F IRM$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 803.5

2 URS CORP. 601.7

3 HNTB COS. 474.7

4 PARSONS BRINCKERHO FF 420.1

5 CH2M HILL 398.8

#01AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., rankedfirst in transportat ion overall, sees anuptick in business due to more use of alter-native approaches.

BRIDGESRANK FIRM

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 URS CORP. 365.6


3 HNTB COS. 120.6

4 CH2M HILL 112.6

5 MICHAEL BAKER CORP. 107.4

AIRPORTSRANK FIRM

$ MIL.REVENUE


2 URS CORP. 248.3

3 HNTB COS. 67.1

4 JACOBS 64.2

5 BECHTEL 64.0

MASS TRANSIT AND RAILRANK FIRM

$ MIL.REVENUE


2 PARSONS BRINCKERH OFF 497.0

3 URS CORP. 330.4

4 JACOBS 320.8

5 STV GROUP INC. 196.1

MARINE AND PORT FACILITIESRANK FIRM

$ MIL.REVENUE


2 CH2M HILL 86.8

3 MOFFATT & NICHOL 71.4

4 LOUIS BERGER GROUP 55.7

5 URS CORP. 50.1

GENER

ALBUILDIN

G

WAT

ERS

UPP

LY

TRANSP

ORTATION

MAN

UFA

CTU

RIN

G

SEW

ER/W

ASTE

HAZARDOUSWASTE

POW

ER

INDU

S./PE

TROLEUM

TELEC

OM

TOTAL INTLFIRMTYPEFIRMRANK2012 2011 2011 REVENUE $ MIL.

1 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. EA 6,875.2 3,027.0 36 0 7 7 8 0 31 12 0

2 2 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif. EAC 5,334.0 1,353.9 12 3 6 7 5 19 30 16 0

3 3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif. AEC 5,222.7 2,434.2 10 10 6 1 1 53 14 3 1

4 5 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas EC 4,029.4 3,462.7 0 0 3 0 0 91 0 5 0

5 4 CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo. EAC 3,903.0 1,563.6 5 4 8 14 15 19 22 13 0

The Top 500 Design Firms

KEY TO TYPE OF FIRM

Aarchitect,E engineer,ECengineer-contractor,AEarchitect-engineer,

EAengineer-architect,ENVenvironmen-

tal,GEgeotechnical engineer,Llandscapearchitect, Pplanner andOother.

Other combinations are possible.

Firms classified themselves.

Companiesare ranked according to

revenue for design services performed in2011 in $ millions (*). Those with subsidiar-

ies are indicated by (). For information on

subsidiaries and where each firm worked

outside of the U.S., seewww.ENR.com.

**Firms not ranked last year. Some markets

may not add up to 100% due to omission

of other miscellaneous market categoryand rounding. NA=Not available.

General Buildingas a category includes

commercial buildings, offices,

stores, educational facilities, government

buildings, hospitals, medical facilities,

hotels, apartments, housing, etc.

Hazardous Wasteincludes

chemical and nuclear waste treatment,

asbestos and lead abatement, etc.

Industrial Processcomprises pulp

and paper mills, steel mills, non-ferrous

metal refineries, pharmaceutical plants,

chemical plants, food and other processing

plants, etc.

Manufacturingincludes auto,electronic assembly, textile plants, etc.

Petroleumincludes refineries,

petrochemical plants, offshore facilities,

pipelines, etc.

Power comprises thermal and hydro-

electric powerplants, waste-to-energy

plants, transmission lines, substations,

cogeneration plants, etc.

Sewerage / Solid Wasteincludes

sanitary and storm sewers, treatment

plants, pumping plants, incinerators,

industrial waste facilities, etc.

Telecommunications comprises

transmission lines and cabling, towers

and antennae, data centers, etc.Transportationincludes airports,

bridges, roads, canals, locks, dredging,

marine facilities, piers, railroads,

tunnels, etc.

Water Supplyincludes dams, reservoirs,

transmission pipelines, distribution mains,

irrigation canals, desalination and potability

treatment plants, pumping stations, etc.

How to Read the Tables

AE M TE HN L Y RP., Los Angeles, Calif. EA , . , .

. 2,102.9

AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 7 .

. 2 4.1

. .

. .

. .4
http://www.enr.com/http://www.enr.com/


3/6

*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENTAL SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENRS LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.

The Top Design Firms in Environment

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTSR AN K FI RM

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 CH2M HILL 486.8

2 AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP. 350.1

3 MWH GLOBAL 307.0

4 CDM SMITH 152.5

5 ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE 141.0

SEWERAGE AND SOLID WASTERA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 CH2M HILL 597.8


3 MWH GLOBAL 399.0

4 CDM SMITH 264.3

5 URS CORP. 260.4

HAZARDOUS WASTER AN K FI RM

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 URS CORP. 860.6



4 CH2M HILL 489.7

5 TETRA TECH INC. 394.0

WATER SUPPLYRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 TETRA TECH INC. 800.0 2 CH2M HILL 542.4


4 MWH GLOBAL 466.0

5 URS CORP. 353.6

1 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 431.8 2 CH2M HILL 401.6


4 URS CORP. 235.8


SITE ASSESSMENT AND COMPLIANCERA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE



3 MWH GLOBAL 154.0

4 URS CORP. 56.6

5 HDR 51.7

TRANSMISSION LINES AND AQUEDUCTSRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 URS CORP. 568.9 2 ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE 469.0



5 PARSONS 114.4

CHEMICAL AND SOIL REMEDIATIONR AN K FI RM

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 CH2M HILL 542.4


3 MWH GLOBAL 278.0


5 CDM SMITH 139.7

WATER TREAT. AND DESALINATION PLANTSRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.

REVENUE

SANITARY AND STORM SEWERSR AN K FI RM

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP. 186.1 2 URS CORP. 111.6


4 MWH GLOBAL 83.0

5 CDM SMITH 81.4

. 4 1.

. 1 7.

AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP. 22.3 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 468.

3 . 01.

. 184.

2 AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP. .1

. 1 .1

AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 536.2

TOP 25 U.S. ARCHITECTURE FIRMS OF 2012Companies are ranked by revenue (in millions of dollars) for architectural serv ices performed in 2011. Th is data also appears in Engineering News-Records Top500 Design Firms list, which, unlike our ranking, also includes engineering-exclusive firms.

1 2 Gensler,San Francisco A 764.08

2 1 AECOM, Los Angeles EA 445.40

3 3 Perkins+Will,Chicago A 365.40

4 84 CH2M HILL,Englewood, CO EAC 365.10

5 4 HDR Architecture,Omaha EA 364.10

2012

RANK

2011

TYPEOFFIRM

TOTALARCHITECTURALREVENUEFIRM, U.S. HEADQUARTERS

764.08

365.40

365.10

364.10 See the entire Top 250 Architecture Firms list at

architecturalrecord.com/practice.

Key to firm types

A Architect

AE Architect Engineer

AP Architect Planner

EAL Engineer Architect Landscape

AEC Architect Engineer Contractor

(not all combinations listed)45.40EAAECOM, Los Angeles12

enr.com July 2, 2012 n ENR SOURCEBOOK n 3


4/6

*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM GENERAL BUILDING SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENRS LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.

The Top Design Firms in General Building


2 GENSLER 51.5

3 HKS INC. 32.2

4 HOK 17.2

5 URS CORP. 14.8

HOTELS, MOTELS & CONVENTION CENTERSRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE


2 POPULOUS 75.9

3 HNTB COS. 21.9

4 URS CORP. 20.8

5 HKS INC. 16.4

SPORTSRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 654.2 2 GENSLER 402.2

3 HOK 131.9

4 JACOBS 102.7

5 CH2M HILL 97.8

COMMERCIAL OFFICESRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE


2 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 32.6

3 URS CORP. 18.7

4 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 17.4

5 WSP USA 17.3

MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIALRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 136.0 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 98.8

3 GENSLER 84.7

4 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 70.7

5 HENDERSON ENGINEERS INC. 44.8

RETAILRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

GENERAL BUILDINGRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 2,484.8 2 GENSLER 708.3

3 URS CORP. 646.9

4 JACOBS 543.5

5 HOK 386.7


2 JACOBS 248.1

3 URS CORP. 169.6

4 AMEC 144.3


GOVERNMENT OFFICESRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE


2 HDR 205.2

3 PERKINS+WILL 162.4

4 CANNON DESIGN 146.6

5 HKS INC. 124.7

HEALTH CARER AN K F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 PARSONS 113.3

2 URS CORP. 106.8


4 JACOBS 96.3

5 PERKINS+WILL 76.5

EDUCATIONR AN K F IR M

$ MIL.

REVENUE

Construction Manage-ment-for-Fee/PM Firms

RANK

2012 2011TOTAL

REVENUEFIRMTYPE

INT'LREVENUE

2011 REVENUE IN $ MIL.

1 1 BECHTEL,San Francisco, Calif. EC 3,979.0 428.0

2 2 CH2M HILL,Englewood, Colo. EAC 2,200.3 217.5

3 3 JACOBS,Pasadena, Calif. AEC 1,788.9 212.3

4 4 URS CORP.,San Francisco, Calif. EAC 1,553.4 46.5

5 5 AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP.,Los Angeles, Cali f. EA 1,163.8 512.1

RANK2012

DOMESTICREVENUE

INT'LREVENUE

2011 REVENUE IN $ MIL.

TOTALREVENUE

The Top 50 ProgramManagement Firms

1 CH2M HILL,Englewood, Colo. 1,982.8 217.5 2,200.3

2 BECHTEL,San Francisco, Calif. 1,433.0 4.0 1,437.0

3 JACOBS,Pasadena, Calif. 1,323.5 0.0 1,323.5

4 URS CORP.,San Francisco, Calif. 1,126.4 46.5 1,172.9

5 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP.,Los Angeles, Calif. 651.7 512.1 1,163.8

1 . 2,484.8

. .7

1 . .

1 . 1 .

. .1 . 2 .4

1 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 88.8 2 HDR 39.2

3 HOK 27.4

4 URS CORP. 25.1

5 STV GROUP INC. 20.8

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIESRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

.AE M TE HN L Y RP.

. 14.1 . .

. 4.2

ECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.,Los Angeles, Calif. . . , . AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP.,Los Angeles, Cali f. EA , . 5 .

4 n ENR SOURCEBOOK n July 2, 2012 enr.com


5/6

Top 5 Green Design Firms by Sector

RET

AIL/OFFICE

OTHER

BUILDIN

GS

MULTI-RESIDEN

TIAL

GOVERNMEN

TOF

FICE

EDUCATION

HEA

LTHCARE

HOTEL

ENTE

RTAINMENT

/C

IVIC

OTH

ERM

KTS

.

IN$ MIL.

% OF TOTALREVENUE

ACC.STAFF

2011 GREEN REVENUE

1 1 URS CO RP., San Francisco, Calif. 645 611.40 11 8 11 14 6 0 3 1 11 48

2 2 GENSLER, San Francisco, Calif. 1117 390.37 51 69 4 4 1 4 0 10 4 3

3 3 AECOM TEC HNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. 914 236.41 3 48 24 10 11 7 0 0 0 0

4 5 HOK, St. Louis, Mo. 865 164.71 37 26 15 9 31 2 1 1 13 1

5 8 HDR, Omaha, Neb. 784 137.22 9 0 66 2 16 0 0 0 16 0

RANK

2012 2011

The Top Design Firms in Power

TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION PLANTSRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 BURNS & MCDONNELL 205.1

2 POWER ENGINEERS INC. 166.2


4 BLACK & VEATCH 146.4

5 TRC COS. INC. 99.8

1 JACOBS 83.6 2 AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP. 43.3

3 ZACHRY HOLDINGS INC. 41.4

4 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 36.6

5 THE BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. 28.3

COGENERATIONR AN K FI RM

$ MIL.REVENUE

HYDROPLANTSRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 AECOM TECHNOLO GY CORP. 182.7 2 TETRA TECH INC. 70.0

3 MWH GLOBAL 68.0

4 HDR 48.5

5 AMEC 33.1

POWERRA NK F IR M

$ MIL.REVENUE

1 THE SHAW GROUP INC. 707.1

2 BLACK & VEATCH 591.2

3 SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 510.4


5 BECHTEL 444.0

WIND POWERR AN K FI RM

$ MIL.REVENUE


2 STANTEC INC. 25.2


4 ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS INC. 11.0

5 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 11.0

SOLAR POWERR AN K FI RM

$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 BECHTEL 38.0

2 FLUOR CORP. 35.3

3 ZACHRY HOLDINGS INC. 26.9


5 CH2M HILL 21.8

. 182.

. 24. . 480.

3 AECOM TECHNOLOG Y CORP. 14.4AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 1 .

2 . .

AECOM TEC HNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. .

COMMERCIAL OFFICES

R AN K F IRM$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 GENSLER 244.1

2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 89.8

3 HOK 42.0

4 URS CORP. 32.4


AE M TE HN L Y RP. .

GOVERNMENT OFFICES

R AN K F IRM$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 HDR 90.9


3 URS CORP. 65.8


5 JACOBS 48.2


EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

RA NK F IR M$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 URS C ORP. 83.5

2 PERKINS+WILL 41.9

3 LPA INC. 27.1


5 EYP ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING 23.3


RETAIL

RA NK F IR M$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 GENSLER 26.7


3 URS C ORP. 16.9

4 STANTEC INC. 8.5

5 RNL 4.7


*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM POWER SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENRS LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.

enr.com July 2, 2012 n ENR SOURCEBOOK n 5


6/6

The Top 10 by MarketTRANSPORTATIONTop 10 Revenue: $4,848.3 Mil.Sectors Revenue: $10,649.7 Mil.

2RANK

2012 2011

1 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.

2 8 ATKINS

3 4 DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS

4 5 EGIS

5 7 MOTT MACDONALD GROUP LTD.

6 6 ARUP GROUP LTD.

7 ** PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF

8 ** URS CORP.

9 ** CH2M HILL

10 9 COWI

BUILDINGTop 10 Revenue: $4,576.3 Mil.Sectors Revenue: $9,384.9 Mil.

3RANK

2012 2011


2 1 DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS

3 3 ARUP GROUP LTD.

4 5 ARCADIS NV

5 4 WSP GROUP PLC

6 8 RAMBOLL GROUP A/S

7 6 FUGRO NV

8 9 GRONTMIJ NV

9 7 ATKINS

10 ** SWECO

WATERTop 10 Revenue: $1,742.8 Mil.Sectors Revenue: $3,367.8 Mil.

6RANK

2012 2011

1 1 ARCADIS NV


3 2 GRONTMIJ NV

4 3 MWH GLOBAL

5 ** CH2M HILL

6 10 TETRA TECH INC.


8 ** ATKINS

9 ** SMEC

10 ** BLACK & VEATCH

SEWER / WASTETop 10 Revenue: $1,323.8 Mil.Sectors Revenue: $2,351.8 Mil.

7RANK

2012 2011


2 2 MWH GLOBAL

3 3 CH2M HILL

4 5 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP.

5 ** URS CORP.


7 8 GHD PTY LTD.

8 ** POYRY

9 ** DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS

10 9 BLACK & VEATCH

HAZARDOUS WASTETop 10 Revenue: $2,045.8 Mil.Sectors Revenue: $2,211.9 Mil.

8RANK

2012 2011

1 1 ARCADIS NV


3 3 URS CORP.

4 4 STANTEC INC.

5 6 TETRA TECH INC.

6 5 CH2M HILL

7 9 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOC.

8 8 AMEC PLC

9 10 ATKINS

10 ** GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS

GENER

ALBUILDIN

G

WA

TER

SUPP

LY

TRANSPO

RTATION

MA

NUFA

CTU

RIN

G

SEWER

/W

ASTE

HAZA

RDOUS

WASTE

POWER

IND

US

./P

ETROLEUM

TELE

COM

TOTAL

$ MIL.

INTL

$ MIL.

FIRM

TYPEFIRM

RANK

2012 2011

2011 REVENUE

1 1 AECOM TEC HNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A. EA 6,875.2 3,027.0 36 0 7 7 8 0 31 12 0

2 2 URS CO RP., San Francisco, Cal if., U.S.A. EAC 5,334.0 1,353.9 12 3 6 7 5 19 30 16 0

3 3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Cali f., U.S.A. AEC 5,222.7 2,434.2 10 10 6 1 1 53 14 3 1

4 4 WORLEYPARSONS LTD., North Sydney, NSW, Australia EC 4,459.1 3,413.8 0 0 11 1 0 69 4 0 0

5 7 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas, U.S.A. EC 4,029.4 3,462.7 0 0 3 0 0 91 0 5 0

International Design

1 ECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A. EA , . , .

AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.

2 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2 4 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.

Excerpted and posted from Engineering News-Record andArchitectural Record,April 23, June 11, July 2 and July 23, 2012, copyright by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. with all rights reserved.

This reprint implies no endorsement, either tacit or expressed, of any company, product, service or investment opportunity.

#C12021 Managed by The YGS Group, 800.290.5460. For more information visit www.theYGSgroup.com/content.

THE TOP 150 GLOBAL DESIGN FIRMS

www.aecom.com

ENGINEERSWITHOUT BORDERS

GREENESTBIG COMPANIES

BEST CORPORATESTEWARD AWARD FINALIST
http://www.theygsgroup.com/contenthttp://www.aecom.com/http://www.ethisphere.com/http://www.aecom.com/http://www.theygsgroup.com/content

top civil engineering firms

Documents