tooth size and morphology in a recent australian aboriginal population from broadbeach, south east...

10
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 55:423 -432 (1981) Tooth Size and Morphology in a Recent Australian Aboriginal Population From Broadbeach, South East Queensland PATRICIA SMITH, T. BROWN AND W.B. WOOD Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculties of Medicine and Dental Medicine, Hebrew University - Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel (P.S.1, Depart- ment of Restorative Dentistry, University of Adelaide, S. Australia (T.B.), and Department of Anatomy. University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland Australia (W.B. W.) KEY WORDS Dentition, Tooth size, Morphology, Aborigine ABSTRACT Odontometric and morphologic observations were made of the dentition of skeletal remains of Australian aborigines from Boradbeach, S.E. Queensland. Tooth size, especially of the molars, was found to be significantly larger than that reported for other recent Aboriginal populations. Tooth mor- phology also differed, with a higher frequency of five cusped second molars, and a lower frequency of shoveling and Carabelli's cusp than previously reported as typical of Australian aborigines. Human occupation in Australia is now known to date back at least 40,000 years (Jones, 1977), with the earliest well-dated skeletal remains yet found some 30,000 years old (Thorne, 1976). Human skeletal samples from this and most subsequent periods are small and mainly limited to the South East (Fig. l), but sufficient have been described to suggest the presence of at least two physical types: one more gracile and one more robust (Mulvaney, 1975: Thorne, 1977; Freedman and Lofgren, 1979). One of the most robust of recent aboriginal populations known is that from Broadbeach in South East Queensland. The site was ex- cavated by Haglund (1976) between 1965 and 1968 and has yielded the skeletal remains of at least 150 individuals from burials dating over the past 1,000 years. Wood (1968)has described the general con- dition of the skeletal remains. He found a high proportion of juveniles, many more iden- tifiable males than females, and few old in- dividuals. Freedman and Wood (1977)studied the crania and mandibles and found them to differ from those of other recent aboriginal skeletal remains from Queensland and New South Wales. We have examined the Broadbeach teeth and jaws, and the findings for tooth size and morphology are presented here as a contribu- tion to the steadily growing body of data on the dentition of the aboriginal populations of Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS After sorting through all the skeletal re- mains from Broadbeach, the teeth and jaws of 96 specimens were identified and examined in detail. Adult specimens were aged and sexed using the criteria described by Freedman and Wood (1977). Fragmentary specimens and juveniles that could not be confidently sexed using these criteria were coded as sex unknown. Infants and juveniles were aged by comparing dental eruption stages with those of living aboriginals of known age, described by Brown et al. (1979). For each individual, dental status was recorded and teeth present were scored as sound, carious, fractured, or worn. Following this initial inspection, all sound teeth with little or no attrition were measured and examined for presence of dental traits. The maximum mesiodistal and buccolingual diameters of each tooth were measured using specially sharpened vernier calipers with a Received May 1. 1980; accepted January 16, 1981 0002-948318115504-0423$03.00 0 1981 ALAN R. LISS, INC.

Upload: patricia-smith

Post on 06-Jun-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 55:423 -432 (1981)

Tooth Size and Morphology in a Recent Australian Aboriginal Population From Broadbeach, South East Queensland

PATRICIA SMITH, T . BROWN AND W.B. WOOD Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculties of Medicine and Dental Medicine, Hebrew University - Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel (P.S.1, Depart- ment of Restorative Dentistry, University of Adelaide, S. Australia (T.B.), and Department of Anatomy. University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland Australia (W.B. W.)

KEY WORDS Dentition, Tooth size, Morphology, Aborigine

ABSTRACT Odontometric and morphologic observations were made of the dentition of skeletal remains of Australian aborigines from Boradbeach, S.E. Queensland. Tooth size, especially of the molars, was found to be significantly larger than that reported for other recent Aboriginal populations. Tooth mor- phology also differed, with a higher frequency of five cusped second molars, and a lower frequency of shoveling and Carabelli's cusp than previously reported as typical of Australian aborigines.

Human occupation in Australia is now known to date back at least 40,000 years (Jones, 1977), with the earliest well-dated skeletal remains yet found some 30,000 years old (Thorne, 1976). Human skeletal samples from this and most subsequent periods are small and mainly limited to the South East (Fig. l), but sufficient have been described to suggest the presence of at least two physical types: one more gracile and one more robust (Mulvaney, 1975: Thorne, 1977; Freedman and Lofgren, 1979).

One of the most robust of recent aboriginal populations known is that from Broadbeach in South East Queensland. The site was ex- cavated by Haglund (1976) between 1965 and 1968 and has yielded the skeletal remains of a t least 150 individuals from burials dating over the past 1,000 years.

Wood (1968) has described the general con- dition of the skeletal remains. He found a high proportion of juveniles, many more iden- tifiable males than females, and few old in- dividuals. Freedman and Wood (1977) studied the crania and mandibles and found them to differ from those of other recent aboriginal skeletal remains from Queensland and New South Wales.

We have examined the Broadbeach teeth and jaws, and the findings for tooth size and

morphology are presented here as a contribu- tion to the steadily growing body of data on the dentition of the aboriginal populations of Australia.

MATERIALS A N D METHODS

After sorting through all the skeletal re- mains from Broadbeach, the teeth and jaws of 96 specimens were identified and examined in detail. Adult specimens were aged and sexed using the criteria described by Freedman and Wood (1977). Fragmentary specimens and juveniles that could not be confidently sexed using these criteria were coded as sex unknown. Infants and juveniles were aged by comparing dental eruption stages with those of living aboriginals of known age, described by Brown et al. (1979). For each individual, dental status was recorded and teeth present were scored as sound, carious, fractured, or worn.

Following this initial inspection, all sound teeth with little or no attrition were measured and examined for presence of dental traits. The maximum mesiodistal and buccolingual diameters of each tooth were measured using specially sharpened vernier calipers with a

Received May 1. 1980; accepted January 16, 1981

0002-948318115504-0423$03.00 0 1981 ALAN R. LISS, INC.

Page 2: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

424

W Recent sites

0 Fossil sites

P. SMITH, T. BROWN, AND W.B. WOOD

Fig. 1. Map of Australia showing the locat,ion of sites referred to in the text.

helios dial accurate to 0.05 mm. The beaks of the calipers were held parallel to the long axis of the tooth being measured and all measurements were rounded off to the nearest 0.1 mm: Accuracy of measurement, determin- ed by repeating measurements at random dur- ing the course of the month long study, was of the order of f 0.15 mm.

Morphological traits were recorded only on unworn and slightly worn teeth, since hypoconulids and sixth and seventh cusps in the lower molars, together with additional marginal cusps on the upper molars, may be only faintly delineated by shallow grooves that are early obliterated by attrition, while the ma- jor grooves delineating the four larger cusps are still intact. Similarly, attrition ad palatum in the upper molars can obliterate grooves delineating occlusally placed Carabelli cusps when occlusal attrition is still slight to moderate.

For the incisors and canines, the presence of shoveling and lingual tubercles was recorded. For the upper molars, cusp number and development of metaconp and hypocone were scored, and the presence and location of marginal ridge cusps were recorded. For the lower molars, cusp number and pattern was

recorded after Dahlberg (1951). All data were coded and transferred to punch cards for com- puter analysis, using SPSS programmes (Nie et al., 1975) to obtain descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Although 96 specimens were examined for the dental study, only 36.4% were identified as male and 6.3% as female; all the rest were too young or too incomplete to be sexed with a high degree of confidence using skeletal criteria. There were few missing teeth other than upper incisors which had been avulsed in adolescence. A detailed description of dental pathology will be published elsewhere.

Teeth could not be measured in many of the older specimens because of attrition. This ap- plied especially to the first molars, which were usually severely worn even in individuals in their early twenties. Figure 2 shows the lower molars of a young individual with incomplete union of long bone ephiphyses, and an in- completely erupted third molar, but severely worn first molar.

The sample sizes from which mean values of tooth diameters were calculated varied accord- ingly and were especially small for upper cen- tral incisors and first molars. The mean values

Page 3: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

DENTITION OF BHOADBEACH AHOHIGINES 425

Fig. 2. Lower right molars and premolars in young individual from Hroadheach. Note the large size of the second molar, and marked attrition ot the first molar. relative l o the other teeth.

obtained are shown in Table 1. All tooth diameters are large, with those of males larger than those of females, although female sample sizes are too small for valid statistical com- parisons to be made between the sexes. The mean values of tooth diameters in the mixed sample, which includes all teeth measured, is smaller than that of the all male group, although it includes many completely unworn teeth from children and juveniles, presumably because of the inclusion of smaller, female teeth in this category.

MORPHOLOGY

The upper incisors are large, broad, and smooth with little shoveling and only small lingual tubercles. Trace shoveling was found on 46% of central incisors, and lingual tubercles on 28% (Table 2). Table 3 lists the fre- quencies of molar cusp pattern. All four major cusps are present on the upper first molars and on 9670 of second molars and 82% of third molars, with additional cuspules present on the marginal ridges of most molars. Thirty- three percent of first molars show some manifestation of Carabelli’s trait (pits, fur- rows, bulges), but only 3% have a well-defined cusp. Five well-developed cusps are present on 95% of lower first molars, on 92% of second molars and 85% of third molars, with cusp pat- tern predominantly Y5 on first molars and + 5 on second and third molars. Sixth cusps are

present on 65% of first molars, 42Y0 of second molars, and 27Yc of third molars, but seventh cusps and protostylids are rare.

DISCUSSION

In small-toothed contemporary populations there are considerable differences in tooth size and morphology between teeth of the same class. Dahlberg (1951) explained these dif- ferences as resulting from the suppression of primary characters in the more variable tooth of each class, which is usually the more distal tooth and later in developing. As tooth size reduces, the distal teeth reduce in size at a faster rate than the more stable key teeth; thus the M2 > M1 sequence common in large- toothed fossil hominids has changed to an M1 > M2 sequence in small toothed populations, and these changes in tooth size are associated with reduction in molar cusp number (Dahlberg, 1961, 1965; Keene, 1968). In the Broadbeach dentition, as in other large- toothed populations, there is little difference in tooth size between the two molars, and little reduction in cusp number in the second molars.

Tables 4 and 5 give the mean values of tooth diameters in aboriginal groups from other regions in Australia measured using the same criteria as those applied to measurements on the Broadbeach sample. All measurements were taken by the same investigator except those for Yuendumu, and double determina-

Page 4: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

TA

BL

E 1

. Bro

adbe

ach:

Mes

iodi

stal

and

buc

colin

gual

dia

met

ers

of p

erm

anen

t te

eth’

Max

illa

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ixed

No.

X

SD

N

o.

X

SD

N

o.

X

SD

-

- -

I1

MD

7

9.8

0.8

1

9.5

-

15

9

.9

0.7

BL

8

7.9

0.6

2 7.

4 0

.3

16

8.

0 0.

5 I2

M

D

12

7.

8 0

.6

4 7.

2 0.

6 27

7

.7

0.6

BL

1

4

7.0

0.6

3 6.

3 0.

7 25

7.

0 0.

6 C

MD

1

4

8.6

0.6

3 8

.3

0.7

29

8.5

0.

6 P1

M

D

20

7.9

0.5

3 7

.6

0.5

31

7.

9 0.

5 B

L 1

8

10.5

0.

6 3

9.7

0.4

31

10

.4

0.7

..

.~

P2

MD

1

9

7.5

0.5

3 7

.3

0.4

30

7.

6 0.

7 B

L

20

10.5

0.

6 3

10

.2

0.2

31

10.5

0.

6 M

1 M

D

9 11

.9

0.6

2 10

.4

2.0

34

11.7

0.

8

M2

MD

20

11

.6

0.9

4 10

.9

0.6

34

11.4

0.

9 B

L

9 12

.9

0.5

1

12.9

-

33

12.8

0.

7

BL

1

9

13.5

0.

7 4

13.0

0.

6 33

13

.3

0.8

M3

MD

23

10

.1

1.0

3

9.7

0.4

29

10.2

1.

0 B

L

23

12.4

1.

0 3

11.6

0.

7 29

12

.5

1.0

Man

dibl

e

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ixed

’d

- -

- E

No.

X

S

D

No.

X

SD

N

o.

X

SD

7

8 5.

9 0

.3

1

10

6.

5 0.

4 1

1

5

7.0

0.6

1

14

6.8

0.5

1

17

7.7

0.4

3 16

8

.1

0.5

4 19

9

.0

0.4

4

6.0

-

22

6.0

0.

5 6

.1

-

22

6.4

0.4

6.8

-

29

6.9

0.5

7.4

-

26

6.7

0.5

7.3

0

.3

32

7.7

0.4

7.2

0.

9 31

7.

9 0.

6 8.

4 0.

7 32

8

.8

0.6

7.6

0.8

27

8.0

0.6

18

8.

0 0.

6 2

19

9.

3 0.

7 3

8.9

0

.9

29

9.2

0.7

7 12

.3

0.6

2 12

.0

0.7

32

12.6

0.

9 7

11.6

1.

0 2

11.4

0.

5 32

11

.6

0.7

16

12.8

0.

6 4

11.9

1.

0 32

12

.8

0.8

17

11.8

0.

6 4

19

12.1

0.

6 4

18

11.5

0.

5 3

11.2

0.

4 32

11

.7

0.6

11

.3

0.8

24

12.0

0.

8 10

.4

0.5

23

11.4

0.

7

‘Ind

ivid

ual m

easu

rem

ents

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e of

rig

ht a

nd le

ft s

ides

whe

re p

rese

nt

Page 5: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

DENTITION OF BKOADBEACH AHOItIGINES 427

TABLE 2. Morphology of upper anterior teeth at Broadbeach ~~

C I* I' No. % No. % No. %

Shoveling Absent 25 96 17 77 7 54

6 46 Trace 1 4 5 23 14 100 Total 26 100 22 100

AEent 9 36 12 55 5 36 Bulge 8 32 6 27 5 36 Tubercle 8 32 4 18 4 28 Total 25 100 22 100 14 100

Lin al Tubercle

tions taken by this investigator and Dr. Town- send, who measured the Yuendumu sample, showed a high measure of concordance.

The measurements for Yuendumu and Kalumburu were taken from casts of the teeth of living Aborigines, those for Swanport from the skulls and mandibles of individuals who probably died in the early part of the last cen- tury (Stirling, 191 1). and those of Roonka from skeletal remains assigned to three distinct strata dating back 7,000 years (Pretty, 1977). Since no differences were found in tooth size between specimens from different strata a t Roonka (Smith and Prokopec, in preparation), all specimens from Roonka were pooled for this study. Only at Roonka is tooth size com- parable to that found in the Broadbeach series. Teeth at all the other sites are smaller, with teeth smallest in the series from Yuendumu. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05 or less) were found between Broadbeach and other recent groups in upper first premolar and first and second molar length and lower second incisor, canine, premolar, and second molar length. Statistically significant differences between Broadbeach and Roonka were found only in lower first molar and first incisor and upper canine breadth.

These findings suggest a rather irregular distribution of tooth size within Australia, with abrupt disconformities. The Swanport and Roonka sites, which are less than 30 miles apart, differ more in tooth size than Roonka and Broadbeach or Swanport and Kalumburu, which are more than 2,000 miles apart. This pattern is repeated within Queensland. The dif- ferences in cranial and mandibular dimensions found between Broadbeach and other Queens- land and New South Wales sites by Freedman and Wood (1977) are reflected in tooth size. Molar tooth measurements of the New South Wales sample were found by Hanihara (1976)

to show no differences from those of Yuendumu .

The differences in molar size are repeated in molar cusp number. Richards and Telfer (1979) reported that at Kalumburu 85% of se- cond molars have more than four cusps, at Swanport 72%, and at Yuendumu only 49%. In their study, the specimens lacking the hypoconulid but with a sixth or seventh cusp were included in the "more than four cusps" category, so that the percentage of second molars with hypoconulids present in their samples, may be even less than that reported here.

The distribution of other discrete traits that appear to be independent of tooth size (Garnet al., 1966; Keene, 1968; Smith, 1977) shows fewer differences (Table 6). The frequency of Carabelli's cusp is similar at all sites except Yuendumu, and the frequency of sixth and seventh cusps is similar at Broadbeach and Yuendumu. The main differences found are in shoveling, which is more pronounced at Kalumburu and Yuendumu.

With the exception of Hanihara's study (Hanihara, 1976), most published dataon tooth size in other skeletal material from Australia is based on samples including unknown propor- tions of males and females. The mean values calculated for tooth size in a mixed series by Campbell (1929, which included material from most parts of Australia and for the Murray Black Collection' by Gabrial (1955), are smaller than those found for Broadbeach, but may be biased by the inclusion of differing pro-

~ .. ~~~

'The Murray Hlack Collection campri%s somc hundreds CJS skelrtons collected over a period uf years tram undated sites along the Murray River Valley (Sunderland and Nay. 19591. Some of these sites may tic fairly old, as rddiocarhon dates obtained troin recently excavated sites in the same region are in the 4001)-6000 H.P. range IHlackwood and Simpson. 19731.

Page 6: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

428 P. SMITH, T. BROWN, AND W.B. WOOD

TABLE 3. Distribution of discrete traits in Broadbeach molars

Lower molars

M3 M* M, No. % No. % No. %

Cusp pattern Y5 Y4 x 5 x 4

- - 1 4 1 4 - -

+ 5 17 85 20 88 + 4 2 10 1 4 Total 20 100 23 100

Sixth cusp Absent 10 67 10 53 2 grooves 1 6 1 5 Sm. than 5th cusp 4 27 7 37

1 5 Equal to 5th cusp - -

Total 15 100 19 100

18 86 - - - - 1 5 2 9

21 100 - -

8 35

12 52 - -

3 13 23 100

Seventh cusp Absent 13 93 20 95 25 92

1 4

21 100 27 100 Total 14

Absent 9 45 7 27 8 53 Pit 11 55 18 69 16 67 Small cusp - -

Total 20 100 26 100 24 100

- - - Lingual groove - Double groove 1 7 1 5 1 4

100

Protostylid

- - 1 4

Upper molars

M3 M2 M' No. % No. % No. %

6 16 37 86 Normal - -

Small 20 80 25 78 5 14 Reduced 5 20 2 6

25 100 32 100 42 100 Total

Metacone reduction

- -

Hypocone reduction Normal 1 5 1 4 14 35

Reduced 11 50 11 38 4 10 Absent 4 18 1 4 2 5

Small 6 27 16 55 20 50

Total 22 100 29 100 40 100

Additional cusps on marginal ridge

None Present on mesial marginal ridge Present on distal marginal ridge On both Total

Absent Pit Double furrow Y-shaped groove Prominence Small cusp Total

Carabelli's cusp

2 9 3 21 3 17

3 17 1 5

18 86 11 79 9 49 - 3 17

21 100 14 100 18 100

- -

- - -

16 74 2 9 2 9 2 9

22 91

1 3 1 3 1 3

- - 20 67

2 7 3 10 3 10 1 3 1 3

22 100 24 100 30 100 - - - -

Page 7: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

TA

BL

E 4

. Mea

n va

lues

for

max

illar

y to

oth

mea

sure

men

ts in

mal

e ab

orig

ines

fro

m d

iffe

rent

reg

ions

in A

ustr

alia

' ~

C

t? Sw

anpo

rt

Y ue

ndum

u K

alum

buru

A

nson

Bay

R

oonk

a -

- -

- -

z '--j -

Max

illa

No.

X

S

D

No.

X

S

D

No.

X

S

D

No.

X

S

D

No.

X

S

D

1'

MD

7

9.2

0.3

206

9.4

0.6

16

BL

9

7.9

0.4

205

7.9

0.5

10

l2 M

D

11

7.6

0.4

203

7.5

0.6

16

BL

14

7.

1 0.

5 19

4 6.

9 0.

5 10

C

MD

15

8.

3 0.

7 19

2 8.

2 0.

5 10

P'

PZ M'

M'

M3

BL

M

D

BL

M

D

BL

M

D

BL

M

D

BL

M

D

BL

16

19

20

18

20

23

26

20

23

16

17

9.2

7.6'

10

.4

7.3

10.4

11

.4'

13.0

10

.8'

13.5

9.

8 12

.7

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.6

0.5

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.6

0.7

186

200

199

191

191

208

208

158

154 57

48

9.0

7.6'

10

.2

7.1

10.2

11

.2'

12.5

10

.8'

12.8

' 10

.0

12.3

0.6

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.8

9 12

10

9 10

16

13

9 7 2 2

9.5

0.7

4 9.

4 8.

2 0.

3 6

8.0

7.6

0.9

3 8.

0 7.

2 0.

5 6

7.0

8.2

0.5

5 8.

6 9.

1 0.

4 5

9.2

7.8

0.4

5 7.

8 10.5

7.2

10.6

11

.2'

12.5

11

.0

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.1

10.6

7.

5 10

.6

11.6

13

.4

10.5

' 13

.2

0.4

6 13

.3

9.9

-7

10

.1

12.2

-

7

13.2

*Ind

ivid

ual m

easu

rem

ents

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e of

rig

ht a

nd le

ft s

ides

whe

re p

rese

nt.

'Dif

fers

from

Bro

adbe

ach

(P>O

.O5)

whe

n m

ean

valu

es a

re c

ompa

red using

Stud

ent'

s t-t

est.

0.7

0.7

0.9

0.4

0.3

0.6

7 11 9 17

17

18

0.8

17

0.6

17

0.6

17

0.8

18

0.8

16

0.7

17

0.9

18

0.7

18

0.7

0.7

19

19

10.2

8.

4 8.

1 7.

3 8.

6 9.

6 8.

0 0.

8 7.

6 0.

7 1.

6 3.

0 1.

2 3.

7 10

.3

12.4

0.5

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.6

0.5

0.5

0.7

0.4

0.7

1 .o 0.8

0.5

0.8

0.8

1.1

Page 8: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

4

w

0

TA

BL

E 5

. Mea

n va

lues

for

man

dibu

lar

toot

h m

easu

rem

ents

in

mal

e ab

orig

ines

from

dif

fere

nt r

egio

ns i

n A

ustr

alia

'

Swan

port

No.

X

SD

-

MD

5

6.1

0.5

BL

11

6.

4 0.

4 M

D

8 6.

5'

0.4

BL

12

6.

6 0.

6 M

D

BL

BL

M

D

BL

13

15

12

14

13

12

13

16

16

17

13

12

7.4'

8.

2 7.

5'

9.1

7.7

8.9

12.5

11

.9

12.5

11

.8

11.7

11

.4

0.4

0.7

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.7

0.5

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.7

0.8

Y ue

ndum

u -

No.

X

20

6 5.

8 20

6 6.

6 20

6 6.

6 19

6 6.

8 19

8 7.

4'

183

8.2

196

7.5'

19

6 8.

8 18

5 7.

5'

183

9.2

205

12.0

20

6 11

.8

176

11.4

' 16

9 11

.5

54

11.7

59

11

.5

-

SD

0.

4 0.

4 0.

4 0.

4 0.

4 0.

5 0.

5 0.

6 0.

5 0.

5 0.

6 0.

6 0.

7 0.

6 1.

0 0.

7

~

Kal

umbu

ru

Ans

on B

ay

No.

X

SD

N

o.

X

SD

14

6.0

0.4

2 5.

9 -

6.4

0.5

6 6.

9 0.

7 3

15

6.5'

0.

7 2

6.8

-

6.7

0.5

7 6.

7 0.

3 5

11

7.3'

0.

5 4

7.8

0.6

6 8.

8 0.

5 5

8.2

0.4

11

7.6'

0.

6 2

8.5

-

7 8.

6 0.

8 5

8.9

0.6

10

7.7

0.5

3 8.

0 0.

5 7

9.3

0.7

5 9.

1 0.

6 18

12

.3

0.6

2 12

.1

-

9 11

.8

0.5

6 12

.1

0.4

- -

__ ~

9 12

.03

0.8

4 12

.1

i.0

7 11

.8

0.4

5 11

.6

0.5

4 11

.9

0.7

4 12

.7

0.3

2 11

.4

-

4 11

.8

-

No.

10

11

9 12

13

17

14

17

14

18

10

17

16

19

16

16

Roo

nka

- X

SD

6.6'

0.

3 6.

6 0.

4 7.

2 0.

2 6.

9 0.

3 7.

9 0.

6 8.

6 0.

7 8.

1 0.

5 9.

1 0.

7 8.

2 0.

4 9.

2 0.

7 13

.1

0.6

j

z 0

12.4

' 0.

6 13

.0

0.7

12.1

0.

7 11

.9

0.9

11.3

0.

8

3 0

U

'Ind

ivid

ual

mea

sure

men

ts b

ased

on

aver

age

of r

ight

and

left

sid

es w

here

pre

sent

. 'D

iffe

rs fr

om B

road

beac

h (P

>O.O

5) w

hen

mea

n va

lues

are

com

pare

d us

ing

Stud

ent'

s t-

test

Page 9: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

DENTITION OF BROADBEACH ABORIGINES 431

?'ABLE 6. llistribution of dental traits in aboriginals* ~.

I ' M' M , M,

Shoveling Carabelh's cusp 6 th cusp 7th cusp 5th cusp

Broadbeach 0.54 0.03 0.65 0.08 0.92 - 0.85 Kalumburu 0.90 0.27 -

Anson Bay 0.57 0.00 - 0.50 - 0.72 Swanport 0.60 0.03 -

Yuendumu 0.85 0.16 0.52 0.06 0.49

~

portions of smaller-toothed females. However, even the maximum values recorded by Gabriel (1955) are smaller for all teeth than those recorded for Broadbeach, suggesting a real dif- ference in tooth size between these two groups.

Brace (1980) described a north-south cline in tooth size, with the smallest teeth in the north. This he attributed to admixture of the in- digenous population with smaller-toothed groups entering the continent from the north, and Broadbeach outside the main wave of gene flow. However, many of the samples used by Brace were small in size, some were of uncer- tain provenience, and their sex ratio may have varied. Brown and Townsend (1980) calculated that differences in sex ratio of samples studied by Brace would produce a difference of the order of size used by him to denote biological differences between groups.

Our findings, based on the data presented here, suggest a rather more irregular distribu- tion of large-toothed and small-toothed groups within Australia, with the smallest-toothed group in the central desert, tooth size in Nor- thern and Southern coastal groups remarkably similar, and the largest-toothed group a t Broadbeach in the South East.

Smith (1979a, 1980) and Brown and Town- send (1980) have proposed that these dif- ferences may be related to regional differences in environmental conditions. Brown and Town- send (1980) have also pointed out that there is a high concentration of fluoride in the drinking water a t Yuendumu, and that this may further affect tooth size in individuals from that region. Smith (1979a, b, 1980) reported on regional differences in tooth size within recent populations in South America, and in terminal Paleolithic and epipaleolithic populations in North Africa and the Near East. In both areas, tooth size diffferences are associated with dif- ferences in environmental conditions and food resources utilized.

These findings lend further support t o the hypothesis that local adaptations to dif- ferences in environmental conditions, rather than gene flow, may account for differences in tooth size within Australia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported in part by grants in aid from the Wenner-Gren Founda- tion and the Joint Research Fund of Hadassah and Alpha Omega.

We thank the trustees of the South Austral- ian Museum for permission to examine material in their care, and Ms. W. Lambert for help with data analysis.

LITERATURE CITED

Blackwood. R, and Simpson, K (1973) Attitudes of Aboriginal skeletons excavated in the Murray River region between Mildura and Renmark, Australia. Mem. Nat. Mus. Victoria 3499- 150.

Brace, CL (1980) Australian tooth-size clines and the death of a stereotype. Curr. Anthropol. 21:141- 164

Brown, T. Jenner, JD, Barret. MJ, and Lees, GL (1979) Exfoliation of deciduous teeth and gingival emergence of permanent teeth in Australian Aborigines. Occ. Papers in Hum. Biol. I . Canberra, pp. 47-70.

Brown, R. and Townsend, GC 11980) Comments on Austral- ian tooth-size clines. Curr. Anthropol. 21:153-54.

Campbell. TD (1925) Dentition and Palate of the Australian Aborigine. Adelaide, S. Australia: Keith Sheridan Foun- dation Pub. 1 .

Dahlberg. AA (1951) The dentition of the American Indian. In WS Laughlin (ed): The Physical Anthropology of the American Indian. Ann Arbor: Edwards Brothers, pp. 138-176.

Dahlberg, AA (1961) Relationship of toothsize tocusp num- ber and groove conformation of occlusal surface patterns of lower molar teeth. J. Dent. Res. 4034-80.

Dahlberg, AA (1965) Evolutionary background of dental and facial growth. J. Dent. Res. 44:151- 160.

Freedman, L, and Lofgren. M (1979) Human skeletal re- mains from Cossack Western Australia. J. Hum. Evol. 8283-299.

Freedman, L, and Wood, WB (1977) Metrical features of Australian Aboriginal crania and mandibles from Broadbeach. South East Queensland. Arch. Phys. An- thropol. Oceania 121 -25.

Gabriel, A (1955) The correlation of the size of human teeth

Page 10: Tooth size and morphology in a recent Australian Aboriginal population from Broadbeach, South East Queensland

P. SMITH, T. BROWN, AND W.B. WOOD 432

with one another and with certain jaw measurements. Dent. J. Aust. 27174-186.

Garn, SM, Lewis, AB, Kerewsky. RS, and Dahlberg, AA (1966) Genetic independence of Carabelli's trait from tooth or crown morphology. Arch. Oral Biol. 11:745 -747.

Haglund, L (1976) 'The Broadbeach Aboriginal Burial Ground, St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

Hanihara. K (1976) Statistical and comparative studies of the Australian Aboriginal dentition. Tokyo: The Universi- ty Museum, The University of Tokyo, Bulletin No. 11.

Jones, R. (1977) Australia Felix. The discovery of a Pleistocene prehistory. J. Hum. Evol. 6353-361.

Keene, H J (1968) The relationship between Carabelli's Lrait and the size, number and morphology of the maxillary molars. Arch. Oral Biol. 131023-1025.

Mulvaney. D (1975) The Prehistory of Australia. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin Books.

Nie, NH, Hull, CH, Jenkins, JG, Steinbrenner, K, and Bent. DH (1975) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill.

Pretty, G (1977) The cultural chronology of Roonka Flat -a preliminary consideration. In RVS Wright (ed): Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution and Com- plexity. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

Richards, LC, and Telfer, PJ (1979) The use of dental characters in the assessment of genetic distance in Australia. Arch. Phys. Anthropol. Oceana 14:184 - 194.

Smith, P (1977) Variations in dental traits within popula-

tions. In AA Dahlberg and TM Graber (eds): Orofacial Growth and Development, The Hague: Moulton Press,

Smith, P (1979a) Dental evolution: Selection or drift? Paper presented at the 5th Internat. Symp. on Dental Mor- phology, Turku, Finland.

Smith, P (1979b) Regional variation in Epipaleolithic populations. OSSA 6243-250.

Smith, P. (1980) On Australian tooth-size clines. Curr. An- thropol. 21:410.

Smith, P, and Prokopec, M (in preparation) The dentition of Australian Aborigines from Roonka Flat.

Stirling, EC (1911) Preliminary report on the discovery of native remains at Swanport River, Murray. Trans. R. S. Aust. 354-46.

Sunderland, S, and Ray, J L (1959) A note on the Murray Black Collection of Australian Aboriginal skeletons. Roc. R. SOC. Victoria 7I:45 -48

Thorne. AG (1976) Morphological contrasts in Pleistocene Australians. In RL Kirk and AG Thorne (eds): The Origin of the Australians. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, pp. 95- 112.

Thorne, AG (1977) Separation or reconciliation? Biological clues to the development of Australian Society. In J Allen, J Golson, and R Jones (eds): Sunda and Sahal. Lon- don: Academic Press, pp. 187-203.

Wood, WB (1968) An Aboriginal burial ground a t Broadbeach, Queensland. Mankind 6681 -686.

pp. 171-182.