tool analysis of strategic competitiveness
TRANSCRIPT
1
Tool
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
Management tools have played a substantial role in
optimizing strategic and operational work for decades.
On the following pages, some instruments are
presented that can be used to analyze
competitiveness and strategic positioning.
2
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Life Cycle Analysis (1)
IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Profit
Revenue
DeclineMaturityIntroduction Growth
Course of Time
Re
ve
nu
e o
r. P
rofi
t
3IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Profit
Revenue
Increase Familiarity Expand Market Share
Focus on marketing product improvement and product diversification
Defense of Market Share and Product
modifications necessary
Cost ControlEnsure Productivity
Growth PhaseIntroduction Phase Decline PhaseMaturity Phase
▪ Products largely unfamiliar
▪ Low revenue and high initial costs/ development costs
▪ Negative profits in sales and marketing
▪ Growing awareness of the product
▪ Disproportional increase in sales
▪ Positive Profits
▪ Increased competition and competitive pressure
▪ Maximum sales
▪ Declining Profits
▪ saturation of the market
▪ Maximum number of competitors
▪ Degeneration phase with steadily falling profits
▪ Low profits
▪ Changed customer needs
▪ Low demands
▪ Exit market
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Life Cycle Analysis (2)
4IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Features
Customer / Purchase
Pattern
Innovators with mostly high
income/ inert, have to be
convinced
Expanded Customer circle/
Customers accept uneven level
of quality
Mass market, repeated
purchases / Selection among
brands
Experienced Customers ,
Latecomer / demanding in
selection
Turnovers Low Fast Growth Slow Growth Decrease
Profits Not notable Peaks Declines Low or Zero
Cash-Flow Negative Moderate High Low
Competition View CompaniesIncreasingly more / Entries,
Fusions and bankruptcies
Many / Especially price
competitionIncreasingly less/ Exits
Risk High BearableStarting sensitivity to economic
situations
Actions
Main Strategy Expand market shareIncrease market penetration/
Marketing is the key function
Defend market share / Costs
and marketing effectiveness
are important
Secure productivity/ Cost
control decisive
Marketing Costs High High Descending Low
Pressure on Publicity Market preferences Brand loyalty Rationalizing
Distribution Selective / specialized Intensive Intensive Selective
Price High Relatively high Descending to low point Low, rarely ascending
Products Basic Model Improved Differentiated Rationalized
Production
Over capacities/ No Series /
relatively high Qualification of
staff
Lack of capacities / Transition
to mass-production
Optimal size / large Series / low
qualification of workers
Overcapacities / mass-
production
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Life Cycle Analysis (3)
5IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Co
st
per
pie
ce
Production Scope (cummulated)
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Learning Curve Analysis
6IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Is the Resscource or Skill …
Of Value? rare?Difficcult to imitate?
extractable?Implicationen for Competition
PresumedPerformance
Competence Level
No - - NoCompetition Disadvantage
Under Norm ValueCompetence1. Order
Yes No - Competition Equality Norm Value
Competence2. Order
Yes Yes NoTemporary Competition Advantage
Above Norm Value
Core Competence
Yes Yes Yes YesConstant Competition Advantage
Clearly Above Norm Value
Analysis of strategic competitiveness–
tools – Core Competence Analysis
7IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Structure
Staff
SharedValues
SystemsStrategy
Skills Style
„Hard“ factors
„Soft“ factors
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
8IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Structure
Staff
SharedValues
SystemsStrategy
Skills Style
Structure
▪ Who will arrange the structures in the company?
▪ Corresponds to the real structure of the necessary complexity or simplicity?
▪ Is there a clear organization chart?
▪ The corporate structure is a help or a hindrance for the job?
▪ Are the competencies of the organization areas adequately defined?
▪ What structural changes are planned? Who is involved in the change process?
9IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness–
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Structure
Staff
SharedValues
SystemsStrategy
Skills Style
Systems
▪ What processes have high importance in the company?
▪ As the excellent experience in doing is assessing these processes?
▪ As the processes are organized? Are they transparent enough?
▪ Which interfaces frequently conflicts occur?
▪ What formal and informal processes are in place to implement the overall strategy?
▪ Where do you see development needs in the processes?
10IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Structure
Staff
SharedValues
SystemsStrategy
Skills Style
Style / Culture
▪ What are the rules and standards are strictly observed by staff?
▪ What are the mechanisms of reward and punishment mechanisms exist?
▪ As shapes from collaboration and cooperation within the company?
▪ What is done with errors?
▪ What is the relationship between staff?
▪ What are the qualities of leadership?
11IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey
Seven-S-Framework)
Structure
Staff
SharedValues
SystemsStrategy
Skills Style
Staff
▪ Corresponds to the actual staffing formulated the guidelines?
▪ The employees are vital capital, or simply a means to an end?
▪ Bring the strengths of the staff a competitive advantage over its competitors?
▪ Like the employees in the company is encouraged and what are the development possibilities?
▪ How high is the turnover?
▪ In what areas of development is needed on the staff?
12IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Structure
Staff
SharedValues
SystemsStrategy
Skills Style
Skills
▪ About what the company has outstanding abilities?
▪ Competitive advantages resulting from these abilities?
▪ What is the knowledge via the core capabilities in the enterprise? Is it tied to specific people?
▪ How knowledge is shared within the company? What happens to new knowledge?
▪ Are there incentive systems for knowledge processing and dissemination of knowledge?
▪ Which knowledge management systems exist in the company?
13IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Structure
Staff
SharedValues
SystemsStrategy
Skills Style
Strategie
▪ How to shape vision and strategy of the company?
▪ To what extent the intended strategy and the secondary targets are known to the employees?
▪ How big is the opportunity to implement the desired shortterm strategy?
▪ If there are opposing goals?
▪ Is the strategy likely to create challenges in the future?
▪ Is the company clearly enough defined?
▪ Who develops the strategies in the company? Which people and departments are the driversof development?
14IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Checklist for hard factors
Strategy
▪ How to shape vision and strategy of the company?
▪ To what extent the intended strategy and the secondary targets are known to the employees?
▪ How big is the opportunity to implement the desired short-term strategy?
▪ If there are opposing goals?
▪ Is the strategy likely to create challenges in the future?
▪ Is the company clearly enough defined?
▪ Who develops the strategies in the company?Which people and departments are the drivers of development?
Structure
▪ Who will arrange the structures in the company?
▪ Corresponds to the real structure of the necessary complexity or simplicity?
▪ Is there a clear organization chart?
▪ The corporate structure is a help or a hindrance for the job?
▪ Are the competencies of the organization areas adequately defined?
▪ What structural changes are planned? Who is involved in the change process?
Systems
▪ What processes have high importance in the company?
▪ As the excellent experience in doing is assessing these processes?
▪ As the processes are organized? Are they transparent enough?
▪ Which interfaces frequently conflicts occur?
▪ What formal and informal processes are in place to implement the overallstrategy?
▪ Where do you see development needs in the processes?
1 2 3
15IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness–
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Checklist for hard factors
Skills
▪ About what the company has outstanding abilities?
▪ Competitive advantages resulting from these abilities?
▪ What is the knowledge via the core capabilities in the enter-prise? Is it tied to specific people?
▪ How knowledge is shared within the company? What happens to new knowledge?
▪ Are there incentive systems for knowledge processing and dissemination of knowledge?
▪ Which knowledge management systems exist in the company?
4 Staff
▪ Corresponds to the actual staffing formulated the guidelines?
▪ The employees are vital capital, or simply a means to an end?
▪ Bring the strengths of the staff a competitive advantage over its competitors?
▪ Like the employees in the company is encouraged and what are the development possibilities?
▪ How high is the turnover?
▪ In what areas of development is needed on the staff?
5 Style and Culture
▪ What are the rules and standards are strictly observed by staff?
▪ What are the mechanisms of reward and punishment mechanisms exist?
▪ As shapes from collaboration and cooperation within the company?
▪ What is done with errors?
▪ What is the relationship between staff?
▪ What are the qualities of leadership?
▪ Does the leadership style to the targeted company culture?
6 Shared Values
▪ What are the common values of the company?
▪ What are the company's philosophy and what self-characterizes the company?
▪ Share the employees an understanding via these values?
▪ If the development of values in a more rigid frame, or it is dynamic and adaptable?
▪ Suitable values in order to promote enterprise culture?
7
16IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – 7-S-Model (McKinsey Seven-S-Framework)
Staff Skills Style Shared Values Systems Structure Strategy
Strategy … … … … … … …
Structure … … … … … …
Systems … … … … …
Shared Values … … … …
Style … … …
Skills … …
Staff …
17IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Value Chain Analysis
Image of business Model of value chain1
Analysis of Cost Position and value creation 2
Identification of differenciation possibilities of value chain activitiy3
Analysis of Technology Niveaus of value chain activities4
Determination of success-critical value chain activities5
Derivation of concrete recommendations of action6
18IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Market Growth / Market Share Portfolio Analysis
Question Marks
Poor Dogs
Stars
Cash Cows
1
-
+- Relative Market Share
Ma
rke
t Gro
wth
+
Accumulated Units
Co
sts
/Pie
ce
Business Field
Life Cycle
Tim
e
Market - /Sales Volume
19IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Market Growth / Market Share Portfolio Analysis
Evaluation of the position of the Business Unit
Revenue of Business Unit
Revenue of strongest CompetitorRelative Market Share =
Evaluation of Market Attractiveness through Market Growth
Market volume – Market volume previous year
Market volume previous yearMarket Growth = x100
20IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Competition Strength Portfolio Analysis
Success Factors
Weighting Evaluation
Noteslow medium high
poor neutral good
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Market Volume
Market Growth
Profit Potential of
Market
Innovation Potential
of Market
Competition
Behaviour
Sensitivity to
Economic Activity
Substitution
Possibilities
Customer Behaviour
Supply Security
Government
Influences
Just move spheres
depending on
characteristics to left/right
Just move spheres
depending on
characteristics to left/right
21IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Stakeholder Analysis
Stakeholder
Support of the Project Influence on the Project
Expected Behaviour
++ + o - -- highmoderat
eslight
22IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Benchmarking
Form of Benchmarking …
Objective of Benchmarking …
Benchmarking
ObjectTarget Figure
Benchmarking
Partner
Value of
BenchmarksOwn Value Gap Absolute
Gap in %
of own Value
Possible
MeasuresResponsible Target Date
23IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Analysis of external Market Forces
4. Supplier
Bargaining power of Supplier
2. Competitor in the field
Rivalry among existing companies
1. Potential new competitors
Threat of new competitors
3. Substitution Products
Threat by Substitution Products
5. Customer
Bargaining power of customer
24IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Analysis of external Market Forces
Competition
Dimensions
Influencal Factors on
Competition DimensionsShort Characterization of Industry
Potential
Competition
Marketentry berriers for new Competition are:
▪ Economies of Scale
▪ Product differences, detectible in the appropriate Customer Loyalty
▪ High equity requirements to enter the market
▪ Conversion Costs for Customer when Changing to a different Product
▪ Unusually good and expensive Sales chanels
▪ Size-independent Cost Advantages (Patents, Commodities, Location,
Subventions, Official barriers)
New
Competition
Intensive Rivaliary results from:
▪ Many simmilar Competitioners
▪ Weak Growth of Industry
▪ High dixed costs and high Reserve Capacity
▪ Differentiation between the Competition just about the Price
▪ High strategic insets (Market Share winnings no matter how)
▪ High Exit barriers
Risk of
Substitution
Risk of Substitution happens by:
▪ real or potentially attractive Substitute Products
▪ offensive Marketing für Substitute Products and Services
▪ Impossible Defense of Substitute Products e.g with uniform Standards,
blocking of Sales chanels and so on.
▪ New Products through Technologie Development
25IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Analysis of external Market Forces
Competition
Dimensions
Influencal Factors on
Competition DimensionsShort Characterization of Industry
Supplier
Factors that may raise the bargaining power of supplier:
▪ high competition advantages of delivered products
▪ poor number of potential suppliers
▪ high meaning of products for the quality of products of customer
▪ high conversion costs when changing the supplier
▪ poor meaning of customer for the supplier
▪ believable interest on forward integration
Customer
Factors that may raise the Bargaining power of Customer:
▪ high market power on the side of customer
▪ a large selection of alternative supplier for the customer (Standardized
exchangeable Products)
▪ cost and market transparency for Customer (example: market places)
▪ view customers appear concentrated
▪ low conversion costs and risks for the customer when changing supplier
▪ high share of industry products on overall costs of customer (strategic
purchasing policy)
▪ Earning problems on the side of customers that they want to transfer to the
supplier.
▪ Believable threat of backwards integration in the value chain
26IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness tools
Analysis of external Market Forces
Industry Attractiveness
Now Future
lowmediu
mhigh low
mediu
mhigh
Entry Barriers
Exit Barriers
Rivalary of Competition
Bargaining Power of Customer
Bargaining Power of Supplier
Availability of Substitute Products
Public Measures
Overall Evaluation
27IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Strategic Positioning / Generic strategies
DifferentiationComprehensive
Cost Leadership
Concentration on Specialties
1
3
2
Singularity from
Customers Point of View
Ind
ustr
y-w
ide
Lim
ita
tio
n to
on
e S
egm
en
t
Strategic Advantage
Str
ate
gic
Ta
rge
t O
bje
ct
Cost Advantage
28IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Strategic Positioning / Generic strategies
Strategy TypesComprehensive
Cost LeadershipDifferentiation
Concentration
on Specialties
Usually demanded
capabilities and resources
▪ High investment and access to asset
▪ Process inovations and process
improvements
▪ Intensive supervision of workforce
▪ Products created under the aspect of
simple production
▪ Cost effective sales system
▪ Good marketing abilities
▪ Product engineering
▪ Creativity
▪ Strong basic research
▪ Good reputition for quality and
technological leading position
▪ Long industry tradition or unique
combination of skills of other
industries
▪ Close cooperation with supply and
sales chanels
▪ Combination of mentioned
measures, aimed for the strategic
target object
Usual orgenizational
requirements
▪ Intensive Cost Control
▪ Mostly detailed Control reports
▪ Clear structured organization and
responsibilities
▪ incentive system for the strict
fulfillment of quantitative objectives
▪ Strict coordination of activities in
F&E, Product development and
Marketing
▪ Subjective evaluation and incentive
instead of quantitative criterias
▪ Amenities, to attract high qualified,
economical and creative employees
▪ Combination of mentioned
measures, aimed for the strategic
target object
29IEC - Institute of Executive Capabilities der Steinbeis-Hochschule Berlin SHB
Analysis of strategic competitiveness
tools – Strategic Positioning / Generic strategies
▪ ABC-Analysis
▪ Life Cycle Analysis
▪ Learning Curve Analysis
▪ Cost Structure Analysis
▪ Satisfaction Analysis
▪ Company Structure Analysis
▪ Core Competence Analysis
▪ 7-S-Modell
▪ Value Chain Analysis
▪ Market Growth / Market Share
Portfolio Analysis
▪ Industry Attractiveness/
Competition Strength
Portfolio Analysis
▪ Further Portfolio Analysis
▪ Strength and Weaknesses Analysis
▪ Environmental Analysis
▪ Target Group Analysis
▪ Competition Analysis
▪ Substitution Analysis
▪ Stakeholder-Analysis
▪ Benchmarking
▪ Structural Analysis