tom torlakson state superintendent of public instruction state of california annual performance...
DESCRIPTION
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction APR Overview-Cont. Data for the APR indicators are collected from a variety of sources: California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement System (CALPADS) California Special Education Management Information System (CASEMIS) Assessment data base Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH)TRANSCRIPT
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
State of California
Annual Performance ReportIndividuals with Disabilities
Education Act of 2004Federal Fiscal Year 2012
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
APR Overview
• The Annual Performance Plan (APR) is prepared using instructions from the U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP)
• The APR consists of 20 Indicators• Indicators are categorized as either
compliance (10) or performance (10):• Targets for compliance indicators are set by OSEP
at either zero percent or one hundred percent• Targets for performance indicators are set in
collaboration with the various stakeholder groups
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
APR Overview-Cont.• Data for the APR indicators are collected from a
variety of sources:• California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement System
(CALPADS)• California Special Education Management Information
System (CASEMIS)• Assessment data base• Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH)
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
APR Data Years
• The current APR reflects data collected during Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2012, (equivalent to California’s school year 2012–13).
• Several indicators are reported in lag years using data from school year 2011−12.
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
APR Executive Summary
• The APR Executive Summary provides a concise overview of California’s annual report to OSEP and includes:• Demographic information of California’s
special education population• A description of each indicator
• How the indicator is measured• Targets for each indicator• Reported results • Improvement activities
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Special Education by Disability2012–13
6
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Special Education by Ethnicity 2012–13
7Data Source: December CASEMIS
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 1 Graduation Rates
• Performance Indicator• Target: 74.5 percent of students will
graduate from high school with a regular diploma
• FFY 2012: 78.13 percent graduated with a regular diploma
–FFY 2011: 76.3 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 2 Drop Out Rates
• Performance Indicator• Target: Less than 21.1 percent will drop
out of school• FFY 2012: 17.9 percent dropped out
–FFY 2011 rate: 18.4 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 3Statewide Assessments
• Performance Indicator• Three areas are measured:
– 3A percent of AYP objectives met– 3B participation rates– 3C percent proficient by school
subgroups
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 3A
• Percent of districts that meet the AYP objectives for ELA and Mathematics for the disability subgroup– Target: Fifty-eight percent of districts
meet AYP for the special education subgroup
– FFY 2012 rate: 8.2 percent
– FFY 2011 rate: 11.12 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 3B
• Rate of participation on statewide assessments– Target: Ninety-five percent of students
with IEPs participate in statewide assessments
– FFY 2012: 97.4 percent ELA 98.2 percent Math
– FFY 2011 rate: 97.8 percent ELA 98.3 percent Math
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 3CProficient by School Subgroup -
Elementary1. Elementary districts
• Target: 89.2 percent of students with IEPs score proficient in ELA and 89.5 percent in Math
• FFY 2012: 38.7 percent ELA 42.0 percent Math
– FFY 2011: 38.7 percent ELA 38.8 percent Math
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 3CProficient by School Subgroup – High
School
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 3CProficient by School Subgroup –
Unified and County Offices
3. Unified districts and county offices of education
• Target: 89 percent of students with IEPs score proficient in ELA and 89.1 percent in Math
• FFY 2012: 35.6 percent ELA 38.3 percent Math–FFY 2011: 33.3 percent ELA
35.0 percent Math
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 4 Suspension and Expulsion
• Performance Indicator– 4A is the percent of districts that have a
significant discrepancy overall in the rate of suspension/expulsion of greater than 10 days when compared to the state rate
– 4B is the discrepancy in terms of race/ethnicity rates as a result of inappropriate identification
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 4A
• Target: No more than 10.1 percent of districts will have a significant discrepancy in 10 day+ suspensions/expulsions overall
• FFY 2012: 2.51% overall rate
– FFY 2011: 2.7 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 4B
• Target: Zero percent of districts will have a discrepancy in suspension/expulsions by race or ethnicity that is a result of inappropriate identification
• FFY 2012: Pending districts completing a review of policies, practices, and procedures
– FFY 2011: .87 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Environment
• Performance Indicator• For ages 6 through 21 years, measures
time inside the regular education classroom by:– 5A: Eighty percent or more of the day– 5B: Less than forty percent of the day– 5C: In separate school, residential
facility, or homebound/hospital
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5A LRE – 80 Percent or More
• Target: Seventy-six percent or more of students with an IEP will be served in the regular classroom eighty percent or more of the day
• FFY 2012: 52.6 percent
– FFY 2011: 52.3 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5B LRE – Less than 40 Percent
• Target: No more than nine percent of students with an IEP will be served in the regular classroom less than forty percent of the day
• FFY 2012: 22.1 percent
– FFY 2011: 22.1 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5C LRE – Separate Schools
• Target: No more than 3.8 percent of students are served in separate schools, residential placements, or homebound/hospital
• FFY 2012: 4.0 percent
– FFY 2011: 4.2 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
23
Educational Environment for all Special Education Students 2012–13
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 6Preschool Least Restrictive Environment
• Performance Indicator• A: Percent of students aged 3
through 5 receiving the majority of special education in a regular childhood program
• B: Percent of students receiving special education in a separate class, school, or residential facility
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 6A - Preschool LREServices in Regular Classroom
• Target: This is the base line year for this indicator
• FFY 2012: 38.8 percent served in regular childhood program
– FFY 2011: 20.2 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 6B - Preschool LREServices in Separate Location
• Target: This is the base line year for this indicator
• FFY 2012: 35.9 percent served in separate classroom, school, or facility
– FFY 2011: 25.6 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 7Preschool Assessment
• Performance Indicator• Outcome A: Positive social-emotional
skills• Outcome B: Acquisition and use of
knowledge and skills• Outcome C: Use of appropriate
behaviors to meet their needs
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 7 - Outcome APositive Social/Emotional Skills
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 7 - Outcome BAcquisition and Use of Knowledge
and Skills• Target: Of the children entering below age
expectations, 70 percent substantially increased their rate of growth and 82.5 percent are functioning within age expectations
• FFY 2012: Pending• Pending
– FFY 2011: 71.7 percent 74.4 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 7 - Outcome CUse of Appropriate Behaviors to Meet
Their Needs• Target: Of the children entering below
age expectations, 75 percent substantially increased their rate of growth and 79 percent are functioning within age expectations
• FFY 2012: Pending
– FFY 2011: 75 percent 77.2 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 8Parent Involvement
• Performance Indicator• Target: Ninety percent of parents
report the school facilitated parent involvement
• FFY 2012: 98.9 percent
– FFY 2011: 98.8 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 9 Disproportionality
• Compliance Indicator• Target: Zero percent of districts will
have disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups that is a result of inappropriate identification
• FFY 2012: Pending districts completing a review of policies, practices, and procedures
– FFY 2011: .21 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 10Disproportionality by Race/Ethnicity
• Compliance Indicator• Target: Zero percent of districts will have
disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups within a disability, which are a result of inappropriate identification
• FFY 2012: Pending
– FFY 2011: .87 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 11Child Find
• Compliance Indicator• Target: Eligibility will be completed
within 60 days for one hundred percent of students for whom parental consent to evaluate was received
• FFY 2011: 97.4 percent
– FFY 2010: 95.8 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 12Part B to Part C Transition
• Compliance Indicator• Target: One hundred percent of
students referred by IDEA Part C to Part B prior to age three, if found eligible, will have an IEP developed by their third birthday
• FFY 2012: 98.2 percent
– FFY 2011: 97.8 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 13Post-Secondary Transition
• Compliance Indicator• Target: One hundred percent of
students sixteen years and older have IEPs that include appropriate post-secondary goals
• FFY 2012: 87.3 percent
– FFY 2011: 80.7 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 14Post Secondary Outcomes
• Performance Indicator• Target: Sixty-nine percent of students,
one year post secondary, are enrolled in higher education, or competitively employed, or in other employment
• FFY 2012: 80.5 percent
– FFY 2011: 80.7 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 15General Supervision
• Compliance Indicator• Target: One hundred percent of
noncompliance were corrected within one year of identification
• FFY 2012: Pending
– FFY 2011: 97.9 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 16Written Complaints Resolved
• Compliance Indicator• Target: One hundred percent of
written complaints were resolved within a 60-day time line
• FFY 2012: Pending
– FFY 2011: 100 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 17Due Process
• Compliance Indicator• Target: One hundred percent of due
process hearing requests were adjudicated within the 45-day time line
• FFY 2012: Pending
– FFY 201: 100 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 18Resolution Settlements
• Performance Indicator• Target: Fifty-five percent of hearing
requests that went to resolution sessions were resolved through settlement agreements
• FFY 2012: Pending
– FFY 2011: 12.3 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 19Mediation
• Performance Indicator• Target: Eighty-five percent of
mediation conferences resulted in mediation agreements
• FFY 2012: Pending
– FFY 2011: 63.1 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 20State Reported Data
• Compliance Indicator• Target: One hundred percent of state
reported data are on time and accurate• FFY 2012: CDE does not calculate this
indicator
– FFY 2011: 100 percent
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction Results Driven
Accountability
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
OSEP’s proposals for RDA are out for review
• As we have mentioned, OSEP has been reconceptualizing its accountability system.
• Previously, OSEP’s accountability system, including the SPP/APR, was heavily focused on compliance with limited focus on how the requirements impacted results
• Results Driven Accountability (RDA), is aligned to support States in improving results for students with disabilities.
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Summary of Changes• Combine the SPP and APR into one
document • One systems description, inclusive of all of a
States systems• States are no longer required to report on
Improvement Activities for each indicator• Eliminating Indicators 15, 16,17 and 20• Adding a new Indicator 17 – Results Driven
Accountability– Implemented in three phases– SPP/APR must include a State Systemic Improvement
Plan (SSIP) – States must assess the capacity of their infrastructure to
increase the capacity of LEAs
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Adding a New Indicator 17• Indicator 17 – Results Driven Accountability• Implemented in three phases• SPP/APR must include a State Systemic Improvement
Plan (SSIP) that is a comprehensive, ambitious yet achievable plan for improving results for students with disabilities
• States must assess the capacity of their infrastructure to increase the capacity of LEAs to – implement, – scale up, and – sustain evidence-based practices
• The primary focus of SSIP is on improvement of student outcomes.
• State must also address how the State will use its general supervision systems to improve implementation of the requirements of Part B of the IDEA
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Proposed Phase-in of Indicator 17
FFY 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018Submitted in February 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
Phase III
•Results of ongoing evaluation and revisions to the SPP
Indicator 1Indicator 2Indicator 3Indicator 4Indicator 5Indicator 6Indicator 7Indicator 8Indicator 9Indicator 10Indicator 11...Indicator 20
FFY 2012Submitted in February 2014
FFY 2013Submitted in February 2015
FFY 2014Submitted in February 2016
Phase I
•Data Analysis •Identification of Focus for Improvement
•Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity
•Theory of Action.
Phase II
•Infrastructure Development
•Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices
•Evaluation Plan
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction New Targets Proposed
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Comparison of Large State Performance Indicator Targets
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
5 Minute Exercise
• Turn to a neighbor or friend• Review the chart comparing the
large state targets• What occurs to you as a result of
your review of this information?
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Summary of Performance Indicators 2005 - 2011
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Least Restrictive Environment Dec12 Indicator 5 - Breakout by District of Accountability - Children with IEPs, ages 6 through 21 only
District of Accountability (DOA) Type
Inside Regular Class 80% of
the time or more
Inside Regular Class 40% of
the time or less
Separate Schools, Residential Facilities, Homebound/Hospital
Placement
Inside Regular Class 41%
through 79% of the time
DOA Type Total
Charter School as LEAs 7,813 373 138 548 8,872County Office of Education 969 179 318 105 1,571Elementary 63,368 25,920 1,986 17,256 108,530High 25,741 17,599 2,983 16,807 63,130Other 0 0 35 0 35Unified 223,798 96,253 19,533 85,378 424,962
Totals 321,689 140,324 24,993 120,094 607,100
District of Accountability (DOA) Type
Inside Regular Class 80% of
the time or more
Inside Regular Class 40% of
the time or less
Separate Schools, Residential Facilities,
or Homebound/ Hospital Placement
Inside Regular Class 41%
through 79% of the time
DOA Type of the Total Students with IEPs and
ages 6-21
Charter School as LEAs 88.06 4.20 1.56 6.18 1.46County Office of Education 61.68 11.39 20.24 6.68 0.26Elementary 58.39 23.88 1.83 15.90 17.88High 40.77 27.88 4.73 26.62 10.40Other 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.01Unified 52.66 22.65 4.60 20.09 70.00
Totals 52.99 23.11 4.12 19.78 100.00
Denominator Total Students with IEPs and ages 6-21 607,100
Number of Students
Percent of Students
LRE Indicator Comparison by District Type 2012-13
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
ElementaryInside Regular Class
80% of the time or more
Inside Regular Class 40% of the time or
less
Separate Schools, Residential Facilities,
or Homebound/ Hospital Placement
2012 58.4 23.9 1.82011 58.6 23.2 1.82010 59.2 23.1 1.8
High SchoolInside Regular Class
80% of the time or more
Inside Regular Class 40% of the time or
less
Separate Schools, Residential Facilities,
or Homebound/ Hospital Placement
2012 40.8 27.9 4.72011 40.5 27.9 5.02010 39.7 27.7 5.3
UnifiedInside Regular Class
80% of the time or more
Inside Regular Class 40% of the time or
less
Separate Schools, Residential Facilities,
or Homebound/ Hospital Placement
2012 52.7 22.6 4.62011 52.4 22.6 4.72010 53.1 23.7 4.8
StatewideInside Regular Class
80% of the time or more
Inside Regular Class 40% of the time or
less
Separate Schools, Residential Facilities,
or Homebound/ Hospital Placement
2012 53.0 23.1 4.12011 52.7 23.0 4.22010 52.8 23.9 4.3
LRE Indicator Comparison by District Type
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
DOA LRE 80% or More of the
Time
DOA Data Population
Percent Of DOA
Population at 80% or More
Percentile Range
Percentile cut point
3768338 8304 12836 64.69 >75th 95.74 100th1964725 4383 7819 56.06 50 to 75th 64.43 75th1062166 3685 6690 55.08 50 to 75th 55.03 50th3467314 3229 6036 53.50 25 to 50th 46.18 25th3868478 3782 5832 64.85 >75th 25.09 0th3367033 2567 5302 48.42 25 to 50th3066670 2536 5275 48.08 25 to 50th3467439 2968 5177 57.33 50 to 75th3467447 2346 4933 47.56 25 to 50th3667876 2693 4857 55.45 50 to 75th3667710 1747 4577 38.17 <25th0161259 2473 4466 55.37 50 to 75th3066522 2137 4460 47.91 25 to 50th3367215 1720 4331 39.71 <25th3066464 2208 4285 51.53 25 to 50th3367124 1742 3893 44.75 <25th3667678 1959 3773 51.92 25 to 50th0761796 2105 3441 61.17 50 to 75th0761754 2003 3406 58.81 50 to 75th3375192 1822 3353 54.34 25 to 50th3768296 1717 3331 51.55 25 to 50th3476505 1880 3287 57.20 50 to 75th3968676 1472 3118 47.21 25 to 50th4369666 1945 3070 63.36 50 to 75th3968585 1630 3016 54.05 25 to 50th3768452 1404 2947 47.64 25 to 50th3073635 1030 2878 35.79 <25th1964808 1413 2833 49.88 25 to 50th
Selected Large Unified Districts Percentile Rank in LRE Indicator 80% or More in Regular Class
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Comments?
57