tom peters’ we are in a brawl with no rules nmfn/chicago/01.25.2003

61
Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Upload: neo

Post on 12-Jan-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003. Thank You & Godspeed !. Slides at … tompeters.com. NMFN.com/Risk Tolerance Calculator : 51. “We are in a brawl with no rules.” Paul Allaire. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Tom Peters’

We Are in a Brawl with No RulesNMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Page 2: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Thank You &

Godspeed!

Page 3: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Slides at …

tompeters.com

Page 4: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

NMFN.com/Risk Tolerance Calculator:

51

Page 5: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“We are in a

brawl with no rules.”

Paul Allaire

Page 6: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“IT MAY SOMEDAY BE SAID THAT THE 21ST CENTURY BEGAN ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. …

“Al-Qaeda represents a new and profoundly dangerous kind of

organization—one that might be called a ‘virtual state.’ On September 11 a virtual

state proved that modern societies are vulnerable as never before.”—Time/09.09.2002

Page 7: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“The deadliest strength of America’s new adversaries is their very fluidity, Defense Secretary Donald

Rumsfeld believes. Terrorist networks, unburdened by fixed borders, headquarters or conventional forces, are

free to study the way this nation responds to threats and adapt themselves to prepare for what Mr. Rumsfeld is certain will be another attack. …

“ ‘Business as usual won’t do it,’ he said. His answer is to develop swifter, more lethal ways

to fight. ‘Big institutions aren’t swift on their feet in adapting but rather ponderous and clumsy

and slow.’ ”—The New York Times/09.04.2002

Page 8: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

From: Weapon v. Weapon

To: Org structure v. Org structure

Page 9: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Eric Shiseki’s Army

Flat.Fast.Agile.Adaptable.Light … But Lethal.Talent-centric/ “I Am An Army of One.”Info-intense.Network-centric.

Page 10: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Dawn Meyerreicks, CTO of the Defense Intelligence Systems Agency, made one of the most fateful military calls of the 21st century. After 9/11 … her office

quickly leased all the available transponders covering Central Asia. The implications should change everything about U.S. military thinking in the

years ahead.

“The U.S. Air Force had kicked off its fight against the Taliban with an ineffective bombing campaign, and Washington was anguishing over whether to send in a few Army divisions. Donald Rumsfeld told Gen. Tommy Franks to

give the initiative to 250 Special Forces already on the ground. They used satellite phones, Predator surveillance drones, and GPS- and laser-based

targeting systems to make the air strikes brutally effective.

“In effect, they ‘Napsterized’ the battlefield by cutting out the middlemen (much of the military’s command and control) and working directly with the

real players. … The data came in so fast that HQ revised operating procedures to allow intelligence analysts and attack planners to work directly

together. Their favorite tool, incidentally, was instant messaging over a secure network.”—Ned Desmond/“Broadband’s New Killer App”/Business

2.0/ OCT2002

Page 11: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

1. The Destruction Imperative.

Page 12: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Forbes100 from 1917 to 1987: 39 members of the Class of ’17 were alive

in ’87; 18 in ’87 F100; 18 F100 “survivors” underperformed the market

by 20%; just 2 (2%), GE & Kodak, outperformed the market 1917 to 1987.

S&P 500 from 1957 to 1997: 74 members of the Class of ’57 were

alive in ’97; 12 (2.4%) of 500 outperformed the market from 1957 to 1997.

Source: Dick Foster & Sarah Kaplan, Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market

Page 13: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Mr. Foster and his McKinsey colleagues collected detailed

performance data stretching back 40 years for 1,000 U.S. companies. They

found that none of the long-term survivors managed to outperform the market. Worse, the longer companies had been in the database, the worse

they did.”—Financial Times/11.28.2002

Page 14: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“It’s just a fact: Survivors underperform.”

—Dick Foster

Page 15: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Just Say No …

“I don’t intend to be known as the ‘King of

the Tinkerers.’ ”CEO, large financial services company/New York

Page 16: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

2. IS/ IT/ Web

… “On the Bus” or “Off the Bus.”

Page 17: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“The organizations we created have become tyrants. They have taken

control, holding us fettered, creating barriers that hinder rather than help our businesses. The lines that we drew on our neat organizational diagrams have turned into walls

that no one can scale or penetrate or even peer over.” —Frank Lekanne Deprez &

René Tissen, Zero Space: Moving Beyond Organizational Limits.

Page 18: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Ebusiness is about rebuilding the organization from the

ground up. Most companies today are not built to exploit the Internet.

Their business processes, their approvals, their hierarchies, the

number of people they employ … all of that is wrong for running an

ebusiness.”

Ray Lane, Kleiner Perkins

Page 19: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Case: CRM

Page 20: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“CRM has, almost universally, failed

to live up to expectations.”

Butler Group (UK)

Page 21: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

CGE&Y (Paul Cole): “Pleasant

Transaction” vs. “Systemic Opportunity.” “Better job

of what we do today” vs. “Re-think overall

enterprise strategy.”

Page 22: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Here We Go Again: Except It’s Real This Time!

Bank online: 24.3M (10.2002); 2X Y2000.

Wells Fargo: 1/3rd; 3.3M; 50% lower attrition

rate; 50% higher growth in balances than off-line; more likely to cross-purchase; “happier and

stay with the bank much longer.”

B of A: 4M of 15M (“… way beyond the early adopters”).

Source: The Wall Street Journal/10.21.2002

Page 23: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

3. The Heart of the

Value Added Revolution: PSFs Unbound/ The

“Solutions Imperative.”

Page 24: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Companies have defined so much ‘best practice’

that they are now more or less identical.”

Jesper Kunde, Unique now ... or never

Page 25: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“The ‘surplus society’ has a surplus of

similar companies, employing

similar people, with similar educational backgrounds, coming up

with similar ideas, producing

similar things, with similar prices

and similar quality.”

Kjell Nordström and Jonas Ridderstråle, Funky Business

Page 26: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Customers will try ‘low cost

providers’ … because the Majors have not

given them any clear reason not to.”

Leading Insurance Industry Analyst

Page 27: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Gerstner’s IBM: Systems Integrator of

choice. Global Services:

$35B. Pledge/’99: Business Partner Charter. 72 strategic partners,

aim for 200. Drop many in-house

programs/products. (BW/12.01).

Page 28: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Keep In Mind: Customer

Satisfaction versus

Customer

Success

Page 29: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

4. A World of Scintillating

“Experiences.”

Page 30: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Experiences are as distinct from services as services are from

goods.”Joseph Pine & James Gilmore, The Experience Economy:

Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage

Page 31: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“The [Starbucks] Fix” Is on …

“We have identified a ‘third place.’ And I really believe that sets us apart. The third place is

that place that’s not work or home. It’s the place our

customers come for refuge.”Nancy Orsolini, District Manager

Page 32: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Experience: “Rebel Lifestyle!”

“What we sell is the ability for a 43-year-old accountant to dress in black leather, ride

through small towns and have people be afraid of him.”

Harley exec, quoted in Results-Based Leadership

Page 33: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU?

Page 34: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

It’s All About EXPERIENCES: “Trapper” to “Wildlife Damage-control Professional”

Trapper: <$20 per beaver pelt.

WDCP: $150/“problem beaver”; $750-$1,000 for flood-control

piping … so that beavers can stay.

Source: WSJ/05.21.2002

Page 35: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

5. Boss Job One:

The Talent Obsession.

Page 36: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“The leaders of Great Groups love talent and know where to find it. They revel in

the talent of others.”Warren Bennis & Patricia Ward Biederman,

Organizing Genius

Page 37: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Goal of the Year No. 1*: Find-Develop-Mentor

ONE Extraordinary Person.

*CEO, large financial advisory firm, April 2001

Page 38: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“AS LEADERS, WOMEN RULE: New Studies find that female managers

outshine their male counterparts in almost

every measure”Title, Special Report, Business Week, 11.20.00

Page 39: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Women’s Strengths Match New Economy Imperatives: Link [rather than rank] workers;

favor interactive-collaborative leadership style [empowerment beats top-down decision making]; sustain fruitful collaborations; comfortable with sharing information; see redistribution of power

as victory, not surrender; favor multi-dimensional feedback; value technical & interpersonal skills, individual & group contributions equally; readily accept ambiguity; honor intuition as well as pure

“rationality”; inherently flexible; appreciate cultural diversity.

Source: Judy B. Rosener, America’s Competitive Secret

Page 40: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“TAKE THIS QUICK QUIZ: Who manages more things at once? Who puts more effort into their appearance? Who usually takes care of the details? Who finds it

easier to meet new people? Who asks more questions in a conversation? Who is a better

listener? Who has more interest in communication skills? Who is more inclined to get involved?

Who encourages harmony and agreement? Who has better intuition? Who works with a longer ‘to do’ list? Who enjoys a recap to the day’s events? Who is

better at keeping in touch with others?”

Source: Selling Is a Woman’s Game: 15 Powerful Reasons Why Women Can Outsell Men, Nicki Joy & Susan Kane-Benson

Page 41: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Investors are looking more and more for a relationship with their financial

advisers. They want someone they can trust, someone who listens. In my experience, in general,

women may be better at these relationship-building skills than are

men.”

Hardwick Simmons, CEO, Prudential Securities

Page 42: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

6. Trends:

Women Roar.

Page 43: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

?????????

Home Furnishings … 94%Vacations … 92% (Adventure Travel … 70%/ $55B travel

equipment)

Houses … 91%D.I.Y. (“home projects”) … 80%

Consumer Electronics … 51% Cars … 60% (90%)

All consumer purchases … 83% Bank Account … 89%

Health Care … 80%

Page 44: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

2/3rds working women/50+% working wives > 50%

80% checks61% bills

53% stock (mutual fund boom)

43% > $500K95% financial decisions/

29% single handed

Page 45: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

1970-1998

Men’s median income: +0.6%Women’s median income: + 63%

Source: Martha Barletta, Marketing to Women

Page 46: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

91% women: ADVERTISERS DON’T

UNDERSTAND US. (58% “ANNOYED.”)

Source: Greenfield Online for Arnold’s Women’s Insight Team (Martha Barletta, Marketing to Women)

Page 47: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

FemaleThink/ Popcorn

“Men and women don’t think the same way, don’t communicate the same

way, don’t buy for the same reasons.”

“He simply wants the transaction to take place. She’s interested in

creating a relationship. Every place women go, they make

connections.”

Page 48: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Women's View of Male Salespeople

Technically knowledgeable; assertive; get to the point; pushy;

condescending; insensitive to women’s needs.

Source: Judith Tingley, How to Sell to the Opposite Sex (Martha Barletta, Marketing to Women)

Page 49: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Read This Book …

EVEolution: The Eight Truths of Marketing to Women

Faith Popcorn & Lys Marigold

Page 50: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

EVEolution: Truth No. 1

Connecting Your Female Consumers to Each

Other Connects Them to Your Brand

Page 51: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“The ‘Connection Proclivity’ in women starts early. When asked,

‘How was school today?’ a girl usually tells her mother every

detail of what happened, while a boy might grunt, ‘Fine.’ ”

EVEolution

Page 52: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

What If …

“What if ExxonMobil or Shell dipped into their credit card database to help commuting women

interview and make a choice of car pool partners?”

“What if American Express made a concerted effort to connect up female empty-nesters

through on-line and off-line programs, geared to help women re-enter the workforce with today’s

skills?”

EVEolution

Page 53: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Women don’t buy

brands. They join them.”

EVEolution

Page 54: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

F.Y.I.

Page 55: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Women Beat Men at Art of Investing”

Source: Miami Herald, reporting on a study by Profs. Terrance Odean and Brad Barber, UC Davis (Cause: Guys are “in and out” of

stocks more often; women choose carefully and hold on for the long term)

Page 56: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Value Line: Top State* Investment Clubs 2000

8 … All male19 … Coed

22 … All FEMALE

* VT & Maine not included; D.C. included

Page 57: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

1. Men and women are different.2. Very different.3. VERY, VERY DIFFERENT.4. Women & Men have a-b-s-o-l-u-t-e-l-y nothing in common.4. Women buy lotsa stuff.5. WOMEN BUY A-L-L THE STUFF.6. Women’s Market = Opportunity No. 1.7. Men are (STILL) in charge.8. MEN ARE … TOTALLY, HOPELESSLY CLUELESS ABOUT WOMEN.9. Women’s Market = Opportunity No. 1.10. NO SHIT.

Page 58: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

7. Leading:

Soft Is Hard

Page 59: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“Soft” Is “Hard”

- ISOE

Page 60: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

“A leader is a dealer in hope.”

Napoleon

(+TP’s writing room pics)

Page 61: Tom Peters’   We Are in a Brawl with No Rules NMFN/Chicago/01.25.2003

Thank You!