- Today Templars -

By Tau Larménius , Archbishop - Primate of the Gnostic Apostolic Church Templar and Johannite ( Inner Circle of the Knights Templar ), historian of the Temple.

We point out clearly that this work of historical research interests only those who are part of the descent and succession Larménius Fabré - Palaprat.

The resurgence of the order of the temple is the work of Fabré - Palaprat which relied on the charter of Larménius to authenticate an uninterrupted succession of Grand Masters of the Order, Hugues de Payens, the founder in 1118 up itself in 1804 .

The era Fabré - Palaprat , era of resurgence of the Knights Templar , will turn off after his death February 18, 1838, as you can see below.

This period of 34 years has not been easy, he will fight permanently against the representatives of Roman Catholicism who will stop trying to impose their size, as that order, instead primitive or Johannine Christianity .

A totally aberrant positioning, given the fact that it is the Roman Catholic Church which was co-architect of the destruction of the order and atrocities against the Templars, including Jacques de Molay and Geoffroy de Charnay burned on island of the city.

Today, some still say that today the Templars, the / descent Larménius Fabré - Palaprat can not be Roman Catholics .

We were recently ourselves, the object of attacks from anoth er age, for this assertion.

We wanted to, to the extent that we do not accept these statements, false and inconceivable for us, make us look Heretics, written word used against us by some officials of New Templars groups.

We keep preciously course, these writings in archive.

These attacks are the result of fundamentalist Catholics, sometimes in conjunction with Opus Dei (which they openly reference ), seeping everywhere and at the highest level, including the Neo- Templars and

current movements cause once again, those who do not take the time to reflect, in the darkness.

The reality of history must come to light, and for that, threats, some Inquisition ( back ) will not stop our expression.

That is, which prompted us to take our research to validate historically, the fact that the Templars responsible, today, can not be Roman Catholics.

The research, led us from earlier discoveries , to go beyond our initial analysis and will update, false, and thus commonly usit relocate clearly and historically, the positioning of Templars today, parentage Larménius of Fabré - Palaprat.

We have, moreover, been able to trace valid for progeny of Larménius Fabré - Palaprat the only historical lineage from early order with Hugues de Payens, until today.

*********

This research, we have, at first, have to take any descent from the beginning.

For Grand Masters, Hugues de Payens 1118 Jacques de Molay in 1298, historians do not agree on the list of these, one of the authors, added to the list some Armand de Grosse Pierre, as the 16th Grand Master in 1229 .

As the sole author, we will add, in fact, we also find in the official list, indicated by the Knights Templar ( Knight Manual - Page 250-255 ).

Here is the complete list from 1118 :

1 . Hugues de Payens, 1118, founder of the Order and the first Grand Master (Hugo Paganis) 2 . Robert Credon or Craon, 1139 (Robertus of Credonio) 3 . Eberhart des Barres, 1147 (Eberhardus Barris) 4 . Bernard Tremelay, 1151 (Bernardus Tremolaius) 5 . Bertrand de Blanchefort, 1154 (Bertrandus of Alboforti) 6 . Philip of Nablus, 1169 (Philippus Neapolitanus) 7 . Odon de Saint- Amand, 1171 (Odo - Sancto Amando) 8 . Arnauld de la Tour Red or Toroge, 1180 (Arnoldus Turri - Rubra) 9 . Jehan de Terric, 1185 (Johannes Terricus) 10 . Girard Riderfort, 1187 (Girardus Riderfortius) 11 . Robert de Sable, or Sand, 1191 (Robertus Sablaeus) 12 . Gilbert Eral or Roral of Erals, 1196 (Gilbertus Eralius) 13 . Philippe du Plessis, 1201 (Philippus of Plesseio) 14 . Guillaume de Chartres, 1217 ( Guillielmus of Carnoto ) 15 . Pierre de Montaigu or Montagu, 1218 (Petrus de Monteacuto) 16 . Armand de Grosse Pierre, 1229 (Armandus of Petragrossa) 17 . Hermann de Perigord, 1237 (Harmannus Petragorius) Regent : Guillaume de Rochefort, 1244 (Guillielmus of Rupeporti) 18 . Guillaume de Sonnac, 1247 (Guillelmus Sonneius) 19 . Renaud de Vichy or Vichiers , 1250 (Reginald Vichierus) 20 . Thomas Berald or Beraud , 1257 (Thomas Beraldus) 21 . Guillaume de Beaujeu, 1274 (Guillelmus of Bellojoco) 22 . Gaudini Theobald , 1291 (Theobaldus Gaudinius) 23 . Jacques de Molay, 1298 (Jacobus de Molaio) 24 . Jehan- Marc Larmenius of Jerusalem, 1314 (Johannes Marcus Larmenius Hierosolymitanus) 25 . Thomas Theobald of Alexandria, 1324 (Thomas - Theobaldus Alexandrinus) 26 . Arnauld de Braque, 1340, (Arnuldus Braque) 27 . Jehan de Clermont, 1349 (Johannes Claromontanus ) 28 . Bertrand Du Guesclin, 1357 ( Bertrandus Du Guesclin ) 29 . Jehan first Armagnac 1381 (Johannes Arminiacus) 30 . Bernard d' Armagnac, 1392 (Bernardus Arminiacus)

31 . Jehan II Armagnac 1419 (Joahannes Arminiacus) 32 . Jean de Croy, 1451 (Johannes Croyus) Regent : Bernard Imbault , 1472 Lieutenant General Africa (Bernardus Imbaultius) 33 . Robert Lenoncourt, 1478 (Robertus Lenoncurtius) 34 . Galeazzo Salazar, 1497 (Galeatius Salazar) 35 . Philippe de Chabot, 1516 (Philippus Chabotius) 36 . Gaspard de Saulx and Tavannes, 1544 (Gaspardus of Salciaco Tavannensis) 37 . Henry de Montmorency, 1574 (Henricus of Montemorenciaco) 38 . Charles de Valois, 1615 (Carolus Valesius) 39 . Jacques Rouxel Grancey (Jacobus Ruxellius of Granceio) 40 . Jacques -Henry Durfort, 1681, Duc de Duras (Jacobus Henricus - of Duroforti , Dux de Duras) 41. Philippe, Duke of Orleans, 1705 (Philippus, Dux Aurelianensis) 42 . Louis- Auguste de Borbon, 1724 Duke of Maine (Ludovicus - Augustus Borbonius Dux Maine) 43. Louis -Henri de Bourbon, in 1737, Prince of Condé (Ludovicus - Henricus Borbonius Condaeus) 44. Louis -François de Bourbon, 1741 Prince of Conti (Ludovicus - Franciscus - Borbonius Conty) 45. Louis- Hercules - Timoleon de Cosse, 1776, Duc de Brissac (Ludovicus - Hercules - Timoleo Cosse - Brissac) Regent : Claude -Mathieu Radix Chevillon, 1792, Lieutenant- General of Europe (Claudius - Mathaeus Radix Chevillon) 46 . Bernard- Raymond Fabre- Palaprat of Spoleto, 11/04/1804, born in Cordes (Tarn) ( Bernardus- Raymondus Fabré - Palaprat ) Regent : Sidney -Smith, 1838/1840 , British Admiral appointed by the Regent Fabré - Palaprat and unelected .

The order therefore had, since its inception, 46 Grand Masters. We then worked on the organization and structure of the Order of the Temple, which has allowed us to update the fact that the Knights Templar , was structured as a result of hierarchical strata number that some have called : Internal and External circles circles. (Page 97 - The Templar Revelation)

The hierarchy of liability order is provided by the inner circles , composed solely of ecclesiastical circles.

Particularity, the clergy, were not covered by the Bishops of the Roman Catholic Church.

Another point to note, that the Templars were regular canons , were exempt from episcopal jurisdiction .

Reminder: The first nine Templars, known as the Poor Knights of Christ, have been devoted in 1119.

Their leader, the Grand Master, was the Church responsible for the College with the Pope.

The Grand master refore could not, as a minimum, to have received episcopal consecration or equivalent authority, the title is Pope and Patriarch .

It is perfectly normal that during the general convent of 5/18/1810 analyzes the reading of the minutes of 29 vedar 691, the remaining Templar treasure, it is stated, inter alia : A senior crosse ivory and three fabric bolsters used in the ceremonies of the Order (which are attributes of Bishops). (Page 54 - Manual knight)

Also found in this manual, the definition of Intimate Set includes : The ritual Magistral, Pontifical and Patriarchal and the ritual of high militia and Profession. (Page 63 - Manual knight)

It also indicates that the anointing was done mainly by the Ecclesiastical Knights (Page 301-303 - Manual knight), and it also specifies that within houses , ecclesiastical knights did not eat at the same table those who were not clerics, called Brothers of the lower militia.

There was thus a partitioning based on membership in outer circles or inner circles (ecclesiastical).

Similarly, the command of the commander of the land, could not hold chapter is to say that the military meeting differed from the spiritual chapter.

Power was held by the inner circles (ecclesiastical), headed by the Grand Master, who was, according to the statutes of the Order, invested with the power Magistrale and Apostolic Patriarchal power (Page 180 - Lévitikon).

It was therefore necessary that prior, the Grand Master is spent, let us remember, the consecration of Jacques de Molay, in Beaune in 1265.

Fabré - Palaprat himself received by consecration, apostolic succession, by Bishop Jean Baptiste ROYER, constitutional bishop of Paris August 3, 1800. This is the esoteric and religious movement, bringing together a small number of Templars, who directed and decided the future of the order.

What was the religious orientation of the Templars ?

Over the years we know, through their contacts , thought the Templars, at least the leaders, so Circles Interiors, had evolved and had departed from the strict orthodoxy of the Roman Catholic Church.

Thus, the privileged relationship at the heart of the Holy Land with Muslims knights, who attended the same ideal , we appear to be perfectly normal.

In 1312, April 3, at which time the Order was abolished , we must recognize that we are far from the goals and rules of the Militia of Poor Knights of Christ of the origin and the passive role of guardian of the sanctuary. The last secretary of Jacques de Molay was a Muslim and it is said that Saladin himself was high Templar .

It is thus understood, much better, the animosity of the pope towards them.

In 1835, JP alumnus of the Polytechnic publishes a document entitled : (Historical Research on the Templars and their religious belief, ref: in 8 ° Paris Delaunay).

The author states that : Primitive Christianity or Johannite was the religion of the ancient Templars as it still is today ( 1835) .

We find this reference to Johannisme, among other in : (The literal translation of the statutes of the Order ..., 1 April 1813 , published in Paris in 1833 - Printing A.GUYOT , page 24), or : GM is elected General convent, among all the knights professing Catholic Apostolic religion, Johannine, and Articles (121, page 51 and 293, page 83 of the same document), for the election of other officers of the order .

Same reference in the book: (From the early Christian church and Roman Catholicism nowadays, Paris, 1833, pages 207-208) and in the publication : (Jerusalem and Rome Paris 1834).

All official written, without exception, under the Grand Mastership of Fabré - Palaprat give the same reference.

In addition to the previous , we can mention : • Speech at Paris , in a special meeting of the Knights Templar , 3 thebeth 708 (2 December 1826), by Baron Henin Cuvillers . 8vo. ° Paris, Delaunay. • The Knights Templar 1830, exhibition or religious doctrines, moral and political Primitive Christians or Johannites, ..., considered religious society, political association, and as an order of chivalry, by L. -T Asfeld . 8vo. °, Paris 1830.

• Discourse on the civil and religious history of the Templars , delivered Jan. 13, 1833, by FA Barginet, Grenoble. 8vo. ° Paris Guyot, 1833. • Doctrine of the high temple of initiation, by the Bishop of Nevers, preceptor of the great convent. 8vo. ° Paris Tillard , 1833. • Milita Templi, Departmental Report to Grand Master. 8vo. ° Moessard Paris, 1833. • Milita Templi, Order of the Temple. 8vo. ° Moessard Paris, 1834. • The Knights Templar (1313), by J. Brisset 2 vols. 8vo. ° Dupont Paris, 1837. • Order of the Temple. Manifesto of the large central and primitive convent of the Order. Declarations and Decrees. 4to. ° Moessard Paris, 1837. • Acts of the General convent of the Order of the Temple in Paris in 1836 and 1837. 18mo, Paris Chassaignon, 1837. We stop here, the list goes on. Remember that this is 1804 - Fabré Palaprat awakened to the temple and he died in 1838, the function of being a Grand Master ad vitam function. Personally, the preparation of a doctoral thesis, with the backdrop of the values of the temple, which has led me to analyze more than 120 books, articles or written records on the temple, more than 30,000 pages, I suggests that so completely identical : Primitive Christianity and Religion = Johannite Templar . This preliminary analysis is necessary for a proper understanding of the events and the struggle between Fabré - Palaprat and guards (against all odds), the Roman Catholic Church. Fabré - Palaprat has held firm despite these struggles and until 1838, the date of his death. The statutes of 1813 are then the only rules of the Militia of the Temple, to be carried throughout the empire of order ( Statutes of the Order , General convent in 1813 , 1833 edition, page 19). But from the Grand Master died (18/02/1838) Roman opponents pro- Catholic, having free rein , organize a general convent (08/06/1839) to reinstate, by order, the dimension Catholic, Apostolic Roman instead of primitive Christianity ( Catholic Religion Johannites). And they shall remove at once the 34 - year Fabré Palaprat and replace the statutes of 1813 with those of 1705.

Why ? Sub - Fabré Palaprat, the religious dimension of the order was that of the primitive Christian church (Catholic Religion Johannites) called Templar Gnostic Apostolic Church and Johannite , so the church awakened by the Grand Master (Statutes of order , General convent in 1813 , 1833 edition, page 24, article 29). By cons , in the statutes of 1705 , published only in 1840 (135 years later) , Chapter V, Section: Princes, Article 4 , it is noted : The Grand Master is elected by general convent , among the knights professed religion Catholic , Apostolic and Roman . What to think ? This coup, goes totally against the reality of history. Indeed, Roman Catholics and imposed, the Templars at the time of Fabré - Palaprat, love and revere the executioners of their predecessors, those who brought Jacques de Molay and Geoffroy de Charnay at the stake, March 18, 1314. It was also contrary to the fact that the Order of the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon was revoked unilaterally and irrefutable decision of Clement V at the Council of Vienne . Some want to argue : Parchment of Chinon. False: Parchment of Chinon, official document and kept secret by the Vatican says only the absolution of Pope Clement V to the Templars and their leaders, but does not waive any case, the dissolution of the Order, at the Council Vienna , which meant the definitive end of the Order, and as meaning , among other things " Roman Catholic order ," all Roman Catholic, claiming the status of a member of that order was excommunicated ipso facto latae sententiae by Rome. (Literal translation of the statutes of the Order ..., 1 April 1813, published in Paris in 1833 - Printing A.GUYOT, page 11) This aberration shows blatantly the mindset of these dogmatic, which as history has shown otherwise, do not hesitate to trample on human values and the teachings of Christ. Once again, Roman Catholics show, they have always been and always ready for anything, including not respect the decisions taken at the highest

level of their church, to preserve their religious dominance in the context of Christianity , which they are part , but not theirs . How to believe and follow the members of the Roman Catholic Church , which does not hesitate to deny the decrees of their superiors and get themselves in position of excommunication ? (Statutes of order, General convent in 1813, 1833 edition, page 11). There are thus two speeches, official and unofficial , which is opposed to the service of the statement of the hegemony of the Roman Catholics. Everything is also clearly stated on page 111 of the book : From the early Christian church and Roman Catholicism nowadays, Paris , 1833, which has one of the dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church , and I quote : The Church Roman church is the mother and mistress of all churches . The conclusion of this part of the analysis is clear and irrefutable, given the evidence presented above, the only assertion is that the Templars parentage Palaprat / Larménius can not, under any circumstances, refer to the church Roman Catholic, under pain of excommunication de facto. Consequences of the coup, the 06/08/1839 ? A poor result, which did nothing but cause the disintegration of order, making it off quickly, thus causing Fabré - Palaprat remains today, the 46th and last Grand Master of the Offspring Larménius. Jean Laurent in his Notepad (http://www.jlturbet.net/article-21239706.html) states : It should be noted for all the "work " Palaprat - Larménius that his direct descent is really off. His last council was held March 12, 1841 , after divided into 2 or 3 branches in 1838 . The templarisme despite this continues, but what templarisme i s it ? Templar dimension is nowadays implemented by those we call the New Templars. One can also consider that in the world, approximately 85 % of New Templars, say refer parentage Palaprat / Larménius. However, these 85%, due to ignorance or lack of analysis and research, are amalgams , confusion and therefore in error. Indeed, they attribute the articles from 1705 to the parentage Palaprat / Larménius, which , in addition to a total error , is a historical aberration. Please note that this error is still sustainable in the minds, I myself, in Porto, February 23, 2003, was misled , intentionally or not by the great master of a

neo- Templar group claiming descent Fabré - Palaprat , Fernando Pinto de Souza Fontes de OSMTH . He offered me and signed, what appeared to be a priceless present , the statutes of the Order, but again the General Statutes of 1705, and not those of 1813. There is no question, to the dock, those, who through ignorance, lack of analysis or because it suited them, have taken upon themselves the statutes of 1705, sincerely or not thinking that it was good , while only those of 1813 are legally binding for parentage Palaprat / Larménius . The reference to parentage Palaprat / Larménius, catchy, in fact, the reference to the statutes of 1813. Otherwise, the only affiliation to the Temple, which can be placed, is that of the mind and nothing else. What remains of the Temple of Fabré - Palaprat in accordanc e with the charter of Larménius ? In 1870, the last dignitary, Dr. Vernois, took the decision to release papers and few material possessions of the Order to the Imperial Archives (Archives of France today) where they still are. Since inheritance lines , reported by the New Templars groups , who claim (wrongly) succession Fabré - Palaprat are often hilarious . For the period up to 1932, we found for the phase from 1840 to 1850, Edward VII of England and George V of Hanover. Smile, Edward VII of England was born in 1841. (Title of law , no doubt, by birth ! Thus Grandmaster at the age of 1 year). Followed Narcissus Valleray, A.G.M. Vernois and a Péladan Joseph "would" was Grand Master from 1892 to 1894 again, note that, in 1891, said Péladant based on the combination of the Order of the Temple and the Pink Cross or order of the rose Catholic cross he was Sar Merodak . What relationship with the order of the temple? It was not until 1932 that three knights Belgians, Joseph Cleeremans, and Theodore Gustave Jonckbloedt Covias, claiming (again wrongly), the Offspring Fabré - Palaprat , based in Brussels , the Sovereign Military Order of the Temple, whose record appears in the Belgian monitor January 20, 1933.

This Order will have a continuous line, although chaotic until today, with among others, Fernando Pinto de Souza Fontes, always declared as Grand Master of the OSMTH in 2013. Only for France, there are now no less than 5 different groups, with the title of OSMTH or OSMTJ . The report is as follows : People who are not from the primitive Christians (Catholic Religion Johannites), as was necessary to direct the order under Fabré - Palaprat , claim no legitimacy as the new leaders of the Knights Templar, birth Palaprat / Larménius . While respecting the spirit and goodwill of its people, we are obl iged to say that these new orders, those of "Neo - Templars " are only autocréations without any real parentage. The only affiliation that we can recognize them, is that of the mind, knowing that it remains totally partial, since these groups are unaware of estate - size Fabré Palaprat. The most significant nowadays OSMTH or OSMTJ, so can not refer, in any case, a direct link, moreover, that of Fabré - Palaprat / Larménius. This is also the case with many other orders called neo - Templars. Without the quote, we can say that some are self created, without any Chevalier, regularly dubbed , is present among them. How Groups like this? In 1972, Laurent Dailliez counted in 47, I dare to count in 2013. In addition, The Vatican is always very attentive to everything that concerns the Order of the Temple and its resurgence under different names, as well, ROME entrusts certain ecclesiastical monitoring these groups closely. Cardinal WEAVER had also been instructed by ROME, monitor Templar resurgence and study in depth the process of contacting different associations Templar, with the aim to infiltrate to see them back. In conclusion, the Order of the Temple and the title of Knight Tem plar, sparked such interest, that many (group leaders) do everything and anything, to adorn , starting with the non-compliance of historicity and continuing through intergroup strife , while all are all " Knights Templar of Jerusalem " say.

In addition , most members of these groups are so happy to be able to wear a beautiful cape with a red cross, and say Templars, the y simply follow the " imposed de facto " movement , without asking Quest ions and without analysis, as we do now . Hopefully they will take the opportunity of these few pages out of the darkness . Where is today, "The Order of the Temple", filiation Larménius of Fabré - Palaprat ? For this it must be remembered that in 1828 , the order had taken the name of the Church of the early Christians called Templar Gnostic Apostolic Church and johannite ( Wikipedia) . It is therefore necessary to examine exactly what happened to the Church of the Primitive Christian Church or Apostolic Gnostic Templar and Johannite, knowing that its perpetuation is, Bishop in Bishop, like all apostolic heritage, the first of list Fabré - Palaprat, which as stated earlier, received consecration in apostolic succession, by Bishop Jean Baptiste ROYER, constitutional bishop of Paris August 3, 1800. To do this, just read pages 19-24 of the book of Bishop Paul Sanda (Ritual Healing archangels, Grand Grimoire Archbishops, Editions Trajectory - 2012). Here it is : - Bernard- Raymond Fabre- Palaprat (born String , May 29, 1773, and

died in Pau, February 18, 1838), who was ordained in 1793 by Bishop John Danglars, constitutional bishop of Lot. In 1804 Bernard -Raymond founded the Church johannite early Christian named more occult, since 1812, Templar Gnostic Apostolic Church and johannite, which grow under that name or under the abbreviated name Templar Church johannite. Dr. Fabré - Palaprat practiced medicine at the court of Napoleon. According to the records of the National Library in Paris, he also received the Legion of Honor in 1814 for heroic conduct during the siege of Paris. It is in this same year of 1814, ten years after its foundation, therefore, that the early Christian Church johannite was officially recognized by the French government. Whether as a doctor, official, esoteric practitioner or as Patriarch to the Church johannite Bishop Bernard- Raymond Fabre- Palaprat always beautifully projected the deeper meaning of his spiritual journey in the service of the community. It is in 1831, after the July Revolution, he published the Evangelikon, a Gnostic version of the Gospel of John, preceded by a commentary written by Nicéphore - Athens Greek monk - who bore the

name of Levitikon. Fabré - Palaprat claimed to have bought the vellum manuscript (allegedly dated fifteenth century) in Paris, at a bookstall on New Year's Day 1804. It is in 1834 that Fabré - Palaprat introduced in his particular Church johannite Mass Gnostic ritual heralding the Mass for Three Chalices still used today in the churches Rosicruciennes Trinity Sunday . In his old age, this esoteric doctor Cathar left Paris to retire to Pau, where many heretics were able to escape the fires of oppression. He died there in good company, February 18, 1838. It is in 1810 that transmits the apostolic succession ...

- Jean Machault (1770-1845) as bailiff of Jutland, coadjutor of the primitive Church Johannine Christians. He became primate of the Church in 1814. February 20, 1831, assisted by Bernard- Raymond Fabre- Palaprat he will devote as Primate of the Gauls ... - Franz Ferdinand Châtel Toussaint (1795-1857). Bishop Châtel was a priest in the Catholic Church in France since 1818 . He founded in 1831 the French Catholic Church. He will devote as Primate of the Albigensian Church, June 24, 1836 ... - Michel -Henri d'Adhemar ( 1801-1900 ) . Already priest of the Church johannite now Primate of this Church, Bishop Adhemar walked quietly but long primacy ... It is February 2, 1857 he passed the apostolic succession ... - Manuel Lopez de Brion (1830-1874) , received neo- Cathar bishop in the town of Albi. It is February 2, 1860, Bishop Manuel Lopez Brion transmits the apostolic succession of the Albigensian Church ... - Bernard Clément ( 1831-1911 ) . The bishop discrete Clement , who was the master of the occult and secret esoteric Arnold Krumm - Heller, became the largest primate of the Church johannite primitive Christians. He remained until 1907 , when a great council could meet in Lyon. It was on this occasion that His Grace B. Clément (under the American spelling of his name : Clemens) became bishop for the Americas of the new Universal Gnostic Church (EGU) and , thanks to the exchange of transmissions sub conditione , the succession happened to ... - Jean Baptiste Bricaud said Joanny ( 1881-1934 ) . Intimate Papus, who introduced him to master Philippe (1849-1905) , Bricaud is looking for a church. This is why it comes into contact, in January 1901 with the Gnostic Patriarch Dessessart Fabre ( 1848-1917 ) , successor since 1895 Valentin II , Jules Doinel ( 1842-1902 ), founder of the Gnostic Church first name , which he joined and where he received the nomination for the Episcopal diocese of Lyon- Grenoble, March 3, 1901 . There work alongside Louis Fugairon Sophronius, Bishop Gnostic too.

But aware of the difficulties posed by the questionable validity of the Estate of Bernard Clément - the line of constitutional bishops refers to clerics who took the party to abandon clericalisation for political secularism , often far removed from the true spiritual vocation, he made contact in 1912 with Bishop Louis -François Giraud ( 1876-1950 ) , who was ordained priest July 25, 1912 , and dedicated bishop July 21, 1913 , with the office of coadjutor in Latin Orthodox Church (which became the Gallican Church). It then becomes the owner of the apostolic succession of the Syro- Jacobite Patriarchate of Antioch, dating back to the apostle Peter - founder in the year 38 - by the EVODE line. This apostolic succession absolutely valid, legitimate, then all subsequent lines. And thus universal Gnostic Church, consolidate all the most significant currents in the traditional succession of Antioch. S. G. Joanny Bricaud ( Tau Jean II) , the strength of this incontestable legitimacy amounts to the episcopate, May 5, 1918 , in the Universal Gnostic Church, Monsignor ... - Victor Blanchard (1877-1953), Tau Targelius, born in Versailles, July 10, 1877 . His profane life is that of an officer in the service of the State, he was recording secretary to the Chamber of Deputies, Head of the General Secretariat of the Presidency of the National Assembly and head of the archives. It will also president of the Association of officials. Victor Blanchard was a member of the personality, world he left in 1940 by early retirement, not to serve the Vichy regime. Esoterist very active in both the martinism in masonry, until his death , he devoted , January 7, 1945 , according to the rites of the Roman Catholic Pontifical ... - Roger Ménard, bishop of the Universal Gnostic Church, which is the discrete Tau Eon II. Roger Ménard also founded the very inner Gnostic Church kuldée. He spends 10 June 1946 ... - Robert Ambelain (1907 - 1997), Tau Robert John III , Gnostic Bishop of Samaria. From 1953, Initiation hosts under his episcopal signature studies on " Christian gnosis." On 15 August 1960, he inherits Dupont Bishop of the Patriarchate of universal Gnostic Church that merges with his own community , incorporated in 1954 under the name Gnostic Apostolic Church . In 1956, this church under the auspices of Origen, it recognizes as patron saint. In September 1958, Robert was elected patriarch Ambelain from above synod, under the name of John III and December 20, 1959, Charles Tau confers the pallium patriarchal bequeathed by Bishop Giraud, who had devoted Joanny Bricaud before him. It was also in this year 1959 (May 31) he spends ... - Roger Deschamps, Tau Jean Rudiger in ordine, as bishop of the Gnostic Apostolic Church of Liège. No record exists about him, as, for periods Gnostic Church is very secretive. We know that Tau Jean Rudiger became Primate of Belgium, and Bishop Philip Lawrence Coster

- current Latin Patriarch of old Roman Catholic Church of Flanders - adds in a recent post (8 June 2011) sent to my address primate : "[... ] As for Roger Deschamps, we have no document on the subject. Only the verbal testimony of Armand Toussaint has described the character. Armand Toussaint was a very decent man, he can trust him absolutely. " This is Roger Deschamps dedicated on 1 June 1963 ... - Armand Toussaint (1895-1994) . Raymond Tau Panaghion in ordine, founded in 1964 , the Apostolic Rosicrucian Church gathers soon most of Western apostolic transmissions. After the death of Serge Marcotoune, January 15, 1971, Armand Toussaint founded the Martinist Order of the Knights of Christ, from the double affiliation Russian martinism and knightly descent. The Apostolic Rosicrucian Church grows tremendously, led by Hieronymus Tau (Triantaphyllos Kotzamanis), it will become the Rosicrucian Gnostic Apostolic Church, its current form. Armand Toussaint is probably one of our greatest patriarchs, who devotes 22 July 1989 ... - Pôl Lysis (1958), also known as Tau Phaidros West, copatriarche the Rosicrucian Gnostic Apostolic Church. As being no name, Tau Phaidros not here wants its secular identity is revealed. It transmits, October 27, 2007, the apostolic succession of the Apostle Peter by the patriarchs of Antioch ... - Tau Sendivogius (1961). Bishop Paul Sanda, the current patriarch of the Gnostic Templars johannite and Apostolic Church - Church initiatory very closed, only reserved for inner circles of research, until April 22, 2012 ( inception of the big day ) - resides in Cordes- sur-Ciel, in the historical center of the Church johannite under the patriarchal name S. G. Bernard Raimond II. Thus we see that Bishop Paul Sanda, S. G. Bernard Raymond II , to awake Templar Apostolic church, obscured by Jean Baptiste Bricaud in 1910, uncovering July 21, 2010, is the official successor Apostolic and irrefutably , S. G. Raymond Bernard (Fabré Palaprat). Full circle, S. G. Bernard- Raymond II (Paul Sanda), Apostolic legitimate heir of Raymond Bernard (Fabré Palaprat) , is in fact the legitimate heir of the "Order of the Temple" . Waking the order, it will be the 47th Grand Master , under an affiliation, uninterrupted, since Hugues de Payens . V. D. S. A. ( Currency primitive Christians - Vive Dieu Saint Amour)

Main bibliographic references used for this historical analysis : • The Templar Revelation , Lyn Picknett - Clive Prince, edition of Rock 1999. • Manual of the Knights of the Order of the Temple, published in Paris, at : A. Knight Guyot , printer militia Temple Street Mignon # 2 in 1825 , the year 707 . • Lévitikon, Bernard - Raymond, Primitive Christian bookstore, rue du Roi Doré. Saint Louis, No. 4, 1831. • literal translation of the statutes of the Order ..., 1 April 1813 , published in Paris in 1833 - Printing A.GUYOT . • From the early Christian church and Roman Catholicism today, Paris 1833. • Jerusalem and Rome. (Debates between protecting journalists from Roman Catholicism today and conservative Christianity of the early Church). Paris 1834 • Historical Research Templars and their religious belief, by J. P., ref: in 8 ° Paris Delaunay, 1835. • Wikipedia. • Speech at Paris, in a special meeting of the Knights Templar, 3 thebeth 708 (2 December 1826), by Baron Henin Cuvillers . 8vo. ° Paris, Delaunay. • The Knights Templar 1830, exhibition or religious doctrines, moral and political Primitive Christians or Johannites, ..., considered religious society, political association, and as an order of chivalry, by L. -T Asfeld . 8vo. °, Paris 1830. • Discourse on the civil and religious history of the Templars , delivered Jan. 13, 1833 , by FA Barginet , Grenoble . 8vo . ° Paris Guyot, 1833. • Doctrine of the high temple of initiation, by the Bishop of Nevers, preceptor of the great convent . 8vo. ° Paris Tillard, 1833. • Milita Templi, Departmental Report to Grand Master. 8vo. ° Moessard Paris, 1833. • Milita Templi , Order of the Temple . 8vo. ° Moessard Paris, 1834. • The Knights Templar (1313), by J. Brisset 2 vols. 8vo. ° Dupont Paris, 1837. • Order of the Temple. Manifesto of the large central and primitive convent of the Order. Declarations and Decrees . 4to. ° Moessard Paris, 1837. • Acts of the General convent of the Order of the Temple in Paris in 1836 and 1837. 18mo, Paris Chassaignon, 1837. • Ritual Healing archangels, Grand Grimoire Archbishops, (Editions Trajectory - 2012)

Tau Larménius, 12/11/2013