tod lecture - quteprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/tod_seminar.pdf · transit oriented development (tod):...

9
31/01/2013 1 Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning and Property School of Civil Engineering and the Built Environment Queensland University of Technology A typical transport problem Increase income Increase car ownership Car becomes even more Car restraint Policy intervention? More congestion and delay Reduced demand for buses Reduce bus frequency even more attractive Less mileage per bus Increase bus operating costs Increase fares Subsidies -Pollution -Global warming Bus priority (Ortúzar and Willumsen, 1990) Dimensions of the urban transport problem Land use for transport purposes City Road density (km/km 2 ) Road share of urban area (%) Per capita road area (m 2 ) Chinese megacities About 4 to 6 About 5 to 7 About 6 Tokyo 18.9 14.9 10.9 London 18.1 24.1 28.0 New York 8 16 6 26 3 New York 8 16.6 26.3 Petersen, 2004 Space requirements for various modes Petersen, 2004 Mobility and transport Schafer and Victor, 2000

Upload: dinhthuy

Post on 15-May-2019

231 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

1

Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning

Dr Md KamruzzamanLecturer in Planning and Property

School of Civil Engineering and the Built Environment

Queensland University of Technology

A typical transport problem

Increase income

Increase carownership

Car becomeseven more

Car restraint

Policy intervention?

More congestionand delay

Reduced demandfor buses

Reduce busfrequency

even moreattractive

Less mileageper busIncrease bus

operating costs

Increase fares

Subsidies

-Pollution-Global warming

Bus priority

(Ortúzar and Willumsen, 1990)

Dimensions of the urban transport problem Land use for transport purposes

City Road density (km/km2)

Road share of urban area (%)

Per capita road area (m2)

Chinese megacities About 4 to 6 About 5 to 7 About 6

Tokyo 18.9 14.9 10.9

London 18.1 24.1 28.0

New York 8 16 6 26 3New York 8 16.6 26.3

Petersen, 2004

Space requirements for various modes

Petersen, 2004

Mobility and transport

Schafer and Victor, 2000

Page 2: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

2

What conclusion can be drawn for policy?

• Simple comparisons of average road space between cities do not justify additional road infrastructure investment.

• International experience clearly shows that comprehensive construction programs will not becomprehensive construction programs will not be able to cope with the automobiles’ demand for road.

Introduction

• To discuss strategies to support the realisation of more sustainable urban transport by land use planning.

• What kind of urban development and what land use planning supports sustainable transport?planning supports sustainable transport?

Density vs. annual car use

• Lower urban density increases car dependency.

Kenworthy et al. 1999

Interaction between land use patterns, transport, and the environment

• Trip distance depends on the distribution of facilities

• Shorter distances if: High density

High land use mix

P di hift i l i b d• Paradigm shift in planning based on: Local experience

Global concern

• How can LUP contribute?

Sustainable communities: alternative trends

• Conventional low density development (sprwal)

• Sustainable developmentdevelopment

• Smart growth

• New urbanism

Kamruzzaman, 2012; Berke et al. 2006

TOD: contested concepts

• Traditional neighborhood design

• Neo-traditional neighborhood design

• Mixed-use urban centers

• Transit adjacent development (TAD)

CompactDevelopment

• Pedestrian pockets

• Transit oriented development (TOD)

Compact Development?

No?

Yes? √

Page 3: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

3

TOD vs. Compact City Strategy

• Left: Compact city policy: ‘build in or next to existing city’;

• Right: Transit oriented development: ‘build within walking/ cycling distance of station’

Bertolini et al., 2009

• TOD vs. station area development

What is a TOD and where it should be?

• Key features of a TOD (TRB, 2004):

a moderate to higher-density development;

located within an easy walk of a major transit stop (roughly 5 minutes walk, or 400 to 600 metres)

a mix of residential employment social and shopping a mix of residential, employment, social and shopping opportunities

designed for pedestrians without excluding the auto.

• New construction or redevelopment of one or more buildings whose design and orientation facilitate transit use.

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PS58xuTusJ8&feature=related

Why TOD?

• Main aim: to create settings which prompt people to drive less

and ride public transit more – sustainability.

• Other aims: to build social capital strengthening the bond to build social capital—strengthening the bond

between people and the communities in which they live, work, socialize, and recreate – TOD facilitate human interaction.

• So, it is just not buildings and stations, it is also about community and neighbourhood.

How does TOD facilitate PT usage?

• Basic transport and land use correlations

Bertolini et al., 2009

So, what changes are required?

Bertolini et al., 2009

Why do we need a centre?

Newman (2009)

Page 4: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

4

Why do we need a rapid transit?

• It assists cities in their wealth creation

• It reduces the external costs of car dependence

• It saves time

• It saves space

• It creates city spaces suitable for the knowledge /services• It creates city spaces suitable for the knowledge /services economy

• It creates certainty for investment

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Get the Land Uses Right

• Ensure transit supportive uses

• Discourage non-transit supportive uses

• Encourage a mix of uses

• Locate the uses as close to the LRT station as possible

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Promote Density

• DensityHousing  Jobs

Santa Clara, CA 25 - 45 upa 1.0 FAR Puget Sound, WA 10 - 20 upa 50 jobs/acre Denver, CO 25 - 30 upa 0.75 FAR

• Density concentration and transition

• Plan for density

Queensland Government (2010)

Page 5: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

5

FAR calculation

1000 sqm

500 sqm

FAR = 500/1000 = 0.5

FAR = (500 *4) /1000 = 2

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Create Convenient Pedestrian Connection

• Pedestrian Route Design Considerations: Short Continuous Direct = Convenient

• People are at street level• Separate vehicular and

Direct and visible walkway linkbetween parking and retail space-West Market Square, Calgary

Separate vehicular and pedestrian functions

Clearly marked crosswalks identify space for the pedestrian. West Market Square, Calgary.

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Ensure Good Urban Design

• Create high quality streets

• Make the most of architecture

• Relate the ground level to pedestrian uses

• All season design

• Lighting landscaping and signs• Lighting, landscaping, and signs

Queensland Government, 2010; The City of Calgary, 2004

Architecture and street related uses can make the street interesting. Orenco Station,

Hillsboro, OR

Jamison Square is a notable public space that features a fountain, which simulates a shallow tidal pool – The Pearl District, Portland

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Page 6: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

6

Create Compact Development Patterns

• Compact Street Network

• Cluster buildings

• Leave room to grow

The City of Calgary, 2004

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Manage Parking

• Accommodate the automobile• Parking - enough, but not too

much!• Locate parking to the rear and

sides of buildings• Smaller parking lots• Phased parking from surface

Parking areas can be located behind buildings to keep the street oriented to pedestrians. Orenco station, Hillsboro, OR

p glots to structures

• Bicycle parking

Orenco Station, Portland, Oregon, USA

The City of Calgary, 2004

Key TOD components

• Get the Land Uses Right• Promote Density• Create Convenient Pedestrian Connections• Ensure Good Urban Design• Create Compact Development Patterns• Manage Parking• Manage Parking• Make Each Station a “Place”

Make Each Station a “Place”

• Create a Destination• Make buildings landmarks• Sightlines and views• Orient buildings to the street• Public open spaces

Unique transit stops and buildings act aslandmarks for the station area -Fish Creek/Lacombe, Station Calgary

Public plaza and bus transfer area around Union Station, Los Angeles

The City of Calgary, 2004

Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City, 1902

Page 7: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

7

Copenhagen’s “transit first” finger plan

Cervero. 2009

TOD Singapore: Concept plan

Yang and Lew. 2009

Arlington County, Virginia’s “Bull’s Eye”

Cervero. 2009

Greater Perth Metropolitan Area

Curtis. 2009

Melbourne: possible alternatives to guide development

Rodrigue, 2002; Newton, 1999; Book & Eskilsson, 1996: Petersen, 2004

Brisbane case

Page 8: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

8

Dutch ABC-Planning Key site concept, ABC policy

Land use planning for reduced travel demand

• Basic principles Reduce the rate of

growth of car trips

Supporting public transportations, t a spo tat o s,walking, and cycling

Enhancing healthy condition of living

• Environmental area concept

SEQ vision

Policy framework supporting the vision TOD principles for SEQ

Page 9: TOD Lecture - QUTeprints.qut.edu.au/56798/1/TOD_seminar.pdf · Transit oriented development (TOD): an integrated transport and land use planning Dr Md Kamruzzaman Lecturer in Planning

31/01/2013

9

Brisbane

Kamruzzaman, 2012

Question?

References

• Petersen, R. (2004). Land Use Planning and Urban Transport. GTZ. Eschborn.

• Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R., and Kaiser, D. J. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Fifth Edition. University of Illinois Press: Urbana and Chicago

• Kenworthy, J. Laube, F. et al. (1999) An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities 1960-1990. Updated edition, Boulder.

• McNulty, K. (2002). The Impact of the Mass Use of Motor Cars on Lifestyle and Land Use.

• Newton, P. (1999). Transport, Clean Air and Design Options for Cities of the Future. Building Innovation and Construction Technology. Number 8.

• Schafer, A. Victor, D. (2000). The Future Mobility of the World Population. Transportation Research A. 34 (3): 171-205

• Rodrigue, J-P et al. (2002). Transport Geography on the Web.