to: oft - weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster...

49
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: November 16, 2015 To: Professor Conner, Professor Javadi, Professor Penrod, Professor Reynolds, Professor Riedel From: Mallory Bar, Maggie Bosu, Oliva Kuhn, Dillion Krantz, Sam Smith Subject: Apparel industry Analysis Senior Copeland Associates, As requested, Team 8 was asked to analyze and prepare a report of the apparel industry, then build and analyze the feasibility of opening up Copeland Associates’ own apparel retail store. With extensive research, Copeland Associates discovered opportuniVes for success within the retail apparel industry to open a women’s acVvewear store based on increasing trends within this specific industry. It was chosen to target women ages 1835 years old. Then, the locaVon was determined to be Bloomington, Indiana because of the young populaVon contributed by Indiana University. The women’s acVvewear store is called “SOUL” and is located on North College Avenue in the high traffic downtown area. To determine customer demand, Copeland Associates developed two demand scenarios: Primary data from benchmark compeVtors Secondary data from industry research Based on these demand scenarios it was determined that SOUL will be a feasible project. The report includes an environmental analysis over the apparel industry as a whole, as well as an analysis covering the acVvewear industry, with emphasis on the desired locaVon of Bloomington, Indiana. Within the report is SOUL’s complete business concept, markeVng strategies, and a projected financial analysis for the first 5 years of business. A‘er evaluaVng and weighing the two demand scenarios, SOUL can expect to see an average of 59 potenVal customers each day. If there are any further quesVons about SOUL, please contact Team 8 with the contact informaVon listed below. Sincerely, PPM101 Team 8 Contact – E mail Mallory Bar [email protected] Maggie Bosu [email protected] Dillion Krantz [email protected] Olivia Kuhn [email protected] Sam Smith [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 17-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

LETTER  OF  TRAN

SMITTAL    

Date:  November  16,  2015    To:  Professor  Conner,  Professor  Javadi,  Professor  Penrod,  Professor  Reynolds,  Professor  Riedel    From:  Mallory  Bar,  Maggie  Bosu,  Oliva  Kuhn,  Dillion  Krantz,  Sam  Smith    Subject:  Apparel  industry  Analysis    Senior  Copeland  Associates,    As  requested,  Team  8  was  asked  to  analyze  and  prepare  a  report  of  the  apparel  industry,  then  build  and  analyze  the  feasibility  of  opening  up  Copeland  Associates’  own  apparel  retail  store.  With  extensive  research,  Copeland  Associates  discovered  opportuniVes  for  success  within  the  retail  apparel  industry  to  open  a  women’s  acVvewear  store  based  on  increasing  trends  within  this  specific  industry.  It  was  chosen  to  target  women  ages  18-­‐35  years  old.  Then,  the  locaVon  was  determined  to  be  Bloomington,  Indiana  because  of  the  young  populaVon  contributed  by  Indiana  University.  The  women’s  acVvewear  store  is  called  “SOUL”  and  is  located  on  North  College  Avenue  in  the  high  traffic  downtown  area.    To  determine  customer  demand,  Copeland  Associates  developed  two  demand  scenarios:    •  Primary  data  from  benchmark  compeVtors  •  Secondary  data  from  industry  research  

Based  on  these  demand  scenarios  it  was  determined  that  SOUL  will  be  a  feasible  project.    The  report  includes  an  environmental  analysis  over  the  apparel  industry  as  a  whole,  as  well  as  an  analysis  covering  the  acVvewear  industry,  with  emphasis  on  the  desired  locaVon  of  Bloomington,  Indiana.  Within  the  report  is  SOUL’s  complete  business  concept,  markeVng  strategies,  and  a  projected  financial  analysis  for  the  first  5  years  of  business.  A`er  evaluaVng  and  weighing  the  two  demand  scenarios,  SOUL  can  expect  to  see  an  average  of  59  potenVal  customers  each  day.  If  there  are  any  further  quesVons  about  SOUL,  please  contact  Team  8  with  the  contact  informaVon  listed  below.      Sincerely,    PPM101  Team  8      Contact  –  E  mail  Mallory  Bar                    [email protected]  Maggie  Bosu                [email protected]  Dillion  Krantz              [email protected]  Olivia  Kuhn                    [email protected]  Sam  Smith                      [email protected]  

Page 2: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

COPELAND  ASSOCIATES  @OHIO  UNIVERSITY:  INTEGRATED  BUSINESS  CLUSTER  

PREPARED  FOR:    

PROFESSOR  BRANDT  CONNER  PROFESSOR  SIAMAK  JAVADI  

PROFESSOR  CATHERINE  PENROD  PROFESSOR  TAMMY  REYNOLDS  

PROFESSOR  RALPH  RIEDEL    

PREPARED  BY:    

GROUP  8  –  PPM101  MALLORY  BAR  MAGGIE  BOSU  OLIVIA  KUHN  

DILLON  KRANTZ  SAM  SMITH  

 

Page 3: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

EXECUTIVE  SU

MMARY    

Copeland  Associates  were  first  asked  to  perform  an  in-­‐depth  research  report  of  the  apparel  industry,  leading  up  to  the  development  and  a  feasibility  analysis  of  a  retail  store.  Team  8  of  cohort  PPM101  chose  to  develop  and  open  up  a  women’s  athleVc  retail  store  in  Bloomington,  Indiana  named  SOUL.  Team  8  chose  to  locate  SOUL  in  Bloomington,  Indiana  because  of  minimal  compeVVon  and  high  populaVon  of  young  females,  due  to  the  college  life  of  Indiana  University.  The  report  includes  a  macro  and  micro  industry  analysis,  SOUL’s  business  concept,  two  demand  scenarios,  a  markeVng  strategy,  and  a  financial  analysis  to  determine  SOUL’s  feasibility.      Industry  Analysis  The  apparel  retail  industry  is  molded  to  the  needs  of  consumers  and  the  average  amount  of  disposable  income  they  have.  From  2014  through  2015,  the  apparel  industry  market  grew  at  a  rate  of  14.2%  and  is  expected  to  be  valued  at  $500  billion  in  2018.  The  acVvewear  industry  is  also  experiencing  a  posiVve  trend,  as  a  result  of  sales  in  acVvewear  topping  sales  of  the  apparel  industry  as  a  whole.  SOUL,  located  in  Bloomington  will  be  a  successful  project  because  of  low  levels  of  compeVVon  in  the  market.      Business  Concept  Copeland  Associates  recommend  a  women’s  acVvewear  store  for  Bloomington  based  on  the    external  analysis  and  the  demographics  of  the  region.  The  market  share  of  acVvewear  in  the  industry  is  16%  and  projected  to  grow  in  coming  years.  SOUL  is  focused  on  providing  young  women  with  quality  premium  acVvewear  so  they  are  feeling  comfortable  and  confident.  SOUL  will  partner  with  top  brands  such  as  Nike,  Adidas,  Under  Armour,  and  LuluLemon  to  ensure  quality  and  saVsfacVon  of  consumers’  needs.        Demands  In  order  to  reach  a  projected  number  of  daily  customers,  Copeland  Associates  analyzed  the  industry  trends  and  demographics  of  Bloomington,  Indiana.  During  this  process  two  demand  scenarios  were  formed.  Demand  scenario  one  is  comprised  of  primary  data  received  from  SOUL’s  benchmark  compeVtors.  The  second  demand  scenario  was  formed  using  secondary  data  from  the  environmental  research  of  the  industry.  The  two  demand  scenarios  were  weighed  and  it  was  concluded  that  SOUL’s  average  daily  customers  would  be  59.    MarkePng  Campaign  Copeland  Associates  have  designed  a  markeVng  campaign  that  will  effecVvely  appeal  to  the  target  market.  SOUL  will  be  adverVsed  on  social  media  accounts  including  Facebook  and  Instagram.  SOUL  will  also  have  its  own  website  for  customers  to  browse  online  for  merchandise  and  submit  comments,  concerns,  or  suggesVons.  Copeland  Associates  chose  to  promote  SOUL  using  an  internet  radio  site,  Pandora  Radio,  to  anract  customers  from  a  specific  region  and  target  market.  The  last  promoVon  strategy  used  was  a  10%  off  coupon  for  the  customers’  first  purchase.  SOUL  will  uVlize  these  markeVng  strategies  to  draw  more  customers  into  the  store  each  day.    Financials    The  financial  analysis  within  the  report  includes  summaries  of  the  Statement  of  Financial  PosiVon,  Statements  of  OperaVon,  Capital  BudgeVng  Analysis,  and  Weighted  Average  Cost  of  Capitol.  The  project  was  determined  to  be  feasible  based  on  the  calculaVons  of  net  present  value,  internal  rate  of  return,  and  payback  period.  In  year  2,  SOUL  will  generate  $43,692,  which  is  the  first  year  with  a  posiVve  net  income.      Conclusion    In  the  future,  SOUL  plans  to  create  and  manufacture  their  own  products.  Based  on  the  industry    examinaVon,  business  concept,  business  strategies,  demands,  and  financials,  Copeland  Associates    will  proceed  to  open  the  acVvewear  retailer,  SOUL.  

Page 4: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Table  of  Contents  

IntroducPon……………………………………………………………………………………………….  Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  SOUL………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….    Macro  Environment  Analysis………………………………………………………………………  Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  OpportuniVes/Threats……………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Trends……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….    Micro  Environment  Analysis……………………………………………………………………….  Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Demographics……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Market  Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  CompeVtors………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………    Business  Concept……………………………………………………………………………………….  Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Business  Model………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Brand…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  LocaVon…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Target  Market……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Consumer  Profiles……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..  Wholesalers……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Inventory…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..  Employees…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………    Demand  Scenari1…………………………………………………………………………………….  Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Development…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….    Demand  Scenario  2…………………………………………………………………………………….  Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………    Demand  Forecast  Matrix……………………………………………………………………………  Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………    MarkePng  Campaign  Product  Price  Place  PromoVon………………………………………………………………………………………….  Atmosphere  and  Design…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Social  Media………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Facebook…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..  

1  1  1    2  2  2  2    3  3  3  4  4    5  5  5  5  6  6  7  7  8  8    9  9  9    10  10    11  11    12  12  13  13  13  

Page 5: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Instagram………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Website……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..  Coupon………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Pandora  Radio……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………    MIS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  ShopKeep………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Sales  Management…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Employee  Management…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Customer  Management…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Inventory  Management…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Product  Management……………………………………………………………………………………………………….    Financial  Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………….  Statement  of  Financial  PosiVon…………………………………………………………………………………………  Statement  of  OperaVons……………………………………………………………………………………………………  Capital  Budget  Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………..  Feasibility…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..    Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………….    Appendix  A.1:  Statement  of  Financial  PosiVon…………………………………………………………………..  Appendix  A.2:  Statement  of  OperaVons…………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  A.3:  Capital  Budget  Analysis……………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  A.4:  Quarterly  Cash  Flows………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  B:  Inventory……………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  C:  SWOT  Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  D.1:  Business  Model  Canvas………………………………………………………………………………  Appendix  D.2:  Business  Model  Canvas………………………………………………………………………………  Appendix  E:  MIS  Dashboard………………………………………………………………………………………………  Appendix  F.1:  Macro  Environment…………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  F.2:  Macro  Environment…………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  F.3:  Macro  Environment…………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  G:  CompeVtors…………………………………………………………………………………………………..  Appendix  H:  Products  Offered  …………………………………………………………………………………………..  Appendix  I.1:  Interior  Layout  …………………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  I.2:  Interior  Layout  …………………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  J:    Facebook……………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Appendix  K:  Instagram………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Appendix  L:  Website………………………………………………………………………………………………………….  References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………  References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………        

Table  of  Contents  

14  14  15  15    16  16  16  16  16  17  17    18  18  18  19  19    20    22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  

Page 6: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

List  of  Figures  

Figure  1.1……………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  1.2……………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  1.3……………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  2………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  3………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  4………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  5………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  6………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  7………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  8………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  9………………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  10…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Figure  11…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Figure  12.1…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  12.2…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  13…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Figure  14.1…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  14.2…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  15.1…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  15.2…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  16…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Figure  17…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  Figure  18.1…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  18.2…………………………………………………………………………………………………  Figure  19…………………………………………………………………………………………………….  

1  1  1  2  3  4  5  6  8  9  10  11  12  13  13  14  15  15  16  16  17  18  19  19  20    

Page 7: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

It  was  decided  the  best  possible  opportunity  within  the  retail  apparel  industry  was  in  the  women’s  acVvewear  segment  of  the  market,  which  is  growing  at  a  rate  faster  than  any  other  segments  in  the  industry  (Fashionista,  2015).  The  locaVon  chosen  for  the  store  is  in  Bloomington,  Indiana.  The  target  market  consists  of  female  college  students  and  women  in  the  community  ages  18-­‐35  as  primary  consumers.  This  locaVon  allows  us  to  enter  a  fitness  apparel  market  that  has  yet  to  be  saturated  by  compeVtors,  while  markeVng  to  a  populaVon  that  is  becoming  increasingly  more  acVve.  In  order  to  conclude  if  this  project  is  feasible,  Copeland  Associates  must  derive  two  demand  scenarios  for  the  company  that  would  help  accurately  hypothesize  the  financial  numbers  of  the  retail  business.    

Copeland  Associates  has  shown  interest  in  running  a  startup  business  in  the  industry  of  retail  apparel.  This  report  will  give  a  clear  and  concise  analysis  of  the  current  retail  apparel  industry  market  and  what  behavior  is  expected  of  that  industry  in  future  years.  A`er  undergoing  in  depth  research,  

Overview    

SOUL’s  Mission  Statement    

“Crea&ng  a  lifestyle  that  inspires  women  to  reach  their  full  poten&al  by  ac&vely  pursuing  happiness  and  serenity  within.”  

IntroducPon  INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

1  

Figure  1.1  

Figure  1.3  (DapperQ,  2013)  

Figure  1.2  

Page 8: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Overview  

The  retail  apparel  industry  revolves  strictly  around  the  buyer.  Consumer  trends  help  to  mold  the  types  of  apparel  retailers  are  buying  and  reselling.  Baseline  data  for  consumers  begins  with  the  average  household  income  of  consumers  and  how  much  of  that  income  is  considered  disposable.  This  number  can  help  tell  retailers  how  to  price  their  specialty  products.  In  2014,  the  retail  apparel  industry  reached  sales  of  $22  trillion,  and  is  expected  to  keep  growing.  The  US  is  one  of  the  global  leaders  in  retail  apparel  sales,  only  behind  China.  By  2018,  the  US  retail  apparel  market  is  expected  to  be  valued  at  around  $500  billion.    The  market  conVnued  growing  at  a  rate  of  14.2%  from  2014  to  2015,  showing  that  consumers  are  beginning  to  spend  again  a`er  the  recession  in  2009  (eCommerce).  With  this  drasVc  growth  the  industry  is  currently  experiencing,  it  creates  a  great  opportunity  for  new  businesses  to  enter  the  market.      

Trends  OpportuniPes  &  Threats  

Macro-­‐Environment  Analysis    

The  athleVc  apparel  industry  has  been  growing  at  excepVonal  rates  in  recent  years  and  is  showing  no  signs  of  slowing.  This  growth  can  be  anributed  to  several  different  factors  including  the  growing  number  of  individuals  exercising,  new  “athleisure”  fashion  trends,  and  advances  in  technology  that  have  made  new,  innovaVve  fabric  materials  available  to  manufacturers.    More  women  are  using  acVvewear  as  a  fashion  statement,  and  less  as  strictly  gym  atre.  The  global  sports  apparel  market,  driven  by  women’s  acVvewear,  is  expected  to  grow  to  $178  billion  by  2019  (figure  3).  In  2013,  women’s  acVvewear  sales  reached  $11.5  billion  in  the  US,  a  9%  increase  from  2012,  while  acVvewear  as  a  whole  accounted  for  16%  of  the  total  apparel  market  (Sherman,  2014).    

Since  the  retail  apparel  industry  has  been  growing  at  such  rapid  rates,  small  startup  businesses  have  conVnued  to  anempt  joining  the  market.  The  ease  at  which  these  businesses  are  entering  the  industry  has  given  the  industry  a  relaVvely  high  threat  of  new  entry.  However,  compeVVon  remains  high.  Thus  far,  nothing  suggests  that  the  retail  apparel  industry  is  fighVng  for  business  with  other  industries.  Consumers  will  always  need  clothing,  and  stores  will  always  exist.  Retail  apparel  stores  have  to  compete  with  online  shopping  and  the  costly  expenditure  that  running  a  retail  apparel  store  can  be.  Buying  large  amounts  of  inventory  from  wholesalers  can  prove  to  be  costly  if  not  managed  correctly  (Wagner).    

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

135  

140  

145  

150  

155  

160  

165  

170  

175  

180  

185  

2015   2016   2017   2018   2019  

Market  V

alue

 (USD

B)  

Year  Figure  2  (StaVsta,  2015)  

Project  Development  of  Global    Sports  Apparel  Market  (USDB)  

2  

Page 9: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Micro-­‐Environment  Analysis    INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

Overview  

The  specific  market  focused  on  is  women’s  athleVc  wear.  The  athleVc  apparel  industry  has  been  growing  at  rapid  rates.  In  2013,  women’s  acVvewear  sales  reached  $11.5  billion  in  the  US  alone,  a  9%  increase  from  2012,  while  acVvewear  as  a  whole  accounted  for  16%  of  the  total  apparel  market  (Sherman,  2014).  The  U.S  is  the  largest  acVvewear  consumer  in  the  world.  The  U.S.  sales  in  2014  increased  by  8%  compared  with  the  second  largest  consumer,  China’s  5%  increase  in  sales.  Retailers  are  entering  the  industry  due  to  athleVcwear  becoming  the  new  casual  fashion  trend  and  the  posiVve  expenditure  growth  rates.  These  new  entrants  include  specialized  acVvewear  stores  and  department  stores.  

Demographics    

In  order  for  specialty  apparel  stores  to  be  successful  in  any  market,  it’s  important  for  the  store  to  have  a  specific  target  market  focused  on  the  areas  demographics.  Overall,  athleVcwear  has  experienced  a  posiVve  current  value  growth  of  3%  since  2010  (figure  3).  The  posiVvity  of  the  market  has  inspired  retailers  to  enter  the  athleVcwear  market  at  a  casual  end  (Passport,  2015).  With  acVvewear  rapidly  becoming  the  new  casual  fashion  apparel  trend  in  the  U.S.,  specialized  athleVcwear  companies  are  focusing  on  the  trend.  Figure  4  below  shows  how  U.S.  women’s  acVvewear  purchases  are  on  an  upward  trend  and  increasing  about  2  million  each  year.  Indiana’s  household  income  average  is  lower  than  the  U.S.’s  household  average.  Bloomington,  Indiana’s  average  is  $56,264  and  the  U.S.’s  average  is  $84,337  (SimplyMap,  2015).  While  income  is  lower  customers  will  value  quality  over  the  price  of  SOUL’s  premium  products.  By  SOUL  favoring  quality  over  inexpensive  prices  it  will  increase  the  store’s  reputaVon  and  product  loyalty,  keeping  the  store  sustainable  in  the  future  (BusinessDicVonary,  2015).      

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014  

Millions  

Expenditure  Growth  of  Women’s  AcPvewear  in  the  U.S.  (2008-­‐2014)  

3  

Figure  3  (SimplyMap,  2015)  

Page 10: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Market  Analysis    

The  current  state  of  the  acVvewear  industry  is  being  transformed  as  more  young  consumers  accept  acVvewear  as  everyday  street  wear.  Frequent  consumers  of  the  specialized  industry  are  between  the  ages  of  18-­‐35.  These  consumers  prefer  acVvewear  apparel  that  is  versaVle,  comfortable,  durable,  and  stylish.  Copeland  Associates’  mission  is  to  market  affordable  and  stylish  name  brand  acVvewear  to  young  female  consumers.  In  order  to  locate  a  successful  region  to  target  the  female  populaVon  of  18-­‐35  years  old,  Copeland  Associates  researched  a  locaVon  with  a  college  town  and  large  female  populaVon.  This  is  why  it  was  chosen  to  locate  in  Bloomington,  Indiana,  where  Indiana  University  enrolls  40,000+  students.  Young  adults  contribute  not  only  the  most  to  the  apparel  industry  as  a  whole,  but  specifically  to  the  acVvewear  industry.  The  female  populaVon  of  Bloomington  makes  up  approximately  half  of  the  overall  83,458  populaVon.  In  2014,  40%  of  apparel  was  purchased  by  these  women  (SimplyMap,  2014).            

CompePtors    

A  growing  business  challenge  for  specialized  sportswear  companies  is  compeVVon  from  mass  merchants.  Large  discounters  such  as  Wal-­‐Mart  with  big  sports  departments  have  rapidly  expanded  in  recent  years.  Wal-­‐Mart  carries  a  more  limited  selecVon  of  acVvewear,  but  they  are  sVll  considered  the  largest  retailer  of  sporVng  goods.  Mass  merchant  compeVVon  can  cause  specialized  sportswear  companies  to  reduce  prices  and  increase  spending  on  adverVsing  (Passport,  2015).  In  order  for  specialty  acVvewear  stores  to  be  successful  in  the  apparel  industry  targeVng  a  niche  market  is  crucial.  Specialty  stores  try  to  differenVate  themselves  from  larger  department  stores  by  hiring  knowledgeable  staff  and  connecVng  to  the  community  through  sponsoring  local  events  (Hoovers,  2015).  The  threat  of  new  entry  for  acVvewear  apparel  within  Bloomington,  Indiana  is  low  given  the  low  level  of  compeVVon  in  the  surrounding  area.  The  toughest  level  of  compeVVon  that  SOUL  would  have  to  compete  with  is  external  compeVtors.  With  many  department  stores  in  the  area  SOUL  is  compeVng  against  Target,  Macy’s,  Dunham’s,  Dick’s,  MC  Sports,  and  Wal-­‐Mart.  All  of  these  retailers  are  mass  merchandisers  that  sell  mulVple  other  goods  and  products  asides  from  women’s  acVvewear,  which  SOUL  will  be  specializing  in.  SOUL  also  has  local  specialized  compeVtors  including  Seaview  and  Indiana  Running  Company.  Seaview  acquires  a  more  premium  inventory  including  brands  such  as  Patagonia,  Ray  Bans,  Oakley.  Their  focus  is  to  target  outdoor  adventure  enthusiasts.  Indiana  Running  Company  on  the  other  hand  does  not  focus  on  the  athleisure  trend,  they  target  experienced  athletes  (refer  to  figure  4  for  compeVtor  analysis).  In  order  for  Copeland  Associates  to  differenVate  from  compeVtors,  SOUL  entered  into  a  niche  market  not  yet  introduced  in  Bloomington,  Indiana.    

Micro-­‐Environment  Analysis    INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

4  

Figure  4  

Refer  to  Appendix  G  for  compe&tor  informa&on    

Page 11: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Overview  

Copeland  Associates’  business  concept  is  a  women’s  acVve  wear  store  located  in  Bloomington,  Indiana.  Indiana  ranks  near  the  middle  of  the  most  acVve  states,  which  allows  to  enter  a  market  with  few  compeVtors  (StaVsta,  2015).  With  four  yoga  studios  located  in  a  one-­‐mile  radius  from  the  store  locaVon,  and  very  few  direct  compeVtors,  SOUL  will  have  potenVal  to  dominate  the  market.  The  leading  product  will  be  yoga  pants  but  the  store  will  also  carry  tops,  shorts  and  sweaters.  SOUL  will  offer  high  quality  brands  such  as  Nike,  Lululemon,  Under  Armour  and  Adidas.  SOUL’s  target  market  includes  women  ages  18-­‐35  which  pairs  well  with  Bloomington’s  large  female  populaVon.  SOUL  is  located  in  the  Gateway  Plaza  (figure  5)  where  there  will  be  a  significant  amount  of  foot  traffic  due  to  the  plaza  containing  three  other  retail  stores  and  two  floors  of  apartments.    

Business  Model  

SOUL  will  carry  premium  name  brands  that  are  associated  with  quality.  This  will  require  Copeland  Associates  to  develop  relaVonships  with  apparel  wholesalers.  Since  SOUL  is  located  in  a  college  town,  it  is  important  to  take  advantage  of  busy  seasons  like  spring  and  fall,  and  adjust  accordingly  for  the  summer  when  most  of  the  students  return  to  their  hometown.    SOUL  will  provide  value  by  being  the  only  store  in  the  area  that  specializes  in  women’s  acVvewear.  Excellent  customer  service  will  be  a  driving  factor  for  SOUL.  Employees  with  communicaVve  skills  will  allow  customers  to  feel  comfortable  in  the  store  and  make  them  excited  to  return  to  SOUL.    

Brand  

SOUL’S  vision  is  to  supply  women  with  high  quality  and  luxury  acVve  wear  that  can  be  fashionable  in  the  gym  or  in  public.  In  the  future,  SOUL  has  goals  to  manufacture  their  own  products.  The  current  mission  of  SOUL  is  to  create  a  lifestyle  that  inspires  women  to  reach  their  full  potenVal  by  acVvely  pursuing  happiness  and  serenity  within  themselves.      

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

Business  Concept  

Gateway  Retail  Plaza  

Figure  5  (Gateway,  2015)  

5  

Page 12: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

LocaPon  

The  locaVon  of  SOUL  is  crucial  to  the  success  of  the  business.  With  Indiana  University  Memorial  Stadium  and  four  local  yoga  studios  within  walking  distance,  customers  will  have  easy  access  to  SOUL.  1280  N  College  is  a  prime  locaVon  for  the  store  because  of  its  proximity  to  campus  and  the  high  amount  of  daily  traffic  that  passes  the  store  front.  With  18,717  cars  driving  by  everyday,  SOUL  will  be  recognized  by  a  wide  variety  of  potenVal  customers  (Gateway,  2015).  The  building  finished  construcVon  in  2015,  which  will  give  SOUL  the  modern  look  it  is  striving  for.  The  space  is  1,330  square  feet  and  will  be  leased  for  five  years.  This  space  gives  SOUL  the  ability  to  provide  the  perfect  amount  of  inventory  to  customers  and  make  the  women  feel  like  they  are  shopping  in  a  comfortable  environment.  Around  the  area  of  Bloomington  are  4  different  yoga  studios  (figure  6).  These  studios  are  within  a  ten  minute  commute  to  SOUL  which  is  perfect  for  the  store’s  locaVon.  Lastly,  the  storefront  overlooks  Miller-­‐Showers  Park  which  is  a  beauVful  view.  While  people  leisure  their  way  around  the  park,  SOUL  will  be  in  sight  for  the  community  of  Bloomington  as  well.  

Target  Market  

SOUL’s  business  model  is  based  upon  selling  high-­‐quality  and  luxurious  acVvewear  to  women.  SOUL  will  market  to  women  ages  18  to  35.  These  women  will  consist  of  students  from  Indiana  University's  campus  and  young  women  within  the  Bloomington  community.  The  school  populaVon  consists  of  46,416  students,  51%  of  these  students  being  women  and  the  community  of  Bloomington  consist  of  23,810  woman  ages  18-­‐34  (SimplyMap,  2015).  SOUL  will  seek  to  target  these  young  women  and  capture  a  porVon  of  their  purchases.  These  women  will  be  anracted  to  the  store  due  to  the  modern  environment  and  premium  brands  sold.  With  trends  showing  acVvewear  being  worn  for  everyday  purposes  and  casual  wear,  women  will  want  to  buy  from  SOUL.  Copeland  Associates  believe  this  is  a  likely  statement  because  there  is  no  other  store  in  the  area  who  specialize  in  women’s  acVvewear,  which  provides  a  unique  opportunity  for  this  target  market.  

SOUL,  1280  N  College,  Bloomington  Indiana    

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

Business  Concept  

Figure  6  6  

:Yoga  Studio  

Page 13: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

7  

Business  Concept  

SOUL  will  be  selling  products  from  Nike,  Under  Armour,  Lululemon,  and  Adidas.  The  process  of  applying  to  become  authorized  users  of  these  products  will  take  place  a  year  in  advance  prior  to  SOUL’s  grand  opening.  On  average,  a`er  applying  to  become  a  Nike  retailer  it  takes  up  to  60  days  for  the  applicaVon  to  be  reviewed  and  processed  (Nike,  2015).  Both  Addidas  and  Under  Armour  have  similar  applicaVon  processes.  Lululemon’s  review  process  is  more  extensive  because  they  wholesale  to  a  limited  amount  of  partners.  They  are  looking  for  partners  who  share  their  values;  a  passion  for  elevaVng  the  level  of  health  in  the  community  and  being  a  stand  for  greatness  in  the  world.  SOUL’s  mission  is  creaVng  a  lifestyle  that  inspires  women  to  reach  their  full  potenVal  by  acVvely  pursuing  happiness  and  serenity  within.  SOUL’s  goal  is  to  establish  business  in  Bloomington  first  and  then  reach  out  to  the  yoga  studios  located  near  SOUL  to  create  partnerships.  Combined  with  this  future  goal  and  SOUL’s  atmosphere,  it  leaves  SOUL  as  the  perfect  candidate  for  a  partnership  with  Lululemon.        

 Wholesalers    

Riley  is  a  20  year  old  female  who  anends  the  Big  10  college  Indiana  University,  located  in  Bloomington,  Indiana.  Riley  works  at  her  campus  rec  center  making  $4,524  a  year  (minimum  wage).  She  is  a  very  up-­‐beat  and  posiVve  person  who  loves  to  stay  acVve.  She  is  in  the  yoga  club  at  her  school  and  works  out  four  Vmes  a  week.  Riley’s  style  is  important  to  her,  as  she  wants  to  be  comfortable  and  trendy.  Her  everyday  style  consists  of  yoga  pants,  running  shoes,  t-­‐shirt,  and  a  hoodie.  On  the  week  days  her  goal  is  to  have  comfortable  atre,  while  balancing  her  classes  and  acVve  lifestyle.    During  the  Fall  and  Spring  semester  at  school,  Riley  usually  hangs  outside  with  her  friends  or  at  the  local  yoga  studio  in  Bloomington.  At  these  hangout  sites  she  listens  to  music  and  enjoys  the  outdoors.  She  is  always  keeping  up  with  the  latest  trends  and  news  on  social  media.  Her  favorite  sites  are  Instagram  and  Facebook  where  she  can  find  and  connect  with  everyone.  While  Riley  is  walking  to  work  at  the  rec  center,  she  comes  across  a  table  on  campus  handing  out  promoVon  cards  for  a  new  acVvewear  store,  SOUL,  five  minutes  off  campus.  She  takes  the  card  and  immediately  looks  them  up  on  Instagram.  There,  she  is  able  to  see  the  inside  look  of  the  store  and  some  of  the  clothing  and  accessories  they  sell.  Riley  falls  in  love  with  SOUL.  She  can’t  wait  to  go  to  the  grand  opening  and  shop  for  some  new  yoga  clothes!    

Brynn  is  a  32  year  old  female  who  lives  in  the  downtown  city  of  Bloomington,  Indiana.  She  has  been  working  for  a  company  making  approximently  $50,000  a  year  and  also  sings  in  a  band  with  her  friends  on  the  weekends.  Brynn  is  a  friendly  person  who  is  very  acVve  within  her  community.  In  her  free  Vme  she  enjoys  listening  to  the  radio  staVon  Pandora  Music,  anending  yoga  classes  three  days  a  week,  and  spending  her  money  shopping  for  the  latest  trends.  Brynn  chooses  to  stay  comfortable  with  her  style  by  pairing  her  favorite  Lululemon  yoga  pants  with  a  comfortable  hoodie.    While  driving  to  her  yoga  class  and  listening  to  Pandora  Radio,  Brynn  hears  a  commercial  about  a  new  retail  store  opening  minutes  away  from  her  yoga  studio.  She  drives  passed  the  locaVon  of  SOUL  everyday  on  her  way  to  work  and  is  excited  to  check  it  out  during  the  grand  opening!    Brynn  loves  the  “athleisure  wear”  trend  and  is  interested  to  shop  the  premium  brands  offered.  Brynn  has  reviewed  the  acVvewear  store  on  their  website  and  immediately  falls  in  love  with  the  accessories  and  clothing.  She  is  excited  to  let  all  her  co-­‐workers  and  friends  in  the  community  know  about  SOUL’s  grand  opening.  

Consumer  Profile  A   Consumer  Profile  B  

Page 14: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

Inventory  

In  order  to  acquire  inventory  for  SOUL,  Copeland  Associates  will  have  to  contact  the  name  brand  wholesaler  to  find  out  the  minimum  price  or  quanVty  required  for  a  wholesale  purchase.    Specifically,  SOUL  will  carry  Nike,  Adidas,  Under  Armour,  and  Lululemon  (refer  to  Appendix  B  for  a  detailed  inventory  list).  To  avoid  purchasing  knock  off  brands,  Copeland  Associates  plan  to  only  purchase  from  authorized  suppliers.  The  inventory  management  system  that  Copeland  Associates  recommends  using  is  the  point  of  sale  cash  register.  The  POS  tablet  system  will  help  the  business  operate  more  efficiently  by  using  a  cloud  based  plazorm.  This  system  allows  easy  access  to  past  transacVons  and  payment  acVvity.    The  system  comes  in  a  package  that  includes  the  iPad  POS  tablet,  cash  drawer,  receipt  printer  and  credit  card  reader  (POS  Tablet).    

Employees  

SOUL  plans  to  hire  7  employees  to  effecVvely  run  the  store.  Each  day,  two  employees  will  be  working,  one  assisVng  customers  and  one  as  a  cashier.  Along  with  these  part  Vme  employees,  a  full  Vme  manager  will  be  working  everyday.  The  part  Vme  employees  will  work  29  hours  a  week  and  be  paid  $10  per  hour.  This  wage  was  decided  a`er  reviewing  the  Indiana  minimum  wage  law  and  the  retail  apparel  industry  averages.  The  middle  ground  is  $10,  which  is  between  the  state  minimum  wage  of  $7.25  and  the  industry  hourly  wage  average  of  $12.32  (US  Department  of  Labor,  2015).  The  managers  will  work  40  hours  a  week  and  be  paid  $15  per  hour.  This  falls  between  the  retail  floor  workers’  and  cashiers’  $10  wage  and  the  manager  industry  hourly  wage  average  of  $20.17  (US  Department  of  Labor,  2015).  Cashiers  are  paid  above  minimum  wage  in  order  to  give  them  incenVve  to  provide  quality  customer  service.  Managers  earn  a  higher  wage  because  they  have  more  responsibiliVes  such  as  opening  and  closing  the  store,  managing  inventory,  and  keeping  the  store  organized  (figure  7).  In  the  future,  SOUL  plans  to  expand  to  more  cashiers  and  sales  assistants  working  at  the  same  Vme.    

Business  Concept  

Figure  7  

8  

    Hours/Week   Pay/Hour   Pay/Week   Weeks/Year   Pay   %  Benefits  given   Total  Employee  Cost  

Part  Time  Employees                              

Cashier  1   29    $10.00      $290.00     52    $15,080.00     -­‐    $15,080.00    

Cashier  2   29    $10.00      $290.00     52    $15,080.00     -­‐    $15,080.00    

Floor  Worker  1     20    $10.00      $200.00     52    $10,400.00     -­‐    $10,400.00    

Floor  Worker  2   20    $10.00      $200.00     52    $10,400.00     -­‐    $10,400.00    

Floor  Worker  3   20    $10.00      $200.00     52    $10,400.00     -­‐    $10,400.00    

                               

Full  Time  Employees                              

Manager  1   40    $15.00      $600.00     52    $31,200.00     20%    $37,440.00    

Manager  2   40    $15.00      $600.00     52    $31,200.00     20%    $37,440.00    

                               

                             $136,240.00    

Page 15: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

Overview  

To  calculate  the  first  demand  scenario,  Copeland  Associates  benchmarked  three  companies  to  help  generate  an  esVmate  of  how  many  customers  SOUL  will  have  on  a  daily  basis.  These  companies  included  Athleta,  Seaview,  and  Lululemon.  These  benchmarks  were  helpful  when  determining  esVmates  because  of  their  similar  product  lines  and  demographics.  Copeland  Associates  weighed  each  compeVtor  based  on  female  populaVon,  store  square  footage,  and  average  daily  customers  to  calculate  the  projected  number  of  customers  that  will  walk  into  SOUL  daily.  (See  Figure  8)  

Development  

Copeland  Associates  used  a  series  of  calculaVons  in  order  to  determine  the  expected  amount  of  daily  customers.  This  process  began  with  extensive  primary  research  of  the  benchmark  companies  through  phone  interviews  with  store  employees.  From  there,  Copeland  Associates  retrieved  the  female  populaVon  of  each  benchmark’s  city  and  the  square  footage  of  each  benchmark’s  store.  A  more  accurate  comparison  could  be  drawn  a`er  calculaVng  the  square  footage  of  the  benchmark  locaVons  relaVve  to  the  store  size  of  SOUL.  A`er  dividing  the  square  footage  of  each  store  by  the  daily  customers,  Copeland  Associates  had  an  accurate  number  to  mulVply  SOUL’s  store  square  footage.  By  mulVplying  that  number  by  SOUL’s  store  square  footage,  it  was  calculated  that  SOUL  would  receive,  on  average,  70  customers  per  day.  Seaview  was  given  the  highest  weight  because  they  are  located  in  the  same  market  as  SOUL.  They  receive  the  majority  of  their  business  from  the  students  of  Indiana  University  and  the  locals  of  Bloomington,  which  is  similar  to  SOUL’s  target  market.  Athleta  received  the  second  highest  weight  because  of  their  product  line  and  locaVon.  Athleta  specializes  in  women’s  acVvewear,  the  same  product  line  as  SOUL.  Athleta  is  also  located  in  the  college  town  of  Madison,  Wisconsin.  Lastly,  Lululemon  was  given  the  lowest  weight  because  they  do  not  meet  the  same  requirements  as  SOUL.    

Figure  8  

9  

    Madison,  WI   Bloomington,  IN   Indianapolis,  IN  

CompeVtor  Store   Athleta   Seaview   Lululemon  

Female  PopulaVon   124,936   41,375   403,560  

Square  Footage  of  Store   3,850   1,500   2,800  

Daily  Customers   350   25   200  Daily  Customers/Square  Foot   .0909   .0167   .0714  

 Weight   30%   45%   25%  

Weighted  Customers/Square  Foot/  Day   .027   .007515   .01785  

(.052365)  Weighted  Customers/  Square  Foot/  Day    

x   1,330  Square  Feet   =  

70  Customers/  Day  

Demand  Scenario  1:  Primary  Data    

Page 16: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Demand  Scenario  2:  Secondary  Data    INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

Female  PopulaVon  in  Bloomington  

%  of  Women  who    Purchase  AcVvewear  

Market  Share  of  AcVvewear  

Avg.  #  Days  Women  Shop/  Year    

#  of  CompeVtors  

#  Days  of    OperaVon  

41,375  

30  x  

x   16%  

20.65%  x  

3.5  

355  

÷  

÷  

Avg.  Customers/  Day   33  

Overview  

To  determine  the  amount  of  potenVal  customers  each  day,  Copeland  Associates  started  by  researching  the  total  female  populaVon  of  Bloomington.  This  number  is  41,375  and  includes  the  female  populaVon  enrolled  at  Indiana  University  (SimplyMap,  2015).  Next,  the  average  number  of  days  that  women  make  a  trip  to  an  apparel  store  every  year  was  taken  into  account.  This  number  is  30  days  and  was  mulVplied  by  the  female  populaVon  to  get  how  many  days  women  will  go  to  an  apparel  store  every  year,  which  is  1,241,250.  The  market  share  of  acVvewear  and  the  percent  of  women  who  purchase  acVvewear  was  mulVplied  by  how  many  days  women  will  go  to  an  apparel  store  every  year.  Based  on  this,  41,010.9  women  purchase  acVvewear  per  year.  Copeland  Associates  divided  this  number  by  3.5,  which  was  the  amount  of  compeVtors  in  the  area.  Indirect  compeVtors  were  counted  as  .5  of  a  compeVtor.  Lastly,  the  days  of  operaVon  per  year  was  divided  by  the  compeVtors  to  find  the  average  amount  of  customers  that  will  be  in  SOUL  everyday.  Copeland  Associates  calculated  each  day  approximately  33  customers  will  be  in  the  store.  (See  figure  9)  

Figure  9  

10  

Page 17: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Demand  Forecast  Matrix    

Overview  

Based  on  the  first  and  second  demand  scenarios,  Copeland  Associates  weighed  each  scenario  to  find  the  esVmated  average  amount  of  customers  that  will  enter  SOUL  daily.  Based  on  the  use  of  benchmark  companies  who  had  similar  business  concepts  and  demographics  as  SOUL,  Copeland  Associates  weighed  the  first  demand  scenario  at  70%.  This  informaVon  is  the  most  relevant  to  find  how  many  customers  will  actually  be  in  SOUL  on  a  daily  basis.  The  second  demand  scenario,  which  is  based  off  of  secondary  data  was  given  the  weight  of  30%.  A`er  weighing  each  demand  scenario,  Copeland  Associates  found  59  customers  are  expected  to  come  into  SOUL  each  day.  The  average  Vcket  price  and  the  conversion  rate  were  determined  based  on  the  benchmark  companies  informaVon  from  demand  scenario  one.  The  daily  amount  of  sales  is  determined  by  mulVplying  daily  customers  Vmes  the  conversion  rate  Vmes  the  average  Vcket  price.  (See  figure  10)  

Customers   Weight   Weighted  Customers  

Demand  Scenario  1   70   70%   49  

Demand  Scenario  2   33   30%   10  

Total  Customers/Day   59  

Demand  Forecast  Matrix  

Figure  10  

11  

$100    

Average  Ticket  Price  

59    

Customers/Day  

x   35%    

Conversion  rate  

x   =   $2,065    

Daily  Sales  

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEGY          FIN

ANCIAL          CO

NCLU

SION  

Page 18: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

• Place  • Promo-­‐Von  

• Price  • Product  

CreaVng  Value   Capturing  Value  

Delivering  Value  

CommunicaVng  Value  

MarkePng  Campaign  

Product,  Price,  Place,  and  PromoVon  Decisions  

The  Four  P’s  diagram  below  shows  SOUL’s  main  product,  price,  place,  and  promoVon  decisions  for  their  business  (figure  11).  The  diagram  starts  off  with  SOUL’s  product.  The  main  purpose  of  the  product  is  to  create  value  by  supplying  different  offerings.  SOUL  will  sell  acVvewear  brands  such  as  Nike,  Lululemon,  Under  Armour,  and  Adidas.  SOUL’s  employees  will  provide  great  customer  service  by  having  one  employee  always  working  with  customers  on  the  floor.  Next  in  the  diagram  is  price.  The  purpose  of  price  is  to  capture  value  for  the  customer  (McGraw  Hill  Irwin,  2015).  This  includes  everything  SOUL’s  customers  will  give  up  in  exchange  for  the  products  they  purchase  including  Vme,  money,  and  energy.    Most  customers  will  be  willing  to  pay  $100,  which  is  SOUL’s  average  Vcket  price.  Place  is  another  aspect  of  the  4  P’s.  Place  can  be  described  as  supply  chain  management  that  accounts  for  getng  the  product  to  the  correct  customer  exactly  when  the  customer  needs  it  (McGraw  Hill  Irwin,  2015).  SOUL  will  get  their  products  by  purchasing  from  the  wholesalers  of  each  brand  provided  in  the  store.  The  products  will  then  be  sent  to  SOUL  where  consumers  will  be  able  to  shop  a  variety  of  premium  brands.  PromoVon  is  a  key  aspect  of  the  4  P’s.  Marketers  communicate  promoVon  by  informing,  persuading,  and  reminding  customers  about  a  product.  SOUL  will  market  to  their  customers  through  social  media  sites  such  as  Facebook  and  Instagram,  as  well  as  SOUL’s  own  website.  Coupons  will  be  given  out  to  anract  customers  into  the  store.  Product,  price,  place,  and  promoVon  will  be  crucial  when  determining  the  success  of  SOUL.  

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

12  

©Nike  

©BloomingtonGateway  

Figure  11  

Page 19: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

MarkePng  Campaign    Atmosphere  and  Design    

SOUL  will  acquire  a  modern  and  relaxed  feel  throughout  the  enVre  store,  with  conVnuous  upbeat  music  playing  to  provide  the  customers  the  feeling  of  excitement  while  shopping.  SOUL’s  store  will  be  approximately  1,330  square  feet  designed  with  an  assortment  of  light  wood  flooring,  shelving,  and  tables,  giving  the  customer  a  comfortable  feeling.  When  a  customer  walks  in,  she  will  be  greeted  immediately  by  a  SOUL  employee  and  offered  any  assistance  she  may  need  throughout  her  shopping  experience.  The  mannequins  and  tables  located  by  the  entrance  will  be  featuring  SOUL’s  most  recent  merchandise.  The  new  trends  shown  on  the  mannequins  will  help  to  anract  daily  customers.  SOUL  will  have  cubic  shelving  units  around  the  store  containing  most  of  the  merchandise  such  as  leggings,  shorts,  and  tees.  Clothing  racks  will  be  used  to  display  other  items  such  as  zip-­‐ups  and  hoodies  along  with  SOUL’s  more  popular  items.  When  the  customer  is  ready  to  check  out,  a  SOUL  employee  will  place  their  purchase  in  a  recycled  bag,  thank  them  for  coming,  and  ask  them  to  visit  again.  SOUL’s  great  customer  service  will  help  the  store  retain  customer  loyalty  and  stay  true  to  their  mission  statement.  Refer  to  Appendix  I  for  detailed  store  layout.  

13  

Social  Media      

Copeland  Associates  recommend  the  use  of  social  media  to  market  SOUL  to  potenVal  customers  due  to  the  high  usage  performed  by  individuals  ages  18-­‐34  in  the  US.  In  the  18-­‐24  age  group,  62%  of  these  individuals  are  weekly  users  of  social  media  sites,  while  58%  of  individuals  ages  25-­‐34  are  also  using  social  media  weekly  (StaVsta,  2014).  Figure  12.2  shows  the  share  of  internet  users  in  the  U.S.  who  used  social  media  in  January  2014.  With  this  data  Copeland  Associates  chose  to  market  on  Facebook,  Instagram,  and  SOUl’s  own  website.  Refer  to  Appendix  J,  K  and  L  for  site  graphics.  

WEBSITE  

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

18-­‐29   30-­‐49   50-­‐64   65+  

Share  of  internet  users  who  use  social  networking  in  the  United  

States  in  January  2014,  by  age  group    

Facebook  

Figure  12.2  (StaVsta,  2014)  

   Facebook   is  a  social  networking  website  that  allows  users  to  connect  and  share  with  family,   friends,  and   businesses   online.   Facebook   has   157.1   million   users   as   of   2015   and   is   expected   to   reach   172  million  users  by  2019   (StaVsta,  2015).  SOUL  will  be  able   to  reach  a  wide  customer  base  due  to  how  many  users  are  projected.  There  are  32.1  million  U.S.  Facebook  users  between  the  ages  of  25  and  34  years  old  are  using  Facebook  the  most  on  a  daily  basis;  followed  by  26.2  million  people  using  the  site  between  the  ages  of  18  and  24  (StaVsta,  2015).  The  two  highest  users  of  Facebook  are  between  the  ages  of  18-­‐34  which   is  within  SOUL’s  target  market.  This   is  a  great  opportunity  for  SOUL.  Customers  who  follow  SOUL’s  Facebook  page  will  be  able  to  share  it  will  all  their  friends  and  spread  the  word  to  people  naVonwide.  Facebook  will  offer  coupons  and  special  promoVons  within  the  store,  and  provide  benefits  to  people  who  like  and  share  the  page.  By  users  sharing  SOUL’s  page,  it  will  become  visible  to  all  of  their  friends,  expanding  SOUL’s  market  area  .    

Figure  12.1  

Page 20: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

MarkePng  Campaign    

14  

Instagram  

Instagram  is  an  online  mobile  applicaVon  that  allows  the  user  to  share  photos,  videos,  and  social  network  with  various  other  users.  Once  a  video  or  photo  is  taken  the  user  can  share  them  on  other  social  networking  plazorms,  such  as  Twiner,  Facebook,  Tumblr,  and  Flickr.  Instagram  is  expected  to  grow  at  an  upward  trend.  In  2015  the  acVve  number  of  users  is  77.6  million  and  in  2019  that  number  is  expected  to  grow  to  111.6  million  acVve  users  (StaVsta,  2015).  In  2014  Instagram  gained  23%  in  acVve  users  and  is  considered  the  fastest  growing  social  media  site.  Instagram  will  be  an  asset  for  SOUL  because  it  directly  targets  the  corresponding  age  target  market.  The  two  highest  percentages  of  age  groups  using  the  social  media  site  are  27.6%  of  users  ages  18-­‐24  and  32.2%  of  users  ages  25-­‐34  (StaVsta,  2015).  Facebook  acquired  Instagram  in  2012;  because  of  this  acquisiVon  when  signing  up  for  an  Instagram  account  the  user  goes  through  Facebook.  The  user  can  then  add  friends  on  Facebook  who  use  the  Instagram  account.  SOUL  would  be  able  to  acVvely  follow  the  friends  they  have  on  Facebook.    SOUL  will  be  able  to  follow  Indiana  University  students  and  the  local  yoga  studios  to  keep  up  with  current  events  and  trends,  and  use  these  to  market  their  brand.            

Website  

With  SOUL’s  target  market  between  the  ages  of  18-­‐35  years  old,  it  is  necessary  to  have  a  strong  online  markeVng  component.  SOUL  created  an  easy  to  use  browser  that  allows  customers  to  learn  about  SOUL.  On  the  website  users  can  parVcipate  in  a  store  blog  that  discusses  SOUL’s  products.  The  blog  allows  customers  to  list  any  comments,  concerns,  quesVons,  and  suggesVons  to  SOUL.  The  website  contains  a  gallery  of  SOUL’s  current  products.  There  is  a  component  to  SOUL’s  website  that  is  unique.  A  customer  may  purchase  a  product  from  the  website  and  pick  it  up  in  store  at  their  earliest  convenience.  This  helps  the  customer  avoid  shipping  costs  and  encourages  them  to  visit  the  store.  SOUL’s  website  also  lists  all  contact  informaVon  including  the  store  email,  phone  number,  and  other  used  social  media.  Like  SOUL’s  atmosphere  in  the  store,  the  website  is  designed  to  be  modern  and  trendy.  SOUL  will  be  using  Website  Builder  to  create  and  manage  their  ecommerce  website.  The  cost  of  Website  Builder  is  set  at  an  affordable  price  of  $7.38  a  month.    

Figure  13  

Page 21: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

MarkePng  Campaign     INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

Coupon  

15  

To  raise  brand  awareness  Copeland  Associates  decided  to  create  coupons  in  the  form  of  business  cards  to  anract  customers  into  SOUL.  These  coupons  will  be  placed  at  the  four  local  yoga  studios  and  around  Indiana  University’s  campus.  SOUL’s  coupon  is  10%  off  the  customer’s  first  purchase  within  the  first  year.  SOUL  will  use  VistaPrint  to  produce  5,000  coupons  for  the  price  of  $80.  It  is  proven  95%  of  all  shoppers  like  coupons,  and  60%  of  consumers  acVvely  look  for  coupons  (A.C.  Nielson  Co.,  2014).  The  coupon  would  convince  customers  who  have  been  shopping  at  SOUL’s  compeVtors  to  come  into  the  store,  create  brand  awareness,  and  increase  the  market  area.  Customers  will  view  the  coupon  as  an  opportunity  to  come  into  SOUL  and  look  for  new  types  of  apparel  that  are  not  offered  at  compeVtor’s  stores.  For  example,  Lululemon  is  not  offered  at  Dicks,  MC  Sports,  Wal-­‐Mart,  and  other  chain  department  stores  in  Bloomington.  The  coupon  will  create  brand  awareness  as  more  customers  visit  SOUL.  This  creates  a  cause  and  effect  approach,  as  more  customers  visit  the  store  and  tell  their  friends  about  SOUL  and  the  coupon.  When  customers  come  into  the  store  and  conVnuously  purchase  the  same  product,  the  SOUL  employees  will  noVce  trends  and  up-­‐sell  the  products  purchased.    

Pandora  Radio  

Copeland  Associates  chose  the  popular  Pandora  Radio  app  to  adverVse  SOUL.  Pandora  allows  users  to  create  and  keep  playlists  in  their  profile  and  introduces  users  to  new  music  based  on  their  preferred  playlists.  The  internet  radio  has  80  million  loyal  monthly  listeners  (Pandora,  2015).  With  Pandora  Radio’s  advanced  technology,  they  are  able  to  track  a  specific  targeted  region  and  age  group,  and  from  there  are  able  to  suggest  music  that  fits  into  the  lifestyle  of  the  user.  SOUL  will  uVlize  this  technology  by  targeVng  the  18-­‐35  year  old  age  group  in  Bloomington,  Indiana,  who  listen  to  upbeat  music.  SOUL’s  radio  adverVsement  will  run  for  fi`een  seconds  with  a  visual  display  ad  on  screen.  For  every  one  thousand  adverVsements  played,  the  cost  will  be  $10.    

Figure  14.1  

Figure  14.2  

Page 22: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Management  InformaPon  System  

16  

ShopKeep  

Running  a  startup  retail  store  requires  SOUL  to  have  an  efficient  point  of  sale  (POS)  management  system.  This  system  must  be  able  to  track  inventory,  product  sales,  customer  and  employee  management,  and  report  vital  informaVon  on  a  daily  basis.  With  that,  SOUL  has  chosen  ShopKeep,  a  cloud-­‐based  point  of  sale  system  for  the  store.  ShopKeep  is  capable  of  providing  SOUL  with  all  the  key  management  system  elements  it  will  need  to  run  effecVvely.    

Order  and  Sales  Management  

ShopKeep  allows  employees  to  easily  record  an  order  sale  in  the  system  by  simply  tapping  the  item  on  the  iPad  register,  which  places  the  item  in  the  customer’s  shopping  cart  above  the  products  offered  dashboard.  From  there,  the  employee  can  change  the  quanVty  of  the  item  if  needed.  The  order  receipt  is  shown  on  the  right  side  of  the  screen  with  the  tax  setngs  already  included.  Customers  have  the  opVon  of  paying  with  cash  or  credit,  and  also  have  the  opVon  of  having  their  receipt  printed  out  or  emailed  to  them.  All  sales  per  day  are  recorded  in  the  BackOffice  feature  of  ShopKeep.    

Customer  and  Employee  Management  

ShopKeep  allows  the  store  great  access  to  new  and  exisVng  customers.  When  a  customer  is  checking  out,  the  cashier  can  click  on  the  walk-­‐in  tab  above  the  sale  receipt,  which  will  create  a  drop  down  list  of  exisVng  customers.  If  the  customer  is  not  on  this  list,  the  cashier  can  simply  add  them  and  their  contact  informaVon  to  the  list.  A`er  the  transacVon  is  recorded,  cashiers  can  look  in  the  BackOffice  feature  of  ShopKeep  to  monitor  any  customer’s  purchasing  frequency  over  the  past  90  days  as  well  as  what  they  bought  and  the  price  of  that  item.  As  for  employees,  ShopKeep  allows  them  to  clock  in  and  out  by  simply  typing  in  their  4-­‐digit  password,  same  as  an  iPhone  or  iPad.    

ReporVng  and  AnalyVcs  

ShopKeep  offers  a  number  of  different  analyVcs  channels  that  can  be  found  under  the  analyVcs  dashboard  in  the  back  office  program.  This  reporVng  allows  employees  to  set  a  recommended  inventory  amount  that  noVfies  the  store  when  inventory  has  fallen  below  the  recommended  amount.  This  applicaVon  also  allows  in  depth  reporVng  on  customer  history,  tender  transacVons,  employee  Vme  clock  records,  and  markeVng  campaigns.  See  figure  X  for  a  back  office  visual.    

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

©Shopkeep  Figure  15.1  

©Shopkeep  Figure  15.2  

Page 23: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

17  

The  inventory  management  system  for  ShopKeep  is  extremely  user  friendly  and  makes  it  easy  to  add,  change,  or  remove  product  informaVon.  New  inventory  can  easily  be  added  to  the  system  by  using  the  Bluetooth  scanner.    One  of  the  most  effecVve  inventory  management  features  ShopKeep  offers  is  the  inventory  alerts.  This  feature  will  make  an  alert  when  the  inventory  reaches  a  certain  level.  These  alerts  make  sure  the  store  will  never  run  out  of  the  top  selling  items.  This  system  also  has  a  feature  to  automaVcally  repurchase  inventory  from  a  supplier.    

Inventory  Management   Product  Management  

Another  crucial  feature  that  ShopKeep  offers  is  the  sales  reports  that  it  provides  on  a  daily,  weekly,  and  monthly  basis.  Not  only  does  it  provide  informaVon,  but  also  analyzes  data  and  gives  feedback  to  help  Copeland  Associates  make  bener  business  decisions.  ShopKeep  provides  daily  comparisons,  top  selling  items,  and  the  most  profitable  items.  For  every  item,  ShopKeep  keeps  track  of  the  cost  and  profit  margin.  Products  can  be  arranged  by  department,  category,  or  supplier.  Refer  to  figure  16  for  the  ShopKeep  cashier  transacVon  screen.  Refer  to  Appendix  E  for  MIS  dashboard.  

Management  InformaPon  System  Cont.   INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

©Shopkeep  Figure  16  

Page 24: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

18  

Pro  Forma  Statements  of  Financial  PosiPon   Pro  Forma  Statements  of  OperaPon  

Financial  Analysis  

The  cost  necessary  to  start  the  business  is  $227,298.50.    This  cost  includes  the  capital  necessary  for  inventory,  property  and  equipment.    More  informaVon  about  start  up  expenses  can  be  found  in  Appendix  A.1.  The  company’s  long  term  liabiliVes  are  30%  of  the  assets  and  70%  of  the  company’s  assets  are  paid  in  equity  capital.  There  are  no  accrued  expenses  or  accounts  payable  at  this  Vme.  The  owner  will  receive  15%  of  profits  and  the  rest  of  the  profits  will  be  saved  as  cash.  It  is  Copeland  Associates’  goal  for  SOUL  to  have  enough  cash  saved  at  the  end  of  year  five  to  start  manufacturing  their  own  products.    

Based  on  the  demand  scenarios  Copeland  Associates  created,  21  customers  will  purchase  products  at  the  store  everyday.  A`er  finding  the  average  transacVon  price  of  the  benchmark  companies,  SOUL’s  average  transacVon  is  esVmated  to  be  $100  per  customer.  It  is  expected  by  year  two  SOUL  will  reach  its  demand  and  by  year  five  35  customers  will  be  making  purchases  everyday.  More  informaVon  about  the  cost  of  goods  sold  and  store  expenses  can  be  found  in  Appendix  A.2.  The  sales  tax  is  recorded  as  an  expense  on  the  income  statement  and  the  state  and  federal  incomes  taxes  are  taken  into  account  to  find  the  income  tax  rate.  (See  figure  17)  

SOUL Pro Forma Statements of Operations

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Sales (a) $639,000 $745,500 $852,000 $1,029,500 $1,242,500 Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs (b) 469,000 543,550 618,100 742,350 891,450

Gross profit 170,000 201,950 233,900 287,150 351,050

Direct store expenses (c) 142,563 139,196 138,520 142,115 138,115

General and administrative expenses 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pre-opening expenses 106,898

Operating income (80,461) 61,754 94,380 144,035 211,935

Interest expense (6,437) 4,940 7,550 11,523 16,955

Income before income taxes (74,024) 56,814 86,829 132,512 194,980 Provision for income taxes (12,214) 13,123 32,432 46,823 85,462

Net income $(61,810) $43,692 $54,397 $85,689 $109,518

Figure  17  

Page 25: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

19  

Financial  Analysis  Capital  Budget  Analysis  

The  start  up  costs  necessary  for  SOUL  to  operate  efficiently  are  $227,298.50.  A`er  reaching  the  demand  forecast  of  21  customers  in  year  two,  sales  are  predicted  to  increase  14%  in  year  three,  20%  in  year  four,  and  20%  again  in  year  five.  These  predicVons  are  based  off  markeVng  investments  and  informaVon  from  benchmark  companies.  In  year  five,  SOUL  will  generate  income  of  $109,518.  The  horizon  value  of  the  company  is  $847,739  at  the  end  of  year  five,  based  on  a  market  mulVple  of  four.  The  net  present  value  of  SOUL  is  $154458  and  Copeland  Associates  predict  the  internal  rate  of  return  is  23.5%  with  a  payback  period  of  2.75  years.  Based  on  analysis  of  this  decision  making  criteria,  Copeland  Associates  determined  that  SOUL  is  a  feasible  project.  Detailed  capital  budget  analysis  and  decision  making  criteria  can  be  found  in  Appendix  A.3.  

Feasibility  of  SOUL  

Required Rate of Return

Weighted average cost of capital (WACC):

Capital x Cost of x After-Tax = WACC Structure Capital Adjustment

Debt 30% x 8% x 66% = 1.57%

Equity 70% x 8% = 5.52%

7.09%

Decision-Making Criteria

Net present value = 154,458

Internal rate of return = 23.50%

Payback period = 3.29

The  capital  budget  analysis  starts  out  by  determining  the  EBIT  and  finding  the  operaVng  profit  a`er  tax.  Next,  the  depreciaVon  and  amorVzaVon  expenses  are  added  back  because  these  are  non  cash  expenses.  This  number  is  the  operaVng  cash  flow.  Copeland  Associates  then  subtracted  the  change  in  net  working  capital  and  capital  spending  to  find  the  free  cash  flow  of  each  year.  To  conVnue  the  capital  budget  analysis,  Copeland  Associates  determined  the  weighted  average  cost  of  capital  to  be  7.09%  (figure  18.1).  Finally,  in  order  to  determine  whether  or  not  the  project  is  feasible,  the  net  present  value,  internal  rate  of  return,  and  payback  period  were  calculated  (figure  18.2).  

Figure  18.2  

Figure  18.1  

Page 26: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

INTRO

         EXTERNAL          CO

NCEPT            DEM

AND            STRATEG

Y          FINAN

CIAL          CONCLU

SION  

20  

Conclusion    Summary  

The  global  acVvewear  market,  driven  by  women’s  acVvewear,  is  expected  to  grow  to  $178  billion  by  2019.  U.S.  women’s  expenditure  is  increasing  at  approximately  $2  million  each  year.  The  increase  of  size  and  expenditure  on  women’s  acVvewear  can  be  anributed  to  the  new  and  casual  fashion  trend  where  people  are  using  acVvewear  as  casual  atre.  This  growth  creates  an  opportunity  to  open  a  specialty  women’s  acVvewear  store  focusing  on  the  emerging  “athleisure”  trend.  For  this  reason,  Copeland  Associates  predict  success  for  women’s  acVvewear  in  the  retail  industry.      Copeland  Associates  developed  a  business  concept  that  involves  creaVng  a  premium  women’s  acVvewear  store  located  in  Bloomington,  Indiana.  The  store,  SOUL,  has  a  compeVVve  advantage  because  of  the  lack  of  direct  compeVtors  in  the  surrounding  area.  SOUL  offers  high  quality  brands  such  as  Nike,  Lululemon,  Under  Armour,  and  Adidas  to  women  ages  18-­‐35.  SOUL’s  business  model  strives  to  create  a  modern  and  upbeat  atmosphere  that  will  get  women  excited  to  shop.      Copeland  Associates  developed  two  demand  scenarios  based  on  SOUL’s  benchmark  companies,  Bloomington  demographics,  and  industry  averages.  The  first  demand  scenario  was  calculated  using  primary  data  research  that  was  found  by  conducVng  phone  interviews  with  store  employees.  A`er  retrieving  the  correct  informaVon,  SOUL  predicted  it  would  have  an  average  of  70  customers  per  day.  The  second  demand  scenario  was  calculated  using  secondary  research  such  as  Bloomington’s  female  populaVon,  women’s  acVvewear  market  share  of  the  total  apparel  industry,  the  percentage  of  women  who  purchase  acVvewear,  number  of  local  compeVtors,  and  SOUL’s  days  of  operaVon.  This  second  demand  scenario  suggested  that  SOUL  would  have  an  average  of  33  customers  per  day.      These  two  demand  scenarios  were  weighed  against  each  other.  Demand  scenario  one  received  a  weight  of  70%  because  of  the  realisVc  numbers  provided  by  already  exisVng  benchmark  companies.  Demand  scenario  two  received  a  weight  of  30%  because  the  data  was  extracted  from  secondary  research  on  the  acVvewear  market  and  demographics  of  Bloomington.  Following  the  weights  of  the  two  demand  scenarios,  it  was  calculated  SOUL  would  have  a  final  average  of  59  customers  per  day.                              

Figure  19  

Page 27: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPENDIX    

21  

Page 28: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  A.1  Statement  of  Financial  PosiPon  

Start-Up Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Cash $119,800.50 $39,232.54 $62,162.21 $88,741.34 $136,169.22 $202,951.49 Inventory $100,935.00 $101,935.00 $98,385.00 $100,285.00 $107,935.00 $116,485.00 Prepaid expenses

Prepaid Insurance $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00

$840.00 $600.00

Total current assets $221,335.50 $141,767.54 $161,147.21 $189,626.34 $244,704.22 $320,036.49 Property and equipment, net (a) $5,863.00 $5,217.00 $4,571.00 $3,925.00 $3,279.00 $2,633.00 Intangible assets, net $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Total assets $227,298.50 $147,084.54 $165,818.21 $193,651.34 $248,083.22 $322,769.49

Accounts payable - - - - - - Accrued expenses - - - - - - Current portion of long-term debt $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71

Total current liabilities $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71 $6,134.71 Long-term debt $62,054.84 $43,650.71 $25,246.58 $6,842.45 -$11,561.68 -$29,965.81

Total liabilities $68,189.55 $49,785.42 $31,381.29 $12,977.16 -$5,426.97 -$23,831.10 Paid-in equity capital $159,108.95 $159,108.95 $159,108.95 $159,108.95 $159,108.95 $159,108.95 Retained earnings (b) - -$61,809.83 -$24,672.03 $21,565.22 $94,401.24 $187,491.63

Total equity $159,108.95 $97,299.12 $134,436.92 $180,674.18 $253,510.19 $346,600.59 Total liabilities and equity $227,298.50 $147,084.54 $165,818.21 $193,651.34 $248,083.22 $322,769.49

(a) Property and equipment, net:

Fixtures and equipment $5,275.00 $5,275.00 $5,275.00 $5,275.00 $5,275.00 $5,275.00 Computer hardware and software $588.00 $588.00 $588.00 $588.00 $588.00 $588.00

Less: Accumulated depr and amort $646.00 $1,292.00 $1,938.00 $2,584.00 $3,230.00 Property and equipment, net $5,863.00 $5,217.00 $4,571.00 $3,925.00 $3,279.00 $2,633.00

(b) Retained earnings:

Balance, beginning of year - $- -$61,809.83 -$24,672.03 $21,565.22 $94,401.24 Net income -$61,809.83 -$61,809.83 $43,691.53 $54,396.77 $85,689.43 $109,518.11 Less: Distribution to owner - $- $6,553.73 $8,159.52 $12,853.41 $16,427.72

Balance, end of year -$61,809.83 -$61,809.83 -$24,672.03 $21,565.22 $94,401.24 $187,491.63

22  

Page 29: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  A.2  Statement  of  OperaPons  

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Sales (a) $639,000 $745,500 $852,000 $1,029,500 $1,242,500 Cost of goods sold and occupany costs (b) 469,000 543,550 618,100 742,350 891,450

Gross profit 170,000 201,950 233,900 287,150 351,050 Direct store expenses (c) 142,563 139,196 138,520 142,115 138,115 General and administrative expenses 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pre-opening expenses 106,898

Operating income (80,461) 61,754 94,380 144,035 211,935 Interest expense (6,437) 4,940 7,550 11,523 16,955

Income before income taxes (74,024) 56,814 86,829 132,512 194,980 Provision for income taxes (12,214) 13,123 32,432 46,823 85,462

Net income $(61,810) $43,692 $54,397 $85,689 $109,518

(a) Sales:

Number of customers per day 18 21 24 29 35 x Average transaction value 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sales per day 1,800 2,100 2,400 2,900 3,500 x Number of days open per year 355 355 355 355 355

Sales $639,000 $745,500 $852,000 $1,029,500 $1,242,500

(b) Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs:

Cost of goods sold $402,570 $469,665 $536,760 $648,585 $782,775 Sales Tax $44,730 $52,185 $59,640 $72,065 $86,975 Rent 19,950 19,950 19,950 19,950 19,950 Utilities

Electric 800 800 800 800 800 Phone Bill 250 250 250 250 250 Internet 500 500 500 500 500 Water 200 200 200 200 200 Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs $469,000 $543,550 $618,100 $742,350 $891,450

(c) Direct store expenses:

Store payroll, payroll taxes, and benefits $136,240 $136,240 $136,240 $136,240 $136,240 Store supplies 150 150 150 150 150 Depreciation and amortization 1,173 1,806 1,130 725 725 Advertising 5,000 1,000 1,000 5000 1,000

Direct store expenses $142,563 $139,196 $138,520 $142,115 $138,115

23  

Page 30: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  A.3  Capital  BudgePng  Analysis  

Project Cash Flows

0 1 2 3 4 5

EBITDA $ (80,461) $ 61,754 $ 94,380 $ 144,035 $ 211,935 - Depreciation and amortization 1,173 1,806 1,130 725 725

EBIT (81,633) 59,949 93,249 143,309 211,209 x (1 - tax rate) 0.835 0.785 0.685 0.685 0.655

Operating profit after tax - 68,163.72 47,059.81 63,875.70 98,166.97 138,342.18 + Depreciation and amortization 1,173 1,806 1,130 725 725

Operating cash flow $ - $ (66,991) $ 48,865 $ 65,006 $ 98,892 $ 139,067 - Change in net working capital (215,201) - 79,567.96 50,647 (19,925) (64,172) (105,280) - Capital spending (5,963)

Free cash flow $ (209,238) $ 12,577 $ (1,782) $ 84,931 $ 163,065 $ 244,348 + Horizon value (end of year 5) 847,739

Project cash flow $ 1,092,087

EBITDA (year 5) $ 211,935 x Market multiple 4.0

Horizon value (end of year 5) $ 847,739

Required Rate of Return

Weighted average cost of capital (WACC):

Capital x

Cost of x

After-Tax = WACC

Structure Capital Adjustment

Debt 30% x 8% x 66% = 1.57%

Equity 70% x 8% = 5.52%

7.09%

Decision-Making Criteria

Net present value = 154,458

Internal rate of return = 23.50%

Payback period = 3.29

24  

Page 31: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  A.4  Quarterly  Cash  Flows  for  Year  1  

Quarterly Projected Cash Flows

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4

1 2 3 4

EBITDA -

$16,092.12

$(24,138) $(24,138) -

$16,092.12

- Depreciation and amortization 293.15 293 293.15 293.15

EBIT -

$16,385.27

$(24,431) $(24,431) -

$16,385.27

x (1 - tax rate) 0.835 0.835 0.835 0.835 Operating profit after tax

-$13,681.70 (20,400) -$20,400.16

-$13,681.70

+ Depreciation and amortization 293.15 293 293.15 293.15

Operating cash flow -

$13,388.55

$(20,107) -$20,107.01 -

$13,388.55 - Change in net working capital -19,891.99 (19,892) -19,891.99 -19,891.99 - Capital spending

Free cash flow $6,503.44 ($215) ($215.02) $6,503.44

Based  on  seasonality,  the  EBITDA  will  be  high  is  quarter  2  and  quarter  3.  

25  

Page 32: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  B  Inventory  Leggings    Price     QuanVty    Total  Cost    Under  Armour    $179.99     40    $7,199.60    Under  Armour    $89.99     65    $5,849.35    Lulu    $98.00     60    $5,880.00    Lulu    $88.00     65    $5,720.00    Lulu    $92.00     65    $5,980.00    Nike    $100.00     50    $5,000.00    Nike    $150.00     40    $6,000.00    Adidas    $100.00     50    $5,000.00    Total    $46,628.95    

Tank  Tops  Lulu    $64.00     50    $3,200.00    Lulu    $64.00     50    $3,200.00    Nike    $50.00     50    $2,500.00    Nike    $40.00     60    $2,400.00    Adidas    $55.00     50    $2,750.00    Under  Armour    $64.99     50    $3,249.50    Total    $17,299.50    

Jackets  Under  Armour    $84.99     40    $3,399.60    Under  Armour    $69.99     50    $3,499.50    Lulu    $98.00     50    $4,900.00    Lulu    $108.00     50    $5,400.00    Nike    $65.00     50    $3,250.00    Total    $20,449.10    

Shorts  Nike    $55.00     40    $95.00    Nike    $45.00     40    $85.00    Lulu    $58.00     40    $98.00    Total    $278.00    

Accessories  Lulu-­‐Yoga  Mat    $78.00     30    $2,340.00    Lulu  -­‐  Water  Bonle    $18.00     30    $540.00    Adidas-­‐Yoga  Purse    $80.00     30    $2,400.00    Adidas-­‐Backback    $120.00     25    $3,000.00    Under  Armour-­‐Headband    $19.99     30    $599.70    Total    $8,879.70    

Sports  Bras  Lulu    $48.00     50    $2,400.00    Adidas    $45.00     50    $2,250.00    Nike    $55.00     50    $2,750.00    Total    $7,400.00    

Total  Inventory   1400    $100,935.25    

26  

Page 33: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  C    SWOT  Analysis  

•  Complete  online  stores  where  customers  do  not  physically  have  to  go  into  a  store  to  purchase  clothes  

 •  Lower  priced  stores,  customers  may  feel  

that  SOUL  is  not  giving  the  best  deal  for  their  merchandise    

•  Knowledge  –  our  employees  will  be  well  rounded  and  knowledgeable  about  what  they  are  selling  

•  RelaVonship  –  with  SOUL  being  a  smaller  store  and  smaller  staff,  our  employees  will  work  one  on  one  with  customers  and  really  interact  with  them  

•  Merchandise  –  we  are  a  high  quality  reseller  of  altheVcwear’s  most  popular  brand  names  

•  Brand  power  –  we  are  a  new  store  in    town  with  no  brand,  consumers  do  not  know  who  we  are  yet  

•  High  prices  –  SOUL  is  considered  more  of  a  premium  retailer  which  means  we  have  the  best  quality  but  with  being  in  a    college  town  will  consumers  pay  these  prices?    

•  By  being  just  a  women’s  athleVcwear  retailer  we  have  the  opportunity  to  be  very  successful  based  on  projected  sales  within  this  industry  

•  If  SOUL  is  as  successful  as  projected,  we  are  interested  in  creaVng  and  manufacturing  our  very  own  athleVcwear  brand  to  sell    

27  

Page 34: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  D.1  

Key  Partners:    

Key  AcPviPes:    SOUL  currently  works  to  sell  a  variety  of  premium  athleVcwear  brands  to  women  ages  18  to  34.  

Key  Resources:    •  Retails  in  Bloomington,  

Indiana  •  Wholesales  4  premium  

brands    

 Value  ProposiPons:    

Customer  Segments:    SOUL  has  many  different  segments  due  to  the  fact  they  sell  a  variety  of  brands  such  as  Lululemon,  Nike,  Under  Armour,  and  Adidas.  SOUL  also  offers  different  types  of  acVvewear  including    leggings,  sports  bras,  tank  tops,  outerwear,  and  accessories.  

SOUL  offers  name  brand  acVvewear  at  a  premium  value.  Through  SOUL’s  website  customers  are  able  to  purchase  acVvewear  online  which  will  then  be  delivered  to  the  Bloomington  store  where  customers  can  pick  up  their  purchases.  In  the  future,  SOUL  will  offer  yoga  classes  and  different  acVviVes  for  their  customers.  

SOUL  partners  with  a  few  brands  which  they  sell  to  customers  including:  •  Nike  •  Under  Armour  •  Adidas  •  Lululemon  In  the  future  SOUL  plans  to  partner  with  the  yoga  studios  around  Bloomington,  Indiana  to  offer  a  variety  of  acVviVes  for  customers.  

Business  Model  Canvas    

28  

Page 35: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  D.2    

Cost  Structure:  

Revenue  Streams:   $  

Customer  RelaPonships:   Channels:  Due  to  the  increasing  demand  in  “athleisure  wear”  SOUL  must  have  a  strong  relaVonship  with  their  customers.  SOUL  does  not  have  many  compeVtors  in  the  Bloomington  area,  so  markeVng  their  store  to  Indiana  University  and  community  members  is  key.  

Products  are  distributed  through  wholesalers.  In  the  next  5  years  SOUL  will  manufacture  their  own  products.  SOUL  markets  to  women  college  students  and  community  members  ages  18  to  34  using  direct  sale  methods.  

SOUL  is  a  premium  brand,  therefore  their  products  are  a  linle  more  expensive.  Their  average  Vcket  price  is  $100.  SOUL  has  seven  employees,  therefore  they  do  not  need  to  provide  pay  and  benefits  for  as  many  people.  Small  benefits  will  only  be  given  to  the  two  managers.  

Business  Model  Canvas    

29  

Page 36: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  E    MIS  Dashboard    

30  

Page 37: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPENDIX    F.1  

PoliPcal  macro-­‐environment    Increasing  numbers  of  manufacturers  in  the  apparel  industry  are  outsourcing  to  manufacture  their  goods.  The  US,  European  Union  and  Japan  are  the  largest  importers  of  apparel  and  together  account  for  90%  of  imported  apparel  (Mintel,  2015).  This  is  due  to  the  lower  labor  costs  and  the  high  labor  content  of  products  located  abroad.  While  outsourcing  is  an  opportunity  for  companies  to  be  profitable  they  must  depend  on  trade  regulaVons.  Import  protecVon  is  provided  through  a  series  of  tariffs  that  limit  the  quanVty  of  imports  from  specific  countries.  Recently,  the  US  has  lowered  its  protecVon  of  the  apparel  industry  and  the  trend  is  expected  to  conVnue.  An  opportunity  the  US  and  EU  are  pursuing  is  sourcing  in  Africa.  The  free-­‐trade  agreement  allows  African  countries  to  grow  their  own  conon,  which  shortens  the  supply  chain  allowing  clothing  manufactures  to  go  from  fiber  to  factor  in  a  single  place.    

   

Social  macro-­‐environment      Athleisure-­‐wear  Market:  trend  towards  casualizaVon  as  people  are  shi`ing  towards  acVve  wear  other  than  other  categories.  Market  boundaries  are  blurring  together  as  acVve  wear  for  exercise  blends  into  every  day  wear.  Fitness  clothing  is  becoming  more  fashionable  for  many  people,  therefore  retailers  are  conVnuing  to  provide  a  wide  variety  of  opVons  for  styles  such  as  panerns,  colors,  fabric,  and  technology.  Fitness  apparel  is  not  just  for  fitness  anymore,  consumers  want  clothing  that  is  comfortable,  durable,  performance  oriented,  and  stylish.    Wear  athleVc  clothing  in  gym,  yoga  studio,  home  

Comfort  is  the  top  most  important  anribute  in  fitness  clothing  with  69%  of  responses.  This  is  due  to  the  casualizaVon  trend  and  desire  for  athleVc  wear  to  become  day  wear  as  well    Threats:  raising  obesity  rates  

Table:  social  environment  Source:  lightspeed  GMI/Mintel  

31  

Page 38: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  F.2      Technology  macro-­‐environment    “People  want  clothes  that  feel  luxurious,  but  have  performance  anributes  to  support  a  full-­‐contact  lifestyle,”  said  Shannon  Wilson,  the  co-­‐founder  of  luxury  acVvewear  brand  Kit  &  Ace,  and  ex-­‐head  designer  for  Lululemon  (Forbes,  2015).  In  recent  years,  luxury  acVvewear,  coined  as  “Athleisure”,  has  become  a  prominent  trend  in  the  world  of  women’s  fashion.  Designers  and  manufacturers  face  the  daily  banle  of  creaVng  a  product  that  is  of  the  latest  technological  quality  yet  is  fashionable  enough  to  wear  out  in  daily  casual  setngs.        C-­‐Dri  technology  is  the  process  of  uVlizing  a  moisture-­‐management  fabric  aimed  at  keeping  athletes  cool  and  dry.  The  fabric  has  engineered  yarn  that  is  sVtched  in  a  unique  panern,  allowing  moisture  to  move  from  the  skin  through  the  fabric,  helping  individual’s  to  stay  cool  and  dry.  This  fabric  has  been  seen  as  a  bener  alternaVve  to  tradiVonal  100%  or  polyester  fabrics  because  of  its  unique  drying  and  cooling  abiliVes  (Chasse).  C-­‐Dri  was  originally  introduced  as  a  fabric  used  for  cheerleading  uniforms,  but  since  has  begun  to  be  used  by  Colosseum  AthleVc  CorporaVon  for  the  company’s  women’s  acVve  wear  line.  The  company  uses  C-­‐Dri  in  products  such  as  cross-­‐body  sweaters,  slub-­‐knit  sweats  pants  and  mesh  tanks  (Fashionista,  2015).    Space  Dye  fabric  has  become  a  staple  in  the  world  of  yoga  wear,  specifically  yoga  pants.  This  technique  involves  the  use  of  the  chemical  mordant,  which  helps  to  fixate  the  dye  to  the  yarn  a`er  the  process  is  complete  (Fabriclink,  2013).  Space  dye  has  become  synonymous  with  the  mulV-­‐colored,  striped,  blurred  dye  look  it  creates.  The  dyeing  method  gained  notoriety  when  popular  yoga  brand  Lululemon  began  uVlizing  the  technique  for  their  yoga  pants  in  2011  (Self,  2011).  Recently,  the  technique  was  used  by  yoga  brand  Beyond  Yoga,  who  used  Space  Dye  as  the  fabric  foundaVon  for  a  new  yoga  collecVon  collaboraVon  with  Gwyneth  Paltrow  in  2014  (Fashionista  2015).        

Other  new  technology  in  women’s  acVve  wear  include  using  ballet  warm  up  gear  for  the  basis  of  top  and  bonoms,  snakeskin  leggings,  and  basic  non  print-­‐crazy  athleVc  styles  that  can  be  easily  used  in  everyday  ouzits  (Fashionista  2015).        As  large  and  compeVVve  the  fashion  industry  is,  it’s  difficult  for  companies  and  designers  to  respond  and  keep  up  with  current  trends  in  the  industry.  With  only  access  to  data  from  previous  seasons  and  inspiring  trend  sites  for  the  next  season,  the  industry  as  a  whole  o`en  experiences  waste  because  it  is  hard  to  give  the  right  price  to  the  right  product  at  the  right  Vme.  This  issue  has  led  to  the  creaVon  of  the  big  data  warehouse  ‘Editd’  based  in  London,  which  is  currently  the  largest  apparel  data  warehouse  in  the  world  with  more  than  53  billion  data  points.  The  tools  on  Editd’s  site  are  there  to  help  fashion  industry  professionals  track  and  understand  the  compeVVon  as  well  as  to  help  them  product  plan.  Instead  of  going  through  the  long  process  of  compeVVve  shopping,  industry  professionals  can  simply  run  a  query  on  Editd  and  receive  the  informaVon  they  need  in  a  categorized  manner.    

32  

Page 39: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  F.3  Environment  macro-­‐environment      Consumer  disposable  income  plays  a  significant  role  in  apparel  retail  sales.    Increase  in  household  income  is  directly  proporVonal  with  consumer  spending  on  nonessenVal  items.    The  way  that  consumers  measure  economic  prosperity  is  called  “consumer  confidence.”    If  consumer  confidence  is  high,  demand  for  clothing  increase  and  if  it  is  low,  demand  decreases.  In  Vmes  when  low  consumer  confidence  exists,  stores  with  more  bargains  tend  to  perform  bener  than  stores  with  more  expensive  prices.    Retailers  can  sVll  be  successful  during  Vmes  of  low  consumer  confidence  by  focusing  on  keeping  prices  lower  than  their  compeVtors.    Also,  they  can  increase  sales  by  trying  to  encourage  more  customers  to  make  less  expensive  purchases  rather  than  fewer  customers  making  more  expensive  purchases.  The  price  of  conon  is  criVcal  for  retail  manufacturers.    An  increase  or  decrease  in  the  price  of  conon  will  directly  affect  the  price  that  retailers  pay  for  their  product.    Higher  conon  prices  forces  retailers  to  either  take  a  cut  in  profit  margins  or  raise  their  prices.    Since  2010,  the  price  of  conon  has  decreased  almost  30  cents  per  pounds  and  is  expected  to  increase  next  year.  (IBISWorld)    

33  

Page 40: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Appendix:  CompePtors      

Store   Avg.  Price   Brands    

Target   $30   Champion  Tulah  by  Soybu  

Macy’s   $50   Nike,  Calvin  Klein,  Ideology,  North  Face,  Under  Armour,  Adidas  

Dunham’s   $30   Champion,  Under  Armour,  90  Degree    

Dick’s   $60-­‐$70   North  Face,  Nike,  Calia  by  Carrie  Underwood,  Reebok,  Lucy    

MC  Sports   $25-­‐$30   Under  Armour,  Nike  

Walmart   $10-­‐$15   Danskin,  Hanes,  Fruit  of  the  Loom,  Avia  

Seaview   $110   Patagonia,  Kuhal,  W’s,  Ray  Bans,  Columbia,  Oakley,  Vineyard  Vines,  Pelican  

Indiana  Running  Company  

$80   Nike,  Puma,  Adidas,  New  Balance,  Reebok      

Athleta   $90   Their  own  brand  

LuluLemon   $100   Their  own  brand  

TIS  Bookstore   $60   Under  Armour,  Adidas    

APPEN

DIX  G    

34  

Page 41: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Appendix:  Products  Offered        

APPEN

DIX  H    

35  

Page 42: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Appendix:  Interior  Layout  of  SOUL    

The  interior  of  the  store  will  have  a  modern  and  relaxing  feel.    Upbeat  music  will  be  playing  during  store  hours  to  make  women  feel  excited  to  shop.  

Source:  (DapperQ,  2013)  

Source:  (DapperQ,  2013)  

Source:  (DapperQ,  2013)  

APPEN

DIX  I.1    

36  

Page 43: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

Appendix:  Interior  Layout  of  SOUL     APPEN

DIX  I.2    

SOUL Floor Plan 1280 N. College Avenue provides SOUL with a quality commercial area to promote its brand. This retail space is 50 feet long and 26 feet wide, allowing for a comfortable but spacious environment throughout the store. Upon entry, customers will see new products on display tables. Two of these display tables are circular and have mannequins on them showcasing SOUL’s apparel. On the right side of the store are four changing rooms with upper hanging and display shelving on both sides. On the left side of the store is SOUL’s cash register counter with SOUL’s logo on the wall behind it. In the middle of the room is a hanging display rack. The back left corner of the room consists of a new product display table on the left wall followed by a window display with three mannequins. Below is the floor plan for SOUL’s interior layout.

37  

Page 44: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  J    Appendix:  Facebook    

Facebook  page  on  browser    

38  

Page 45: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX  K  

Appendix:  Instagram    

Instagram  mobile  app  on  iphone    

39  

Page 46: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

APPEN

DIX    L  Appendix:  Website  

40  

Page 47: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

References  Arline,  K.  (2015,  February  18).  Porter’s  five  forces:  Analyzing  the  compe&&on.  Retrieved  October  

25,  2015  from  businessnewsdaily.com.        About  the  Clothing  and  Clothing  Accessories  Stores  subsector.  (2015,  November  1).  Retrieved  

October  28,  2015,  from  bls.gov    AcVvewear  Growth  Sets  Pace  For  Overall  Apparel  Market.  (2014,  September  3).  Retrieved  October  

30,  2015,  from  npd.com    Apparel  Retail  Industry  Profile:  United  States.  (2015).  Apparel  Retail  Industry  Profile:  United  States,  

1-­‐39.    Barnes  Reports.  (2012).  Women’s  and  Girls’  Apparel  Mfg.  Industry.  Retrieved  October                                  14,  2015  from  Business  Source  Complete  database.    Cox,  M.  (2015).  Ac&vewear  growth  sets  pace  for  overall  apparel  market.  Retrieved  from  npd.com.      EuroMonitor,  (2012).  “5  Key  Facts  for  Apparel  Retailing”  Passport.  Retrieved  from:  Passport  

Database      EuroMonitor,  (2012).  “Apparel  Routes  to  Market:  Part  One  –  Global  DistribuVon  Overview”  

Passport.  Retrieved  from:  Passport  Databse      Flanagan,  J.  (2014,  July  17).  Virtual  reality  and  retail:  Fashion’s  ecommerce  trends.  Retrieved  from  

huffingtonpost.com.    First  Research.  Spor&ng  Goods  Stores.  (31  August  2015).  Retrieved  October  26  from  First  Research  

database.      First  Research.  (2015,  September  28).  Apparel  Accessories  Manufacturing.  Retrieved  October  14,  

2015  from  First  Research  database.      First  Research.  (2015,  August  24).  Women’s  Clothing  Manufacturing.  Retrieved  October  14,  2014  

from  First  Research  database.    

Global  Briefing.  (2015,  September  18).  “Top  10  Apparel  and  Footwear  Markets:  Growth  Strategies                                                      When  the  Good  Times  Stall”  Retrieved  from  Passport  database.    Grewal,  Dhruv  &  Levy.  MarkeVng.  EdiVon:  5th.  Publisher:  McGraw  Hill  Irwin.  2015      Haider,  Zeeshan,  (2015).  “Women  &  Children  Apparel  Wholesaling  in  the  US”  IBISWorld.  Retrieved  

from:  IBISWorld  Database      Hoovers.  (2015).  Spor&ng  Goods  Stores.  Retrieved  October  30,  2015  from  Hoovers  database.      Hoovers.  (2015).  Spor&ng  Goods  Manufacturing.  Retrieved  October  14,  2015  from  Hoovers  

Company  Profile  database.      Hoovers.  (2015).  Clothing  Stores.  Retrieved  October  15,  2015  from  Hoovers  Company  Profile  

database.      

REFERN

ECES    

41  

Page 48: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

References  Kell,  J.  (2014,  December  25).  Athle&c  apparel:  Outperforming  the  compe&&on  in  2014.  Retrieved  

from  Fortune.com    Lipson,  Allison,  (2014).  “Men’s  and  Women’s  Footwear”  Mintel  Academic.  Retrieved  from:  Mintel  

Database      Lockwood,  L.  (2014,  December  19).  The  growth  of  ac&vewear.  Retrieved  from  wwd.com.    Marketline.  (2015,  May).  Global  apparel  retail.  Retrieved  from  business  source  complete  database.        Mergent,  (2015).  “Apparel  Manufacturing”  First  research.  Retrieved  from:  First  Research  Database      Mergent,  (2015).  “Department  Stores”  First  Research.    Retrieved  from:  First  Research  Database      Mintel  Academic.  (2014,  October).  “Fitness  Clothing  -­‐  US”.  The  Market  and  Market  Drivers.  

Retrieved  from  Mintel  Academic  databse.    Mintel.  (2015,  August).  Marke&ng  to  Sports  Fans  –  US.  Retrieved  October  15,  2015  from  Mintel  

Academic  database.    Neville,  Antal,  (2015).  “Clothing  BouVques  in  the  US”  IBISWorld.  Retrieved  from:  IBISWorld  

Database      Noyes,  K.  (2014,  September  22).  What’s  on  trend  for  this  season  for  the  fashion  industry?  Big  data.  

Retrieved  from  fortune.com.    Passport.  (19  May  2015).  Apparel  and  Footwear  in  2015:  Trends,  Developments  and  Prospects.  

Retrieved  October  26,  2015  from  Passport  database.      Retail  Sales  Worldwide  Will  Top  $22  Trillion  This  Year  -­‐  eMarketer.  (2014,    December  23).  

Retrieved  October  30,  2015,  from  emarketer.com    Smith,  Diana,  (2015).  “Retailers  Use  Designer  CollaboraVons  and  Bloggers  to  Promote  Fitness  

Clothing  Lines”  Mintel  Academic.  Retrieved  from:  Mintel  Database      Sherman,  L.  (2015,  March  30).  Is  the  ac&vewear  market  oversaturated?  Retrieved  from  

fashionista.com.    Sherman,  Lauren.  (2015,  March  30).  IS  THE  ACTIVEWEAR  MARKET  OVERSATURATED?  Retrieved  

October  28,  2015,  from  fashionata.com    Specialty  Apparel  Companies.  (2009).  Wall  Street  Transcript,  183(11),  1-­‐10.                                Retrieved  from  Business  Source  Complete  database.    State  Minimum  Wages  |  2015  Minimum  Wage  by  State.  (2015,  June  30).  Retrieved  October  29,  

2015,  from  ncls.org    StaVsta.  (2014).  Apparel  Market  in  the  U.S.  Retrieved  October  17,  2015  from  StaVsta                                  database.          

REFEREN

CES    

42  

Page 49: To: OFT - Weebly · copelandassociates@ohiouniversity:integratedbusinesscluster prepared&for:& & professorbrandt&conner professorsiamak&javadi& professorcatherine&penrod&

REFEREN

CES    References    

Tamminga,  Neely,  (2009).  “Women’s  Apparel  and  Accessories”  Business  Source  Complete.  Retrieved  from:  Business  Source  Complete  Database  

 Tamminga,  Neely,  (2006).  “Specialty  Apparel  Retailers”  Business  Source  Complete.    Retrieved  

from:  Business  Source  Complete  Database      Wagner,  Nancy.  (n.d.).  Analysis  of  the  Retail  Apparel  Industry.  Retrieved  October  29,  2015,  

from  smallbusiness.chron.com      

43