Day Four. Friday, 28 November 2014: Censoring the census results

The provisional census data which came out on 30 August had nothing to say about the “135” national racesof the country. In fact, Minister U Khin Yi, who is responsible for the March-April census, had clarified thefigure was “just for quoting,” according to a seminar participant, who is involved in the monitoring of theofficial head count.

To Hopeland and Back (X) – Day 4 – 2Dec 12, 2014Opinions

It was deliberately left out because it entails a lot of controversies, he says, such as:•    Some disagree being in the same grouping (For instance, Dawei in Burmese group: If we are in Burmesegroup, so should Arakanese.)•    Some national races find themselves in more than a grouping (For instance, Kebar is in both Karen andKayah groups)•    Some national races are named differently as separate national races (For instance, Shan,  Shan Gyi andTailong, which are synonymous)•    Some sub- families of the same national race may also want to be separately registered (For instance,Zomi from Chin, and Burmese speaking Shan Ni from Shan)•    Some are originally from one race but registered as another (“Even U Myint Kying, a census official,admits he is Mon but registered as Burmese”)•    Designating people who wish to be known as Rohingya as “Bengali” may be technically in error, as oneremarks, because it belongs to people in West Bengal of India, though they may be from the same linguisticgroup like Shans, Thais and Laos are “The current mess is the outcome of the top-down planning without consulting those concerned,” heconcludes.

The government has announced that the full report will be released in May 2015. A participant also speaksof the government’s plan to hold a conference to clarify the “135” national races “jumble”. No one seems tobe sure whether it will be in May  or before that.

Another participant’s suggestion is that waiting for Naypyitaw to clear the mess will not spell the end of theproblem. “We must initiate a pre-emptive conference of our own to make sure what the government does isall in order,” he counsels.

The seminar ends with recommendations from the participants. One is to form an Assembly of Civil Society,as during the 1986-96 Guatemalan peace process, to assist in the consensus building, social cohesion; tooffer relevant proposals to both sides; to facilitate dialogues; to monitor the process and assist in protectivemeasures. “For the peace process to reach the point of no return, I believe the participation of the people isa must,” says one.

To mark the event, a dinner party was thrown at the House of Memories, where Gen Aung San used to havehis office.

N.BIf the reader thinks the journal doesn’t do justice to the seminar, please look out for the full report from TNIwhich should be coming out soon.

A modest review of the no­longer modernreview2 comments • 3 months ago

Sai — Test comment!

ALL­INCLUSIVENESS IN AN ETHNICCONTEXT2 comments • a month ago

Roland Watson — Paul, How much does Harnpay you to write this tripe?

What comes after NCA is signed1 comment • a month ago

Roland Watson — Who is the author of theseunsigned editorials? They always support theidea that the EAOs should just sign the …

CEASEFIRE TALKS: Would Min AungHlaing’s professed military supremacy …1 comment • 2 months ago

Roland Watson — Is it really lose­loseoutcome? The regime is not losing. It is doingexactly what it wants. The ceasefire …

ALSO ON SHAN HERALD AGENCY FOR NEWS | ENGLISH

0 Comments Shan Herald Agency for News | English  Login1

 Share⤤ Sort by Best

Start the discussion…

Be the first to comment.

WHAT'S THIS?

Subscribe✉ Add Disqus to your sited Privacyὑ�

 Recommend

Copyright © Shan Herald Agency for News. All Rights Reserved.