to compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately understand own strengths and...

21
To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses Formulate arguments and counter arguments To consider alternatives, walk- away times Planning for Negotiation

Upload: gavin-webster

Post on 16-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

• To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately

• Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses– Formulate arguments and counter arguments

• To consider alternatives, walk-away times

Planning for Negotiation

Page 2: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

• Research shows that planning– Explored wider range of options–Worked harder to find common ground– Spent more time on long term consequences– Set a range of settlements

Why Planning?

Page 3: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Goals Strategy PlanningProcess

UnderstandingStages & Phases

Unpacking the process of planning

Page 4: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Goals

Specific, focused, realistic targets

Linked to other party’s goals (defines issue to settle)

Have limits

MeasurableCommunicating w/other party

Understanding other party

Comparing w/outcome

Definition of Goals

Page 5: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

• Substantive Goals

• Intangible Goals– E.g., reputation, winning, establishing

relationship etc

• Procedural Goals– Setting a precedent

Types of Goals

Page 6: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

• Wishes – unrealistic

• Interests– Reasons for goals

• Positions– Opening bid/target point

What are not goals?

Page 7: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

• What is the goal?– In the movie, Travolta character, Washington

character– In the case, • the job applicant…• the manager

Applying Definition of Goal

Page 8: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Goals Strategy PlanningProcess

UnderstandingStages & Phases

What is the Strategy

•Plan to accomplish goal•action sequences

Page 9: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

• Tactics– Short-term, dynamic– Specific behaviors • types of questions used, listening behaviors,

brainstorming options for mutual gain

• Strategy– have a future long term relationship with the

other party – guide tactics -

Strategy vs. Tactics

Page 10: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Substantive outcome of negotiation important?

Yes No

Relationship with other party important?

Yes Collaboration Accommodation

No Competition Avoidance

A Model to Understand Strategy

Page 11: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

• Avoidance– Depends on how strong or weak the

alternatives are – • too strong, more efficient to avoid negotiation• Too weak, outcome may be too poor and

negotiator will feel obligated

• E.g., tenant

Types of Strategies:Non-engagement

Page 12: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Goals Strategy

UnderstandingStages & Phases

Preparation

Relationship Building

Information Gathering

Information Using

Bidding

Closing the deal

Implementing the agreement

Planning Process

Page 13: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Understanding Phases of Negotiation

Preparation

Relationship Building

Information Gathering

Information Using

Bidding

Closing the deal

Implementing the agreement

*Decide what is important

*Define goals

*Plan how to work w/other party

*Getting to know other party

*Identify similarities & differences^^

*Build commitment to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes

Make case for preferred outcomes to maximize own needs

*About things pertaining to own issues

*About Other party and their needs

*Feasibility of possible agreement

*Consequences of non-agreement

Initial, ideal position actual outcome

Commit to agreement made in ‘bidding phase’

*Decide who needs to do what after agreement

*Identify flaws and omitted issues

*If situation changed, deal with new questions that arise

Page 14: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

StrategyPlanningProcess

Define Issues

Assemble Issues, Define Mix

Define Interests

Identify Limits & alternatives

Set targets

Assess Social Context of Negotiation

Analyze other party

Goals

UnderstandingStages & Phases

Present issues to other party

Protocol of Negotiation

Page 15: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Assemble Issues Define Mix

‘Valuate’ issues

Connections b/w issues

Identify Limits & Alternatives

Set targets

BATNA (define whether negotiated agreement is better than another possibility)

*Target point

*Specific, difficult but achievable, verifiable*Positive Thinking*Different ways of packaging issues*Trade-offs and Throwaways

Resistance point

*Opening Bid

*Range

Define Issues*Single, multiple, single multiple

*Identify previous experience in similar negotiations

*Research to gather info, consult with experts in area of issues

Define Interests Articulate the ‘why’ for issues

Substantive, process related, relationship based (select a strategy)

Assess social context of negotiation

Page 16: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Assess social contextOf negotiation

*Constituents

*Number of negotiators

Set targets

Analyze other party

Current Resources, Interests, NeedsObjectivesReputation/StyleOther’s BATNAOther’s AuthorityOther’s Strategy & Tactics

*Social Rules etc

Present issues to other party

*Supporting validated facts with argument*Refuting arguments of other party with counter arguments

Protocol of negotiation

AgendaLocationDurationThings to do if non agreementRecord of issues agreed uponMethod of evaluating quality of agreement

Page 17: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

End here

Page 18: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses

Assemble Issues Define Mix

‘Valuate’ issues

Connections b/w issues

Assess social contextOf negotiation

*Constituents

*Number of negotiators

Identify Limits & Alternatives

Set targets

Analyze other party

BATNA (define whether negotiated agreement is better than another possibility)

*Target point

*Specific, difficult but achievable, verifiable*Positive Thinking*Different ways of packaging issues*Trade-offs and Throwaways

Current Resources, Interests, NeedsObjectivesReputation/StyleOther’s BATNAOther’s AuthorityOther’s Strategy & Tactics

Resistance point

*Opening Bid

*Range

Define Issues*Single, multiple, single multiple

*Identify previous experience in similar negotiations

*Research to gather info, consult with experts in area of issues

Define InterestsArticulate the ‘why’ for issues

Substantive, process related, relationship based (select a strategy)

*Social Rules etc

Present issues to other party

*Supporting validated facts with argument*Refuting arguments of other party with counter arguments

Page 19: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses
Page 20: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses
Page 21: To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses