tmp scorecardv2 116056284
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Tmp ScoreCardV2 116056284
1/2
-
7/27/2019 Tmp ScoreCardV2 116056284
2/2
NASSCOM Assessment of Competence - Technology (NAC-Tech) is the skills & competency assessment program for entry-level
employment opportunities in the IT/ Engineering sector
Part A
Skill Definition & Candidate Score Analysis
Verbal Ability Overall Score
Grammar: Assessment of English usage building block through evaluation of Grammar. Topics that
were assessed are Nouns, Pronouns, Articles, Tenses, Verbs, Adverbs, Adjectives, Prepositions,
Conjunctions, Subject-Verb Agreement, Modifiers.
44%, your score is within Q2 (26%-50%): Your Grammar skills are below average and your scores
indicate that you need to put in significant effort in improving your Grammar. This would enhance your
overall ability to communicate in English. We suggest that you work on improving your reading habits.
Vocabulary: Assessment of English usage building block by evaluation of vocabulary. Topics that were
assessed are word power and contextual relationships between words.
25%, your score is within Q1 (0%-25%): Your score indicates that you need to put a lot of effort in
improving your vocabulary. Building strong word power and usage of appropriate words aid in long term
success. We suggest that you converse more in English, read good books and use the dictionary more
often.
Spelling & Punctuation: Assessment of English usage building block by evaluation of spellings and
punctuation. These aid in construction of error free and meaningful sentences. Topics that are assessed
are commas, colons, exclamations, apostrophes', common spelling errors, etc.
38%, your score is within Q2 (26%-50%): Your spellings and punctuations need improvement.Besides referring to a grammar book for punctuations, we suggest that you write short essays/stories
and get them evaluated by an English language expert.
Verbal Reasoning: Assessment of English Usage by evaluation of skills like structure, arguments and
verbal reasoning. Topics that are assessed are analogies, paragraph structuring, critical reasoning,
arguments, assumptions and conclusions.
47%, your score is within Q2 (26%-50%): Your verbal reasoning scores are below average. You
need to work more on understanding the finer nuances of the English language. We suggest that while
reading, spend more time understanding the play of words and construct of sentences.
Reading Comprehension Assessment of comprehension of English passages and ability to make inferences from a large amount
of information. Assessment of being able to connect the dots and make conclusions based on
information and ideas spread across the passage.
0%, your score is within Q1 (0%-25%): Your reading comprehension needs significant
improvement. The critical step is to enhance the quantum of your reading habits. Also work towards
improving the quality of reading material.
Analytical Ability,
Logical Reasoning
Assessment of problem solving skills through questions on quantitative aptitude and assessment of logical
reasoning by evaluating skills like Deduction, Induction and Visualization.
43%, your score is within Q2 (26%-50%): Your quantitative and reasoning ability scores are below
average. We suggest that you spend more time on structuring data to obtain information and work on
your fundamentals of quantitative aptitude.
Attention to Detail Assessment of skills that require an eye-for-details.
27%, your score is within Q2 (26%-50%): Your score for eye-for-details is below average. To
improve this ability, we suggest that you slow down your pace of work and focus more on accuracy.
Part B
Technical Skills Assessment of technical skills acquired as part of engineering education. Topics that were assessed
form the fundamentals in the chosen area of specialization.
45%, your score is within Q2 (26%-50%): Your scores indicate that your technical ability needs
improvement. We suggest that you evaluate your strong and weak areas within your specialisation and
revisit all key concepts in weaker areas.