tlti feititranslation of existing classification – annex ... · tlti feititranslation of existing...

12
LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY AND METEOROLOGY CENTRE T l ti fE i ti T l ti fE i ti Translation of Existing Translation of Existing Classification Classification Annex VII, Annex VII, Classification Classification Annex VII, Annex VII, CLP Guidance Document CLP Guidance Document Arnis Ludborzs M Sc Arnis Ludborzs M Sc Arnis Ludborzs, M.Sc. Arnis Ludborzs, M.Sc. Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre (LEGMC) Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre (LEGMC) Environment and Subsoil Department Environment and Subsoil Department E i t lRi k Di i i E i t lRi k Di i i © LEGMC, 2009 Environmental Risks Division Environmental Risks Division [email protected] [email protected]

Upload: hoangkhanh

Post on 25-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

T l ti f E i tiT l ti f E i tiTranslation of ExistingTranslation of ExistingClassificationClassification –– Annex VII,Annex VII,Classification Classification Annex VII,Annex VII,CLP Guidance DocumentCLP Guidance Document

Arnis Ludborzs M ScArnis Ludborzs M ScArnis Ludborzs, M.Sc.Arnis Ludborzs, M.Sc.Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre (LEGMC)Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre (LEGMC)Environment and Subsoil DepartmentEnvironment and Subsoil DepartmentE i t l Ri k Di i iE i t l Ri k Di i i

© LEGMC, 2009

Environmental Risks DivisionEnvironmental Risks [email protected]@lvgmc.lv

Republic of Latvia:Republic of Latvia:LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

ppsome factssome facts

T t l 64 589 kT t l 64 589 k 22Total area: 64,589 kmTotal area: 64,589 km22

Population: ca. 2.3 millionPopulation: ca. 2.3 million

Capital: Riga city (0 8 million)Capital: Riga city (0 8 million)Capital: Riga city (0.8 million)Capital: Riga city (0.8 million)

Population density: 36 per kmPopulation density: 36 per km22

Republic established:Republic established:

November 18, 1918November 18, 1918

Part of the USSR:Part of the USSR:

June 17 1940June 17 1940 –– May 4 1990May 4 1990June 17, 1940 June 17, 1940 May 4, 1990May 4, 1990

Membership:Membership:

© LEGMC, 2009

European Union, NATO, United Nations, European Union, NATO, United Nations, Council of Europe, World Trade Organisation, Council of Europe, World Trade Organisation, Organisation for Security and CoOrganisation for Security and Co--operation in operation in

Europe, Council of the Baltic Sea States, etc.Europe, Council of the Baltic Sea States, etc.

LEGMCLEGMCE i t l Ri k Di i iE i t l Ri k Di i iLATVIAN

ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

Environmental Risks DivisionEnvironmental Risks Division

J 2000 t bli h d Di i i f Ch i lJ 2000 t bli h d Di i i f Ch i l<> January 2000: established as Division of Chemicals <> January 2000: established as Division of Chemicals Control at the Latvian Environment Data Centre (LEDC)Control at the Latvian Environment Data Centre (LEDC)

<> October 2000: LEDC re<> October 2000: LEDC re--organised by joining organised by joining g y j gg y j gEnvironment Consultancy and Monitoring Centre; Division Environment Consultancy and Monitoring Centre; Division of Chemicals Register at the newly established Latvian of Chemicals Register at the newly established Latvian Environment Agency (LEA)Environment Agency (LEA)

<> January 2005: LEA re<> January 2005: LEA re--organised by merging with the organised by merging with the Latvian Hydrometeorological Agency and the State Latvian Hydrometeorological Agency and the State Geological Survey; Chemicals Department at the LatvianGeological Survey; Chemicals Department at the LatvianGeological Survey; Chemicals Department at the Latvian Geological Survey; Chemicals Department at the Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Agency (LEGMA)Environment, Geology and Meteorology Agency (LEGMA)

<> August 2009: State Agency LEGMA reorganised to <> August 2009: State Agency LEGMA reorganised to St t E t i “L t i E i t G l dSt t E t i “L t i E i t G l dState Enterprise “Latvian Environment, Geology and State Enterprise “Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre” Ltd. (LEGMC)Meteorology Centre” Ltd. (LEGMC)

<> Currently 6 (9) employees, competence covers wide <> Currently 6 (9) employees, competence covers wide

© LEGMC, 2009

y ( ) p y , py ( ) p y , prange of EU Chemicals Legislation and waste data range of EU Chemicals Legislation and waste data accountingaccounting

Annex VII: Annex VII: LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

How it was doneHow it was done (1)(1)??R28 Very toxic if swallowedR28 Very toxic if swallowedAcute toxicity results:Acute toxicity results:-- LD50 oral, rat ≤ 25 mg/kg,LD50 oral, rat ≤ 25 mg/kg,-- less than 100 % survival at 5 mg/kg oral rat by theless than 100 % survival at 5 mg/kg oral rat by the

Acute OralAcute Oral ToxicityToxicity(mg/kg bodyweight)(mg/kg bodyweight)

00 << CategoryCategory 11 ≤≤ 55 00,,55less than 100 % survival at 5 mg/kg oral, rat by the less than 100 % survival at 5 mg/kg oral, rat by the

fixed dose procedure, orfixed dose procedure, or-- high mortality at doses high mortality at doses ≤≤ 25 mg/kg oral, rat, by the 25 mg/kg oral, rat, by the acute toxic class method (for test result interpretation acute toxic class method (for test result interpretation

55 << CategoryCategory 22 ≤≤ 5050 55

5050 << CategoryCategory 33 ≤≤ 300300 100100see flow charts in Appendix 2 to test method B.1 ter of see flow charts in Appendix 2 to test method B.1 ter of Annex V).Annex V). 300300 << CategoryCategory 44 ≤≤ 22,,000000 500500

T+; R28T+; R28 Acute Tox. 2Acute Tox. 2 H300H300 (1)(1)

Note (1):Note (1):

© LEGMC, 2009

Note (1):Note (1):For these classes it is possible to use the recommended minimum classification as defined in section 1.2.1.1 in Annex VI.For these classes it is possible to use the recommended minimum classification as defined in section 1.2.1.1 in Annex VI.

Data or other information may be available to indicate that reData or other information may be available to indicate that re--classification in a more severe category is appropriate.classification in a more severe category is appropriate.

Annex VII: Annex VII: LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

How it was doneHow it was done (2)(2)??R34 Causes burnsR34 Causes burns H314: Causes severe skin burnsH314: Causes severe skin burnsR34 Causes burnsR34 Causes burns-- if, when applied to healthy intact animal skin, full if, when applied to healthy intact animal skin, full thickness destruction of skin tissue occurs as athickness destruction of skin tissue occurs as aresult of up to four hours exposure, or if this result can result of up to four hours exposure, or if this result can

H314: Causes severe skin burnsH314: Causes severe skin burnsand eye damageand eye damage

Corrosive in > 1 of 3 animalsCorrosive in > 1 of 3 animalsp pp pbe predicted,be predicted,-- organic hydroperoxides, except where evidence to the organic hydroperoxides, except where evidence to the contrary is available.contrary is available.

1A1A ≤ 3 min≤ 3 min for ≤ 1 hfor ≤ 1 h1B1B > 3 min > 3 min -- ≤ 1 h≤ 1 h for ≤ 14 dfor ≤ 14 d1C1C > 1 h > 1 h -- ≤ 4 hours≤ 4 hours for ≤ 14 dfor ≤ 14 d

Notes:Notes:Where classification is based on results of a validated in vitro test R35 or Where classification is based on results of a validated in vitro test R35 or R34 should be applied according toR34 should be applied according tothe capacity of the test method to discriminate between thesethe capacity of the test method to discriminate between thesethe capacity of the test method to discriminate between these.the capacity of the test method to discriminate between these.Where classification is based upon consideration of extreme pH alone, R35 Where classification is based upon consideration of extreme pH alone, R35 should be applied.should be applied.

C; R34C; R34 Skin Corr 1BSkin Corr 1B H314H314 (2)(2)C; R34C; R34 Skin Corr. 1BSkin Corr. 1B H314H314 (2)(2)

Note (Note (22):):It is recommended to classify in Category 1B even if it also could be possible that 1C could be applicable for certain cases.It is recommended to classify in Category 1B even if it also could be possible that 1C could be applicable for certain cases.

Going back toGoing back to original data, may not result in a possibility to distinguish between Category 1B or 1C, since the exposure periodoriginal data, may not result in a possibility to distinguish between Category 1B or 1C, since the exposure period( C) /( C) /

© LEGMC, 2009

has normally been up tohas normally been up to 4 hours according to Regulation (EC) No 440/2008.4 hours according to Regulation (EC) No 440/2008.However, for the future, when data are derived from tests following a sequential approachHowever, for the future, when data are derived from tests following a sequential approach aas foreseen ins foreseen in

the Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, Category 1C should be considered.the Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, Category 1C should be considered.

Annex VII: Annex VII: LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

How it was doneHow it was done (4)(4)??R50 Very toxic to aquatic organismsR50 Very toxic to aquatic organisms andand Acute (shortAcute (short term) aquatic hazardterm) aquatic hazardR50 Very toxic to aquatic organismsR50 Very toxic to aquatic organisms, and, andR53 May cause longR53 May cause long--term adverse effects in the term adverse effects in the aquatic environmentaquatic environmentAcute toxicity:Acute toxicity:

Acute (shortAcute (short--term) aquatic hazardterm) aquatic hazardAcute Category 1Acute Category 1

96 h LC96 h LC5050 (for fish) ≤ 1 mg/l and/or(for fish) ≤ 1 mg/l and/or48 h EC48 h EC5050 (for crustacea) ≤ 1 mg/l and/or(for crustacea) ≤ 1 mg/l and/oryy

96 h LC96 h LC5050 (for fish) (for fish) ≤≤ 1 mg/l1 mg/lor or 48 h EC48 h EC5050 (for daphnia) (for daphnia) ≤≤ 1 mg/l1 mg/loror 72 h IC72 h IC5050 (for algae) (for algae) ≤ 1 mg/l≤ 1 mg/land Chronic toxicity:and Chronic toxicity:

5050 ( ) g( ) g72 or 96 h ErC72 or 96 h ErC5050 (for algae or other aquatic (for algae or other aquatic

plants) ≤ 1 mg/l.plants) ≤ 1 mg/l.Chronic (longChronic (long--term) aquatic hazardterm) aquatic hazard

Chronic Category 1Chronic Category 1and Chronic toxicity:and Chronic toxicity:-- the substance is not readily degradable, orthe substance is not readily degradable, or-- the log Pthe log Powow (log octanol/water partition coefficient) (log octanol/water partition coefficient) ≥≥3,0 (unless the experimentally determined BCF3,0 (unless the experimentally determined BCF

Chronic Category 1Chronic Category 196 h LC96 h LC5050 (for fish)(for fish) ≤ 1 mg/l and/or≤ 1 mg/l and/or

48 h EC48 h EC5050 (for crustacea)(for crustacea) ≤ 1 mg/l and/or≤ 1 mg/l and/or72 or 96 h ErC72 or 96 h ErC5050 (for algae or other aquatic(for algae or other aquatic

≤≤ 100).100).5050

plants)plants) ≤ 1 mg/l≤ 1 mg/land the substance is not rapidly degradable and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF and/or the experimentally determined BCF

≥ 500 (or if≥ 500 (or if≥ 500 (or, if≥ 500 (or, ifabsent, the log Kabsent, the log Kowow ≥ 4).≥ 4).

N; R50N; R50--5353 Aquatic Acute 1Aquatic Acute 1 H400H400

© LEGMC, 2009

;; qq

Aquatic Chronic 1Aquatic Chronic 1 H410H410

Auto translation...Auto translation...LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

ProizvodnjaProizvodnja ii uporabauporaba kemikalijakemikalija jeje odod temeljnetemeljnevažnostivažnosti zaza svesve ekonomijeekonomije uu cijelomcijelom svijetusvijetu..Međutim,Međutim, takođertakođer jeje priznalapriznala dada sese kemikalijekemikalijepredstavljajupredstavljaju rizikerizike kojikoji bibi trebalitrebali bitibiti označenioznačeni uucijelomcijelom lanculancu opskrbeopskrbe MnogeMnoge zemljezemlje razvilerazvile susu

TheThe productionproduction andand useuse ofof chemicalschemicals isis fundamentalfundamentaltoto allall economieseconomies allall overover thethe worldworld.. However,However, ititisis alsoalso recognisedrecognised thatthat chemicalschemicals posepose risksrisksthatthat shouldshould bebe indicatedindicated throughoutthroughout thethe supplysupplychainchain ManyMany countriescountries havehave developeddeveloped systemssystemscijelomcijelom lanculancu opskrbeopskrbe.. MnogeMnoge zemljezemlje razvilerazvile susu

sustavesustave zaza pružanjepružanje informacijainformacija oo opasnimopasnimsvojstvimasvojstvima ii kontrolekontrole mjeramjera kemikalijakemikalija čijičiji jeje ciljciljosiguravanjeosiguravanje njihovenjihove sigurnesigurne proizvodnju,proizvodnju,promet,promet, korištenjekorištenje ii odlaganjeodlaganje.. Ipak,Ipak, tihtih sustavasustavatrenutnotrenutno nisunisu uvijekuvijek uu skladuskladu ss jednijedni nana drugedruge ii

chainchain.. ManyMany countriescountries havehave developeddeveloped systemssystemsforfor providingproviding informationinformation onon hazardoushazardouspropertiesproperties andand controlcontrol measuresmeasures ofof chemicalschemicalsaimedaimed atat ensuringensuring theirtheir safesafe production,production,transport,transport, useuse andand disposaldisposal.. Yet,Yet, thosethose systemssystemsareare currentlycurrently notnot alwaysalways compatiblecompatible withwith eacheachtrenutnotrenutno nisunisu uvijekuvijek uu skladuskladu ss jednijedni nana drugedruge ii

čestočesto zahtijevajuzahtijevaju višestrukevišestruke natpisenatpise iiSigurnosnoSigurnosno tehničkitehnički listovilistovi zaza istiisti proizvodproizvod..

ZbogZbog toga,toga, kompanijekompanije uključeneuključene uu međunarodnojmeđunarodnoj

areare currentlycurrently notnot alwaysalways compatiblecompatible withwith eacheachotherother andand oftenoften requirerequire multiplemultiple labelslabels andandSafetySafety DataData SheetsSheets forfor thethe samesame productproduct..

Consequently,Consequently, companiescompanies involvedinvolved inin internationalinternationalgg g ,g , p jp j jj jjtrgovinitrgovini morajumoraju slijeditislijediti viševiše propisapropisa uu veziveziopasnostiopasnosti klasifikacijaklasifikacija ii označavanjeoznačavanje ovisnoovisno ootometome gdjegdje imim jeje činitičiniti ii poslovniposlovni korisnicikorisnici svibanjsvibanjvidjetividjeti nedosljednenedosljedne oznakeoznake upozorenjaupozorenja iiSigurnosnoSigurnosno tehničkitehnički listovilistovi zaza istuistu kemikalijukemikaliju..

q y,q y, pptradetrade needneed toto followfollow multiplemultiple regulationsregulationsregardingregarding hazardhazard classificationclassification andand labellinglabellingdependingdepending onon wherewhere theythey dodo businessbusiness andandusersusers maymay seesee inconsistentinconsistent labellabel warningswarnings andandSafetySafety DataData SheetsSheets forfor thethe samesame chemicalchemical.. TheThegg jj

PostojećiPostojeći sustavsustav jeje istoisto takotako dugodugo trajatitrajati ii možemožedovestidovesti dodo preprekaprepreka zaza međunarodnumeđunarodnu trgovinutrgovinunana kemikalijekemikalije..

yycurrentcurrent systemsystem isis alsoalso timetime--consumingconsuming andand cancanresultresult inin barriersbarriers toto internationalinternational tradetrade ininchemicalschemicals..

© LEGMC, 2009

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (1)(1)LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (1)(1)

ECHA’ I t d t G id th CLPECHA’ I t d t G id th CLP•• ECHA’s Introductory Guidance on the CLP ECHA’s Introductory Guidance on the CLP Regulation (ECHARegulation (ECHA--0909--GG——0101--EN), issued on EN), issued on 25 August 200925 August 2009

•• Content:Content:–– Getting startedGetting started

•• IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction•• Roles and obligations under CLPRoles and obligations under CLP•• Preparing for CLPPreparing for CLPp gp g•• Transition to CLPTransition to CLP•• Similarities and differences to DSD / DPDSimilarities and differences to DSD / DPD

© LEGMC, 2009

•• DSD / DPD and CLP DSD / DPD and CLP -- key terms comparedkey terms compared

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (2)(2)LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (2)(2)

C t t ( td )C t t ( td )•• Content (contd.):Content (contd.):–– Hazard classificationHazard classification

G l f t f l ifi tiG l f t f l ifi ti•• General features of classificationGeneral features of classification•• Using harmonised classificationsUsing harmonised classifications•• Using the translation tablesUsing the translation tablesgg•• Sources of informationSources of information•• The role of testing in CLPThe role of testing in CLP•• Classifying substancesClassifying substances•• Classifying substancesClassifying substances•• Classifying mixturesClassifying mixtures

–– Hazard communicationHazard communication•• LabellingLabelling•• Applying the precedence rules for labellingApplying the precedence rules for labelling

Specific labelling and packaging solutionsSpecific labelling and packaging solutions

© LEGMC, 2009

•• Specific labelling and packaging solutionsSpecific labelling and packaging solutions•• Safety Data SheetsSafety Data Sheets

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (3)(3)LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (3)(3)

C t t ( td )C t t ( td )•• Content (contd.):Content (contd.):–– FollowFollow--up to classificationup to classification

Th l ifi ti d l b lli i tTh l ifi ti d l b lli i t tif i b ttif i b t•• The classification and labelling inventory The classification and labelling inventory –– notifying substancesnotifying substances•• New hazard informationNew hazard information•• Request for use of an alternative chemical nameRequest for use of an alternative chemical nameqq•• Information records and requestInformation records and request•• Proposals for harmonised classification and labellingProposals for harmonised classification and labelling

REACH and EU downstream legislationREACH and EU downstream legislation–– REACH and EU downstream legislationREACH and EU downstream legislation•• Downstream legislation Downstream legislation –– an overviewan overview•• Biocidal productsBiocidal products and plant protection productsand plant protection productspp p p pp p p•• ClassificationClassification--based obligations under REACHbased obligations under REACH•• Substance Information Exchange Fora (SIEFs)Substance Information Exchange Fora (SIEFs)

REACH guidance documents relevant to CLPREACH guidance documents relevant to CLP

© LEGMC, 2009

•• REACH guidance documents relevant to CLPREACH guidance documents relevant to CLP

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (4)(4)LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

CLP GuidanceCLP Guidance (4)(4)

•• Content (contd.):Content (contd.):–– AnnexesAnnexes

•• Annex 1. Examples from the UN GHS pilot trialsAnnex 1. Examples from the UN GHS pilot trials•• Annex 2. GlossaryAnnex 2. GlossaryAnnex 2. GlossaryAnnex 2. Glossary•• Annex 3. Additional sources of informationAnnex 3. Additional sources of information•• Annex 4 The UN GHS and CLPAnnex 4 The UN GHS and CLPAnnex 4. The UN GHS and CLPAnnex 4. The UN GHS and CLP

© LEGMC, 2009

LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY ANDMETEOROLOGY CENTRE

Thank you for your Thank you for your tt ti !tt ti !attention!attention!

© LEGMC, 2009