title text here weathering the storm - aarp · microsoft powerpoint - ppt0000001.ppt [read-only]...
TRANSCRIPT
Title text here
Weathering the Storm:The Impact of the Great RecessionOn Long Term Services and Supports
Preliminary findings of a 50 state survey presented to the National Home and
Community Based Service ConferenceSeptember 27, 2010
9/27/2010 2
Funded by AARP under direction of the Public Policy Institute
Built on 5 prior NASUAD state surveys
Presenting on preliminary findings
Final report to be released later this Fall
Research Methodology
9/27/2010 3
Primary Findings
9/27/2010 4
BUDGET CONTEXTStates Continue to Struggle through Tough Economy
10/4/2010 5
Recession Remains a Significant Factor
9/27/2010 6
10/4/2010 DRAFT: NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION 7
MI
AK
HI
CA
WI
WA
OR
ID
WY
UT
AZ
NM
NV
TX
MN
IA
MO
OK
NE
KS
SD
NDMT
AL
LA
FL
TN
IN OHIL
PA
WVVA
KY
NC
SC
GA
AR
MS
ME
NY
VTNH
MA
RI
CT
NJ
DE
MDCO
Percent Change in State Tax Revenue2007 (actual) to 2011 (projected)
Personal Income, Corporate, and Sales Taxes
Source: HMA analysis of data from National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO), Spring Fiscal Survey of States, 2007-2011 reports. Notes: 2011 figures are estimates. For Illinois, this map uses projected revenue from NASBO’s 2006 report because 2007 data was not available.
Percent Change
-33.7% to -16%
-14.8% to -10.1%
-9.8% to -5.9%
-4.5% to -.8%
+.1% to 11.5%
AGING AND DISABILITY PROGRAMSImpact of the Recession on non-Medicaid funded LTSS
10/4/2010 8
Source: AARP, HMA, NASUAD Economic Survey, Preliminary Data, FY 10, FY11. FY09 data is from NASUA Economic Survey, December 2009.
9/27/2010 9
CO
Non-Medicaid State Expenditure Cuts FY 2010
DC
Notes: Washington, D.C. (not shown) had a cut of less than 5%.
Expenditure Cut
More than 25%
21-25%
16-20%
11-15%
6-10%
Less than 5%
None
Data not available
9/27/2010 11
10/4/2010 12
End of ARRA Senior Nutrition FundingWill Have Significant Impact
10/4/2010 13
10/4/2010 14
Despite an increase in the number of APS calls , only one state increased funding for APS while the rest either flat-lined or decreased state appropriations.
MEDICAIDImpact of the Recession on Medicaid funded LTSS
10/4/2010 15
Medicaid LTSS Policy Trends
10/4/2010 16
Extended ARRA Enhanced FMAP Phase-DownSome states budgeted for an extension of ARRA with a 6.5%
enhancement to their standard FMAP through June 30, 2011. Congress enacted a phase-down of the enhancement.
10/4/2010 17
Standard FMAP +6.4%
Standard FMAP +3.2%
Standard FMAP +1.2%
Standard FMAPJa
nuar
y 1,
201
1
Apr
il 1,
201
1
July
1, 2
011
U.S. Medicaid Enrollment Increases in Economic Downturns
10/4/2010 18
Aged and Disabled enrollment largely unaffected by economic fluctuations, but….
Enrollment increase in other groups
creates fiscal stress
may prompt states to curtail
LTSS
Enrollment increases likely contribute to LTSS policy decisions
19
U.S. Medicaid Enrollment Increases in Economic Downturns: FY 1992- FY 2010
SOURCE: For 1998-2008: Medicaid Enrollment in 50 States: June 2008 Data Update, KCMU, August 2009. FY 2009 and FY 2010 based on KCMU survey of Medicaid officials in 50 states and DC conducted by Health Management Associates, 2009. 1992-1997 data are from CMS for federal fiscal years. 1998-2010 are June-June state fiscal years.
Annual growth rate:
20
Total Medicaid Spending Growth, 1996-2010
6.8%
10.4%
5.7%
3.4%
8.7%
12.7%
8.5%7.7%
6.4%
1.3%
7.9%
4.1%4.7%
3.8%
6.3%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Strong Economy, Welfare Reform,
Enrollment Drops, Managed Care
1995-1998
Economic Downturn, Enrollment & Cost Growth,
2000-2003
NOTE: Data for State Fiscal Years, for total Medicaid spending, including state, local and federal funds.
SOURCE: Historic Medicaid Growth Rates from KCMU Analysis of CMS Form 64 Data, FY 2008, 2009 and 2010 based on KCMU survey of Medicaid officials in 50 states and DC conducted by Health Management Associates, 2009.
Low Enrollment Growth & Medicare Part D
2006-2007
Adopted
Economic Downturn 2008-2010
Adopted
8.9% Est.
21
While Total Medicaid Funds Grew During the Recession, State Funding Experienced Negative Growth due to ARRA
FY 2000 - FY 2010
SOURCE: FY 2011 estimated by HMA. 2009 and 2010 from: Vernon Smith, Kathy Gifford, Eileen Ellis, Robin Rudowitz. CarynMarks and Molly O’Malley, “The Crunch Continues: Medicaid Spending, Coverage and Policy in the Midst of a Recession,” The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, September 2009. http://www.kff.org/medicaid/7985.cfm
ARRA Enhanced FMAP
(2009-2010)
Provider reimbursement was the major policy area in which states made changes
10/4/2010 22
States were generally more likely to enhance benefits and increase rates than to implement policy restrictions
Num
ber
of S
tate
s
ARRA and PPACA MOE RequirementsProtected Eligibility Standards
10/4/2010 23
States appear to be committed to holding steady or increasing HCBS benefits
10/4/2010 24
Slightly more states have or plan to increase HCBS benefits than have or plan to decrease benefits
Most Home and Community Based waivers experienced upward trend in number served
10/4/2010 25
Based on states reporting average daily census for at least two years in FYs 09, 10 & 11
Medicaid nursing facility census is expected to decrease or remain static in most states
10/4/2010 26
Few states reported cuts to State Plan Benefits
10/4/2010 27
PCS was most frequent service cut among states that trimmed
2010 provider rate changes - a mix of increases and decreases
10/4/2010 28
States were most likely to change NF rates
Num
ber
of S
tate
s
Fewer rate changes planned for 2011 – with the exception of NF
10/4/2010 29
Num
ber
of S
tate
s
Many states reported plans to develop or expand managed long term care initiatives
10/4/2010 30
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT Impact of the Recession on States Ability to Use HCBS Opportunities in
10/4/2010 31
10/4/2010 32
States Likely to Pursue HCBS Options in Affordable Care Act
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Medical/Health Home-CommunityHealth Teams
Medical/Health Home-SPA
Medical/Health Home-PlanningGrant
Money Follows the Person-NewGrantee
Money Follow the Person -ExistingGrantee
Community First Choice Option
State Balancing Incentive Program
HCB
S O
ptio
ns
Number of States
STATE OUTLOOKWhat to expect in 2011
10/4/2010 33
10/4/2010 34
Frequently Noted Medicaid Priorities
10/4/2010 35
State Outlook
10/4/2010 36
Title text hereFor additional information:
Susan Reinhardwww.aarp.org/ppi
Kathy Giffordwww.healthmanagement.com
Martha Rohertywww.nasuad.org