title: feep feasibility report prepared by: bernd...
TRANSCRIPT
Technical Note HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 1Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Title: FEEP Feasibility Report
Prepared by: Bernd Schuerenberg Date: 25/02/2003
Project Management: Walter Fichter
Distribution: See Distribution List
Copying of this document, and giving it to others and the use or communication of the contents there-of, are forbidden without express authority. Offenders are liable to the payment of damages. All rightsare reserved in the event of the grant of a patent or the registration of a utility model or design.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page A-IIssue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Change Record
Issue Date Sheet Description of Change Release1.02.0
3.0
26/09/0230/01/03
25/02/03
AllAll
-
first draft issue for Progress Meeting # 3chapters 1-5 edited and updated;completion of chapters 6 - 9 (as part B of this report)Re-edited version
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page B-IIssue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 2
1.1 INTRODUCTION 21.2 SCOPE 3
2 DOCUMENTS AND DEFINITIONS 4
2.1 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 42.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 42.2.1 HYPER 42.2.2 SMART-2 42.2.3 GOCE 52.2.4 CS SLIT EMITTER DOCUMENTS 62.2.5 IN NEEDLE EMITTER AND IN CAPILLARY EMITTER DOCUMENTS 62.2.6 COLLOID THRUSTER DOCUMENTS 72.2.7 NEUTRALISERS 72.2.8 OTHER REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 72.3 DEFINITIONS 82.3.1 CENTRE OF MASS AND DRAG-FREE POINT 82.3.2 CO-ORDINATE SYSTEMS 82.4 ACRONYMS 10
3 FEEP PROPULSION SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGIES 13
3.1 INDIUM THRUSTERS 133.1.1 INDIUM NEEDLE EMITTERS 133.1.2 INDIUM MULTI-CAPILLARY EMITTERS 233.2 CAESIUM THRUSTERS 253.3 NEUTRALISERS 29
4 REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRAINTS FOR THE FEEP SYSTEM 31
4.1 FEEP APPLICATION FOR HYPER 314.1.1 FEEP THRUSTER USAGE 314.1.2 DISTURBANCE FORCES AND DISTURBANCE MOMENTS 324.1.3 BASELINED THRUSTER ARRANGEMENT FOR HYPER 334.1.4 HYPER REQUIREMENTS ON FEEP SYSTEM 384.2 SMART-2 REQUIREMENTS 384.2.1 SMART-2 THRUSTER ARRANGEMENT 384.2.2 SMART-2 REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 404.3 GOCE REQUIREMENTS 444.3.1 GOCE THRUSTER ARRANGEMENT 444.3.2 GOCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 45
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page B-IIIssue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
4.4 COMPARISON OF REQUIREMENTS 494.5 CONCLUSIONS 54
5 FEEP TRADE-OFF CRITERIA 55
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 2Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE
1.1 Introduction
HYPER is one of several new scientific missions, which depend on the availability of suitable Micro-NewtonPropulsion Systems.
Micro-Newton Propulsion Systems based on FEEP thruster technologies are characterised by
� commandable thrust levels of high repeatability, starting at levels of approx. 0.1 micro-N
� high resolution / quantisation in the order of 0.1 micro-N
� low thruster noise
� fast response.
The following scientific missions will use and / or depend on the availability of suitable Micro-NewtonPropulsion Systems:
� MICROSCOPE (CNES)
� GOCE (ESA)
� SMART-2 (ESA / NASA)
� HYPER (ESA)
� LISA (ESA / NASA)
� DARWIN (ESA)
Also a number of NASA missions are planned, for which FEEPs will be high-ranking candidates as micro-propulsion systems, such as:
� Earth Science Experimental Mission EX-5
� Laser Interplanetary Ranging Experiment LIRE
� Terrestrial Planet Finder TPF
� Micro-Arcsecond X-Ray Interferometer Mission MAXIM
� Submillimeter Probe of the Evolution of Cosmic Structure SPECS.
In RD [8-01], four alternative micro-propulsion systems were analysed and evaluated for five different futuremissions:
� FEEP thrusters (Cs-Slit and In-Needle)
� Colloid FEEP Thrusters
� Pulsed Plasma Thrusters
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 3Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
� Micro-N Cold Gas Thrusters.
1.2 Scope
HYPER will be equipped with two propulsion systems:
� a small Cold Gas Propulsion System (CGPS) for initial attitude acquisition, for attitude control of HYPERuntil the FEEP system becomes operational, and for attitude re-acquisition in emergency cases,
� a FEEP Micro-Newton Propulsion System for the Science Phase of the mission.
This report addresses the FEEP Micro-Newton Propulsion System.
The study task "FEEP Feasibility" covers the following aspects:
� description of different micro-N thruster technologies based on FEEP technology, taking also intoaccount potential heritage and the expected maturity of technology
� summary of FEEP requirements for HYPER, SMART-2, and GOCE. For the detailed requirementspecification for HYPER see HYP-5-01: "FEEP Requirements Specification for HYPER"
� comparison of requirements and identification of significant differences that may result in technologydrivers
� the definition of trade-off criteria to compare different Micro-Newton Propulsion Systems based on FEEPtechnology.
In addition, a comprehensive list of reference documents is given that may serve as an overview of theavailable documentation.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 4Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
2 Documents and Definitions
2.1 Applicable Documents
The following documents are applicable to the extent outlined in chapter 3.
AD Doc. No. Title
AD-01 HYP-2-05 Performance Requirements Breakdown for the HYPER Satellite
AD-02 HYP-FEEP-RS-SPA-1 FEEP Performance Specification;issue 1, 31 Jan 2002
AD-03 HYP-ESA-SOW-SPA-1 Statement of Work, HYPER Industrial Initial Feasibility Study;issue Draft (B)
AD-04 EHB-003 ROCKOT User's Guide;iss. 3, rev. 1; April 2001
AD-05 HYP-1-01 Orbit Trade-off Report
AD-06 HYP-2-01 Secondary AOCS Design
2.2 Reference Documents
Not all of the following documents are referenced within this note. The list serves as a useful overview ofdocuments about micro-N propulsion systems / technology.
2.2.1 HYPER
RD Doc. No. Title
1-01 HYP-ASU-DD-CST-1 Description of the Atomic Sagnac Unit, Issue 1, 31 January 2002
1-02 CDF-09 Hyper CDF Study Report (as amended by Errata Corrigum refHYP-CDF-E/C-1); Sept 2000
1-03 HYP-ESA-RS-SPA-3 Hyper Payload Requirement Specification, Issue 2, 7 June 2002
2.2.2 SMART-2
RD Doc. No. Title
2-01 SMT2.RP.005.EU.AST SMART-2 System Definition Study Final Report;issue 1, 2002
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 5Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
2-02 SM2-CAS-4100-TNO-003 Micro-Propulsion Trade-off;11 April 2002
2-03 SM2-CAS-5120-TNO-003 Mechanical Design Description;28 June 2002
2-04 MPE/380/DN Development of FEEP Neutralisers (Statement of Work);issue 3, 05 Feb 2001
2-05 SP-00000499-00-01 FEEP PCU Specification (ALTA thrust and RAL neutraliser);issue: 1 draft; 16 Sept 2002
2-06 ALTA/CL/SP-06 Development of Integrated FEEP Cluster Systems:Cluster Assembly Requirements Document;issue: 2; 29 March 2002
2-07 ALTA/LF/EA-01 Low thrust Propulsion System Characterization and Life Testingfor LISA and DARWIN:FEEP Preliminary Dynamic Model;issue 2; 22 May 2002
2-08 Direct communication Outline Drawings of the SMART-2 FEEP Cluster(status Dec. 2002)
2.2.3 GOCE
RD Doc. No. Title
3-01 GO-RQ-ASG-0008 Micro Thruster Assembly (MTA) Requirement Specification;issue 4 Draft, Dec. 2002
3-02 GO-RQ-ASG-0019 GOCE FEEP PCU Requirements Specification
3-03 GO-TN-ASG-0001 FEEP System Design Description,included in GOCE Platform Design Description
3-04 GOCE FEEP Propellant Budget
3-05 GO-TN-ARC-MP-0003 Plume Model,issue Draft, 17 Jan 2002
3-06 GO-MTA-ARCS-TN-001 Preliminary Test Results; Direct Thrust Measurement and ClusterTesting,issue: Draft, 09 July 2001
3-07 GO-DD-SDP-001 MTA Design Definition Report,issue: Draft, 19 June 2001
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 6Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
2.2.4 Cs Slit Emitter Documents
RD Doc. No. Title
4-01 ALTA/LF/EA-01 Low Thrust Propulsion System Characterisation and Life Testingfor LISA and DARWIN -- FEEP Preliminary Dynamic Model;issue2, 22 May 2002
4-02 ALTA/CL/SP-06 Development of Integrated FEEP Cluster Systems (ClusterAssembly Requirements Document);issue 1, 14 Feb 2002
4-03 ALTA/P-06.1/G Micro-Newton Thruster Assembly for the GOCE Platform(Technical Proposal)issue 1, 22 June 2001
4-04 JPP Vol. 14, No. 5,Sept-Oct 1998
M. Marcuccio, A. Genovese, M. Andrenucci:Experimental Performance of Field Emission Microthrusters
2.2.5 In Needle Emitter and In Capillary Emitter Documents
RD Doc. No. Title
5-01 AIAA 2002-3688 A. Genovese, M. Tajmar, N. Buldrini, W. Steiger:Extended Endurance Test of the Indium FEEP Micro-Thruster
5-02 -- M. Thajmar, A. Genovese, W. Steiger:Indium FEEP Microthruster Experimental Characterisation;Journal of Propulsion and Power, submitted 2002
5-03 MPE/404/DN ARCS Indium Liquid Metal Ion Source Characterization TestReportissue 1, 22 Oct 2001
5-04 MAGNA STEYRproposal # 2825
Development and Supply of a Micro-N Thruster Assembly for theGOCE Platform (Technical Proposal);19 June 2001
5-05 ARCS FEEP Infos (1) First 2,000 h Endurance Test of an Indium FEEP CLUSTER15 July 2002
(2) First Extended Endurance Test of an Indium FEEP CLUSTER30 October 2002
(3) 3500 h operation with an Indium FEEP thruster10 January 2003
5-06 AIAA-2002-5718 M. Tajmar, A. Genovese, W. Steiger:Indium-FEEP Microthruster: Experimental Characterisation
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 7Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
5-07 -- Electric Propulsion Plasma Simulations and Influence on S/CChargingAIAA Journal of S/C and Rockets, Vol 39, no. 6 (2002), 886 - 893
5-08 -- Direct Thrust Model Assembly (MAGNA Steyr drawing)
5-09 3rd International Confe-rence of Spacecraft Pro-pulsion, Cannes; 2000
W. Steiger, A. Genovese, M. Tajmar:Micronewton Indium FEEP Thrusters
5-10 AIAA-2002-5718 M. Tajmar, A. Genovese, N. Buldrini, W. Steiger:Miniaturized Indium FEEP Multiemitter Design and Performance
5-11 Applied Physics A 76, 1-4(2002)
M. Tajmar, A. Genovese:Experimental validation of a mass efficiency model for an indium-metal ion source
2.2.6 Colloid Thruster Documents
RD Doc. No. Title
6-01 IEPC-99_014 M. Martinez-Sanchez, J. Fernandez de la Mora; V. Hruby, M.Gamero-Castano, V. Khyms:Research on Colloid Thrusters
6-02 JPL Presentation forSMART-2
Bill Folkner / JPL:DRS Architecture;28 May 2002
2.2.7 Neutralisers
RD Doc. No. Title
7-01 AIAA-2002-4243 M. Tajmar: Survey on FEEP Neutralizer Options;July 2002
7-02 MPE/380/DN Development of FEEP Neutralisers (Statement of Work);ESA, issue 3, 05 Feb 2001
2.2.8 Other Reference Documents
RD Doc. No. Title
8-01 SERC #1-01 J.G. Reichbach, R.J. Sedwick, M. Martinez-Sanchez:Micropropulsion System Selection for Precision Formation FlyingSatellites;Jan 2001
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 8Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
2.3 Definitions
2.3.1 Centre of Mass and Drag-Free Point
According to [AD-01], the Drag-Free Point (DFP) shall lie in the middle of the intersection line of the two ASUplanes, as shown in Figure 2.3-1. Ideally, the spacecraft CoM and the DFP should coincide. In case ofHYPER, the large mass of the Payload Module will not permit such a perfect matching.
The assumptions made with respect to S/C axes and Payload Module orientation are shown in Figure 2.3-1.Further, it is assumed that SC_Y_p points into local zenith direction, and SC_Z_p points into flight directionat Ascending Node. These preliminary assumptions are used in the discussion and calculation of thedisturbance forces and torques in sect 4.1.2.
Figure 2.3-1: Spacecraft Physical Coordinates, Centre-of-Mass (CoM), and Drag-free Point (DFP)(CoM shown in black; DFP shown in red)
2.3.2 Co-ordinate Systems
[A] Spacecraft Physical Co-ordinate System (see Figure 2.3-1):
SC_O_p origin is the centre of the Adaptor Ring plane (= separation plane Launcher / Spacecraft)
SC_X_p perpendicular to the adaptor ring plane; pointing negatively from centre of separation planethrough centre of Solar Array (i.e. parallel to PST_X_f)
SC_Z_p
SC_Y_p
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 9Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
SC_Y_p normal to SC_X_p; (assumption: SC_Y_p = normal of the side panel pointing to local zenithat Ascending Node)
SC_Z_p completes the right hand co-ordinate system(assumption: SC_Z_p = normal of the side panel pointing in flight direction at AscendingNode)
Figure 2.3-2: Spacecraft Functional Coordinates, Centre-of-Mass (CoM), and Drag-free Point (DFP)(CoM shown in black; DFP shown in red)
[B] Spacecraft Co-ordinate System (see Figure 2.3-2):
SC_O_f origin is the centre of the separation plane Launcher / Spacecraft
SC_X_f perpendicular to the adaptor ring plane; pointing negatively from centre of separation plane through centre of Solar Array (parallel to PST_X_f)
SC_Y_f normal to SC_X_f; (assumption: SC_Y_f � nadir pointing at Descending Node)
SC_Z_f completes the right hand co-ordinate system(assumption: SC_Z_f � flight direction at Ascending Node)
SC_Z_fSC_Y_f
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 10Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
[C] FEEP Propulsion Co-ordinate System (see Figure 2.3-3):
FEEP_O_p origin is the Center-of-Mass (CoM)
FEEP_X_p parallel to SC_X_p
FEEP_Y_p parallel to SC_Y_p
FEEP_Z_p parallel to SC_Z_p (completes the co-ordinate system).
FEEP_Y
FEEP_ZFEEP_X
Solar Array
2b
2aCOM
origin in CoM
Figure 2.3-3: Co-ordinate System for the FEEP Propulsion System
2.4 Acronyms
AD Applicable Document
ASU Atomic Sagnac Unit
ATOX Atomic Oxygen
BOL Begin of Life
BoM Begin of the (scientific) Mission
CA Cluster Assembly (of Cs-Slit FEEPs; term used by SMART-2)
CGPS Cold Gas Propulsion System
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 11Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
CM Calibration Mode
CMNT Colloid Micro-N Thruster
CNT Carbon Nanotube
CoM / CoG Centre of Mass / Centre of Gravity
Cs Caesium
CX Charge Exchange (ions)
DFAC Drag-Free and Attitude Control
DFP Drag-Free Point
DFS Drag-Free Sensor
DOF Degree-of-Freedom
EM Engineering Model
EoL End-of-Life
EoM End of (scientific) Mission
FEA Field Emission Array (technology of Electron emitting cathodes)
FEEP Field Effect Electric Propulsion
GG Gravity Gradient
GN2 gaseous nitrogen
GOCE Gravity and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Earth Explorer
HCM Health Check Mode
HV High-Voltage
HYPER Hyper-Precision Cold Atom Interferometry in Space
In Indium
LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
LMNIS Liquid Metal Needle Ion Source
LTP LISA Technology Package
MAIT Manufacturing, Assembly, Integration and Test
MBW Measurement Bandwidth
MEMS Micro Electro-Mechanical System
MOI Moment of Inertia
MTA Micro Thruster Assembly (term used by GOCE) (consists of one ion emitter)
MPA Micro Propulsion Assembly (term used by GOCE) (MPA consists of several ionemitters pointing into a common thrust direction; equivalent to a 'thruster')
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 12Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
MPE Micro Propulsion Electronics (term used by GOCE) (equivalent to PCU)
OB Optical Bench
PM Proof Mass
PS Propulsion System
PST Precision Star Tracker
QCM Quartz Crystal Microbalance (for contamination measurements)
QM Qualification Model
Rb Rubidium
RCS Reaction Control Subsystem (see PS)
RD Reference Document
SAA Solar Aspect Angle
SAM Secondary AOCS Mode
S/C Spacecraft
scc standard cubic centimetre (i.e. at 1 bar)
SCM Science Mode
SMART-2 Small Mission for Advanced Research & Technology
SSO Sun Synchronous Orbit
STBY Standby Mode
STEP Satellite Test of the Equivalence Principle
TBC to be confirmed
TBD to be defined
TBR to be reviewed
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 13Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
3 FEEP Propulsion Systems: Technologies
In this chapter, the existing FEEP technologies available in Europe are described.
3.1 Indium Thrusters
Two different types of Indium thrusters / emitters have been developed, respectively are in development atARCS / MAGNA:
� In-needle emitters. A suitable number of independently supplied and controlled emitters must beclustered to achieve the required maximum thrust level.
� In-multi-capillary thruster. This thruster is operated from one supply only.
3.1.1 Indium Needle Emitters
Indium-needle emitters (see schematic in Figure 3.1-1and Figure 3.1-2) consist of an indium-wettedstainless-steel needle protruding out of a liquid metal reservoir. The following voltages are applied:
Figure 3.1-1: Indium FEEP Thruster Principle Figure 3.1-2: Indium FEEP Thruster Schematic
� Needle + 5 - 9 kV
� Extractor Electrode ground
� Plume Shield (collector) ground
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 14Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
� Heater 10 V vs. ground.
The heaters of the Indium reservoirs are electrically isolated to the HV of the reservoirs, in order to simplifythe heater power supply.
The In-FEEP emitters for GOCE produce the following thrust levels:
� Nominal thrust range per emitter 0 - 35 µN
� Peak thrust up to 60 µN
For HYPER, 3 + 1 redundant emitter would be needed for each thrusters, and would produce:
� Nominal thrust range 0 - 140 µN, per thruster
� Peak thrust up to 240 µN, per thrusters.
Due to variations and differences in needle wetting (indium film thickness), each needle emitter will have adifferent current-voltage characteristic. For this reason, every emitter requires its separate power supply.This results in a large Power Control Unit (PCU): GOCE has 96 independent PCU channels; for HYPER 48independent PCU channels would be needed.
In Figure 3.1-3, emitters with different reservoir sizes are shown. In the liquid state, indium will be held bysurface tension between an internal vane system, which is not visible in Figure 3.1-3. The vane system feedsthe Indium propellant towards the needle, and allows almost complete usage of the indium mass (approx.99 %). For GOCE, a 30 gram reservoir was developed, which would also suit HYPER needs (see totalimpulse requirement).
Figure 3.1-3: Indium Needle Emitter with different Reservoir Sizes
A prototype Indium FEEP is shown in Figure 3.1-4. The extractor electrode of Figure 3.1-1 has been reducedto a tantalum Extractor Ring. The reason for this design solution is the following: Indium micro-droplets from
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 15Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
the emitter needle impinge and accumulate on the extractor. This will change the needle-extractor geometry,if the material is not removed regularly. For GOCE, it is predicted that the Extractor Ring must be heatedevery 150 - 200 h, in order to evaporate the accumulated indium. For this purpose, the HV supply of therespective emitter is switched OFF, the ring is heated for 1 - 3 minutes, and HV supply is switched ON again.The need to maintain the extractor geometry will also exist for HYPER.
Figure 3.1-4: Indium-FEEP with heatable Extractor Ring
In Figure 3.1-5, an exploded view of a multi-emitter assembly is depicted. And in Figure 3.1-6, an outlinedrawing of a cluster of two emitters is shown.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 16Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Figure 3.1-5: Indium-Needle Multi-EmitterAssembly
Figure 3.1-6: Cluster of two Prototype In-Needle FEEPEmitters (range: 100 �N, each)(ref. [RD 5-06])
Parameters Values
Thrust 0.1 – 100 µN / Emitter
Thrust Noise < 0.1 µN over period of 1,000 s
Minimum Impulse Bit < 5 nNs
Total Impulse 600 Ns per Emitter (for 15 g reservoir)
Specific Impulse 8,000-12,000 s
Singly Charged Fraction 98%
Electrical Efficiency 95%
Table 3-1: Performance Data obtained from the Protype Testing
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 17Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
In the following, a number of characterisation and performance test results are provided:
� Figure 3.1-7 shows the current-voltage curve.
0 100 200 300 400 500
5
6
7
8
9
10Em
itter
Vol
tage
[kV]
Emitter Current [µA]
Figure 3.1-7: Indium FEEP Current-Voltage Characteristic Curve
� Figure 3.1-8 shows the measured ion beam profiles, which widen up at increasing thrust level, untillimited by the plume shield geometry (approx 60° half-cone).
� Figure 3.1-9 summarises the observed beam divergence as function of thrust level(95 % of ion current).
� Figure 3.1-10 shows the measured thrust-current characteristic curve, measured on the JPL ThrustBalance Facility. The rule of thumb is 10 µA produce 1 µN.
� The mass efficiency of the FEEP needle emitter as function of the emitter current over 0 - 100 µN isshown in Figure 3.1-11. Up to approx 2 µN (20 µA), mass efficiency is almost 100 %. Above 2 µN (20µA), there is a sharp decrease, which is due to the increased emission of micro-droplets. Test resultsand model predictions are compared in [RD 5-11].
� The reported thrust level stability / resolution is illustrated in Figure 3.1-12. The FEEPs were operated in'thrust stabilised mode' (i.e. closed loop control).
� First measurement of the thrust vector directional stability were also made, and led to the need ofimproving the Extractor Ring mechanical stability. With this improvement implemented in the GOCEFEEP emitters, the expected directional stability is estimated to less than 1° half-cone.
� In Figure 3.1-13 and Figure 3.1-14, measured thrusters noise with the emitter operating at 12 µN and at50 µN with thrust stabilisation (at 12.5 Hz) is shown.
� A plot of the FEEP emitter response to commanded thrusters steps is shown in Figure 3.1-15.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 18Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.0300.49 µN
Cur
rent
[µA]
Angle [deg] -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 600.00
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
15.6 µN
Cur
rent
[µA]
Angle [deg]
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 600.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
55.6 µN
Cur
rent
[µA]
Angle [deg]
Figure 3.1-8: Ion Current Profile at (a) 0.49 �N,(b) 15.6 �N, (c) 55.6 �N
0 25 50 75 10020
30
40
50
60
70
Beam
Div
erge
nce
[deg
]
Thrust [µN]
Figure 3.1-9: Beam Divergence as function of thrust level(95 % of ion current)
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 19Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Thrust [µN] Polynomial Fit - Beam Divergence Loss 23%
Thru
st [µ
N]
Emitted Current [µA]
Figure 3.1-10: Direct Thrust Measurement of the In-Needle FEEP Thruster at JPL
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100010
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
��I-0.42
Measurements
Mas
s Ef
ficie
ncy
[%]
Current [µA]
Figure 3.1-11: Mass efficiency � vs. Emitter Current I(ref [RD 5-11])
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 20Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
3.16
3.17
3.18
3.19
3.20
Thru
st [µ
N]
Time[s]
24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 480
5
10
15
20
25
Thru
st [µ
N]
Time [h]
Figure 3.1-12: Thrust Resolution in Thrust Stabilised Operation(a) at 3.0 �N
(b) at 18.0 �N
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 21Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
1E-4 1E-3 0.01 0.1 1 101E-5
1E-4
1E-3
0.01
0.1
1
Thrust stabilizationThrust = 12 µNSampling Frequency = 12.5 HzDigital Accuracy = 12 bits
LISA Thrust Noise Requirement
Thru
st n
oise
[µN
/Hz1/
2 ]
Frequency [Hz]
Figure 3.1-13: Thruster Noise Performance at 12 �N (thrust stabilized, one emitter)
Figure 3.1-14: Thruster Noise Performance at 50 �N (thrust stabilized; one emitter)
In Figure 3.1-16, a view of a multi-emitter cluster is shown. The size of an emitter cluster consisting of 4emitters is 162 x 162 x 78mm (l x w x h).
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 22Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
38200 38400 38600 38800 39000
0
20
40
60
80
100
Thru
st [µ
N]
Time [s]
Figure 3.1-15: Response to commanded Thrust Steps(one emitter)
Figure 3.1-16: Typical view of an Indium-Needle Emitter Assembly
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 23Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Development status:
� Several engineering / lab models have been built and performance tested. A test campaign at the thrustbalance of JPL confirmed the good correspondence between electrical measurements and actual thrustbalance measurements.
� For GOCE, two prototype emitters were successfully subjected to a 2,000 h Endurance Test (completedin spring 2002)
� Currently, a new 3000 h Endurance Test is performed with one emitter from the first endurance test andwith to new emitters. This test had to be halted at approx. 1,800 h. An unexpected erosion of the needletip was observed. The failure analysis is not yet conclusive. It is planned to repeat the 3000h EnduranceTest with 3 new emitters at end of March 2003.
� The Qualification Model for GOCE, consisting of a cluster of 4 emitters is currently in production.Performance mapping is scheduled to start at end of March 2003.
3.1.2 Indium Multi-Capillary Emitters
At ARCS / MAGNA, also an Indium multi-capillary emitter was developed (see [RD 5-10], sect. 3). ThePrototype Model with 3 x 3 capillary emitters is shown without and with the extractor plate in Figure 3.1-17.
Figure 3.1-17: In-Multi-Capillary FEEP Thruster(distance between capillaries: 5 mm)
The development status can be described as follows:
� Initial performance tests performed
� New types of capillaries were performance tested in February 2003
� Detailed characterisation tests with new types of capillaries will start in summer 2003
� Endurance test will start lateron in 2003.
It is much easier to have similar emission characteristics with capillary emitters, because the Indium flowtowards the emission site is well-defined by the inner diameter of the capillary. It is therefore possible tooperate all capillary emitters in parallel with one HV supply (i.e. only one PCU channel!), which greatly
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 24Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
reduces the complexity of the electronics. The capillary emitters also share a common Indium propellantreservoir.
The number of capillaries can be adjusted to the thrust demand. In [RD 5-10], sect. 3, the followinginformation on thrust range of a 9-capillary emitter is given:
� Thrust range with near 100 % mass efficiency: up to approx 25 µN (i.e. 2 - 3 µN / capillary)
� Peak thrust capability: 1,000 µN with approx. 20% mass efficiency.
In Figure 3.1-18, the characteristic curve measured with the prototype model is shown from 0 - 450 µN.Please note the very flat voltage-current curve, which is favourable for thrust stabilisation.
The performance measured at the ONERA Thrust Balance Facility in the range from 0 - 36 µN is shown inFigure 3.1-19.
Eventually, the Indium multi-capillary emitters could become an attractive alternative to the Indium-needleemitters, e.g. emitters with 25 - 30 capillaries, in order to operate with high mass efficiency. The thrustersnoise of the multi-capillary emitters is lower than that of the needle emitters.
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 50000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Thru
st [µ
N]
Voltage
Volta
ge [V
]
Current [µA]
0
100
200
300
400
500
Thrust
Figure 3.1-18: In-Multi-Capillary Emitter - Current-Voltage and Current-Thrust Characteristic Curves
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 25Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Thrust [µN] Polynomial Fit - Beam Divergence Loss 20%
Thru
st [µ
N]
Emitted Current [µA]
Figure 3.1-19: Direct Thrust Measurement of the In Capillary FEEP Thruster at ONERA
3.2 Caesium Thrusters
The development of the Caesium-Slit FEEP thrusters has a long history and had the continuing involvementand support of ESA. The performance characterisation and modelling of this emitter type is well-documentedin reports and publications.
The Cs-Slit Thrusters are single-emitter thrusters. The length of the slit can be adapted to the respectiveneeds of different missions. Rule of thumb: approx. 15 - 20 µN per millimetre of slit length.
The thrust range of the HYPER FEEPs is identical to that of MICROSCOPE and SMART-2: 0 - 150 µN,nominal thrust range. Precision slits (approx. 1.4 micrometers in width over the slit length) of 8 mm lengthhave already been produced and tested successfully. This design is considered sound.
Also the size of the propellant reservoir (0.12 kg of Cs for SMART-2) closely matches the needs of HYPER.
Difficulties were experienced in 2002 with a slit length designed for milli-N applications. Following the abortof the 2000 h Endurance Test for GOCE, a number of improvements were initiated at ALTA, in order toovercome the experienced problems. Within the FEEP consultancy for HYPER, ALTA have identified theseareas:
� need to redesign the milli-N slit (which is longer than that used for HYPER)
� excessive Cs back-scattering in the test facility
� modification of the Cs feed system, in order to operate also in 1-g environment
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 26Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
� consequent improvement and validation of production and filling procedures and of the related GSE.
Currently, ALTA prepare for the FEEP Lifetime Test (planned duration: 1.5 years), which is anticipated tostart in mid-2003 / second half of 2003. This test program shall demonstrate the maturity of the design, of thecritical procedures, performance characteristics, and plume contamination using QCMs.
The Caesium propellant is very difficult to handle, because of its extreme reactivity. Outmost care must betaken in order to ensure that that the Cs propellant inside the thrusters / reservoir is free from contamination(oxygen, residual water). Filling operations must be undertaken in vacuum, and the thrusters must beprovided with a vacuum tight Container with a tightly closing Cover Lid + Release Mechanism. AfterAcceptance Test of the thrusters, the Cover Lid must be closed again, before the test chamber can bevented and opened. It must be pointed out, that contaminations of the propellant can not be directlymeasured. It is only the quality of contamination control in each step, which provides assurance that thepropellant is not contaminated. Some contamination will be removed, when the thrusters are started up. Thisstart up capability has been observed, but not quantified. It can be expected that spectrum of difficultiesassociated with the Caesium propellant will be overcome, within the MICROSCOPE and SMART-2programs.
The Container + Cover Lid make the individual thrusters quite large (see Figure 3.2-1).
Figure 3.2-1: ICD of the individual CS-Slit Thruster (Cover Lid closed
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 27Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
The Propellant Reservoir is sized for 0.12 kg of Cs, but can be adapted in length to the actual need, withoutproblems. In order to transport the propellant to the emitter, a vane system is integrated into the reservoircylinder (see Figure 3.2-2). Whether the liquid Cs inside the reservoir will move under the action of gravitygradient, or under the influence of period temperature changes on the HYPER orbit cannot be judged at thisstage.
Figure 3.2-2: Propellant Management Device inside Cs-Reservoir(emitter interface is on the left side)
In Figure 3.2-3 and Figure 3.2-4, the current mechanical design of the Cluster Assembly (CA) for SMART-2is shown. Four (4) FEEPs are arranged 90° apart and with a tilt angle of 60°. On top of the CA, theneutralisers are mounted. The accommodation of such CA's on the HYPER S/C (at mid-height) wouldrequire an octagonal S/C body and would significantly reduce the available volume inside the S/C.
Figure 3.2-3: ICD of the Cs-FEEP Cluster Assembly for SMART-2
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 28Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Figure 3.2-4: ICD of the Cs-FEEP Cluster Assembly for SMART-2
The 60° tilt angle is probably not compatible with the circular Solar Array. The above concerns may leadaway from a thruster arrangement as used on SMART-2 (see sect. 4.2), and towards thrusters arrangementoption 1, which is defined in sect. 4.1.4.
ALTA are currently working on three contracts for ESA:
� MICROSCOPE (with CNES): max. thrust 150 µN;Status: close to PDR; launch planned 2005 -2006
� Development of the FEEP Cluster for SMART-2: max thrust 150 µN;Status: CDR completed; manufacturing of EM / QM thrusters on-going; qualification of a cluster
� Lifetime Test, including performance characterisation, direct thrust measurements in the Alenia facility,plume contamination measurements with QCMs, etc.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 29Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
3.3 Neutralisers
For FEEP applications, neutralisers are needed - not for the proper operation of the FEEP emittersthemselves, but for the compensation of S/C charging due to the emitted positive ion current. For thisreason, neutralisers positions can be chosen on any suitable location on the S/C, assuming adequateconductive paths.
The charged particle environment on the 1,000 km orbit will provide some charge compensation. But at thisstage of definition, it is assumed, that the neutraliser(s) must compensate the full charging due to the FEEPthruster ion beams.
Specifics of HYPER:
� maximum thrust level of all FEEPs combined < 500 �Ncorresponding to a total emission current of ~ 5 mA
� residual atmosphere at 1,000 km is << 10-8 mbar. In this environment, cathode degradation due toresidual atmosphere is negligible.
� neutralisers can be positioned outside the areas with charge exchange ions. Also this degradingenvironment would not be relevant for the neutralisers on HYPER.
In [RD 7-01], a thorough survey of the various neutraliser technologies and of their development status wasperformed and a preliminary trade-off performed. Candidate neutralisers for FEEP application are:
� Low-power thermionic cathodes
� Field Emission Array (FEA) cathodes produced in MEMS technology
� Carbon Nanotube (CNT) FEA cathodes.
For all 3 categories / technologies suitable cathodes exist or are promising and under development. In[RD 7-01], the preliminary trade-off led to the following ranking, based on performance reasons:
� Rank 1: FEA cathode by RAL-CMF, followed by FE Picture Element Technology (FEPET) carbonnanotube cathode (NASA-JPL).
� Rank 2: Scandate thermionic cathode by HeatWave; other FEA cathodes (CEA-LETI and StanfordResearch Institute), Carbon nanotube cathode by BUSEK.
The survey performed in [RD 7-01] is exhaustive and fully adequate for the HYPER Feasibility Study. Theranking was independently confirmed by SMART-2 Phase A, which also selected the FEA cathode of RAL-CMT. Some characteristics are given below:
� extractor electrode potential 60 V
� electron current emitted per micro-tip approx. 5 �A
� technology qualified for a ROSETTA instrument
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 30Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
� life-time test without significant degradation 1,000 h(cf. HYPER mission life-time 17,500 h).
However, it must be pointed out that neutralisers are no negligible cost element, in particular the FEAcathode of RAL-CMT! It is therefore recommended to reduce the number of neutralisers onboard HYPER to2 units (one main and one cold redundant neutraliser, total). This also reduces the number of neutralisersupply & control channels in the PCU. In a next step towards neutraliser selection, cost and developmentstatus / SMART-2 heritage for the different neutralisers must be taken into account.
At the time being, only the thermionic neutraliser from Thales-Thomson is space and lifetime qualified. Thisneutraliser must be protected against atmosphere (requires container with cover lid).
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 31Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
4 Requirements and Constraints for the FEEP System
In this chapter, the requirements relevant for the Micro-Propulsion System of HYPER, as specified in HYP-5-01, are compared with the requirements on the Micro-Propulsion Systems of SMART-2 and of GOCE. Briefconclusions are given in sect. 4.5.
4.1 FEEP Application for HYPER
4.1.1 FEEP Thruster Usage
After S/C initial rate damping and attitude acquisition, and after the Micro-Newton Propulsion System hasbeen checked-out and commissioned, the FEEP Micro-Newton Propulsion System will be activated and itsthrusters will become the primary actuators. At the beginning of the Science Phase, two alternatives exist:
(a) the Cold Gas Propulsion System (CGPS) is fully vented, and the FEEP System will become the solecontrol authority, without any backup to cope with unforeseen events
(b) the CGPS is put into a minimum-leakage stand-by configuration. In this case, it will be possible to re-activate the CGPS upon need, e.g. in case of emergency. In sect. 5, the trade-off between vented CGPSvs. stand-by CGPS is performed. The trade-off concludes with the recommendation to maintain theCGPS in stand-by. Disturbances originating from the CGPS can be held below the limiting levelsimposed by the Payload.
In Table 4.1-1, the FEEP thruster usage during the different mission phases is outlined. As sole controlauthority during Science Phase, the FEEP Micro-N Propulsion System must support both, Primary AOCSand Secondary AOCS. Secondary AOCS has to provide disturbance compensation and attitude control atthe performance levels required during the science measurements. Primary AOCS will operate either in amode identical to that of Secondary AOCS, but with reduced performance requirements, or in a mode with acoarser sensor complement.
In [AD-05], an orbit insertion error of δh = +/- 20 km and δi = +/- 0.05° is quoted. Without any orbit insertionerror correction, the drift of the LTAN is in the order of a few degrees over the complete mission life time. Anassessment by Astrium UK indicate, that the small orbit drift is tolerable for the experiments. Orbit insertionerror correction is therefore not required, and a small GN2 propellant tank will suffice for HYPER.
It is recommended to maintain a well-defined cold gas reserve of up to 0.5 kg of GN2 at BoM, which allowsto reduce mission risk during Science Phase.
Space Debris Mitigation Standards / Guidelines demand that LEO satellites "should, whenever possible, besafely de-orbited within 25 years".
In [AD-05], de-orbiting with 500 �N and 1,000 �N was analysed. The conclusions drawn from [AD-05] are,that de-orbiting from the 1,000 km reference orbit would be design driving for the FEEP Micro-PropulsionSystem with respect to:
� required total impulse capability (approx. 80,000 N s), additional to the total impulse required for theScience Phase
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 32Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Phase FEEP Thruster Usage and Comments
Acquisition Phase � transition from Cold Gas RCS control to FEEP control� sun pointing attitude acquisition / hold
Commissioning Phase � In-flight FEEP calibration� Commissioning of Secondary AOCS
Science Phase -Measurement Seasons
� Slew to and acquisition of new Guide Stars� Scientific Measurement periods
Science Phase -eclipse seasons, outages,emergency operations,recovery
� ground station outage over several days� on-board anomalies leading to autonomous Sun pointing attitude
acquisition� regular thruster maintenance, if needed
Table 4.1-1: FEEP Thruster Usage during HYPER Mission Phases
� additional 10 years of required life-time and operational support for S/C Bus and FEEP Micro-PropulsionSystem.
� Sun-synchronicity would be lost, complicating S/C operations, unless also inclination changemanoeuvres are performed (requiring an extra of approx. 90,000 Ns).
EOL de-orbiting is not compatible with the HYPER satellite concept. It would be overly design-driving withrespect to maximum thrust level and total propellant demand, and would not be commensurate for a smalland optimised scientific satellite like HYPER. EOL de-orbiting is therefore not baselined.
4.1.2 Disturbance Forces and Disturbance Moments
The different disturbances (forces and torques) that must be compensated with the FEEP System aresummarised in Table 4.1-2. The major disturbances are shown in bold.
All major disturbances occur as cyclic effects (approximately periodic with �orbit or with 2 �orbit), because thesatellite attitude is held inertially fixed.
Based on disturbance force and torque simulations reported in HYP-2-01 "Secondary AOCS Design Report",the nominal thrust range and the peak thrust capability of each thrusters are specified in HYP-5-01 "FEEPRequirements Specification".
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 33Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Sources of disturbance forces Sources of disturbance torques
� Gravity Gradient radial effect (due todistance between CoM and Drag-Free Point)
� Gravity Gradient torque (due tounsymmetric MOI and offset angles betweenSC_X_p and orbit normal)
� Gravity Gradient perpendicular effect (dueto distance between CoM and Drag-FreePoint)
� Residual S/C magnetic moment interactingwith Earth Magnetic Field
� Air drag � Air drag induced torques (due to geometricasymmetry, in particular at offset anglesbetween SC_X_p and orbit normal)
� Solar pressure � Solar pressure induced torques(due to geometric asymmetry, in particular atoffset angles between SC_X_p and orbitnormal)
� Earth Albedo and IR � Earth Albedo and IR induced torques
� Parasitic accelerations due to thrusteralignment errors
� Parasitic moments due to thrust vectoralignment and position errors
� Parasitic accelerations due to thrustermismatch errors
� Parasitic moments due to thruster mismatcherrors
Table 4.1-2: List of Disturbance Forces and Moments
4.1.3 Baselined Thruster Arrangement for HYPER
For HYPER, several thruster arrangements were investigated. Two alternatives exist, depending on theFEEP thrusters technology ultimately selected.
Option 1:
Four clusters, each with 3 thrusters, are located at the corners of the S/C on opposite diagonals:
� Group {1, 2, 3, 4} is pointing into +/- X
� group {11, 12, 13, 14} into +/- Y
� group {21, 22, 23, 24} into +/- Z.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 34Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Figure 4.1-1: HYPER FEEP Thruster Arrangement (Option 1)with 4 x 3 thrusters
Table 4.1-3 outlines which control forces and moments can be produced by different combinations ofthrusters:
� All three rotational DOFs can be controlled with with full redundancy.
� No redundancy exists for the three translational DOFs.
This configuration is well-suited for the Indium-Needle Thrusters. The missing redundancy for thetranslational DOFs is achieved by adding one additional emitter to each of the 12 thrusters.
In case of In-Multi-Capillary thrusters or Cs-Slit thrusters, the missing redundancy can be achieved by either:
� doubling of the 12 thrusters, or by
� introducing of a fourth group of tilted thrusters {31, 32, 33, 34} - see Figure 4.1-2. All of these fourthrusters point through S/C CoM, and provide only linear forces.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 35Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Function Primary Set Secondary Set
Force in + X 3 + 4 (33 + 34)
Force in - X 1 + 2 (31 + 32)
Force in + Y 11 + 14 (31 + 34)
Force in - Y 12 +13 (32 + 33)
Force in + Z 22 + 24 (31 + 33)
Force in - Z 21 + 23 (32 + 34)
torque about X (+) 13 + 14 21 + 22
torque about X (-) 11 + 12 23 + 24
torque about Y (+) 2 + 3 21 + 24
torque about Y (-) 1 + 4 22 + 23
torque about Z (+) 2 + 4 11 + 13
torque about Z (-) 1 + 3 12 +14
Table 4.1-3: Thruster combinations to produce control forces and moments
Option 2:
Four clusters are arranged at the four corners of the S/C, at mid-height - see Figure 4.1-3. Two groups aredefined:
� group {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} firing tangentially in the Y-Z plane, producing forces in +/- Y and +/- Z, andmoments about +/- X
� group {11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18} firing tangentially in the X-Z plane, producing forces in +/- X, andmoments about +/- X, +/- Y and +/- Z.
This configuration is well-suited for the Cs-Slit thrusters, which have an ion beam width (90%) of +/- 20° x+/- 40°. It is very similar to the thrusters arrangement proposed for SMART-2. If used on HYPER, it requiresan octagonal S/C body, in order to fit into the ROCKOT fairing.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 36Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Figure 4.1-2: HYPER FEEP Thruster Arrangement (Option 1 a)with 4 x 3 plus 4 x 1 thrusters
1
2
3
4
6
8
5
7
� � 45°
Solar Array
11
12
13
14
18
16
17
15
Figure 4.1-3: HYPER FEEP Thruster Arrangement (Option 2)(a) showing thrusters {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} and
(b) showing thrusters {11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18}
33
31
34
32
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 37Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Function Primary Set Secondary Set Third Set
force in + X 11+ 13 + 15 + 17 11 + 15+ Torque x (-) pair,
or13 + 17
+ Torque x (+) pair
force in - X 12 + 14 +16 + 18 12 + 16+ Torque x (-) pair,
or14 + 18
+ Torque x (+) pair
force in + Y 2 + 3 5 + 8 2 + 3 + 5 + 8
force in - Y 6 + 7 1 + 4 1 + 4 + 6 + 7
force in + Z 4 + 5 2 + 7 4 + 5 + 2 + 7
force in - Z 1 + 8 3 + 6 1 + 8 + 3 + 6
torque about X (+) 1 + 5 3 + 7
torque about X (-) 2 + 6 4 + 8
torque about Y (+) 11 +14 16 + 17
torque about Y (-) 12 + 13 15 + 18
torque about Z (+) 11 + 13 + 16 + 18 11 + 18+ Force z (+) pair,
or13 + 16
+ Force z (-) pair
torque about Z (-) 12 + 14 + 15 + 17 12 + 17+ Force z (+) pair,
or14 + 15
+ Force z (-) pair
Table 4.1-4: Thruster combinations to produce control forces and moments (Option 2)
Due to the tilt angles (approx. 45°), lower thrust levels are produced with one thrusters pair. On the otherside, the thrusters can be operated in quadruples ! Some thrusters pairs produce parasitic torques orparasitic forces, which must be compensated by an additional pair.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 38Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
4.1.4 HYPER Requirements on FEEP System
See HYP-5-01 "FEEP Requirements Specification".
4.2 SMART-2 Requirements
In the SMART-2 Phase A studies, Cs-Slit FEEP thrusters were baselined. The recommended thrustersarrangements from the Phase A studies, and a summary of the requirements specified in [RD 2-05] and[RD 2-06] is given below.
4.2.1 SMART-2 Thruster Arrangement
Two SMART-2 Phase A Studies were performed, one by CASA (E) and one by Astrium (UK). These twostudies arrived at almost the same thruster arrangements.
Figure 4.2-1: Arrangement of the 4 Clusters of 4 Thrusters, each(SMART-2, CASA-Study)
Smart-2 has an octagonal S/C body. Both Phase A studies recommend to mount the FEEP clusterassemblies on the middle of the side panels (see Figure 4.2-1).
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 39Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
In Figure 4.2-2 and Figure 4.2-3, the two arrangements are shown. Astrium have proposed to rotate theClusters by 45° compared to the CASA version. Figure 4.2-3 also illustrates the 90% ion beam width of the16 FEEP thrusters (+/- 20° x +/- 40°, each).
Figure 4.2-2: FEEP Thruster Arrangement (CASA Phase A)(FEEP thrusters shown red)
Figure 4.2-3: FEEP Thruster Arrangement (Astrium Phase A)(FEEP thrusters shown red; ion beam width shown yellow)
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 40Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
4.2.2 SMART-2 Requirements Summary
A summary of the FEEP requirements specified in [RD 2-01] and [RD 2-06] are given below in tabular form.
The SMART-2 mission lifetime is 5 years in orbit. This long mission lifetime, requires high reliability andcontinuous availability of the FEEP Micro-Propulsion System. These requirements have not yet beenformulated.
In Figure 4.2-4, the thruster noise requirements of SMART-2 (shown green) applies for thrust levels above25 �N (from [AD-02]. In the mean time, these requirements have apparently been tightened to < 1 10-7
N/�Hz below 25 �N, and < 0.5 10-6 N/�Hz above 25 �N (see [RD 2-06]).
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
10010
-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
Frequency [Hz]
SpectralDensityN/sqrt(Hz)
GOCESmart-2
Figure 4.2-4: SMART-2 Thruster Noise Requirements(green line)
Technology: Cesium-Slit Emitter; single-emitter thrusters
Nomenclature:
CA Cluster Assembly consisting of 4 single-emitter thrusters and 2 neutralisers
PCU Power Control Unit for one Cluster Assembly
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 41Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table 4.2-1: Preliminary SMART-2 Requirements:
Requirements Value Remarks
0. Elements of FEEP System
4 CAs, each with 4 thrusters, each with 1 emitter, 1 reservoir, 1 container with Cover Lid 2 neutralisers
4 PCUs
Thrusters at 60° cantangle; separated by 90°
Cs reservoir with 0.12 kgof Cs propellant
1. Ion Beam
Ion beam divergence(> 90 %)
+/- 20° along slit;+/- 40° cross slit
[RD 2-06]
2. Thrust Range
min.thrust per emitter 1 �N (required)0.1 �N (goal)
[RD 2-05][RD 2-06]
max. thrust per emitter 150 �N [RD 2-05], [RD 2-06]
3. Characteristic Curve
Bias No specification Fachieved = Fcommanded + B
Max. deviation from linearity No specification
Hysteresis No specification
Scale Factor Error No specification
thrust accuracy +/- 0.5 % repeatability over lifetime [RD 2-06]
4. Thrust Response
thrust command time 500 ms 2 Hz update rate[RD 2-05]
rise and fall time to 90% for��Fc�= 1�N
< 100 ms for ��Fc�= 1 �N[< 500 ms for ��Fc�= 150 �N]
due to PCU; emittersrespond within a few ms;[RD 2-05]
5. Quantisation step
Quantisation step 0.1 �N below 50 �N0.3 �N from 50 �N - 150 �N
[RD 2-05][RD 2-06]
Table 4.2-1: Preliminary SMART-2 Requirements (continued)
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 42Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
6. Thrust Vector Noise
thrust noise (1 - 10-4 Hz) < 1 10-7 N/�Hz up to 25 �N< 0.5 10-6 N/�Hz above 25 �N
no split between thrusterand PCU; [RD 2-06]
7. Thrust Vector
Thruster directions cant angle � = 30° - 60° w.r.t. common mountingplane of CA;[RD 2-05]
thrust stability < 0.5 % over entire life [RD 2-06]
deviation actual fromnominal thrust direction
3° (half-cone, 3 sigma) over lifetime [RD 2-06]
thrust direction stability < 0.5 ° over entire life [RD 2-06]
thrust vector position no specification
8. MTA Total Impulse
total impulse per thruster 10,000 N s [RD 2-05]
minimum specific impulse > 7,000 s [RD 2-05][RD 2-06]
mass efficiency at150 �N
no specification
size of Cs reservoir 0.12 kg of Cs per thruster [RD 2-05]
9. MPA Total Mass
mass of each CA < 3.75 kg ALTA input
mass of each PCU 4.65 kg +/- 5 % 1 PCU for each CA;[RD 2-05]
10. Dimensions
dimensions of each CA -- Not relevant for HYPER
dimensions of each PCU 119 x 338 x 187.5 mm 4 boxes (l x w x h);[RD 2-05]
11. FEEP System Power
basic power for PCUoperating; 0 �N thrust
23.89 W per PCU
delta-power for PCUoperating; 150 �N thrust
< 30 W for 4 x 150 �N thrust
Table 4.2-1: Preliminary SMART-2 Requirements (continued)
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 43Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
HV for thrusters emitter: between + 2.5 and 9 kV;accelerator: from - 1 to - 3 kV(fixed setting)
[RD 2-06]
Gate voltage forneutralisers
+ 75 V to + 200 V RAL FEA Neutraliser[RD 2-05]
Neutraliser levels low: 2.5 mA (at < 50 �N);high: 7.5 mA (at 50 - 150 �N);
at each CA;Iemitter 1.5 mA, eachthruster[RD 2-05]
14. Heating
FEEP thruster < 5 W per emitter;< 5 W per reservoir
during nominal operation;[RD 2-05]
neutraliser: low level: 2.16 Whigh level: 3.56 W
during nominal operation;[RD 2-05]
13. Redundancy / Failure Tolerance / Reliability
Thruster redundancy /failure tolerance
failure tolerance: any 1 thruster outof 16 thrusters
adequacy to be verifiedagainst reliability !
PCU redundancy Main + Redundant Logic Section;independent thruster supply;independent neutraliser supply
[RD 2-05]
Neutraliser redundancy 1 main + 1 cold redundant unit ateach CA
[RD 2-05]
FDIR only overload / overcurrent aremanaged autonomously by the PCU
telemetry available to OBC
needed to avoid failurepropagation[RD 2-05]
Mission Lifetime 5 years of operational flight [RD 2-05], [RD 2-06]
Reliability no specification found
13. Verification
Life-time 1.5 years Lifetime Test
Plume / Contamination no specification
verification by test of eachthruster
no specification
Table 4.2-2: Preliminary SMART-2 Requirements
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 44Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
4.3 GOCE Requirements
GOCE will be the first mission that will use FEEPs within a Drag Free and Attitude Control System. Micro-NFEEP thrusters are used for:
� side force compensation
� fine attitude control
� instrument calibration by producing precise accelerations.
GOCE has selected Indium-Needle Emitters as the currently best-proven and available FEEP technology,and as a technology which is less sensitive to the ATOX environment.
Note, that due to its low altitude, air drag compensation in flight direction is performed with Ion Thrusters,which operate in the milli-N range.
4.3.1 GOCE Thruster Arrangement
Each thrust direction is equipped with 12 In-needle emitters.
The thruster arrangement on GOCE is shown in Figure 4.3-1 (see [RD 3-01] and [RD 3-03]). Each of the 8Micro-Thruster Assemblies (MTA) shown in Figure 4.3-1 consists of 12 Indium-Needle Emitters, in order toproduce the required maximum operational thrust level of 400 �N per MTA, respectively 650 �N duringaccelerometer calibration periods.
The reservoir size per Indium Emitter is 30 grams, which exceeds the required total impulse capability by afactor of 2. The number of Indium Emitters per MTA is solely driven by the high thrust levels needed foradequate control authority. One of the 12 emitters is implemented to provide redundancy (1 out of 12).
A major area of concern for GOCE is surface contamination. The beam of energetic Indium ions is 100 %limited to its beam divergence of 60°, half-cone. However, low-energetic liquid metal micro-droplet and back-flow ions can occur outside this cone. Due to the criticality for the GOCE Solar Array, the 3000 h ExtendedEndurance Test includes contamination measurements on witness surfaces at 90° from the beam direction.This test started in October 2002, and will provide useful information at end of March 2003.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 45Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Solar Array
MTA at 30°
Figure 4.3-1: Thruster Arrangement on GOCE
4.3.2 GOCE Requirements Summary
In Table 4.3-1, the requirements on the Micro-Thruster Assemblies (MTA) and on the Micro PropulsionElectronics (MPE) are summarised (from [RD 3-01]). It must be emphasised that these requirements are stillin the process of improved definition and consolidation. GOCE has already entered Phase C/D (whileSMART-2 is in Phase A-Extension). FEEP CDR is planned in summer 2003.
In Figure 4.3-2, the thruster noise requirements of GOCE are shown.
Due to its low altitude, and due to the neutralisers of the Ion Thrusters, no extra neutralisers for the FEEPthrusters are needed. S/C charging by the FEEP thrusters is no issue for GOCE.
Technology: Indium-Needle Emitters
Nomenclature:
MTA Micro-Thruster Assembly, consisting of 12 Indium-Needle Emitters
MPA Micro-Propulsion Assembly, consisting of 1 MTA + 1 Micro-Propulsion Electronics (MPE)supply channel
MPE Micro-Propulsion Electronics (synonym: Power Control Unit (synonym: PCU))
MTA
MTA
MTA
Z
Y
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 46Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
10010
-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
Frequency [Hz]
SpectralDensityN/sqrt(Hz)
GOCESmart-2
Figure 4.3-2: GOCE Thruster Noise Requirements(dashed blue line)
Table 4.3-1: Summary of Requirements applicable to GOCE's Micro-Thruster Assemblies (MTA) and to Micro-Propulsion Electronics (MPE)
Requirement Value Remarks
0. Elements of the FEEP System
8 MTAs
2 MPEs
12 emitters, each
48 independent channels,each
1. Ion Beam
beam divergence 60° half-cone;containing at least 100 % of primaryions
reason: Indium sputteringonto Solar Array
Effectiveness of plumeshields
under investigated on-going test within the3000 h extendedendurance test
2. Thrust Demand Profile
thrust demand profile duringmission
preliminary thrust profile given highly dynamic comparedto SMART-2
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 47Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table 4.3-2: (continued)
3. Characteristic Curve
min. thrust per MTA 2 �N with 12 needle emitters
max. thrust per MTA- normal operations- during P/L calibration
400 �N650 �N
Bias 10 �N (MTA + MPE) 6 �N (MTA alone)
Fachieved = Fcommanded + B
Max. deviation from linearity 10 �N (MPA)
Hysteresis 20 �N (MPA)
Scale Factor Error 5 % (MPA) 1 % (MTA alone)
4. Thrust Response
overshoot 5 % of commanded step (MPA)none (MTA)
rise time to 95% for��Fc� 100 �N
< 70 ms (MPA)< 5 ms (MTA alone)
��Fc� 100 �N total by 12emitters
delay time not specified (irrelevant)
5. Quantisation step
Quantisation step < 0.64 �N 12 emitters in parallel !
6. Thrust Vector Noise
thrust vector noise10-4 - 3 10-3 Hz3 10-3 - 10-2 Hz10-2 - 104 Hz
10 % of the following:5 10-4 N/�Hzslope6 10-7 N/�Hz
90 % allocated to MPE;10 % allocated to MTA
over full thrust range2 �N - 650 �N
7. Thrust Vector
nominal MTA thrust vectoralignment accuracy
0.1° (half-cone) normal to mounting plane
deviation MTA actual fromnominal thrust direction
1° (3 sigma) over thrust range;over life-time
MTA thrust vector position 5 mm (3 sigma) internal errors;1 mm MTA mounting error
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 48Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table 4.3-2: (continued)
8. MTA Total Impulse
total impulse per MTA 6,045 Ns assumptions not defined
9. MPA Total Mass
mass of one MTA ~ 5.0 kg status
mass of MPE < 66 kg for 96 emitters
10. Dimensions
dimensions MTA -- See ICD
dimensions MPE 2 boxes of 383 x 411 x 270 mm, or4 boxes of 383 x 238 x 270 mm
2 boxes are baseline forGOCE
11. MPA Power
basic power MPA;operating, 0 �N
175 W, total @ 28 VDC; for 96 emitters
power for 2 MTAs, each at400 �N
0.091 W per 1 �N @ 28 VDC; newinformation
12. Redundancy
MTA internal 11 + 1 redundant = 12 emittersfor each MTA
all emitter channels areindependent: furtherfailures lead to gracefuldegradation
MPE internal Main + Redundant Logic Section;independent emitter supplies
13. Verification
Life-time by technology life time test(s)
Plume / Contamination within technology demonstration (bytest)
= part of ExtendedEndurance Test
verification by test on eachMTA
performance test
thrust characterisation(ramp, steady-state, steps)
thrust vector noise
thrust vector stability (direction)
preliminary list
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 49Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
4.4 Comparison of Requirements
HYPER Requirements SMART-2 GOCE Remarks
No. Requirement
3.3.1-2 Neutralisersneeded
2 neutralisers perCluster of 4 thrusters(1 main + 1 coldredundant);2 commandable levels:2,5 mA (low) and 7.5mA (high)
Not needed forGOCE OK
3.3.1-3 Ion BeamDivergence< 60° half-cone(100%)
Ion Beam width is20° x 40° (90%)
Ion BeamDivergence <60° half-cone(100%)
OK
3.3.1-4 Provisions toavoid plumecontamination at90° from ionbeam direction
No equivalentrequirement yetdefined
Provisions toavoid plumecontamination at90° from ionbeam directionalso required forGOCE
in definition /verification
3.3.1-5 Health / IntegrityCheck in flight
compliant compliant OK
3.3.2-1 Total deliverableimpulse perthruster
compliant 2 x HYPERrequirement
OK
3.3.2-2 Maximum thrustlevel perthrusters:- 100 µNnominal max- 150 µN peak
150 µN max With 12 In-needle emitters:- 400 µNnominal max- 600 µN peak
OK with currentthrust demand
3.3.2-3 Min. Thrust level 0.5 µN
1 µN (required); 0.1µN (goal)
< 0.64 µN with 4emitters
OK, becausemin. thrust levelcan be produ-ced by oppositethrusters
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 50Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
HYPER Requirements SMART-2 GOCE Remarks
No. Requirement
3.3.2-6 Required close-loop response:10 µN / s
no equivalentrequirement
no equivalentrequirement
OK(reportedperformances)
3.3.2-7 Thrust commandupdate rate: 10Hz
2 Hz 2 Hz (TBC) HYPER reqtcan probablybe relaxed to2 Hz withoutimpact
3.3.2-8 Thrust bias errorper thruster: < +/-4 µN
Contained in thrustrepeatabilityrequirementR3.3.2-14
Equivalentrequirement
OK
3.3.2-9 Scale Factor(Gain) error:< 5 %
Contained in thrustrepeatabilityrequirementR3.3.2-14
Equivalentrequirement
OK
3.3.2-10 Deviation fromlinearity:< 4 µN perthruster
Contained in thrustrepeatabilityrequirementR3.3.2-14
Equivalentrequirement
OK
3.3.2-11 Hysteresis < 8 µNper thruster
Contained in thrustrepeatabilityrequirementR3.3.2-14
Equivalentrequirement
OK
3.3.2-12 Thrust responseto +/- 10 µN step:< 5 % overshoot< 100 ms risetime (95 %)
< 100 ms for +/- 1µN step
Equivalentrequirement
Probablybothcompliant
3.3.2-13 Thrustquantisation step:< 0.1 µN
0.1 µN for < 50 µN
0.3 µN for 50 - 150µN
< 0.2 µN with 4emitters
OK(no hardrequirement)
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 51Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
HYPER Requirements SMART-2 GOCE
No. Requirement
3.3.2-14 Thrustrepeatabilitywithin therequirements ofR3.3.2-8 toR3.3.2-12
Better than HYPERrequirement
Equivalentrequirement OK
3.3.2-15 Thrust noise: useGOCE reqt
Better than GOCErequirements
Identicalrequirement
OK
3.3.2-16 Thrust vectorangular stability:(a) < 0.5° (3)over thrust range0 - 150 µN(b) < 0.5° (3)over lifetime
Yet to be verified bytest
Some testevidence; requiredstability yet to beverified by test
Thisperformancemust yet beverified bytest
3.3.2-17 Thrust vectorangular noise(random variationof thrustdirection):< 0.1° half-cone(rms)
Yet to be measuredby test
Some testevidence; yet to bemeasured by test
Thisperformancemust yet beverified bytest
3.3.2-18 Only short andisolated sparkingevents
5 mm Slit probablycompliant
Confirmed by test OK
3.3.2-20 Thruster shalloperate in fullsun-light and inshade
compliant compliant OK
3.4.1-1 Size of propellantreservoir to meetR3.3.2-1
Compliant;0.12 kg Cs perthruster
Compliant;0.03 kg Cs peremitter
OK
3.4.1-2 Suitablepropellantmanagementdevice
Vane systemcurrently underoptimisation
Compliant;99 % propellantusage
OK;Cs reservoirin redesign
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 52Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
HYPER Requirements SMART-2 GOCE Remarks
No. Requirement
3.4.1-3 Protection ofpropellant againstcontamination
Major issue with Cs;under optimisation
(a) vacuum tightemitter container withCover LidMechanism for eachthrusters
(b) critical propellanthandling and loadingprocedure
Uncritical withIndium
Adequacy forCs propellantunderdevelopment /validation(preparationfor LifetimeTest program)
3.4.1-4 Heaters - reservoir
- emitter slit
- reservoir /needle
- extractor ring
both compliant
3.4.1-5 Plume Shield &collector for low-energy ions
compliant Identicalrequirement
OK
3.4.1-6 Analytical and testevidence of plumecontaminationoutside primarybeam to beprovided
See test program oflifetime test;compliant
See test programof 3000 hExtendedEndurance Test;compliant
Test evidenceto be revieweduponavailability
3.4.1-7 Management ofback-flow material/ avoid sputteringon S/C surfaces
Similar requirement Similarrequirement
See commentto R3.4.1-6
3.4.1-7 Stability ofEmitter-Accelerometergeometry
Not needed heating ExtractorRing (1 - 3 min)required in regularintervals ofapprox. 200 h
OK;In-needleemittersrequire heating
3.4.2-1 Mission Lifetime:2.25 years in orbit
5 years in orbit 2.5 years in orbit OK
3.4.2-2 Adequate failuretolerance
1 out of 16 thrusters 1 out of 12emitters perthruster
Adequacy tobe reviewedafter lifetimetests
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 53Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
HYPER Requirements SMART-2 GOCE Remarks
No. Requirement
3.4.2-3 RedundancyConcept
16 independentthrusters
Redundant PCULogic
8 x 12independentemitter channels(i.e. PCU +emitterchannels)
Redundant PCULogic
both compliant
3.4.2-4 Commensuratereliability
yet TBD yet TBD TBD
3.4.3-1 Environmentalconditions ofROCKOT or DNEPRlaunch
compliant compliant OK
3.4.4-1 Failure Detection andIsolation:(a) health info foronboard failuredetection andisolation
(b) adequate HK andhealth data for on-ground diagnostics
compliant compliant OK
3.4.5-1 Mass :(a) 35 kg, if Cs-Slit
(b) 57 kg, if In-Needle
compliant Compliant(2 x number ofHYPERthrusters)
Mass of In-multicapillaryoption wouldapprox.correspond toCs-Slit option
3.4.5-2 Dimensionsaccording existingh/w
Cluster Assembly For HYPER,number ofthrusters and ofPCU are 50 %of GOCE
OK;
Cluster Assyfrom SMART-2may have tobe tailored forHYPER config.constraints
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 54Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
HYPER Requirements SMART-2 GOCE Remarks
No. Requirement
3.5.1-2 Propellant Loading:proven procedures,GSE and relatedinterfaces
In validationprior to LifetimeTest
Automatic wettingprocedures;rest uncritical
Indium: OK
Cesium: to bereviewed uponavailability
3.5.2-1 Electrical interfaces compliant compliant OK
3.5.2-2 Maximum Power:(a) operating @ 0 µN
(b) operating @ 300 µNcompliant compliant OK
4.5 Conclusions
In the summary table of sect. 4.4, no essential new performance requirements for the FEEP System ofHYPER were identified, compared to those of SMART-2 and GOCE. Heritage from these two programs willbe usable for HYPER.
Both Indium thruster types and the Cs-Slit thruster must be considered feasible for HYPER, if the respectiveon-going / planned endurance and lifetime test programs are successfully completed.
The largest impact have probably the configurational constraints of the launcher fairing. Most likely, they willdemand modifications to the thrusters accommodation.
There are a number of minor modifications, which will not have a driving impact on the existing FEEPtechnologies. These are:
� Sampling rate
� Configuration of the cluster assemblies.
From a system point-of-view, thrusters arrangement, and mass and power values of the FEEP System mayneed further optimisation.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 55Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
5 FEEP Trade-off Criteria
In [RD 8-01], trade-offs of micro-propulsion systems were performed. For almost all comparable missions,two alternatives ranked highest:
� colloid thrusters,
� FEEP thrusters.
Colloid thrusters are developed by the US-supplier BUSEK, and have been proposed as US-contribution forSMART-2. In SMART-2 Phase B, the technical assessment of this micro-propulsion alternative will beperformed. In this report, only the trade criteria for the Caesium and Indium FEEP alternatives wereelaborated.
In Table 5-1, the trade criteria are identified for two options: In-needle FEEPs and Cs-slit FEEPs. A weighingof the trade criteria is recommended at a later stage, when the Cs-Slit emitter for SMART-2 has completedthe various tests associated with the Lifetime Test program, i.e. when the mission lifetime requirement hasbeen demonstrated for the Cs-slit emitter technology. The same holds for the Indium FEEPs (needle emittersand multi-capillary emitters). At that stage, also more test evidence will be available for the Indium multi-capillary emitters, which are considered a promising third alternative.
Table 5-1: Trade Criteria In-Needle vs. Cs-Slit Emitters
Indium-Needle EmitterTechnology
Caesium-Slit Emitter Technology
(1) Development Status of Emitters
- similar emitters have been flight- proven
- successful 2000 h Endurance Test in 2002
- on-going Extended 3000 h Endu- rance Test until end of March 2003; includes some contamin- ation measurements at 90° from beam direction
- manufacturing processes established; some design optimisations introduced for GOCE (Phase C/D)
- severe problems have led to abort the 2000 h Endurance Test
- on-going recovery actions, include test chamber improvements, more robust Cs filling procedure, Cs feed system improvement for 1-g environment, review of slit geometry / production
- various performance tests
- start of FEEP Lifetime Test in summer 2003, lasting 1.5 years
(2) Complexity of FEEP Thrusters
- total of 12 thrusters
- assembly of 4 emitters per thruster
- total of 16 single-emitter thrusters
- vacuum tight container and Cover Lid
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 56Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table 5-1: Trade Criteria (continued)
Indium-Needle EmitterTechnology
Caesium-Slit Emitter Technology
(3) Complexity of PCU
- total of 12 x 4 = 48 independent emitter supplies are needed for HYPER
- total of 16 x 1 = 16 independent emitter supplies are needed for HYPER
(4) Performance Characteristics
- performance verified by various test campaigns, including thrust balance test at JPL
- "thrust stabilisation" (closed loop) provides significant improvement, compared open loop operation
- performance as verified is well within HYPER requirements
- performance models are well-established and mostly validated by test
- performance within HYPER requirements
(5) Mass
- 48 emitters & PCU channels
- predicted mass of the 12 "thrusters" + 2 PCUs is 57 kg, total
- 16 emitters & PCU channels
- predicted mass for 16 thrusters (8x 2 thrusters clustered) + 4 PCUs is 35 kg, total
(6) Power Consumption
- stand-by operating power is ~ 100 W, total
- power to produced 300 µN, total is ~ 27 W (on top of stand-by power)
- stand-by operating power is ~ 100 W, total
- power to produced 300 µN, total is ~ 20 W (on top of stand-by power)
(7) Heritage
- selected for GOCE (Phase C/D) - baseline in SMART-2 Phase A Study
- supported by several ESA funded programs
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 57Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table 5-1: Trade Criteria (continued)
Indium-Needle EmitterTechnology
Caesium-Slit Emitter Technology
(8) Contamination Protection for Propellant
- minimal - contamination of the very reactive Cs propellant is a critical issue with this technology
- propellant loading only in vacuum or in an inert atmosphere; strong handling constraints. Vacuum-tight emitter container & cover lid mechanisms are needed
- the loaded emitters should not participate in the S/C environmental test program � risk
- very late insertion and / or removal of each emitter assembly from the cluster housing must be possible. Cs loading as late as during launch preparation must be possible. � mobile Cs handling and loading GSE!
- monitoring of propellant contamination is not possible � mission risk (?)
(9) Emitter Assembly Self-contamination
- no problems reported from the test programs
- 1.5 years Lifetime Test will determine, whether there is a risk of self-contamina- tion due to the high volatility of Cs exists or not.
(10) Emitter Start-up / Emitter Geometry Recovery
- Indium micro-droplets accumu- lates on the Extractor Ring, and must be removed approx. every 200 h by heating the Extractor Ring for a few minutes � short non-availability of indivi- dual emitters � emitter performance remains within specified tolerances of the characteristic curve
- Due to the extreme reactivity of Cs with oxygen and water, an initial start up of contaminated emitters must be possible.
- Contamination of the slit emitter must be removable by the start-up process (in orbit)
- Self-contamination or failure to start up is a potential mission risk.
- more test evidence is needed
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 58Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table 5-1: Trade Criteria (continued)
Indium-Needle EmitterTechnology
Caesium-Slit Emitter Technology
(11) S/C Contamination
- Indium has a very low volatility and a higher melting point compared to Cesium.
- Indium sputtering is a feared surface contamination on Solar Arrays and on optical surfaces.
- plume shield limits high-energy beam to 60° half-cone (100%) or less
- plume shield at ground potential; collector ring at - 1 kV to collect charge transfer ions and charged micro-droplets
- test evidence of the contamination at 90° from the beam centre line will be available at end of March 2003 � witness surface from the Exten- ded Endurance Test
- Cs is very volatile
- 90 % of ion beam within 20° x 40°
- test evidence of the contamination outside the beam width also needed for the Cs-Slit emitters � witness surfaces participating in the 1.5 years Lifetime Test
(12) Thruster availability
- approx. every 200 h, the Extractor Rings must be heated for a few minutes, in order to remove accumulated Indium. The HV of the respective emitter must be switched off. Performed sequentially on all 48 emitters
- risk of sustained discharges at higher thrust levels not yet proven to be eliminated.
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 59Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Table 5-2: Trade Criteria (continued)
Indium-Needle EmitterTechnology
Caesium-Slit Emitter Technology
(13) Reliability
- 48 PCU channels
- higher failure tolerance (1 and even 2 failed emitter channels per thruster are tolerable !)
- effect of any first failure is low (soft failure; only loss of one emitters; which can be recovered by operating the remaining emitters at higher thrust level)
- proven reliability of the In-Needle emitters
- 16 PCU channels
- low failure tolerance (1 out of 16 thrusters)
- effect of any first failure is significant (loss of one complete thruster, and thus also of the respective pairs)
- reliable long-term operation not yet verified
(14) Thruster accommodation
- Either 4 clusters of 3 thrusters, each, or 4 x 2 thrusters, plus 4 x 1 thruster, dependent on accommodation constraints
- 2 cut-outs needed at the edge of the Solar Array
- Accommodation constraints require the HYPER thrusters to be arranged in 8 clusters of 2 thrusters, each. SMART-2 cluster design (housing) cannot be reused.
- 4 cut-outs needed at the edge of the Solar Array
- integration of the FEEP emitters into their housing (cluster) shall be possible on the integrated satellite at a late stage � cluster must provide suitable alignment accuracy.
(15) Status of Production Processes
- automatic filling and wetting procedures established
- established quality control procedures for all production processes for the GOCE FEEPs
- difficult production of the slit geometry � critical production process under optimisation
- "Robust" filling procedure, including GSE, under development
astrium GmbH FEEP Feasibility Report HYPER
Doc. No: HYP-5-02 Page 60Issue: 3.0Date: 02/25/2003 File: HYP-5-02_v30final.doc
Name Dep./Comp.
Giorgio Bagnasco ESA/ESTEC
Phil Airey ESA/ESTEC
Ruedeger Reinhard ESA/ESTEC
Ernst Maria Rasel IQO
Philippe Bouyer IOTA
Arnaud Landragin SYRTE
Ulrich Johann Astrium
Walter Fichter Astrium