titanic

8
TITANIC

Upload: khan

Post on 22-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Titanic. The tort of negligence is: doing something that a person using ordinary care would not do, or not doing something that a person using ordinary care would do.  . NEGLIGENCE . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Titanic

TITANIC

Page 2: Titanic

The tort of negligence is:

• doing something that a person using ordinary care would not do, or• not doing something that a person using ordinary care would do. 

NEGLIGENCE

Page 3: Titanic

• means the attention or skill that a reasonable person would use under similar circumstances.  In order to prove negligence we must prove four elements:

Ordinary Care

NEGLIGENCE 1. that there is a duty of care owed to a person;

2. a breach of that duty occurred;

3. there is a reasonably close casual connection that causes injury (proximate cause); and

4. that injury causes actual damage or loss.

Page 4: Titanic

fault by the Plaintiff, which in conjunction with the negligence of Defendant, causes Plaintiff's injury. Any amount of contributory negligence bars recovery, even a minuscule amount of negligence.

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE

Page 5: Titanic

• Fiance•Unsinakble•Hans helped her•Only women & children• $25 a wekk

CARLA CHRISTINE JENSEN'S  INFORMATION

Page 6: Titanic

• Increase the knots for a record• Crucial part of the trip• 1 ice warning, later learned 3

warnings.

• Captain Smith gave order of women & children

• Told Jensen not necessary to help, but accepted it

• Alcohol• Crowd control• Jensen got in and then out of

the boat• Ordered the lowering

SECOND OFFICER LIGHTTOLER

Page 7: Titanic

• Class• “Slight Interruption”• Jensen rash/hanging over• Alcohol• Interferring• Jumped

Page 8: Titanic

1912

• The law applied in this case has some of the aspects of the law of New York during the year of 1912, which is much more pro-company than is today's law. For example contributory negligence is no longer an absolute bar to plaintiff recovering. Most states now use some form of comparative negligence so that negligence by the plaintiff reduces the amount that the plaintiff can recover rather than barring all coverage as happens with contributory negligence.