A GREEN TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTING THE $7.2 TRILLION GLOBAL MARKET

Stronger, Greener, Lower Cost

Tomorrows Building Material Is Here Today!

Problem/Opportunity People around the world have been building houses using the SAME OLD METHODS for hundreds of years.

Wood, Concrete, Brick, and Steel have risen in price yet they all have major limitations. These materials either burn, mold, blow down, rot, crumble in earthquakes, arent very green and can be very expensive.

Most builders are looking for ways to cut costs and increase their marginswhile many consumers want high quality, green buildings.

Problem/Opportunity Continued Titan--Green Building TechnologyTitan walls can resist hurricane 5 force winds and F4 tornadoes. We believe that Titan is stronger, greener, and healthier than all other building materials. In addition, we feel the Titan system is virtually mold proof, fire proof, cheaper, more energy efficient, and offers builders higher margins. Imagine building a home for less but selling it for 8% to 10% more money (studies have shown that green homes typically sell for 8% to 10% more money)*Independent Lab Tested

Titan SolutionTitan may cost as little as $2 per square foot, many estimate that wood costs between $7 and $8 per square foot; while concrete block walls can run $10 to $14 or more per square foot.Titan has signed an LOI to build several homes with one of the top zero energy builders in the country (Houze; they can be found at thezeroenergyhome.com).

Market OpportunityThe market is one of the largest in the world; with the U.S. construction market at $869 billion annually and the global market is $7.2 trillion.

Social Proof

Social Proof Continued

TractionTitan won the largest invention show in the U.S. INPEX, Independent Testing, LOIs, it took over one million dollars to create this new composite / bricks. Its patent pending and Titan buildings have the ability to be LEED and Energy Star certified.

Competitive LandscapeExisting building material companies are already in the space. I.e.. Wood, brick, concrete, steel.however, they are more expensive and have limitations (discussed earlier)Other green material companies are already in the space, however, their cost is typically much HIGHER than the incumbent materials and we feel the chart on the next slide demonstrates that they are also a lower quality material.

Titan Brick vs. Other Materials Comparison Chart

WoodConcrete brickSteelRammed EarthAdobeFired brickSIPSTitan brickFire resistantWater resistantInsect resistantMold & Mildew resistantHigh insulation value/Storm resistantLong lasting/Min skilled labor neededLittle maintenance neededCost less than woodEco manufacturing processGreen productEasily installedSound resistant/Paint bond/Easily tooledCosmetically appealing //

Distribution and SalesManagement expects to receive orders from the following entities:major construction companies big box material supply retailersdistributorsdealersgeneral contractorsgreen energy remodeling contractorsmajor interest from all international marketsexceptional interest from middle east due to lack of wood

5 Year Financial Projections

5 Year Financial Projections

Current Round Raise Amount$4.4 Million Round

Use of FundsPurchase equipment to scale up the current production facility.Pay for additional Certification fees.Working capital.Marketing.

Management TeamThimothy Burroughs, Director of Business DevelopmentVeronica Burroughs, General CounselDon Blalock, CEO. Corey Park, Chairman.

Lanny Park, VP of Training and Implementation

SummaryBuilders could potentially make 64% more on each build job after our 200% markup or possibly 34% more after our 300% markup!Energy savings of up to 60% from a high thermal mass insulation. Titan brick system is only about $1.98 for a sq. ft. of wall. Other building materials average $6-15 for a sq.ft.

Can resist category 5 hurricane wind pressures. Virtually no mold or mildew. Is fireproof to 1,800 degrees. No insect damage and sound resistantIn 2010, the top 10 green builders had a total of 19.852 billion in revenue. In 2012, the same ten companies did over 44.

*