tinea_incognito.pdf

3
Tinea incognito Roberto Arenas, MD a, , Gabriela Moreno-Coutiño, MD a , Lucio Vera, DrSc b , Oliverio Welsh, MD b a Mycology Section, Department of Dermatology, Dr. Manuel Gea GonzalezGeneral Hospital, Calzada de Tlalpan 4800, 14080 México, DF, México b Department of Dermatology, Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez University Hospital, Monterrey, México Abstract Tinea incognito was first described 50 years ago. It is a dermatophytic infection with a clinical presentation modified by previous treatment with topical or systemic corticosteroids, as well as by the topical application of immunomodulators such as pimecrolimus and tacrolimus. Tinea incognito usually resembles neurodermatitis, atopic dermatitis, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, lupus erythematosus, or contact dermatitis, and the diagnosis is frequently missed or delayed. © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. Introduction Tinea corporis is clinically defined as patches of scaly erythema with a slightly elevated border. This picture is representative of most lesions affecting glabrous skin. One of the diagnostic challenges in tinea corporis and tinea capitis is identifying those cases that have been previously mistreated by self-medication or secondary to the use of topical and systemic immunosuppressants, such as steroids and immunomodulators. The term tinea incognito was originally described in 1968 by Ive and Marks in 14 patients with a dermatophytic infection that had an atypical clinical presentation caused by previous treatment with steroids. This occurred in the 1960s after the introduction of these drugs for the topical treatment of diverse dermatologic diseases. Since then, other cases have been described with the topical application of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus, although topical or systemic use of corticosteroids continues to be the most common cause. Over-the-counter access to steroids and other immuno- suppressants in some countries, as well as the increase in medications containing steroids, makes tinea incognito more likely, and therefore, the diagnosis is frequently missed or delayed. These drugs suppress the normal cutaneous immune response to dermatophytes, thus enhancing the development of fungal superficial infections. 1-6 Some physicians, particularly nondermatologists, pre- scribe combinations of steroids and antifungals, such as betamethasone and clotrimazole, in which the betamethasone has a dominant effect over the antifungal agent, thus exacerbating superficial dermatophytosis. 7 As with other dermatophytosis, these infections may involve patients of any age or sex. All areas may be affected, but the face and arms are more prevalent; the feet are rarely affected by this condition, because tinea pedis is an exceptionally missed diagnosis. Clinically, these lesions have a less raised margin and are less scaly than common dermatophytosis. They tend to be Corresponding author. Tel.: + 55 4000 3058; fax: +55 4000 3058. E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Arenas). 0738-081X/$ see front matter © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.011 Clinics in Dermatology (2010) 28, 137139

Upload: phan-ad-rah

Post on 12-Dec-2015

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tinea_incognito.pdf

Clinics in Dermatology (2010) 28, 137–139

Tinea incognitoRoberto Arenas, MDa,⁎, Gabriela Moreno-Coutiño, MDa,Lucio Vera, DrSc b, Oliverio Welsh, MDb

aMycology Section, Department of Dermatology, “Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez” General Hospital,Calzada de Tlalpan 4800, 14080 México, DF, MéxicobDepartment of Dermatology, Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez University Hospital, Monterrey, México

Abstract Tinea incognito was first described 50 years ago. It is a dermatophytic infection with a clinicalpresentation modified by previous treatment with topical or systemic corticosteroids, as well as by thetopical application of immunomodulators such as pimecrolimus and tacrolimus. Tinea incognito usuallyresembles neurodermatitis, atopic dermatitis, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, lupus erythematosus, orcontact dermatitis, and the diagnosis is frequently missed or delayed.© 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Introduction

Tinea corporis is clinically defined as patches of scalyerythema with a slightly elevated border. This picture isrepresentative of most lesions affecting glabrous skin. Oneof the diagnostic challenges in tinea corporis and tineacapitis is identifying those cases that have been previouslymistreated by self-medication or secondary to the use oftopical and systemic immunosuppressants, such as steroidsand immunomodulators.

The term tinea incognito was originally described in 1968by Ive and Marks in 14 patients with a dermatophyticinfection that had an atypical clinical presentation caused byprevious treatment with steroids. This occurred in the 1960safter the introduction of these drugs for the topical treatmentof diverse dermatologic diseases. Since then, other cases havebeen described with the topical application of pimecrolimus

⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: + 55 4000 3058; fax: +55 4000 3058.E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Arenas).

0738-081X/$ – see front matter © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.011

and tacrolimus, although topical or systemic use ofcorticosteroids continues to be the most common cause.

Over-the-counter access to steroids and other immuno-suppressants in some countries, as well as the increase inmedications containing steroids, makes tinea incognito morelikely, and therefore, the diagnosis is frequently missed ordelayed. These drugs suppress the normal cutaneous immuneresponse to dermatophytes, thus enhancing the developmentof fungal superficial infections.1-6

Some physicians, particularly nondermatologists, pre-scribe combinations of steroids and antifungals, such asbetamethasone and clotrimazole, in which the betamethasonehas a dominant effect over the antifungal agent, thusexacerbating superficial dermatophytosis.7

As with other dermatophytosis, these infections mayinvolve patients of any age or sex. All areas may be affected,but the face and arms are more prevalent; the feet are rarelyaffected by this condition, because tinea pedis is anexceptionally missed diagnosis.

Clinically, these lesions have a less raised margin and areless scaly than common dermatophytosis. They tend to be

Page 2: Tinea_incognito.pdf

Fig. 1 Tinea incognito on the upper part of the back.

138 R. Arenas et al.

pustular, pruritic, extensive, and erythematous and maymimic other skin diseases (Figure 1). Another clinical formthat can be confused with bacterial infections or prurigo istrichophytic granuloma (Majocchi granuloma), which ismore commonly found on the legs of women. The funguscan be inoculated by shaving the legs, and a contributingfactor is the use of corticosteroid creams. It is common tofind tinea pedis or onychomycosis in these cases.

The main differential diagnosis depends on the affectedarea. In the face, the lesions may resemble neurodermatitis,atopic dermatitis, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, lupuserythematosus, or contact dermatitis. A recent studyreported that facial tinea incognito is frequently associatedwith tinea pedis or onychomycosis in toenails, or both.8 Inthe glabrous skin, the main differential diagnosis isimpetigo, purpura, lichen planus, psoriasis, erythemamigrans, drug eruptions, Sweet neutrophilic dermatosis,contact dermatitis, discoid lupus, and tuberculoid leprosy.

A 15-year survey from Italy reported 200 cases of tineaincognito. Of these, 9% had folliculitis, and dermatophytidswere uncommon. The source of infection was human-to-human transmission. Among elderly patients, the misdiag-nosis of dermatitis in the legs associated with venous failure,was reported as a common cause of tinea incognito. Up to40% in this series required systemic steroids for treatment ofskin and nondermatologic diseases. For this reason, theauthors underlined the importance of looking for nailalterations, which can indicate onychomycosis, especiallyin chronic forms of tinea incognito.

The clinical history is fundamental, because the clinicalappearance may be confusing. The definitive diagnosis mustbe attained in a mycology laboratory or by an expert indermatomycology using direct examination with potassiumhydroxide, which demonstrates fungal structures. Thespecies must be also identified by culture. Occasionally,the diagnosis is made by histopathology with hematoxylinand eosin and periodic acid-Schiff stains.9,10

The main etiologic agents reported are Trichophytonrubrum, T mentagrophytes, Epidermophyton floccosum,Microsporum canis, M. gypseum, T violaceum, and T erinacei.The first two are most commonly isolated when the face isinvolved.11-33 Fluorinated corticosteroids were implicated in ahospital dermatophytosis outbreak by E floccosum.34

These dermatophytoses usually require systemic treat-ment with oral antifungal agents. Terbinafine, itraconazole,and fluconazole have been shown to be superior to treatmentwith griseofulvin, because they accumulate in the skin.Therapy is generally indicated for 2 weeks, but the clinicaland mycologic responses will determine the definite durationof treatment.35

In renal transplant patients, an uncommon presentation ofatypical tinea is dermatophytic granuloma. The lesionsevolve into chronic dermatophytosis that can clinicallyresemble vasculitis.1

References

1. Arenas R. Atlas dermatología. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. 3rd ed.Mexico: Mc Graw-Hill; 2005. p. 387-91.

2. Ive FA, Marks R. Tinea incognito. Br Med J 1968;3:149-52.3. Solomon BA, Glass AT, Rabbin PE. Tinea incognito and “over-the-

counter” topical potent topical steroids. Cutis 1996;58:295-6.4. Crawford KM, Bostrom P, Russ B, Boyd J. Pimecrolimus-induced tinea

incognito. Skinmed 2004;3:352-3.5. Siddalah N, Erickson O, Miller G, Elston DM. Tacrolimus-induced

tinea incognito. Cutis 2004;73:237-8.6. Grau-Salvat C, Pont Sanjuan V, Sànchez-Carazo JL, Vilata-Corell JJ,

Aliaga-Boniche A. Tiña inflamatoria diseminada: presentación inusual.Rev Iberam Micol 1998;15:100-2.

7. Fisher DA. Adverse effects of topical corticosteroid use. West J Med1995;162:123-6.

8. Nenoff P, Mügge C, Herrmann J, Keller U. Tinea faciei incognito due toTrichophyton rubrum as a result of autoinoculation from onychomy-cosis. Mycoses 2007;50(suppl 2):20-5.

9. Romano C, Maritati E, Gianni C. Tinea incognito in Italy: a 15-yearsurvey. Mycoses 2006;49:383-7.

10. Odom RB, James WD, Berger TG. Andrew's diseases of the skin.Clinical dermatology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000.p. 369-70.

11. Whittle CH. Tinea incognito. Br Med J 1968;3:498.12. Serarslan G. Pustular psoriasis-like tinea incognito due to Trichophyton

rubrum. Mycoses 2007;50:523-4.13. Rallis E, Koumantaki-Mathioudaki E. Pimecrolimus induced tinea

incognito masquerading as intertriginous psoriasis. Mycoses 2008;51:71-3.

14. Ghislanzoni M. Tinea incognito due to Trichophyton rubrumresponsive to topical therapy with isoconazole plus corticosteroidcream. Mycoses 2008;51(suppl 4):39-41.

15. Belhadjali H, Aounallah A, Youssef M, Gorcii M, Babba H, Zili J.Tinea faciei, underrecognized because clinically misleading [in French].Presse Med 2009;38:1230-4.

16. Lange M, Jasiel-Walikowska E, Nowicki R, Bykowska B. Tineaincognito due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycoses 2009 doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01730.x [E-pub].

17. Sánchez-Castellanos ME, Mayorga-Rodríguez JA, Sandoval-Tress C,Hernández-Torres M. Tinea incognito due to Trichophyton mentagro-phytes. Mycoses 2007;50:85-7.

18. McGinness J, Wilson B. Tinea incognito masquerading as granuloma-tous periorificial dermatitis. Cutis 2006;77:293-6.

Page 3: Tinea_incognito.pdf

139Tinea incognito

19. Wacker J, Durani BK, HartschuhW. Bizarre annular lesion emerging astinea incognito. Mycoses 2004;47:447-9.

20. Al Aboud K, Al Hawsawi K, Alfadley A. Tinea incognito on the handcausing a facial dermatophytid reaction. Acta Derm Venereol 2003;83:59.

21. Faegermann J, Fredriksson T, Herczka O, Krupicka P, Björklund KN,Sjövist M. Tinea incognito as a source of an “epidemic” of Tricho-phyton violaceum infections in a dermatologic ward. Int J Dermatol1983;22:39-40.

22. Burkhart CG. Tinea incognito. Arch Dermatol 1981;117:606-7.23. Marks R. Tinea Incognito. Int J Dermatol 1978;17:301-2.24. Elgart ML. Tinea incognito: an update on Majocchi granuloma.

Dermatol Clin 1996;14:51-5.25. Bose SK. Tinea incognito mimicking red face and red ear. J Dermatol

1995;22:706-7.26. Singhi S, Singh G, Pandey SS. Mycologic examination in tinea

incognito. Int J Dermatol 1991;30:376-7.27. Romano C, Asta F, Massai L. Tinea incognito due to Microsporum

gypseum in three children. Pediatr Dermatol 2000;17:41-4.28. Cerroni L. Tinea incognito. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1499.29. Feder Jr HM. Tinea incognito misdiagnosed as erythema migrans.

N Engl J Med 2000;343:69.

30. Nakagawa T, Nakashima K, Takaiwa T, Negayama K. Trichosporoncutaneum (Trichosporon asahii) infection mimicking hand eczema in apatient with leukemia. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:929-31.

31. Gorani A, Schiera A, Oriani A. Case report. Rosacea-like tineaincognito. Mycoses 2002;45:135-7.

32. Pustisek N, Skeriev M, Basta-Juzbasic A, Lipozencic J, MarinovicB, Bukvic-Mokos Z. Tinea incognito caused by trichophytonmentagrophytes—a case report. Acta Dermatovenereol Croat 2001;9:283-6.

33. Jacobs JA, Kolbach DN, Vermeulen AH, Smeets MH, Neuman HA.Tinea incognito due to Trichophyton rubrum after local steroid therapy.Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:142-4.

34. Burry JN. Fluorinated corticosteroids and dermatophytosis. Br Med J1975;3:40.

35. Guenova E, Hoetzencker W, Schaller M, Röcken M, Fierbeck G. Tineaincognito hidden under apparently treatment-resistant pemphigusfoliaceus. Acta Derm Venereol 2008;88:276-7.

36. Arenas R, Vázquez del Mercado E, Molina de Soschin D, Ruiz-Esmenjaud J. Superficial mycoses in renal transplanted patients. Reportof 5 cases and details of one of them with trichophytic granuloma, tineacruris and onychomycosis treated with oral terbinafine. Dermatol Klin2003;5:195-9.