thursday, january 31, 2013
DESCRIPTION
The January 31, 2013 issue of The Brown Daily HeraldTRANSCRIPT
thursday, january 31, 2013 since 1891vol. cxlviii, no. 7
InsIdE
post-taro, django, and networking lingo
Unpopu-lawApplications to law school decline this year
Page 3
Sandy spendingThe Senate passes a bill to increase storm relief funds
Page 5
POST
33 / 18
tomorrow
54 / 26
today
Daily HeraldtHe Brown
By Sam Heft-LutHySenior Staff Writer
Vice President for Research Clyde Bri-ant will be stepping down from his administrative position at the end of the academic year, Provost Mark Schlissel P’15 wrote Wednesday in an email to faculty.
Briant, who served as dean of engi-neering between 2003 and 2006 before joining the administration, will rejoin the engineering faculty at Brown.
A search for his successor is ex-pected to begin sometime next week, Schlissel said, with a goal of naming a new vice president for research by July, which marks the beginning of the next fiscal year.
While serving as vice president, Bri-ant presided over a 35 percent growth in
sponsored research, headed an effort to acquire a supercomputer for the Cen-ter for Computation and Visualization and helped reorganize the structure for protecting faculty-developed patents, among other initiatives, Schlissel wrote.
“Clyde is terrific,” said Beppie Huidekoper, executive vice president for finance and administration. “He’s been a terrific vice president for re-search, and he’s been a great partner. I think it’s just that time in his life where he wants to go back to teaching. It’s a good time with all the transitions going on, and it’s certainly not anything but the most positive.”
Briant said seven years in admin-istration is “a pretty long time” and that he’s ready to pass the torch on to a successor.
“I had always felt I would want to end my career back in engineering,” he said. “I’m very frank about my age. I’m 64 and will turn 65 soon and so it’s a good moment to think about the final years of my career here at Brown. This seemed like a
Vice President for research to step downClyde Briant will leave the administration to return to the engineering faculty starting next year
COurTeSy Of BrOwn univerSiTy
the internal search for a new vice president for research will begin in the coming week as a committee evaluates current senior faculty members.
By aLexander bLumStaff Writer
Rhode Island’s Health Benefits Exchange — the health care marketplace mandated by the 2010 Patient Protection and Af-fordable Care Act — received federal approval Dec. 20, placing it on track to meet the law’s October deadline for being available to the public. “The exchange will be a tool for Rhode
Islanders, small businesses and their employees to
easily compare health insurance options, learn if they qualify for discounts and eventually sign up for other programs,” according to a website set up by the office of Gov. Lincoln Chafee ’75 P ’14.
Though President Obama’s 2010 health care law required the exchange be set up, its implementation was delayed until the Supreme Court upheld the law’s
constitutionality in June 2012. Under the new legislation, every state must either develop its own health care exchange or join a federal exchange.
“Rhode Island has been (at the) cut-ting edge when it comes to the Health Exchange,” said Christine Hunsinger, Chafee’s press secretary.
“Federal funds are supporting the planning, establishment and initial opera-tions of the exchange,” according to his website. An article in Monday’s Boston Globe noted that Rhode Island “has re-ceived $74 million in federal exchange funding.” The state awarded a three-year, $105 million contract to Deloitte Con-sulting to build the exchange and update other aspects of its health care system.
Rhode Island is one of 18 states to build its own health care exchange in-stead of joining the federal government’s.
“This governor believes that Rhode
Island should determine its own destiny,” Hunsinger said. Chafee “believes that he understands his own population better than the federal government does,” she added. But before the health care markets are fully developed, “there is no way to determine the difference between the federal exchange and the Rhode Island Exchange,” Hunsinger said.
After operating for one year with fed-eral support, “the exchange must find a way to raise its own money for staff, supplies and rent,” according to Chafee’s website. The transition to self-sufficiency will present a formidable challenge for the exchange, according to a study by the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council. “The long-term sustainability of (the exchange) depends on a number of factors, including how many individuals access insurance through the exchange,” according to the study.
The number of people who will use the exchange is “the big unknown right now,” said Ashley Denault, RIPEC’s direc-
tor of research. But Chafee is confident the exchange will support itself, and “the early projections say that’s doable and achievable,” Hunsinger said.
Denault said “there are so many questions right now” that it is difficult to predict the costs and revenues.
The exchange will be accessible via phone, in person or online, but Denault said people who are not familiar with health information and technology may be discouraged from using it. An impor-tant factor in the exchange’s success will be whether it is “easily understandable for people at varying levels of health lit-eracy,” she said.
Though she understands this con-cern, Hunsinger said she is confident the exchange will accomplish its goal and “bring in as many people as possible.”
Residents can expect that by October, “the exchange for Rhode Island will be up and running (and) will meet all the federal guidelines,” Hunsinger said.
u.s. signs off on r.I. health care marketplaceThe federally-mandated exchange will serve as a comparison tool for health insurance options
By aLex ConStantinoContributing Writer
Bernice King, CEO of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change, delivered a rousing speech to a packed De Ciccio Family Auditorium in the Salomon Center for the 16th annual Martin Luther King, Jr. Lecture yesterday afternoon. The talk, titled “Advancing the ‘Dream’: Addressing Social Equity Issues to Eliminate Health Disparities in the 21st Century,” focused extensively on the legacies of her parents, Coretta Scott King and Martin Luther King, Jr.
In addition to members of the Brown community, representatives from the
Center for Disease Control and several other universities.
Beginning with a video montage of different speakers reading from Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “Letter from Birming-ham Jail,” the introduction also included a performance by the Shades of Brown a cappella group. In opening remarks, Associate Provost for Academic Devel-opment and Diversity Liza Cariaga-Lo, President Christina Paxson and Provost Mark Schlissel P’15 addressed the idea that despite progress in reducing racial in-equality, much work remains to be done.
When King took the podium, she began with a eulogy for her mother, who passed away seven years ago yesterday. “(My mother) is often lost in the equa-tion when we talk about Martin Luther King,” she said. “When my father died in 1968, he was one of the most hated men in America, and today, he is one of the most loved men in the world.” King cred-ited the shift in
MLK’s daughter speaks on health equalityBernice King discussed her family history, as well as her personal and poltical views
By maxine JoSeLowSenior Staff Writer
Members of the Undergraduate Council of Students raised concerns about po-tential changes to the Diversity Perspec-tives course category and a proposed three-year undergraduate program while showing support for possible sophomore seminars and a five-year undergraduate program.
The council discussed the changes at its meeting Wednesday night in one of the first formal student reactions to interim recommendations released Jan. 25 from the strategic planning com-mittees. The six committees will seek community input before submitting their final reports, the contents of which are expected to influence President Christina Paxson’s agenda for the next several years.
“How (UCS) reacts to these reports will really make a difference,” said Vice President for Campus Life and Student Services Margaret Klawunn, who pre-sented the strategic planning report’s key initiatives to UCS along with Dean of the College Katherine Bergeron. The strategic planning report contains doz-ens of potential initiatives, and council members’ feedback will help determine which half dozen or so will become reality, Klawunn said.
Bergeron pinpointed renaming and reevaluating
uCs responds to interim reportsThe council discussed new curricular programs and 3- and 5-year undergrad programs
ruBa aleryani/ Herald
bernice King addressed a large crowd that included students from Harvard, yale, Penn, Johns Hopkins university and tougaloo College.
/ / VP page 2
/ / King page 3
city & state
/ / uCS page 5
university news2 THE BROWN DAILy HERALDTHURSDAy, JANUARy 31, 2013
2:30 P.M.
A Reading by Kate Bernheimer
McCormac Family Center
4 P.M.
Clapp Lecture: Carol Robinson
MacMillan 117
1 P.M.
Auditions for BTV Short Films
Wilson 102
7:30 P.M.
Qualifying Poetry Slam
Smitty-B 106
SHARPE REFECTORY VERNEY-WOOLLEY
LunCH
dinner
Marinated Beef with Au Jus, Baked Potatoes with Sour Cream, Red Potato Frittata, Pesto Tortellini Salad
Cajun Pasta with Chicken, Vegan Paella, Yellow Beets Roasted with Red Onion, BBQ Navy Beans
Hot Turkey Sandwich with Gravy, Fresh Broccoli, Vegetable Bean Stew
BBQ Beef Sandwich, Butternut Squash Ravioli with Sage Cream Sauce, Peanut Butter Sandwich Bar
TOdAY jANuARY 31 TOMORROW FEbRuARY 1
C r o S S W o r d
S u d o k u
m e n u
C a l e n d a r
Shefali Luthra, PresidentLucy Feldman, Vice President
Samuel Plotner, TreasurerJulia Kuwahara, Secretary
The Brown Daily Herald (USPS 067.740) is an independent newspaper serving the Brown University community daily since 1891. It is published Monday through Friday during the academic year, excluding vacations, once during Commencement and once during Orientation by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. Single copy free for each member of the community. POSTMASTER please send corrections to P.O. Box 2538, Providence, RI 02906. Periodicals postage paid at Providence, R.I. Subscription prices: $280 one year daily, $140 one semester daily. Copyright 2013 by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.browndailyherald.com195 angell st., Providence, r.I.
EdItorIaL(401) 351-3372
BusInEss(401) 351-3260
By aParaaJit SriramSenior Staff Writer
The popular notion that Turkey is a model democracy is incorrect, Nukhet Sandal, postdoctoral fellow at the Wat-son Institute for International Stud-ies, argued in a research presentation Wednesday
Sandal presented her research — concerning differential treatment of religious minorities in Turkey — to about 30 scholars and students at the institute’s Birkelund Boardroom yes-terday. The talk was the first in a series of luncheon seminars sponsored by the Middle East Studies department and filled the room over capacity.
Sandal, who was raised in Turkey, spent 20 minutes giving her presen-tation, titled “Public Theologies of Citizenship in the Middle East: Revis-iting the Turkish Model.” She began by describing some of the religious rifts that exist today in Turkey, from ethno-religious conflicts between the Muslim majority and Christian minority to the dissemination of pamphlets by religious institutions offering commentary on the ques-tion “Who is a Turkish citizen?” She framed her presentation by arguing that, even in a purportedly secular state like Turkey, “public theologies” — religiously animated attempts at addressing broader societal ques-tions — arise and define boundaries between “citizens” and “non-citizens,” leading to conflict.
In her analysis, Sandal explained four “dimensions” that make up public theologies — the substantive, spiritual, spatial and temporal — and
acknowledged her potential for bias, having grown up in a mostly secu-lar family. Religious minorities — mainly different sects of Christians — do not receive equal treatment, she said, highlighting the tacit conviction that despite Turkey’s facade of plural-ism, Muslims can legitimately claim to be “the highest category” of citizens. Under the Ottoman millet system, which was supposed to protect reli-gious minority subjects of the Otto-man Empire, political leadership only dealt with religious leaders instead of with full civil societies.
“That system cannot work any-more,” Sandal said. “These (minority) populations do not get along with each other now.”
Touching on contemporary poli-tics, she argued that issues like Tur-key’s attempts to join the European Union and the rise of Kurdish nation-alism have displaced attention from these longstanding issues of citizen-ship and nationhood. “Christians are happier now,” she said, but this senti-ment belies rifts that persist and result in sporadic hate crimes.
“There is an embedded public the-ology,” she said, citing “textbooks, laws, the practices of people through their lives,” as contributing factors in this phenomenon. When pressed
on this issue during a question-and-answer period following the presen-tation, she identified “the Ottoman understanding of nationhood” and the “Neo-Ottoman dream of governance and foreign policy” — a reference to the expansive Ottoman empire once centered in Turkey — as reasons the public theology has persisted.
The talk prompted many questions from professors, probing Sandal’s re-search and offering comparative cases that might be illustrative. Professor of Political Science Ashutosh Varshney proposed Sandal’s research could be distilled into the question “Who owns the nation?”, a question he said played out in conflicts like the Sri Lankan civil war.
The formality of the talk receded during the questions period — San-dal joked about “doing field research” while going to the salon, and a profes-sor prodding Sandal for clarity added that she did so “because we’re friends and I care.”
Despite her findings, Sandal said she was optimistic about Turkey’s fu-ture. “I don’t know how the process will be, but things have to change.”
“How can we create the most in-clusive societies in the shortest time?” she asked. “It may require some sac-rifices, but change will come.”
seminar explores conflict in turkeyA Watson fellow cites rifts between Muslims and Christians as a key obstacle to pluralism
MerOn TadeSSe/ Herald
in the first of several watson middle east seminars, nukhet Sandal argued Christian minorities in turkey face discrimination.
good moment to go back to engineer-ing.”
In addition to his personal con-siderations, Briant said his decision was partly motivated by the current transitional period in the University’s presidency.
“The president is taking on a lot of new initiatives that are very excit-ing,” he said. “It’s probably good to have someone in here that will start out at the beginning and play a big role in that.”
More senior administrators have been stepping down recently than is usual, in part because a university presi-dent’s exit often spurs administrative
turnover, Schlissel said.“People often use that as a reason
why they want to go back to doing their regular work,” Schlissel said. “None of these folks was asked to step down — certainly I would have been happy if they had continued — but it’s more the sort of natural turnover of these positions as people naturally retire or go back to being a professor.”
Briant works primarily in the field of mechanical engineering and said he plans to finish off his career in teach-ing and research. Last semester, he co-taught ENGN 0030: “Introduction to Engineering.”
“It was really good to get back in the classroom, and I remembered how
much I enjoyed that,” he said.The Provost’s office will be leading
the internal search for Briant’s succes-sor.
“The plan is to initially see whether any of our existing senior faculty are interested in the job and appropriate for it,” Schlissel said. “We’ll look inter-nally first, and if we don’t find the right person, then we may look outside (the University).”
“In this instance, there’s a very large advantage for a faculty member who actually is very familiar with a broad array of what the Brown faculty do for their research,” he added. “A big part of the job is helping find ways to sup-port and stimulate research and build interdisciplinary programs. An outside person might be quite good at this, but they would have a very steep learning curve.”
Paxson said she hopes Briant’s suc-cessor will help the University expand its role in new, innovative fields.
“We need somebody who really un-derstands research and who can play an important role in bringing groups of researchers together,” she said. “This position is sort of a broker, somebody who’s pulling the community together and figuring out what opportunities there are for research and especially for research funding and matching us up with people. … We need someone who can take what Clyde’s done and carry it forward.”
/ / VP page 1
university news 3THE BROWN DAILy HERALDTHURSDAy, JANUARy 31, 2013
Judge rules in dui hit-and-run
a woman who was convicted of injuring two students in a hit-and-run in spring 2011 was sentenced to one year in a minimum-security prison followed by two years of house arrest.
rhode island resident Jessica Paden pleaded guilty to drunk driving among other charges.
The students, Julia unanue Banuchi ’14 and amanda Chew ’14, were struck on the corner of Hope and Charlesfield streets at around 10:45 p.m. in april 2011, The Herald reported at the time. unanue Banuchi sustained a leg fracture and Chew suffered from a concussion.
Paden apologized to the victims in court and will work as a tutor for fellow inmates during her sentence. She will lose her driver’s license for two years after she leaves prison.
— Emily Boney
n e w S i n B r i e fpublic perception to her mother’s efforts to establish the King Center and a federal holiday in his name.
King’s remarks centered on the theme of unity between all races. “I believe we are all related, and we are all a little dys-functional,” she said, noting that humans share 99 percent of their DNA.
King spent the rest of her speech dis-cussing issues of health care and poverty. She called health issues the most harmful form of racial inequality.
“Not all communities have benefited” from medical advancements, King said, noting the high concentration of conve-nience stores, fast food restaurants and liquor stores in impoverished neighbor-hoods. She referenced statistics showing racial disparities in medical issues like HIV, substance abuse and stress and so-cial issues like incarceration, education, employment and internet access.
King identified poverty as the un-derlying social issue that policy should address. “We must escalate the war on poverty wherever it occurs,” she said.
King’s parents believed health care should be universal, she said. King com-mended the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act but said it did not go far enough. “We must set higher stan-dards,” she said.
King also discussed recent mass shootings, calling violence a large pub-lic health problem. She said she supports bans on assault weapons and high-capac-ity ammunition and shared an anecdote from her childhood. After her house was bombed in an assassination attempt on her father, he calmed an armed mob seeking revenge for the attack, saying, “We are going to fight this another way because he who lives by the sword will perish by the sword.”
She suggested restricting violent me-dia including video games, likening them to sugary products that parents should limit in their child’s diet.
King concluded with the final line from her father’s “I Have a Dream” speech: “Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, we are free at last.”
King’s speech was followed by a question-and-answer period, a signifi-cant portion of which King spent ad-dressing her views on gay and lesbian equality. King said though she does not hate the LGBTQ community, her first responsibility is to her religious views. “The family was created and ordained first and foremost by God,” she said. King has publicly opposed gay marriage in the past, a point on which she said she disagreed with her mother. During her answer, King said many people are gay if they “delved into it as an experiment,” though some are gay due to a “genuine birthing experience.”
The event concluded with a perfor-mance of “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” by Shades of Brown.
By gadi CoHenStaff Writer
The numbers of law school applicants and total applications submitted nation-wide decreased for the second year in a row, according to a Law School Admis-sions Council report released last year.
The percent of individuals applying for fall 2013 admission to law school fell by 13.7 percent nationwide. Com-paratively, in fall 2011, the last year with available data, Brown students and alums applying to law school de-creased by 24 percent. The University does not yet have data on the number of Brown applicants for fall 2012 or fall 2013 admission.
The number of total applications for fall 2013 admission to law school nationwide fell by 12.5 percent. This year’s smaller pool of applications could bolster the admission chances for Brown students seeking acceptance to law school.
The report confirmed concerns about the path to law school that have arisen since the 2008 economic reces-sion. Critics have pointed to the finan-cial risk of attending law school at a time when job prospects remain low, leading some to reconsider their law school plans. Only 55 percent of stu-dents who graduated from law schools in 2011 nationwide had secured long-term jobs in the legal profession, ac-cording to data from the American Bar Association.
The percent of Brown students and alums applying to law school who have been accepted has been rising in recent years, said George Vassilev, director of pre-professional advising and assistant dean of the College. Of Brown students and alums who applied to law school during the fall 2011 admissions cycle, 91 percent were admitted into at least one school, a rate 20 percent higher than the national average.
“Students and alumni have been much more methodical about exam-ining their personal and professional goals,” Vassilev said, adding that he be-lieves Brown students should reflect on their options before making post-graduate commitments.
Vassilev wrote in a follow-up email to The Herald that the number of law school applications from the University has corresponded to national trends in recent years. The number of Brown students and alums who applied to law school for fall 2010 admission, for instance, rose 33 percent from the
previous year, which was linked to a nationwide increase in law school ap-plications as more students sought out advanced degrees in the face of a dif-ficult economy, Vassilev wrote.
Just over 200 Brown students and al-ums submitted law school applications for fall 2011 admission, a total that Vas-silev wrote is “more typical of Brown’s law school applicant population.” He added that the 24 percent decrease from the previous year at Brown followed the national trend of declining applications.
Since becoming the head of pre-professional advising in 2010, Vassilev has implemented some changes in the University’s advising services for law school with the goal of helping stu-dents better understand the application process.
“One of the first things we did was to reframe the way we deliver advice to students,” Vassilev said, noting that his office used to be centered more on aca-demic advising. He said he worked with the Center for Careers and Life After Brown to provide students with better information about law career options.
As part of this goal, Vassilev helped construct a new law careers advising website to provide information on mul-tiple aspects of law school preparation. The website offers statistics about the admission process, describes differ-ent fields in the legal profession and lists upcoming law-related events on campus.
Vassilev said the University’s efforts to provide more information to pro-spective law school applicants reflects one encouraging change brought on by the new dynamics of the admissions cycle.
“There’s been a lot more transpar-ency among law schools these days,” Vassilev said, adding that applicants are better informed about the admis-sion process after criticism that law schools withheld too much information from prospective students. “Before, law schools found themselves in a very chal-lenging position about being forthright with applicants.”
Students indicated they are weigh-ing the costs of attending law school in the midst of continuing struggles in the legal job market.
“For a while I thought I wasn’t go-ing to think about law school,” Hannah Begley ’15 said. “It’s scary to see how few people end up with jobs even from top-three schools and how hard it is to get six-figure salaries, even with six-figure debts.”
Begley expressed hope that a smaller applicant pool will signal to law schools that their price tags are inflated. She said she believes law schools may lower tuition costs as they witness a decline in demand among prospective students.
Though Begley sees the decline in applicants as a sign that students are growing increasingly aware of the costs of attending law school, she said that she still wants to apply to law school once she graduates. She said she hopes the number of applications will continue to decline so she can gain advantage from a smaller applicant pool with lower Law School Admission Test scores.
“If that trend continues, the number of applicants getting high scores will probably be lower,” Begley said. “So, hopefully, my shot of getting into a good school will be higher.”
Students considering law school indicated concern about the costs but said they plan to finance their education with grants, fellowships and scholar-ships.
“Many students are wondering whether it’s worth it for them to take out a big loan for such a career,” Cindy Abarca ’16 said. “But there are always scholarships available and ways you can get support.”
Despite being a first-year, Abarca said she has already begun exploring legal career options. She said she has attended several law school information sessions on campus and has already interned with a law firm that provides her with a scholarship to help finance her education at Brown.
Law school application rates declineThe high expense of attending law school in a risky economic climate may be to blame
/ / King page 1
city & state4 THE BROWN DAILy HERALDTHURSDAy, JANUARy 31, 2013
By emiLy boneySenior Staff Writer
Gov. Lincoln Chafee ’75 P’14 P’16 received generally positive reactions from academics and officials for his proposals to cut the corporate tax rate and tentatively cap tuition at the state’s public colleges and universities in the Jan. 17 State of the State address.
Presenting his third budget to the General Assembly, Chafee asked for “no increase in taxes, fees or charges of any kind” on individuals or busi-nesses, adding that the corporate tax rate should be lowered from 9 to 7 percent — a lower rate than both Con-necticut’s and Massachusetts’.
Speaker of the House Gordon Fox, D-Providence, told WPRI that he thinks the budget “is a great starting point,” but added that “the devil’s al-ways in the details in terms of lowering the corporate tax ... so until we get into the weeds and see how it all balances, we will hold further comment.”
House Minority Leader Brian New-berry, R-North Smithfield, told WPRI that he was “certainly happy about the lack of any taxes or fee increases” and supports “the idea of cutting the corporate tax.” He added that it was “an improvement over the last two budgets.”
“This is by far the best thing Gov. Chafee has done since he’s been in office,” said Leonard Lardaro, a profes-
sor of economics at the University of Rhode Island. He added that he thinks the budget will support long-term in-vestment in Rhode Island’s economy. “It’s not an instantaneous thing ... but if these are implemented, we’re definitely starting to move in the right direction.”
Lardaro praised Chafee’s proposals but argued that if the state passes the budget, it will be at risk of running a deficit. Politicians are supposed to present balanced budgets, but “this one is a little optimistic on revenue,” he said.
Recent data show revenue from state income and sales taxes is on the rise and expected to keep rising. But Lardaro said analysts may be predict-ing too great an increase. He added that he thinks Chafee might be cre-ating a challenge for future leaders who will have to make cuts in order to balance the budget.
Rhode Island should also explore other policies that will help it stay competitive with neighboring states, Lardaro said. Massachusetts may be lowering its sales tax rate, he said, add-ing that “we have to assume that other states are going to keep competing.”
Chafee attributed Rhode Island’s high business operating costs to some of the largest local property taxes in the nation, proposing “an additional $30 million dollars in property tax relief ” to combat the tax burden. He said the money would go to the cities
and towns themselves to disincentivize tax increases as well as to fund infra-structure upkeep.
Cranston Mayor Allan Fung told WPRI he applauds Chafee “for the recognition of the need for help for the cities and towns, particularly in light of the significant drastic cuts that we’ve had to achieve over the past sev-eral years.”
In an effort to make college more affordable, Chafee proposed a $6 mil-lion increase in funding for higher education to help stave off tuition in-creases at URI, the Community Col-lege of Rhode Island and Rhode Island College, as long as the schools make $6 million worth of budget cuts to “meet
(him) halfway.” Lardaro said that though this bud-
get was Chafee’s “best” yet, he did not think the governor put “adequate em-phasis on the role of higher education in moving the state forward.”
“Our most glaring deficiency is the lack of skill in our labor force,” Lardaro said. Chafee did not provide the $14 million state higher education institu-tions had requested to keep tuition costs level and enable them to train tomorrow’s workforce, he said.
Rhode Island is trying to move toward knowledge production and away from manufacturing but will not be able to do so without significant increases to higher education fund-ing, Lardaro said. Rhode Island was the 16th best state in the nation for innovative technology-based econo-mies, according to the 2010 State New Economy Index.
Commissioner of Higher Educa-tion for the State of Rhode Island Ray Di Pasquale had a more positive reac-tion to the proposed funding, Special Assistant to the Commissioner Mike Trainor said in an interview with Rhode Island Public Radio. Trainor
said the commissioner thought the budget exemplified “a continuation of (Chafee’s) three year trend now to re-verse the hemorrhaging of state aid to public higher education that occurred under the prior administration.”
Chafee also proposed adding $30.3 million to public education and $14 million to vocational schools on top of the funds required by a state education formula , said Elliot Krieger, executive assistant for communications at the Rhode Island Department of Elemen-tary and Secondary Education. The formula is based on district capacity, student aid and the district’s financial need. While some of the additional funds are going to districts in need, some will go toward special needs edu-cation, career technology education and early childhood education, among other projects, Krieger said. If Chafee’s budget passes, Rhode Island “will have invested $115 million in public K-12 and higher education” over the past three years, he added.
“The world sees us as a caricature: ‘What Not to Do,’” Lardaro said. “This is something I hope the politics don’t dominate and the economics do.”
r.I. officials praise Chafee’s proposed budget planIf the budget passes, the state will see no new taxes, and corporate taxes will decrease
Herald file PhotoChafee proposed additional funds to public schools, colleges and universities in an effort to improve the economy.
city & state 5THE BROWN DAILy HERALDTHURSDAy, JANUARy 31, 2013
By emiLy boneySenior Staff Writer
The U.S. Senate passed a bill Jan. 28 al-locating $50.5 billion of aid to facilitate reconstruction in states affected by Hurricane Sandy last October.
Three months later, the East Coast is still recovering from Sandy, which left wreckage and destruction in Rhode Island’s coastal areas. The state requested additional assistance for housing insurance after $10 million of initial emergency funds were allocated to repair highways and infrastructure.
The funding “will help Rhode Is-land communities hurt by Hurricane Sandy to rebuild,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., in a press release.
Rhode Island’s congressmen voiced frustration about the Republican cau-cus’ inaction.
Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., wrote that Republican leaders are “incompre-hensible and irresponsible” for not responding quickly to alleviate suf-
fering for victims in a tweet Jan. 2.Reed was one of the main advo-
cates of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations bill.
Rhode Islanders are ready to make repairs and rebuild their lives, but lack the necessary funds to do so, he said in an interview with WPRI.
The amount of aid appropriated to Rhode Island will not be determined until President Obama signs the legis-lation into law, said Richard Luchette, communications director for Rep. Da-vid Cicilline ’83, D-R.I.
The bill’s language currently allo-cates funds to various governmental departments, with the largest amounts of funding going toward roadway re-construction, flood control, housing restoration and transit line rehabili-tation.
Luchette said the fight for addi-tional funding was long and grueling but added that passage in the Senate is a victory worth celebrating. “This was the culmination of the efforts (of Rhode Island legislators). ... It’s long overdue.”
He added that in a time of crisis, it is important for Republicans and Democrats to “set aside their differ-ences and work together.”
senate passes relief bill for sandy damage Rhode Island will receive an as-of-yet undetermined portion of the $50.5 billion of aid
Same-sex marriageThe rhode island House overwhelmingly approved a bill last Thursday that would make rhode island the
10th state to legalize same-sex marriage. The bill now goes to the Senate — the branch of the General assembly historically less supportive of same-sex marriage — where its fate remains unclear. Senate President Teresa Paiva-weed, d-newport, who personally opposes same-sex marriage legislation, has promised to allow a committee to vote on the bill but has not provided a timetable for action.
a breakdown of senator support for same-sex marriage yesterday by the Providence Journal revealed an evenly-divided body. rhode island has 39 senators, so the bill’s advocates need to secure 20 votes to ensure the bill’s passage — assuming all members vote. The Journal counted 11 senators co-sponsoring a bill to legalize same-sex marriage and 11 others co-sponsoring a bill that would call for a voter referendum to amend the state constitution to define marriage as “the lawful union of one man and one woman.”
The Journal article explained that co-sponsoring a bill did not ensure that senator’s support for the given issue. rep. william San Bento Jr., d-Pawtucket, voted against the same-sex marriage bill in the House but was a co-sponsor. He told the Journal he only co-sponsored the bill so it would be heard and voted on in committee.
Of the remaining 17 senators, the Journal found “four leaning in favor of same-sex marriage and four who oppose it.”
‘Katie’s Law’State Sen. david Bates, r-Barrington, and rep. Brian Patrick Kennedy, d-Hopkinton, introduced legislation
that would require collecting dna from all individuals arrested for a broad set of violent crimes. in honor of Katie Sepich, who was murdered in new Mexico in 2003 — a crime the woman’s parents believe could have been solved sooner if dna tests had been mandated by law — the bill has been named “Katie’s law.”
Similar legislation has been introduced and adopted in states around the country. President Obama signed a federal version of “Katie’s law” Jan. 10.
under the proposed law, officers would take dna samples from any individuals arrested for the variety of violent crimes included in the legislation, but — like fingerprints — would delete the data from the system if they were acquitted.
business collaboration The rhode island Public expenditure Council and the rhode island economic development Corporation
joined with both branches of the General assembly to create a database “for tracking business-related legislation in the 2013 legislative session,” according to a state press release. Officials designed the database to help rhode islanders, the business community and legislators keep track of pending legislation related to “tax structure, regulatory climate, public safety and economic development,” according to the press release. Gov. lincoln Chafee ’75 P’14 said he believes the collaboration will show businesses that rhode island is actively working toward making the state more welcoming to business.
By adaM TOOBin, CiTy & STaTe ediTOrSPOTliGHT On THe STaTe HOuSe
the Diversity Perspectives course cat-egory as one key initiative that emerged
from the strategic planning process. “The defini-tion right now is something we
worked on 10 years ago, so it doesn’t reflect current scholarship right now,” Bergeron said.
The strategic planning committees considered changing the term Diver-sity Perspectives to “Social Justice,” but ultimately decided the new terminol-ogy would deter many students with its connotations of activism, she said.
The committees also considered making Diversity Perspectives courses a requirement comparable to the Writing
Requirement, but “didn’t want to add too many requirements to the Brown curriculum, or else we’d end up looking like some other schools,” Klawunn said.
Instead of creating a Diversity Per-spectives requirement, the committees considered adding a question to the concentration form about whether stu-dents have made diversity a part of their education, Klawunn said.
Holly Hunt ’13, UCS general body member, said the University must re-member the term diversity is often used as a euphemism when discussing race, whereas in reality the term encompasses other aspects of a person besides race, such as socioeconomic status.
Maahika Srinivasan ’15, UCS Cor-poration liaison, said the University should work on extending Diversity Perspectives courses from the humani-
ties to the sciences. “There are tons of biology classes that introduce (diver-sity) in a biological context,” and these courses might as well have the Diversity Perspectives designation, Srinivasan said.
Council members raised qualms about a proposed three-year undergrad-uate program. The three-year program would benefit students who struggle to afford four years at the University, those who have taken a gap year and those who have taken college courses before enrolling at Brown, Bergeron said.
“It would be really hard to enter a class where people have already made friends,” said Kiera Peltz ‘16. “I know I wouldn’t trade my freshman year ex-perience for anything.”
“I’m not sure a potential employer would think someone with a three-year
degree would really be ready for the job market,” said Abigail Braiman ’15, chair of the Committee for Admissions and Student Services.
Though the proposed three-year plan came under attack by council members, the five-year plan received more support. Council members said they appreciated the intent of the five-year program, which was to support students who sought to “interrupt their time on College Hill to do meaningful activities” such as jobs, internships or community service, Bergeron said. “So yes to the five-year plan and no to the three-year plan,” Klawunn said in sum-mary of UCS sentiment.
A proposal for sophomore semi-nars also received support from council members. Sophomore seminars would cater to second-years who were unable
to take a first-year seminar but desired a smaller classes, Klawunn said. A pro-posed group of sophomore seminars called Randall seminars would explore issues of diversity and would “pull a number of students in who aren’t nec-essarily interested in those issues” with their appealing small size, Klawunn said.
“I think it’s a great idea to introduce students very early in their Brown ca-reer (to diversity issues), especially at a critical point when they’re about to de-clare their concentration,” said Anthony White ’13, UCS president. “It would be a great alternative to requiring students take these courses,” White added.
The strategic planning commit-tees will continue to seek feedback from UCS at its forums in the future, Bergeron said.
/ / uCS page 1
www.browndailyherald.com
University news
editorial6 THE BROWN DAILy HERALDTHURSDAy, JANUARy 31, 2013
C O R R E C T I O N S P O L I C yThe Brown Daily Herald is committed to providing the Brown University community with the most accurate information possible. Corrections may be submitted up to seven calendar days after publication.
C O M M E N TA R y P O L I C yThe editorial is the majority opinion of the editorial page board of The Brown Daily Herald. The editorial viewpoint does not necessarily reflect the views of The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. Columns, letters and comics reflect the opinions of their authors only.
L E T T E R S T O T H E E D I T O R P O L I C ySend letters to [email protected]. Include a telephone number with all letters. The Herald reserves the right to edit all letters for length and clarity and cannot assure the publication of any letter. Please limit letters to 250 words. Under special circumstances writers may request anonymity, but no letter will be printed if the author’s identity is unknown to the editors. Announcements of events will not be printed.
A D V E R T I S I N G P O L I C yThe Brown Daily Herald, Inc. reserves the right to accept or decline any advertisement at its discretion.
e d i to r i a l C a r to o n b y a n g e l i a w a n g
“when he died in 1968, my father was one of the
most hated men in america, and today, he is one of
the most loved men in the world.”— Bernice King
See king on page 1.
e d i to r i a lUnder current policy, international, transfer and Resumed Undergraduate
Education students are admitted on a need-aware basis, in which ability to pay is considered in deciding whether students should be admitted. While financial aid is a familiar issue, as President Christina Paxson begins to shape her agenda, now is the time to bring it to the forefront of campus dialogue. We strongly advocate making full need-blind admission the administration and student body’s top priority during the coming years.
Last Friday, Paxson emailed members of the Brown community with interim reports whose recommendations could ultimately shape her agenda. These recommendations included attracting and supporting “an excellent, diverse and global student body” and developing “signature academic initiatives that contribute in significant ways to challenges that confront society.” But fulfilling these objectives is simply not possible without making our community acces-sible to the multitude of students discouraged from or unable to apply to the university because of their need-aware status.
In its interim report, the Committee on Financial Aid concluded that “Brown’s reputation and quality of community are diminished to the extent that we do not make ourselves fully available to the best and brightest of students.” The current policy creates a dichotomy between need-blind and need-aware students, which is detrimental to internal student body relations, the University’s global reputation and the diversity of the community as a whole. Being need-aware for select groups punishes them for circumstances beyond their control. As a result, the community suffers from a lack of diversity that curtails student discussion.
The report concluded recommending a need-blind admissions policy that extends to all students. Suggestions for implementing this have been researched and presented by Brown for Financial Aid, a student-run organization com-mitted to the establishment of need-blind admissions for all students and increased transparency on Brown’s financial aid policy. BFA has issued a set of recommendations that include an “aid-centered capital campaign” that would encourage donors to fund scholarships, as well increasing the amount of the Annual Fund “internally earmarked for financial aid.” Innovative fundraising drives and working in tandem both with current students and alums to generate ideas and support for stronger aid programs could be strong new pathways to finding a solution to Brown’s current need-blind quandary.
This commitment is essential when viewed in the context of Brown’s role as an Ivy League institution. Harvard, Princeton and yale all extend need-blind admission to international students, while UPenn and Cornell offer limited financial aid. We hope endowment and not intent is what constrains Brown. But the cost of a need-aware policy is significant. Because Brown has not dedicated the resources to helping certain types of students, it cannot continue attracting the best and brightest that those groups have to offer. This results in several consequences for the University: lost potential students, future alums less willing to give back to the school and a tarnished image as an institution unable to achieve the ideals it espouses. Certainly, it will be more damaging than not renovating dormitories.
We need commitment and action from the administration to create an in-clusivefinancial aid policy. If Brown wants to improve upon the diverse, equal, passionate community it has cultivated for so long. Our education should and must be accessible to everyone. Otherwise, everyone, regardless of financial situation, loses out.
Editorials are written by The Herald’s editorial page board: its editor, Dan Jeon, and its members, Mintaka Angell, Samuel Choi, Nicholas Morley and Rachel Occhiogrosso. Send comments to [email protected].
q u ot e o f t h e d ay
Calling for financial fairness
facebook.com/browndailyherald @the_herald browndailyherald.com
the brown daily herald
hannah abelowmaddie bergSona mkrttchianadam toobinelizabeth kohalison SilverSahil luthrakate nussenbaumJames blumConnor grealymathias helleralexandra macfarlaneeli okundan Jeonmatt brundagelucas hustedmaggie tennis
emily gilbertSam kaseSydney mondrytom Sullivandanny garfieldangelia Wang
Photo EditorPhoto EditorPhoto EditorPhoto EditorVideo Editor
Ilustrations Editor
MultiMedia
BuSiNeSS
Sara Palasitsbrisa bodelleinat brennerkyle mcnamaraSandra yanJoseph Steinneal Poole
ProductionCopy Desk Chief
Design EditorDesign EditorDesign Editor
Assistant Design Editor Web Producer
Assistant Web Producer
ediTORiAL
Arts & Culture EditorArts & Culture Editor
City & State EditorCity & State Editor
Features EditorFeatures Editor
Science & Research EditorScience & Research Editor
Sports EditorSports Editor
University News EditorUniversity News EditorUniversity News Editor
Editorial Page EditorOpinions EditorOpinions EditorOpinions Editor
editors-in-chief
lucy feldmanShefali luthra
senior editors
aparna bansalalexa Pugh
Managing editors
elizabeth CarrJordan hendricks
BLOG dAiLY HeRALdmeredith bilskiWilliam JanoverConnor mcguiganCara newlongeorgia tollinJason hu
Editor-in-ChiefManaging Editor
Deputy Managing EditorDeputy Managing EditorDeputy Managing Editor
Creative Director
general Managers
Julia kuwaharaSamuel Plotner
office Manager
Shawn reilly
directorseliza Cooganluka ursicemily Chuangel leeJustin lee
ManagersJacqueline Changleslie Chenanisa holmesWenli ShaoCarolyn StichnothChae SuhWilliam barkeleynicole ShimerJosh ezicksonalison Pruzanmelody Caoowen millard
SalesFinance
Alumni RelationsBusiness Strategy
Business Development
Regional SalesRegional SalesRegional SalesRegional SalesRegional SalesRegional Sales
CollectionsCollectionsOperations
Alumni EngagementHuman Resources
Research & Development
POST- MAGAziNeZoë hoffmanClaire luchette
Editor-in-Chief Editor-in-Chief
sections
greg Jordan-detamore Strategic Director
Due to an editing error, an article in Wednesday’s Herald (“Expanding engineering school considers off-campus space,” Jan. 30) incorrectly referred to Iris Bahar as an associate professor of engineering. In fact, Bahar is a professor of engineer-ing. The Herald regrets the error.
Co r r e C t i o n
An article in Wednesday’s Herald (“Study investigates marijuana dependence,” Jan. 30) had a headline suggesting the study described was researching marijuana dependence. Though the study was part of a larger research project examin-ing dependence, it specifically did not address that topic. Additionally, the story’s caption said marijuana users perceive their addiction in a different manner from observers. In fact, the study did not investigate perceptions of addiction. The Herald regrets the error.
C l a r i f i C at i o n a n d Co r r e C t i o n
opinions 7THE BROWN DAILy HERALDTHURSDAy, JANUARy 31, 2013
Everyone seems to understand grade infla-tion to be real and to be a problem. Web-sites are devoted to tracking the average grade point averages at colleges and uni-versities and shaming the universities that the sites’ owners consider to be the worst offenders. Last year, the Brown Conversa-tion devoted discussion to the perceived ease of earning an A at Brown. Proponents of the grade inflation hypothesis cite many causes — from the increasingly commer-cial nature of higher education to moral de-cline among America’s students to affirma-tive action — for the observed increase in average grade point averages that they term grade inflation. The observed trend in in-creased grades is real, but there is reason to believe the trend is a byproduct of positive changes at America’s colleges and univer-sities and should be celebrated as evidence these changes have been successful.
Well-known critics of grade inflation, such as Harvard professor Harvey Mansfield, attribute grade inflation to increased racial and ethnic diversity in America’s institutions of higher education, arguing that grade infla-tion arose from a desire among college fac-ulty members to avoid being perceived as racist or bigoted for assigning deservedly low grades to unqualified beneficiaries of affirma-tive action. There is reason to believe average
grades have increased as a result of increased diversity in the student bodies of colleges and universities but that the cause differs from Mansfield’s conception.
Prior to the middle of the 20th century, the student bodies of American colleges and universities, especially the “elite” institutions, did not consist of America’s brightest young people. Many groups of potential students, such as women, racial and ethnic minorities, students of limited economic means and in-ternational students, were systematically ex-cluded from elite institutions and higher edu-cation as a whole through explicit rules, cul-
tural norms or economic constraints. Over the past decades, the country has seen many social movements and policy changes that attempted to transform America’s universi-ties from staid playgrounds for the elite’s chil-dren to meritocratic incubators of the next generation. While there remains much to be done to make university admission and edu-cation financing truly meritocratic, it is easi-er to claim the Brown student body in 2013 represents 6,000 of the nation’s and world’s brightest young people than it was to make the same claim 50, 30, or even 20 years ago.
Given that we’re no longer excluding thou-sands of great students based on arbitrary and irrelevant demographic factors, shouldn’t
we expect the average quality of student work to increase? If the average quality of student work increases, why shouldn’t grades corre-spondingly increase? Grade inflation is not an attempt to compensate for affirmative ac-tion. Rather, it is the natural result of success-ful attempts to make our universities fairer and more meritocratic, a success that should be praised instead of abhorred.
It is also plausible grade inflation has re-sulted from technological progress. The infor-mation technology revolution has drastically changed the process of producing graded academic work. Research no longer requires
painstaking hours digging through card catalogs and meticulously flipping through dusty back issues of journals on lonely library shelves. Instead, the entirety of the world’s academic corpus is now readily accessible at all hours of the day and night with a univer-sity login account. Technology has improved the writing process, too. Students no longer need to struggle with recalcitrant typewriters to draft a paper. Inexpensive computers and printers have made easier refining and per-fecting one’s writing.
The end result of technological changes is that an undergraduate can prepare writ-ten work that draws on a much larger body of research and is significantly more polished
than was written work prepared before the information technology revolution. When it becomes easier to prepare work traditionally understood to be A-level work, shouldn’t we see more A’s? This is, in fact, the pattern found in the data. The current grade inflation trend began during the mid-1980s, contemporane-ous with the arrival of personal computers such as the PC and Macintosh. As informa-tion became steadily more accessible, grades increased correspondingly.
That grades in the humanities and social sciences have increased more significantly in the past 25 years than grades in the physi-cal sciences is due to the differing nature of assignments given in these courses. Written work such as research papers greatly benefits from access to computers and the Internet, and those assignments are more common in humanities courses. Courses that rely on in-class assessment without the benefit of access to a computer, such as courses in the physi-cal sciences, will see a less significant increase, and any increase is presumably attributable to improved interactive study aids and the im-proved student population in those courses.
The observed increase in average GPA is the product of two trends worth celebrating — increasingly meritocratic selection of stu-dents and the arrival of new technologies that improve access to information and increase productivity. Grade inflation is not some-thing to fear. It is something we should praise.
ian eppler ’13 just wants an easy a. He may be contacted at
In defense of grade inflation
On January 7, Austin-based talk radio host Alex Jones excitedly claimed, “1776 will commence again if you try to take our fire-arms,” during his appearance on Piers Mor-gan Tonight.
While this comment was certainly en-tertaining — I highly recommend watch-ing the entire clip on youTube — what struck me the most about this segment was Jones’ complete lack of interest in engaging in real conversation about gun control. In-stead, Jones spoke over Morgan, who is a major proponent of gun control legislation, dodged Morgan’s questions and accused Morgan of asking him for “some little fac-toid” when Morgan inquired about how many gun murders there were in the Unit-ed Kingdom last year. Jones’ angry, unapol-ogetic tone and his emphatic body language also signaled that he was more concerned with advertising his point of view than tak-ing part in a productive conversation.
This segment of Piers Morgan Tonight is representative of the larger hostile debate on gun control that has been at the fore-front of domestic politics since the shoot-ings at the Century 16 movie theatre in Au-rora, Colorado and Sandy Hook Elemen-tary School. Without true communication, the gulf between the two major camps of the debate will continue to widen, political rhetoric will replace political action and the American people will be left feeling help-
less.For example, the National Rifle Associ-
ation has already geared up to fight Presi-dent Obama’s recommendations for new gun laws. After Obama laid out his plan this month to reduce gun violence in America, the NRA was quick to respond “with a fa-miliar gun lobby refrain: The nation doesn’t need any new gun laws, just better enforce-ment of laws that already exist,” wrote Dor-othy Samuels of the New york Times. De-spite compelling statistical evidence that lax enforcement is not the primary cause of gun violence — in 2010, for example, only
44 out of nearly 80,000 Americans failed background checks because they “lied or gave incorrect information were charged with a crime” — the NRA continues its ef-forts to reframe the debate in those terms to avoid other types of reforms.
The NRA has even taken part in anti-enforcement strategies, such as restrictions that make it challenging to “identify dealers who falsify sales records.” This utter hypoc-risy highlights how the NRA aims only to
appear responsive and decisive in the po-litical battle over gun control, especially in the wake of Sandy Hook.
What the NRA and all other parties in-volved in shaping gun laws must do is re-examine current laws as well as the under-lying forces that lead to gun violence in America, rather than spew empty rhetoric and staunchly defend their respective po-sitions. The gun control debate needs to involve a real conversation incorporating many different perspectives. It needs to face the sticky issue of which rights the Second Amendments conveys to gun owners and
determine the validity of those rights in the 21st century. It must address the role of pri-vate economic liberties and how to weigh these liberties against the security of our fellow citizens. Finally, it needs to examine a simple question: What kinds of laws will help save as many lives as possible?
I’m hopeful that these tasks are not mu-tually exclusive. The main obstacle facing a potential solution to the gun control de-bate is not that such a solution is elusive,
but rather it is the intense polarization that characterizes the nature of the debate.
The current political polarization will remain strong if the two camps do not ef-fectively communicate or accurately un-derstand each other’s perspectives. Harry Wilson, Roanoke College professor of po-litical science and author of “Guns, Gun Control, and Elections: The Politics and Policy of Firearms” has argued both sides hold misperceptions about the other. These misperceptions prevent real conversations from taking place. For example, Wilson has called gun control advocates to understand that “gun owners are not in favor of gun vi-olence. Gun owners are in many ways like them, and would genuinely like to see gun violence reduced.”
In the aftermath of Sandy Hook, some folks in Washington have signaled a will-ingness to question their assumptions and reconsider their previously held beliefs. For example, Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey has said he will support bans on military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines — both of which the Senate may soon con-sider — whereas in the past “he has explic-itly opposed any new gun control laws,” NPR recently reported.
This kind of reevaluation of one’s po-sition is necessary for a productive con-versation on gun control to commence in Congress, whether or not such a reevalua-tion leads one to change his or her original stance.
Jaclyn Katz ’14 would love to discuss gun legislation with you and can be reached
The need for real conversation on gun control
without true communication, the gulf between the two major camps of the debate will continue to widen,
political rhetoric will replace political action and the american people will be left feeling helpless.
There is reason to believe the trend is a byproduct of positive changes at america’s colleges and universities,
and it should be celebrated as evidence that these positive changes have been successful.
ian ePPleropinions Columnist
JaClyn KaTzopinions Columnist
