through the eyes of the editor: nursing research
TRANSCRIPT
Through the eyes of the editorNursing reseach
Roger Watson PhD FRCP Edin FAANEditor-in-Chief JAN
Editor Nursing Open
Professionalism in nursing andNursing management
2nd National NursingManagement Conference
Istanbul Turkey8-10 December 2016
Quality assurance in the publication processauthors editors reviewers publishers
Submission
Peer review
Editorial decision and input
Revision
Production
Publication
bull submission requirements based on international standards (eg ICMJE) re content ethics authorship etc
bull peer review (blind or open) bull reasons for rejection include
plagiarism redundancy sub-standard research faulty or incomplete analysis poor or incomplete reporting
bull revision (minor or major) aims to improve quality
bull further checks at production bull post-publication scrutiny (internal and
external)
Understand the publishing process
Write first for
bullEditors
bullReviewers
bullYour audience
The four rules of writing
Read the guidelines
Set realistic targets and count words
Seek criticism
Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Length
Layout
Organisation
Referencing system
Seeking criticism
Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Quality assurance in the publication processauthors editors reviewers publishers
Submission
Peer review
Editorial decision and input
Revision
Production
Publication
bull submission requirements based on international standards (eg ICMJE) re content ethics authorship etc
bull peer review (blind or open) bull reasons for rejection include
plagiarism redundancy sub-standard research faulty or incomplete analysis poor or incomplete reporting
bull revision (minor or major) aims to improve quality
bull further checks at production bull post-publication scrutiny (internal and
external)
Understand the publishing process
Write first for
bullEditors
bullReviewers
bullYour audience
The four rules of writing
Read the guidelines
Set realistic targets and count words
Seek criticism
Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Length
Layout
Organisation
Referencing system
Seeking criticism
Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Understand the publishing process
Write first for
bullEditors
bullReviewers
bullYour audience
The four rules of writing
Read the guidelines
Set realistic targets and count words
Seek criticism
Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Length
Layout
Organisation
Referencing system
Seeking criticism
Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
The four rules of writing
Read the guidelines
Set realistic targets and count words
Seek criticism
Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Length
Layout
Organisation
Referencing system
Seeking criticism
Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Journal guidelines
Length
Layout
Organisation
Referencing system
Seeking criticism
Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Journal guidelines
Length
Layout
Organisation
Referencing system
Seeking criticism
Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Seeking criticism
Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Seek criticism of your writing
NOT THIS
OR THIS
THIS
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg
PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Promoting integrity in research publication
COPE httppublicationethicsorg
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Authorship
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on
1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
International relevance
Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper
Abstract
bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic
bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken
bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Expect to have several revisions
hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters
James Mitchener
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Learn when to let go
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments
Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)
Rule 1 Answer completely
Rule 2 Answer politely
Rule 3 Answer with evidence
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Answer completely
Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it
Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Answer politely
Donrsquot start with
lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo
lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo
hellipetc
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Answer with evidence
If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Do you feel like this
I just donrsquot get Twitter
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
The power of
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact
Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be
highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity
Twitatio
ns
Twimpact
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
020523
Altmetrics
In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index
(Wikipedia)
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Beware of predatory journals
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson
An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling
the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms
of publications written by experts in the field
September 2012 288 pagesISBN
9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295
Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order
Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare
Getting It Right
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license
Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy
EditorRoger Watson University of Hull
wwwnursingopenjournalcom
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-
rwatsonhullacuk
0000-0001-8040-7625
rwatson1955
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Authorship
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Do you feel like this
- Slide 33
- The power of
- Slide 35
- Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
- Slide 37
- Altmetrics
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Beware of predatory journals
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
-