three-rock-solid-approaches-to-innovation
TRANSCRIPT
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Webinar Roadmap High Performance Teams
And the Performance Paradox
Job To Be Done
About Disruption
Are you Ready to Innovate
Define Innovation
Design Thinking
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Learning Objectives
• Define innovation
• Determine an organization’s readiness for innovation
• Identifying market opportunities using Clayton Christensen’s ‘Job to be Done’ analogy
• Describe the difference between Sustaining and Disruptive Innovation
• Describe IDEO’s Design Thinking methodology to explore innovation competencies
• Discuss principles of the high performance teams and the performance paradox
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Innovation Reasonably Defined
Innovation is the creation of better or more effective products, processes, services, technologies, or ideas that are accepted by markets, governments, and society.
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Our Definition of Innovation Is:
Innovation is something different
that has impact
The often unspoken goal of innovation is to
solve a problem
The process of translating an idea or invention into a good or service that creates
value or for which customers will pay
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
To what degree (1 barely – 5 absolutely) do… 1. We have a specific innovation strategy 2. Employees know what competencies are required to innovate
(CPM) 3. We have specific innovation goals 4. Employees find it easy to collaborate across functions and
departments 5. We share customer information broadly at all levels of the
organization 6. Our leaders encourage employees to take risks 7. Employees are evaluated specifically on their ability to innovate
as part of our performance management process
Innovation Readiness
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
To what degree (1 barely – 5 absolutely) do… 8. Employees solve problems using diverse teams (e.g., different
functions, levels) 9. We look for a candidate’s ability to be innovative as part of our
hiring process 10. It is easy to access key customer information 11. Employees are trained on how to innovate 12. Employees feel “safe” taking risks 13. We understand how our competitors use innovation to create
competitive advantage 14. We have a strategy to improve our overall innovation
capabilities
Innovation Readiness
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
To what degree (1 barely – 5 absolutely) do…
15. We know the areas where our customers are most dissatisfied
16. We have a separate budget for innovation in the organization
17. We treat our colleagues like customers
18. We have an effective change management process that builds commitment to a change
19. Our organization structure facilitates collaboration with our customers
Innovation Readiness
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
What was your average score?
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Disruptive Innovation Pe
rfor
man
ce
Time
Disruptive Innovations
Good strategies for established companies in established markets
Good strategies for firms seeking to create new growth businesses (or defend against attacks from below)
Most demanding customers
Least demanding customers
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Sustaining versus Disruptive Innovation
Sustaining Disruptive • Better performance along
traditional dimensions
• Targets the mainstream or most demanding customers in an established market
• Features a proven, winning business model
• Follows an approach that market leaders find attractive and easy to mimic
• “Good enough” along traditional dimensions, better along new dimensions
• Targets nonconsumers or overshot customers
• Features a low-cost, low-overhead business model
• Follows an approach that natural competitors would find unattractive or difficult to mimic
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
True or False
1. One company’s disruptive innovation is another company sustaining innovation
2. Disruption is only for technology
3. Companies can either pursue disruptive or sustaining innovations but not both
4. Disruptive innovations are harder to achieve than sustaining innovations
5. The customer is always right
Polling Question
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
World’s Top Ten Most Innovative Companies
The 2012 Global Innovation 1000 Key Findings, Booz & Company
Where did they disrupt?
How do they sustain?
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
2014’s Most Innovative Companies (Fast Company)
Who Why
1 Google 350 billion $ giant that reinvents itself and society with every mouse click
2 Bloomberg Philanthropies Data driven philanthropy
3 Xiaomi Low-cost feature rich mobile phones. Reengineering the smart phone business model
4 Dropbox For becoming the everything cloud
5 Netflix Creating great TV in a new context using an already proven model
6 AirBNB The new world’s largest hotel chain - almost
7 Nike For setting a sustainable example – database of materials
8 Zipdial Making missed calls an asset
9 Donors Choose .org Setting its sights on education reform. 225 millions from crowed sourcing
10 Yelp Bridging the online and off line world
http://www.fastcompany.com/section/most-innovative-companies-2014
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Jobs-To-Be-Done
What’s the job?
Who are the candidates? What are the hiring
criteria? HELP
WANTED
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Non-Consumers to Consumers: Focus on Constraints
What constrains
consumption?
Wealth
Access
Time
Skills
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
What’s Unique about Jobs-To-Be-Done?
• Puts the customer in the center of the innovation equation
• Determines how the customer views quality
• Incredibly actionable
• Identifies the real competition
Understanding jobs provides a blueprint for innovation
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Job, Criteria, or Candidate?
Job Criteria Candidate Small package
Aspirin
Feel healthy
Easy on the stomach
Feel less pain
Stretching exercises
Feel well-rested
Meditative breathing
Faster pain relief
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
The Goal of Design Thinking
The solution that emerges at the end of the DT innovation Process should be the overlap of these three qualities: • Desirability • Feasibility • Viability
Hit the sweet spot. They want it, you can deliver it , and it serves its purpose.
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Design Thinking Process
Authentic Non-obvious Reveling
Inspirational Connected Relevant
Low Risk Quick, easy Generative
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Innovation Framework
Ask:
• The right questions
• The right way
• Of the right people
• In the right way
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
A Simple Innovation Process — Defining Challenges
Phase 0 Prepare the
Organization
Phase 1 Define the Challenge
Phase 2 Generate Solutions
Phase 3 Plan and Execute
Phase 4 Engage
the Hearts and Minds
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
High-Performing Teams
Phase 0 Prepare the Organization
Phase 1 Define the Challenge
Phase 2 Generate Solutions
Phase 3 Plan and Execute
Phase 4 Engage the
Hearts & Minds
Personality Poker Suites Defined
♠ Represents the analytical, data-oriented people. They like facts and tend to be a bit more cerebral than the other styles.
♣ They are the people who “plan the work and work the plans.” Low clubs (5-9) are great planners while the high clubs (10-A) are more bottom-line focused.
♥ Are about the relationships and often make decisions based on how others will feel. Low hearts(5-9) are nurtuing and empathetic, while the high hearts (10-A) are outgoing and great networkers.
♦ Like new ideas and experiences. Low diamonds (5-9) are quite creative, while the high diamonds (10-A) value variety and flexibility.
©1998 and 2015, Linkage Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
The Performance Paradox
Tip 22
The Performance Paradox
Motivation
Perf
orm
ance