thomas reiprich danny hudson oxana nenestyan emmy noether research group institut für astrophysik

23
Weak Lensing and X-Ray Observations of a Complete X- Ray Flux-Limited Sample of Distant Galaxy Clusters Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik Universität Bonn http://www.dark-energy.net Thomas Erben Peter Schneider Alexey Vikhlinin Craig Sarazin

Upload: chibale

Post on 11-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Weak Lensing and X-Ray Observations of a Complete X-Ray Flux-Limited Sample of Distant Galaxy Clusters. Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik Universität Bonn http://www.dark-energy.net. Thomas Erben Peter Schneider - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Weak Lensing and X-Ray Observations of a Complete

X-Ray Flux-Limited Sample of Distant Galaxy Clusters

Thomas ReiprichDanny HudsonOxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research GroupInstitut für AstrophysikUniversität Bonnhttp://www.dark-energy.net

Thomas ErbenPeter SchneiderAlexey VikhlininCraig Sarazin

Page 2: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Primary Goal:Study Dark Energy

• Primary method: Evolution of cluster mass function.

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 3: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Evolution ofGalaxy Clusters

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Borgani & Guzzo (2001)

Page 4: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

z=0.05

z=0.61

Solid lines: w=-1,dashed lines: w=-0.5,dotted lines: w=-1.25.

Page 5: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Cluster Evolution

• Need distant AND local (complete) sample,

• need “good” selection,

• need “good” masses.

Page 6: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Reiprich & Böhringer (2002) HIFLUGCS, |z| = 0.05

Page 7: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Maughn et al. (2005) WARPS, 0.6 < z < 1.0

Page 8: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

X-ray emission “good” to select clusters!

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 9: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Local Sample: HIFLUGCS• ~60 X-ray brightest clusters in sky (Reiprich & Böhringer 2002),• ~completely covered with both Chandra (Hudson et al., in prep)

and XMM-Newton (Nenestyan et al., in prep.).

Page 10: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Distant Sample: 400d

• 400 Square Degree Survey (Vikhlinin, Burenin, Quintana, Hornstrup, Ebeling et al., in prep.), clusters serendipitously detected in “all” useful PSPC obs, volume > V(z<0.1), continuation of 160d (Vikhlinin et al., Mullis et al.);

• use complete subsample of ~40 X-ray luminous clusters with z > 0.35 (~20 with z > 0.5), completely covered with Chandra.

Page 11: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

“Good” local and distant cluster samples in place!

Page 12: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Distant Sample

• X-ray photon statistics poorer,

• merger fraction higher (hydrostatic/virial equilibrium?)?

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

M. Markevitch

Page 13: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

From S. Randall. EPS, LCDM. M=5x1014 Msun. Mergers > 1/3 mass ratio. Absolute scale arbitrary.

Page 14: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Megacam @ MMT 6.5m

Collab with UVa and CfA.

Page 15: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

36 (2kx4k) CCDs, 2 readouts/CCD, 2x2 binning, unbinned (0.08”/pixel) ~800MB.

Page 16: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

PSF study:

No obvious jumpsof stellar ellipticityacross chipboundaries of36 CCDs.

By T. Erben.

Page 17: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Mosaic of 25 dithered obs. (1800 fits image extensions).Box ~30’, 11k.GaBoDS pipeline (Erben et al., AN, 326, 432) on 38-CPU.

Page 18: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

ROSAT PSPC contours from a z=0.5 cluster.

Page 19: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik
Page 20: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik
Page 21: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Chandra data from A. Vikhlinin.

Page 22: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

S/N = 1.0, 1.5, …, 3.5. By T. Erben.

Page 23: Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Emmy Noether Research Group Institut für Astrophysik

Summary

• Good samples, selection, masses,

• will get useful constraints on (constant) DE equation of state, w, from clusters alone (<30%) - soon,

• ground work for future large surveys (check self-cal, e.g., z-dependent scatter in L-M).