thlist of presentations held on 27 may 2014 - · pdf filethlist of presentations held on 27...
TRANSCRIPT
List of Presentations held on 27th May 2014
1. Centre for Assessment Evaluation and Research................................................... 1
2. COMMTEL - META PROJECT……………………………………………….................................. 21
3. Proposal for Project e-Exam under NMEICT........................................................... 49
4.Institutional Network and Virtual Knowledge Repository for Arts And Humanities Education In India...................................................................................
66
5. TARKSHYA Main Project…………………………………………………………………………………….. 87
STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING NMEICT28/05/2014
1
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Shri Vineet Joshi – Chairman CBSE and Executive Council CAER
Mrs. Sarita Manuja - Director CAER
2
• Shri Vineet Joshi, IAS (Chairman, CBSE & Chairman CAER – Executive Council)
• Ms. Sarita Manuja (Director, Centre for Assessment, Evaluation & Research)
• Prof. James Stephen Tognolini (Senior Vice President, Research and Assessment
Pearson and Visiting Professor, University of Oxford)
• Dr. Sadhana Parashar (Professor and Director - Training and Academics, CBSE)
• Mr. Arjun Bahadur (Deputy Director, Centre for Assessment, Evaluation & Research)
• Dr. Priyanka (Research Officer, Centre for Assessment, Evaluation & Research)
• Dr. Akanksha Bapna (CEO, Evaldesign)
CBSE – CAER CORE PROJECT TEAM
3
Background• JEE (Main)
High-stakes examination for which students from across the country spend
significant amounts of time practising to maximise their score
While preparation for examinations is a very useful learning tool, it starts to have a
negative impact on broader learning when the focus is purely on “practising for the
test”
The fact that students are paying significant amounts of money to have this tuition is
also impacting on the “social fabric” of society
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
4
Scope and Coverage of Solution• The CBSE - CAER is proposing to develop an item bank of JEE (Main) items which
students preparing for the JEE can access online. These items will be linked to
learning materials which are designed to help students improve their learning
• All candidates (nationally and internationally) would have access to this powerful
“learning” tool which will addresses some of the concerns outlined in the previous
slide in that the focus is on learning
• It is designed to identify areas of potential weakness; promulgate corrective
strategies that have been identified through an analysis of the assessment items;
and, give further practice examples from similar JEE items which assess the same
skill to make sure that the student has understood the concept
• The intention is to utilise ICT tools to make the learning more interactive
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
5
Steps Involved
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Develop Table of Specifications covering the
construct of JEE
Identifying and Tagging a pool of
501 Items by Subject Experts and Test
Developers of JEE.
Identifying , describing and
storing the rationales behind the distracters
Incorporating corrective learning strategies for each
incorrect option chosen
Build additional items for practice for each incorrect action to improve learning
Develop an online system for item bank including feedback
and learning components
(with technology partner)
Locate the item bank system on a website to make it accessible
world wide 24/7.
Conduct Load trials and carry out pilot
study
6
Process Flow
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
7
Features of Platform
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
8
Features of Platform (Contd)
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
9
Technology Used and Hosting Architecture
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Programming language - Ruby v2.1.0.
Web Framework - Ruby on Rails v4.1.0
ORM - Active Record
Database - MySQL
Front end - ERB templates, jQuery, SCSS,
Bootstrap
Caching - Redis
Web Server - Nginx
Application Server - Unicorn
Server Operating System - Ubuntu 13.10
Hosting Architecture - Amazon Web Service stack
10
Deliverables and Timelines
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Key deliverables Expected time of delivery
Inception of the Project 1 July 2014
Development of item bank with 501 items 31 Oct 2014
Completion of technology Platform along with Hosting 31 Dec 2014
Pilot run of the Platform 1 Jan 2015
Submission of report of Pilot 30 June 2015
Update of Platform basis Pilot 1 Aug 2015
11
Cost of the Project
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Recurring Heads Annual Cost (INR)
Hosting Cost 3,00,000
Human Resource
Project Manager 12,00,000
Data Analyst 6,00,000
System Administration Cost 12,00,000
Academic Advisors 5,00,000
Total 38,00,000
12
Cost of the Project
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Development Heads Cost (INR)
•Development of Table of Specifications (TOS)•Selection of 501 items coded with metadata described within TOS•Identify 10 items with characteristics similar to the 501 items and tagged as per TOS
14,00,000
Review and Quality Assurance 6,00,000
Building of rationales behind each incorrect option for all 501 itemsTo explain and build Corrective learning strategies for each
24,00,000
Review and Quality Assurance 6,00,000
CBSE CAER Cost of Managing the Development 24,00,000
Total 74,00,000
13
Cost of the Project (Contd)
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Development Heads Cost (INR)
Platform Development
Inception Stage (Requirements ; Analysis ; Documentation) 2,80,000
U I Design 2,00,000
Coding and Development 23,00,000
Testing and Integration 11,50,000
Infrastructure and Release 2,50,000
Total (including mandatory costs) 47,00,000
14
Cost of the Project (Summary)
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
Development Heads Cost (INR)
Recurring Cost (Annual) 38,00,000
Development Cost (Content) 74,00,000
Development Cost (Platform) 47,00,000
Total 1,59,00,000
15
Unique Features of Solution
• Self learning model which allows learning at own pace and remediation through
pedagogic interventions
• Leveraging ICT to maximize reach and effectiveness of learning
•24/7 access by students world wide
• Can be used for student and teacher development
• Model is based on Social Equity, Access to everyone and improved Quality of
learning
• Large pool of CBSE – CAER domain experts and assessment experts
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
16
Realize Objectives of MissionNMEICT Mission –
A proper balance between content generation, research in critical areas relating to imparting of
education and connectivity for integrating our knowledge with the advancements in other
countries is to be attempted. No Talent of the country should be allowed to go waste
Knowledge modules based on the personalized needs of the learner would need to be delivered
to him /her at the right time with the right content interactively to take care of his/her aspirations
Project Goals and Intention
This project generates content through expert intervention, ensures that all students across the
country have access to high-quality content through this online platform at minimal cost and
increases accessibility of the learning material
It allows for self-paced learning by enabling students to access the question bank and concept
details on their own time, making it highly personalized
DEVELOPING A JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION (Main) (JEE) ONLINE ITEM BANK FOR REMEDIAL TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF CANDIDATES
17
CAER – RESEARCH PROJECTS COMPLETED WITH CBSE
• Some Possible Options for Aggregating Subject Examinations at the
Level of Scores for Entry into Indian Tertiary Institutions – JEE
Normalisation Model
• Evaluation of the Validity and Functioning of the Test (The Central
Teacher Eligibility Test, November 2012) - CTET Project
• Study of the Structure of Grade XII Question Papers for Different
School Examination Boards – 21 State Boards
• Evaluation of the Item Functioning of the Test (JEE Main- 2013) – Item
Analysis
18
CAER – RESEARCH PROJECTS ONGOING WITH CBSE
• Developing On-Line Problem Solving Assessment System for the
students of Grade IX and XI targeting to nurture and assess cross
curricular skills
• Evaluation of the Item Functioning of the Test (JEE Advanced – 2013)
• Examining Grade XII Examination Practices of CBSE and making
recommendations for Improvement
• Comparative Analysis of Difficulty Level of Grade X question
papers of Board based and School Based Summative Assessment (II)
• Evaluation of the Item Functioning of the Test (CTET, 2014)
19
Thank You!
Centre for Assessment, Evaluation and Research (CAER)4th Floor, 17 Rouse Avenue, New Delhi 110 002
Email: [email protected]: www.indiacaer.org
20
“COMMTEL - META PROJECT”(Commerce Enhanced Education through
Technology Enabled Learning)
under NMEICT, MHRD, Govt of India
Prof K V Bhanu MurthyDr Jaswinder Singh
Dr Vimal Rarh
Seamless Integrated e-Learning Knowledge Management System
21
A seamless system of pedagogy in Commerce
through pervasive computing
by creating and broadcasting video enriched lectures (Live Plus)
an Integrated Knowledge Management System (IKMS)
22
Creation of Live Plus Lectures
Live discussions –online
Blended learning pedagogy
Empowering / training Teachers
Optimum utilization of high quality teaching resources
Integration of pedagogy with multimedia and ICT tools
Multi-lingual adaptability of Live Plus Lectures
Create a Searchable Database of Lectures and Quizzes
General Objectives
23
development and integration of educational technologies
through a well structured learning
sequence
that blends with the present
class-room teaching
by empowering teachers
without replacing them
24
National Centre
Regional Centre
Regional Centre
Zonal centre
Zonal centre
Zonal centre
Local unit Local Unit Local Unit
Regional Centre
Regional Centre
Implementation Structure
25
For the Pilot Project
One Partner University having 40-50 colleges•Zonal (Part)•Local units (colleges)
Centre for e-Learning, SGTB KhalsaCollege shall act as a unified facility•The Nodal Centre (NC) , Regional Centre
(RC) and as Zonal Centre (ZC)
26
Optimum use of existing
NMEICT and other open
source resources
AakashTablet
A-VIEW-video
conferencing tool
DTH studioLMS-
Brahaspati, MOODLE
E-Content
Android based
Mobile apps
27
•Development of Live-Plus Video lectures
•Transmission/ Broadcasting of Live Plus Video Lectures
•Development of e-Learning Object Repository (e-LOR)
•Development of Transcript of Live Plus Lectures as meta data and searchable tags
•Development of Question bank
•Workshops and Training
•Development of e-Learning Environment
•Research on systems, e-learning, pedagogy, feedback, quizzes, etc.
Verticals / Deliverables in COMM-TEL
28
I - Development of Live-Plus Video lectures
B.Com Courses
12 Courses•6 courses in English
medium•6 courses in Hindi
medium• -52 lectures each
- to cover syllabi of 60 hour duration in conventional mode of teaching-learning
Add-On Courses6 Courses•Computer Fundamentals
and Word Processing.•Spreadsheet applications
in business.•Computerized accounting
software.•Database applications in
business.•Communication and
presentation skills.•Group discussion,
interview and C.V. creation.
29
I - Development of Live-Plus Video lectures
ODD SEMESTER EVEN SEMESTER
Course Title
No of Courses
No of Lectures (English Medium)
No of Lectures (Hindi Medium)
Course Title
No of Courses
No of Lectures (English Medium)
No of Lectures (Hindi Medium)
B.Com - 1 yr
2 13 x 4 = 52 13 x 4 = 52
B.Com - 1 yr
2 13 x 4 = 52
13 x 4 = 52
B.Com - 2 yr
2 13 x 4 = 52 13 x 4 = 52
B.Com - 2 yr
2 13 x 4 = 52
13 x 4 = 52
B.Com - 3 yr
2 13 x 4 = 52 13 x 4 = 52
B.Com - 3 yr
2 13 x 4 = 52
13 x 4 = 52
Add-on-1,2,3
3 (13 x 1) x 3= 39
- Add-on-4,5,6
3 (13 x 1) x 3= 39
-
Total: 702 Lectures
195 156 195 156
30
II. TRANSMISSION AND BROADCASTING OF LIVE PLUS VIDEO LECTURES
Zonal Educator present at the
Transmitting end
Facilitator at the Receiving end (at the Local units,
around 50 colleges, in the pilot projects)
31
Zonal, Discussion andQ-A
Local Unit
National (English language)Regional (Regional language)
30 min lecture
15 min doubt session
15 min Setting up +15 min Feedback
75 minLecture
II. TRANSMISSION AND BROADCASTING OF LIVE PLUS VIDEO LECTURES
32
DEVELOPMENT OF e-LEARNING OBJECT REPOSITORY (e-LOR)
•teachers : in their conventional class-room teaching
•Students: to understand the small concept with the help of animations, audio, video, simulation, interactive content etc.
•as objects to be embedded while developing LivePlusLectures
804 e-LOs to be developedUSES
e-LOs arestandalone multimedia objects
33
Continuous evaluation, quality assessment and feedback system for enhancing the e-LOs
Uploading of e-LOs to form e-LOR having associated key-words as meta data.
Development of website with searchable database.
Tagging of each e-LO with key words
Conversion of story board into multimedia enriched e-Learning Object.
Review of Story –boards for e-LOs
Story –board development for e-LOs
Identification of individual concepts to be developed as e-LOs
Development of Templates and Prototypes
34
IV. DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSCRIPT OF LIVE PLUS LECTURES AS META DATA AND
SEARCHABLE TAGS
Transcript of Live Plus lectures
made available for online access
The text files will be certified by the faculty who developed the video courses.
powerful search engines
Metadata Tagging
35
V. DEVELOPMENT OF QUESTION BANK FOR RANDOM QUIZ AND OFFLINE ASSESSMENT CREATION
Objective and subjective Questions
with appropriate tagging
Online Quizzes with grading and feedback
Generation of offline assignment
Around 10,000-12,000 questionsin all for18 courses.
36
VI. WORKSHOPS AND TRAINING
• Workshops for Course Coordinators and Educators (National, Regional and Zonal
• Training for Facilitators
•Workshops for development of e-LOs: Faculty, SMEs and Internal Team
37
VII. DEVELOPMENT OF e-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR COMM-TEL
Inte
grat
ed P
orta
l with
fu
nctio
nsSearchable Data Base for Live Plus Lectures
Searchable Data Base for transcript of Live Plus Lectures
E-Learning Object Repository (e-LOR)
Database of question bank
Online Quizzes.
Online and Offline assignment generation
Feedback and discussion forums
38
VIII. RESEARCH
Opinion polls, feedback analysis
Data collection and analysis.
Development of student and
teacher friendly mobile apps
Analysis of Live Plus lectures
development and delivery processes.
Quality evaluation techniques for e-
LOs
Scalability to other courses and other
subjects.
39
Year 1( in Rs Lacs)
Year 2( in Rs Lacs)
Year 3( in Rs Lacs)
Total ( in Rs Lacs)
Recurring
Development of LivePlus Lectures@Rs 7 Lakhs for 18 courses
126 0 0 126
Manpower 2 2 2 6
Coordinator Honararia @ 7.5% of total courseware production cost
9.45 0 0 9.45
Travel 3 0.5 0.5 4
Contingency 2 2 2 6
Non-Recurring
a. Infrastructure – Recording and editing Studio.
0 0 0 From the DTH Project
b. Additional Infrastructure upgradation for staff, office, hardware, software, establishment, etc.
40 10 0 50
c. Servers for storage of raw video files , Power, UPS & AC.
50 20 70
Total Rs 271.45 Lacs
BUDGET –I : Development of Live-Plus Video lectures
40
BUDGET –II : Budget II (Transmission and Broadcasting of Live Plus Video Lectures) at Nodal Centre (CFEL)
Year 1(in Rs Lacs)
Year 2(in Rs Lacs)
Year 3(in Rs Lacs)
Total(in Rs Lacs)
Recurring
a. Honorarium* 28.08 28.08
b. Travel, Office Expense, Contingencies, Establishment and miscellaneous
1 2 1 4
c. Maintenance, technical staff, power back-up, etc.
1 4 1 6
Non-Recurring
a. Transmission and broadcasting studio for Two way interactivity, software, connectivity (dedicated 1 GBPS ), etc.
DTH and A-View Platform
Total Rs 38.08 Lacs
41
Budget III (Development of e-Learning Object Repository (e-LOR))
Year 1 ( In Rs Lacs)
Year 2 ( In Rs Lacs)
Year 3 ( In Rs Lacs)
Total ( In Rs Lacs)
Recurring
Development cost of e-LOs* 203.4 203.4
Manpower 100 42 42 184
Travel 10 10 10 30
Contingency 10 10 10 30
Non-Recurring
Infrastructure 0 0 0 Shared from other components
42
Budget IV (Development of Transcript)First Year(in Rs Lacs)
Second Year(in Rs Lacs)
Third Year(in Rs Lacs)
Total(in Rs Lacs)
Recurring
a. Honorarium* 12 7.85 0 19.85
b. Manpower 5 4.6 0 9.6
c. Consumables 0 0 0 To be shared from other components
d. Travel 1 1 0 2
Non-recurring
Infrastructure - High power Storage servers, hardware, software, high speed scanner, etc.
80 80Total Rs 111.45 Lacs
43
Budget V (Development of Question bank)
Not Budgeted: Budget to be adjusted from the Transcript and
LivePlus Lecture development.
44
Budget VII (Development of e-Learning Environment)First Year(in Rs Lacs)
Second Year(in Rs Lacs)
Third Year(in Rs Lacs)
Total(in Rs Lacs)
Recurring
Manpower and outsourcing cost for development , metadata creation, deployment and maintenance of softwares/websites and uploading of data/content for the different following functionalities in an integrated manner
20 20 17 57
Travel 2 2 2 6
Consumables 2 2 2 6
Non-recurring
Production Server and mirroring server 0 0 0 Centralised NMEICT server
Other Hardware for technical staff and office furniture
30 10 10 50
Total Rs 119 Lacs
45
Budget VI (Workshops and Training)First Year(in Rs Lacs)
Second Year(in Rs Lacs)
Third Year(in Rs Lacs)
Total(in Rs Lacs)
Recurring
a. Workshop/Training cost* 66 13.2 0 79.2
b. Manpower 2 2 2 6
c. Travel 0 0 0 Already a part of training cost
Non-recurring
a. Receiving end set-up for testing, monitoring and training
5 5
b. Additional Infrastructure – Aakash tablets, laptops, etc. for training
5 5
Total Rs 95.2 Lacs
46
Budget VIII (Research)
Item Estimated Amount – First year(in Rs Lacs)
Estimated Amount – 2nd
Year(in Rs Lacs)
Estimated Amount- 3rd
Year(in Rs Lacs)
Total (in Rs Lacs)
Recurring
Man Power 10 10 15 35
Non-Recurring
Contingencies 2 1 1 4
Travel 3 2 2 7
Total Rs 46 Lacs
47
Overall BudgetDELIVERABLES Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
( in Rs Lacs) ( in Rs Lacs) ( in Rs Lacs) ( in Rs Lacs)
1 Video Plus Lectures –Development Cost 232.5 34.5 4.5 271.5
2 Live Transmission/ Broadcasting cost at Nodal Centre (CFEL) 2 34.08 2 38.08
3 Development of e-Learning Object Repository (e-LOR)) 323.4 62 62 447.4
4 Development of Transcript of LivePlus Lectures 98 13.45 0 111.45
5 (Development of Question bank) 0 0 0 0
6 Workshops and Training 78 15.2 2 95.2
7 Development of e-Learning Environment 54 34 31 119
8 Research 15 13 18 46
GRAND TOTAL (Rs. Lakhs) 802.85 206.23 119.5 1128.58
48
Zurück zur ersten Seite
R.K. ShevgaonkarDirector, IIT Delhi and
Professor of Electrical Engineering, IIT Bombay
Proposal for Project e-Exam under NMEICT
49
Motivation
On the initiative of MHRD a large number of e-learning projects have been initiated under thehead NMEICT in last one decade
Most of the project however either focused oncontent creation or content dissemination.
Question: How the e-content has helped in raisingthe standard of engineering education in thecountry?
While the NPTEL courses put thrust onfundamentals and logical development of thesubject, the examinations in most of theuniversities test how well the subject content ismemorized.
50
How to make the e-content more usable
To make the e-content more usable, two things areimperative: Integration of the e-content developed under
NMEICT in the university curriculum Designing the question paper that is
commensurate with the content.
51
Present Examination System (1/2)
Most of the technical colleges in India are affiliatedto a parent university
The affiliating university forms the syllabi for thesubjects and conducts examination for all subjectsin all semesters
The central control of the examination makes theexamination vulnerable to many factors likeavailability of qualified paper setters, distributionof the exam material etc.
Many times it becomes difficult to find a goodpaper setter.
Also there is always a fear of leakage of thequestion paper in a large university system
52
Present Examination System (2/2)
The question papers invariably test onlymemorizing capability of the students instead oftesting the in-depth understanding of the subject,logical reasoning and analytical capability.
The questions are typically descriptive type. Even if there are analytical questions, the same
questions repeat and students memorize even theanalytical problems.
53
The way forward …
It is therefore apparent that there is a need todevelop high quality examination system which isaligned with the quality e-content created under theNMEICT project.
Through this platform all universities can setquestion papers of same high standard.
Also it will take away all the problem associatedwith the paper distribution logistics.
The question papers can be set and (re-set if needarises) by the stroke of a key and can bedistributed instantly.
54
Anatomy of an Exam In technical subjects, the exam should test:
Knowledge of basic principles . Application of the basic principles to define an
engineering problem . Solving the problem following systematic steps using
analytical tools .
55
Basic Philosophy of the Project If a large number of problems are created to meet
these objectives, a quality examination can beconducted by any university even if there is shortageof highly qualified paper setters and limited logistic.
One may wonder that by creating a question bank, willthe exam become known!
Indeed the questions will be known to all the studentsbut if the number of questions is large (few hundred tothousand per subject) knowledge of thousandquestions is as good as knowing the full subject.
Further, from a given numerical problem infinitenumber of problems can be generated by changingjust the numerical values.
56
Methodology The e-Exam needs development at two levels.
Creation of question bank and its dynamic solutionmanual.
Development of a system which can assemblequestions to create a question paper of desiredcomposition.
While the first component requires subject experts andtechnical manpower, the later needs general softwaredevelopers.
Thus we will have:Question Paper Composing PlatformDynamic Problem Solution Platform
57
Creation of Question Bank and the Solution Manual (1/2)
First the subjects that are needed by large number ofcolleges at the UG level and which are not descriptivetype will be identified.
This will be followed by identifying SMEs who candevelop the desired e-question bank.
The SMEs will be encouraged to compile all possiblequestions from past university exams and othercompetitive exams.
The SME will then study the commonality of thequestions and will create questions which meets thepedagogy criteria defined above.
The SME will create questions which will test allpossible ways through which the knowledge can betested. 58
Creation of Question Bank and the Solution Manual (2/2)
For a typical course, it is expected to develop a fewhundred questions which will cover all aspects of thecourse.
The questions will be of different complexity levelwhich will be indicated by the marks attached to aquestion or by typical time needed to solve thequestion.
Once the basic question banks are created, a dynamicsolution manual will be created.
The dynamic solution is a dedicated program for eachquestion, which can be run for different numericalvalues for the input data.
The SMEs would end up creating a lot of IP !59
For example …
Type of questions: one mark question could be just memory type, two marks question could be of direct application
of a formula type with small calculation, three, four, five mark questions could be of
multiple calculation nature. To provide flexibility to the paper setter, the subject
will be divided in large number of modules andquestions for different marks will be created for eachmodule.
There will also be complex questions which will runacross the multiple modules.
60
Creation of a Question Paper The paper composition strategy is defined by the paper
setter and therefore a platform needs to be createdwhich can use paper setter defined parameters tocompose a question paper.
A course is divided into small modules and each modulewill have a question bank of different complexity levelsand different marks.
A university first will define the syllabus by choosing aset of modules from the modules of the e-contentdeveloped under the content development project.
The syllabus is made available to the paper setter. The paper setter will define the format of the paper i.e.,
what is the weightage given to different modules andnumber of questions in different complexity groups.
61
Finally… The program then will assemble questions to create a
question paper. The paper setter will be given flexibility to look at the
individual questions and ask for an alternativequestion if needed.
The alternative question will be randomly picked upfrom the question bank.
The paper setting program can use information of theprevious years' question papers to avoid repetition.The paper setter can iterate till s/he gets a satisfactoryquestion paper.
At this stage the paper setter can freeze the questionpaper and can ask for a solution which can be keptconfidential with the controlling authority.
62
Funding RequirementFunding for Paper setting Platform
1. Manpower (2) 10.00 Lac2. Software 2.00 Lac3. Coordinator Honorarium 3.00 LacTotal 15.00 Lac
Funding needed per course1. Manpower (2-3) 10.00 Lac2. SME Honorarium 10.00 Lac3. Other expenses 3.00 LacTotal 23.00 Lac per courseIn the pilot phase, e-Exam will be created for 10fundamental courses in few branches of engineering.Total Funding over 2 years 245.00 Lac63
Achievements of the Projects1. The project will enhance the standard of examination in
more than 5000 engineering institutions in the country.2. The expenses for conducting university examination will be
reduced substantially.3. There will be no need to set multiple question papers for the
security reason.4. It will make the question papers error-free and therefore will
avoid disputes.5. It will make the examinations leak proof.6. It will save time for the paper setter as the paper can be
composed quickly and the solutions can be generatedautomatically.
7. Evaluation may be computerized and can be made faster anderror-free.
64
Thank you for your attention ….… Questions ?
65
CONCEPT PRESENTATION
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, HYDERABAD&
SAHAPEDIA: AN ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIA ON INDIAN CULTURE AND HERITAGE
INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK AND
VIRTUAL KNOWLEDGE REPOSITORY FOR ARTS AND HUMANITIES EDUCATION IN INDIA
66
Outline of Project: Institutional Network &
Virtual Knowledge Repository forArts And Humanities Education In India
• Creating systems for resource sharing & collaborative research in humanistic and heritage studies via a network of universities and cultural centres
• Pilot Phase: 18 months
• Principal Investigator: Prof Navjyoti Singh
• Co-Investigator: Dr. Sudha Gopalakrishnan
• Anchor Institutions: IIIT-Hyderabad and Sahapedia
• Partner Institutions: 30 institutions across India
67
Background
• Need to take a fresh look at higher education in India in the light of the relatively less emphasis on humanities programmes throughout the country.
• Change the general perception that it has only an intrinsic value and no instrumental value.
• Education with stress on humanities and the arts would help students cope with new challenges in the twenty-first century.
68
Relevance of Project• No structured networks linking Indian academic & cultural
bodies involved in the arts and humanities
• ICT transforms the scope of education:
• Extending access without compromising on quality• Making the exchange of knowledge a participatory
process
• Introducing into the education paradigm such knowledge as is transmitted orally
69
Relevance of Project (…contd.)
• ICT transforms the scope of research and training:
• Recovering the interdisciplinary perspective of Indian knowledge traditions, as also their interactive mode of enquiry
• Aggregating knowledge resources dispersed across language and discipline, and developing new digital tools for their interpretation
• Training a new cadre of heritage interpreters in an increasingly interconnected world
70
Objectives
• Integrating knowledge on India’s scripted, artistic and oral heritage in the curriculum
• Building networks of universities and systems for sharing academic resources
• Encouraging interdisciplinary conversations, promoting collaborative research, and creating synergies between humanistic education, and documentation, conservation and heritage management
• Institutionalizing local-level participation and contribution
71
Objectives (….contd.)
• Establishing standards and guidelines for the development and access to quality content
• Collating and curating existing documents
• Systematizing multi-lingual content generation
• Training a cadre of heritage interpreters
• Developing an e-Humanities hub through virtual collaboratories for use in learning/teaching
• Developing a high connectivity ‘distant humanities studio’ and ‘distant class room’
72
Scope of Pilot Phase
• Involve 900 participants across India
• Create 200 content modules
• Build e-humanities hub with
five virtual collaboratories
73
OutcomesITEM QUANTITY
Online platform for sharing, co-creation & exchange
Multi-media academic resources (texts and AV material) 200
Quality introductions to interpreting tangible & intangible heritage90
Online teaching (video lectures, tutorials) 120
Study resources (guidance on reading primary & secondary texts, annotated bibliographies) 90
Models for projects of self-directed exploration (local history, oral histories) 12
Indexes to literature in subjects across disciplines 20
Virtual Collaboratory Research and Learning 5
Assets (distant studio and classroom, research lab) 2
Standards and guidelines for content creation and processing --
Intellectual Property (technical assets for open and non-commercial use) --
74
Coordination of Activities
Steering Committee(representatives of NMEICT, higher education &
domain experts) Defining vision and scope
Research TeamDirection setting
Peer review
Technical Team e-Humanities Hub
Distant Humanities Studio + Class Room Virtual Collaboratories
Universities and Cultural CentresTwo point-people for each institution to oversee projects carried out by faculty and students
& to coordinate collaborations across departments and/or institutions
75
Project Cell Composition
Within the institution/university, projects would be carried out through consultation between:• The Research Team• Coordinator from the institution• Faculty and students (A team of 8 students + 2
faculty per department and 3 departments on an average)
76
Milestones
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Set up
Conceptualization
Design
Detailed planning
Project execution
Mid-term review
Project execution 2
Website development
Closure
77
Costs
Budget Heads Cost in INR
Project Team/Office 16,60,000
Research Team 78,10,000
National workshop x 2 21,00,000
Regional workshops x 4 24,00,000
Hackathons x 2 6,00,000
Travel 11,70,000
Honoraria (6 lakhs x 12
months)
1,80,00,000
Documentation 1,00,00,000
Budget Heads Cost in INR
Programming 1,00,00,000
Software 20,00,000
Technical Team 67,60,000
Web hosting 15,00,000
Web maintenance for 1.5 yrs 15,00,000
E-Humanities hub 75,00,000
Contingency 5,00,000
Overheads (20% of total) 1,47,00,000
TOTAL INR 8,82,00,000
78
Multimedia Modules
79
Partner Institutions (projected)1.Allahabad University2.Bhasha Institute, Ahmedabad3.C-DAC, Pune4.CIEFL, Hyderabad5.Central Institute of Indian
Languages, Mysore6.CEPT, Ahmedabad7.FRLHT University, Hyderabad8.FTII, Pune9.Goa University 10.IGNCA11.IIT (BHU), Varanasi
(Humanities)12.IIT Guwahati13.IIT-Delhi (Department of
Humanities)14.Indira Gandhi National Open
University15.Jadavpur University 16.JNU
17.Kalakshetra, Chennai18.Kerala University, Social
Science Department19.Madras University20.Malayalam University21.Manipal Centre for Philosophy
and Humanities22.MS University, Baroda23.NIAS, Bengaluru24.NID, Ahmedabad25.Panjab University, Chandigarh26.School of Humanities and Social
Sciences, SASTRA University27.SPIC-MACAY (have expressed
interest in principle)28.Srishti School of Art, Design and
Technology, Bangalore29.Tirupati University30.Utkal University31.Visvabharati University
80
Inter-Disciplinary Approach
81
Activity PlanACTIVITIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Set up teamsAppoint Steering Committee, Office Team, Technical Team and Research TeamSend invitation letters to partner institutionsConceptualizationConvene consultation with all partner institutions Partner institutions prepare proposals Sign MoUsAcquire equipmentDesignPartner institutions decide treatment of each projectResearch team defines standards and guidelines for content submissionDesign Distant Studio and Class RoomDetailed planningDiscuss financial and technical resources needed for each projectIntegrate individual proposals within overall framework5 colab teams in placeAuthoringwrite 1st draft1st draft reviewed by Research Team Mid-term reviewReview and revise standards and guidelinesReview and revise project plansReview Colabs and functioning of e-Humanities hubAuthoring (contd.)Write 2nd draftsCopy-editing of 2nd draftRevise 2nd draft Review by Steering CommitteeRevise 3rd draft of chaptersFinal approval by Steering CommitteeBeta version of colabs releasedWebsite developmentDesign and development of websiteUpload materialTesting and troubleshootingTesting of colabs and impact studyProject closureSubmit accountsDisband teamLessons learnedCollection of best practicesArchiving of contentApplication of systems for easy retrieval and access
82
Cost of Project Team
Project Coordinator 1 x 6,00,000 6,00,000Office staff 2 x 3,00,000 6,00,000Computers: 5 x 40,000 2,00,000Laptop 2 x 60,000 1,20,000Printer (all in one) 1 x 20,000 20,000DSLR cameras 2 x 60,000 1,20,000Video Camera 1 x 75,000 75,000
83
Cost of Research Team
Project Research Officer 1 x 10,0,000 10,60,000PhD Researchers 5 x 6,00,000 30,00,000MS Researchers 10 x 3,00,000 30,00,000Interns 15 x 50,000 7,50,000
84
Cost of Travel
Principal Investigator 6 x 35,000 2,10,000Research team 6 x 35,000 2,10,000Institutional teams (regional) 30 x 25,000 7,50,000
85
Cost of Technical Team
Sr. Project Engineer 1 x 10,60,000 10,60,000Project Engineers 2 x 6,00,000 12,00,000Research Associates 10 x 3,00,000 30,00,000Research Assistants 15 x 1,00,000 15,00,000
86
TARKSHYA Main project
Proposal Submitted to NMEICT,DHE, MHRD, GoI
By
Dr. P. RamanujanPrincipal Investigator,
Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan23.5.2014
87
MOTIVATION/JUSTIFICATION•India`s most priceless possession is Heritage and it is her gift to mankind, pursuing any of the four Purushartha (objects of desire), i.e., Dharma (Ethics/Morals), Artha (prosperity), Kama (worldly desires), or Moksha (liberation)•In the present day world, pursuit of material objectives demands so much of energy and time that no time can be spared for finer aspects of life•Many Indians in the current and younger generations have no clear-cut idea or ideals in life which is indigenous and inherited from times immemorial•A strong appeal with sound logical foundation and great significance about our cultural heritage is needed
88
MOTIVATION/JUSTIFICATION•Into 21st century, to achieve national integration, guide humanity, remove shortcomings of current trends, the deviations like intolerance, violence etc.,•Many eminent/wise men believe that the situation is alarming; to restore value system, the Indian heritage is vital, in general•Historic, priceless, original manuscripts are only available at Leningrad, Berlin, London etc.•It may not be possible at all to reclaim some of them;•Those available are badly maintained, in dilapidated libraries;•Preservation in digital form is vital (as against analog form)
89
MOTIVATION/JUSTIFICATION•Goal of IT/computing/AI is tending towards understanding human 'intelligence', mind and consciousness•WTO, IPR and Copyright Issues pose most serious threat to national heritage possessions•Provide an 'authentic version' of Indian Intellectual heritage•A consortium approach in a collaborative and co-operative way between various resource centres and resource persons is suggested.•Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, Tirupati and Dept. of CSA, Indian Institute of Science, will be our partners
90
OBJECTIVES•Prepare authentic content on important but rare areas of traditional knowledge and wisdom contained in the ancient texts for use on web with retrieval features.•Derive the benefits of treasure of information hidden in the vast repositories of manuscripts•Train teachers, researchers, and students and lay public on the way to preserve, study, propagate, and benefit from these invaluable treasures.•Develop necessary technology, tools and utilities •Take pride in our heritage for selfless, historic contribution for centuries on medium lasting far longer than the creators, being ecologically the soundest alternative, for total harmony
91
DELIVERABLES•Setting up a National Resource Centre (NRC) for Sanskrit, Vedic and Manuscripts Processing including an Academy for Heritage Value Education and Training, as a Centre of Excellence for Research on Indian Knowledge Systems, i.e, CoE for RIKS•140 courses of 40 hrs. duration each, in Sanskrit medium, at PG Level in saturation mode
92
CoE for RIKS•IHG, C-DAC has produced sample applications for all the scholastic disciplines on Windows. This would be enhanced, vetted by domain experts and ported on to other computer platforms like Linux, MacOS etc.•Descriptive catalogs verification, updation, subject wise catalogs could be computerised, i.e., to provide search/index facility and experts enlisted would verify updation and creation of subject wise catalogs.
93
CoE for RIKS•Two major national initiatives i.e., NCC project at University of Madras and Sanskrit Dictionary project at Deccan College, Pune, would be provided with computational assistance programs, so that the benefit of these reference texts could be available to the users at the earliest.•Training programs at various levels and for different user community would be devised in the conventional/distance and e-learning modes to disseminate information and train research persons. E-learning mode would focus on multimedia and multilingual interactive programs.•Research, Development and Training will be three major streams of activities
94
CoE for RIKS•A dedicated national resource centre to find computational solutions to these issues. There will also be facilities to research into OCR, speech synthesis and recognition, leading to advancement of knowledge structures and integration.•Cognitive structure modelling studies from Shastras at top-level, Narratives leading to concepts at mid-level and tales/episodes etc. for starting level in translation would be developed for curriculum•Multi-media, animations, regional language renderings
95
CoE for RIKS•Modules of conceptual units, monograph series, practical applications etc.•Wiki approach would be nucleated with large participation from a wide cross-section for sources, pedia, codes etc.•Building reference lexicons - general and different domain-specific ones•Balance between engg., social and life sciences, fine arts, crafts under 64 kala-s
96
CoE for RIKS•LMS based learning systems with ‘ab initio’development of phonetic and spoken response assessment•OCR and Speech research for Sanskrit•Interactions thru' MoU, with various academic institutions like Universities, IGNCA, IGNOU, IISc, IITs, IIIT etc.
97
Training and Dissemination•Devise courses from lay person’s level to expert’s level, for appreciating value systems, principles behind knowledge classification schemes, characterization leading to a rationalistic identity.•Devise familiarization, basic and advanced level courses in Vedic, Shastraic and manuscript processing and research areas•Through contact, distance-learning and online modes•Manuscript course - certificate, diploma & PG degree•Resource-person training for special/national projects
98
Manuscript ProcessingTranscription and analysis•Persons working in library, manuscript resource repository centres, faculty of university language departments, pathashalas and other traditional (religious/spiritual) institutions could undergo specialized training programme•They will be guided through a well designed, practice-oriented hands-on training program, provided with advanced equipment and technology to confidently handle, publication or research or teaching assignments.
99
Resources•ManpowerTraditional Domain Experts to draw up contents for teaching, preparing content modules in 4-quadrant approach and delivering in video mode for online coursesTechnical team to implement course programme developing LMS like tools etc.•Infrastructure facility for recording, teaching and research activities•Proposal for tools and utilities development – Rs. 2.21 Crores, sent to DEITY, forwarded to NMEICT
100
Resources - Manpower•Technical – System development – three members•Domain/Linguistic expertise - Project Associates/Consultants - one each for Vedic, Shastras and Manuscripts•Co-ordination with partner institutions, MoU, online sysadm assistance and Secretarial assistance – one each•A team of about 10 persons
101
Resources - Equipment•Hardware/software for system software development and video lecture recording setup•Auditorium/Facility for imparting training, workshops etc. Initially NPTEL Studios to be used.•OCR/Speech research – project students /associates
102
Main Project TARKSHYA•Establishing CoE for RIKS at CSA, IISc, Bangalore•Continuing PG course content preparation, course design and implementing in partner institutions at various levels and streams•About 140 courses at PG level – 20 each in Nyaya, Vyakarana, Mimamsa, Vedanta, Veda-bhashya, Sahitya and Manuscripts [@Rs. 7 Lakhs per course]•Duration – 3 years; Total Budget – Rs. 9.8 Crores•Collaboration with RSV, Tirupati & Dept. of CSA, IISc, Bangalore
103
Main Project TARKSHYACourse Content Creation
•For all disciplines covering Shastras, Manuscripts and Vedic courses, at PG level.•Training resource persons, faculty•Helping content creation•LMS based Course Development•Various quadrants for Sanskrit – Web References, tools, demonstrations, application programs etc.•Research issues and projects
104
Disciplines at PG level•Mimamsa•Advaita Vedanta•Vishistadvaita Vedanta•Dvaita Vedanta•Navya-Nyaya•Puranetihasa•Dharma Shastra•Sankhya Yoga•Vyakaranam•Sahityam•Sahitya (kavya- varga)• (Alankara- varga)• (Natya- Varga)
105
Disciplines at PG level•Krishna Yajurveda Bhashya•Siddhanta Jyotisha•Phalita Jyotisha•Agama•Navya-Vyakaranam•Pracina-Vyakaranam•Sarva-darsana•Paurohityam•Jaina Darsana•Bauddha Darsana•Pracina-NyayaVaiseshika•Shukla YajurVeda•Veda•Prakrit 106
Disciplines at PG level•There are 5 papers per semester and in all 20 papers per PG discipline•We take up these 20 papers per discipline and revise to 4-quadrant mode•Universities/Institution faculty and experts would be involved in lecture and assessment quadrants, while CoE would do the rest of the activities like training, demos, programs, references, wiki etc.
107
Disciplines – moderated [PG level]•Mimamsa•Vedanta –Vishistadvaita•Vyakaranam – Pracina & Navya•Veda – Krishna Yajur Veda Bhashya•Sahitya - Kavya-varga•Nyaya-Vaiseshika•Advanced manuscriptology
108
Shastraic Processing•Scholarly expositions on शाब्दबोधमधाांा, धानधेय-रहसययबो-वा�तोा , ्शरनब्यय, वे् लक्-िं�ा�नध्, वे् ाधययनंवरसवा, वे् वे�्ोा, धातृोािव�ा ...•4-quadrant approach for Sanskrit/Vedic/manuscripts•Evaluation, Question Bank, Types of questions, references, transcripts etc.•Participation of Skt./Vedic institutions – resources/training•Manuscripts’ digitization, processing, publication [van for survey, scanning from remote places]
109
Views of Prof. KV RK Acharyulu, Ex-HoD, Vyakarana, RSVP, Tirupati & Ex-VC, JRRSU
•“It is no doubt a good project. Textual teaching, recording connecting the content and references and illustrations is one task. In addition to that, there should be discourses on topics giving different opinions of various shastrakaras giving the original texts as reference in a chronological manner. For this we can take "shabdabodhamimamsa" as an example. Consolidation of syllabi in each sastra is also required. There are recordings of some sastric texts in some institutions which can be utilized or edited as per the goal of the project. Hence getting information about the available content is the first task”.
110
Available content elsewhere•RSVP,T – Ford Foundation recording [90s]वे्ाङ्, शा��न् etc. [to deal with IPR issue]•RSVP,T – Current recording of texts like प�रभाषेन्दशेेरा, �दतपििवा्य etc.•RSkS – अ�ाधयायम, िं�ानतोकधद्म DVDs etc.•PPSM – Nyaya texts recording•E-texts at C-DAC, RSVT, RSkS campusesWe can enhance these contents further, proof read, annotate/tag etc. and use for training, continuation/completion, link reference etc.
111
Vedic Processing•Vedic syllabus – To devise afresh, from those of available institutions, for lakshana, anga and bhashya levels•ोृष्ययदवव् े षवययध ोाशनध्•ंाधवे्मय रा्ायन, यैिधनमय, शैलािल�ा�्ा�् ोाशनध् [Ref. http://www.parankusa.org]
•Cognitive content extraction, modelling and comparison of accents to speech research
112
Manuscripts Processing•Survey accessing remote areas for digitising rare, Vedic, medicinal and other S&T palm-leaf manuscripts - Van with satellite dish for it•Data storage infrastructure for scanned images•Devise and introduce an online training programme in rare scripts teaching and palm-leaf manuscript transcription, under NKN, as a model application and using DTH mode
113