This Isn't About Edward Snowden It's About the Other Traitors Still In the Roomby Revolution News. June 16, 2013 So let's review thenarrative as it standsregarding EdwardSnowden and see if we canfind the missing elephantin the room.Let's assume that the mostvile of human beings --onethat is not only a traitor, butalso thief and a liar and aburglar, a kidnapper, anarsonist and a rapist--proves to you and theworld that the following hashappened to you and yourfamily:

--A group of people arestalking you, collectingphotos, listening to,monitoring, recording andsaving your telephoneconversations, surfinghabits, and building a database and chart with everyone you know, interact with, whether your family, work, or acquaintances. In addition, your political and religious beliefs, where you shop, what you buy and even what you like to eat and what music you listen to and the books you read.

Now let's assume that you take the side of the people who call this hypothetical person a traitor, a thief and a liar and a burglar, and a kidnapper, and an arsonist and a rapist and that you agree with them, and further that this person should be tried and punished.

Good enough. That's one criminal down. Now what about the other one?

What other one?

Remember the other criminal that you now know is stalking you, collecting your photos, listening to calls and record your internet, social, shopping, political, and religious connections?

Yeah what about that criminal?

Because what's being overlooked quite purposefully in the media, on the Senate floor, and in the Oval Office is that there are two traitors in the room.Always remember that one traitor has outed the other.

And that other traitor? He (or they are) is desperately trying to airbrush themselves out of the room

before anyone notices. On that note, it can be said that only the mind of someone like that of a violent rapist or of a sexual predator (a sociopath or psychopath)would characterize and compare the physical andmental violation the mostintimate parts and recesses of a person mind and body as a balancing act between actual rape or molestation to a medical procedure that is

intended to detect and diagnose disease in his or her victim, and where the resulting emotional and physical scarring inflicted is nothing compared to the favor they did you.

Or the favor they claim to be doing for millions of victims so raped and molested, if in the process, theydo detect and discover some disease, and in so doing clothe themselves as worthy of pity, and all of us worthy of guilt and shame and perhaps punishment, for the thankless job we've forced them to perform over our bruised, bloodied and violated bodies and souls.

The ungrateful worms that we are.

We're supposed to lay back and enjoy it and thank them for it -- not ruin their special moment nor makethem feel guilty.

And so it is with the rape of our most intimateand private thoughts and words. We consider itas such not because there is something to hide,but because they are priceless and must beprotected from harm or misuse.

We would feel wrong to share them withanyone other than those we deeply trust andfurther, that we have found that they have not,nor would not take advantage, of our mostvulnerable moments to gain something at ourexpense, which it ultimately is at our expense,in the instant that our words and thoughts areextracted against our will, without ourknowledge and surely without our consent andused against us, to blackmail, coerce, ruin, orjail us, or to be used against those we love.And as we survey the landscape dotted withthe characters who have now revealedthemselves to have raped the products of ourhearts and minds, are we even able toretroactively absolve them of a crime because

they haven't taken advantage of us in any other way?

Would they have been worthy of our consideration for our most intimate thoughts and to have and hold the things we hold dear?

Would the rapist had been our friend underother circumstances if he or she had only courted us instead and won our trust and respect?

Or is our outrage justified because in addition, they've rifled through and spent all of our money? Because they've opened trillions in credit accounts in our names and hung us with the balance? Because they've audited and harassed people for their political beliefs? Arranged laws so that anyone can be detained without charge or trial?

Hadn't they already proven themselves to be abusive spouses or crooked business partners or lying, thieving employees, before they became leering, scheming eavesdroppers and peeping toms?

Hadn't they already failed the bare minimum tests you would have imposed on anyone you would remotely think of having sex with, or making love to, or sharing to deepest secrets with?

Then what makes them think this will be forgotten or forgiven?

What makes them think that any and all attorney's reading this won't be compelled to sue for records to prove that attorney client privilege has been in fact violated?

What makes them think that any and all physicians won't be compelled to sue for records to prove that doctor patient confidentiality has been in fact violated?

What makes them think that companies will not sue for having their trade secrets and business plans (recorded) stolen from them?What makes them think they canclaim they know all of our secrets,even some "crimes", but not beaware of their own "crimes" in theprocess of admitting to knowledgeof ours?

How can they claim to know allabout everyone to the exclusion ofthemselves?

How? By thinking like rapists andpredators and denouncing you asan ungrateful victim for the favorthey did you. That's how.

By believing their crimes to begifts while demanding you be anaccomplice to them by demandingyour silence .In the meantime,their claim of knowing all

convicts them of all, or do they think they would be immune to same rod being put to their backs that they have fashioned for ours?

They are now accomplices to everything including the real possibility that all this spying providesan ancillary benefit a something of a gateway drug: To the harder drug of blackmail.

You see, one chief advantage of the Executive being able to spy on everyone, including Senators, Congressmen, Governors, Generals, CEO's, of any party affiliation, etc., is that it's easy to blackmail them into submission and obedience or get rid of

them whenever you want. As you think about just how much spying was and is reportedly going on, think back over the last 10 years or so and recall just how many high profile people in the Federal (and State) government suddenly lost their jobs, decided to step down, or not run for office again, and had their reputations destroyed over "leaked" personal information that was embarrassing, or made them vulnerable, or got them ostracized.

It may help explain the behavior of those who are mysteriously (or maybe not so mysteriously?) currently and to your astonishment, defending the very system that they know for sure already spies on them, and most likely know has them blackmailed as well. It's said that in organized crime circles, the point is made to extract your obedience through complicity - which is to simply make you an accomplice to the crimes they commit- so that if they go down, you go down with them.

As a gateway drug then, spying opens a door to blackmail which has the power to silence anyone, and moreover to compel those under it's influence to defend it.

So to us it doesn’t matter who Snowden works for, or whether he’s coached or not, or whether somedayeven more heinous things about him are said. Hang him for it.

Because what matters Naomi is who this traitor or puppet, or whatever he is, exposed--- a room full of other traitors, who by the way nearly all Americans have come to see as puppets anyway.

And we can’t help but notice how little attention is being paid to paint them with that brush at all, except perhaps with a vanishing airbrush so they match the background of outrage directed at just Snowden (instead of including them) and disappearing in plain sight.

May you speak up about this false dichotomy and narrative before the conflation, discrediting and obfuscation take firm root in the public mind to the point where they no longer see a room full of traitors outed by another. It’s not about Snowden.

It’s about who and what Snowden exposed, and the power it has to silence anyone and extract their cooperation, regardless of their station or office.

www.infowars.com