this is a digital document from the collections of the...

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

For additional information about this document and the document conversion process, please contact WRDS at [email protected] and include the phrase

“Digital Documents” in your subject heading.

To view other documents please visit the WRDS Library online at: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu

Mailing Address: Water Resources Data System

University of Wyoming, Dept 3943 1000 E University Avenue

Laramie, WY 82071

Physical Address: Wyoming Hall, Room 249 University of Wyoming

Laramie, WY 82071

Phone: (307) 766-6651 Fax: (307) 766-3785

Funding for WRDS and the creation of this electronic document was provided by the Wyoming Water Development Commission

(http://wwdc.state.wy.us)

FINAL REPORT (CONTRACT FOR SERVICES NO RV052301/F )

TO

WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

FOR THE

ALPINE SPRING IRRIGATION SUPPLY PROJECT

OCTOBER, 2001

RIO VERDE ENGINEERING

CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS P.O. BOX 642

PINEDALE, WYOMING 82941 PHONE 307-367-2826

FAX 307-367-2546

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ......................... ............ .... . ..... ..... .... ...... .... ................................ ............ 1

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Task 1 Scoping and Project Meetings ................... ............................................. Task 2 Analysis of Raw Water Supply and Irrigation Alternatives .............. 4

Task 3 Designs and Cost Estimates .......... ..................... ..... ............................. 1 1

Task 4 Permit Requirements ............ .... .......... .............................. .... .. ............. 18

Task 5 Analysis of USFS Leaseluse Agreement .................... ........................I 9

Task 6 Economic Analysis and Project Financing ......................................... 20

Task 7 Environmental Report ................... ............................................ 3

Task 8 Project Reports ................. .... ..... ......................................... ...... . .... ...2 7

Task 9 Project Presentation and Public Hearing ...................... ............ .... . . . 7

APPENDIX

Little Jenny Lake Spring Area Plans ................. ............................... Appendix A

Irrigation Requirement Worksheets .......... ..... ............... .............. A p p e x B

Pipe Material Alternatives Cost Estimates........................... . . . . Appendix C

Modeling Results ................................................................................. A e n d D

Distribution System Plans .............. .................................................. Appendix E

Typical Sprinkler Plans ................................. ........... . . . . . . Appendix F

USFS LeaseIAgreement .... ................................................................ Appendix G

INTRODUCTION Background

The Alpine Water and Sewer District was formed in the early 1970’s and thereafter in

1974 the Mill Creek Springs system was installed to serve as a water source for the town.

In the summer of 1998, the water supply was contaminated with E. coli. The EPA

required the town to remove the spring from the distribution system unless the spring

water was treated. Costs to treat the spring water were determined to be excessive and

the town removed the spring from its water distribution system. The town is now

looking for ways to put this water to beneficial use by irrigating its 55 acres of parks and

other green areas. Use of the spring water would reduce the demand on the town’s

current potable water supply and distribution system.

The spring collection system is located at the confluence of two drainages near Little

Jenny Lake approximately 1 ½ miles southeast of Alpine. (See Topographic map,

Appendix D) There are a total of 24 springs, seven of which provide the majority of the

water, in the Little Jenny Lake area that are developed through a series of perforated 6-10

inch PVC pipes and spring boxes. The pipes and boxes are buried approximately 5 feet

deep and are set in such a manor as to facilitate drainage of the area and to divert the

water into a 50,000 gallon concrete tank. The 8-inch PVC transmission line runs from

the tank to a fire hydrant located on the Southeast end of the town of Alpine. Elevation

drop from the spring area to the fire hydrant is 229 feet, providing a static pressure at the

hydrant of 99.1 psi. This point will be the beginning of the irrigation distribution

system.

Water flows from the spring vary during the course of the year. Water rights

information indicates that 1.17 cfs was the measured tank inflow. Flows are at their

lowest during September and February. During the summer of 2000, which was a

drought year in the area, there were reported flows of 18,000 gallons/day in late August

and September. During dry periods there will be a need for supplemental water to

adequately irrigate the 55 acres of parks and greenways.

Soils in the area are classified as Hobacker gravelly loam. The soil is alluvium

material created as a result of the three nearby rivers. The Hobacker gravelly loam is

Page 1 of 27

typically a highly drained soil that will require a short duration and short interval

irrigation design. Sprinkler irrigation applications are well suited for these types of soils.

Project Objectives

The Rio Verde Engineering (RVE) team focused on those project items that were

defined during the scoping meetings on June 20 and on July 12, 2001.

Scoping Meeting Results

1. Rehabilitate Little Jenny Lake to provide wildlife/stock water 2. Use Potable Water System to supplement Raw Water Irrigation Supply

from the Spring Area. 3. Look at Fire Flow capabilities from the Spring Area 4. Look at irrigation water supply line to 55 acres of existing and

proposed parks and green areas.

The spring area, potential pipeline routes within the town limits, and potential areas of

irrigation were surveyed using GPS equipment. Plans were developed for the Little

Jenny Lake Spring Area to rehabilitate the existing dike in order to improve the

efficiency of the tank and springs and to provide water for wildlife. Irrigation

requirements were determined based on local soil types and the areas to be irrigated.

WATERCAD Water Distribution Modeling Software by Haested Methods was used to

model many different physical scenarios of water distribution systems.

Three of those scenarios were chosen as viable alternatives and these alternatives

along with cost estimates using three types of pipe material were presented to the Town

of Alpine. The alternative selected was a system that would provide Fire Flow down the

main line of the system. The Fire Flow alternative involved a 10-inch HDPE main line

with 8 and 4-inch secondary lines. Preliminary designs and cost estimates were

completed using this alternative.

Permit requirements and the USFS Lease/Use Agreement were evaluated and

assessed. An economic analysis was performed based on the design costs, potential

funding sources and grant loan scenarios. Environmental report consists of responses

from letters and maps sent to different agencies.

Final project reports are due on November 1, 2001. Key project personnel will assist

the WWDC in holding an informative public hearing in the Town of Alpine to present the

results of the study.

Page 2 of 27

SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 Scoping and Project Meetings

The first scoping meeting was held on June 20, 2001. Present at that meeting were

Karen Perry, Mayor of Alpine; Larry Colyar, Maintenance Director; Chris Abernathy,

Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC); Mark Eatinger, Rio Verde

Engineering (RVE); and Chad Espenscheid, RVE. During that meeting the Town of

Alpine specified some of the areas of concern and provided direction to the RVE team on

those areas that were important to them. At that meeting, it was decided that fire flow

possibilities should be included in the alternatives and that another meeting with the U. S.

Forest Service (USFS) and the Wyoming Game and Fish (Wyo G&F) would be set up to

discuss their concerns with the spring area. From discussions on raw water alternatives,

we were directed to concentrate on the spring system and supplemental supply from the

Town’s Potable Water System.

A second scoping meeting was held on July 12, 2001 involving the Little Jenny Lake

Spring Area. Present at that meeting were Gary Fralick, Wyo G&F Biologist; Karen

Perry, Mayor of Alpine; Chris Abernathy, WWDC; Mark Eatinger, RVE; Chad

Espenscheid, RVE; and Jack Doyle, RVE. This meeting was scheduled to enable the

USFS to be present, but no one from that office was able to attend. Representatives from

the USFS expressed a desire that the Wyo G&F be satisfied with any project involving

the spring area. At that meeting, it was decided that the RVE team would pursue design

of a dam with appropriate freeboard and spillway structures. Gary Fralick, Wyo G&F

indicated that they would like to see the designs include a way to maintain a certain

amount of water in Little Jenny Lake for wildlife use. Gary Fralick also thought he could

potentially gather some funding from other sources such as the Wyoming Game and Fish

Department and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation for the spring area development. The

final decision was that Gary Fralick would take the lead in this project and work with the

Town of Alpine and the USFS.

A third meeting was held on September 18, 2001 to discuss the distribution system

alternatives. Present at this meeting were Karen Perry, Mayor of Alpine, Chris

Abernathy, WWDC (via speaker phone), Mark Eatinger, RVE and Chad Espenscheid,

Page 3 of 27

RVE. The RVE team presented three different distribution systems, and discussed their

hydraulic characteristics, and associated costs using three different types of pipe material.

The purpose of this meeting was to provide information to the town in order that they

could make an informed decision as to the direction for the remainder of the project.

Since it was essential that a decision be made relatively quickly and that the town council

would actually have to make the decision, it was decided that the same presentation

would be made at the town council meeting that night. The RVE team again presented

and discussed the different alternatives and the decision was made by the council to

pursue the Fire Flow Alternative with HDPE pipe for further study, design and cost

analysis.

In the original scope of services and in our proposal several raw water supplemental

supply options were listed:

Recycling waste water

Gravity flow from Greys River

Pump from Greys River

Town’s Potable Water system

Recycling wastewater is a controversial subject due to the associated threat to public

health. Airborne pathogens are the greatest concern. Although national regulations

governing its use do not exist, several states have begun to write regulations that will

allow its use in restricted circumstances. (Small Flows Quarterly, Winter 2000, V. 2, No.

1). For this reason and the fact that water use from the treatment plant would have to be

pumped increasing costs, no further action was taken.

High costs of the other two alternatives when compared to the option of using the

Town’s Potable Water System as a supplemental supply was the reason that only the use

of the Town’s Potable Water System was explored and included in our design.

Task 2 Analysis of Raw Water Supply and Irrigation Alternatives

On July 23, 2001 the RVE team began surveying the area. The survey was done using

Trimble GPS equipment. All roadways, parks, potential pipeline alignments and the

Little Jenny Lake Area were surveyed. Approximately 7500 shots were taken and used

Page 4 of 27

as design information. The information was used to create surfaces for plan profile

design. The survey data was also used as input for the distribution model to ensure that

length and elevation dependant pressures were accurate.

Spring Area

As decided on the July 22 meeting, the RVE team investigated possible improvements

of the Jenny Lake Area. The existing dike that creates Little Jenny Lake is in poor

condition. No principal or emergency spillways exist which causes water from spring

snow melts to overtop the dike along the flow line of Mill Creek. Consequently, the

backside of the dike is severely eroded and the dike will eventually fail if no action is

taken. Further investigation has made it clear that the pond itself is constantly being

drained by the collection system. Water from the spring area and the upstream toe of the

dam flows to the tank where the excess water over flows back into Mill Creek below the

lake.

Little Jenny Lake and Spring Area in September

The proposed plan (see plans in Appendix A) involves an improved impoundment

structure which will repair the dam, and provide appropriate freeboard, and spillways

Page 5 of 27

which are all required by the State Engineer’s office. A floatation valve system will be

installed in the tank on the inlet pipe so that when the tank is full, the inflow will be shut

off whereby the system will not drain Little Jenny Lake. Water from the spring area will

flow into the lake instead of bypassing through the tank overflow, which will improve the

lake’s wildlife value and improve flow into the tank by using the lake area as storage

water.

The drainage area for Little Jenny Lake is 660 acres. Runoff from this area was

calculated from a 10 year-6 hour storm and a 100 year-6 hour storm using the US Army

Corps of Engineers’ Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS). A 10 year-6 hour storm

for the area produces 1.4 inches and a 100 year-6 hour storm produces 2 inches. Using

SCS methods, a 6-hour storm distribution, a lag time of 16 minutes, and a CN of 74, the

HEC-HMS model calculated a peak runoff of 20.77 cfs for the 10-year storm and 87.5 cfs

for the 100-year storm.

The proposed top of dam will be at elevation 5896.5 which will require the addition of

701 cubic yards of compacted fill material to the existing dam. The emergency spillway

width was calculated to be 12 feet in order to handle the 100-year storm runoff. For an

emergency spillway crest elevation of 5894.5, 336 cubic yards of excavation will be

required for the construction. By setting the water level in Little Jenny Lake at an

elevation of 5892, an Agri-Drain water level control structure will flow the peak

discharge produced by a 10-year storm. The remaining fill material for the dam will

come from a pit located up stream of the dam as shown on the plans. This pit will be

lined and covered with one foot of topsoil. The pit will provide water for wildlife

regardless of the irrigation system demands.

Irrigation Requirements

Local soil characteristics are the critical factor in efficient irrigation. According to the

1976 Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey for the Star Valley Area, most of the soil in

the area is classified as Hobacker gravelly loam. This soil provides moderate

permeability, slow runoff, and a slight erosion hazard. Hobacker soils are typically

highly drained and have a low soil moisture holding capacity. The most effective way to

irrigate these types of soils is through sprinkler irrigation. Highly drained soils require

short interval and short duration applications.

Page 6 of 27

SCS Soils Map

Irrigation Design Information (From the SCS Wyoming Irrigation Guide)

1. (Hc) Hobacker Gravelly Loam-

Slope 0-6%, Permeability is moderate, Runoff is slow, Erosion hazard

is slight, Root zone 60 inches, Best irrigated using sprinklers. Available

water holding capacity is 2 to 7 inches.

2. Growing season in the area is normally 154 days with a total estimated

consumptive use for grass of 15.33 in/year and an estimated peak

consumptive use of 4.24 inches during July.

Page 7 of 27

3. Soil Group No. 19- extraction depth 3.0 feet, Intake Family 2 in/hr,

Available Water Capacity ( AWC) = 3 in. Root zone for grass is

approximately three feet.

4. Application Rate

a. Climatic Area 4

b. Crop: grass (3ft root zone)

c. Soil Water Holding Capacity 3in/3ft = 1in/ft

d. Total Water Holding Capacity = 3 in

e. Available Water = 50%*3in = 1.5 in

f. Daily Peak Consumptive Use = 0.14 in/day

g. Irrigation Frequency = 1.5/0.14 = 10 days

h. Irrigation Efficiency = 65%

i. Application Rate = 1.5in/ 0.65 = 2.31 in

The irrigation requirement is 2.31 inches every 10 days. An Excel spreadsheet

formula was devised to calculate the required flow per square foot and per acre based on

2.31 inches every 10 days using irrigation durations of 6 hours, 10 hours and 20 hours

(See Appendix B, page 1). Worksheets were also developed using an irrigation

requirement of 1.15 inches every 5 days, which is the same requirement only applied in

two applications. Required flow per square foot and per acre was calculated for durations

of 6 hours, 10 hours and 15 hours.

Distribution System Alternatives

The irrigation requirements provide demands that can be used as input to the

distribution model. The system was modeled using WATERCAD: Water Distribution

Modeling Software by Haested Methods. WATERCAD is compatible with AutoCAD –

Computer Drafting Software. An electronic version of the town map was supplied to

RVE by the WWDC. With the town map displayed in AutoCAD, the distribution system

schematic can be drawn over the town map, which provides a scaled schematic ensuring

that our pipe lengths are accurate.

The WATERCAD schematic was initially drawn with a node near each area that

requires irrigation. Depending on the area of each park, roadway, town lot, school, etc., a

Page 8 of 27

demand was assigned to each node (see Appendix B, page 2). It quickly became

apparent in the modeling process that the system could not handle the large flows

required with the 10-day irrigation interval. Even using the 5 day irrigation interval and

WATERCAD Display Window

longer application durations, it was evident that the areas to be irrigated would need to be

divided into zones in order to achieve reasonable pipe sizes and pressures. Dividing the

town into zones reduces the amount of total flow by a factor of the number of zones.

After more modeling, the town was divided into 7 irrigation zones. Zones were chosen

based on geographic location within the town limits so that each zone had approximately

the same area to be irrigated (See Appendix B, page 2 and Appendix D, page 2). Using 7

zones, a 5-day irrigation interval , and application durations of either 6 hours or 10 hours,

several distribution scenarios were developed that would provide adequate flows and

Page 9 of 27

pressures at all of the junctions. The town requested that one design scenario provide fire

flow in the main parts of town.

After finding several physical and demand scenarios that would adequately carry the

desired flows and maintain pressures high enough to run a sprinkler system, looping

scenarios were investigated. Looping scenarios modeled were first a pipe from J-29 to J-

26 to J-23 and second a pipe joining J-29 to J-26 to J-23 to J-21 (See Appendix D, page

2). It was found during the modeling of looping scenarios that although looping did

stabilize the pressures throughout the system, it did not enable a reduction in the pipe

sizes, which would justify the additional costs of the added line quantities. Consequently,

looping scenarios were not included in the alternatives.

Three feasible distribution alternatives were presented to the Town of Alpine. (All

alternatives were modeled using the 5- day irrigation interval).

1. 10-inch Main Line - (this alternative is the one shown and color coded on the map

in Appendix D, page2). Physical Characteristics – 10-inch main line from the

existing fire hydrant to J-11(red line on map), 4-inch secondary lines (shown in

blue on map) and 8-inch lines for future expansions labeled P-12 and P-21. 10-

inch lines would need to be buried 6-feet or more to help prevent freezing in

winter and still provide fire flow. Hydraulic Characteristics - provides hydraulic

flexibility, allows zones 1, 2, 3, and 7 to be irrigated using 6-hour durations and

zones 4, 5, and 6 to be irrigated using 10 hour durations. All pressures at

discharge locations are 40 psi or greater. Allows for fire flows at junctions

throughout the main line from 1100 gpm to 1300 gpm while maintaining a system

pressure of not less than 20 psi (See Appendix D, page 3).

2. 6-inch Line Throughout - Physical Characteristics - All lines from existing fire

hydrant throughout the system are 6-inch lines. Lines to be set to drain in winter

with a minimum of 3 feet of cover. Hydraulic Characteristics - provides required

flows and adequate pressures at all discharge points. Each zone would require

irrigation using 10-hour durations. This alternative does not allow for fire flow.

3. 8-inch Main Line - Physical Characteristics - 8-inch main line and 6-inch

secondary lines set to drain in the winter with a minimum of 3 feet of cover.

Page 10 of 27

Hydraulic Characteristics - the most hydraulically flexible of the alternatives other

than it does not allow for fire flow. All zones can be irrigated using 6-hour or 10-

hour durations, which would provide pressures up to 90 psi. High pressures may

be desirable depending on sprinkler head patterns and associated costs of

sprinkler systems in larger park areas.

On September 18, 2001 the RVE team presented each of these three alternatives along

with associated costs using three different types of pipe material to the Alpine Town

Council (See cost estimates for each alternative as presented to the Town of Alpine in

Appendix C). The town chose Alternative One with HDPE pipe.

The main reason the Town of Alpine chose Alternative One is that they are on the US

Forest Service’s list of 1,000 towns that are “endangered” due to fire danger. Primary

reasons for selecting Alternative One are as follows:

Extra Fire Flow capabilities would be beneficial

Would provide Hydraulic flexibility for irrigation options.

Could be installed in phases

Would provide for future expansion

Task 3 Designs and Cost Estimates

Final Distribution Model and Supplemental Supply

Using the Town’s alternative selection of a 10-inch HDPE main line with 4-inch

HDPE secondary lines, a new model was developed. The new model schematic was

drawn over the rescaled digital town base map which ensured accurate pipe lengths and

elevations. Using the new model schematic, an extended period simulation was ran using

a 5 day period and 7 zones with their associated junction demands (See table in Appendix

B, page 3). Each zone’s irrigation duration was spread out through the 5-day irrigation

interval in such a manner as to irrigate at night and to allow time between zones for the

tank to recharge.

The extended period model allows the modeler to evaluate the tank status. As

expected, the tank water level decreases due to the high flows required to irrigate the

larger areas. Many variables are involved in the tank’s recovery.

Page 11 of 27

First, recovery depends on the actual amount of flow required to irrigate the Town’s

acreages. During the irrigation requirement calculations, some safety factor was built

into the areas used for modeling purposes in that there were no building or parking lot

areas removed. When these areas are developed, the amount of water needed will be less

than the demands used in the model. Irrigation water demands were calculated based on

peak consumptive uses in July. Consequently, the irrigation requirements will be less

late in the growing season and irrigation applications should be cut back accordingly.

Secondly, the flow rate coming from the spring collection system into the tank will

determine the tank’s ability to recover and supply irrigation. Zone One requires a flow

of 597.2 gpm. If there is no inflow to the tank, it will completely drain in 84 minutes,

which is only one quarter of the irrigation duration required. The tank inflow will

determine if and how fast the tank drains. Clearly, there is a need for supplemental water

supply during times of high irrigation use or times of low flow into the tank. Planned

improvements of Little Jenny Lake should increase flow to the tank. However, during

dry periods, there will inevitably be a shortage.

During the original scoping meeting with the Town of Alpine, it was decided that,

during those periods of low flow from the Little Jenny Lake Spring Area, the Town

Potable Water System would be used as the supplemental irrigation water supply. A

cross-connection between the two systems will be required in order to use potable water

to supplement the raw water for the irrigation water supply.

Doyle Conklin, DEQ - Lander, indicated that double backflow prevention would not

provide adequate safety from contamination given that the static pressure of the spring

water system is greater than that of the potable water system. Electronically operated

valves that are mutually exclusive, meaning that when one is off the other is on, would

improve the safety if used in conjunction with double backflow protection. Additional

protection may include an alarm system that activates on differential pressures.

All of the safety features would be installed inside a vault. The size required is 11 x

15 feet which allows for the size of the equipment required. Power, lights, and controls

will be in the vault. The ceiling and top four feet of the vault walls will be insulated with

four inches of spray foam to help maintain temperature inside the vault.

Page 12 of 27

The Town’s Potable Water System consists of one 500,000 tank that supplies most of

the town and all of the areas where the sprinkler systems would be installed and a

250,000 gallon tank that supplies the residents that live at higher elevations on the hill. A

well and pump system supplies and maintains water levels in the tanks. From the

500,000 gallon tank, a 10-inch PVC, 1500 feet long line runs to the Town’s Potable

Water distribution system. Knowing the elevation of the tank and the physical properties

of the pipeline this system was included in the model. The Town’s Potable Water System

needed to be modeled with the Spring Irrigation Distribution System to make sure that

the two systems were compatible. The model showed that both systems produced

adequate flows and pressures for the irrigation demands. In some zones, the pressures

were higher using the Spring System and in other zones the pressures were slightly higher

using the Town’s Potable Water System, but in general the pressures were similar from

node to node.

A series of control valves installed in a control building or vault will be necessary to

facilitate the continuous operation of the system. When the pressure at the Existing Fire

Hydrant (See map) falls to a certain level, indicating that the tank is empty, valves will

activate to allow the Town ‘s Potable Water System to supply the irrigation system until

the pressure at the Existing Fire Hydrant regains its maximum static level indicating that

the tank is full. Control valves were also modeled using WATERCAD.

Appendix D contains the map of the final distribution model as well as Junction

Reports that show pressures and demands for each zone within the 5-day extended period

simulation. Both systems were modeled and reported at different time steps to show the

working pressures for each of the seven zones. For example, Zone 1 is under irrigation at

hour 5 and a report is printed for both the Spring System and The Town System at hour 5.

The other zones are similarly reported (See Appendix D, Section 1).

Section 2 of Appendix D shows graphs that demonstrate how the two systems would

work together with control valves. The first graph represents the float valve system that

would regulate the flow into the tank from Little Jenny Lake. During periods of

irrigation or when the tank is not completely full, the tank inflow is 250 gpm and when

the tank is full the inflow is zero. The second graph is the modeled representation of the

tank level. It is either filling or draining depending on the irrigation demand throughout

Page 13 of 27

the 5 day extended period simulation. The third graph shows the discharge through the

existing 8” PVC pipe coming from the Little Jenny Lake Spring Area. The fourth graph

shows the discharge through the 10” line coming from the Town’s Potable Water System.

As long as the tank is not empty, the system runs on the Spring System. When the tank

empties, the Town’s Potable Water System kicks on and the Spring System shuts off until

the tank fills completely. By looking at these four graphs and the offsetting cycles it can

be seen how these systems will work together. The number of times the system switches

between the Town’s Potable Water System and the Spring System depends on the inflow

to the tank.

Section 3 of Appendix D contains a Fire Flow Analysis for each system. A separate

model was developed to predict the Fire Flow at each proposed hydrant location along

the main line. Ten fire hydrants were included along the main line and were spaced

strategically in places where there were not existing fire hydrants. By cross-connecting

the irrigation distribution system to the Town Potable Water System, the benefit of the

fire flow alternative is increased since this system can provide fire flows from 1400 gpm

up to 2500 gpm for longer periods of time.

The following is the cost estimate for the proposed Little Jenny Lake Spring Area

improvements as shown on the plans in Appendix A.

Little Jenny Lake Spring Area Preparation of Final Designs and Specifications $900.00Water Rights $1,500.00Permitting and Mitigation $969.00Legal Fees $100.00Acquisition of Access and Rights-of-Way $500.00 Work or Material Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount Mobilization 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Topsoil Removal and Replace 150 CY $5.00 $750.00 Unclassified Excavation 770 CY $4.00 $3,080.00 Compacted Fill 770 CY $8.00 $6,160.00 Water Level Structure 1 EA $2,200.00 $2,200.00 24" HDPE Pipe 60 LF $100.00 $6,000.00 Riprap 10 CY $50.00 $500.00 Rodent Screen 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 20 Mil Reinforced Pond Liner 5000 SF $1.00 $5,000.00

Page 14 of 27

Tank Float 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 Subtotal = $29,690.00 Eng. 10%= $2,969.00 Subtotal = $32,659.00 Cont. 15% = $4,898.85 Const. Cost Total = $37,557.85 Total Project Cost = $41,526.85

The following is the cost estimate for the proposed irrigation distribution system as

shown on the plans in Appendix E.

Spring Irrigation Distribution System Preparation of Final Designs and Specifications $45,000.00Water Rights $5,000.00Permitting and Mitigation $1,000.00Legal Fees $100.00Acquisition of Access and Rights-of-Way $500.00 Work or Material Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount MOBILIZATION 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 10" HDPE PIPE - SDR 11 9,570 LF $24.00 $229,680.00 8" HDPE PIPE - SDR 11 1,470 LF $20.00 $29,400.00 4" HDPE PIPE - SDR 11 7,610 LF $8.00 $60,880.00 10" GATE VALVE 9 EA $1,155.00 $10,395.00 8" GATE VALVE 4 EA $885.00 $3,540.00 4" GATE VALVE 10 EA $490.00 $4,900.00 10" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 21 EA $156.00 $3,276.00 8" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 7 EA $130.00 $910.00 4" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 31 LS $54.00 $1,674.00 10"x10"x8" HDPE TEE 1 EA $430.00 $430.00 10"x8"x10" HDPE TEE 1 EA $430.00 $430.00 8"x10" HDPE REDUCER 3 EA $180.00 $540.00 8" HDPE 90 ELBOW 1 EA $250.00 $250.00 4"x4"x4" HDPE TEE 3 EA $90.00 $270.00 8" BLIND FLANGE 2 EA $35.00 $70.00 4" BLIND FLANGE 9 EA $35.00 $315.00 8" PVC TO FLANGE ADAPTOR 2 EA $150.00 $300.00 4" HDPE BRANCH SADDLES 6 EA $50.00 $300.00 11'x15' VAULT COMPLETE 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 TIE TO EXISTING 8" LINE 2 LS $1,500.00 $3,000.00 TIE TO EXISTING 4" LINE 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 8" BACKFLOW 2 EA $500.00 $1,000.00 10" VALVE GEAR BOX 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Page 15 of 27

8" VALVE GEAR BOX 1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3/4" HDPE SADDLE 24 EA $20.00 $480.00 3/4" STOP & WASTE VALVE 12 EA $40.00 $480.00 BUFFALO BOX 12 EA $80.00 $960.00 3/4" AIR VAC VALVE 12 EA $100.00 $1,200.00 3/4" HDPE TO NPT 12 EA $25.00 $300.00 FIRE HYDRANT COMPLETE 10 EA $3,500.00 $35,000.00 LINE LOCATE WIRE 20500 LF $0.10 $2,050.00 VALVE BOX COMPLETE 12 EA $100.00 $1,200.00 HIGHWAY REPAIR(CONCRETE) 28.7 CY $300.00 $8,610.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 BLEEDER VLVS & INFILTRATION SYS 2 LS $8,000.00 $16,000.00 8" WATER METER 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 BLUE BOARD UNDER APPROACHES 53 EA $200.00 $10,600.00 Subtotal = $537,440.00 Eng. 10%= $53,744.00 Subtotal = $591,184.00

Cont. 15% = $88,677.60

Const. Cost Total = $679,861.60 Total Project Cost = $731,461.60

Each individual sprinkler system will need to be designed on a case-by-case basis to

fit the improvements of a particular area. The following are cost estimates of typical

sprinkler layouts as shown in Appendix F.

200' x200' Sprinkler Design Cost Estimate Preparation of Final Designs and Specifications $779.18 Work or Material Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount Mobilization 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Rain Bird R-50 Sprinkler Head 36 EA $9.48 $341.28 3/4" Head Connection Assembly 36 EA $1.85 $66.60 3" Electronic Control Valves 2 EA $140.00 $280.00 4" Tee 1 EA $7.99 $7.99 3" x 4" Reducer 2 EA $1.59 $3.18 3" PVC Line 120 LF $1.00 $120.00 3" x 2" Reducer 6 EA $1.18 $7.08 3" Tee 4 EA $5.50 $22.00 2" Tee 16 EA $1.19 $19.04 2" Elbow 2 EA $1.09 $2.18 2"x1.5" Reducer 6 EA $0.69 $4.14

Page 16 of 27

2" PVC Line 320 LF $0.48 $153.60 1.5" Tee 11 EA $0.79 $8.69 1.5" PVC Line 480 LF $0.39 $187.20 1.5" x 1.25" Reducer 2 EA $0.43 $0.86 1.25" Tee 2 EA $0.65 $1.30 1.25" PVC Line 80 LF $0.36 $28.80 1.25" x 1" Reducer 2 EA $0.40 $0.80 1.5" x 1" Reducer 4 EA $0.43 $1.72 1" Tee 8 EA $0.43 $3.44 1" Elbow 2 EA $0.31 $0.62 1" PVC Line 520 LF $0.28 $145.60 ESP-12X Controller 1 EA $175.00 $175.00 Control Pedestal 1 EA $175.00 $175.00 Air Blow Out Valves 2 EA $17.86 $35.72 Installation 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Subtotal = $7,791.84 Eng. 10%= $779.18 Subtotal = $8,571.02 Cont. 15% = $1,285.65 Const. Cost Total = $9,856.68 Total Project Cost = $10,635.86

80' x160' Roadway Sprinkler Design Cost Estimate Preparation of Final Designs and Specifications $545.20 Work or Material Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount Mobilization 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Rain Bird R-50 Sprinkler Head 15 EA $9.48 $142.20 3/4" Head Connection Assembly 15 EA $1.85 $27.75 3" Electronic Control Valves 1 EA $140.00 $140.00 3" PVC Line 10 LF $1.00 $10.00 3" x 2" Reducer 2 EA $1.18 $2.36 3" Tee 1 EA $5.50 $5.50 2" Tee 3 EA $1.19 $3.57 2"x1.5" Reducer 2 EA $0.69 $1.38 2" PVC Line 120 LF $0.48 $57.60 1.5" Elbow 1 LF $0.45 $0.45 1.5" Tee 4 EA $0.79 $3.16 1.5" PVC Line 160 LF $0.39 $62.40 1.5" x 1.25" Reducer 3 EA $0.43 $1.29 1.25" Tee 4 EA $0.65 $2.60 1.25" PVC Line 160 LF $0.36 $57.60 1.25" x 1" Reducer 2 EA $0.40 $0.80 1.5" x 1" Reducer 1 EA $0.43 $0.43

Page 17 of 27

1" Tee 4 EA $0.43 $1.72 1" Elbow 2 EA $0.31 $0.62 1" PVC Line 160 LF $0.28 $44.80 ESP-12X Controller 1 EA $175.00 $175.00 Control Pedestal 1 EA $175.00 $175.00 Air Blow Out Valves 2 EA $17.86 $35.72 Installation 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Subtotal = $5,451.95 Eng. 10%= $545.20 Subtotal = $5,997.15 Cont. 15% = $899.57 Const. Cost Total = $6,896.72 Total Project Cost = $7,441.91

Total Estimated Costs of Sprinkler System Installation Roadway Acres Cost/Acre Total Unimproved Roadway 14 $ 24,835.70 $ 347,699.80 Other Areas Unimproved Parks etc. 35.79 $ 11,172.85 $ 399,876.30

Task 4 Permit Requirements

Little Jenny Lake Improvements

Two additional permit requirements will need to be addressed prior to construction of

the Little Jenny Lake Improvements. The USFS Lease/Use Agreement is covered under

Task 5 below. Wetlands and water rights permits will need to be obtained. Given the

size of the disturbed area, it will not be necessary to obtain a National Pollutant

Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.

In order to rehabilitate the dam at Little Jenny Lake, wetlands will need to be filled

which will require a Corps of Engineer's (COE) permit. Restoration of an existing dam

falls under Wyoming State Permit 9701. Preliminary calculations indicate that between

0.1 and 0.2 acres of wetlands will be filled. A COE permit should be obtainable.

A review of the water rights indicates that no storage in Little Jenny Lake was

included in the first enlargement filed with the State Engineer's office. A separate water

Page 18 of 27

rights filing on the water storage in Little Jenny Lake would be our recommended

approach. A separate filing would not affect their current water rights, yet would allow

the town the right to drain all but the pit through their spring collection system.

Alpine Spring Irrigation Supply Project

Several permit requirements will need to be addressed for the irrigation supply project.

Highway department, water rights, and NPDES permits will need to be obtained.

Wetlands are not an issue and the USFS Lease/Use Agreement is covered in Task 5

below.

Two Wyoming Department of Transportation permits will be required. The first

permit is actually an easement that allows the placement of the 10-inch line in the

highway right-of-way. The second permit allows construction within the highway right-

of-way. Specific line locations and construction plans will be required to obtain these

permits. Safety of the general public during construction will be a primary concern of the

Highway Department.

Page two of two from the water right filing of the “Map to Accompany Application

for First Enlargement of the Alpine Water and Sewer District Pipeline” shows the potable

water system for the Town of Alpine at the time of filing in 1988. The town limits and

locations of the irrigation supply lines will need changed.

The cross-connection will require a Permit to Construct from the Wyoming

Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division.

Finally, an NPDES permit will need to be obtained by the contractor for the phase of

the project under construction.

Task 5 Analysis of USFS Lease/Use Agreement

United States Forest Service issued a Special-Use Permit on October 21, 1976 to

the Alpine Water and Sewer District. The last Special-Use Permit was issued

(transferred) to the Town of Alpine on January 12, 1996 which expires on December 31,

2016. This permit was issued for the purpose of construction and maintenance of a water

system for the Town of Alpine, including the following:

Existing Improvements

1. Spring collection system

Page 19 of 27

2. 1.8 miles of transmission line from the spring to town

3. Two wells with submersible electric pumps

4. An 18'x24' chlorination building

Additional Improvements

5. Addition to building

6. Water storage tank (500,000 gallon), 1000' access road

7. Water storage tank (250,000 gallon), 550’ access road

8. 2100' of 6", 8" and 10" diameter transmission line and 2100'

telemetry cable

The purpose stated above - Construction and maintenance of a water system - should

include potable or irrigation water systems.

Analysis of the current Special-Use Permit indicates that construction of either the

Little Jenny Lake Spring Area Improvements or the Spring Irrigation Distribution System

Project will require that a new permit or a permit amendment be obtained. The Special-

Use Permit for the Little Jenny Lake Spring Area Improvements may be between the

Town of Alpine or the Wyo G&F and the USFS depending on how the project is

structured and how the maintenance is addressed. An amendment to the current permit

between the Town of Alpine and the USFS will be required to add improvements under

the Alpine Spring Irrigation Project that fall south of the town limits on USFS lands. The

improvements are the installation of a new 10-inch HDPE pipe and a vault which will be

used to incorporate the cross-connection between the Town Potable Water System and

the Spring Irrigation Distribution System.

Task 6 Economic Analysis and Project Financing

Funding sources are always an issue with small communities like the Town of Alpine.

The following contacts were made in regards to funding possibilities for this project:

• Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) Chris Abernathy 307-777-7626 • Office of State Lands and Investments (OSL) Brad Miskimins 307-777-7331 • Western Wyoming Resource Conservation & Development Area (RC&D) Kirk Heaton 307-382-3982

Page 20 of 27

• Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Brian Mark 307-777-6371 • United States Department of Agriculture - Rural Developement Linda Ziegler 307-886-9001 Ext. 4 • Lincoln County Mary Crosby 307-877-3984

Both projects are eligible for funding by the WWDC. Funding would be 50 percent

grant and 50 percent loan for the eligible portions of the projects. Note that fire hydrants

are not eligible. The loan portion has an interest rate of 7.25 percent for a period of 20 or

30 years.

Project Financing Costs Projected to 2003 dollars at = 5.00% per year Loan Interest Rate = 7.25% per year Estimated Estimated 20 Yr Pymt 30 Yr Pymt

Project Cost 2001 Cost 2003 50/50 Split Per Month Per MonthLittle Jenny Lake Spring Area $41,526.85 $45,783.35 $22,891.68 $180.93 $156.16 Spring Irrigation Distribution Sys. $696,461.60 $767,848.91 $383,924.46 $3,034.45 $2,619.04 ( Without Fire Hydrants) Totals $737,988.45 $813,632.27 $406,816.13 $3,215.38 $2,775.20

Fire hydrants are not eligible for WWDC funding, but funding should be available for

this through other sources since the Town of Alpine can show a need for fire protection.

The interest rate is dependent on what funding source is used. If the town acquires a

50/50 grant/loan on the fire hydrants, the payment for a thirty year loan at 7.25% on 50%

of $38,587.5 (2003 dollars) is $131.62 per month.

Neither project is eligible for funding by the OSL under the mineral royalty grant

because a funding requirement is that the project be for an essential public service.

However, the fire hydrants would be eligible for funding under this program for a 50/50

grant/loan. A state loan program may be available as a funding source in general at an

interest rate of 7.25 percent with a one percent origination fee. The main requirement is

that the Town of Alpine prove that they have a revenue source for repayment.

Page 21 of 27

Kirk Heaton with RC&D said that no funds were currently available. He will continue

to help the Town of Alpine with the project and will keep the town informed if funding

becomes available in the future.

An application form from the Wyoming State Forestry Division was forwarded to us

by Kirk Heaton. The deadline for the application is October 5, 2001. The contract

person is:

Western Wildland Urban Interface Grant Program

Ray A. Weidenhaft

307-777-5842

DEQ does not appear to be a funding source for these projects. However, Brian Mark

indicated that the final answer from the EPA had not been received.

The United States Department of Agriculture may be a funding source through their

RUS or RHS Community Facilities programs. They offer grants and loans to small rural

communities. Grant funding projects are selected on a priority point system. Projects

that will be chosen first are those that are under 5000 in population and those having

median household incomes below the higher of the poverty line or 60% of the State non-

metropolitan median household income. Their community facility loan program offers

loans at an interest rate of 5.125 percent for a maximum of 40 years. Requirements are

that the life of the loan does not exceed the useful life of the project, that the statute

limitation of the borrowing agency not be exceeded, and that the ranking of the project

against other applications allow funding from the available dollars. Part of the ranking is

based on whether the need is life threatening.

Operations and Maintenance (O&M)

O & M for the Little Jenny Lake Improvements and the Alpine Spring Irrigation

Supply include the following items:

• Check the principal spillway at Little Jenny Lake twice yearly in early spring and mid summer.

• Check the tank and overflow. • Operate and flush all hydrants twice yearly. • Cleanout valve boxes and operate valves twice yearly. • Check the vault and controls. - Check that the valves operate properly.

- Check the backflow prevention. - Check alarm system.

Page 22 of 27

• Check and operate all stop and waste valves. • Check all end-of-line boxes and operate drain valves. • Drain 4-inch lines prior to ground frost by opening all stop and waste and

drain valves. • Prior to ground frost, open bleeder valves.

O & M for the items listed above is estimated at $200 per month

Tap Fee

An alternate source of funding for the Alpine Spring Irrigation Supply Project may be

realized by allowing residents to tap into the system for irrigation of their lots. The

current Town Limits consists of approximately 664 lots. Based on our estimate of the

project costs, we believe that potential users should be responsible for a one time Tap Fee

of $1,000 and additional costs required to pipe irrigation water to the desired point of use.

Also, each current water user’s monthly bill of $25 will need to be increased by $10.36 to

cover the monthly payments and the O & M costs that the town will incur upon

completion of this project. This figure was based on the number of the Town’s current

water user accounts of 300, a monthly payment of $2775.20, a monthly payment of

131.62 for the fire hydrants and a $200 per month O & M cost. This fee assumes that all

water used is from the Spring System. Adjustments may need to be made to the user fee

once a track history is created on the amount of potable water required to support the

Spring Supply.

Task 7 Environmental Report

Separate letters were sent for the Little Jenny Lake Improvements and the Alpine

Spring Irrigation Supply Project to the following State and Federal regulatory agencies:

• State Historic Preservation Office

• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

• Natural Resources Conservation Service

• USFS - Bridger Teton National Forest

• DEQ, Water Quality Division

• DEQ, Air Quality Division

• Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Page 23 of 27

Sample letters were supplied, with contact names and addresses, by Chris Abernathy,

WWDC. Letters were not sent to the Local Flood Plain Administrator because flood

plains are not an issue with either project.

Town of Alpine

Little Jenny Lake Spring Area

Infared Image of Alpine and Spring Area

Answers that have been received from the letters are as follows:

• State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) -

No known cultural sites exist in the Little Jenny Lake Area. However, a

Cultural Resource Survey and mitigation would be required prior to final

comments.

SHPO project control number 1001TLG044

Judy Wolf, Review Compliance Project Manager (307) 777-6311

Page 24 of 27

The Astorian Monument is located within the proposed project boundary

of the Spring Irrigation Distribution System. Prior to any ground

disturbing activity, an on-site cultural resource survey meeting the

Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Archaeology and Historic

Preservation (48FR44716) should be conducted and adverse impacts to

any significant cultural resource sites must be mitigated.

SHPO project control number #1001TLG137

Mary M. Hopkins, Deputy (307) 766-5324

• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service –

No Answers to the letter were received.

• Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) –

Because there is no prime farmland in Lincoln County, the NRCS has no

concerns pertinent to the Farmland Protection Privacy Act.

Dan Holden, Resource Conservationist

• USFS – Bridger Teton National Forest

No answers to the letters were received.

• DEQ, Water Quality Division (WQD) – Letters received from the WQD

mentioned three permits that are required for projects in general.

Temporary Discharge Permit - This permit is required for any discharge

to “waters of the state” which may include flushing of the irrigation supply

lines to dry draws. This permit will not be required for the Little Jenny

Lake Spring Area project.

Storm Water Associated with Construction Activities - This permit is

required anytime the project disturbance is five acres or more. Depending

on the size of the phases for the Alpine Spring Irrigation Supply project,

this permit may or may not be required. The Little Jenny Lake Spring

Area Project will not require this permit because the disturbance is less

than five acres.

Permit to Construct – This permit is required from WQD anytime that a

public water system is constructed, installed or modified. The cross-

connection between the raw and potable water systems will require a

Page 25 of 27

Permit to Construct from WQD. The Little Jenny Lake Spring Area

project will not require this permit.

Section 404 – This permit was mentioned by WQD as required by the

COE not by WQD. As stated elsewhere in this report, the little Jenny

Lake Project will require a 404 permit. The Spring Irrigation Distribution

System will not require a 404 permit.

Jeremy Lyon, Environmental Senior Analyst, (307) 777-7588

• DEQ – Air Quality Division –

No permits are required for either project. However, compliance with the

general opacity and public nuisance standards is required. This consists of

minimizing fugitive dust emissions during construction by use of a water

truck when necessary. The letter also indicated that diesel generators

should not be left running all night, if not absolutely necessary. Diesel

generators should not be required for either project.

• Wyoming Game and Fish Department –

No concerns from the Wyoming Game and Fish were listed for the Spring

Irrigation Distribution System.

Their concerns regarding the Little Jenny Lake Spring Area are as follows:

Right of way for the project including the existing facilities will

need to be addressed through a modification of the Special-Use

Permit. The modification will include the Little Jenny Lake Spring

Area improvements. Wildlife issues consist of the balance of the

letter because the Wyoming Game and Fish has wildlife

management authority for the project area within the USFS

boundary. The Little Jenny Lake vicinity is crucial

winter/yearlong range and a vital parturition area. The Wyoming

Game and Fish supports the construction of the Little Jenny Lake

Spring Area improvements. However, construction should occur

in the time frame between May 15 and August 31 to minimize the

wildlife disturbance. Further mention is made of the time frame

between November 1 and May 1 when human activity should be

Page 26 of 27

prohibited to protect the wildlife use of the area. A

recommendation is made by the Wyoming Game and Fish that the

road into the area should be closed to all but administrative traffic.

Although fencing is mentioned, no additional fencing is proposed.

Fencing around the spring area is adequate and will be left in

place.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State Engineer's Office were not sent letters.

However, the issues are appropriately addressed elsewhere in this report.

Task 8 Project Reports

Final project reports are due on November 1, 2001. Task 9 Project Presentation and Public Hearing

Key project personnel will assist the WWDC in holding an informative public meeting

in the Town of Alpine to present the results of the study. The Rio Verde Engineering

team will provide the required visual and informative aids as developed after consultation

with the WWDC. We will also present the project results to the WWDC in Cheyenne.

Page 27 of 27

EXISTING SPRING AREA PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1" = 60'

TANK

PROPOSED EARTH DAM TOP OF DAM EL 5896.5

701 CU YDS AFTER TOP SOIL REMOVAL

LITTLE JENNY LAKE HWL EL 5892

PIT EXCAVATED AND LINED, BASE ELEVATION 5885 BASE AREA 1031 SO F l 3:1 CUT SLOPES 3 6 5 CU YDS

PLAN VIEW OF PROPOSED DAM SCALE: 1" = 60'

i

FLOTATION VALVE SYSTEM EXISTING GROUND LINE 1 TO PREVENT WATER FROM

FLOWING FROM LITTLE JENNY LAKE WHEN TANK IS FULL *-j

I EXISTING 50.000 GALLON TANK I 120' TO DAM

PROFILE Q PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY STA 0+57

NOT TO SCALE

5900

5895 EL 5894.2-

5890

5885

DATUM EMV 5880.00

O+OO 0+50 1 +OO 1 +50 2+00

PROFILE ON Q EMERGENCY SPILLWAY NOT TO SCALE

PROFILE ON Q DAM NOT TO SCALE

Irrigation Application Rate Work Sheet (10 day interval) Gross Irrigation Requirement = 2.31 in Assumed Application Duration 6 hr Application Rate = 0.385 in/hr Flow Requirement per sq. A. = 0.004 gpdsq ft Flow Requirement per acre = 1 74.23 gpdacre

Irrigation Application Rate Work Sheet (1 0 day interval) Gross Irrigation Requirement = 2.31 in Assumed Application Duration 10 hr Application Rate = 0.231 in/hr Flow Requirement per sq. A. = 0.0024 gpdsq A Flow Requirement per acre = 104.54 gpdacre

Irrigation Application Rate Work Sheet (1 0 day interval) Gross Irrigation Requirement = 2.31 in Assumed Application Duration 20 hr Application Rate = 0.1155 in/hr Flow Requirement per sq. ft. = 0.0012 gpdsq A Flow Requirement per acre = 52.27 gpdacre

Irrigation Application Rate Work Sheet (5 day interval] Gross Irrigation Requirement = 1.15 in Assumed Application Duration 6 h r Application Rate = 0.19167 idhr Flow Requirement per sq. ft. = 0.001 99 gpdsq ft Flow Requirement per acre = 86.74 gpdacre

Irrigation Application Rate Work Sheet (5 day interval) Gross Irrigation Requirement = 1.15 in Assumed Application Duration 10 hr Application Rate = 0.115 in/hr Flow Requirement per sq. fi. = 0.001 19 gpdsq ft Flow Requirement per acre = 52.04 gpdacre

Irrigation Application Rate Work Sheet (5 day interval) Gross Irrigation Requirement = 1.15 in ~ssurned Application Duration 15 hr Application Rate = 0.07667 in/hr Flow Requirement per sq. ft. = 0.0008 gpdsq A Flow Requirement per acre = 34.69 gpdacre

Demand Pattern 5 Day Duration

Day Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

(7 Zones) 'ime ~ t e d Time I ~ p p . ~uration 1 Zone

0 12:OOAM to 6 Hours 6 6:00 PM Zone 1 18 6:00 PM to 6 Hours 24 12:OOAM Zone 2 24 12:OOAM to 6 Hours 30 6:OO AM Zone 3 46 10:OO PM to 10 Hours 56 8:OO AM Zone 4 70 10:OO PM to 10 Hours 80 8:OO AM Zone 5 92 8:00 PM to 10 Hours 102 6:OOAM Zone 6 114 6:OOPM to 6 Hours 120 12:OO AM Zone 7

Demand Distribution

Zone I Area I Sq Ft I~cres(~ota1 Zone 1 Town Park 42073.8 0.97

Alpine Circle 1 7 1 524.6 3.94 Children's Park 86480.16 1.99 6.89

Junction

Zone 2 Roadway 2 2 29320.6 36459

32686.24 39720.86

61415 8676.7

55 184.26 50867 57597

Zone 3 Roadway Z-3 661 56.6 54877.27 2984 1.2 82040.9

I 53996

Medical Clinic 43 5 80 Zone 4 Palisades Park 33470

Riverview 171439.4 L Park 78843.7

Future School 124164.7 2.85 Library 35805.1 0.82

1 Town 30229.9 0.69 7.42 --

[Zone 7 Rec Area 1058 14.6 2.43 Future School 129 107.3 2.96 Fire Station 123217.2 2.83 8.22

TOWN OF ALPINE IRRIGATION SUPPLY PROJECT

PlPE MATERIAL COMPARISON PER FOOT INSTALLED COST

PIPE MATERIAL

HDPE

PVC

D I

10"

24.00

27.00

35.00

8"

15.00

17.00

22.00

6"

9.00

11.00

17.00

4"

7.00

9.00

16.00

PlPE MATERIAL COMPARISON 6" MAIN WlTH 4" STUB LINES

INSTALLED COST

SCENARIO: 6-INCH WlTH 4" STUB LINES

PlPE MATERIAL

HDPE 10" 8" 6" 4"

PVC 10" 8" 6" 4"

D I 10" 8" 6'' 4"

QUANTITY

15,284.00 2,976.00

15,284.00 2,976.00

15,284.00 2,976.00

ITEM NO. I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I 1 12 13 13

UNlT

LF LF LF LF

LF LF LF LF

LF LF LF LF

- I 90,308.00

ENGINEERING @ 20% 38,061.60 CONTINGENCY @ 15% 28,546.20

TOTAL 256,915.80

AMOUNT 20,000.00

137,556.00 20,832.00 5,100.00 1,960.00

500.00 1,680.00

240.00 200.00 600.00 140.00

1,500.00 82.00

328.00

DESCRIPTION MOBILIZATION 6" HDPE PIPE 4" HDPE PIPE 6 GATEVALVE 4" GATEVALVE 6"X6"x6" HDPETEE 6" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 6" BLIND FLANGE 4" HOPE BRANCH SADDLES 4" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 4" BLIND FLANGE TIE TO EXISTING 8" LINE 6" HDPE 90 ELBOW 6" HDPE 45 ELBOW

UNIT COST'

24.00 15.00 9.00 7.00

27.00 17.00 11.00 9.00

35.00 22.00 17.00 16.00

QUANTITY I

15,284 2,976

10 4 5

24 6 4

12 4 I 1 4

AMOUNT

137,556.00 20,832.00

168,124.00 26,784.00

259,828.00 47,616.00

AMOUNT

1 58,388.00

194,908.00

307,444.00

UNIT LS LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA LS EA EA

UNIT COST 20,000.00

9.00 7.00

510.00 490.00 100.00 70.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 35.00

1,500.00 82.00 82.00

PlPE MATERlAL COMPARISON 8" MAIN WlTH 6" AND 4" STUB LINES

INSTALLED COST

SCENARIO: 8" MAIN WlTH 6" AND 4" STUB LINES

L

ITEM NO.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

PlPE MATERIAL

HDPE 10" 8" 6" 4"

PVC 10" 8" 6" 4"

Dl 10" 8" 6" 4"

AMOUNT

146,520.00 49,644.00 20,832.00

166,056.00 60,676.00 26,784.00

214,896.00 93,772.00 47,616.00

DESCRIPTION MOBILIZATION 8"HDPEPlPE 6" HDPE PIPE 4" HDPE PIPE 8" GATE VALVE 6" GATE VALVE 4" GATEVALVE 6"~6'"x6" HDPE TEE 8"~8"x6" HDPE TEE 8"X6"x6"HDPETEE 8W"DPE REDUCER 8" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 6" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 6" BLIND FLANGE 4" HDPE BRANCH SADDLES 4" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 4" BLIND FLANGE TIE TO EXISTING 8" LINE 6" HDPE 90 ELBOW 8" HDPE 45 ELBOW 6" HDPE 45 ELBOW

SUBTOTAL

AMOUNT

216,996.00

253,516.00

356,284.00

UNlT COST

24.00 15.00 9.00 7.00

27.00 17.00 11.00 9.00

35.00 22.00 17.00 16.00

QUANTITY

9,768.00 5,516.00 2,976.00

9,768.00 5,516.00 2,976.00

9,768.00 5,516.00 2,976.00

ENGINEERING @ 20% 50,402.40 CONTINGENCY @ 15% 37,801.80

TOTAL 340,216.20

QUANTlW 1

9,768 5,516 2,976

5 5 4 1 3 1 2

10 16 6 4

12 4 1 1 2 2

UNlT

LF LF LF LF

LF LF LF LF

LF LF LF LF

UNIT LS LF LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA LS EA EA EA EA LS EA EA EA

UNIT COST

20,000.00 1 5.00 9.00 7.00

885.00 510.00 490.00 100.00 150.00 125.00 80.00

100.00 70.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 35.00

1,500.00 82.00 300.00 82.00

AMOUNT 20,000.00

1 46,520.00 49,644.00 20,832.00 4,425.00 2,550.00 1,960.0

100.00 450.00 125.00 160.00

1,000.00 1,120.00

240.00 200.00 600.00 140.00

1,500.00 82.00

200.00 164.00

A

252,011 2.00

PlPE MATERIAL COMPARISON 10" MAIN WITH 4" STUB LINES

INSTALLED COST

SCENARIO: 10" MAIN WITH 4" STUB LINES

PlPE MATERIAL

HDPE 10" 8" 6" 4"

PVC 1 0" 8" 6" 4"

D I 10" 8" 6" 4"

'ITEM NO.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

QUANTITY

9,768.00 8,492.00

9,768.00 8,492.00

9,768.00 8,492.00

UNIT

LF LF LF LF

LF LF LF LF

LF LF LF LF

AMOUNT

361,812.00

408,100.00

528,704.00

UNIT COST

24.00 15.00 9.00 7.00

27.00 17.00 11 .00 9.00

35.00 22.00 17.00 16.00

AMOUNT. 20,000.00

234,432.00 59,444.00 5,775.00 4,410.00

90.00 1,500.00 1,400.00

450.00 315.00

1,500.00 150.00 300.00

45,500.00

AMOUNT

234,432.00 127,380.00

263,736.00 144,364.00

341,880.00 186,824.00

SUBTOTAL 375,266.00 ENGINEERING @ 20% 75,053.20 CONTINGENCY @ 15% 56,289.90

TOTAL 506,609.10

DESCRIPTION MOBILIZATION 10"HDPEPlPE 4"HDPEPlPE 10" GATE VALVE 4" GATEVALVE 4"'x4"x4" HDPE TEE 10" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 4" HDPE FLANGED ADAPTOR 4" HDPE BRANCH SADDLES 4" BLIND FLANGE TIE TO EXISTING 8" LINE 10" HDPE 90 ELBOW 1O"HDPECAP FIRE HYDRANT COMPLETE

--*

UNIT LS LF LF EA EA EA EA LS EA EA LS EA EA EA

QUANTITY 1

9,768 8,492

5 9 I

10 28 9 9 1 1 2

13

UNIT COST

20,000.00 24.00 7.00

1,155.00 490.00 90.00

150.00 50.00 50.00 35.00

1,500.00 150.00 150.00

3,500.00 L

<=4.0 <= 8.0 - <= 10.0

1 c-

AUTOMATIC SAFETY -TRANSITION VALVE

ING FIRE HYDRANT

GALLON TANK

ZONE DELINEATION

ZONE 1

ZONE 6 I

ZONE 7 1

IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION MODEL SCALE: 1" = 800'

SECTION 1

MODELING RESULTS Both the Town Potable Water System and the Spring Irrigation System operating pressures are shown for each zone.

Scenario: OPERATING ON SPRlNG SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 6.00 hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: R i Verde Engineering c:~rojectS\2832~WnaIdi9t~ringsys.w& Wo Verde Engineering WterCAD v4.5 [4,5015a] 09/2!301 031 7:44 PM O Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755.1 tj6f3 Page 1 of 1

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-1 1 5-1 2 5-1 3 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 5-20 J-21 5-22 5-23 J-24 5-25 J-26 J-27 3-20 J-29 J-30 J31

Pattern

Fixed Fied F i ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Compoeite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 F i ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6

CompOSik ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fixed

Elemtion (8)

5,654.0 5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611 -0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,652.0

Demand :CalwlateCy (earn)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Type

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand D m n d Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand

Demand (gahin)

0.0 0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 21 0.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Caiculated iydraulic Grad4

(a) 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0 5,883.0

Pressure ! (psi)

99.077 102.539 112.057 1 12.490 113.788 114.220 1 15.951 1 15.951 110.1 14 1 18.547 1 18.547 1 18.979 105.1 36 111.192 11 1.624 11 1.624 1 12.490 1 13.355 111.192 1 13.355 1 1 1.1 92 1 13.788 1 14.653 1 14.653 1 15.086 120.710 1 16.384 1 17.682 1 17.249 1 16.81 6 99.943

Scenario: OPERATING ON TCWN SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 6.00 hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rb Verde Engineering o:~ro)e~~2832\dwgWnaMis2-townsys.wd Wo Varck Englrm#ing WaterCAD v4.5 14.501 5a] 09125101 03:31:28 PM Q HaesEad Methods, Inc. 37 Bmokdde Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1

Type

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Oemand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Den~rnd Demand Demand Demand

Demand (sahin)

0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 58.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 2W.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Label

5-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 - 1 J-12 5-13 5-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 5-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J31

Elevation (a)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,600.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621 -0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611 .O 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,651.0

Pattern

Fixed Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fixed ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6

Compodte ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fixed

(gahin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(R)

5,855.0 5,856.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,856.0 5,856.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,856.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,856.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0 5,855.0

90.424 99.943

100.375 101.673 102.106 103.837 103.837 106.000 106.433 106.433 106.865 93.020 99.077 99.510 99.510

100.375 101.241 99.077

101 -241 99.077

101.673 102.539 102.539 102.971 108.596 104.269 105.567 105.135 104.702 88.261

Scenario: OPERATING ON TOWN SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 5.00 hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

T i : FINALDIST Project Engineer: Rim Verde Engineering c:\grojeds\2832\dwg\finaIdist-townsys.wcd Rio Verde Engineering WterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09/25/01 03:31:03 PM O Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Mterbury, CT 06708 USA +I -203-755-1 666 Page 1 of 1

Label

J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 J-24 5-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 5-29 J-30 J-31

Type

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand

Elevation (fi)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5.61 1.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,651.0

Demand (gamin)

0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Pattern

Fixed Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fixed ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fixed ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6 Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fixed

Demand :Calatlated#iydraulii

Calculated Gradt!

Pressure (psi)

87.285 94.662 95.094 96.392 96.825 98.556 98.556

100.71 9 101.1 52 1 01.1 52 1 01 -584 86.765 90.1 27 89.905 88.869 88.851 89.71 7 80.91 6 95.960 93.796 96.392 97.258 97.258 97.690

103.31 5 98.988

100.286 99.854 99.421 87.084

(gahin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

172.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

83.667 0.000

341 333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(8)

5,847.7 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,840.5 5,834.3 5,832.8 5,830.4 5,828.4 5,828.4 5,813.0 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,852.3

Scenario: OPERATING ON TOWN SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 5.00 hr 1 120.00 '

Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rim Verde Engineering c:\9ro/ects~\dwgVinaIdIst-townsys.~ Wo Verde Englneerlng WeterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09/25101 03:31 a3 PM Q Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 b l c s k l e Road Mtsrbury, CT 0670s USA +1-203-756-1666 Page 1 of 1

1 label

J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 5-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 5-23 J-24 J-25 J-a J-27 J-28 5-29 J-30 5-31

Type


Elevation (fi)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,651.0

Demand (aahin)

0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 120.4 40.0 0.0

Pressure (psi)

87.285 94.662 95.094 96.392 96.825 98.556 98.556

100.71 9 101 .152 101 .I52 101.584 86.765 90.1 27 89.905 88.869 88.851 89.71 7 80.91 6 95.960 93.796 96.392 97.258 97.258 97.690

103.31 5 98.988

100.286 99.854 99.421 87.084

Pattern

Fixed Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6 Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fied

(gaurnin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

172.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 83.W 0.000

341 333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Calculated draulic Grad

(a) 5,847.7 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,840.5 5,834.3 5,832.8 5,830.4 5,828.4 5,828.4 5,813.0 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,842.8 5,052.3

Scenario: OPERATING ON SPRING SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 21.00 hr 1 l20.w

Junction Report

T i : FlNALDlST Project Engineec Rio Verde Engineering c:~fojects\2832\dwgWnaklist~ringsys.w~ Wo Verd. Englneerlng WterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09/25/01 03:20:11 PM Q Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Wterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 5-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 5-1 3 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 3-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 3-28 J-29 J-30 531

Elention (fi)

5,654.0 5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5.61 9.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,606.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,652.0

Type

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand

Demand (gallmin)

0.0 0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 3m.9 195.9 56.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

b r (psi)

62.678 61.832 64.749 64.994 66.225 66.581 68.312 68.312 70.475 70.908 70.908 71.341 64.428 61 -286 52.309 43.01 4 38.770 34.236 61 286 64.713 63.505 66.149 67.014 67.014 67.447 73.071 68.745 70.043 89.610 89.177 62.459

Pattern Demand Calcutated ydraulic Gradt

Fied Fied Fixed ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2

corn& ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2


0.000 0.000 0.000

65.000 122.167 1 OQ.833

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

79.000 57.833

101 .I67 1 14.667

0.000 72.500 58.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(fi)

5,798.9 5,788.9 5,773.7 5,773.2 5,773.1 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,788.9 5,767.7 5,745.9 5,724.4 5,712.6 5,700.1 5,767.7 5,770.6 5,773.0 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,772.9 5,796.4

Scenario: OPERAIN0 ON TOWN SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 21 .OO hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

T#e: FlNALOlST Project Engineer: R b Verde Engineering c:~rojects\2832WwgWnaklist-townsys.wd FUo Vwde Engherlng WterCAD v4.5 (4.501 !%I 09/25/01 0331 :W PM 6 HaesEad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-7551 eee Page 1 of 1

Label

J-2 5-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 5-21 5-22 5-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 5-29 J-30 J31

Type

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand b a n d Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand

Elevation (fi)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,w.O 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,651.0

Demand (gamin)

0.0 0.0

65.0 1222 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Pattern

Fixed F i e d ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2


Compodte ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6

Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 F i e d

Demand :Calculated/

(gamin)

0.000 0.000

65.000 122.1 67 109.833

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

79.000 57.833

101.167 1 14.667

0.000 72.500 58.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Calculated iydraulic Grad4

(a) 5,843.1 5,827.8 5,827.4 5,827.2 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,843.1 5,821.8 5,800.1 5,778.6 5,788.8 5,754.3 5,821.8 5,824.7 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,027.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,827.1 5,m.S

Pressure I (psi)

85.267 88.183 88.428 89.659 90.016 91.746 91 -746 93.91 0 94.342 94.342 94.775 87.863 84.721 75.744 66.448 62.205 57.671 84.721 88.1 48 87.020 89.583 90.448 90.448 90.881 96.506 92.179 93.477 93.044 92.612 86.327

,

Scenario: OPERATING ON SPRING SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 27.00 hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering c : L , r 0 ~ ~ \ 2 8 3 ~ W n a I d i s t ~ ~ r i n g s y s . w RkVwde Engkmrlng MterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09L?!Hl1 03:20:49 PM O Huestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brooiceide Road Wte-ry, CT 08708 USA +I -203-756-1866 Page 1 of 1

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 Jb J-7 5-8 J-9 J-1 0 J-11 J-12 J-13 5-1 4 J-15 J-16 J-17 5-1 8 5-1 9 5-20 J-21 5-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 5-28 J-29 J-30 J-31

Elevation (fi)

5,654.0 5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 6,609.0 5,809.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,652.0

Type


Demand (W-1

0.0 0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 11 4.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Pattern

Fb<ed Fixed Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 F i ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6 Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fixed

Demand :Calculated

(gallrn)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

1 31.700 195.900 59.400

163.300 0.000

1 07.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Calculated iydrauk Gra

(fi)

5,821.7 5,814.5 5,803.3 5,802.4 5,801.7 5,796.8 5,793.9 5,792.3 5,791.3 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,790.3 5,814.5 5,803.3 5,803.3 5,803.3 5,803.3 5,803.3 5,803.3 5,002.4 5,801.7 5,793.9 5,793.9 5,792.3 5,792.3 5,792.3 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,790.6 5.81 9.9

72.558 72.882 77.581 77.808 78.600 76.936 77.388 76.700 78.422 78.586 78.561 78.875 75.478 76.726 77.158 77.158 78.024 78.889 76.726 78.473 76.004 75.225 76.090 75.402 75.034 81.459 76.397 77.695 77.263 76.830 72.634


Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering o:~~c48\2832WwgVinaMist-townsys.wd RioVerde Enginming WaterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09/25/01 03:32:14 PM Q hestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +I -203-755-1 666 Page 1 of I

Label

J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 5-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 - 1 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 5-23 J-24 J-25 5-26 5-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J31

Type


Elevation (ft)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,651.0

Demand (gallmi)

0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 58.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 21 0.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Pattern

Fixed Fbed ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Compodte ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2


Demand ;Calculatedl @akin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

131.700 195.900 58.400

163.300 0.000

107.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Calculated iydraulic Gradt

(fi)

5,846.3 5,835.2 5,834.2 5,833.5 5,828.7 5,825.7 5,824.1 5,823.1 5,822.5 5,822.4 5,822.2 5,846.3 5,835.2 5,835.2 5,835.2 5,836.2 5,835.2 5,836.2 5,834.2 5,833.5 5,825.7 5,825.7 5,824.1 5,824.1 5,824.1 5,822.4 5,822.4 5,822.4 5,822.4 5,851.7

Pressure r (psi)

86.667 91 -376 91.393 92.386 90.722 91 . I 73 90.485 92.208 92.372 92.346 92.660 89.263 90.511 90.944 90.944 91.809 92.674 90.511 92.258 89.790 89.01 0 89.875 89.1 87 89.620 95.244 90.183 91 -481 91 -048 90.615 86.852


Junction Report

T i : FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering c:@rojects\2832\dwg\finaIdist-springsys.wcd Rio Verde Engineering WterCAD v4.5 14.501 5a] 09/25/01 03:21:32 PM Q Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Wterbury, CT 06708 USA + I -203-755-1 666 Page 1 of 1

La be1

EXISTING FIRE HYDR J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-1 0 J-11 5-1 2 J-13 J-14 5-1 5 J-16 5-1 7 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 5-28 J-29 J-30 J-31

Elevation (fi)

5,654.0 5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,652.0

Type


Demand (gaumin)

0.0 0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Pattern

F i F ied Fixed ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6 Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fixed

f

Pressure r (psi)

88.972 91 -238 98.923 99.198

100.379 100.013 101 -256 100.860 102.421 102.324 102.043 102.476 93.834 98.058 98.491 98.491 99.356

100.221 98.058

100.063 97.784 99.093 99.958 99.562 99.994

105.61 9 66.391 63.720 63.287 66.553 89.537

Demand ;Calculated\

(gahin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

204.700 146.000

0.000 40.000 0.000

Calculated iydraulic Gradr

(a) 5,859.6 5,856.9 5,852.6 5,852.3 5,852.0 5,850.2 5,849.0 5,848.1 5,846.7 5,845.5 5,844.9 5,844.9 5,856.9 5,852.6 5,852.6 5,852.6 5,852.6 5,852.6 5,852.6 5,852.3 5,852.0 5,849.0 5,849.0 5,848.1 5,848.1 5,848.1 5,767.5 5,758.3 5,758.3 5,766.8 5,858.9

Scenario: OPERATlffi ON TOWN SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 47.00 hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

Title: FlNALDiST Project Engineer: R k Verde Engineering c : ~ m ~ ~ \ 2 8 3 ~ \ f i n a I d i s t - t o w n s y s . w d No Verde Engineering WaterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09/25/01 03:32:41 PM O Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +I -203-7-1666 Page I of 1

Demand (gahm)

0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Type

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand ~ e k n d Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Oemand Demand Oemand Demand

. Label

J-2 5-3 J-4 J-5 J-is J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 3-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 3-16 5-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 5-22 5-23 5-24 J-25 5-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J-31

Elevation (a)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615B 5,610.0 5,60B.O 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611 .O 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,661.0

bre%sure r (psi)

88.993 96.678 96.952 98.134 97.768 99.011 98.61 4

100.176 100.079 99.797

100.230 91.589 95.813 96.246 96.246 97.1 11 97.976 95.813 97.81 8 95.538 96.847 97.71 3 97.31 6 97.749

103.374 64.145 61 -473 61 .a1 64.307 87.724

Pattern calculated

Fked Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fked ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Compodte ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6 Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fied

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

204.700 146.000

0.000 40.000 0.000

ydraulii Gradt (it)

5,861.7 5,847.5 5,847.1 5,846.8 5,845.0 5,843.8 5,842.9 5,841.5 5,840.3 5,039.7 5,839.7 5,851 -7 5,847.5 5,847.5 5,847.5 5,847.5 5,847.5 5,847.5 5,847.1 5,846.8 5,843.8 5,843.8 5,842.9 5,842.9 5,842.9 5,762.3 5,753.1 5,753.1 5,761.6 5,853.8


Junction Report

Title: FlNALOlST Project Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering c:~rojecCs\283~Wnaklist-springsys.~ Wo Vwde Engineering WterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09RS101 03:22:07 PM O Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Wlatehury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR J-2 J3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 5-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 5-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 5-27 5-28 J-29 J-30 J31

Elevation (fi)

5,654.0 5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,600.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,662.0

Type


Demand (gahin)

0.0 0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 21 0.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Pattern

Fixed Fied Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2


Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6

Compoeite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fied

Demand CaMated ~~ressure ! (psi)

85.756 87.641 94.743 94.967 96.111 95.491 96.579 96.058 98.1 42 98.506 98.470 98.902 90.237 93.878 94.310 94.310 95.176 96.041 93.878 95.832 93.51 6 94.41 6 95.281 87.1 90 74.097 65.391 91.980 90.104 86.485 92.413 86.224

:Calculated)lydraulic (gahin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

324.1 80 0.000 0.000

129.400 0.000 0.000

Gradi (fi)

5,852.2 5,848.6 5,843.0 5,842.5 5,8421 5,839.7 5,838.2 5,837.0 5,836.8 5,836.7 5,836.6 5,836.6 5,848.6 5,843.0 5,843.0 5,843.0 5,843.0 5,843.0 5,843.0 5,842.5 5,842.1 5,838.2 5,838.2 5,819.5 5,788.3 5,755.1 5,826.6 5,819.3 5,811.9 5,826.6 5,851 -3


Junction Report

Title: FlNALOlST Projed Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering o:~~ots\2832~MnaIdist-townsys8WOd ~ V ~ E n O i r m r k r g WterCAD v4.5 j4.501 Sa] 09/25IO1 03:33:05 PM O Haestad Methods, lm. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +I -203-755-1 666 Page 1 of 1

J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 - 1 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 5-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 5-30 J31

5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621 -0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,661.0

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Dwnand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand

122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 F i ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2

CompoQite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6 Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fied

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

324.1 80 0.000 0.000

129.400 0.000 0.000

5,844.2 5,841.8 5,840.3 5,839.1 5,838.9 5,838.7 5,838.7 5,838.7 5,850.6 5,845.1 5,845.1 5,845.1 5,845.1 5,845.1 5,845.1 5,844.6 5,844.2 5,840.3 5,840.3 5,821.6 5,790.3 5,757.2 5,020.7 5,821.3 5,814.0 5,828.7 5,853.4

97.007 96.387 97.475 96.952 98.037 99.402 99.365 99.798 91 .I33 94.774 95.206 95.206 96.072 96.937 94.774 96.728 94.411 95.311 96.177 88.086 74.993 66.287 92.876 91.000 87.381 93.308 87.553


Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering c:~~oEe\2832\dwgWnaIdist~ringsys.d Wo Verde Enginadng WaterCAD v4.5 14.501 5a] 09/2M)1 03:22:38 PM Q Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Bmokside Road Waterbury, CT 08708 USA +1-203-75&1666 Page 1 of 1

.

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR 5-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J4 J-7 J-8 J-9 $10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 5-1 6 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 5-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 J30 J-31

d

Demand (sawi )

0.0 0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 S.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341 -3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Elevation (fi)

5,654.0 5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5.61 0.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,652.0

Pattern

Fixed Fied F i ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Compoldte ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6

Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 Fied

Type


Demand :CalculatM

(gahin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

78.800 148.200 158.700

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Calculated iydrauHc Grad

(a) 5,860.2 5,857.5 5,853.4 5,853.0 5,852.7 5,850.9 5,849.8 5,848.9 5,848.9 5,848.9 5,848.9 5,848.9 5,857.5 5,853.4 5,853.4 5,863.4 5,853.4 5,853.4 5,853.4 5,853.0 5,852.7 5,849.8 5,849.8 5,824.8 5,796.6 5,787.7 5,848.9 5,848.9 5,848.9 5,848.9 5,m.S

Pressure 1 (psi)

89.211 91.505 99.233 99.51 1

100.696 100.348 1Ol.603 101.21 6 103.379 103.81 2 103.812 104.244 94.1 00 98.368 98.801 98.801 99.666

100.531 98.388

100.377 98.100 99.440

100.305 89.477 77.689 79.496

101.648 102.946 102.514 102.081 89.782

Scenario: OPERATING ON T m SYS, 7 ZONES Extended Period Analysis: 94.00 hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rim Verde Engineering c:~~ctS\2832\dwgWnaIdM-townsys.wod RJoVwde Engineerhg WaterCAD v4.5 (4.501 5a) 09/251131 03:33:35 PM O Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Broolcoide Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-756-1666 Page I of 1

Type


Label

J-2 J-3 5-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 - 1 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 3-22 5-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 5-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J31

Demand (gamin)

0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 11 4.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Elevation (fi)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621 -0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,651.0

Demand :Calculatedl

(gamin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

78.800 148.200 158.700

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Pattern

Fied Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Compoeite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fbed ZONE 2 ZONE 2


Calculated iydraulic Grad4

(8)

5,851.8 5,847.6 5,847.3 5,847.0 5,845.2 5,844.1 5,843.2 5,843.2 5,843.2 5,843.2 5,843.2 5,851.8 5,847.6 5,847.6 5,847.6 5,847.6 5,847.6 5,847.6 5,847.3 5,847.0 5,844.1 5,844.1 5,819.1 5,790.8 5,782.0 5,843.2 5,843.2 5,843.2 5,843.2 5,053.8

Pressure ! (psi)

89.027 96.755 97.033 98.218 97.870 99.125 98.738

100.901 101.333 101.333 101.766 91.622 95.890 96.323 96.323 97.188 98.053 95.890 97.899 95.622 96.962 07.827 86.999 75.21 1 77.01 8 99.170

100.468 100.036 99.603 87.737


Junction Report

T i : FlNALDiST Project Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering c:\grojects\2832\dwgVinaIdist-springsys.wcd Rio Verde Engineering WterCAD v4.5 [4.5015a] 09/25/01 03:28:13 PM O Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Wterbury, CT 06708 USA +I -203-755-1 666 Page 1 of 1

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 5-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J-31

Elevation (fi)

5,654.0 5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5.61 3.0 5,652.0

Type


Demand (gaVmin)

0.0 0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Pattern

Fied Fied Fixed ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE2 Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE 3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2


Demand :Calculatedl

(gahin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

245.200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000 0.000

257.000 21 0,600

0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000

Calculated iydraulic Gradc:

(R)

5,811.9 5,803.5 5,790.6 5,789.5 5,788.6 5,783.0 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,803.5 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,790.6 5,789.5 5,788.6 5,719.0 5,710.1 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,779.6 5,T/9.6 5,809.8

Pressure (psi)

68.307 68.1 28 72.065 72.01 6 72.959 70.959 71.205 71.205 73.368 73.801 73.801 74.234 70.724 71.200 71.633 71.633 72.4Q8 73.363 71.200 72.881 70.363 42.831 39.828 69.907 70.340 75.964 71 638 72.936 72.503 72.070 68.256

Scenario: OPERATING ON TOWN SYS, 7 ZONES Extendecl Period Analysis: 1 14.00 hr 1 120.00

Junction Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: R i Verde Engineering c:\9rojects\2832WgWnaIdist-townsys.wcd Wo Verde Engineering WaterCAD v4.5 14.501 5a) 09125101 03:34:26 PM Q Haested Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Wterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-756-1666 Page 1 of 1

Demand (gaVmin)

0.0 0.0

65.0 122.2 109.8 376.9 195.9 59.4

163.3 0.0

107.5 172.0

0.0 79.0 57.8

184.8 1 14.7 341.3 72.5 58.3

257.0 210.6 78.8

148.2 482.9 204.7 146.0 129.4 40.0 0.0

Type


. Label

J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 5-30 J-31

Elevation (ft)

5,646.0 5,624.0 5,623.0 5,620.0 5,619.0 5,615.0 5,615.0 5,610.0 5,609.0 5,609.0 5,608.0 5,640.0 5,626.0 5,625.0 5,625.0 5,623.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,621.0 5,626.0 5,620.0 5,618.0 5,618.0 5,617.0 5,604.0 5,614.0 5,611.0 5,612.0 5,613.0 5,651.0

Pattern

Fixed Fixed ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 2

Composite ZONE 3 ZONE 3 ZONE3 Fied ZONE 3 ZONE 1 Fied ZONE 2 ZONE 2 Composite ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 ZONE 7 ZONE 7 ZONE 6 ZONE 6 Composite ZONE 4 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 F i

Demand :Calculatecll (gahin)

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

376.W 195.900 59.400

163.300 0.000

107.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

257.000 21 0.600

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Calwhted iydraulic Gradi

(fi)

5,821.2 5,777.9 5,774.1 5,771.4 5,752.5 5,741 .O 5,739.4 5,738.4 5,737.8 5,737.7 5,737.5 5,821.2 5,777.9 5,777.9 5,777.9 5,777.9 5,777.9 5,777.9 5,774.1 5,771.4 5,680.4 5,671.5 5,739.4 5,739.4 5,739.4 5,737.7 5,737.7 5,737.7 5,737.7 5,842.3

Pressure ! (psi)

75.793 66.582 65.395 65.504 57.771 54.520 53.832 55.555 55.719 55.693 56.007 78.389 65.716 66.149 66.149 67.014 67.880 65.71 6 66.260 62.908 26.145 23.1 43 52.534 52.967 58.591 53.530 54.828 54.395 53.962 82.773

SECTION 2

MODELING RESULTS Curves show operation of tank, intlow to tank, Town's Potable Water System and the Spring System assuming both systems are operating together depending on the tank level. Inflow to the tank is 250 gpm.

Pressure Pipe: P-34 - OPERAING ON BOTH SYS, 7 ZONES

0.0 20.8 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120. Time (hr)

Title: FINALDIST Project Engineer: R i Verde Engineering c : ~ j e c t s \ 2 8 3 2 W w g h H W . ~ d W"-Ew'-fwl WterCAD v4.5 [4.501Sa] 10/2&Dl 10AIO:lQ AM o Haestad Methods, lm. 37 Brookskle Road Vlkterbury. CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1

Tank: 50.000 GAL TANK

I WERATING ON BOTH SYS, 7 ZONES

0.01 1 I I I I

I

I I 1

I I I I

t I I I

J

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 200.0 120 Time (hr)

Title: FlNALDlST Project E n g b r . Rk Verde Engineering o : ~ j e t A 8 ~ ~ W n a k l i s t i s t W G C l RkVerdeEngirmrkrg WterCAD v4.5 [4.MJ15a] 1 0/26101 W:56:19 AM Q Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brooksk Road Wterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1

- OPERATING ON BOTH SYS, 7 ZONES

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rk Verde Engineering ~ : ~ ~ \ 2 8 3 ~ W n a k l i i . w c d FFkVerdeEn(lk#ukrg WtsrCAD v4.5 [4.5015al 10/26K)l 09:55:18 AM O Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Wterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-756-1666 Page 1 of 1

Pressure Pipe: EXISTING 1 0 PVC

OPERATING ON BOTH SYS, 7 ZONES

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rim Verde Engineering c : ~ j e c t s W 3 2 ~ ~ k l i s t . ~ Wo V.rde Engineering WaterCAI3 v4.5 (4.501 5 4 1 OL?W1 09:57:14 AM Q Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1606 Page 1 of 1

SECTION 3

MODELING RESULTS Reports show Fire Flow Capabilities for the proposed distribution system for both the Town Potable Water System and the Spring System.

Scenario: FlRE FLOW FROM SPRING SYS Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report

Tltle: FlNALDlST Project Engineec Rio Verde Engineering c:~jects32GdZklwgVinalff&ng8ysbwCd Wo Wde En~irnerkyl WaterCAO v4.5 [4.501 5 4 09l27Kl1 0955:2!5 AM Q HaesEad Methods, Inc. 37 bokside Road Wtedwry, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR H-1 H-2 H-3 H-4 H-5 H-6 H.7 HB H-9 H-10

Total Fkw

Needed @pm)

1,000.00 1,000.00 ,000.00

1,000.00 1,000.00

1,000.00 1,000.00

1,000.00

Total Fkw

Available @pm)

1,186.62 1,143.60 1,106.78 1,042.56 1,100.16

1,071.17 1,052.02

,000.001,030.74 976.14

ed Available Fire

Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone-1 Lone1 Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone-1 tone-1 Zone-1 Lone-1 Zone1

Zone Pressure

@gi)

20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

Preswre (pd)

20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

19 19 17 17 19 15 18 19 18 19 18

~esidua1J3.kuIated~inimum Reddual Preswre

W)

20.00 2,454.10

21.30 20.00 22.60 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

true true true true true true true

bue true bue

true true true true true true true true true tn~e krlse

1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00

1,000.00 1,000.00

1,000.00 1,000.00

Flow @Pm)

1,186.62 1,143.60 1,106.78 1,042.56 1,100.16

t,000~001,084.0I,000.001,~.09 1,071.17 1,052.02

l,000.001,044.861,000.001,044.86 1,030.74

976.14

Scenario: FlRE F L W FROM TOWN SYS Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report

Title: FlNALDlST Project Engineer: Rio Verde Engineering

c:\pro~&\2832~VinaM'gprirt~sys.w Wo Veda Enginecrrhrg WaterCAD v4.5 [4.5015aJ OSn7101 10:11:24 AM Q Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Broolceide Road Wterbury, CT 06708 USA 41 -203-755-1 666 Page 1 of 2

Satiefies Fire Fkw

3mdraints;'

true true true true true true true true true true true nil

Label

EXISTING FIRE HYDR H-1 H-2 H-3 H-4 H-5 H-6 H-7 H-8 H-9 H-10 J-11

Needed tire Fkw

(gpm)

1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00

1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00

.,000.00

Available Fire Flow (gpm)

2,500.00 2,500.00 2,219.65 1,789.72

1,000.002,166.#1,000.002,165.45 1,959.38 1,844.79 1,746.76 1,678.76 1,612.80

1,000.001,409.561,000.001,409.56 N/A

Total Fkw

Needed (gpm)

1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00

,000.00 ,000.00

1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00

WA

Flow

Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone1 Zone-1 Z~ne-1 Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone-1 Zone-1

Total - Ftow Available

(gpm)

2,500.00 2,500.00 2,219.65 1,789.72

1,959.38 1,844.79 1,746.76 1,678.76 1,612.80

WA

1 1

18 18 17 18 18 19 18 17 19

N/A

Pressure (psi)

20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

3

true true true true true b~ true true true true true take

~esidualblculatedlknimum Residual Preswre

( P a

53.98 2,458.87

21.30 20.00 22.60 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

N/A

Zone Pressure

(psi)

20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TIE INTO EXISTING SPRING S Y S T E ~

EXISTING WELL HOUSE

1 1 'x 1 5' CONCRETE VAULT FOR CONTROL VALVES AND TIE

INTO TOWN POTABLE WATER SYSTEM

10" GATE VALVE, GEAR BOX a" GATE VALVE, GEAR BOX ELECTRONIC CONTROLS 8" BACKFLOW FITTING - 2 EACH

--

PROFILE VIEW HZ SCALE: 1" = 100' VT SCALE: 1" = 10'


DRAWN Bf i CfF I DATE: 9/27/01 1


I I I PAGE: 3 OF 20

I I RAWN BY: CFF I I PROFILE VIEW

HZ SCALE: 1" = 100' VT SCALE: 1" = 10'

PROFILE VIEW HZ SCALE: 1" = 100' I

VT SCALE: 1" = 10'

I I 1 JOB NO. 2832 11 I ' I PAGE: 6 OF 20 1

PROFILE VIEW HZ SCALE: 1" = 100' VT SCALE: 1 * = 10'

BY: R V f

DATE: 9/27/0 1

J08 NO. 2832

I' PAGE: 7 O f 20

I I PROFILE VIEW BY: RVF I HZ SCALE: 1" = VT SCALE: 1 " = 10

PATE: 9/27/01 1 I

PAGE: 8 OF 20


- - u k z- z g a - m-'

- --

DFSlGNED BY: RVF

JOB NO. 2832 PAGE: 9 O f 20

3-13 VALVE BOX WITH SYSTEM HOOK UP DRAIN VALVE

SPRINKLER AND


C I I A /--- EXISTING GROUND LINE

ALVE BOX WITH SPRINKLER YSTEM AIN VALVE HOOK UP AND


WITH 10nx8"

J-21 6" FIRE HYDRANT

PROFILE VIEW HZ SCALE: 1" = 100' VT SCALE: 1 * = 10'

TIE INTO EXISTING 4" SPRINKLER SYSTEM

4" GATE VALVE

-"-----. -__L

-----.PIC\

I



lGNEO BY: R V f

RAWN BY: CFE

CHEC)(fP BY: RVE

,JOB NO. 2832 PAGE: 14 OF 20

EXISTING MOUND LINE VALVE BOX WITH

/'- / DRAIN VALVE


7 EXISTING GROUND UNE 7


J-23 VALVE BOX WITH DRAIN VALVE

1- AIR VAC VALVE

PROFILE VIEW HZ SCALE: 1" = 100' VT SCALE: 1 " = 10'

_CHECKED BY: RVF

DATE: 9/27/01

406 PAGE: No. 17 2832 O f 20

PROFILE VIEW HZ SCALE: 1" = 100' VT SCALE: 1 " = 10'

DESlGNFD BY: RVF I RAWN BY: CFF I I


. -- /--- EXISTING GROUND LINE

J-30 VALVE DRAIN

BOX WITH VALVE

R50 SPRINKLER HEADS 76.6 GPM

CONTROLLER & PEDESTAL

BLOW OUT VALVE AND DRAIN VALVE

SPRINKLER HEAD FLOW/ SPRINKLER HEAD

BLOW OUT VALVE AND DRAIN VALVE

'-" m'-m WNBY: CEE

gcmm er: RVE DATE: 9/28/01

J08 NO. 2832 PAGE 2 # 2

RIO VERDE ENGINEERING

307) 367-2826 k (3@7)-367-2546 P l lwDU, WYOMING

ALPINE SPRING IRRIGATION PROJECT SPRINKLER DESIGN FOR 8 0 ' ~ 1 60' AREA

TOWN OF ALPINE ALPINE, WYOMlNG

W4t'W2/2klU1 BY: 28 3077395350 3REYS RIVER RD PAGE 02

FS - 2700-4 (7/93) OHB No, 0396-0082

- u , s , D L ~ \ ~ ~ T M ~ N T CF AGRXCUZTWRE I--- Forest serv ice

SPECIAL- USE 'RE~U!ZT

Authori t:y : Federal Land - Management A c t o f Oct . 2 1 , 1976 _ _ -

~uth. Type

Region/Fores t/Discx&ct S tate/County

g y ! ! ? / g ? d m 5 6 1 0 2 3 - - - -

Cong. D i s t . Latitude Longitude 2 A - 4 3-0 9-2 5 1 1 1-2 0-A 9

TOWN OF ALPINE (a municipal corporation) o f - (Ho 1-der Name) ( B i l l i n g Address - 1)

-3 C? '7 L? P . 0. XIOX;usC ALPIEE - WY 83128

- W C

( B l l l i n g Address - 2 ) ' (crcy) (S ta te ) (Zip Code)

(hezeicafter called the Moldez) is hereby authorized t o use or occupy National Forest System lands , to use subject t o the conditions set out below, on the BRIDGER-TETON Kational Forest.

This perrri t covers approxima~ely 5 . 5 acres and is described as portions of Sections 33, and 32 T36N, R118W and 6dc t i0n 2 , T36N, R119W 6 t h Principal Meridian, Wyoming as shown on the location map attached t o and made a part of th i s permit, and is issued for the purpose of: ~onot;uction and maintenance ok a w a t e r s y s t e m for the town o f AQine, includes the following;

1. Spring c o l l e c t i o n sysrem and water storage tank in M i l l Hollow Nf31/4, NE1/4, Seetion 2 , T36N, R119W

2 . 1.8 ~ n i l ~ s (9500 f t . ) o f 6 " diameter water transmis~ ion line from spring co1lecrion t o building; Section 2 , T36P1, RI19U; and Section 33, T37N, RllBW ,

3 . Two wells with submersible electric: pumps; NW1/4, NWl/lr, Section 33, T37N, R118W

. An 13' X 24' ~ u i l d i n g - to house chlorination equipment and valves; NW1/4, NWl/h, Section 33 , T37N, T118V

ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

5 . ' 12' X 24' addition t o west s i d e of Building (t.otal dimeasions now 30' X 24' )

6 . Water storage tank (500,000 gal1on:t and 100Of of access road; NE1/6, NB1/4, Section 32, T37N, ~ l i 8 Q

7. Wate.c storage tank (250,000 gallon:) and 550 ' of accesa road; NW1/4, NB1/4, Section 32, T37N, RlL8W

8 , 2100' of 6 " . 8 " , end LO" diameter water tra~smission line and 2100' of telemetry c a b l ~ ~ in the same trench; Sections 32 & 33, T37N, RlS8W

Nap of the area (ExhFbit: A) and Mitigation Measuxe~ 1-19 (Exhibit B) are attached and_ ' made part o f th i s permit.,

he above described or def ined area shall be refrerred to herein as the "permit area". . .

SREYS RIVER RD

T m S AND CQPiDfTXdNS

PAGE 03

. AUTHORITY AND C E W TERMS OF THE PERMIT

A. Aut'hori.Jg. This p * R i t f a issued pursuant t o tho authorities enumerated se Title 36, Cods ~f Federal Regulations, Section 2 5 1 Subpart B, as amended. T h i ~ p e r n i t , end the act iv i t ies o t use authorized, shell bo subject to the terms and condiefans of the secretaryl's regulations and' any subsequent: amer~daent t o them,

8. &&norLzed 0fC ic .e~ . The authorized officer is tho Forest Supantisor or a delegated. subordinate officer.

License. T h i ~ permit is a l icense fox: the use of federally owned Land and does not c * -- grant aay permanent, possessory interest in real property, nor shall this permit c o n r t i t ~ t e a contract for purpbsss of th. Contract ~ i s ~ u t e s Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 611). 'Loss of the privileges granted by th is permit by revocation, termination, or suspension f r not coapenkable t o the %older.

~me.ndment. This permit m a y be amended in vhole or in part by the Forest Service -- when, a t the discretion of the authorfzed off icer , such action 1s deemed necessary or desirable to incorporate n e s terms, conditions., and stipulations as rnay .be xequired by law, r e p l a t i o n , Land management plans, or ocher management decfsions.

E. Existing Rights. Thfr permit is aubjece to a l l valid rights and claims of third pa t t i e s . The United States is not l i a b l e t o the bolder fo r tha exercise of any such r ight o r claim.

F. Noo+axclusive Use. Unless expressly provided in additional c e r a g , this permit is n o t exclusiva. The Forest Service reserves the ril;he t o use or atfow others t o use any part of the .?errnit area for any purpose.

G. Public Access and Use, Unless spccifica1l:r l i m i t e d under additional terns to this. perntit, the holder agrees to allow the public :free and unrestricted access t o and use of the pe.r;mtt area at a l l times fo r a l l lawful putposos . To facilitate public use o f the permit area, all existing roads or roads a3 ma;y be constructed by the horder shall remain Dpen t o the public , except for roads as may be cLosed by joint agrsement of the holder and the authorized of f i cer .

H. = s o t Service Right of Entry and-Jnspectit~. The Forest Senriceshal l have free and untestrfcted access at a l l times, including the right t o enter into a l l buildings, dwellings, and other f a c i l i t i e s t o ensure comp'liance with the tams and conditions of this permi t . In addition, the Forest Service may enter the authorized factlicies fo r any purpose or reason consistent with any right or obligation of the United States vnder any law or regulation.

I . e i g n a b l l i t y . This permit i s not assignable or transferable. If the holder througb death, voluntary . sa le or txandfer , enforcement of contract, foreclosure, o r other v a l i d legal ptcceeding shall cease t o be the owner of the improvements, this permit shaLl terminate.

3 . X n t t Limitations. Nothing in this permit allows or implles permission t o bui ld or maintain any structure or f a c i l i t y , or t o conduct any activtty uulese spsci~ica~ly provided for in this parni t . Any use not speclficaLLy idene i f t sd in t h i s pqrmit must be approved by the authorized officer i n the form o f a new permit or permit amendment.

3REYS RIVER RD PAGE 04

13. TE:bVKE AND ISSIUNCE OF ' NEW PERHIT

A. a r i r a t i o n at the End-of the Authorized This p e ~ f t w i l l expire a t aidnight on ~ec,!!nber 31, 2026. Eacpiratioo shsll occur by opetation of law and shall s o t require '

notice, any derision ddcumanf, o r any* envi~~nmant;aL -#&yeis or other documentation*

8:. Cs;F~gtruction. Any construction a.uthorized by th i s pemit may conmance by --

N/A and shall be complotsd by N/A . If ~ ~ o s c x ~ r c t i o n Is not completed within the prescribed time, this permit may be tovoked ot: suspended . C. MinimunI Use or Occupancy of the Permit Ares. US^ or O C C U ~ M C ~ of tho permit area s h a l n l e exercised at l a a r t _ 3 6 5 days each year, unless o t h o ~ t s a authorized in writing under additional terms of ehia permi c .

D. E . i f i c a t i o n t o Authorizsd Officer. IE the holder desires issuance o f anow permit af tar e:*iratian, the holder s h a l l norify the authorized officet in wrsting nor loss then s i x (6) months prior t o the expiration date of t h i s permit.

E. ~or~d.Lclons for Issuance o f a New Permit. .kt the expiration or termination of an existffi:g permit, a new permit osy be issued t o the holder of the previous permit or t o a new holder subject t o the following conditions:

1. l'he authorized use i s compatible with the land use allocation in the Forest Land and Resource Management Plan.

2 . Ihe permit area is being used f o x the purposes previously authorized, 3 . The permit area is being operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions

of the permit. 4. lhe holder has shown previous good fa i th compliance with the terms and conditions

~f a l l pflor or other existffng~permits , and has noe engaged in any activity ax t ransact ion contrary t o Federal contracts, p a r a i t s , Laws, ~ 1 : regulation.

F. Discretion of Fcxest S e n i c e . Notwithstanding any provisions of any prior or other g5or.Z the authorized officer may prescribe new terms. conditions, and s tipulilti0.n~ when a new permit is issued. The dec is ion whether t o issue a new permit to a holder ow successor in interest is a t the absolute dfscretion of the Forest Service.

XI. RESPONSIBfLXTIES OF THE HOLDER

A. -- Plans . If required by the authorized officer, a l l plans for developaent, layout. construction, reconstruction, or alteration of improvements on the permit area, as well as reviolons of such plans, must be prepared by a licensed engineerg, architect, .and/or landscape architect.. such plans must be opptoved in writing by tha authorized officer ot a designated ~~prcsentative before the commencement o f any wozk. A holder: may be required to furnish as-built plans, maps. or surveys, or other similar information, upon cornple tion of construction.

B . Yaintenance. The holdex shall ma.intain the improvements and permit area t o s e a n G d s of repair, orderliness, nea.tness, sanitation, and safety acceptable ' t.0 the authorized officer, and consistent with appttcable Federal, State, and local health and safety and othet requirtmeflts.

C. &ard Analysis. The hotder has a conclnuing,responslbllity to fdentlfy and abate hazardous condltians an the permit axes which couLd affect the improvements or pose a risk of injury to individuals. Any a.ctions to abate such hazards shall be afrer~consultatlon with the authorized officer.


D. CompLiance with Laws, Rb ' l a t l o n s , and other Legal R e = j T ments. - The holder. in ai.e<cTsing the uses authori . by this pornit ., will assume i ponsibility for complienfe with the regulations &the Department of Agriculture and a l l Federal,.State, county, and municipal h ~ s , ordinances, or rsgulatlona which are applicable t o the area or operations covered b y t h i s permit. The obligittions of the holder under t h i s permit are no t contingent upon any duty of the F0re.t Sewice t o inspscf the premises. A failure by che Forest Service. or other governnontal off ic ia ls , t o inspect is not a defense t o noncompliance with any aP the terns and aondt1:ions o f th i s permit.

E. Fira Proventton and Suppression. The holder shall take all reasonable ~ a c a u t i o n s to pravant and supptaso forest fires. Open fires are prohibited except with writton permir from the authorized officer or the authorized officer's agent.

F. Change of Address. The holder shall innedi~tely n o t i f y the authorized officer of a change in address,

G . Chan~e in Ownership of the Authorized Improvements. This permit i s not assignable and Gtminates upon change of ownership of ehu improvements. The holder shall immediately notify the authorized off icer when a change in ownership is pending. Noelfication by the present holder and potenf;ial owner shall be executed using Foxm FS-2700-3, Spacial Use Application and Report, or Form FS-2700-3a, Request for Termination o f and Appllcacion for Special-Us13 Permit. Upon receipt of the ptoper documentation, the authorized o f f i c e r rnay issue a permit to the new owner o f the improvements.

XV , LIABILITY

For purposes of this section, "holderM includes the holder's heirs, assigns, agents, empl~yee3, and contractors.

A . Risk o f Loss. The holder assumes all r i s k of loss of the property. Loss to the prope;ty may result from, but is not Limited to, theft, vandalism, fire, avalurche~. rising waters, rinds, f a l l i n g limbs or trees, and acts of God. If the authorized improvements are destroyed o r substantially d;nma&ed, the authorized offices shel l conduct an analysis to determine whether the lmprovcmants can be safely occupied in the future and whether rebuilding should be allowad.

B. Damage to Property of tFe United States. The hokder has am affirmative duty to p r o r z t f rom injury and danige the land, property, and other intoxsst 'of the United s t a t e s . llamag= includes, but is not limited t o , fire suppression costs and el1 costs and damages associated w i t h or resulting from the release o r threatened release of a harardods substance occurring during o r as a cesuLt of the holder's activities on, Qr relaced to, the lands property, and other interests covered by the permit.

1. The holder shall compensate in f u l l the United States for damages occurring under the terms of t h i s permit or under any law or regulation applicable t o the National Forests. The holder shall be liable b r a11 injury, l o s s . or damage, including fire suppression, or other cos tn associated with rehabilLtation or restoration of natural resources, associated with the holder's use or occupancy. Compensation shall include. but is not limited t o , the value o f resources damaged or destroyed, the c o s t s of restoratLon, cleanup, or other mitigation, f i r e suppression or other types of abatement cos ts , and a l l administrative, legal ( inc ludf ng attorney fees), and other c o s t s in corlnectf on therewith.

2 . With respect t o roads, th8 holder shall be l i a b l e for damages to a l l roads and trai ls of the Unitad States open t o public use caused by the holder's use t o the same extent as provided under paragraph IV ( B ) ( l ) , except that liability shall not include reasonable and ordfnary wear and tear.

3 . In addition t o ' Liability provided in ehfs paragraph. the holder nay incur s t r i c t l i a b i l i t y for certain high hazard sftuations if so provided by additional clause3 appended t o t h i s permit .

84/82!2801 09: 28 3877395350 3REYS RIVER RD PAGE 06

C . _Indsr~nificatiorr and L l a b V Y t y of the United States. The ' ~ l d e r shall comply with a l l app1:icable fedexal, s t a t and local law8 anad seguht ion ., .'inoluding but not lirriiced to the' Fudornl Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U . s .c: 1251 s, the o i l Pollution ~ c t , 33 O . S , C . 2701 at n, the Clean A i r Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 =, the Resource Conserration and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq, and the Gonrprehenaive ~nvironnental Response, Control, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 re 3, as subsequorltly amended. The holder shall Lndemnif'y, defend, and hold the United States harnldss for any vf olacions incurred under any obch laws and regulations or for any c o s t s , dzmages, claims, liabilities, and judgements arising from past, present. and future acts or omissions o f the holder in connection with the use andfor occupancy authoriz~d by t h i s permit. This Lndemriification and hold harmless agreement includes, but is not l i m i t e d to, acts and omissions o f the holdex in connection with the use and/or oocupancy authorized by thfs permit which result in: (1) violations o f the above or any a~rplicable laws and regulaelons; (2 ) judgements, claims, or demands assessed against tha United States; ( 3 ) c o s t s , expenses, and damages incurred by the United States; or ( 4 ) other releases ox chreaeened releases on or lnto land, property, and other incetest o f the Vnited States by s o l i d waste and/or hazardous substance(r) . The holder's Indemnification of the Vnited Sta tes shall also include any damage Eo l i f e or property arising from the holder's occupancy or use of land, property, and ather interest of the United S t a t e s . The United Sta tes has no duty to inspect pegnit area or to warn o f hazard3 and, if the United States does inspect the permit area, it shall incur no additional duty n o r liabilf ry for iden t i f i ed or non-idantif ied hazards. This aovenant may be enforced by the Vnited States in a cnurt of competent: jurisdict ion.

v. TERMINATION, REVOCAT.gON, AND SDSPBRSION - A . ~ e n e r a l . For purposes of t h i s permit, *ter.rainationt', wrevocatton", and wsuspenrfonn refer t o the cessation of uses and privileges under the pemit.

* wrexaination" refers to thc cessation af the permit under its own t e a s without the necessity for any decision or action by the authorized officer. Termination occur3 automatically when, by the terms of the permit, a fixed or agreed upon condition, event, or time cccurs. For example, the permLt terminates at expiration, Taminations are not appealable.

revocation" refers t o an action by the. authorized officer t o end the permit because of noncolapliance with any of tho prescribed toms, or for reasons in the public interest. Rkvocaticns are appealable ,

n~uppensiontl refers t o a revocation which t s temporary and the privileges nay be restoxed upon the occurrence of prescribed actions or conditions. SuspensXons are appealable.

B. =ation.-or Suspension. The Forest Service may suspend or revoke this pernit in whole or parc for: 1. Noncompliance with FsderaS, S t a t e , or locak law6 and regulstfona. 2 . Nancompliance with the terms and conditions of t h i s permit, 3 . Reasons in the public interest. h , Abandonment or other'failure of the holder to otherwise exercise the privileges granted.

C. OppoctunitY co Take Corrective Action. Prior t o revocation or suspension for cause pursuant to Sectfan V (B), the authorized of f i cer sha l l give the holder w r i t t e n notice bf the grounds for each action and a retisonabla tine. not to exceed 90 days, t o conplate t he corrective action prescribed by the authorized officer.

3REE RIVER RD PAGE 07

0 . Removal of I ~ ~ o v e m e n t s Upon abandonment, revocation, '-mifiation, o r $xpirsition of. this authorization, the .der shall. remove witbin a rea; ablo time prescribed by the authorized officer a l l structures and improvements, except those owned by the United sreces, and shall restore the lire. If the hold,.+ fail. t o renpve all structures or improvements within the prescribed period, they shall becoma the propetty o f the United States and may be sold, destroyed or othenuise disposed of withour any liability t o the United States. Houever, the holder ohall remair~ l iable for a l l cost associated with their reaovd, including costs of sale and impoundment, cleanup, and restoration of the s i t e .

41. FEES

Termination for Nonpayment. This permit s h t l l automatically terminate without the A - - necessity of prior t l O C f ~ e when land use renrel, h a s are 90 calendar days fron the due date in arrears.

8 . The holder shall pay arrnually in acivance a z.um determined by the Forest Service t o be the f a i r market value of the use gronted by chis authorization. The i n i t i a l payment is see at $ Fee Waived under 36 CFR25~ .57 (b ) - for the xrmaaindrr of the calendar year. Subsequen.t payments s h a l l be determined by the use of an annual flae schedule. The Forest Service may adjust the mount o f payment annually by an appxopoiate indpxing factor t o ~ e f b ~ t mote nearly the fair ntrrker vr~lue of the use, Af certain intervals the Forest Service rkall review the fee and adjust the fee as necessary t o assure that it is cormensurate with the f a i x market: value of the authorized xi&ts and privileges, as decernined by appraisal ox other sound bwinc!ss management pxinciples.

C . Payment Due Data. The payment due date shal.1 be the close o f business on January 1 of each calendar year papent is due. Payment8 due the U n i t e d Sta tes fo r phis use shall be deposited at ~ n t t ~ b ~ i e c t i a n Off icer, Intermountain Region, F i l e 61657, P. 0 . Box 6000, Saa Francisco, CA 94160-2657 in the form o f a check, draf t , ox money ozdor payable t.o ''Forest Service, USDA." Payments sha l l ba credfted on the date received by th; designated Forest Service eollactiin officer or d e p o s i t location. If the due date for the f'ee or fee calculation statement falls on a non workday, the charges shall not apply u n t i l the close of business on the next workday.

Late Pazent Interest. Pursuant t o the Federal Claims Collection Act o f 1966, as P * - amended, 31 USC 3101, a t seq.. and regulations at 7 CFR Part 3 , Subpart B, an interest charge r h a l l be assessed on any payman: or f i n a ~ ~ c i s l statement not recelved by the due date. lnteresc shpll be assessed using the most current rats prescribed by the United States Department of Treasury's Fiscal Requirements Manual (TFRH-6-8020.20). Interest s h a l t accrue from the date the payment or f tnancial statement was due, In the event that two or more b i l l i n g s are required for delixrquent: accounts, administrative costs to cover prclcessing and handling of the delinquent debc w i l l be assessed,

Addit:ional Penal t ies . Xn the event of perwit: termination pursuant t o provisiolls E. - V I (A) . ond prior t o 5 issuance of a new permit , a penalty of 6 percent per year shall be assessed on any fee amount overdue in excess of 90 days from the payment due date. This p e n a . 1 ~ ~ shall accrue from the due date of the f i r s t b i l l i n g or the date the fee calculation f inanc ia l statement was dtta. The pcznalty is in addition t o interest and any other cheLsges speci f ied in the above paragraph.

F. Disput-ed Fees . Disputed fees are due and payable by the due date. No a p p e a l of fees will be considered by the Forest Setvice without f u l l p a p e n t of the disputed amount., Adjustmcntu, i f necessary, will be made in accordance w i t h settlement terms or appeal dec is ion .

SREYS RIVER RD PAGE 138

G. .- Delinquent Fees. 1. De"nquent fees and ot:her charges c'-all be subject t o a l l rights and ramedies affsrdet ne United States pursuant t o L r t a l l a w and implementing regulaeions (31 U . S . C . 3721 at seq.) . 2 , The i~uthotized officer shall require payment o f fees awed the Lltrfted States under any Forsat Service authgt iza~L~n before i~ouance of a new permit.

V . OTHER PROVISIONS

A . Members of Congress. No Member of or Delegtrre t o Congress or Resident ~omofssionet shall benef i t f r o m t h i s permit either directly or indirectly, except when the authorized use p r o v t d ~ s a general benefit to a corporation.

B. w a l s and Remedies. Any discretionary decisions or drterninationo by the authorized officer are subject t o the appeal regulations a t 36 CPR 251. Subpart: C, or r e v i s tons thereto.

C. - Removal and Planting of Vegetation. This p e r n i t does not authorize the cutting of ttalber or other vegetation, Ttats or shrubbaxy may be removed or destroyed only after the authorized officer, or authorized officer's aient, has approved, and- has marked or - - ocherwise designotsd that which nay be removed or-destroyed. ~imbba; cut o r destroyed shall be paid for by the holder as follow$: Merchantable timber at appraised value and young-growth timber below merchantable s i z e a t oursent damage appraisal value, provided that the Forest Service reserves the right t o d:Lrpose o f the merchaetable timbex to others than the holder at no stunpoge cost t o tlia holder. Trees, shrubs, and other plants may be planted i n such manner and in such places about the ptarnises as may be approved by the authorized officer.

D. superior Clauses. In.the event of any conf:lict between any of the preceding printed clauses or any provision thereof and any of the following clauses or any provision thereof, the preceding printed clauses shall contcol.

E. ~ e a l th, Safety, and Environmental Protecttoll (B-26) Holder shall toke all measures necessary to protect tha health and safety o f aILl persons aefecttd by its activities performed i n connection ui th the cons tructian, operation, maintenance, or termination of ehe ~ight-of-way, and shall proaptly abate as ctxapletely as possible any physical or mechanical procedure, ac t iv i ty , event, or condition, exirttnp or occurring at any t i m e : (1) t h a t is susceptible t o abatement by the holder, (2) which asises out of, or oould adversely affect the construction, operation, aaintenanco, or termination of a l l Or any part of the ALPINE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT W A T X PIPELINES AND STORAGE TANKS, and (3) that causes ot threatens t o 'cause: ( a ) a hazard to the safety of workers or t o public h e a l t h or safety, or (b) serious and irreparable harm or dtmage to &s envizonrnent ( i n c l u d i n g but n e t limited ee areas of vegetation or timber, f i s h or other w i l d l i f e populations, or t h s i i habitats , or any othexr natural resource). Holder shall immediately notify the authorized officer of a1.L secious accidents which occur in connection with such activities.

F. - Revegetation, Surface Restoration of Ground Cover (D-9) Holder shall be.responsible f o r prevention and conttol of so11 erosion and ,5ullying on lands covoxsd by t h i s permit and adjacent thereto, rekulcing from consrructi6n. operatfon, maintenance, m d termination of the permitted use. HoLder rhall so construct permitted improvements to avoid t h e accumulation o f excessive heads of water and t o avoid encroachment on streaas. Holder rhall revegetate or otherwise .stabilize all ground where the soil has bean exposed and shall construct and maintain n0-censary prsvemive masuree t o supplement the vegetation.

G. - Rcve~etation, Surface Resioration of TopsoiL (D-10) Topsoil shall be stripped ftom the p e r ~ i t t e d area and be deposited in storage .p i les apart from othca: excavated' material. After the desired anount o f material has been removed, and the resulting p i t has been trimmed end smoothed as required, the stored topsoil shall be evenly spread over esposed subs011 t o t)ie extent t h a t nay be practicable, and shall be revegetated.

3REYS RIVER RD PAGE 09 H . wlegetation, Surface Re.'osrtion. Seeding or P l a n c i n ~ (p 11) Seeding or planting w i l l be: done at a time o f tL /ear, in a manner and with spe .s which the District: Ranger considesr offer the bcsi chance of suecuss and will be repeated pnnually until such areas are accepted in writing by the District Ranger as saei6factozily revegetated and stztbilized . I, 9 e r s a d e d Parait. (X-18) This pemit rupersedes a special-use permit designated: Alpine Water and Sewer District, dated 10/21/8.5.

J. ~ r o v e n o n t Relocation. (X- 33) This permit is granted with the expreas understanding that should .future locat ion of U:nLted States Government-owned inprovements or road righis-cf -way require the ralocreion o f the holder's improvenants , such relocation w i l l be done by, and a t the expense o f , tho holder within a reasonable t h e as spec i f i ed by the authorized o f f i c e r .

K. Nonexclusfve Use ( X - 4 9 ) This permit is not exclusive; that i s , the Forest Service reseGts the right to use or permit others to use any part of the permitted area f o r any purpose, pxovlded such use does noc interfere with the rtghts and privi leges hereby authori.zed .

Water Rights (X-74) - This permit confers no right to the use of water by the holder.

M. @!rating Plans. ( R 4 4 2 ) The permittee shall annually furnish the Forest Sentice a writteri plan o f operations which shall set Earth planned periods and locations of p~oporrid activit!ie(l, both priority and temporary use, under the p r o v i a i ~ n a of th i s special use permit. This plan w i l l be rubmiteed by 01/96. Written approval of the Plan of Opexatiens by the Forest Service Authorized Officer is prerequisite t o commeacament of pernlfttce's opexations. Upon reasonable notice to the Forest Service, suab Plan aay be revised when necessitated by weather or othet unpredictable cir~urn~tances and will be subject: to wt i t t en approval of the Forest Service.

The pxavisions of the operating plan and any tevisions thereto w i l l become a part of t h i s permit and will be signed by the District Rangec and the pernittoe or his designated representative,

h', ~ i l i h t s - o f Way Management Plans. (R4-X3) The holder shall operate and maintain the right-of-way, authorized facilities, and access roads In a manner cons is tent with ~ a t i c n ~ ~ ores t System land and resource mansg,.onant ob ject ivos 'and policies. To meet t h i s requirement, the holder shall prepare a right-of-way management plan and submit i t . t o the Forest Service pt for to compleclon of project construction (or, by 02/96). The .

plan w i l l identify specf fic aanaganetlt and protection objectives and practices by locat ion , and identify responsibiLitias and schedules. The right-of -way management plan will become a p a z t of this authorizarion when spptoved by the Forest Service, and shall be j ofrr tly reviewed and revised periodically, according to its terns,

Public reporting burden for collecticm o f infqmation, i f requested, i s estimated t o average 1 'hour per response for annual financi.aL infornation; average 1 hour per response Co pzepare or update operation and/or maintenance plan; average 1 hour per response for inspection reports; and an avorage of 1 hour for eachrequest that may include such things as reports, logs, facility and user information, sublease infornation ; and other similar misce Jlaneous i.nf oxmation requests. This includes the tine for reviewing instructions. searching exis t ing data sources, gatheting and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the col lect ion of information. Send comments regarding th i s burden estimate or any other aspect of this co1 lec~:~on of informatton, including suggestictns fox reducing this burden, to Department of Agriculture, Clearance Officer, OIRM, AG Box 7 6 3 0 , Washington D.C. 20250: and to the Off ice of Hanr8a-nt and Budget, Papcsmoork Rectucti~n Project (OMB # 0596-0082), Washington, D.C. 20503.

04/02/2001 09: 29 3077395350 3RE'r'S RIVER RD

Thfs permit fs accepted subject t o the condit-ions set out above.

Datt : - I / ~ z / ~ L

PAGE 10

84/Q2/2801 UY: 28 2877395350 3REYS RIVER RD PAGE 12

;MXTIGATSN(t MEASURES AUXN6 UATEB AN) SEWER DISTIR..

1. No heritage resoutces w e r e found di~ring an intensive survey of a11 are- that would be disturbed by the const.tuction. Construction w i l l be haltad. immediately and the Dtstrict Ranger rmeified if any heritage resources are discovered,

2. Construction across the Grey8 Rivet Road must be completed within a 24 hour period to minimize impacts on traffic,

3. The road surface.wil1 be restoxed t o present ~ i d t h and surface conditions ae soon as possible following backf Flling. Backfill w i l l be compacted sufficiently to prevent settlement and bladed t o restore the current grade and prism af the road.

4 . A l l cuts and fills w i l l be ae a maxl:num of 3:L slope.

5 . Construction yiL1 be Limited the period froa June 15 t o November 15, to minhize potential impacts on wildlffe rigration. calving and use of the winter range.

6 . Avoid bottoms of natuzal dcainsgeways t o minimi~a future emrircnnant.1 problems.

7. Sediment control naaaures t o be used as needed include: a. Sett l ing basins at base of tranc'hes on steep slopas. b. Water bars will be constructed along the p ipe l ine route m d other disturbed areas as specified by the District Ranger. e . Construct physical barriers to prohibit vehicle travel on the completed pipeline route. These will be constructed af soil or native materials as approved in advance by the District Ranger.

8. Topsoil w i l l be stockpiled at locatj.ons approved by the District Ranger and used t o cover the trench and disturbad areas around the tanks.

9 . A l l disturbed soils (except on surface of Greys River Road) w i l l be seeded vfth a seed mix specified by the District Ranger and revegetated to the satisfaction of the bisrrict Ranger.

10. Pipe must be buried *at l mst 30 inches (30") deep, a r pernittee must agree ta nave pipelins.ff necessary P Q ~ ftltuxe wad fapxovement and maintenance.

11. Any cuLvasts disturbed by conatruetion must: be reget or trplaced.

12, Any damage done to existing pipe1.Ln.s or other imp#ovsnents.curtently in place must be repaired before continuing with construction wotk,

13. All excess excavated material will be removed t o a designated location or o f f the National Forest.

16. Disturbance a t the tank sites will be l in i eed eo that actually needed for construction. A temporary fence w i l l be placed around each r i t e , in a location specified by the District Ranger, t o physically limit the movement of equipment t o the s p e c i f i e d area.

15. Only thoae trees which have been approved and marked by the D i s t r i c t Ranger may bo cut or removed.


16. The access roads w i l l be closed co motorized use by the general public by placing gates at the Forest Boundary. ~ e y g t o the locks will be provided t o the District Ranger, U s e of these roads after construction is complete w i t 1 be foe maintenance- purposes only, liaited t o once per month, and coordifiatsd with local. Wyoming Came

17. t h e water storage tank s i t e s will not be pe~manently fenced.

18. All disturbed areas w i l l be inspected annually for the pxerence 00 noxious weeds. Should weeds be present. tho permittee rill treat then, with methods approved in advance by the District: Ranger, t o oradicata they end prevent thefr spread.

19. The lands withdrawn by Public w and Order. 155 w i l l be closed t o a l l human presence from November 16 to A p r i l 30 inclusive, except for the maintenance use described above.

U n i i t ~ d S t a t e s Department of ~ g : : i c u l cure

Forest Sexvice

3REYS RIVER RD

Greys River f.;O

Re:??y t o : 2720 Date: January 8 , 1996

Su'bj e c t : Town of A l p i n e S p e c i a l Use Permit for Water System

To: File

I have-tevaluatedn ths:if eec forsrhio'-perait~ acco]:dinggI to the cr i eeria in FSH 2709.11 - Special Uses Handbook, WO Anolondoent: 2709.11-911-8. None of the condi t ions under 31.22a apply t o this permittee.

The permittee is a local government ent:iry, and qualifies for a F'~l1 Fee Waiver, as s t a t e d in 31.22b.

MESIA WMAN District Ranger