thinking with data: a cross-contextual approach to data literacy

22
Thinking with Data: A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy www.rcet.org/twd/index.html

Upload: caroun

Post on 15-Jan-2016

61 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Thinking with Data: A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy. www.rcet.org/twd/index.html. TWD Modules & Materials. Four 2-week, integrated replacement modules For implementation in 7th grade social studies, mathematics, science, and English Language arts classes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Thinking with Data: A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data

Literacy

www.rcet.org/twd/index.html

Page 2: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

TWD Modules & Materials

• Four 2-week, integrated replacement modules

• For implementation in 7th grade social studies, mathematics, science, and English Language arts classes

• Designed to develop students’ deep understanding of data literacy across the curriculum.

• The modules will address issues of data representation, common measure, and proportional reasoning using real data in discipline-specific problem-solving contexts

• Grounded in a preparation for future learning (PFL) pedagogical approach

• An overall data literacy assessment, and “local” assessments

Page 3: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Why Data Literacy?

“We use data every day—to choose medications or health practices, to decide on a place to live, or to make judgments about education policy and practice. The newspapers and TV news are full of data about nutrition, side effects of popular drugs, and polls for current elections. Surely there is valuable information here, but how do you judge the reliability of what you read, see, or hear? This is no trivial skill—and we are not preparing students to make these critical and subtle distinctions.”

-- Andee Rubin

Page 4: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Data Literacy Standards

Data literacy requirement

MS standards– SS (NCSS)

MS standards– math (NCTM)

MS standards– science (NSES)

MS standards– ELA (NCTE)

Formulate and answer data-

based questions

“Formulate historical questions, obtain data, question &identify gaps in data & construct sound interpretations”

“Formulate questions, design studies & collect data about characteristics shared by 2 populations, or different characteristics within 1 population”

“Identify questions that can be answered through scientific investigations; develop the ability to refine & refocus broad & ill-defined questions”

“Conduct research on issues & interests by generating ideas & questions & posing problems”

Use appropriate data, tools, &

representations

“Use appropriate geographical tools such as atlases, database systems, charts, graphs & maps to generate, manipulate & interpret information”

“Select, create & use appropriate graphical representations of data; discuss & understand the correspondence between data sets & their representations”

“Use appropriate tools & techniques to gather, analyze & interpret data, guided by the question asked & the investigations designed”

“Gather, evaluate & synthesize data from a variety of sources to communicate discoveries in ways that suit their purpose & audience”

Develop and evaluate data-

based inferences & explanations

“Encourage increasingly abstract thought as learners use data & apply skills in analyzing human behavior in relation to physical & cultural environments.”

“Use observations about differences between 2 or more samples to make conjectures about populations, formulate new questions, & studies to answer them”

“Formulate questions, design & execute investigations, interpret data, use evidence to generate explanations; propose alteratives & critique explanations & procedures”

“Use spoken, written & visual language to accomplish purposes (eg. learning, enjoyment, persuasion & exchange of information)”

Page 5: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Preparation for Future Learning:TWD Across the Middle School Curriculum

Social Studies

English Language

Arts

ScienceMathematics

preparation application communicationtelling

PFL PFL PFL PFL PFL PFLPFLPFL PFL PFLPFL

Page 6: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

The Context: World Water Issues

"The Earth, with its diverse and abundant life forms, including over six billion humans, is facing a serious water crisis. All the signs suggest that it is getting worse and will continue to do so, unless corrective action is taken. The crisis is one of governance, essentially caused by the ways in which humans have mismanaged water.”

--World Water Development Report (United Nations, 2000)

Page 7: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Social Studies: Fair Allocation of Water in the Tigris/Euphrates River Basin

•Cradle of civilization

•Water shared by & critically important to 3 countries – not enough water to meet needs

•Ongoing modern conflict around differing notions of water rights – “sovereignty over resources” vs. “historical rights”

(De Villiers, 2000)

Page 8: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Social Studies: Considering Differing Position

StatementsTurkey’s position

Turkey is basing its claims on the sovereignty principle. It is saying that the rivers are transboundary, meaning that it has control over the rivers while they are in Turkey, just like other natural resources such as oil or coal.

Suleyman Demirel (President of Turkey) at the 1992 dedication of the Ataturk Dam: “Neither Syria nor Iraq can lay claim to Turkey’s rivers any more than Ankara could claim their oil … The water resources are Turkey’s, the oil resources are theirs. We don’t say we share their oil resources, and they can’t say they share our water resources.”

Page 9: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Syria’s position

Syria argues they've always used the water from the Euphrates and their right to use it should be no different today or in the future. They say it is an international river, and Turkey should not be able to decide on its own how much water from the Euphrates flows into Syria and Iraq. This is called the historical principle.

Syria wants to share the water in the Tigris and Euphrates through a “mathematical formula” with each State shall declaring its demands on the rivers separately.

Social Studies: Considering Differing Position

Statements

Page 10: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Iraq’s position

Iraq also argues the historical principle, that they have been using the water from the Tigris and Euphrates for thousands of years, that they are international rivers, and Turkey should not be able to decide on its own how much water from the Tigris and Euphrates it will let flow into Syria and Iraq.

Iraq wants to share the water using a different mathematical formula. Each country will notify a three-country committee of its water demand for each project that is completed, under construction, or planned. The committee will then calculate the demands for water and decide. In addition, Iraq wants Turkey to release more water in the Euphrates river, to be more “equitable and fair.”

Social Studies: Considering Differing Position

Statements

Page 11: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

SS: UN Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International

Watercourses

GENERAL PRINCIPLES (Article 5):

1. Watercourse States shall in their respective territories utilize an international watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner. In particular, an international watercourse shall be used and developed by watercourse States with a view to attaining optimal and sustainable utilization thereof and benefits therefrom, taking into account the interests of the watercourse States concerned, consistent with adequate protection of the watercourse.

2. Watercourse States shall participate in the use, development and protection of an international watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner. Such participation includes both the right to utilize the watercourse and the duty to cooperate in the protection and development thereof, as provided in the present Convention.

Page 12: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Social Studies Module Overview

Page 13: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Mathematics: Common Measure, Proportional Reasoning & Mathematical

Arguments

A

C

B

Who has more?

Page 14: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Mathematics: Common Measure, Proportional Reasoning & Mathematical

Arguments

Do states that are more rural grow the most

corn?

Page 15: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Mathematics Module Overview

Page 16: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Science: The Water CycleImplications & Unintended

Consequences

Page 17: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Science: The Water CycleImplications & Unintended

Consequences

To dam or not to dam?

Page 18: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Science: The Water CycleImplications & Unintended

Consequences

Page 19: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Science Module Overview

Page 20: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

English Language Arts: Persuasive Argument

datadata

datadata

Argument

Page 21: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

English Language Arts Overview

Page 22: Thinking with Data:  A Cross-Contextual Approach to Data Literacy

Timeline

1/07 9/076/07 1/08 6/08 9/08 1/09 6/09 9/09

initial materials development

initial assessment development

Advisory Board input

teacher training & input

refinement of materials

pilot testing in AT&T classroom

further refinement of TWD materials

creation of TPD materials

Advisory Board input

data analysis

final revisions

dissemination

WE ARE HERE

field testing in 2 Ohio middle schools