things to come - review of uk budget from a green perspective

Upload: davidlouisshaw

Post on 04-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Things to Come - Review of UK Budget from a Green Perspective

    1/4

    policy

    Amongst economics com-

    mentators it is generally

    accepted that there are

    budget statements from

    the Chancellor of the Exchequer that

    are more significant than others;

    that delivered on 21 March would

    certainly count as one of the more

    significant. Perhaps predictably, the

    reasons for this are explicitly political.

    It was Gordon Browns last budget;

    there is a revived threat to Labours

    position in the form of a Blair-like

    Conservative party leader; and there

    is a fierce battle to occupy both the

    centre and environmentally friendly

    ground.

    The prominence of energy in policyand the budget has, however, always

    been high. Previous budgets have

    involved privatisation, decisions on

    funding for nuclear power, inflation

    concerns due to oil crises and, lat-

    terly, global warming. The produc-

    tion of energy is a matter of national

    interest: the second golden age of

    British industry after the second world

    war was arguably crushed by eco-

    nomic instability around oil prices.

    The discovery of North Sea oil and

    the dash for gas in the 1980s have

    been a financial windfall for the UK

    until now.

    Instability

    Today, the UK finds itself being a net

    importer of gas from Europe and en-

    ergy supplies are increasingly threat-

    ened by the unreliable and unstableconditions in oil and gas producing

    nations. Price is increasing; supplies

    are shortening. Indeed, energy prices

    have risen so much that the Bank of

    England highlighted them as one of

    the key reasons for the peak rate of

    inflation seen earlier this year, which

    led to increases in interest rates.

    Against this backdrop, the UK has

    decided to take a lead role in setting

    carbon emission targets. Indeed,

    while only required under the Kyoto

    Protocol to cut greenhouse gas emis-

    sions by 12.5 per cent compared to

    1990 levels by 2010, the govern-

    ment set a self-imposed target for the

    UK of a 20 per cent reduction. The

    Kyoto target will almost certainly be

    met, but the latest projections show

    that the UK is on target for only a 15

    to 18 per cent reduction in emissionsby 2010. A further aspirational target

    of a 60 per cent reduction by 2050 is

    also in place.

    Things to come

    Dave Shaw, energy consultant, at Carbon Trust-accreditedconsultancy Efficiency Direct wonders if Gordon Browns last budget

    was green enough

  • 7/30/2019 Things to Come - Review of UK Budget from a Green Perspective

    2/4

    15

    Luckily, saving energy means saving

    money on both a micro and macro

    level, and if the UK can take a lead

    role in the development of energy

    saving technologies, then this may

    help to address the countrys balance

    of payments deficit. So just what was

    in the most recent budget to promote

    energy efficiency and the UK as a

    world leader in the field?

    Business, the Chancellor said,

    accounted for 40 per cent of UK

    greenhouse gas emissions (princi-

    pally carbon dioxide) and that, since

    1997, business and government

    together have achieved a 25 per

    cent reduction in the carbon intensity

    of the economy. While the statistics

    may prove this to be true, how much

    of this is attributable to the decline of

    manufacturing in the UK is debatable

    but no doubt significant.

    Complication

    Some accuse the UK of having one

    of the more complex tax systems in

    the world. Part of the reason for this

    is the way in which the Chancellor

    raises and indirectly cuts taxes. It

    seems, in effect, that taxes are simply

    increased for everyone and those for

    whom they would have an undue

    adverse effect (e.g. small businesses,

    pensioners, low income households)

    should claim allowances to offset the

    greater burden placed on them.

    To this end, as well as raising

    corporation tax for small business

    and cutting corporation tax for large

    business (according to the Engineer-

    ing Employers Federation firms are

    paying almost 12billion more in

    tax in 2008/9 than they were whenLabour came to power), the Chan-

    cellor introduced a new environ-

    mental tax credit for environmental

    investment.

    This tax credit will be worth 40mil-

    lion a year. How it is new and

    different from the already established

    Enhanced Capital Allowances (ECA)

    scheme was unclear from the com-

    mons statement. ECAs allow the

    cost of an environmentally friendly

    technology (such as an inverter

    drive), which is on the Environmen-

    tal Technology List, to be written

    off against corporation tax in year

    one, rather than as depreciation

    over time. In the detail of the main

    Treasury report, it is stated:

    The Government also introduced

    enhanced capital allowances for

    energy-saving technologies, with

    over 14,000 approved products

    now eligible for support. The

    Government has commissioned an

    independent review of the effective-ness of the ECA for energy-saving

    technology, which will be published

    later this year. It was announced that

    the Government will also introduce

    a payable enhanced capital allow-

    ance for companies not in taxable

    profit to ensure both profit and loss

    making firms have an incentive for

    energy-saving technology. Increased

    funding for the Carbon Trust, which

    provides businesses with advice on

    improving their energy efficiency as

    well as interest-free loans to fund

    capital energy-saving projects such

    as lighting, insulation and boilers,

    was also part of the Climate Change

    Levy (CCL) package. In 2004 to

    2005, the Carbon Trust worked with

    over 2,800 organisations, result-

    ing in cost savings of 200million

    for business. So now, companiesthat do not have profits can benefit

    financially from using environmentally

    friendly options.

    Staying with small- and medium-

    sized enterprises, more money was

    also promised to offer energy audits

    and advice through the Carbon

    Trust and Regional Development

    Agencies (RDAs). The RDAs will pro-

    mote streamlined advice on resource

    efficiency delivered through Business

    Links. In total, the advice, sup-

    port and incentives available from

    Business Links and the RDAs for envi-

    ronmental improvement and innova-

    tion, including for small businesses,

    will rise from 140million this year to

    240million next year.

    Forefront

    The small company R&D tax credit

    will be raised from 150 per cent to

    175 per cent from April 2008 and

    the large company rate will also rise

    from 125 per cent to 130 per cent.It is hoped that much of this will be

    used in order to help the UK stay at

    the forefront of developing environ-

    mentally friendly and carbon neutral

    technologies of the sort that will at-

    tract environmental tax credits.

    The Secretary for Industry, the Chan-

    cellor announced, would also be

    announcing a competition to develop

    the UKs first full scale carbon capture

  • 7/30/2019 Things to Come - Review of UK Budget from a Green Perspective

    3/4

    policy

    and storage project, the results of

    which would be announced in 2008.

    Carbon capture is a process by which

    carbon produced from the burning of

    fossil fuels (e.g. at power stations) can

    be captured and buried, for example,

    under the seabed. At this stage in the

    technologys development, the cap-

    ture part has been successful but stor-age has proved harder to complete.

    As well as for businesses, measures

    were announced for households,

    including insulation and green tech-

    nology grants and steps intended to

    gear the housing market to be more

    favourable toward carbon neutral

    homes. Commitments were also

    made with respect to transport, where

    it was announced that biofuels will,

    by 2010, account for 5 per cent of

    all fuel in road vehicles, and by 2020

    this could possibly be 20 per cent. 4x4

    drivers were also hit hard with severe

    rises in car tax.

    A further action in the budget with

    respect to energy was the announce-

    ment that CCL, the levy imposed on

    each unit of fossil fuel purchased,

    would now be linked to inflation.

    Previously, this had remained ata static rate of 0.043p/kWh on

    electricity and 0.015p/kWh on gas.

    Whilst an increase in CCL is most

    definitely warranted (it helps to fund

    the Carbon Trust, for example) it could

    be questioned whether this is a step

    far enough.

    The current CCL level is simply not

    high enough to bring about the

    change in business activity that it was

    designed to. By linking it to the rate

    of inflation, it will move at the samerate as other prices and therefore in

    effect stay at the same relative level.

    Energy and fuel taxes, as shown by the

    fuel protests at the turn of the century,

    are a contentious and emotive issue.

    However, if they are set below the level

    at which they change the activity they

    are supposed to (in this case energy

    consumption), then they simply and

    quietly raise money for the treasury.

    Allowances

    In addition to this criticism, the pay

    tax and claim the benefit system is

    one that can arguably only work if

    those who are entitled to allowances

    actually claim them. Otherwise, once

    again, the treasury does not have to

    part with money set aside to offset

    the effect of taxes for those who are

    disproportionately and unnecessarilyaffected. It is doubtful that anywhere

    near as much of the money put aside

    for allowances is ever claimed as it

    could or should be.

    The move toward carbon pric-

    ing, via the EU Emissions Trading

    Scheme is welcome, but whilst the

    UK is leading the way with respect

    to the scheme, it still needs further

    reform. For the lowest emitters in the

    scheme, the administrative burden

    is high, and while this is being ad-dressed to a certain extent in the

    schemes second phase (2008 to

    2012), more could be done to ease

    the pressure on such installations.

    The price of carbon too, while sub-

    ject to the market, requires further

    control the price of a tonne of car-

    bon dipped below 1 in February

    of this year. Whilst the Chancellor

    could not address this in his budget,

    representation at an EU level needs

    to be made to ensure confidence in

    the system.

    Whilst representing clients in the EU

    Emissions Scheme, Efficiency Direct

    has found that the current price of

    carbon, like the level at which the

    CCL is set, provides no financial

    incentive to begin the monitoring

    and management of carbon emis-

    sions. In the companys experience,the only driver is the threat of a civil

    law suit.

    www.efficiencydirect.co.uk

  • 7/30/2019 Things to Come - Review of UK Budget from a Green Perspective

    4/4

    17