thermal convection in a ferrofluid supported by thermodiffusion _odenbach(2005)
TRANSCRIPT
8/19/2019 Thermal Convection in a Ferrofluid Supported by Thermodiffusion _Odenbach(2005)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/thermal-convection-in-a-ferrofluid-supported-by-thermodiffusion-odenbach2005 1/4
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 289 (2005) 122–125
Thermal convection in a ferrofluid supported
by thermodiffusion
S. Odenbach, Th. Vo ¨ lker
ZARM, University of Bremen, Am Fallturm, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
Available online 26 November 2004
Abstract
Convective motion has been investigated in a ferrofluid layer heated from below. In contrast to normal experiments
on thermal convection in fluids, the focus of this investigation was devoted to the destabilizing effect of the density
redistribution in the fluid forced by thermal diffusion of the magnetic particles relative to the carrier liquid. It could be
shown that the fluid layer is destabilized at a temperature difference well below the critical limit for a one-component
fluid. It was found that the convective flow is stable in time and the measured convection amplitude could be fitted with
a theory given by Hollinger et al. (Phys. Rev. E 57 (1997) 4).
r 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PACS: 75.50.Mm; 47.27.i; 44.90.+c
Keywords: Soret effect; Thermal convection
1. Introduction
The phenomenon of thermal convection appearing in
a flat fluid layer heated from below and cooled at the
upper surface is well known from the literature since
more than 100 years [2]. The driving force for the
flow can easily be understood if one remembers that
the temperature gradient causes a density gradient in the
fluid (see Fig. 1). If it is now assumed that a volume
element of the fluid is displaced adiabatically in the
direction of the density gradient, it will experience aresulting body force in the direction of the displacement
due to the buoyancy in the gravitational field. Equally a
displacement in the opposite direction will also cause a
resulting force in the direction of the displacement, and
it is thus clear that the buoyancy has destabilizing
character for the fluid layer since it can amplify
stochastic disturbance of the stratification. A convective
flow will set in as soon as the destabilizing buoyant force
will overcome the stabilizing effects of viscous friction
and thermal conductivity in the fluid. The actual
situation of the system is usually described by a
dimensionless parameter, the Rayleigh number Ra:
Ra ¼ bTrgDTd 3
kZ
; (1)
where bT denotes the thermal expansion coefficient, r
the density, Z the dynamic viscosity, x the thermometric
conductivity of the fluid, DT the temperature difference
between the plates, d their spatial distance, and g the
gravitational acceleration. Convection appears if the
actual Rayleigh number exceeds a certain critical value
Ra which depends on the boundary conditions.
Since, in an experiment with a given geometry and a
fluid with fixed properties, the driving force for the
ARTICLE IN PRESS
www.elsevier.com/locate/jmmm
0304-8853/$ - see front matterr 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.036
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 421 2184785;
fax: +49 421 2182521.
E-mail address: [email protected]
(S. Odenbach).
8/19/2019 Thermal Convection in a Ferrofluid Supported by Thermodiffusion _Odenbach(2005)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/thermal-convection-in-a-ferrofluid-supported-by-thermodiffusion-odenbach2005 2/4
convective flow is only determined by the temperature
difference applied between the bounding plates, thecritical Rayleigh number gives directly a critical
temperature difference necessary to drive the convec-
tion. This critical temperature difference DT is equiva-
lent to a critical density difference Dr:In a binary mixture the temperature gradient will not
only lead to a density gradient due to thermal expansion
of the fluid, but also to a separation of the components
due to thermodiffusion. This separation will create an
additional density difference in the fluid which has to be
combined with the one driven by thermal expansion. If
the Soret coefficient S T —describing the thermodiffusive
demixing of the fluid—is positive, the material transport
is directed towards the cold plate of the arrangement.
Thus, assuming that the component transported by the
Soret effect has a higher density than the surrounding
medium—as it is obviously true for a ferrofluid where
the magnetic particles are moving with respect to the
carrier liquid—the thermodiffusive transport will en-
hance the density gradient established by the tempera-
ture difference in the fluid. This can lead to a situation in
which the temperature difference is smaller than the
critical one for the one-component fluid in a certain
arrangement DT 0 but the density gradient is large
enough to drive convection. The relative influence of
thermal and concentrational density changes is de-scribed by the separation ratio c ¼ S Tbc=bT; where bc
denotes the concentrational expansion coefficient. The
phenomenon of convective flow driven by thermodiffu-
sion is well known from molecular mixtures where the
diffusion coefficient is large—leading to a fast demixing
of the system—while the Soret coefficient is small,
producing only small concentration differences and
therefore also small density differences in the fluid.
For such liquids the separation ratio gains values in the
order of c 0:1: In contrast, the Soret coefficient has
been found to be very large in ferrofluids [3] where S T ¼
0:15 K1
has been measured. Together with the great
density difference between the particles and the carrier
liquid, this leads to high separation ratios in the range
order of 100–1000. For such high values of c;remarkably large convection amplitudes have been
predicted in Refs. [1] and [4].
2. Experimental setup
To investigate Soret-driven convection in ferrofluids,
we have set up an experiment consisting of a flat layer of
magnetic fluid with a diameter of 150 mm and a fluid
layer thickness of 5 mm. The layer is cooled at the top
and heated from the bottom by means of water loops
yielding a temperature stability of the bounding plates of
0.01K. The detection of the thermal flow in the fluid is
carried out by a set of temperature probes located at the
cold side of the fluid layer. The temperature probes—so-
called microthermistors—have a mean diameter of 0.5 mm and allow a resolution of the temperature
measurement of approximately 1 mK. Thirteen of these
probes have been arranged in cross form in the center of
the upper bounding plate.
Measuring the temperature distribution along the
lines spanned by the microthermistors, one can obtain
the convection amplitude a from the sinoidal tempera-
ture signal generated by the fluid flow (see Fig. 2).
The ferrofluid used in the experiments is a commercial
fluid APG516A from Ferrotec containing 2 vol% of
magnetite in oil. The Soret coefficient of this ferrofluid
has been determined to be S T ¼ 0:16 K
1
: In theexperiments, the fluid has been mixed carefully before
the start of the experiment. Afterwards, both plates have
been set to a common mean temperature of 25C: This
temperature has been kept constant for 2 h to allow
equilibration of the system. Afterwards the temperature
difference has been established by a stepwise, symmetric
temperature change on both bounding plates. The
temperature profile measured by means of the micro-
thermistors has been monitored until the equilibrium
situation has been reached. From this final profile the
amplitude of the convective flow can be estimated and
thus, measuring temperature profiles for various tem-
perature differences between the plates, one can
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 1. Principle sketch of the experimental situation for an
explanation of the convective driving force.
Fig. 2. Sketch for the explanation of the technique used to
measure the convection amplitude.
S. Odenbach, Th. Vo lker / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 289 (2005) 122–125 123
8/19/2019 Thermal Convection in a Ferrofluid Supported by Thermodiffusion _Odenbach(2005)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/thermal-convection-in-a-ferrofluid-supported-by-thermodiffusion-odenbach2005 3/4
determine the dependence of the convection amplitude
on the Rayleigh number.
3. Experimental results
Fig. 3 shows an example of temperature distribution
along one of the lines of thermistors measured for a
Rayleigh number larger than Ra0 : Here Ra
0 denotes the
critical Rayleigh number for the experimental setup and
a one-component fluid. It should be noted that the
wavelength of the temperature distribution does not
equal two times the thickness of the fluid layer. This is a
result of the fact that the convection rolls have a finite
angle with the thermistor line. Taking the results of both
lines together, one finds a wavelength of the convective
flow of ð10:1 0:2Þ mm which fits well to the fluid layer
thickness of 5 mm.
Measuring these temperature distributions for varioustemperature differences and plotting the square of the
amplitude of the distribution against DT (see Fig. 4)
provides the possibility to determine the critical tem-
perature difference DT 0 and thus the critical Rayleigh
number Ra0: This is possible since the influence of the
Soret effect on the convective flow is small well above
Ra0: Thus the normal linear extrapolation of a2ðDT Þ to
a2 ¼ 0 can be used to find DT 0 ¼ ð5:0 0:2Þ K for the
system investigated here.
It is obvious from Fig. 4 that a significant increase of
the convection amplitude appears for temperature
difference below or close to D
T
0 —a fact clearlyindicating the presence of a contribution of the Soret
effect to the destabilizing forces driving the convective
flow.
To compare the measured effects with the theory in
Ref. [1], Fig. 5 shows the amplitude of convection—
measured over a wide range of temperature differ-
ences—as a function of the reduced Rayleigh number ;which is defined by
¼ Ra Ra
0
Ra0
: (2)
In the figure the dotted line represents the typical
square root increase of the amplitude as is expected for a
one-component fluid. Again it is clearly observed that a
strong convective flow appears below DT 0 : The solid
line is a fit of the theoretical dependence of the
amplitude on as is given in Ref. [1]. The free fit
parameter is the separation ratio c which is determined
from the fit to be c ¼ 1850 100: It should be
noted that long-term measurements have shown that
the convective flow is stable over time and that
no oscillations of the convection amplitude can be
observed.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 3. Temperature distribution measured along one of the
lines of thermistors for a temperature difference of 9 K between
the upper and lower bounding plate of the fluid layer.
Fig. 4. Amplitude of the temperature distribution as a function
of the temperature difference. The solid line is a fit to the
experimental data for values of DT above 7.5K.
Fig. 5. Amplitude of convection as a function of with a fit of
the theory in Ref. [1].
S. Odenbach, Th. Vo lker / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 289 (2005) 122–125124
8/19/2019 Thermal Convection in a Ferrofluid Supported by Thermodiffusion _Odenbach(2005)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/thermal-convection-in-a-ferrofluid-supported-by-thermodiffusion-odenbach2005 4/4
4. Conclusion and outlook
The influence of the Soret effect on thermal convec-
tion in magnetic fluids has been investigated. From a
comparison between the experimental data and the
theory in Ref. [1], it has been found that the separation
ratio in the fluid investigated here takes a high value of
c ¼ 1850: This opens for the future the possibility to
perform an experimental proof of the square roll flow
pattern which has been predicted in Ref. [1]. Further-
more, the influence of magnetic field on the Soret effect
as well as on the convection itself opens a wide field for
new investigations.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to Prof. M. Lu ¨ cke for
inspiring discussions.
References
[1] S. Hollinger, M. Lu ¨ cke, H. Mu ¨ ller, Phys. Rev. E 57 (1997) 4.
[2] H. Be ´ nard, Revue gen. des Science, 1900.
[3] Th. Vo ¨ lker, E. Blums, S. Odenbach, Magnetohydro-
dynamics 37 (2001) 3.
[4] A. Ryskin, H. Mu ¨ ller, H. Pleiner, Magnetohydrodynamics
39 (2003) 51.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Odenbach, Th. Vo lker / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 289 (2005) 122–125 125