theory and applications lecture 2: different approximations for the exchange...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Band calculations:Band calculations:Theory and ApplicationsTheory and Applications
• Local density approximation (LDA) • Generalized gradient approximation (GGA)• LDA+U• LDA+DMFT
http://alps.comp-phys.org/mediawiki-1.9.3/index.php/DFT-short-course
Lecture 2:Lecture 2: Different approximations for the Different approximations for the exchangeexchange--correlation functional in DFTcorrelation functional in DFT
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
2
DFT: Short summary from previous lecture
Hohenberg-Kohn:
Thomas-Fermi-Dirac: For non-interacting electron gas:
For any electronic system:
Kinetic energy
Coulomb repulsion
Exchange interaction
Kohn-Sham: Real, interacting system
Reference, non-interacting system
But with some strange term
+
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
3
DFT: Kohn-Sham equations (1965)
Kohn-Shamequations
XC energy:
XC potential: It acts locally, but may know about density distribution
in other points
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
4
LDA: Local density approximation for Exc[n]
The key point in DFT is an explicit form The key point in DFT is an explicit form EExcxc[n[n]. ].
LDA: exchange-correlation energy density equals toexchange-correlation energy density of homogeneous electronic gas in given point
LDALDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
due to Dirac (see TFD theory)
It is local in sense that it knows only density in given point
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
5
was obtained from QMC simulation for varying densities [PRL 45, 566 (1980)]
And latter interpolated by Vosko, Wilk and NusairCan. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980):
LDA: Local density approximation for Exc[n]
LDALDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
,
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
6
ExtensionExtension ofof LDA: LDA: LocalLocal SpinSpin DensityDensity ApproximationApproximation (LSDA)(LSDA)
LDALSDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
7
Advantages and disadvantages of L(S)DAAdvantages and disadvantages of L(S)DA
LDALSDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
• Structural properties of solids are often goodè usually underestimates bulk lattice constants by a small amount:
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
8
Advantages and disadvantages of L(S)DAAdvantages and disadvantages of L(S)DA
LDALSDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
• Structural properties of solids are often goodè usually underestimates bulk lattice constants by a small amount è phonons too stiff LSDA
EXP
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
9
AdvantagesAdvantages andand disadvantagesdisadvantages ofof L(S)DAL(S)DA
LDALSDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
• Structural properties of solids are often goodè usually underestimates bulk lattice constants by a small amount è phonons too stiff
• As a result binding energies are too large
This is due to the fact, that L(S)DA favors electronic densities that are more homogeneous than they should be;
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
10
LDALDA and LSDAand LSDA: : Where they should and should not work ?Where they should and should not work ?
• will work good for isotropic and homogeneous system such as metals.
a) Isolated molecules
+-
LDALSDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
Generally one may expect that
• will be problematic for the description of inhomogeneous systems such as e.g.
b) Polarized insulators
c) Strongly correlated materials
++
--
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
11
GGA: GGA: Generalized Gradient ApproximationGeneralized Gradient Approximation
LDALSDAGGAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
Idea: Taylor expansion of the density near “homogeneous gas point”
GGA generally improves magnetic energies (with respect to LSDA)
Total energy calculations for FeTotal energy calculations for Fe
LSDA GGA
J. Phys.: Cond. Matter10, 5081 (1998)
one of contrary instances: PRB 65, 132104 (2002)
Experiment: Experiment: FM, bccFM, bcc
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
12
GGA: GGA: GeneralizedGeneralized GradientGradient ApproximationApproximation
LDALSDAGGAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
Lattice constants:
GGA sometimes gives better agreement in structural constants, than LDAPDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
13
AbAb--initioinitio HH22O O treatmenttreatment
LDALSDAGGAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
metaGGA
GGA
For the description of isolated molecules nor For the description of isolated molecules nor L(S)DA neither GGA cannot be used !L(S)DA neither GGA cannot be used !
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
14
L(S)DA L(S)DA oror GGA: GGA: bandband gapgap problemproblem
LDALSDAGGAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
Band gap for correlated oxides
Important: Kohn-Sham orbital energies have NO explicit physical meaning!
In general they are no more than orbital energies of some auxiliary Kohn-Sham system.
Thus are even not owed to give correct gap !
But, this is not only uncomfortable...PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
15
Example of inappropriate use of LDA:
LDALSDAGGAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
TiTi--Ti Ti dimerdimers s –– has triplet ground state, has triplet ground state,
i.e. FM !?i.e. FM !?
Analysis of GGA results:
Ti3+: d1
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
16
L(S)DA L(S)DA oror GGA: GGA: bandband gapgap problemproblem
LDALSDAGGAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+DMFT
Experiment:
NiO: CT insulator
Band gap: ~ 4 eV
Crystal fieldsplitting
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
17
LDA+U: Different treatment of LDA+U: Different treatment of physically physically different electrons:different electrons:
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+ULDA+U
LDA+DMFT
s,p – electrons are considered on LDA level
d – electron part of functional is corrected,as it is done in model approaches (Hubbard)
double counting term
occupied states :
unoccupied states :
Anisimov et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9 (1997) 767PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
18
Very simple LDA+U example:
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+ULDA+U
LDA+DMFT
Eexact(H) = 1.0 Ry
ELDA(H) = 0.957 Ry ~ Eexact(H)
eLDA (H) = 0.538 Ry << Eexact (H)
Ionization energy of Hydrogen atom:
Calculated U = 0.9448 Ry
Occupied (H) state:eLDA+U = eLDA (H) + U/2 = 1.0104 Ry = 1 Ry
Unoccupied (H+) state:eLDA+U(H+) = eLDA (H) - U/2 = 0.0656 Ry ~0 Ry
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
19
LDA+U LDA+U resultsresults forfor TMOTMO
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+ULDA+U
LDA+DMFT
Problems of LDA+U:
• How to chose U ?• How to chose DC term ?
LDA+U for NiO:U=8 eV, J=0.85 eV
Correct gap,NiO: CT - insulator
Anisimov et al.,J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9 (1997) 767
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
20
LDA+U: How to chose U ? Calculate it !
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+ULDA+U
LDA+DMFT
We want to compute U, from LDA,We want to compute U, from LDA,but how much Coulomb interaction is in the LDA? but how much Coulomb interaction is in the LDA?
LetLet’’s think that:s think that:
In atomic limit:In atomic limit:
So in LDA:So in LDA:
This derivative can be estimatedThis derivative can be estimatednumerically in supernumerically in super--cell calculation:cell calculation:
orbital energy
center of gravity
occupancy
DC termDC term
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
21
Conduction band
LDA+U: How to chose U ? Calculate it !LDA+U: How to chose U ? Calculate it !
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+ULDA+U
LDA+DMFT
dn-1 dn+1
ee
Thus, since U can be calculated, Thus, since U can be calculated, LDA+U can be considered as LDA+U can be considered as
fully fully abab--initioinitio..
Important: this type of calculation takes into account screening
Drawback: unfortunately calculated values of U strongly depends on the details of calculation (method, RMT, allowed screening channels)!
ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
22
LDA+U: LDA+U: HowHow to to chosechose DC ? DC ? NoNo definitedefinite answeranswer..
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+ULDA+U
LDA+DMFT
In simple LDA:
Let's think that correlated electrons can be described, as
,
NiO in LDA+Uwith differentDC terms:
(1) Fully localized limit: works for strongly correlated materials
(2) Near MF limit: works for materials with intermediatecorrelation strength
PRB 48, 16929 (1993) PRB 67, 153106 (2003)
Due to hybridization and non-liniarity Ec, it's not easy to extract the part of e-e Coulomb repulsion taken into account on LDA level for TM-d orbitals.
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
23
LDA+DMFT: The way to include dynamical LDA+DMFT: The way to include dynamical correlations on the top correlations on the top realreal band structure.band structure.
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+LDA+DMFTDMFT
LDA: Reality:
T≠0
nstart n VH(k)
Hscf(k)
G(τ)Imp. solver
LDA loop
DMFT loop
FULLSCF loop
,,Pay attention: most of the LDA+DMFT calculations presently available are not self-consistent !
There are very few exceptions where authors repeat LDA part after scf DMFT solution:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 096405 (2008)
Phys. Rev. B 71, 125119 (2005)
cond-mat/0106308
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
24
LDA+DMFT: The way to include dynamical LDA+DMFT: The way to include dynamical correlations on the top correlations on the top realreal band structure.band structure.
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+LDA+DMFTDMFT
nstart n VH(k)
Hscf(k)
G(τ)Imp. solver
LDA loop
DMFT loop
FULLSCF loop
,,
Q: When full self consistent LDA+DMFT needed ?A: When the number of electrons is changed significantly
Ce-alpha
LDA: n=1.19LDA+DMFT: n=1.06
Other problems of LDA+DMFT:
1) Inherited from LDA+U, DC problem and choice of U,J
2) How to retrieve correlated only part of hamiltonian from LDA ?
3) Specific DMFT problems like choice of solver, temperature etc.
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
25
LDA+DMFT LDA+DMFT calculationcalculation exampleexample: : gammagamma--alphaalpha CeCe
LDALSDAGGA
LDA+U
LDA+LDA+DMFTDMFT
LDA+DMFT
LDA
PES: occ. part IPES: unocc. partPRB 28, 7354 (1983)
PRB 55, 2056 (1997)
Experiments:
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
26
KohnKohn--ShamShamequationsequations
•• Relativistic treatment Relativistic treatment of electrons. of electrons.
•• SemiSemi--relativistic treatment relativistic treatment of electrons (SO only for of electrons (SO only for core level electrons). core level electrons).
Treatment of potential:
•• MTMT--potential, Atomic sphere potential, Atomic sphere approximation (ASA)approximation (ASA) •• Full potentialFull potential
•• PseudopotentialPseudopotential
Choice of wave functions (Method):•• Plane waves (PW)Plane waves (PW) •• Augmented plane waves (APW, LAPW)Augmented plane waves (APW, LAPW) •• MTMT--orbitals (MTO, LMTO)orbitals (MTO, LMTO) •• Lin. Comb. of atomic orbitals (LCAO)Lin. Comb. of atomic orbitals (LCAO) •• Gaussians Gaussians
Approximations for exchange correlation part:
LDALDALSDALSDA
GGAGGA LDA+ULDA+ULDA+DMFTLDA+DMFTmeta GGAmeta GGA
What is the difference between What is the difference between different band structure calculations ?different band structure calculations ?
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com