thecb legislative agenda: aligning funding with student success proposed outcomes-based funding...

8
THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:30 P.M.

Upload: samson-williams

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for

Public Universities

Thursday, March 10, 201110:30 P.M.

Page 2: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

Model Mechanics – point calculations

The THECB recommendation for outcomes-based funding includes the same basic methodology already employed in the existing Performance Incentive funding model.

Points are based on degrees (Undergraduate)

Funding is split between the two point

calculations

Biennial Increase/Decrease

Total Three-Year Average

Page 3: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

10% of Formula = Student Success Metrics

(Outcomes)

½ allocated based on 2-year over 2-year

Increases

½ allocated based on 3-year averages

Equation:

Average of 2009 & 2010 Degrees

MINUS

Average of 2007 & 2008 Degrees

Equation:

SUM

2010, 2009, 2008 Degrees

DIVIDED by

3

Page 4: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

Example of Outcomes Calculation

Biennial Increase/Decrease

YearDegree

s YearDegree

s

2010 400 2008 200

2009 200 2007 1002-Year

Average 300 150

Increase = 300 – 150 = 150

Metric: Undergraduate Degrees

Total 3-Year Average

Year Degrees

2010 400

2009 200

2008 200

3-Year Average = (400 + 200 + 200)/3 = 267

Total Points = 150 + 267 = 417

Each metric is calculated under the same methodology Points are totaled to determine allocation of 10% of total

funding Outcomes funding accounts for 4-years of institutional

data

Page 5: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

Points are calculated on 4 Factors

• 4-Year Institutions • Upper-Level Institutions

Above/Below Predicted Degrees

At-Risk Degrees

Undergraduate Critical Field Degrees

Total Undergraduate Degrees

• SAT or ACT below average• Pell Grant recipient • Part-time student • Initially enrolled at 20 or

older•High school equivalency certificate recipient in the last 6 years.

• STEM• Nursing• Allied Health

• Math and Science Teacher Certifications

• Baccalaureate•Associates of Applied Science

(AAS)

Page 6: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

Above/Below Predicted Degrees

Actual Grad Rate

minus

Predicted Grad Rate

equals

Difference

times

Cohort

equals

Above/Below Predicted

90%

minus

80%

equals

10%

times

2,000 Students

equals

200 Degrees Above

formula example

Page 7: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

Predicted Graduation RateMultiple regression model

Dependent Variable = 6-year Graduation Rate

Independent Variables - 4-Year InstitutionsPell Recipients Top 10 Percent high school graduates

Independent Variables - Upper-Level Institutions

Pell Recipients Credits Attempted in the last two years

Page 8: THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success

Predicted Graduation RateMultiple regression model

40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

f(x) = − 0.991212653778556 x + 0.969771528998241

6-Year Graduation Rate

Perc

ent P

ell R

ecip

ient

s