theatre nursing 6knic602 - king's college london · theatre nursing 6knic602 . level: 6 ......

24
Theatre Nursing 6KNIC602 Level: 6 Credits: 15 Module leader: Sheila Turner Tel: 020 7848 3217 Email: [email protected] Academic support is offered by the module leader. Please do not hesitate to discuss any aspect of the module with Sheila Turner. I am happy to help in any way I can. We are very much aware of the pressures of working, studying and/or family commitments and we have, therefore, provided academic support and guidance throughout the module. The use of learning agreements jointly developed between your practice supervisor and you will encourage self- reliance and self-direction. It will enable you to negotiate the pace and depth of your work and facilitate the integration of theory and practice. This handbook must be read in conjunction with module information provided on KEATS, the King’s E-Learning And Teaching Service. You will be given access to KEATS on enrolment. Important information relating to assessment and related regulations can be found in the Undergraduate Programme Handbook, available on KEATS and via the Student Services Centre. This handbook can also be provided in alternative formats (such as large print) upon request to [email protected]. 1

Upload: doankhue

Post on 01-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Theatre Nursing 6KNIC602 Level: 6

Credits: 15

Module leader: Sheila Turner

Tel: 020 7848 3217

Email: [email protected]

Academic support is offered by the module leader.

Please do not hesitate to discuss any aspect of the module with Sheila Turner. I am happy to help in any way I can. We are very much aware of the pressures of working, studying and/or family commitments and we have, therefore, provided academic support and guidance throughout the module. The use of learning agreements jointly developed between your practice supervisor and you will encourage self-reliance and self-direction. It will enable you to negotiate the pace and depth of your work and facilitate the integration of theory and practice. This handbook must be read in conjunction with module information provided on KEATS, the King’s E-Learning And Teaching Service. You will be given access to KEATS on enrolment. Important information relating to assessment and related regulations can be found in the Undergraduate Programme Handbook, available on KEATS and via the Student Services Centre. This handbook can also be provided in alternative formats (such as large print) upon request to [email protected].

1

Contents Module overview .......................................................................................................... 4

Module aim ............................................................................................................... 4

Learning outcomes ................................................................................................... 4

Practice outcomes ..................................................................................................... 5 Teaching arrangements ............................................................................................ 5

Submitting coursework ............................................................................................ 6

Assessment criteria ................................................................................................... 6

Formative Work ........................................................................................................ 7

Summary of essay (electronic) submission: ............................................................. 8

Reference List ........................................................................................................... 8 Submission date for coursework .............................................................................. 8

Results and re-submissions for coursework ............................................................ 9

Essay re-submission date ......................................................................................... 9

Resubmitted work available for download ............................................................... 9

PAD re-submission date ........................................................................................... 9

Learning resources ....................................................................................................... 10

Day 1 ............................................................................................................................. 10

Lecture 1: Introduction to the Module & Introduction to the Module Assignment . 10

Lecture 2: National and Local Priorities for Infection Control Practice .................. 10

Lecture 3: Diabetes and the Surgical Patient ........................................................... 10

Lecture 4: History of Surgery ................................................................................... 11

Group discussion: The Role of the Theatre (Perioperative) Nurse .......................... 11

Lecture 6: Ethics and the Theatre Nurse .................................................................. 12

Day 2............................................................................................................................. 13

Lecture 1: Laparoscopic Surgery .............................................................................. 13

Lecture 2: Focused Examples of Practice – WHO Surgical Safety Checklist ........... 13

Lectures 3, 4 & 5: Debate Preparation and Debate .................................................. 13 Lecture 6: Focused Examples of Practice – TBC ...................................................... 13

Day 3............................................................................................................................. 14

Lecture 1: Essay Preparation Seminar...................................................................... 14 Lecture 2: Gender Reassignment Surgery ................................................................ 14

Lecture 3: Surgical Anatomy – Thorax .................................................................... 14

Lecture 4: Major Incident Planning ......................................................................... 14

2

Day 4 ............................................................................................................................ 15

Lecture 1: Hepato-biliary Surgery ............................................................................ 15

Lecture 2: Introducing Robotic Surgery and the Role of the Theatre Nurse ........... 15

Lecture 3: Surgical Anatomy — Abdomen ............................................................... 15

Lecture 4: Module Evaluation and Completion ....................................................... 16

Indicative reading ..................................................................................................... 17

Module Management Team ......................................................................................... 22

Module evaluation .................................................................................................... 22

Action from previous evaluations ............................................................................. 22

Timetable .................................................................................................................. 23

3

Module overview While most frequently studied as a Free-standing module, this module can form part of the BSc Clinical Practice. The module contributes to your programme of study by offering an introduction to the contemporary theory relevant to the role of the nurse working in the operating theatre in the role of the ‘scrub nurse’, alongside an assessment of clinical practice and is most appropriate for nurses with proven experience within the environment.

The module can also be taken as a freestanding module.

Module aim

This module aims to prepare nurses proven knowledge and competence within the operating theatre setting working in the role of theatre (‘scrub’) nurse to:

• Debate the evidence supporting the nursing care of the patient undergoing surgery. • Critically analyse and evaluate the practice of theatre nursing. • Establish a basis of professional knowledge and competence in the nursing care of patients

undergoing surgery that promotes logical decision making in the planning and delivery of care.

• Promote the use of reflective practice in developing expertise in care delivery. • Review the evidence underpinning theatre nursing and evaluate implications for current and

future practice.

Learning outcomes At the end of the course participants will be able to effectively manage the assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation of holistic theatre (perioperative) nursing care. This will be indicated by the ability to:

• Critically examine the evidence-base and research-based literature • Utilise an approach to care that reflects the knowledge and skills required to deliver effective

communication with the patient/client/family and members of the health care team. • Contribute towards a culture in which diversity, with regards to both clients and colleagues,

is respected and equality is evident. • Critically review and judge the evolving role of the theatre nurse, particularly in relation to

the development of first and surgeon’s assistants. • Appraise the need to adopt approaches that will enhance perioperative practice and might

contribute towards service development. • Participate effectively in the nursing care and management of patients undergoing different

types of surgical procedure. • Evaluate the moral, legal, ethical and political implications of theatre nursing practice. • Debate the strategies that may be employed to ensure effective and careful resourcing, whilst

maintaining provision of top quality nursing care. • Analyse how competent leadership can facilitate positive and clear roles for professionals

within perioperative nursing practice. • Facilitate learning with clients, students and colleagues. • Appraise the knowledge and skills required for inter-professional collaboration in

perioperative care.

4

Practice outcomes Application of knowledge and skills to your clinical area and the development of critical thinking ability will be continuously assessed through completion of a clinical proficiency document (PAD). This specifies the competencies that need to be achieved to the identified standard by the date specified.

Teaching arrangements Teaching and learning in this course will be a dynamic process actively involving all practitioners. This reflects adult learning, with the aim of building upon your experience as a qualified practitioner. We will be utilising a variety of educational approaches to facilitate development of creative and analytical thinking, self-awareness, problem solving and decision making skills.

• Lectures and discussion • Practical sessions • Independent study • Seminars and tutorials • Directed reading

Sheila recognises that it is student participation and collaboration which enrich the taught component of any module. While you should not, specifically, share work you intend to submit for assessment; you could share references, for example, such that if one of you finds an article particularly useful, you could post the details for the rest of the group on your discussion board. During this module, your taught sessions are delivered between 09.00-17.00, the one-hour lunchbreak is flexible dependent upon your lecturers and the teaching venue. You are expected to devote your time to activities designed to further your understanding/improve your knowledge about theatre nursing. You are also expected to invest a similar amount of time (i.e. as a minimum 2-3 hours) weekly (4-6 hours over two weeks) upon your own reading/research about your specific role as a theatre nurse. During the majority of your study days, outside the taught the time is your own to use towards your education about perioperative patient care. However, one action learning set activity has been timetabled. Designed to make you think beyond what is delivered in the classroom, all these activities should help you to make the connection between the theory and the reality in practice of what happens to the patient undergoing surgery.

5

Submitting coursework For this module you are assessed by Sheila Turner.

Assessment criteria Title: Theatre nursing practice.

Word length: 2,000 words

Assessment Strategy The aim of this assignment is to allow you to integrate your knowledge from clinical experience with your assessment of proficiency in clinical practice (PAD document) and the theory which underpins nursing practice (references).

Rationale

The role of the nurse in theatre is diverse and involves great complexity with the need for quick thinking and manual dexterity. The responsibilities of the nurse in this role are wide-ranging, from the formation of an effective professional relationship with patients (where appropriate) and colleagues through to evaluation of the nursing care provided to the patient. The portfolio therefore provides an opportunity to consider the domains of this role in relation to the practice setting.

Guidelines

Proficiency document (submitted manually) It is a requirement of the course that you pass an assessment of clinical competence in a practice setting relevant to theatre nursing. Assessment of clinical practice is continuous throughout the course. Format: The assessment of clinical practice related to competencies identified for this module, Theatre Nursing, requires successful completion of a competency document. Mentor(s) must be identified in your clinical area. Your primary mentor must be an experienced nurse or ODP with a Mentorship qualification or equivalent (ENB 998 or C&G 730). An initial interview should take place within the first few weeks of the course. It is your responsibility to arrange this with identified Mentor(s). Your proficiency document must be reviewed by your module leader on 8 June (day 3) and this will be noted in your profile.

6

Written assignment submitted electronically

ESSAY TITLE: A critical exploration of the non-technical skills demonstrated by the Theatre Nurse

This essay must be based upon the module outcomes as published in this module handbook; consider which outcomes apply.

In preparing some initial thoughts and reading for the essay, consider these questions:

• A critical exploration’ requires that you adopt a critical approach to your reading and do not just accept what the sources you identify say.

• What are ‘non-technical skills’ and where did they originate? • Is there any difficulty in incorporating thinking devised in one industry into the provision of

healthcare? • Why are the ‘non-technical skills’ important to the theatre nurse role? • Notes from brainstorming Day 1:

You must support your writing with reference, using a critical approach, to relevant contemporaneous literature.

You must produce a comprehensive reference list which details (using the Harvard system) all the sources to which you refer in the essay.

The portfolio will comprise your PAD and essay

Formative Work You must submit your essay plan and reference list to Sheila at the beginning of Day Two (18h May), please submit your work to Sheila in the same format as you will present your summative, that is, please ensure your work has a margin, ideally ‘justify’ the paragraphs using font size 12, line spacing 1.5 – 2 (just as I have done here) and ensure that your name is on your work.

During Day Three (8th June) you must present your essay plan in a brief seminar with your peers.

So the two formative exercises form an opportunity for you to gain feedback about your essay plan and the references you have chosen to support your writing. In light of feedback given you will be able to make changes to your planned essay before summative submission.

Sheila will publish a list of dates and time for face-to-face tutorial for those individual students, who wish, to discuss formative feedback and preparation for summative assessment.

Summary of PAD (manual) submission: • The first page will be the post-registration cover sheet • The PAD must be included with this manual submission as the written component of your

portfolio

7

Summary of essay (electronic) submission:

Guidance for electronic assignment submission will be published on KEATS. Your submission must contain:

• A first page the post-registration cover sheet • The second page will be an introduction to your essay. • At the end of the essay your reference list will be submitted on a separate page (your cover

sheet, reference list and the PAD are not included in the 2000 word count but all other work is).

• The PAD must be submitted manually

Work must be within the word limit. The word limit specified in module handbooks is the maximum number of words permissible and any excess will not be read or marked. The work that comes within the word limit will be assessed according to the guidelines. Therefore, if important parts of the assignment fall outside the word limit you are likely to fail the assignment. Appendices must be used appropriately and essential information placed within the text. Appendices, reference lists, tables and figures are not included in the word count.

Reference List For guidance on referencing style please access college guidelines at the URL provided on your KEATS module homepage.

Please note that any issue regarded as unsafe practice will constitute an automatic fail. One copy of your assignment must be submitted. Coursework submission are provided on the KEATS module page. It is essential that you use your candidate number on all assignments/examinations. Your candidate number, which will begin with X for the academic year 2016/17, will be available via Student Records on the King’s Intranet approximately one month after you enrol. If you are unable to submit your work by the deadline please refer to the information in your programme handbook on “mitigating circumstances”. Submission date for coursework No later than 11.59 AM on Tuesday 18 July 2017

Late submissions will be accepted for 24 hours following the submission date. All work submitted late will be marked as normal but will be capped at the pass mark for the module. If your assignment is hard copy please ensure you date stamp it and submit it to the submission room G15 JCMB. If your assignment is submitted electronically through TurnItIn, information about how to submit late will be provided on KEATS module sites under assessment information. The external examiner for this module is TBC. Students are not to make direct contact with external examiners, in particular regarding their individual performance in assessments

8

Results and re-submissions for coursework Students will receive a provisional (unratified) mark for their coursework 4 weeks following submission. According to the method of submission as detailed on your KEATS site, if your work was submitted online you will be able to download marked coursework from KEATS; alternatively, if you completed a hard-copy submission you can collect your coursework and feedback from the Student Services Centre. To collect a hard copy assignment, you must provide your candidate number. Alternatively, you may send a stamped addressed envelope to the Student Services Centre ensuring that this is large enough to accommodate your assignments and that you have applied sufficient postage. Hard copy assignments will be retained for four weeks; if you have not collected your assignment by then, it will be destroyed. Feedback will include the award of a numerical grade which remains provisional until ratified by the examination boards. The dates for the examination boards are available on KEATS. Ratified marks can be viewed via Student Records on the King’s Intranet, the Monday following the relevant examination board. The marking criteria by which your work is judged are provided in full in your programme handbook. A marking Rubric is also published on the module KEATS site. Please also refer to the section in your programme handbook on plagiarism and how to avoid it. If you have a query about how to refer to a specific piece of work please ask your module leader, or a member of library staff for guidance. The feedback you receive on your assignment will guide you towards how to do better next time or how to maintain your existing high standard! If you do not understand your mark or the feedback you receive please contact Sheila Turner. If you are unsuccessful, it is recommended that you contact Sheila Turner before submitting your second attempt; this will enable Sheila to provide you with an appropriate level of support as you prepare to re-submit your work. Essay re-submission date Tuesday 17 October 2017

Resubmitted work available for download Tuesday 15 November 2017

Submission date for PAD No later than 11.59 AM on Tuesday 1 August 2017

PADs can be collected from the Student Services Centre room 3.15 James Clerk Maxwell Building (open 09.00-17.00 Monday-Friday) after 09.00 on Wednesday 9 September 2017. PAD re-submission date Tuesday 17 October 2017

9

Learning resources

Day 1 4 May 2017

Lecture 1: Introduction to the Module & Introduction to the Module Assignment Indicative reading Tame S.L. (2013) The effect of continuing professional education on perioperative nurses' relationships with medical staff: findings from a qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69(4), 617-627.

Lecture 2: National and Local Priorities for Infection Control Practice By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Identify the causes associated with cross-infection • Identify strategies to minimise • cross-infection • Describe the infective organisms of concern • Explain the difference between disinfection and sterilisation

Indicative reading Barrow C. (2009) A patient’s journey through the operating department from an infection control perspective. Journal of Perioperative Practice 19(3), 94-98.

Courtenay M. (1998) The teaching, learning and use of infection control knowledge in nursing. NT Research 3(2), 118-121.

Osborne S. (2003) Influences on compliance with standard precautions among operating room nurses. American Journal of Infection Control 31(7), 415-423.

Woodhead K., Taylor E.W., Bannister G., Chesworth T., Hoffman P. & Humphreys H. (2002) Behaviours and rituals in the operating theatre: A report from the hospital infection society working party on infection control in the operating theatres. Journal of Hospital Infection 51(4), 241-255.

Lecture 3: Diabetes and the Surgical Patient By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Identify the specific care needs of the patient with Diabetes Indicative reading Riddle M.C. (2004) Diabetes: too big and too bad to ignore any longer. Clinical Diabetes 22(2), 90-91.

Skeet J. (2004) Improving diabetes care through the NSF and GMS contract. Professional Nurse 19(8), 435-438.

10

Lecture 4: History of Surgery By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Appreciate the historical antecedents of contemporary medicine • Identify how surgical disorder/disease is diagnosed • Understand the principles of surgical treatment and the surgical process • Plan pre and postoperative nursing care for the surgical patient

Indicative reading Ellis H. (2002) The Cambridge Illustrated History of Surgery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Group discussion: The Role of the Theatre (Perioperative) Nurse By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Define the role of the nurse ‘scrubbing’ for a surgical procedure • Define the role of the nurse ‘circulating’ for a surgical procedure • Outline the optimum ‘scrub’ technique and length of time required to ‘scrub’ effectively.

Indicative reading Association for Perioperative Practice (2016) Standards and Recommendations for Safe Perioperative Practice. AfPP, Harrogate.

Bianchi E.R.F. (2008) Stress and Brazilian operating room nurses. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 3(3), 101-103.

Björn C. & Boström E.L. (2008) Theatre nurses’ understanding of their work: A phenomenographic study at a hospital theatre. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 3(4), 149-155.

Blomberg A.C., Bisholt B., Nilsson J. & Lindwall L. (2015) Making the invisible visible – operating theatre nurses’ perceptions of caring in perioperative practice. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Science 29(2), 361-368.

Korkiakangas T., Weldon S-M., Bezemer J. & Kneebone R. (2014) Nurse-surgeon object transfer: Video analysis of communication and situation awareness in the operating theatre. International Journal of Nursing Studies 51(9), 1195-1206.

Loe R. & Gould D. (2007) Disagreement and aggression in the operating theatre. Journal of Advanced Nursing 61(6), 609-618.

McCulloch P., Mishra A., Handa A., Dale T., Hirst G. & Catchpole K. (2009) The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Quality and Safety in Healthcare 18(2), 109-115.

McGarvey H., Chambers M. & Boore J. (2000) Development and definition of the role of the operating department nurse: a review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(5), 1092-1100.

Mitchell L. & Flynn R. (2008) Non-technical skills of the operating theatre scrub nurse: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 63(1), 15-24.

Mitchell L., Flynn R., Yule S., Mitchell J., Coutts K. & Youngson G. (2011) Thinking ahead of the surgeon. An interview study to identify scrub nurses’ non-technical skills. International Journal of Nursing Studies 48(7), 818-828.

11

Richardson-Tench M. (2008) The scrub nurse: basking in reflected glory. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 3(4). 125-131.

Rydenfält C., Johansson G., Larsson P.A., Åkerman K. & Odenrick P. (2011) Social structures in the operating theatre: how contradicting rationalities and trust affect work. Journal of Advanced Nursing 68(4), 783-795.

Timmons S. & Tanner J. (2005) Operating theatre nurses: Emotional labour and the hostess role. Internal Journal of Nursing Practice 11, 85-91.

Westerling K. & Bergom I. (2008) The importance of Nursing in Perioperative care: a patient’s perspective. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 3(4), 133-144.

Lecture 6: Ethics and the Theatre Nurse Indicative reading Allmark P. (2005) Can the Study of Ethics Enhance Nursing Practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing 51(6), 618-624.

Brooks A. & Hardley A. (2006) Nursing ethics in practice: issues for perioperative nursing. Journal of Perioperative Practice 16(3), 138, 140-143.

Marquis B.L. & Huston C.J. (2008) Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing: Theory and Application. 6th ed. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, London.

Thompson I.E., Melia K.M., Boyd K.M. & Horsburgh D. (2006) Nursing Ethics. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone, London.

Directed study: Write up notes from today’s sessions; add in material from your reading about the topics. Read all session materials available via KEATS in preparation for next week. Assignment activity: Begin research and reading for the essay. Prepare an essay plan and reference list for submission to Sheila on day 2 and for seminar presentation on day 3.

12

Day 2 18 May 2017 FORMATIVE SUBMISSION

Lecture 1: Laparoscopic Surgery By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Identify the role of the nurse in relation to laparoscopic procedures • Identify the risks and benefits of laparoscopic surgery.

Lecture 2: Focused Examples of Practice – WHO Surgical Safety Checklist By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Discuss the implementation of processes designed to ensure patient safety. Indicative reading Pickering S.P., Robertson E.R., Griffin D., Hadi M., Morgan L.J., Catchpole K.C., New S., Collins G. & McCulloch P. (2013) Compliance and use of the World Health Organisation checklist in UK operating theatres. British Journal of Surgery 100(12), 1664-1670.

Lectures 3, 4 & 5: Debate Preparation and Debate

Lecture 6: Focused Examples of Practice – TBC By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Discuss contemporary approaches and their implications for patient care. Directed study: Write up notes from today’s sessions; add in material from your reading about the topics. Read all session materials available via KEATS in preparation for next week. Assignment activity: Following the review of and feedback about your essay plan and reference list refine what you wish to present about your essay in seminar on Day 3 to your module colleagues.

13

Day 3 8 June 2017 PAD review, please give your PAD to Sheila as you come in, it will be returned at the end of the day

Lecture 1: Essay Preparation Seminar

Lecture 2: Gender Reassignment Surgery By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Identify the role of the nurse in relation to gender reassignment surgery • Identify the risks and benefits of gender reassignment surgery.

Lecture 3: Surgical Anatomy – Thorax By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Describe the anatomy of the thorax • Consider the implications of altered anatomy for surgical procedures.

Indicative reading Marieb E.N. & Hoehn K.N. (2010) Human Anatomy and Physiology. 8th ed. Benjamin/Cummings, London.

Rastishauser S. (1994) Physiology & Anatomy - A Basis for Nursing and Health Care. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

Lecture 4: Major Incident Planning Please bring a copy of your local major incident policy as the basis of group discussion. By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Outline the minimum requirements of a major incident policy • Identify the role of the theatre nurse-in-charge during a major incident

Directed study: Write up notes from today’s sessions; add in material from your reading about the topics. Assignment activity: use the notes you made about the feedback gained during your assignment seminar to polish your essay plan and to develop/extend your reading. If you have a tutorial booked for day 4 send one page of your essay to Sheila by e-mail 48 hours before your tutorial (so that she has time to read and annotate your work), this means the tutorial will become a discussion about your work. Do not bring part of your essay on the day of the tutorial, this will not offer best use of the opportunity available to you because Sheila will spend most of your tutorial time reading, rather than discussing your work with you.

14

Day 4 22 June 2017

Lecture 1: Hepato-biliary Surgery By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Define ‘hepato-biliary surgery’ • Explain the nurse role during hepato-biliary surgery

Indicative reading The King’s College Hospital patient resources made a good start. They can be accessed at: https://www.kch.nhs.uk/service/a-z/hepatobiliary-pancreatic (last accessed 5 April 2017).

Lecture 2: Introducing Robotic Surgery and the Role of the Theatre Nurse By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Define ‘robotic surgery’ • Identify the procedures which might be robotically assisted • Explain the nurse role during robotic surgery.

Indicative reading Francis P. (2006) The evolution of robotics in surgery and implementing a perioperative robotics nurse specialist role. AORN Journal 83 (3), 629-632, 634-642, 644-646, and 649-650.

Herron D.M. & Marohn M. (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 22, 313-325.

Sarlos D., Kots L., Stevanovic N. & Schaer G. (2010) Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case–control study. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 150(1), 92-96.

Lecture 3: Surgical Anatomy — Abdomen By the end of the session students will be able to:

• Describe the anatomy of the head and neck • Consider the implications of altered anatomy for surgery.

Indicative reading Marieb E.N. & Hoehn K.N. (2010) Human Anatomy and Physiology. 8th ed. Benjamin/Cummings, Redwood City.

15

Lecture 4: Module Evaluation and Completion Directed study: Write up notes from today’s sessions; add in material from your reading about the topics. Assignment activity: prepare your thoughts/notes for tutorial with Sheila (you will need to make an appointment for a small group tutorial). If you wish to discuss your written work at tutorial you should send one page of your essay to Sheila by e-mail (using ONLY your KCL e-mail) three days before your tutorial (so that she has time to read and annotate your work), this means the tutorial will become a discussion about your work. Do not bring part of your essay on the day of the tutorial, this will not offer best use of the opportunity available to you because Sheila will spend most of your tutorial time reading, rather than discussing your work with you. Alternatively you could have an e-tutorial (or a Skype™ discussion about your work). You must send the 250-word draft as a WORD attachment to an e-mail stating in your message that you want an e-tutorial. If you request an e-tutorial Sheila will return your work as speedily as she can, if it is likely to take more than 48 hours to return your work Sheila will let you know. If you state in your e-mail that you would like a Skype™ tutorial you also need to identify some dates when you will be available to discuss your work. Please note it is not possible for Sheila to review written work with less than 7 days to go to the submission date.

16

Indicative reading Allard J., Bleakly A., Hobbs A. & Coombes L. (2011) Pre-surgery briefings and safety climate in the operating theatre. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(8), 711-717.

Association for Perioperative Practice, 2016. Standards and Recommendations for Safe Perioperative Practice. 4th ed. Association for Perioperative Practice: Harrogate

Ball K.A. (2009) Do-not-resuscitate orders in surgery: decreasing the confusion. AORN Journal 89(1), 140-150.

Barker M. (1996) Should there be a nursing presence in the operating theatre? British Journal of Nursing 5(18), 1134-37. Bernier M.J., Sanares D.C., Owen S.V. & Newhouse P.L. (2003) Preoperative Teaching Received and Valued in a Day Surgery Setting. AORN Journal 77(3), 563-582. Bethune R., Govindarajulu S., Sahu A., Cawthorn S. & Pullyblank A. (2011)Use of briefings and debriefings as a tool in improving team work, efficiency, and communication in the operating theatre Post graduate British Medical journal, 87, 331-334.

Braddock C., Hudak P.L., Feldman J.J., Bereknyei S., Frankel R.M. & Levinson W. (2008) “Surgery Is Certainly One Good Option”: Quality and Time-Efficiency of Informed Decision-Making in Surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery America. 90, 1830-1838. Brigden R. (1997) Operating Theatre Technique. 6th ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. Brunges M., Avigne G. & Wasik M. (2006) Health Promotion in the Operating Room: A Quality Improvement Project. AORN Journal 83(1), 171-177. Bull R. & Fitzgerald M. (2006) Nursing in a technological environment: Nursing care in the operating room. International Journal of Nursing Practice 12(1), 3-7. Chard R. (2010) How Perioperative Nurses Define, Attribute Causes of, and React to Intraoperative Errors. AORN Journal 91(1), 132-146. Clancy J., McVicar A.J. & Baird N. (2002) Perioperative Practice: Fundamentals of Homeostasis. Edward Arnold, London. Cox H. & Cox D. (2000) Hospitals without walls: A journey through the health-care system. International Journal of Nursing Practice 6, 105-109. Cummins T. (2009) Migrant nurses perceptions and attitudes of integration into the perioperative setting. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(8), 1611-1616.

Dimond B. (2015) Legal Aspects of Nursing. 7th ed. Pearson, London. DOH (2004) Facilities for Surgical Procedures: Volume 1. Health Building Note 26 Norwich: The Stationery Office. DOH (2007). Heating and Ventilation Systems Health Technical Memorandum 03-01 Specialised ventilation for healthcare premises Part A: Design and validation. Norwich: The Stationery Office. DOH (2010) Essence of Care. DH, London. Evans J. & Lipp A. (2009) Health Economics: what value to the theatre practitioner? Journal of Perioperative Practice 19(3), 88-92.

17

Farrell G.A (2002) From tall poppies to squashed weeds*: why don’t nurses pull together more? Journal of Advanced Nursing 35(1), 26-33. Flin R.H., Yule S., McKenzie L. & Paterson-Brown S. & Maran N. (2006) Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. The Surgeon, 4(3), 145-51.

Flin R.H., O’Connor P. & Crichton M. (2008) Safety at the Sharp End; a guide to non-technical skills. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd In World Health Organisation, 2009. Patient Safety Curriculum Guide for Medical Schools, Topic 4: Being an effective team player. [Online] Available at: www.who.int/patientsafety/education/curriculum/who_mc_topic-4.pdf [Last accessed 5 April 2017].

Francis P. & Winfield H.N. (2006) Medical Robotics: The Impact on Perioperative Nursing Practice. Urologic Nursing 26(2). 99-108.

Fuller J.K. (2013) Surgical Technology: Principles and Practice. 6th ed. Elsevier, London.

Gardezi F., Lingard L., Espin S., Whyte S., Orser B. & Baker G.R. (2009) Silence, power and communication in the operating room. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(7), 1390-1399.

Gawande A.A., Zinner M.J., Studdert D.M. & Brennan T.A.( 2003)Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals, Surgery, 133, 614-21.

Gillespie & Hamlin (2009) A Synthesis of the Literature on ‘Competence’ as It Applies to Perioperative Nursing. AORN Journal 90(2), 245-252, 254-258.

Hood P.A., Tarling M. & Turner S (2011) AfPP In your Pocket, Perioperative Practice. Association for Perioperative Practice and Synergy, Harrogate.

Hughes S. & Mardell A. (2009) (Editors) Oxford Handbook of Perioperative Practice. OUP, Oxford. Joels C. & Newbold D. (2007) Crew resource Management: making perioperative care safety a self-fulfilling prophecy. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 3(2), 59-64. Leinonen T., Leino-Kilpi H., Ståhlberg M.R. & Lertola K. (2002) The quality of perioperative care: perceptions of nursing staff. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 1(1), 5-12. Lindawall L. & Post von I. (2009) Habits in perioperative care nursing culture, Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 4(1), 19-26.

Lindgren M., Unosson M. & Krantz A.M. (2005) Pressure ulcer risk factors in patients undergoing surgery. Journal of Advanced Nursing 52(3), 271-280. Lingard L., Espin S., Whyte S., Regehr G., Baker G.R., Reznick R., Bohnen J., Orser B., Doran D. & Grober E. (2004) Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality Safety Health Care, 13, 330-34.

Loveday H.P., Wilson J.A., Pratt R.J., Golsorkhi M., Tingle A., Bak A., Browne J., Prieto J. & Wilcox M. (2014) epic 3: National Evidence-Based Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections in NHS Hospitals in England. Journal of Hospital Infection 86 (supp1): S1-S70. Lucas A.D., Chobin N., Conner R., Gordon E., Mitchell S., Perry B. & Stratmeyer M. (2009) Steam Sterilisation and Internal Count sheets: Assessing the Potential for Cytotoxicity. AORN 89(3), 521-531.

18

Mencia H. (2008) The implementation of the role of Modern Matron in the operating department. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 3(3), 107-114. Meurier C.E., Vincent C.A. & Parmar D.G. (1997). Learning from errors in nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(1), 111-119. Milligan F. & Dennis S. (2005) Building a safety culture. Nursing Standard 20(11), 48-52. Mitchell L. & Flin R.H. (2008) Non-technical skills of the operating theatre scrub nurse: literature review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(1), 15-24.

Mordiffi S.Z., Tan S.P. & Wong M.K. (2003) Information Provided to Surgical Patients Versus Information Needed. AORN Journal 77(3), 546-562. National Patient Safety Agency (2009) WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (adapted for England and Wales) Available from: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/EasySiteWeb/getresource.axd?AssetID=61388 (Last accessed 5 April 2017).

Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2010) Raising and escalating concerns, Guidance for nurses and midwives. NMC, London. Patel K.A. & Thomas W.E.G. (2008) Sutures, ligatures and staples, Surgery 26(2), 48-53. Philips N. (2016) Berry and Kohn’s Operating Room Technique, 13th ed. Mosby, London. Pirie S. (2005) Surgical scrub practice and solutions. British Journal of Perioperative Nursing 15(3), 105-107. Rejeh N., Ahmadi F., Mohammadi E., Kazemnejad A. & Anoosheh M. (2009) Nurses experiences and perceptions of influencing barriers to postoperative pain management. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 23(2), 274-281.

Riley R., Manias E. & Polglase A. (2006) Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety. Quality and Safety in Healthcare 15(5), 369-374. Riley R. & Manias E. (2002) Foucault could have been an operating room nurse. Journal of Advanced Nursing 39(4), 316-324. Rudolfsson G., Ringsberg K. & Post Von I. (2003) A source of strength - nurses’ perspectives of the perioperative dialogue. Journal of Nursing Management 11(4), 250-257. Rudolfsson G., van Post I. & Eriksson K. (2007) The Perioperative Dialogue: Holistic Nursing in Practice. Holistic Nursing Practice 21(6), 292-298.

Sandars J. & Cook G. (2007) ABC of Patient Safety. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.

Schlack W.S. & Boermeester M.A (2010) Patient safety during anaesthesia: incorporation of the WHO safe surgery guidelines into clinical practice. Current Opinion Anaesthesiology, 23, 754-758.

Schroeter K. (2000) Advocacy in Perioperative Nursing Practice. AORN Journal 71(6), 1207-1222. Silén-Lipponen M., Tossavainen K., Turunen H. & Smith A. (2005). Potential errors and their prevention in operating room teamwork as experienced by Finnish, British and American nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 11(1), 21-32.

19

Tanner J., Khan O., Walsh S., Chernova J., Lamont S. & Laurent T. (2008) Brushes and picks used on nails during the surgical scrub to reduce bacteria: a randomised trial. Journal of Hospital Infection. 71, 234-238.

Timmons S. & Tanner J. (2006) Operating theatre nurses: Emotional labour and the hostess role. International Journal of Nursing Practice 11(2), 85-91.

Tse K.Y. & So K.W. (2008) Nurses’ perceptions of preoperative teaching for ambulatory surgical patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing 63(6), 619-625.

Undre S., Sevdalis N., Healey A.N., Darzi A. & Vincent C.A. (2006)Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(2), 182-89.

van Beuzekom M. & Boer F. (2006) A Comparison of US, UK, and Dutch Perioperative Staffing Practices. AORN Journal 84(4), 632, 634-636, 638-641.

Vincent C. (2006) Patient Safety. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, London.

Watson D.S. (2007) The Multidimensional Role of the Perioperative Nurse Practitioner. Perioperative Nursing Clinics 2, 19-21.

Wennstrom B., Lillemor R.M. & Bergh I. (2008) Use of perioperative dialogues with children undergoing day surgery. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1), 96-106.

Wicker P. & O’Neill J. (2010) (Editors) Caring for the Perioperative Patient. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.

Williams M. (2002) Quality in operating theatre nursing: a phenomenological research study. Journal of Perioperative Care 1(2), 47-56.

Woodhead K. & Fudge L. (2012) Manual of Perioperative Care: An Essential Guide. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.

World Health Organization, (2007) WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual. [Online] Available from: www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/ss_checklist/en/ (Last accessed 5 April 2017).

World Health Organization, (2008) Safe Surgery Saves Lives: The Second Global Patient Safety Challenge - Surgical Safety Checklist. [Online] Available from: www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/ (Last accessed 5 April 2017).

World Health Organisation (2009) World Health Alliance for Patient Safety Implementation Manual Checklist, Geneva: WHO.

20

Electronic materials Lasers: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1120837-overview (Last accessed 6 April 2017) You are also advised to explore the Cochrane Database www.thecochranelibrary.com, which features research reviews summarizing the findings of peer-reviewed research.

Journals: Anaesthesia

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine

AORN Journal

British Journal of Anaesthesia

British Journal of Perioperative Nursing

Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care

Recent Advances in anaesthesia and analgesia

Seminars in Perioperative Nursing

Surgery

Websites: www.afpp.org.uk

www.doh.gov.uk

www.fleshandbones.com

www.gasnet.med.yale.edu/

www.kcl.ac.uk/nmvc

www.nmc-uk.org

www.resus.org.uk

21

Module Management Team The team is made up of management representatives from all employers supporting students on the module, the teaching team and representatives of FNSNM management and student representatives. Team meetings occur on three occasions per academic year; usually timed to coincide with results publication.

Module evaluationAt the end of the module you are requested to complete the short online evaluation which will be available on your module KEATS site. Student evaluations are very important to us and are required by Health Education England and the regional London Local Education and Training Boards.

Action from previous evaluations Student feedback is very important and, where necessary sessions and the approach to assessment have been remodeled in accordance with that feedback and the input of the CMT. Evaluations are always reviewed at Module Management Team meetings. As a result of the last evaluation the assessment for the module has been changed; student and manager feedback about module delivery is always reported internally within FNSNM.

22

Timetable

6KNIC602 Theatre Nursing Term 3 2016/7 Days 1 & 2

Teaching mode Date Type of

session Title Time Room Lecturer

Online learning activities: Review ‘preparing for exams and assessments’ and begin on-line materials, review materials for day 1; all of these are available via module KEATS page.

Review additional dates for taught study skills sessions (these might not coincide with your study days) in the programme handbook and arrange the time to attend.

University based study

4 May 2017

Lecture

Introduction to the module & the module assignment 09:00

FWB 1.20

Sheila Turner Infection control 10:30 Maria Osman Focused example of practice- care of the patient with Diabetes 12:30 Dr Henri Mulnier

History of surgery 14:30

Sheila Turner Group discussion

The role of the theatre nurse 15:30

Lecture Introducing Ethics 16:15

Directed study activities: Prepare an essay plan and initial reference list for submission to Sheila Turner on 18 May 2017. Online learning activities: continue on-line activities, review materials for day 2.

University based study

18 May 2017

Lecture

Laparoscopic surgery-confirmed 09:00 FWB 1.20

Rose Roy-MacAuley WHO surgical safety checklist 11:00

Sheila Turner Debate preparation 12.00

Library time to prepare for the debate Debate 14.30

FWB 1.20 Sheila Turner

Lecture Focused example of practice - TBC 15.45 TBC

23

Directed study activities: Revise essay plan, expand reference list for an in-class session on 8 June. Also please acquire a copy of your local major incident policy as the basis of group discussion on day 3. Online learning activities: Complete online activities, review materials for day 3.

University based study

8 June 2017

Seminar In-class assignment preparation exercise 09:00 FWB 1.20

Sheila Turner

Lecture

Gender reassignment surgery 11.00 Joana Oliveira Rosa

Anatomy Human Tissue Authority Licensing Number 12123. Please note that expectant mothers, photography, mobile phones, eating, drinking, smoking and the wearing of contact lenses are not permitted in the Dissecting Room for legal and health and safety reasons. All course attendees must comply with Human Tissue Act regulations. Dissecting Room staff reserve the right to refuse admission to anyone not adhering to these regulations.

14:30 Anatomy labs, Hodgkin building, Guy’s campus

Professor Ellis

Major incident planning 15:45 Hodgkin CRM 7 Sheila Turner Directed study activities: Revise essay plan and expand references following formative in-class exercise. Arrange a small group essay tutorial with Sheila Turner. Online-based study: review Day 4 materials provided on KEATS

University based study

22 June 2017 Lecture

Focused example of practice-Hepatobiliary surgery 09:00

FWB G72

Amparo Piquer Altarriba

Focused example of practice TBC 11:00 TBC

Anatomy Human Tissue Authority Licensing Number 12123. Please note that expectant mothers, photography, mobile phones, eating, drinking, smoking and the wearing of contact lenses are not permitted in the Dissecting Room for legal and health and safety reasons. All course attendees must comply with Human Tissue Act regulations. Dissecting Room staff reserve the right to refuse admission to anyone not adhering to these regulations.

14:30 Anatomy labs, Hodgkin building, Guy’s campus

Professor Ellis

Module completion and evaluation 15.45 Hodgkin CRM 7 Sheila Turner Directed study activities: Continue preparing essay, if necessary, make an appointment for a small group essay tutorial with Sheila Turner. Online-based study: review essay preparation and submission materials provided on KEATS and use the Faculty plagiarism module to practice assignment submission.

N.B The Hodgkin building is on the Guy’s campus, maps/directions will be provided. FWB – Franklin-Wilkins Building; Waterloo campus.

24