the workplace eff ec ve - wordpress.com · 2015-01-25 · case study 1 designed by clive wilkinson...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: the workplace eff ec ve - WordPress.com · 2015-01-25 · CASE STUDY 1 designed by CLIVE WILKINSON architects New genera on internet adver sing agency New York City, NY 125-175 employees;](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f028c267e708231d404ce82/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Privacy enriches collabora on by allowing individuals and small groups me to think & recharge
workplacetheeff ec vePRIVACY
ECOSYSTEM OF SPACES
People choose where and how the work gets done
Seamless transi ons from one space to another = minimal worfl ow interrup on
People can move between group me and individual me; coming together to problem-solve and then
going away to let ideas gestate
Need-based alloca on and movement through space, as opposed to hierarchy-based
group in enclosed area
Why?
Visual Acous cControlDistrac ons
Ability toFocus A en on
INFORMATION STIMULATIONcontrol control
Controlleda en on
S mulus-drivena en on
Rejuvena on
CHANCE ENCOUNTERS
BUST SILOS by driving traffi c to shared spaces and crossing paths to create “collisions”
Informal interac ons = trust is strengthened and knowledge is more likely to be shared across professions
Amy Alonso | Grad II, Spring 2015
Why?
Why?
12
3
(for rou ne tasks)
group in open area
individual in enclosed area
individual in open area
shared spaces
crossing paths
(Balancing “We” & “Me”, HoK Top 10 Trends Infl uencing Workplace Design)
(Balancing “We” & “Me”, The Transparency Trap,Workplace Design Trends: Make Way for the Millenials, HoK Top 10 Trends Infl uencing Workplace Design, How Culture Shapes the Workplace)
(Who Moved My Cube?, Workspaces That Move People)
![Page 2: the workplace eff ec ve - WordPress.com · 2015-01-25 · CASE STUDY 1 designed by CLIVE WILKINSON architects New genera on internet adver sing agency New York City, NY 125-175 employees;](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f028c267e708231d404ce82/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CASE STUDY 1
designed by CLIVE WILKINSON architectsNew genera on internet adver sing agencyNew York City, NY125-175 employees; 23,000 SFYear designed: 2014Needs: Collabora on, transparency, easily accessible places to meetDesign concept: One, con nuous surface that unites all employeesAB
OUT
“Endless desk” creates one con nuous, seamless surface, & unites and centers a community of employees; allows for individual and group work to be done
in an open area
Archways provide a place of escape (rejuvena on) or foster tasks that need
controlled a en on
Every department fl ows into another; removes silos and
creates collisions as one moves around the offi ce
Ra o of conference room seats to individual work seat is 52:124;
this means employees have immediate op ons to move to enclosed areas;
at least 6 diff erent se ngs can be used for mul ple types of work
“Phone Booth” rooms allow for complete acous c control
Employees can seamlessly transi on
from one type of space to another
++
![Page 3: the workplace eff ec ve - WordPress.com · 2015-01-25 · CASE STUDY 1 designed by CLIVE WILKINSON architects New genera on internet adver sing agency New York City, NY 125-175 employees;](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f028c267e708231d404ce82/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Archways create “gro os” to accommodate mee ngs or private/focused workspace; conference rooms provide more s mula on control when archways aren’t enough
Easily accessible places to meet for impromptu interac ons, or to carry out rou ne tasks that only require s mulus-driven a en on
Cafeteria area is immediately adjacent and serves as a collision zone - more interac on
Subtle divisions within the space facilitate more casual interac on
Archway “gro os” provide a small degree of informa on control, as well as moderate s mula on control
![Page 4: the workplace eff ec ve - WordPress.com · 2015-01-25 · CASE STUDY 1 designed by CLIVE WILKINSON architects New genera on internet adver sing agency New York City, NY 125-175 employees;](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f028c267e708231d404ce82/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CASE STUDY
designed by Jean De LessardCanada-wide public rela ons agency specializing in lifestyleMontreal, QC, Canada35 employees; 4,500 SFYear designed: 2014Needs: A collabora ve, energized environmentResul ng Concept: “Stylized, o eat village”. using the small house as inspira onAB
OUT
Loca on of casual areas in rela on to open mee ng spaces or enclosed
mee ng spaces allow seamless transi on from one space to another without
interrup on; employees have several workspace varia ons to choose from,
depending upon ac vity and privacy needs
“Houses” help defi ne work zones, provide somewhat enclosed
areas for individual or group work, and off er visual privacy, as well as oppoortuni es to control distrac ons and focus a en on
Casual open areas invite casual interac ons (chance encounters), and allow employees
to carry out rou ne tasks and employ s mulus-driven a en on
Lacking in quan ty are more “escape” areas for individuals who
need private me for Controlled A en on or Rejuvena on
Ra o of conference room seats to individual work seat is 18:32; with at
least 6 diff erent se ngs can be used for mul ple types of work
2
Break rooms serve as natural collision zones
+
+ + +
1
4
3
2
![Page 5: the workplace eff ec ve - WordPress.com · 2015-01-25 · CASE STUDY 1 designed by CLIVE WILKINSON architects New genera on internet adver sing agency New York City, NY 125-175 employees;](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f028c267e708231d404ce82/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Pods have their own iden ty (fake grass, wood paneling, orange dots), and provide a so fascina on for users
Conference rooms provide visual and acous c control for groups, as well as the ability to control s mula on by minimizing distrac ons and maximizing ability to focus a en on
Individual work places are off ered within the house-like pods, which can either be1) individual enclosed areas,2) individual open areas, or3) group enclosed areas depending on their u liza on
Individual work can be done in an open area, but remote enough to work with focused concentra on; the design lacks enough op ons for individual work in enclosed areas
Layout allows for seamless transi on from one type of space to another
House-like pods can off er acous c privacy (house in foreground), or both visual and acous c privacy (house in background)
(Refer to plan on previous page for orienta on)
1
1
2
2
3
4
3 4
+ +
+