the weai tool and feed the future ethiopia findings
TRANSCRIPT
The WEAI Tool and Feed the Future Ethiopia Findings
Hazel Malapit, IFPRI / PHNFanaye Tadesse, IFPRI / ESSP
Gender and Agriculture: Reviewing the evidence and the way forwardGetfam Hotel, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 17 June 2016
Purpose of the WEAI
• Design, develop, and test an index to measure the greater inclusion of women in agricultural sector growth that has occurred as a result of US Government intervention under the Feed the Future (FTF) Initiative
3
Measuring Women’s Empowerment: Challenges and Opportunities
• Defining empowerment: “expanding people’s ability to make strategic life choices, particularly in contexts in which this ability had been denied to them” (Kabeer 1999)
• Challenges: empowerment is personal, context-specific, therefore difficult to measure
• But: what’s measured matters: if we measure, we can monitor, and use it as a benchmark for progress
4
5
Methodological foundations and innovations• Key aspect of index construction: similar to family of multi-
dimensional poverty indices (Alkire and Foster 2011, J of Public Econ) and the Foster-Greere-Thorbeck (FGT) poverty indices
• Innovative because it uses interviews of the primary male and primary female adults in the same household
• Focus is strictly on empowerment in agriculture, distinct from economic status, education, and empowerment in other domains
• Details on index construction in Alkire et al. (2013), World Development
How is the Index constructed?
Five domains of empowerment
(5DE)A direct measure of
women’s empowerment in 5
dimensions
Gender parity Index (GPI)
Women’s achievements relative to the primary male
in hh
Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture
Index(WEAI)
WEAI is made up of two sub indices
All range from zero to one; higher values = greater empowerment
90 % 10 %
6
The 5DE• Production: decisions about agricultural production, including sole or joint
decisionmaking power over food or cash-crop farming, livestock, and fisheries, as well as autonomy in agricultural production
• Resources: access to and decisionmaking power over productive resources, including ownership of, access to, and decisionmaking power over productive resources such as land, livestock, agricultural equipment, consumer durables, and credit
• Income: sole or joint control over income and expenditures • Leadership: Leadership in the community, including membership in economic
or social groups and being comfortable with speaking in public • Time: allocation of time to productive and domestic tasks and satisfaction with
the time available for leisure activities
7
Five
dom
ains
of e
mpo
wer
men
tA woman’s empowerment score shows her own achievements
8
Who is empowered?
A woman who has achieved ‘adequacy’ in 80% or more of the weighted indicators is empowered
9
Q: Is Lilian Empowered/Disempowered?
A: Lilian is Empowered
Q: Is Seema Empowered/Disempowered?
A: Seema is Disempowered
Gender Parity Index (GPI)Reflects two things:1. The percentage of women who enjoy gender parity. A woman
enjoys gender parity if – she is empowered or – her empowerment score is equal to or greater than the
empowerment score of the primary male in her household. 2. The empowerment gap - the average percentage shortfall that a
woman without parity experiences relative to the male in her household.
The GPI adapts the FGT Poverty Gap measure to reflect gender parity.
14
How is WEAI used? 1. As a monitoring indicator for FTF to evaluate whether
programs are having intended effect on women's empowerment
2. As a diagnostic tool to help identify areas in which women and men are disempowered, so that programs and policies can be targeted to those areas
3. Impact evaluations, testing new indicators/assessing validity in different contexts, etc.
15
Impact of WEAI worldwide
5 = FTF countries only15 = other organizations only13 = both FTF countries & other organizations
62 known cases of WEAI adoption (including IFAD & FAO)
WB will collect A-WEAI in future waves of Malawi LSMS-ISA
WEAI : Ethiopia Result
Data
• Data from a baseline and survey conducted for the evaluation of the FtF program in Ethiopia, the US government global hunger and food security initiative.
• Collected from 5 regions of the country and comprises of 7,056 households from 84 woredas (districts).
• Data collection took place in June 2013 and 2015. • The questionnaire used for the survey includes modules on
• basic demographic information; household consumption expenditure; Women empowerment indicators; women dietary diversity and anthropometry; child anthropometry and infant and young child feeding; employment, agricultural productivity and input use; and other relevant information.
• The data is representative at FTF zone of influence.
18
Feed the Future in Ethiopia
19
Women Empowerment in Agricultural Index results.
IndicesSurvey Midline Vs.
baselineBaseline Interim
78.1% 73.3% -6.2%
41.0% 39.2% -4.4%
Disempowerment Index 0.321 0.288 -10.3%
5DE Index 0.676 0.711 5.2%
% of women with no gender parity 56.0% 53.3% -4.8%
% of women with gender parity 44.0% 46.7% 6.1%
Average Empowerment Gap 23.5% 22.9% -2.6%
GPI 0.869 0.878 1.0%
WEAI 0.698 0.729 4.4%
WEAI : Result
20
Contribution of each of the 5 domains to disempowerment of women
15.1%
12.7%
17.6%
16.8%
7.3%
14.1%
2.7%2.1%
7.9%
3.7%
Input in Productive DecisionsAutonomy in ProductionOwnership of AssetsPurchase, Sale or Transfer of AssetAccess to and De-cisions on CreditControl Over use of IncomeGroup MembershipSpeaking in PublicWorkloadLeisure
21
Contribution of the 10 sub-domains to the disempowerment of women
Domain Sub-domain Baseline InterimProduction
Input in productive decisions 3.5% 3.7% Autonomy in production 7.4% 7.9%Resources
Ownership of assets 4.8% 2.1%
Purchase, sale or transfer of assets 5.4% 2.7%
Access to and decisions on credit 15.1% 14.1%
Income Control over use of income 6.5% 7.3%Leadership
Group membership 15.4% 16.8%Speaking in public 14.4% 17.6%
Time Workload 13.5% 12.7%
Leisure 14.1% 15.1%
22
Result: Proportion of disempowered women by the sub-domains (Interim survey)
Input i
n Producti
ve Decis
ions
Autonom
y in Pro
duction
Ownership
of Ass
ets
Purchase
, Sale or T
ransfe
r of A
sset
Access
to and D
ecisions o
n Credit
Control O
ver use
of Inco
me
Group M
embers
hip
Speaking in
Public
Work
load
Leisure
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
23
Contribution of each domain to disempowerment of women
WEAI : Result
24
Baseline Midline
Female Male Female Male
Disempowered Headcount 78.1% 59.3% 73.3% 46.5%
Average Inadequacy Score 41.0% 35.0% 39.2% 34.4%
Disempowerment Index 0.321 0.208 0.288 0.16
5DE Index 0.679 0.792 0.712 0.84
% of women with no gender parity 56.0% 53.3%
Average Empowerment Gap 23.5% 22.9%
GPI 0.869 0.878
WEAI 0.698 0.729
Women Empowerment in Agricultural Index (comparison between men and
female)
25
Contribution of each of the 5 domains to disempowerment of men
Women
26
Result: Proportion of Disempowered Men and Women (Interim survey)
Input i
n Producti
ve Decis
ions
Autonom
y in Pro
duction
Ownership
of Ass
ets
Purchase
, Sale or T
ransfe
r of A
sset
Access
to and D
ecisions o
n Credit
Control O
ver use
of Inco
me
Group M
embers
hip
Speaking in
Public
Work
load
Leisure
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Women Men
27
Conclusion
• Overall empowerment of women based on the WEAI shows some level of improvement.
• Percentage of women who are disempowered in the 5 domains has declined.
• Percentage of women who are adequate in the ten indicators has increased except in speaking in public indicator (declined) and leisure (remained the same).
• The percentage of women who are disempowered in the resource domain has declined
• Major contributors to disempowerment of women in both rounds are leadership and time domains.
• Similar contributors to the disempowerment of both women and men
28
Gender Integration and Empowerment in
Agriculture
29
Interventions to address gender gaps at scale:• Women’s Agribusiness Leadership Network created a sustainable network of
over 500 women entrepreneurs and their mentees in four regions. Over 78,000 women joined farmer cooperative unions as a result.
• 250 women Transitioning Out of Pastoralism (TOPs) and 167 in the dairy sector were trained on business skills and entrepreneurship.
WEAI Analysis:• Leadership and time
domains are the largest contributors to the disempowerment for women which might contribute to the limited access to trainings and technology application compared to men.
Bangladesh’s Experience with the WEAI and Lessons for Ethiopia
Hazel Malapit, IFPRI / PHNFanaye Tadesse, IFPRI / ESSP
Gender and Agriculture: Reviewing the evidence and the way forwardGetfam Hotel, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 17 June 2016
31
What’s special about Bangladesh?
• First FTF country to collect the WEAI– Pilot country (with Uganda and Guatemala)– Went to field before WEAI was finalized; collected an
extensive pilot version• Only FTF country to collect WEAI nationally• First FTF country to publicly release data• Lowest WEAI score among the 13 countries
included in global report• Showed remarkable improvement in WEAI scores
in only 2 years (+17%)
32
Baseline Results
• Preliminary WEAI results shared broadly, even before baseline report was finalized
• Generated a lot of demand for more analysis and for access to data
• BIHS released for public access in April 2013
• Published open-access research article on WEAI and food security (Sraboni et al 2014)
Which domains contribute most to disempowerment of women?
33
In-ad-equacy in
Leader-
ship32%
In-ade-quacy in Re-
sources
21%
In-ade-quacy in In-
come 20%
In-ad-equacy in
Pro-duction16%
Inadequacy in time12%
FtF Zone
In-ad-equacy in
Leader-
ship35%
Inadequacy in Resources
22%
In-ad-equacy in In-
come
15%
In-ad-equacy in
Production15%
In-ad-equacy in
Time13%
Bangladesh
Which indicators contribute most to disempowerment of women in the FtF zone?
34
Leadership32%
Resources21%
Income 19%
Production16%
Time12%
Lack of group membership 17%
Inadequate ownership of assets 5%
Lack of input in decision-making over purchase, sale or transfer of assets 7%
Insufficient access to and decisions on credit 9%
Lack of control over use of income 19%
Lack of input in productive decisions 11%
Insufficient autonomy in production 5%
Discomfort in speaking in public 15%
Inadequate leisure 7%
Dissatisfaction with workload 5%
How do major disempowering factors differ by region? Comparing FtF zone and Rangpur division
35
LEADERSHIP32%
PRODUCTION16%
IN-COME
19%
LEADERSHIP35%
TIME16%
INCOME11%
FTF ZONE RANGPURLack of control over use of income 19%
Discomfort in speaking in public 15%
Lack of group membership 17%
Lack of input in productive decisions 11%
Lack of group membership 19%
Lack of control over use of income 11%
Discomfort in speaking in public 16%
Inadequate leisure 11%
Similarities and Differences in disempowering factors among men and women: FtF Zone
36
LEADERSHIP32%
PRODUCTION16%
IN-COME
19%
LEADERSHIP38%
TIME
25%
RE-SOURCE
S17%
Lack of control over use of income 19%
Lack of input in productive decisions 11%
Discomfort in speaking in public 15%
Lack of group membership 17%
Insufficient access to and decisions on credit 12%
Discomfort in speaking in public 13%
Lack of group membership 25%
Excessiveworkload 13%
WOMEN MEN
Baseline Findings• Global report released last May
2014 with findings from 13 of the 19 countries, as well as cross-country comparisons
• Suggestive evidence that women’s empowerment is strongly correlated with several outcomes (EBF, MAD), but not with others (WDDS, children’s nutritional status)
37
Cross-country baseline findings
Banglad
esh
Tajik
istan
Kenya
NepalHaiti
Uganda
Cambodia
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
LeisureWorkloadSpeaking in publicGroup memberControl over use of incomeAccess to and decisions on creditPurchase, sale, or transfer of assetsOwnership of assetsAutonomy in productionInput in productive decisions
Dise
mpo
wer
men
t Ind
ex (1
- 5D
E)
38
• USAID Bangladesh responded to the WEAI baseline findings by:– Retrofitting existing programs– Encouraging partners to take up activities focused on promoting
women’s empowerment in the FTF zone– Funded US$6 million worth of new programs that aim to improve
women’s empowerment in the 5 domains• IFPRI working with the Bangladesh government Ministry of
Agriculture (MOA) to orient agriculture toward nutrition and women’s empowerment (RCT to test alternative approaches)
What gets measured, gets done!
39
Presentation for the FTF Gender Cluster MeetingHKI, DhakaNovember 17, 2014
The Feed the Future Zone of Influence in Bangladesh: Changes in Selected Indicators from 2011 Baseline to 2015 MidlineAkhter AhmedRicardo Hernandez, Zeeshan Abedin, Julie Ghostlaw, Nusrat Hossain, Wahidur Quabili, Farha Sufian, Salauddin Tauseef
Bangladesh Policy Research and Strategy Support Program, IFPRI Presentation at BFS/USAID Washington, DCMarch 17, 2016
Created a comprehensive database for the Feed the Future ZOI
IFPRI-PRSSP’s Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS): the most comprehensive, nationally representative rural household survey to date. Largest panel survey.
A part of BIHS has been designed to serve as the baseline, midline, and endline for estimating change in a set of FTF indicators.
BIHS sampling is statistically representative nationally of rural Bangladesh,rural areas for each of the 7 administrative divisions,FTF Zone of Influence.
41
BIHS Baseline-Midline FTF sample
Two-round panel:
FTF baseline (Nov-Dec 2011): 2,040 HHsFTF midline (Jan-Mar 2015): 2,017 HHs
Low attrition: 1.3%/year
Map of Bangladesh showing the survey upazilas in the Feed the Future sampling frame.
42
BIHS: Big data, big impact
Downloads of 2011/12 BIHS dataset: 600 (2013) 8,000 (now)Diverse users across 6 continents
43
Change in FTF Indicators from 2011/12 to 2015:
Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture
(updated results)
44
Overall WEAI results in the FTF ZOI
45
Women's 5DE Men's 5DE GPI WEAI0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.67
0.84 0.81
0.68
0.78
0.88 0.90
0.80
2011/12 Baseline 2015 Midline
Perc
ent
+18% +6% +11% +17%Growth rate
Remarkable improvement in women’s empowerment status in the FTF ZOI
46
Empowered headcount
Adequacy score Women with gender parity
Empowerment gap0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
27.4
54.1
40.231.6
41.2
63.2
50.7
21.0
2011/12 Baseline 2015 Midline
Perc
ent
Men’s empowerment status improved as well
47
Empowerment headcount Adequacy score0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
52.16
65.7664.0167.19
2011/12 Baseline 2015 Midline
Perc
ent
Which domains contribute most to disempowerment of women in the FTF zone?
2011/12 - 2015
481 – 5DE: 0.33 1 – 5DE: 0.22
Inadequacy in Time; 15%
Inadequacy in Leader-ship; 34%
Inadequacy in Resources; 20%
Inadequacy in Production; 15%
Inadequacy in Income; 16%
2011/12 Baseline
Inadequacy in Time;
16%
Inade-quacy in Leader-
ship; 39%
Inadequacy in Re-
sources; 27%
Inadequacy in Produc-tion; 12%
Inadequacy in Income; 6%
2015 Midline
Changes in WEAI disempowerment headcount in 10 sub-domain indicators
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
34
17
22
32
48
26
56 56
25 25
10
17
12
3740
7
49
35
1519
2011/12 baseline 2019 midline
Perc
ent
Conclusions
50
Poverty has declined in the FTF ZOI by 16% from baseline to midline. Poverty decline was more for the poorest of the poor than those who are less poor.
Key factors that help households move out of poverty are education, non-farm income, women’s empowerment, access to electricity, physical asset holding, and savings. If the size of safety net transfer is at least 15% of income of recipient households then safety net participation tends to prevent households from backsliding into poverty.
Household incomes, measured in terms of per capita expenditures, increased in the FTF ZOI by 18%. The magnitude of increase was much higher for the poor.
Increased farmers’ income is positively associated with education, mechanized irrigation, access to commercial loans, women’s empowerment in agriculture, access to electricity, ownership of cell phone and solar panel, as well as non-farm income.
Conclusions
51
Dietary diversity of reproductive-aged women in the FTF ZOI shows a modest 5% increase. Women’s and children’s dietary diversity are improving, but these areas still call for greater attention.
Increased dietary diversity is positively associated with education, agricultural production diversity, women’s empowerment in agriculture, access to electricity, mechanized irrigation, remittances, non-farm income.
Only 27% of women in the FTF ZOI were empowered at baseline. In 2015, 41% in the ZOI were empowered. Women’s empowerment in agriculture improves dietary diversity, increases farmers’ income, and helps households move out of poverty. Therefore, promoting women’s empowerment should remain paramount to the FTF agenda to attain complementary development goals.
52
Lessons from the Bangladesh experience
• Make data available early• Regional analysis greatly increased usefulness of
the data to other organizations working outside the FTF zone
• Encourage other users to use the data (Bangladesh data set was the first FTF data set to be publicly available)
• Have enough in-country support for data analysis so that if policymakers ask for more information, it can be provided in a timely manner
53
Lessons from the Bangladesh experience• Share research results with local stakeholders early to get
feedback and to build ownership of the research process• But what if the results change, or are not too favorable?
– Be clear about results that are preliminary estimates– Use sound analytical methods that can be defended– If results aren’t “good”, look for credible reasons why—this might be
an opportunity for policy intervention. – For example: Bangladesh had the lowest levels of overall
empowerment in the baseline. The disempowerment gaps helped inform the design of a new pilot project for nutrition-sensitive agriculture, with gender sensitization
• Use diagnosed gaps as a way to motivate policy change• Take advantage of long history of policy engagement and
research in country to have a similar engagement in the area of women’s empowerment
THANK YOU
For more information, visit the WEAI Resource Center: http://www.ifpri.org/topic/weai-resource-center
Or contact Hazel Malapit, [email protected]
Gender and Agriculture: Reviewing the evidence and the way forwardGetfam Hotel, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 17 June 2016