the vote formula: resource allocation methodology

34
The Vote Formula: Resource Allocation Methodology Planning Division October 2010

Upload: eugene

Post on 05-Jan-2016

66 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

The Vote Formula: Resource Allocation Methodology. Planning Division October 2010. Resource allocation. We will be covering: The resource allocation process Provide an overview of the College’s resource allocation model called the Vote Formula. The resource allocation process. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Resource Allocation Methodology

Planning Division

October 2010

Page 2: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Resource allocation

We will be covering:

• The resource allocation process

• Provide an overview of the College’s resource allocation model called the Vote Formula

Page 3: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The resource allocation process

• Resource allocation takes place from January to March and is overseen by the Resource Allocation Committee (RAC)

• The RAC is responsible for the methodology (Vote Formula) used in allocating general recurrent funding to the faculties and Business School

• The RAC reports to the Management Board, its membership is:- Chairman, Deputy Rector- Principals (Faculty and Business School)- COO, Director of Planning, Director of Finance, College

Secretary

Page 4: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The resource allocation process

• The RAC meet three to four times each year

• A few days before the RAC meetings members of the Planning Division meet with the FFOs and FOOs

• The final Vote Formula allocations, as proposed by RAC, are presented to the Management Board in March for approval

Page 5: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

What is the Vote Formula?

• The College’s main mechanism for distributing general funds to the faculties (and the Business School)

• Most (but not all) income from HEFCE and from fees that the College receives is distributed to faculties through the Gross Vote Formula

• Some of that resource is retrieved through the Infrastructure Charge mechanism to fund the College’s non-academic departments

Page 6: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Resource allocation: General Objectives

• EQUITY in the distribution of HEFCE grant and tuition fees

• INCENTIVES to change behaviour to further the strategic objectives of the College

• Financial STABILITY

Page 7: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Why a formula?

Principally:• Based on performance, not influence

Also:• Is relatively transparent• Provides gearing with HEFCE’s formula, but takes College

circumstances into account

“Formula reflects but does not mimic HEFCE’s formula”• Allows organic change in academic profile • Can be used as a planning tool

Page 8: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Disadvantages of a formula

• Data are historic; a time lag is inbuilt so faculties that are expanding are restrained and those that are contracting are buffered

• Difficult to take special factors into account

• Danger of lack of transparency if becomes too complicated over time

• Strategic direction of College must be mediated through formula; strategic initiatives and new academic activities have to be provided for in other ways

Page 9: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Overview of the Vote Formula

• The Management Board (in February each year) determines the total amounts to be distributed to faculties and non-academic departments

• These two together form the Gross Vote Pot

Page 10: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Overview of the Vote Formula

Firstly, four items are allocated directly to faculties from the Gross Vote Pot:•HEFCE funding for charity funded research (c stream)•HEFCE funding for strategically important and vulnerable subjects (s stream)•100% premium element (premium fee less the standard fee) (p)•25% standard overseas fees (o)

Page 11: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Overview of the Vote Formula

• The remaining Gross Vote Pot is then divided into two portions, one for Teaching (T) and one for Research (R)

• This division is done using the R:T ratio which is calculated on the basis of College income from HEFCE and fees, less the directly allocated items

Page 12: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Overview of the Vote Formula

Gross Vote Pot

(funds Faculties

and non-academic departments)

Page 13: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Overview of the Vote Formula

R T

Items directly allocated to facultiesThe remainder is split into a Research (R) pot and a Teaching (T) pot:

Page 14: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Overview of the Vote Formula

R T

Items directly allocated to faculties

Infrastructure charge

Page 15: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Overview of the Vote Formula

Net Vote to faculties (includes directly allocated items)

Faculties

Infrastructure charge Non-academic

departments

Page 16: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: The Gross Vote

• Formulae are used to distribute each of the six streams of the Gross Vote Pot between the Faculties (and the Business School).

• All the resource that is available is allocated to the Faculties in the Gross Vote allocations. Then some of it is retrieved through the Infrastructure Charge mechanism.

R T

Four directly allocated items(s, c, p, o)

Page 17: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: The Gross Vote

In both the R and T formulas:

• Volume measures are used to determine the activity occurring in departments/faculties

• Weightings are applied to each stream of volumes to affect the relative importance of the various streams

Page 18: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The T Vote: Volume Measures

• The T formula uses STUDENT LOAD data for its volume measures.

• Student load is used rather than student registrations to reflect the fact that various departments/faculties may contribute to a student’s teaching.

• Student load information is collected annually through the Student Load Exercise.

Page 19: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The T Vote: Weightings

Weightings are applied to the volumes in relation to:

• Type of student

(Undergraduate or Postgraduate Taught)• Type of teaching

(own, service or exported)• Subject matter

(clinical medicine, lab-based, maths, other)

Page 20: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The R Vote: Volume Measures

R volume is measured through the following

streams:

• FTE of 2008 RAE-active staff (Category A)

• Postgraduate Research (PGR) Student Load FTE

• Staff expenditure on all research grants and contracts

Page 21: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The R Vote: Weightings

Weightings are applied to the volumes in relation to:

• Performance in the 2008 RAE

• Subject matter of teaching for Research students

(clinical medicine or lab-based, maths, other)

Page 22: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: the C & S streams

C stream• As UK Charity sponsors do not usually pay full economic costs,

HEFCE receives funds from the UK government to pass on to HEIs to support charity research.

• These funds are mapped from UoAs to the most appropriate faculties. Resource is passed directly to the faculties in what is referred to as the c stream.

S stream• HEFCE provides extra funding in relation to certain science

subjects. We pass this on to the relevant faculties.

Page 23: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Overseas fees

• Faculties receive 25% of the appropriate full standard overseas fee for each overseas student, a year in arrears.

• Overseas students are also funded through the gross T or R vote, at the same rates as Home/EU students.

Page 24: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Premium Fees

• Some faculties charge fees that are higher than the standard College fee for a particular type of course. These are referred to as premium fees.

• The premium fee element is the margin between the actual (premium) fee level and the College standard fee for a course.

• Faculties receive 100% of the premium fee element, one year in arrears.

Page 25: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Premium Fees and Overseas Fees

Example: UG Y1 Overseas student on Mechanical Engineering course

£20,400

£1,100(Premium fee)

GROSS POT

Faculty of EngineeringO/S fees element

£4,825(25% of £19,300)

Remainder £14,475(75% of £19,300)

Page 26: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: The Gross Vote

• So now, each of the six streams in the Gross Vote has been divided up across the Faculties (and the Business School).

• Next, the Infrastructure Charge is applied to retrieve resource to fund the non-academic departments.

R T

Four directly allocated items(s, c, p, o)

Page 27: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge

• Recovers cost of non-academic departments

• Total amount is decided annually by the Management Board

• Divided into streams related to four main types of activity:- Student load FTEs stream

- Staff FTEs stream

- Space sqm stream

- Research £k staff expenditure stream

• Resource Allocation Committee (RAC) decides how much of the total Infrastructure Charge amount should be distributed against each volume stream

Page 28: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure charge

InfrastructurInfrastructure Chargee Charge

Infrastructure Infrastructure ChargeCharge

Page 29: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge

6%

Student Load34%

Staff16%

Space 38%

RG&C Exp.12%

Page 30: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge

Student Load34%

Staff16%

Space 38%

RG&C Exp.12%

ENGINEERINGENGINEERING

MEDICINEMEDICINE

NATURAL SCIENCESNATURAL SCIENCES

BUSINESS SCHOOLBUSINESS SCHOOL

37%

32%24%

26%

48%

3%

37%

31%

2%

32%

20%

24%

58%

1%

24%

8%

31%

25%29%

21%

Page 31: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge

ENGINEERINGENGINEERING

MEDICINEMEDICINE

NATURAL SCIENCESNATURAL SCIENCES

BUSINESS SCHOOLBUSINESS SCHOOL

33%

35%

28%

4%

Page 32: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula Conclusion

• Each Faculty (and the Business School) receives a Net Vote allocation

• This consists of its share of the Gross Vote

Gross Vote = T + R + c + s + o + p

less its share of the Infrastructure Charge (InfCh)

Net Vote = Gross Vote – Infrastructure Charge

Page 33: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

Outside the Vote Formula

In addition to formulaic allocations, the Resource Allocation Committee may also distribute additional resource alongside the Net Vote allocations.

Other sources of income to the Faculties include:

•Research Income including Overheads and fEC income

•Resource from HEFCE earmarked for specific purposes

•Allocations from SIF

Page 34: The Vote Formula:  Resource Allocation Methodology

The Vote Formula

Questions and Discussion