the use of weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

17
7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 1/17 Vol. 12 No. 4, October 2007 Contents | Author index | Subject index | Search | Home The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information Judit Bar-Ilan Department of Information Science Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel Abstract Introduction. Blogging is a relatively new phenomenon but it has already gained high popularity. This paper reports the use of blogs (a.k.a. Weblogs) by libraries and librarians. Method. The list of blogs was compiled from data obtained from several lists/directories at two points in time, in December 2003 and in February 2005. The blogs and the content of one month of postings were characterized using multi-faceted content analysis. The blogs identified in 2003 were compared to the blogs listed in 2005. Results. In general, the findings indicate that blogs have an impact on the activities of information professionals and they are a novel information channel for transferring information both to fellow professionals and to other users of the Web. In addition they also serve as an efficient tool for "marketing" library events and resources. Librarians use blogs to disseminate professional and general information, while libraries often use blogs for announcements. Conclusions. Libraries utilize blogs in a novel way that allows them to disseminate information to their patrons. Even though there has been a considerable increase in the number of libraries with blogs, further growth can be expected, since as of February 2005 only a minority of the libraries utilized this tool. CHA NGE FONT Introduction Blogs or Weblogs (in this paper we will use the generally accepted term: blog) were little known six years ago; Rebecca Blood (2000 ) states that at the beginning of 1999 there were only twenty-three known blogs. The page of only Weblogs (Garrett 2002 ), a supposedly exhaustive list of blogs, listed about 300 as of October, 2000. A survey by Perseus (Henning 2003 ) estimated the number of blogs at 4.12 million and the number of active blogs (having new entries in the last two months) at 1.4 million; their forecast was for about ten million blogs by the end of 2004. In mid February 2005, Technorati , a tool for monitoring blogs, watched 7,012,022 blogs. Thus the growth in the number of blogs on the Web is clearly exponential.

Upload: kshema-prakash-dwibhashyam

Post on 26-Oct-2015

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Blogging and libraries

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 1/17

Vol. 12 No. 4, October 2007

Contents | Author index | Subject index | Search | Home

The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries todisseminate information

Judit Bar-IlanDepartment of Information Science

Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

Abstract

Introduction. Blogging is a relatively new phenomenon but it has already gained high popularity. This paper

reports the use of blogs (a.k.a. Weblogs) by libraries and librarians.

Method. The list of blogs was compiled from data obtained from several lists/directories at two points in

time, in December 2003 and in February 2005. The blogs and the content of one month of postings were

characterized using multi-faceted content analysis. The blogs identified in 2003 were compared to the blogs

listed in 2005.

Results. In general, the findings indicate that blogs have an impact on the activities of information

professionals and they are a novel information channel for transferring information both to fellow

professionals and to other users of the Web. In addition they also serve as an efficient tool for "marketing"library events and resources. Librarians use blogs to disseminate professional and general information, while

libraries often use blogs for announcements.

Conclusions. Libraries utilize blogs in a novel way that allows them to disseminate information to their

patrons. Even though there has been a considerable increase in the number of libraries with blogs, furthergrowth can be expected, since as of February 2005 only a minority of the libraries utilized this tool.

CHANGE FONT

Introduction

Blogs or Weblogs (in this paper we will use the generally accepted term: blog) were little known six years ago; Rebecca Blood(2000) states that at the beginning of 1999 there were only twenty-three known blogs. The page of only Weblogs (Garrett

2002), a supposedly exhaustive list of blogs, listed about 300 as of October, 2000. A survey by Perseus (Henning 2003)estimated the number of blogs at 4.12 million and the number of active blogs (having new entries in the last two months) at 1.4

million; their forecast was for about ten million blogs by the end of 2004. In mid February 2005, Technorati, a tool for monitoringblogs, watched 7,012,022 blogs. Thus the growth in the number of blogs on the Web is clearly exponential.

Page 2: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 2/17

'Weblogs are pages consisting of several posts or chunks of information per page, usually arranged in reverse chronology'

(Bausch, Haughey & Hourihan 2002: 7). Weil (2003) provides twenty definitions of a blog, where each describes a differentaspect and the list of definitions as a whole provide a humorous description of what blogs are about. A comprehensive discussion

of blogging and the specific terminology is provided by Wikipedia (2005). Some blogs contain links to Web sites or to other blogsand their main purpose is to discuss the contents of the linked sites or simply to inform about the existence of the sites/products.

Such blogs are usually topic oriented and disseminate information without personal involvement. However, often the blog is "amixture of what is happening in a person's life and what is happening on the Web" (MarketingTerms n.d.), and there are also blogs

that emphasize the personal side only: such blogs are online versions of traditional diaries. Thus, there is a continuum of blog typesranging from purely topic-oriented to purely personal.

Currently there are a number of blogging tools that enable users to create their online diaries with ease (for a review see Rubenking2003). These tools, often free, "offer you instant communication power by letting you post your thoughts to the Web whenever theurge strikes" (Blogger 2004). Besides enabling posting time-stamped messages and providing permalinks (permanent links to the

posted messages), a simple archiving mechanism. As messages accumulate they are moved from the front page to the archive, butthey continue to be accessible through the permalinks. Blogging tools usually have mechanisms that allow the readers of the

postings to comment on messages, a feature that can be disabled. On the sidebars of the opening page of a blog, the blog ownermay place additional information and links, e.g., some personal information (sometimes as a link), a short introduction to the blog,

a list of blogs the author considers interesting (called a blogroll), lists of noteworthy sites other than blogs, or a link to RSS feeds,where RSS is a means to automatically distribute headlines, links and short summaries of blogposts (also called syndication). RSS

stands for Rich Site Summary or Really Simple Syndication.

What is the relevance of blogs to librarians and to information professionals? The ASIST Professional Guidelines (1992) state that

information professionals should seek "to extend public awareness and appreciation of information availability". The mission

statement in the ALA's (American Library Association) policy manual (2005, adopted in 1986) declares that "librarians arerecognized as proactive professionals responsible for ensuring the free flow of information and ideas to present and future

generations of library users". As such, librarians and information professional should not only provide information on demand and

act as intermediaries between the users and the information, but should alert to the existence of novel, relevant information andprovide access and facilitate the effective use of resources, technologies and information retrieval tools by users and fellow

professionals. An additional responsibility of the information professional is to "uphold each user's, provider's, or employer's right

to privacy and confidentiality and to respect whatever proprietary rights belong to them" (ASIST Professional Guidelines 1992).

With the increased complexity of the application of the principles of fair use, copyright, privacy and intellectual property in theelectronic world, the information professional must be constantly aware of the developments in these areas. Blogs are ideal for

disseminating all types of information chosen by the blogger, for commenting, expressing opinions and for discussing implications.

They can also be utilized to provide local information (e.g., changes in opening hours, special lectures and new acquisitions). Thefindings of this paper show that librarians and information professionals utilize blogs for these purposes.

The potential of blogs for information dissemination has been clearly demonstrated in the last paragraph, but they can only achieve

real impact if they attract a significant readership. According to Cyberatlas (Greenspan, 2003), in 2003 only 2% of the onlinecommunity set up blogs and only 4% of the community read blogs. Data from the PEW Internet and American Life Project

(Rainie, 2005) show that the number of bloggers and blog readers is increasing at least in the United States: 7% of the American

Internet users have created blogs and 27% said that they read blogs. There is no specific information on the readership of librarianblogs.

In this paper an attempt was made to collect a relatively exhaustive list of English language blogs created by libraries, librarians orinformation professionals. These blogs were characterized from multiple aspects, in order to examine whether they or a subset of

them can serve as information dissemination tools.

Blogs with an emphasis on library and information science blogs were discussed in a book, several papers and presentations (e.g.,

Crawford 2001, Fichter 2001, 2003a, 2003b; Clyde 2002a, 2002b, 2003, 2004a, 2004b; Cohen 2003, Sauers, 2006). Clyde

(2003, 2004b) studied the use of blogs by libraries and analysed several features of them. She claimed that there is a discrepancy

between the potential of the blogs for libraries and their actual use and was disappointed by the small number of libraries currentlyutilizing blogs. Data for Clyde's analyses were collected in July 2004. Crawford (2005, 2006) also analysed librarian blogs both in

2005 and 2006. Data for this paper were collected in February 2005. As a point of reference, the results based on data from

Page 3: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 3/17

February 2005 are compared with the results of a previous paper (Bar-Ilan 2004) for data that was collected in December 2003

using similar methods and sources. This comparison provides an insight to the changes that occurred to library and librarian blogs

over a period of fourteen months.

Methodology

Data collection

The first step in this study was to create a list of English-language blogs maintained by librarians, information professionals and

libraries. Only blogs that provided information for librarians and information professionals and/or disseminated non-personalinformation to the general public were included. Often the blog postings contained personal information as well, but blogs where all

the postings were personal were excluded. Personal blogs are widespread on the Web and among librarians, but their uses were

not examined in this study.

Data were collected on two occasions, in December 2003 and in February 2005 which enabled the analysis of changes in the

blogging patterns of librarians over time. Except for two or three entries that were only discovered during the content analysis of

the blogs, the list for the first data collection point was compiled on 5 December, 2003. The list for the second data collectionpoint was compiled on 15 February, 2005; the blogs were checked for existence and activity between February 15 and 19, 2005.

Only active blogs were analysed, where active is defined following Henning (2003) as blogs that were updated at least once during

the two months period prior to the date of inspection.

In order to create as exhaustive as possible a list of blog, a large number of sources was consulted and different retrieval

techniques were used. Each source and techniques has its limitations and to try to overcome some of these limitations multiple

sources and techniques were applied. The use of multiple methods considerably improves data collection, thus a very detaileddescription of the data collection process is provided here. The directories and lists consulted for creating the list are listed below

in chronological order for both the first and the second rounds, December 2003 and February 2005 respectively (for pages no

longer active, the link points to the archived page at the Internet Archive:

The Open Directory (this was the primary source): the major category consulted was Reference->Libraries->Library andInformation Science-> Weblogs . This category had a main category and three subcategories: collaborative Weblogs,organizational Weblogs and personal Weblogs. Altogether 328 blogs were listed at the time of the first data collection(December, 2003). At the time of the second data collection (February, 2005), the personal Weblogs subcategory nolonger existed, librarians and information professionals were instructed to submit their personal blogs to a different category.Thus personal Weblogs identified in the first round were not analysed and 120 active blogs from the Open Directory wereincluded in the December 2003 list: those listed in the main category and in organizational and collaborative Weblogssubcategories. In February 2005, 327 Weblogs were listed in the Open Directory categories, but only 227 of them wereactive at the time of inspection.Library Weblogs: eleven additional blogs were identified in December 2003. In February 2005 this source contributedforty-five additional active blogs to the list.Blogwise was an indexed list of blogs (no longer accessible); here, blogs were browsed under the keywords: librarian,librarians, librarians indexers, librarianship, libraries, library, library cataloging, library science, librarytechnology, information officer, information science, information professionals and information workers. Four blogswere identified through this source in December 2003. In February 2005, library science and library technology were notlisted as keywords, but library news appeared in the list; altogether nine additional blogs were identified in the secondround.Dr. Anne Clyde also maintained a list of LIS Weblogs (this list is now only accessible through the Internet Archive), fouradditional blogs were located in the first round and one in the second.In both rounds one additional blog was located through Excite UK Directory.Two blogs were found through the blogroll of Blogs without a Library in December 2003 . The page not longer exists,but, as it was seen in February 2005, can be found at the Internet Archive. It contributed sixty-seven additional blogs in2005.In the first round LISfeeds.com did not contribute any new blogs, but in the second round, twenty-six blogs were locatedthrough this source.In the second round, Google was also searched for list library blogs and list librarian blogs, these searches pointed us to

Page 4: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 4/17

an additional source, SLS Member Blogs that contributed three additional blogs.Through Ann Clyde's page on Weblogs and Directories, Bloglines, a tool for searching blogs was reached. Here a searchfor library or librarian or libraries or librarians was carried out and 42,185 results were reported: the first 1,200 resultswere scanned (the results list contained a considerable number of duplicates) and through this process forty-five additionalblogs were identified.We also submitted a query to Google and asking for pages with links pointing to a blog with a high number of incominglinks, in this case Peter Scott's blog. At the time of data collection the blog resided at http://blog.xrefer.com and the searchstring was: 'link:blog.xrefer.com'. The results of this search pointed to some additional blogs and bloglists: Select LibraryBlogs by Susan Herzog, Jen's Library Blog and Technogeekery. These sources contributed seven, two and one additionalblogs respectively.Several blogs were discovered by singling out links on the blogrolls of the examined blogs. In both rounds, one blog wasfound by browsing the blogroll of the Commons blog and three on the blogroll of Library Chronicles. In the second roundten additional blogs were discovered through the blogrolls of the Georgia State University blogs, three through theblogroll of Peter Scott's blog, three blogs through the blogroll of the University of Tennessee blogs, three through theblogroll of the North Carolina State University's blog , two through the blogroll of the Sellers Library Teens Blog andtwo blogs through the Moraine Valley Community College Library's blog list . It was not possible to undertake asystematic examination of the blogrolls of the library-related blogs for the discovery of additional items. Blogs are usuallyheavily linked to other blogs discussing similar topics, thus the technique of inspecting blogrolls can be a valuable, but timeconsuming method for discovering additional blogs.Technorati, a blog search engine which monitors blogs, was also utilized for discovering new blogs. For each monitoredblog, Technorati lists the blogs that link to it. Here a method similar to the Google link method, described previously, wasemployed. From the existing list, few blogs that had a large number of links pointing to were selected. From the list of blogslinking to them, we tried to manually filter out the library and information science blogs by scanning the lists. Filtering wasnecessary since not only library and information science blogs pointed to the selected blogs. This process resulted in eightadditional blogs, blogs linking to Library stuff , to Peter Scott's blog and to the Shifted Librarian .One blog was simply discovered by browsing the Web.Additional lists or directories were consulted, however no additional blogs were discovered through these lists:

BlogBib CARL 2002Globe of BlogsThe Yahoo Directory entry on WeblogsEatonWeb: in February 2005, the site did not function properlyLibrary NetworkingZeal.com: the site was shut down in 2006

As a last step in the data collection in February 2005, the new list was compared to the December 2003 list and a singleblog that was active both in December 2003 and in February 2005 was identified, even though it did not appear on the listcompiled in February 2005. This blog was added to the February 2005 list.

Thus, an effort was made to create an exhaustive list of English language library and information science blogs. Of course, the

process is limited by the quality of the sources we located, but the large degree of overlap between the lists and the fact that anumber of lists have not produced additional blogs may indicate that the lists are quite comprehensive. A wide range of techniquesfor locating library and information science blogs was applied: consulting well-known lists, using search engines to discover

additional blogs and lists of blogs, scanning the blogrolls of the already located blogs and locating blogs that link to blogs already inthe list. Crawford (2005) analysed librarian Weblogs, for his study he consulted: LISFeeds, the Open Directory and Libdex: all

these sources were also examined for this study.

In the first round, 354 blogs were identified and were visited between December 21, 2003 and January 1, 2004. Only blogs that

had entries in or after November 2003 were characterized (blogs not fulfilling this criterion were inactive for at least two months;the usual definition of inactive blogs). Some of the URLs were non-existent, while other blogs were inactive or the URLs did notlead to a blog. Altogether 157 blogs were analysed in the first round. In the second round 470 active blogs were located.

In the second data collection round all the blogs listed in the first round, but not present in the February 2005 list were revisited.Some of these blogs had moved to a different URL, some had turned into personal blogs with no library-related content, others

had disappeared or had become inactive. Only one blog from the first list was absent from the second list and this blog wasincluded for further analysis.

Page 5: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 5/17

Content analysis: first round

In the first round an extensive content analysis of the blogs and of all the postings in November 2003 (see for example,Krippendorff 2004 or (Neuendorf 2001) was carried out. For each blog the following information was recorded:

blog title;URL of the blog;name of creator, where available;job description or type of organization (librarian, LIS student, LIS graduate, library or library system, consultant,academic, information professional, PhD student, Web developer, library association, community, other and unspecified).Values for this category were assigned based on the personal description, the introductory note, the name of the blog, thedescription in the directories or based on the content of the blog postings (in this order). When no information was located,the value unspecified was recorded. In case the blog owner provided multiple job descriptions, multiple values were givenin this category;affiliation or address of organization, where available;blog description, where available. As it appears on the main page of the blog or in the directory where the URL waslocated;type of authorship: single, community, organization, other or unknown;initiation date of blog: month and year. The value for this category was based on the earliest archive entry. Sometimesblog writers switch blogging tools or hosting sites and older blog postings cannot be located, thus it is possible that theactual initiation is earlier than the date recorded by us. In a few cases we assigned values in this category based oninformation found elsewhere on the Web;commenting: enabled or disabled;Daypop rank by score and Daypop rank by citation: Daypop monitored 41233 blogs at the beginning of January, 2004.The ranks and citations are based on the set of monitored blogs, out of the 157 blogs identified in the first round, Daypopprovided rankings for only fifty blogs;The number of blogs pointing to the given blog, based on data retrieved by Technorati on January 3, 2004. At thattime Technorati reported to have watched 1,477,060 Weblogs and it provided information for 139 blogs out of the 157blogs listed in the first round;number of postings during November 2003;overall content: topic-oriented (professional topic), mixed (a mixture of personal and topic-oriented postings) and other.The intended topic of the blog was deduced from the blog description. Blogs where all the content was personal wereexcluded from the analysis, but they were included in (Bar-Ilan 2004);form of postings: short postings with hypertext links, short postings without hypertext links, essay-type postings with links,essay-type postings without links, copy of information appearing elsewhere, announcements and other (e.g., postingscontaining only photos or images). The values assigned in this category were based on the blog postings of November2003. Multiple values were assigned as needed.themes appearing in postings, based on the postings for November 2003. Multiple values were assigned as needed tocover all the different themes the blog postings covered during November 2003. Even if a theme appeared in severalpostings in a blog it was recorded only once. The set of themes was designed inductively, recurring themes were identifiedand assigned values. The themes are mutually exclusive, i.e., for a given issue discussed in a posting only a single value wasassigned. Table 1 displays the categories with explanations of the major topics belonging to each category.

Theme Topics covered

Professional

Librarian awareness (e.g., lost Internet references, publisher deals,relevant articles)

Databases (e.g., Amazon, but also commercial databases),information services and bibliographies

Information science & library science (e.g., knowledgemanagement, information architecture, information seeking)

LIS studies

Semantic web, ontologies, data mining, metadata, xml

Digital libraries, digital archives, digitization

Page 6: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 6/17

Open access

Ejournals, ebooks, electronic publishing

Traditional librarianship (cataloging, classification, OPACs, etc.)

Scholarly communication (incl. citations)

Preservation, book binding

Library related issues not covered by a more specific category (e.geffect of blogging on libraries, librarian t-shirts, action figure,Dewey hotel)

General

Alerting to general information

Blogging (incl. technological aspects, e.g., RSS)

Internet searching and retrieval (including business issues, e.g.,Google's IPO)

Book announcements and reviews

Intellectual property, copyright, DCMA, ethics, privacy, fair use,censorship

Specific resources in area of expertise (e.g science resources forscience libraries: sites, articles, not databases)

Technology (e.g., computer hardware, cellular phones, pdas)

Computing (incl. open source, software applications and security)

Law related issues not covered by the intellectual propertycategory

Politics

Ecommerce (incl. music downloads)

Usability, design, HCI

Spam

Effects of the Internet and other Internet related issues

Local/administrative

Conference announcements, lecture announcements,course/workshop announcements (continuing education)

Reports from conferences

Financial aspects (funding, budget, scholarships etc.)

Job announcements

Local news and announcements (closing, progress in construction,usage statistics)

Invitation to local events (story-telling, special lecture, etc.)

New acquisitions

Local resources

TOC of publication/ bibliographic reference

Local technical details (system down, upgrades, changes inblogging software, etc.)

Local thanks and greetings (birthday, Valentine's day,congratulations, etc.)

Local help (asking for and/or providing, e.g., how to find full text ofarticles, can you find a map)

Superficially relatedto

libraries/librariansLibrary stories (e.g., questions by patrons)

Personal/otherPersonal stories about oneself/family/friends

Other

Page 7: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 7/17

Table 1: Values for the theme of blogposting category and short explanations

Content analysis: second round

For the second round, the blog title, its URL, type of authorship (single, community or organization), job description, the date of

the latest posting (this was checked between February 15 and 19; all inactive blogs were revisited on February 19, to checkwhether any activity occurred after February 15) and the initiation date of the blogs were recorded. The Technorati rankings of

the blogs were recorded on February 21, 2005. At that time, Technorati reported that it tracked 7,231,328 blogs and

864,852,486 links.

In this round a new category was added, the general purpose of the blogs maintained by libraries and library networks. Possible

values for this category were: local information for clients, local information for the library staff, local information for staff and

clients, guide for clients, guide for staff, guide for clients and staff and other. The value guide was assigned to blogs that containedmainly information that was not specifically local, e.g., Web resources, general news items, search tools, databases that are not

licensed by the library, but are accessible to anyone. The values were based on the description ('About') of the blog, if such a

description existed; otherwise it was deduced from the January-February postings. Often the postings included both local and

non-local information, in this case the general purpose was decided according to the majority of the examined postings. In a fewcases the opening posting of the blog was also consulted, since sometimes this posting provides clues about the intended audience.

Further analysis was carried out for blogs maintained by libraries and library networks that constituted the largest group in

February 2005. For this set of blogs, themes of the February 2005 postings were identified, the number of postings in that monthwas recorded and we checked whether commenting was enabled.

Reliability of coding

In order to assess the reliability of the categorizations, the themes of fifty-two randomly chosen blogs were analysed by a second

coder. Krippendorff's alpha (Krippendorff 2004) was computed. Krippendorff (2004) recommends the alpha to be 0.800 or

above at significance level 0.05 for the results of content analyses to be acceptable. The required sample size to achieve this

significance level for binary variables is fifty-two. Each of the five themes was considered as a separate 0-1 variable: 1 if the themewas present in the postings and 0 when the theme did not appear in the postings. The results of the α-agreement appear in Table

2. All the results, except for personal and other the reliabilities are above 0.8. Variables for which α is between 0.667 and 0.800

can be used only for drawing tentative conclusions (Krippendorff 2004: 241). Since in this study we excluded purely personalblogs, the agreement level for this variable is also satisfactory.

Table 2: α-agreement values for the different categories

Variable α-agreement Significant at level

Professional 0.923 0.05

General 0.863 0.05

Local/administrative 0.806 0.05

Superficially related to libraries/librarians 0.809 0.05

Personal/other 0.683 0.05

The variable general purpose for library blogs was encoded as two three-valued variables, one had the values: local, guide or

other and the second: clients, staff or both. For three valued variables the minimum sample size for α ≥0.800 at significance level0.05 is 59 (Krippendorff 2004 :240), thus the second coder assigned values to these two variables in a random sample of size 60.

The results show that the α-agreement for the first variable was 0.883 and for the second variable 0.945, showing the reliability of

the coding process.

Results and discussion

Page 8: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 8/17

Growth over time and changes in the authorship distribution

Substantial growth in the number of library and information science blogs located at the two data collection points was observed.In December 2003, 157 active blogs were located and in February 2005 this number grew to 470; 299% growth in 14 months.

Note that almost the same sources for data collection were utilized at both data collection points, thus the growth was not caused

by a change in the data collection method. A closer look at the February 2005 list revealed, that out of the 328 blogs thatappeared for the first time on the list, seventy-five existed before November 2003 and thus should have appeared in round one as

well, but were not listed by the data collection sources in December 2003. The list for February 2005 contains 253 active blogs

that were created after the first data collection point. In the second list, there are 217 blogs that were created before November2003 and 253 after November 2003, i.e., the actual growth was 117%, which is still considerable. The 299% growth mentioned

before was a result of the incomplete listings in December 2003. One cannot be sure that the listing compiled in 2005 is truly

comprehensive; we can only say that among the blogs appearing in the February 2005 list, the majority of the blogs were set upafter November 2003.

The 470 blogs in the second list can be partitioned as follows: 328 blogs were identified for the first time; 111 blogs were also

analysed in the first; another thirty blogs in the list for the second round were alsolocated in the first round, but were excluded from

the analysis then (either because they were inactive or published personal content only). An additional blog was added to the listfor the second round from the first round, it did not appear in any of the sources we consulted in February 2005, but was an active

librarian and information science blog in the second round. From the original list of 157 blogs, 111 (71%) were included in the list

for the second round, since they were active at both data collection points.

At the end of December, 2003 the Open Directory listed 5,373 blogs in different categories, out of these blogs 328 wereclassified as library and information science blogs (including personal blogs of librarians and information professionals), thus library

and information science blogs constituted 6% of the total number of blogs listed. If personal blogs are removed, both from the total

and from the library and information science blogs, the number of listed blogs becomes 2,474 versus 208 library and informationscience blogs and the percentage increases to 8%. Library and information science blogs formed the largest subject specific

category of blogs in the Open Directory as of December 2003. One has to take into account that the Open Directory lists only a

small minority of the blogs: in December 2003, Technorati already monitored about 1.5 million blogs, out of which only about fivethousand were listed by the Open Directory project. The numbers provided by the Open Directory were used here, since it

provides a breakdown of the different types of blogs unlike the other blog monitoring tools (such as Technorati).

By February 2005 the share of the library and information science blogs in the Open Directory project had increased. By then5,040 English language blogs were listed. If we include the category Arts -> Online writing -> Journals, which point mainly to

blogs, this number increases to 6,115. These numbers can be checked through the Internet Archive.

At this time, 5.3% of the listed blogs belonged to library and information science, but unlike in November 2003, personal librarian

blogs were not included in the 327 listed blogs. If personal blogs (4,242 blogs) are removed from the total, then the 327 listedlibrary and information science blogs constitute 17.5% of the English language blogs in the Open Directory (a huge increase

compared to the 8% in December 2003!).

Thus, it seems that blogging is natural for librarians, information professionals and libraries. Another possible reason that has to be

taken into account before arriving at far-reaching conclusions is that the editor (Greg Schwartz) of the main category for libraryand information science blogs might have done a better job than the editors of the other categories or that librarians and

information professionals submit their blogs more actively to the Open Directory than the general population. As of February

2005, the main category for library and information science blogs had no editor (the organizational Weblogs subcategory wasmaintained by Drew Duckworth); however, it is plausible that the library community submits entries more actively to the Open

Directory than the general public. In any case, this finding emphasizes the need for investigating the essence of library and

information science blogs. The characterizations provided in this paper are a step towards this goal.

The authorship of the active blogs examined by us was classified under type of author. Community blogs are maintained by

multiple users, there are two subtypes of this type, one in which anyone can join the current bloggers in the blog by a simple

registration procedure and the other where a set of people decided to create a blog together and outsiders are not invited to join.Organizational blogs are either authored by a single person or by a set of people, but are maintained and affiliated with the

Page 9: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 9/17

organization. Figure 1 depicts the breakdown of authorship in the first and second round.

The two distributions are considerably different, in the first round the majority of the blogs were maintained by a single author,

while at the second round slightly more than half of the blogs were organizational blogs and the share of the other types of blogsdecreased. Of the 252 blogs established after November 2003, eighty-seven were single authored blogs (34.5%), 11 community

blogs (4.4%) and 154 organizational blogs (61.1%). Thus, currently, the trend is growth in the number of organizational blogs.

Among the 217 blogs established before November 2003, only eighty-two were organizational blogs (37.8%). The growth in thenumber of organizational blogs warrants further examination of their purpose and use. The organizational blogs are almost entirely

maintained by libraries and library networks. Because of the huge increase in the number of library and library network blogs

identified in the two rounds, these blogs were characterized more extensively in the second round.

Figure 1: Distribution of authorship in December 2003 and in February 2005

Blog characteristics

Next job description of blogger or type of organization, where the blog is maintained by an organization, typically a library, was

examined. The distribution of the values assigned in this category appears in Table 3. When the blog owner provided multipledescriptions, such as student and librarian, multiple value were assigned. In the first round, the largest category was blogs

maintained by librarians (62 blogs, 39.5%), while in the second round the largest category was blogs affiliated to libraries

(199, 41.5%). A blog that is affiliated to a library is also often maintained by a librarian or by a group of librarians, the differencebetween the two categories is that librarians in blogs maintained by librarians express their own views and ideas, whereas in

blogs affiliated to libraries, the library is responsible for the published content. The distinction between the two types of blogs

was based on the blog description provided by the blog owner or by the directory where the blog was listed. In the rare caseswhere this information was inconclusive, the URL of the blog was consulted, since organizational blogs are often hosted in the

organizational domain.

Jobdescription/type oforganization

# valuesassigned

2003

% values assignedout of total for

2003(163)

# valuesassigned

2005

% values assignedout of total for 2005

(481)

librarian/s 62 38.0% 152 31.6%

library 43 26.3% 199 41.4

unspecified 22 13.5% 35 7.3%

LIS student(s) (MLSor PhD), graduates

6 3.7% 14 2.9%

community (not allmembers arelibrarians)

5 3.0% 9 1.9%

Page 10: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 10/17

Table 3. Job description or type of organization of the bloggers in absolute numbersand percentages

informationprofessional,consultant, internettrainer

4 2.5% 11 2.3%

Web developer,programmer,technology worker

4 2.5% 10 2.1%

academic(s) 4 2.5% 6 1.2%

book business 4 2.5% 3 0.6%

library association 2 1.2% 8 1.7%

companies, centres 9 1.9%

library or informationnetwork

10 2.1%

library school 3 0.6%

other 7 4.3% 12 2.5%

Clyde (2004a), as a result of her survey conducted in July 2004, identified 198 library Weblogs. We do not know how many ofthese were active; however, it seems from data provided from an earlier survey that the list also includes blogs that were last

updated more than two months before the survey date (such inactive blogs were excluded by us). In the current search we

identified 209 library and library network Weblogs. This comparison seems to indicate that we are looking at a rather extensive listof library Weblogs, unless both studies overlooked a large number of them. Clyde (2004a) claimed that there is a gap between the

potential use of Weblogs by libraries and their actual use. Clyde (2004b) also published a book on Weblogs and libraries, where

she discussed Weblogs as sources of information and as tools for libraries to promote their services. The current paper, bycarrying out a content analysis of one month of postings of the blogs maintained by libraries and library networks (see below),

characterized the blog activities of these institutions and investigated the contribution of such blogs for promoting library services.

See section on Characteristics of postings of library blogs in February 2005.

Blogs can also be characterized by the length of time they exist, thus initiation date of the blog was recorded. For most cases thisinformation based on the earliest entry in the archive, sometimes we relied on the introduction to the blog or on references found

during our literature scan. The first entry in the archive is not always the initiation date of the blog, the blog owner might have

switched sites or blogging tools in the course of his/her blogging activity and it is possible that the blog was initiated earlier than thedate we recorded, however we had to work with the available data.

Figure 2 displays the distribution of the initiation dates of the blogs for the list of blogs identified in February 2005. The graph for

2003 is not displayed, since most of the blogs identified then are also included in the second list. The graph in Figure 2 shows a

monotonic increase in the number of blogs initiated during each period, except for 2005 for which data is missing, since datacollection took place at the beginning of the year. Six blogs were excluded from the chart, because we were unable to establish

their initiation dates. In 2004, 210 new blogs were set up; this number constitutes 45.5% of the total. If we consider only library

and library network blogs, then 114 library blogs (55.9% of the total) were established in 2004 and only 2.9% of them (comparedto 8.5% for all the non-library blogs) were established from the end of 2001. Here the percentages are out of the 204 library and

library network blogs for which he initiation date could be established. Thus, it seems that libraries entered blogosphere at a later

date than individuals, but currently there is a considerable growth trend in the number of such blogs. It remains to be seen whetherthis trend continues over time.

Here we see the overall picture; however, two opposite processes have to be taken into account: some users create new blogs

and start to publish their postings, while other users who are already blog-owners abandon their blogs: either these blogs become

inactive or are removed from the Web. According Henning (2003), about 66% of the blogs surveyed by them were not updatedin the last two months. Thus, it is highly probably that many more library and information science blogs were created in, say 2001,

than those appearing in the lists; since some of those created during that year already became inactive or abandoned by the time of

data collection.

Page 11: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 11/17

Figure 2: Distribution of the initiation date of blogs as of February 2005

Blog rankings

Next we considered how these blogs rank among themselves. Rankings in the blogosphere are usually based on the number of

links pointing to the blog, called inlinks. Counting inlinks is similar to counting the number of citations a scholarly publication

receives. The results are based on Technorati that tracks links between blogs, where both the source and the target of the link aremonitored by it. Thus the data is heavily influenced by the size and quality of the database. Technorati has a huge and continuously

growing database of blogs – in mid February 2005 it tracked a little more than seven million blogs and by the beginning of March,

2005 the number grew to more than 7.5 million. In the first round data from Daypop was planned to be used as well, but itprovided rankings only for 50 out of the 157 blogs, thus these rankings do not appear in the analysis.

Technorati '...is a set of Web services that track interconnecting links between blogs, allow people to find out who is linking to a

blog or a URL, ranked by authority and link freshness'.1 Technorati displays the number of blogs referring to the given blog,

which we call referring blogs. When counting the number of referring blogs, each blog that links to the given blog is counted withmultiplicity of one, even if several links from that blog pointing to the given blog exist. We were unable to find any information

regarding the timespan for which the inlinks were counted, but Technorati listed links that were created more than 300 days ago.

Some additional information regarding Technorati can be found in Sifry's alert, a blog owned by David Sifry, the developer ofTechnorati (Sifry 2003).

Blog title# referringblogs 2004

relative rank in2004

# referring blogs2005

relative rank in2005

The Shifted Librarian 517 1 886 1

Bookslut 362 2 730 2

Librarian Net 222 3 439 3

ResearchBuzz 183 4 253 7

Library Stuff 159 5 335 4

The Resource Shelf 138 6 314 5

LISNews.com 125 7 196 9

Bloug 70 8 174 11

Unshelved 61 9 6 142-146

Open Access News 59 10 151 12

Page 12: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 12/17

Table 4: Top ranking blogs in January 2004 and in February 2005

LibraryPlanet.com 49 11 62 20

Catalogablog 46 12 98 14

Peter Scott's Library Blog 45 13 192 13

Open Stacks 36 14 38 40-43

Commons-blog 33 15 78 17

Scholarly ElectronicPublishing Weblog

31 16 35 47

Blog Driver's Waltz 28 17-19 44 29

The Laughing Librarian 28 17-19 51 26

TeleReadBlog 28 17-19 72 18

Waterboro Library Lib blog 25 20 59 21-22

Better living throughsoftware

4 75-92 262 6

BeSpacific 13 37-78 210 8

Uthink Blogs at theUniversity Libraries

not listed 190 10

Judithviews 2 107-121 92 15

Caveat lector not listed 89 16

Free range librarian not listed 64 19

Table 4 displays the list of blogs whose relative rankings (ranking among the set of blogs we examined) were in the top ten based

on Technorati data from January 3, 2004, when Technorati tracked a total of 1,477,660 blogs and from February 21, 2005,

when it tracked 7,231,328 blogs. In January 2004, Technorati provided data for 139 out of the 157 blogs (89%) and in

February 2005 it tracked 346 out of the 468 blogs in the second list (74%).

Although there are differences in the rankings, the overlap in the top ten results between the two periods is considerable. Fourteen

blogs appear among the top twenty of both lists and the first seven in 2004 also appear among the top ten in 2005. The top tenblogs (with the exceptions of Bookslut, Unshelved and Uthink) in Table 4 provide mostly professional, library and information

science related information and general information; some of them occasionally add personal postings. Bookslut publishes literary

news, Unshelved publishes daily library-related comics strips and Uthink provides mainly administrative information.

Characteristics of postings of librarian blogs in November 2003

The content of all the postings published in November 2003 of all the blogs identified was analysed for all the blogs in the first list

(see Bar-Ilan 2004). This paper reports only the characteristics of the largest group: blogs maintained by librarians (sixty-twoblogs).

The distribution of the overall content for blogs maintained by librarians in 2003 is as follows: forty-two blogs (67.7% of sixty-

two blogs) were classified as topic-oriented, eighteen (29.0%) had mixed content (topic oriented and personal) and two blogs

(3.3%) were classified as other. By far the largest set was the set of topic-oriented blogs, thus we find that the overwhelming

majority of the librarian blogs convey only professional information.

In most of the blogs several forms of postings were identified, but the most prevailing form was short postings containing

hypertext links, fifty-one of the sixty-two examined blogs (82.3%) had such postings; 23 blogs (37.1%) had postings that wereclassified as essay type postings with hypertext links. The percentages do not add up, since several forms of postings can appear

in a blog. There was only one blog (1.6%) where none of the postings in November 2003 contained hypertext links. Thus we see

that the blogs maintained by librarians that were examined in this study form an integral part of the Web and their primary use is to

describe or relate to information published elsewhere on the Web.

Page 13: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 13/17

The major themes mentioned in the blogs were identified by examining the content of the postings of November 2003. The

distribution of the themes appears in Table 5.

Table 5: Distribution of the identified themes for blogs maintained by librarians, basedon postings in November 2003

Themeno. of blogs where the

theme appears% blogs in which the theme

appears (out of 62)

General 50 80.6%

Professional 46 74.2%

Superficially related tolibraries/librarians

16 25.8%

Local/administrative 15 24.2%

Personal/other 14 22.6%

A few, specific, recurring themes were published in November, 2003 among them rumours on the Google IPO, the Amazon

'search inside the book' feature, cancellation of Elsevier journals, the article on lost Internet references that was published in

Science, the settlement between OCLC and the Library Hotel and reports and impressions about the Internet Librarian

conference.

The distribution of the number of postings in November 2003 was highly skewed; it ranged between 0 (these blogs were non-active in November, but had postings in December) and 217. The average number of postings per month was 25.7, while the

standard deviation was 43.3; the median was 10 and the mode was 1. Note that the postings were counted manually, thus some

mistakes in the counts are expected. The three most prolific blogs in November 2003 in the first list were:

LISnews.comThe ResourceshelfPeter Scott's Library Blog

These highly prolific blogs are often mentioned in discussions of library and information science blogs (for example see the

references mentioned in the last paragraph of the Introduction above).

Commenting was enabled in only twenty-seven blogs (43.5%) and sometimes, although not often, a large number of comments

were posted following a specific blog posting. By enabling comments (and having the right readership that reacts) the blogsomewhat resembles forums, with the major difference that issues to be discussed are only introduced by the moderator—the

owner of the blog.

Characteristics of postings of library blogs in February 2005

As noted before, in the February 2005 list, there were 209 active blogs maintained by libraries and libraries networks. This is ahuge increase compared to the number of such blogs located in December, 2003 (43 blogs, 486% growth) and warranted further

examination. Alcock (2003) and Schwartz (2005) discussed the potential of Weblogs for libraries: they are excellent means for

disseminating news and information to the clients, the community and the staff. They can be used to report about local news, new

acquisitions and services and can also serve as a tool for in-house transmission of information. They are also a valuable marketing

tool, especially since libraries are usually short on financial resources. They also allow the clients to comment on the published

information.

Clyde (2004a), in an analysis of fifty-seven library Weblogs surveyed in September 2003, found that 'the most common use of thelibrary Weblogs was for providing news and updates for library users, particularly about print and internet resources; 44%

provided information about functions, activities and events in the library'.

The distribution of the values assigned to the general purpose of the blog category appears in Table 6. The value other was

assigned for one blog only, that was a blog about the local blogs at a university. 57.9% of the blogs provide mainly local

information, which is in line with the major objectives of library blogs should have according to the literature (Alcock 2003, Clyde

Page 14: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 14/17

2004a, Schwartz 2005). Comparing with the librarian blogs in the November 2003 list, only 15 out of the 62 blogs (24.2%) had

some content that could be defined as local/admistrative. Thus it seems that the main purpose of the librarian blogs is to

disseminate information on general and library and information science related topics, whereas the major purpose of library blogsis to provide local information.

Table 6: The general purpose of the library and library networks blogs as identifiedbased on information from February 2005

Purpose # blogs % blogs

Local information for clients 98 46.9%

Guide for clients 69 33.0%

Local information for staff 18 8.6%

Guide for staff 15 7.2%

Local information for clients and staff 6 2.9%

Guide for clients and staff 2 0.9%

Other 1 0.5%

Table 7: Distribution of the identified themes for blogs maintained by libraries andlibrary networks, based on postings in February 2005

Theme# blogs where

the themeappears

% blogs in which the theme appears (out of180 blogs that had at least one posting in

February 2005)

Local/administrative 151 83.9%

General 102 56.7%

Professional 37 20.6%

Superficially relatedtolibraries/librarians

7 3.9%

Personal/other 2 1.1%

The major themes of library and library network blogs were identified through a content analysis of a whole month of postings

(February, 2005). The results of the content analysis are displayed in Table 7. The content of the postings was analysed for 180

blogs only, because twenty-nine blogs had no postings in February 2005 (only postings in January). Comparing Tables 5 and 7,

one can see the differences between the librarian blogs (Table 5) and the library blogs (Table 7). Librarian blogs are mainly

concerned with general and professional information, while library blogs mainly provide local information. Libraries of all typesmaintain blogs. In our list 130 (62.2%) were academic libraries, sixty-one (29.2%) public libraries, ten (4.8%) school libraries,

five (2.4%) special libraries, and national and state libraries, three (1.4%). According to data from the National Center for

Education Statistics, in the US there were 3,923 academic libraries in 2000 (Carey, Justh & Williams 2003), 9,129 public libraries

in 2001 (Chute et al. 2003) and there were about 97,000 school library and media centers in 1999-2000 (Holton et al. 2004). A

plausible explanation for this finding is that the academic libraries and their clients are more advanced technologically than the other

types of libraries and their clients. If and when blogging becomes the norm for libraries the distribution will probably change.

Even for the academic libraries, we located active blogs for only about 3% of them. Unlike for blogs for the general audience,where there is no need for repetition of information (theoretically, all Web users may turn to a single information source), there is a

real need for an increase in the number of library blogs, since they mainly convey unique, local information.

In my opinion, among the most notable library blogs were the eighteen active blogs maintained by the reference librarians of the

Georgia State University Library. These blogs provide almost daily information in a wide range of areas of expertise and thus

fulfill the library's motto: 'Your source for research and learning'. These blogs offer general and subject specific information, with

only a small minority of the postings providing local information and thus they are valuable information sources also for readers that

are not affiliated with the Georgia State University. One of the oldest and most often mentioned (in the literature) and most highly

Page 15: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 15/17

linked (according to Technorati) library blogs is the blog maintained by the Waterboro Public Library. The Stark County LawLibrary Blawg provides extensive legal information . These blogs caught my eyes during content analysis and thus this list is

unavoidably subjective. Some of these blogs receive a high number of incoming links according to the data provided by

Technorati, thus they not only caught my eyes, but are also popular in the blogger community.

The number of postings to the library blogs in February 2005 ranged between 0 and 136 (for the Stark County Library Blawg),

with an average of 9.3 postings (standard deviation 13.8) and a median and mode of 5 postings. Note that these numbers are

much lower than the data for the librarian blogs in November 2003. Commenting was enabled (but rarely used) in 78 blogs

(37.3%). This percentage is only slightly lower than the respective percentage for librarian blogs in November 2003. Even thoughall of these blogs are affiliated to libraries, about half of them (104 blogs) were definitely maintained by a single person in charge,

50 blogs (23.9%) were maintained by multiple bloggers and we were unable to deduce this information for 55 blogs.

Conclusion

This paper presents an extensive analysis of a large set of English language library and information science blogs. The findings

indicate that librarian blogs can and do serve as new information channels both for the library and information science community

and for the general public. Some of these blogs provide valuable information, some in a telegraphic style (mostly by providing

links), others have longer pieces that include opinions on the issue mentioned. Some spice their postings with patron stories ordiscuss issues like the librarian action figure or add personal postings that provide insights to the world of the creator of the blog,

thereby enhancing the blog reader's experience. Some of the blogs have active readership as can be seen from the comments on

the postings. Library blogs, on the other hand, fulfill a different purpose, even though they also often publish general and subject

specific information, their main use is to provide local information and to advocate the use of the library and its resources.

The large number of blogs maintained by librarians and the information science professionals provide valuable information.

Currently, the main challenge is not to create more blogs, but to increase the awareness of those that already exist, which not onlyprovide valuable and easily accessible information for professionals, but also for the general public. We have to develop creative

ways to increase the readership of these blogs, perhaps through library newsletters or through links from library sites and

professional organizations using some kind of voting scheme to rank and classify the blogs or by exposing blogs at conferences or

simply by word of mouth.

The number of library blogs located by us in February 2005 was larger than the number of librarian blogs, but since the library

blogs mainly serve a different purpose (providing local information) from the librarian blogs, there is a place for every library to

maintain a blog. Over a fourteen-month period considerable growth in the number of library blogs was witnessed and I hope thatthis trend will continue as more and more libraries realize the advantages and ease of maintaining such blogs. Library blogs still

have a long way to go in terms of growth, but in terms of content, it seems that the existing blogs are well aware of their potential

and use the blogs to market the library and to provide valuable local and general information to their clients.

Note

1 from the metadata field "description" of the Technorati homepage as it appeared in January 2004

References

American Library Association (2005). Mission. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.ala.org/ala/ourassociation/governingdocs/policymanual/mission.htm

American Society for Information Science and Technology (1992). ASIST Professional guidelines. Retrieved 12

August, 2007 from http://www.asis.org/AboutASIS/professional-guidelines.htmlAlcock, M. (2003). Blogs – What are they and how do we use them? Quill, 103(8). Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://alia.org.au/groups/quill/issues/2003.8/blogs.html

Bar-Ilan, J. (2004). Blogarians: – a new breed of librarians. Proceedings of the American Society for Information

Science and Technology 67th Annual Meeting, 41, 119-128

Blogger (2004). About. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

Page 16: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 16/17

http://web.archive.org/web/20031014004157/http://new.blogger.com/about.pyra

Blood, R. (2000). Weblogs: a history and perspective. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html

Bausch, P., Haughey, M. & Hourihan, M. (2002). We blog: publishing online with Weblogs. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley

Publishing.

Carey, N., Justh, N. M. & Williams, J. W. (2003). Academic Libraries 2000, E. D. Tabs. Washington, DC: NationalCenter for Education Statistics. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004317.PDF

Chute, A., Kroe, E., O'Shea, P., Polcari, M. & Ramsey, C. J. (2003). Public libraries in the United States: fiscal

year 2001. E. D. Tabs. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003399.pdf

Clyde, L. A. (2002a). Weblogs and blogging. Part 1. Free Pint, no 111. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.freepint.com/issues/020502.htm#feature

Clyde, L. A. (2002b). Weblogs and blogging. Part 2. Free Pint, no 112. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 fromhttp://www.freepint.com/issues/160502.htm#feature

Clyde, L. A. (2003). Weblogs in the library and information science environment. Paper presented at the Online

2003 Conference. London Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://web.archive.org/web/20031203203524/http://hi.is/~anne/online2003.html

Clyde, L. A. (2004a). Weblogs and libraries: The potential and the reality. In Proceedings of Online Information

2004 (pp. 207-213), London, UK, December 2004. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 fromhttp://web.archive.org/web/20050412232302/http://www.online-

information.co.uk/2004proceedings/thursam/clyde_l.pdf

Clyde, L. A. (2004b). Weblogs and libraries. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Crawford, W. (2001). The E-Files: 'You must read this': Library Weblogs. American Libraries, 32(9), 74-76.

Crawford, W. (2005). Investigating the biblioblogosphere. Cites & Insights, 5(10). Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://citesandinsights.info/v5i10b.htmCrawford, W. (2006). Looking at liblogs: The great middle. Cites & Insights, 6(10). Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://citesandinsights.info/v6i10a.htm

Cohen, S. M. (2003). The "new breed" of library weblogs. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.librarystuff.net/new_archives/001026.html

Fichter, D. (2001). Blogging you life away. Online, 25(3), 68-71.

Fichter, D. (2003a). The blogging explosion. Libraries and weblogs. Paper presented at the Internet LibrarianConference, November 4, 2004. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://library.usask.ca/~fichter/talks03/il/2003.10.28.blogging.pps

Fichter, D. (2003b). Why and how to use blogs to promote library services. Marketing Library Services, 17(6).

Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from http://www.infotoday.com/mls/nov03/fichter.shtml

Garrett, J. J. (2002). The page of only weblogs. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.jjg.net/portal/tpoowl.html

Greenspan, R. (2003). Blogging by the numbers. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 fromhttp://web.archive.org/web/20050301232019/http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/software/article.php/1301_2238831

Holton, B., Bae, Y., Baldridge, S., Brown, M. & Heffron, D. (2004). The status of public and private school

library media centers in the United States: 1999-2000. E. D. Tabs. Washington, DC: National Center for

Education Statistics. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004313.pdf

Henning, J. (2003). The blogging iceberg. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://web.archive.org/web/20040805101020/http://www.perseus.com/blogsurvey/thebloggingiceberg.htmlKrippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis – an introduction to its methodology. (2nd ed.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

Publications.

MarketingTerms (2007). Blog. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from http://www.marketingterms.com/dictionary/blog/

Neuendorf, K. A. (2001). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Rainie, L. (2005). The state of blogging . Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved 12

August, 2007 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_blogging_data.pdfRubenking, N. J. (2003, December 30). Blog tools. PC Magazine. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,1403731,00.asp

Page 17: The Use of Weblogs (Blogs) by Librarians and Libraries to Disseminate Information

7/20/13 The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information

informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html?pagewanted=all 17/17

Price, G. (2003). Behind the scenes at the Daypop search engine, Part 2. Searchday, August 5, 2003. Retrieved 12

August, 2007 from http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/2236401

Sauers, M. P. (2006). Blogging and RSS: a librarian's guide. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

Schwartz, G. (2005). Blogs for libraries. WebJunction. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://webjunction.org/do/DisplayContent?id=767Sifry, D. (2003). Technorati tutorial, Part 1. Sifry's alerts. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000165.html

Weblog (2005). In Wikipedia. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?

title=Blog&oldid=110404496

Weil, D. (2003) Top 20 definitions of blogging. Retrieved 12 August, 2007 from

http://www.wordbiz.com/archive/20blogdefs.shtml

How to cite this paper

Bar-Ilan, J. (2007). "The use of Weblogs (blogs) by librarians and libraries to disseminate information" Information

Research, 12(4) paper 323. [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/paper323.html]

Find other papers on this subject

Scholar Search Google Search Windows Academic

Check for citations, using Google Scholar

Bookmark This Page

Web Counter

© the author, 2007.

Last updated: 18 August, 2007

Contents | Author index | Subject index | Search | Home