the use of remote sensing and gis for drainage management
TRANSCRIPT
1
The Use of GIS and Remote Sensing to Support Strategic Scenarios for
Agricultural Drainage in El Nubaria Area, Egypt.
Nahla A. Morad*, Salah M. Abdel Mogheeth* and Mahmoud M. Shendi**
* Hydrology Dept., Desert Research Center, Cairo.
**Soils and Water Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Egypt.
Corresponding Author: Mahmoud Mohamed Shendi
Tel: +20 2 38350837, Mobile: 0105350018, Fax: +20 84 6334964
E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The main objective of the present study is to support strategic scenarios
for agricultural drainage in the areas suffering from water logging problems in
the reclaimed soils located west of El Nubaria Canal. The slightly pervious
petrocalcic layers, the misuse of irrigation water, the seepage from canals, the
shallow effective soil depth and the absence of efficient drainage system in most
localities lead to a rising in groundwater levels to critical depths. Soil
degradation and decrease of soil productivity are common due to the resulted
water logging and salinization problems. In order to solve this complicated
problem, a new and untraditional drainage system must be proposed. To meet
the goal of the present study, Landsat TM images and ILWIS GIS were used.
GIS combined with remote sensing capabilities and the ground truth data,
proved to be efficient and effective means for the spatial inventory, analysis,
modeling, understanding environmental problems, planning and management of
the present drainage problem. Two scenarios were proposed to determine the
areas which seriously need a new drainage system. The scenarios were described
in details and supported with the resulted GIS maps. IT was concluded that the
depth to water layer and the hydraulic conductivity parameters are the most
effective parameters that govern the logging phenomena in the area followed by
the depth to impermeable layer and the water requirement. Drainage efficiency,
water salinity and soil salinity have the least impact on water logging in the
studied area, however decision makers should keep all the studied parameters in
consideration to propose alternative scenarios for improving drainage conditions
in the area.
Keywords: Remote Sensing, GIS, Agricultural Drainage Planning,
Hydrological Studies, El Nubaria soils.
1-INTRODUCTION
The study area is characterized by intensive reclamation activities since
1968, where surface flood irrigation is practiced through El Nubaria canal and
El Nasr canal. The area is located to the west of El Nubaria canal, as many of
reclamation projects are taking place. The area extends to the north of El Nasr
canal and bounded from north by Alam El Markab- Alam Shaltut limestone
2
ridges. It lies between latitudes 30° 40’ to 30° 50’ and longitudes 29° 50’ to 30°
02’and occupies an area of about 19650 feddan, (one feddan = 4200m2), Fig. 1.
The water level in the area is less than 1.0 m in the majority of the irrigated
soils. The common rising groundwater table problem has serious impacts from
both environmental and engineering viewpoints. Deterioration in the cultivated
soils and the decrease of their productivity are common feature due to water
logging and consequently, soil salinization.
The study area is almost flat with a very low relief and slopes gently to
the northeast direction. The altitude varies between 24 and 32 m above sea level.
To the north, the study area is bounded by an elongated, hard compact pink
limestone formation, which constitutes the eastern limits of El Markab- Shaltut
ridges. This limestone rock unit acts as a barrier for the flow of both surface and
ground waters. The area is characterized by different hydrological environments,
where deltaic calcareous littoral and lagoonal deposits dominate, (El Ghazawi,
1982(. Climatically, the mean annual rainfall is 57.8 mm; the maximum mean
daily temperature (34.0°C) recorded during July, while the minimum
temperature was recorded in January (7.5°C).
The present work aimed to study the water logging phenomenon in the
reclaimed lands located in the area lying to the west of El Nubaria Canal and to
propose different scenarios that can help for getting a new strategy for managing
agricultural drainage in the area.
Fig. 1. Location map of the study area and the studied piezometers.
3
2-MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty piezometers were drilled throughout the study area to study the
following: type of aquifer layers, shallow layers permeability, shallow layers
salinity, depth to water and fluctuation. The piezometers depths ranged between
2.3 to 6.8 m .The piezometers were monthly monitored during the period from
July 2002 to July 2003 for water table level and its salinity changes.
The location of the studied pizometers is given in Fig. 1. The absolute position
and elevation for all water points were determined using GPS (Leica GPS, SR
9500). Representative soil, rock and water samples were collected during
drilling of piezometers. The following analysis of the shallow aquifer layers;
- Infiltration rate was tested using double ring infiltrometer (Ponce, 1989).
- Permeability of saturated zone was determined using slug test method
(Watson and Burnett, 2000).
- Chemical analysis for more than 120 water samples from canals, drains and
deep wells were made to determine TDS, EC, pH, cations and anions.
- Chemical analysis of 30 soil past extracts to determine ECe, pH and soluble
cations, Richards, (1968).
- Calcium carbonate content, was determined volumetrically for the surface
layers of different Lithology using Scheibler’s calcimeter (Wright 1939).
- ILWIS 3.2 GIS was used to produce maps and models, ITC (2001).
- Three natural color composite of Landsat TM images, taken in June of the
years 1984, 1990 and 1999, were used to monitor the spatial distribution of
water logging problems. In addition, 6 bands of Landsat TM image of June
1997 is used to calculate the soil Wetness Index.
3-RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Evolution of cultivated area from 1984 to 1999
Visual interpretation was done on the natural color composite of Landsat
TM images for years 1984, 1990 and 1999. The calculated cultivated areas
within the studied images showed increases of 34.8% and 64.3% in the years
1990 and 1999 respectively in comparison with the cultivated area of year 1984
(Fig. 2&3) .It could be observed from the studied images that the greatest
expand in cultivated lands occurred in the area south of EL Nasr canal and
around Cairo-Alexandria desert road in both sides. New waterways were
constructed during this period (1984-1999) like branch no.20 and El Bustan
Extension canal. The increase of cultivated lands has led to a great increase in
the amounts of irrigation water used which actually caused considerable
increases in the water logged areas.
3.1.1 Visual interpretation of satellite images
Visual interpretation was carried out also for the three Landsat images to
determine the water logged areas during 1986, 1990 and 1999. Final conditions
for the water logged area and the improved areas for drainage are calculated as
shown in table 1 and Fig. 4.
4
Fig. 2. Development of cultivated soils in the study area.
. TM image of 1984. TM image of 1990. TM image of 1999.
Cultivated area = 117219 feddan Cultivated area = 157996 feddan Cultivated area = 192534 feddan
5
Fig. 3. Evolution of cultivated areas from year 1984 to 1999.
Table 1. Evolution of reclaimed areas (feddan) for the years 1984, 1990 and
1999 as interpreted from the Landsat images
Field investigations done by the authors in the study area during the present
work (2000 to 2004), showed that the area still suffering from serious water
logging problem in many places. It was also observed that the use of surface
irrigation in the study area has led to more waste water and, consequently,
caused the water logging and salinization problems partically in areas with
shallow peterocalcic or gypsyferous clayey layers.
Years Cultivated
area
Water
logged
area
Percentage
of water
logged area
Improved
area
Percentage of
improved
area
1984 117218.57 46995.5 40.10% - -
1990 157995.97 47799.1 30.25% 17458.2 11.0%
1999 192533.96 85224.2 44.27% 50319.7 26.14%
6
Fig. 4. Visual classification of water logged areas from 1984 to1999.
3.1.2 Calculation of soil Wetness Index from Landsat image
The Wetness Index (WI), is calculated from TM97 using the following equation;
WI = 0.1509Xband1 + 0.1793Xband2 + 0.3299Xband3 + 0.3406Xband4 –
0.7112Xband5 – 0.4572Xband7
It was observed from the resulted image that the water logged areas scored
values that range between 0 to -40, while the cultivated areas which do not
suffer from water logging scored positive values that ranged between 0 to + 20.
The non cultivated areas scored a wetness index values that range between -40
to -100. The resulted layer is stored in digital format and not presented in this
paper due to size limitation.
Faddan 3.68207
Faddan 736203
Faddan 263706
Faddan 77807
Faddan 6.35206
Faddan 625660.
Faddan 67.2807
7
3.2. Soil Chemical Analysis
Thirty soil samples were collected during drilling of the studied
piezometers to determine the basic soil characteristics as given in Table 2.
3.2.1. Soil salinity
As indicated in Table 2, the soil salinity values varied from non saline to
very strongly saline. The distribution of salinity values of the soil paste extract
shows a clear matching with the salinity pattern of shallow ground water, Fig. 5.
Table 2. Soil Analysis of saturated zone
Piezo_
meter
no.
Piezometer
Depth
(m)
ECe
(dS/m)
pH Soil
Paste
Soluble Cations
(meq/l) ESP
Top Layer
Na+ Mg
++ Ca
++ Lithology
CaCO3 %
P1 3.50 23 8.05 173.9 23.1 37.8 31.1 Petrocalcic crust
P2 5.70 9.9 8.07 56.5 7.4 34.7 14.5 Petrocalcic crust
P3 4.10 14.8 8.08 97.8 14.7 32.6 22.1 Petrocalcic crust 38.1
P4 3.00 17 8.23 132.6 9.5 27.3 30.7 Petrocalcic crust
P5 6.00 12.75 8.04 81.7 11.6 32.6 19.6 Petrocalcic crust 36.6
P6 3.85 7.8 7.67 22.6 8.4 46.2 4.87 Petrocalcic crust
P7 3.80 10.5 7.95 72.2 10.5 23.1 19.8 Calcareous Sand 21.3
P8 6.00 7.5 7.70 27.8 10.5 34.7 6.9 Sandy Clay 23.8
P9 3.60 40 8.12 304.4 34.7 52.5 40.0 Petrocalcic crust 32.1
P10 4.30 10 7.60 47.8 22.1 32.6 10.9 Calcareous Sand 19.3
P11 3.10 5.5 7.61 16.5 11.6 27.3 4.1 Loam 18.8
P12 3.70 4.18 7.76 10.9 6.3 23.1 2.8 Calcareous Sand 19.2
P13 4.60 3.2 7.97 10.0 7.4 13.7 3.2 Loam 20.6
P14 6.80 16.5 7.96 113.1 11.6 33.6 25.3 Loam 23.3
P15 3.50 30 8.06 239.1 23.1 41.0 37.9 Petrocalcic crust
P16 3.50 42 8.11 343.5 32.6 47.3 44.1 Petrocalcic crust 39.0
P17 4.50 8 7.78 35.7 10.5 34.7 8.9 Petrocalcic crust
P18 3.80 7 7.89 27.8 11.6 31.5 7.0 Calcareous Sand 18.8
P19 2.80 6 8.04 26.5 11.6 21.0 7.8 Petrocalcic crust 37.2
P20 2.30 5.3 7.65 17.83 7.4 27.3 4.8 Petrocalcic crust
P21 3.40 31.85 7.96 243.5 20.7 49.4 37.3 Loam 21.2
P22 4.35 9.5 7.98 47.8 45.2 35.7 8.9 Loam 23.0
P23 4.75 18.63 7.99 113.1 17.9 48.3 21.7 Sand 16.5
P24 6.10 3.5 8.52 7.0 3.2 25.2 1.4 Loam 20.0
P25 5.85 6 7.91 30.4 5.3 26.3 9.1 Petrocalcic crust 34.3
P26 4.78 8.05 7.95 42.6 7.4 31.5 11.5 Loam 23.8
P27 3.50 4.75 7.92 11.7 4.2 31.5 2.8 Sandy Loam 24.5
P28 6.00 2.6 7.94 13.5 5.3 7.6 6.2 Loam 17.8
P29 4.10 3.5 7.84 17.4 2.1 14.7 7.1 Loam 17.2
P30 5.15 1.75 8.16 7.0 4.2 5.3 3.3 Sandy Loam 17.5
8
3.2.2. Soil pH values
All the studied soil samples possess alkaline pH values that ranged
between 7.61 to 8.52. The calcareous nature of the study area may contribute in
such high pH values, whereas no clear relationship was recorded with the soil
salinity values R2 = 0.085.
3.2.3. Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP values were calculated from the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
values. Although the highly calcareous nature of all the studied soil samples,
approximately one third of the samples showed high calculated ESP values
which reflected the predominance of Na+ in soil paste extract. The ESP values
ranged between 3.3 and 44.1 with a clear positive correlation (R2 = 0.911) with
soil ECe values.
Fig. 5. Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) values of soil past extract.
9
3.3. Application of Geographic Information System (GIS)
3.3.1. Main hydrological characteristics maps
All piezometers locations were recorded using GPS, then imported to
ILWIS GIS as points map where all studied attributes were stored as a
geographic database. The main hydrological characteristics maps were produced
using the GIS interpolation capabilities, Figs 6, 7, 8& 9.
The results indicate that the infiltration rate is very low; it ranges between
0.22 m /day to 2.67 m/day, Fig 6. The dominance of petrocalcic layers is the
main reason for lowering permeability of the surface layers and hence,
minimizing the ability for surface drainage.
The permeability data indicate that values ranged between 0.023 and 2.52
m/day, Fig 7. It was noticed that the abundance of the clay deposits in the
eastern part of the study area minimized the value to a very low rate.
Depth to water periodical field measurements from September 2002 to
July 2003 indicated that the depth to water in summer season ranged between
0.41 m to 3.93 m from ground surface and between 0.36 m to 3.82 m in winter
season. In general, the recorded depth to water level for most of the studied
piezometers decreased in winter and increased in summer. The low rate of
evaporation in winter (3.52 mm/day in February) and high rate in summer (7.9
mm /day in July) may contribute in this phenomenon. As indicated in Fig 7,
water logging is common in the southern part (about 25 % of the study area) as
the recorded water level were less than 1.0 m. This could be due to the
application of flood irrigation system and the occurrence of impervious
gypsyferous clayey layer very close to the ground surface. In the northern part
(about 35% of the area) the recorded depth is also less than 1.0 m. The presence
of El Marqab- Shaltut ridges, as well as the applied flooding irrigation and the
low permeability of the deposits may contribute together in the logging
phenomena in this area. The middle parts of the study area, Fig 8, recorded
relatively deep water depth where drip and sprinkler irrigation systems are
common..
The concentration of TDS was measured in 30 groundwater samples that
collected from the shallow piezometers on monthly basis from July 2002 until
July 2003.The obtained salinity data of the shallow aquifer are presented in Fig
9, which indicated that the shallow aquifer was mostly saline to highly saline,
where the TDS ranged between 5000 and 43000 ppm.
3.3.2. Creation of Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
DEM layer is very important for studying drainage condition. Through
this layer one can simulates the 3D soil topography, soil slope and slope
direction which affect the flow direction in the surface layer. These maps are of
vital importance in modeling the water logging problem in the study area.
10
Fig. 6. Infiltration rate map of the study area
Fig.7. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated zone map.
0.023
0.08
5.72
0.895
0.485
0.812
4.14
1.98
2.52
152.5 Km
155 Km
160 Km
165 Km
170 Km
Cairo-A
lexandria Desert road
EL Nasr Canal
29°55'
29°55' 30° 00'
30° 00'
30°45'
30°45'
El M
arqa
b-Sh
altu
t rid
ges
30°50'
30°50'
SCALE
>2.5 m/day
2.0 - 2.5 m/day
1.5 - 2.0m/day
1.0 - 1.5 m/day
0.5 - 1.0 m/day
0 - 0.5 m/day
Legend
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
152.5 Km
155 Km
160 Km
165 Km
170 Km
Cairo-A
lexandria Desert road
EL Nasr Canal
29°55'
29°55' 30° 00'
30° 00'
30°45'
30°50'
30°50'
SCALE
30°45'
El M
arqab
-Shal
tut r
idge
s
>2.5 m/day
2 - 2.5 m/day
1.5 - 2 m/day
1 - 1.5 m/day
0.5 - 1 m/day
0 - 0.5 m/day
Legend
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
11
July 2003 February 2003 September 2002
Average 2002 - 2003
Fig.8. Depth to water in the shallow aquifer of the study area.
12
Fig.9. Salinity Map in the shallow aquifer of the study area.
Elevation
(m)
Fig.10. DEM map of the studied area.
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
P19
P20
P21
P22
P23
P24
P25
P26
P27
P28 P29
P30
P31
152.5 Km
155 Km
160 Km
165 Km
170 Km
Cairo-A
lexandria Desert road
EL Nasr Canal
29° 55'
29° 55' 30° 00'
30° 00'
30°45'
30°45'
E
leva
ted
Lan
d
(El M
arqa
b-Sh
altu
t rid
ges)
30°50'
30°50'
SCALE
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
< 5000 ppm
5000 - 1000 ppm
1000 - 15000 ppm
15000 - 20000 ppm
20000 - 25000 ppm
25000 -30000 ppm
30000 - 35000 ppm
>35000 ppm
Legend
13
Using ILWIS GIS software, all contour line and spot heights from four
topographic maps scale 1: 50000 (printed at 1994) named: Jabal Khasm El
Kaoud, El Nubaria, king Maryout and Abu El Matameir were digitized and the
DEM layer is created by interpolation capabilities, Fig. 10. This was followed
by producing digital forms of slope map and slope direction map. It is clear from
the DEM layer that the general surrounding elevation ranges between +130 m
above sea level in the south west to zero level in the north east, this will affect
the hydraulic gradient water flow direction to southwest-northeast direction.
Concerning the study area, the elevation ranges between +33.0 m and +25.0 m,
except Alam El Marqab-Shaltut ridges, where the elevation reaches +48.0 m,
Fig 10.
3.3.3. The use of GIS to construct decision maps for agricultural drainage
According to the field investigations done during the period (2000 –
2004) and from the data collected during the present work, it is clear that the
area is suffering from a severe drainage problem. In the present work, GIS was
used to determine the boundaries of the most deteriorated areas and to construct
a decision map showing priorities for improving the drainage condition.
Seven layers were used in the GIS analysis as follows: -
i) Depth to water level measured monthly in the field during one year (2002 –
2003) (Fig. 8). The depth to water ranges between 0.5 to 2.65 m .
ii) Infiltration rate map (Fig. 6). The infiltration ranged between 0.08 to 2.67
m/day .
iii) Depth to impermeable layer, calculated from the lithology of the drilled
piezometers (Fig. 11). The values were between 3.0 to 6.0 m.
iv) Drainage efficiency for the drains located in the study area. The range of the
drainage efficiency varied between 0.0% (stagnant water or dry drain) to 28.5%
(Fig. 12). The drainage efficiency was calculated as a ratio between the
measured discharge of the drain in the field (Qm) to the designed discharge of
the same drain (Qd).
Drainage efficiency (%) = (Qm / Qd) x100
v) Average water requirement for irrigation (Fig. 13). The values were estimated
according to the type of irrigation used, i.e. for surface irrigation, the average
water requirement ranges from 5000 to 6000 m3/fed/year, while for modern
irrigation, the values ranges between 4000 to 5000 m3/fed/year.
14
vi) TDS for the water samples collected during the field trips for one year (2002
-2003). The TDS values ranged between less than 5000 ppm to more than 25000
ppm.
vii) TDS of soil paste extract for the samples collected during the drilling of
piezometers . The range varied between less than 5000 ppm to more than 25000
ppm.
From the above mentioned layers, two scenarios were applied to determine the
area which seriously needs a new drainage system as follows: -
- First scenario is to determine the most deteriorated area in the area by logic
overlaying of all the layers without applying any relative weights.
- The second scenario is to get a specific weight for each class in the layer
according to its importance.
Description for each scenario and the results obtained are given as follows: -
I) First Scenario (Overlay Operation): -
Logic overlay operation is used to determine the most deteriorated areas in the
study area. Seven bit maps were used in the logic overlay, each of them was
created using logic IF statement with the following parameters: -
- Depth to water less than 1.0 m
- The infiltration rate less than 0.5 m/day
- Depth to impermeable layer ranges between less than 4.0 m
- Drainage efficiency less than 20%
- The irrigation requirement from 5000 to 6000 m3/feddan/year
- The TDS of water samples is more than 15000ppm
- The TDS of soil paste extract is more than 15000 ppm
The result of the first scenario is given in Fig. (14) which indicate the following;
i) The most deteriorated area lies in the north west of the study area, very close
to the elevated ridges (Alam El Marqab- Alam Shaltut ridges), where the
impervious littoral (marine) and lagoonal deposits are dominated.
ii) The resulted area equals 1460 feddans which is very small compared with the
actual water logged area noticed during the field studies. In other words, this
area doesn't represent the whole actual logging condition in the area, but only
the most deteriorated part.
16
Fig. 13. Average water requirements (m
3/feddan/year).
Fig. 14. Extremely deteriorated area (Scenario 1).
17
II) Second Scenario (Overlay By Relative Weights): - The second scenario is to make additive arithmetic overlay for all the layers
after using a certain weight for each class in the layer. The weight factor used is
shown in Table (3). The resulted map has a maximum value of (7) which
correspond to the most deteriorated area and a minimum value of (1.4) which
correspond to the most well drained areas.
The resulted map of this scenario is classified into three classes as shown in Fig.
(15). The characteristics of the areas covering each priority are summarized in
Table 4, which indicate that the area of high priority needs an immediately new
and untraditional drainage system in order to reduce the deterioration caused by
water logging such as soil salinity and the low productivity. By overlaying the
drains network over the most deteriorated area, one can detect the ineffective
drains as described in Table 4.
Table 3. Weight factor of deterioration for relevant layers
Deterioration
Weight
Layer
1.0 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20
Water table depth
(m) < 1.0 1.0 –1.5 1.5 -2.0 2.0 –2.5 > 2.5
Hydraulic
Conductivity (Ks)
(m/day)
< 0.5 0.5 - 1.0 1.0 – 1.5 1.5 – 2.0 >2.0
Depth of impermeable
layer (m) < 2.0 2.0 – 4.0 4.0 – 5.0 5.0 – 6.0 >6.0
Drainage efficiency
(%) 0.0 –10 10 - 20 20 – 30 30 - 40 40 - 50
Irrigation requirement
(m3/ fed /year) 5000 - 6000 4000 - 5000 <4000
TDS in water samples
(ppm) > 25000
15000 -
25000
5000 -
15000 2000 -5000 <2000
TDS in soil paste
extract (ppm) > 25000
15000 -
25000
5000 -
15000 2000 -5000 <2000
18
Table 4. Characteristics of the area covering priority classes for drainage management (Scenario 2).
Priority Class
Layer
Weight Drainage
conditions Location
Area
(feddan)
Area
% Type of irrigation
Type of
surface
deposits
Existing
drains
High Priority 0.90 - 1 Worst North-west
part 7940 40 Surface irrigation
Impervious to
slightly
pervious
Drains 1, 2, 3,
4 and 7
Moderate
Priority 0.70 - 0.90 Bad
Middle and
south east
part
11200 56.7
Modern irrigation in
the middle (7170 fed)
and Surface irrigation
in the south east
(4030 fed)
slightly
pervious to
moderately
permeable
Drains 5, 6, 8,
9, 10, 11,12,
13 and 14
Less Priority 0.50 - 0.70 Slightly
good
South-east
part 600 3.3
Modern irrigation
(drip and sprinkler)
moderately
permeable Drain 11
19
Fig. 15. Priority classes for drainage management (Scenario 2).
In order to determine the most effective parameters in water logging of
the area, the seven layers mentioned in the above mentioned scenarios were
plotted in a two dimensions table in such a way one of the parameters assigned
0.4 weight factor while the six remaining factors assigned each 0.1 as a weight
factor. This was followed by additive overlay for the seven resulted layers, then
classified to three priority classes and compared with the priority map indicated
in Fig 15. The calculated matched areas with the high priority class are arranged
in descending order.
By applying the aforementioned scenarios and comparing the field realty,
it can be concluded that the depth to water layer and soil permeability
parameters are the most effective parameters that govern the logging phenomena
in the area followed by the depth to impermeable layer and the water
requirement. Drainage efficiency, water salinity and soil salinity have the least
effects on the water logged in the area, however decision makers are
recommended to keep all the studied parameters in consideration for alternative
scenarios. The second proposed scenario (based on relative weight overlay)
could help in planning periodic improvement priorities among water logged
areas.
The applied GIS modeling was very helpful to propose different scenarios
for drainage improvement priorities in the study area. The methodology is
recommended to be applied in similar environmental studies.
20
الملخص العربي
السيناريوهات لدعم استخدام الاستشعار عن البعد وأنظمة المعلومات الجغرافية النوبارية ، مصر. ف الزراعي في منطقةصر الإستراتيجية لل
*نهلة مراد ، *صلاح عبد المغيث ، ** محمود محمد شندى * قسم الهيدرولوجى ، مركز بحوث الصحراء
كلية الزراعة ، جامعة الفيوم ** قسم الأراضى والمياه ، شندى : محمود محمد الناشر
6334964 2084+، فاكس: +02025052201: محمول ، 38350837 202+تليفون: [email protected]البريد الإلكتروني:
ستراتيجية للصرف الزراعي في المنا الإات سيناريوهالعم هو دالهدف الرئيسي للدراسة الحالية ترعة غر الواقعة فى من ة الأراضى المستصلحة في الغداقة وسوء الصرف مشكلة منعاني التى ت
يتم مزاولة ، حيث 8691عام من الاستص كثيف لعمليات من ة الدراسة بنشا . وتتميز النوبارية، كفاءا استخدامسوء النوبارية وترعة النصر. ون را ل ترعةخ ل منس حي الر بالغمر ال ، ماء الر
عم التربة الفعال وغيا ن ام ن ص ، الر من قنوات وجود ب ات كلسية ملتحمة قليلة النفا ية ، الرشح الأعما في مستويات المياه الجوفية إلى زيادا إلى من المنا ذدى ل ريفي كث الكفءالتصريف . التملح للتربةومشاكل غداقة التربةبسب يتها إنتاج ت تربة ون صان معدلامما ذدى إلى تدهور الالحرجة.
هدف الدراسة ن ام صرف جديد غير ت ليدى . ولتح ي إنشاء ولحل ه ه المشكلة المع دا فحن ي تر وقد ذوضحت . ILWIS GISوبرنام و Landsat الأقمار الصناعية صورف د تم استخدام الحالية
فعالة الوسائل الدراسة ذن إدمار قدرات ذن مة المعلومات الجغرافية والاستشعار عن البعد يعتبر من الدارا مشكلة الصرف بالمن ة بيئية المشاكل الفهم ت، تحليل، عر ، للمشكلة المكاني للحصر وتخ ي وادفعال يتناس ن ام صرف جديد إلى شده التي تحتار باالمنلتحديد ان هيو سينار وقد تم اقترا الحالية.
بأن مة المعلومات عمت بالخرائ الناتجة بدق ودالسيناريوهات وقد تم وصف . مر روف المن ةرا على وقد بينت نتائ ه ه الدراسة ذن عم الماء الأرضى ونفا ية التربة هى ذكثر العوامل تأثي .الجغرافية
اهرا الغداقة بالمن ة ، ويتلو ل فى الترتي عم ال ب ات الغير منف ه وكمية ماء الر ، بينما كانت على غداقة المن ة ، وبالرغم تأثيراكفاءا المصارف وملحية كل من التربة والماء الأرضي ذقل العوامل تى تم دراستها فى الإعتبار من ذجل من ل فحن يوصى لمتخ ى ال رار ذن يضعوا جمير المعايير ال
وضر جمير البدائل لتحسين الصرف وت ليل الغداقة فى من ة الدراسة.
21
REFERENCES
El Ghazawi, M.M. (1982). “Geological studies of the Quaternary-Neogene
aquifer in the area Northwest Nile Delta”, M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of
Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
ITC, (2001). “ILWIS 3.0 Academic User Guide”, International Institute for
Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The
Netheralands.
Ponce, V.M. (1989). “ Engineering Hydrology, Principles and Practices”,
Prentice Hall, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Richards, L.A. (1968) “Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils”, Oxford
& IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India. Watson, I. and Burnett, A.D. (2000). “Hydrology, an environmental
approach”. Lewis Publishers, U.S.A.
Wright, C. H. (1939). Soil Analysis. Thomas Murby and Co., London.