the university of connecticut · competition and monopoly the university of connecticut. ... is...

20
E i Economics 1000 Essentials of Economics Essentials of Economics 1 RICHARD N. LANGLOIS MODULE 6: MODULE 6: COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut

Upload: dinhque

Post on 01-May-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

E i Economics 1000Essentials of EconomicsEssentials of Economics

1

R I C H A R D N . L A N G L O I S

M O D U L E 6 :M O D U L E 6 :

C O M P E T I T I O N A N D M O N O P O L Y

The University of Connecticut

Page 2: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Competition as a process.

A popular meaning of ‘competition’

2

A popular meaning of competition is playing to win.When economists use the termcompetition they mean a state of affairs.

A large number of buyers and A large number of buyers and sellers.Full information.Sellers produce a homogenous product.C tl bilit f Costless mobility of resources.

Page 3: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Competition as a process.3

But real-world competition is a pconstant adjustment process.process.

Illustration: shoppers iti t th h k twaiting at the checkout.

Page 4: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

The pressures of competition.

Sellers.

4

Face a downward sloping demand curve.

Price > opportunity cost, which invites competition from rivals.

Example.

Slice of pie costs 50 cents to produce.

Vendor sells the pie for $1.50.

Page 5: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

The pressures of competition.

P D

5

$1.50 Price

.50

Q

Cost

Q

Page 6: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

The “margins” of competition.6

Price.

Quality.

Cost.

Innovation

Page 7: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Creative destruction.7

“[T]he problem that is [T]he problem that is usually being visualized is y ghow capitalism administers existing structures

Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883-

1950) author of

existing structures, whereas the relevant

bl i h i 1950), author of Capitalism,

Socialism, and Democracy (1942)

problem is how it creates and destroys them”y y

Page 8: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Creative destruction.8

“… competition from the new commodity, the new … competition from the new commodity, the new technology, the new source of supply, the new type of organization (the largest-scale unit of control for instance) — competition which commands a decisive ) pcost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the margins of the profits and the outputs of the existing firms but at their foundations and their very lives. Th k d f h ff

Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883-

1950) author of

This kind of competition is as much more effective than the other as a bombardment is in comparison with forcing a door, and so much more important that it becomes a matter of comparative indifference 1950), author of

Capitalism, Socialism, and

Democracy (1942)

that it becomes a matter of comparative indifference whether competition in the ordinary sense functions more or less promptly; the powerful lever that in the long run expands output and brings down prices is in y long run expands output and brings down prices is in any case made of other stuff”

Page 9: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Creative destruction.9

Page 10: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Monopoly.p y

Two systems of belief about monopoly

11

Two systems of belief about monopoly.

Spontaneous monopoly.“N t l t d ” f “Natural tendency” for monopolies to arise and persist.Need for active antitrust policy.

Interventionist monopoly.Competition tends to eliminate

p y

market power unless there are structural barriers.True monopoly is a creature of p ythe state.

Page 11: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Monopoly.

Sources of monopoly

12

Sources of monopoly.

• “Natural” monopoly.• Because of economies of scale,

only one firm “fits” in a market.• Example: cable TV.p b• Example: network effects and

software.But franchise bidding• But: franchise bidding.

• But: which stages of production have the economies of scale?

Page 12: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Monopoly.

Sources of monopoly

13

Sources of monopoly.

• Ownership of a scarce input.• DeBeers and diamond mines.

i h• A property right to exclude.

P t t d i t ll t l • Patents and intellectual property rights.

• The Postal Monopoly statute.

Page 13: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Taxi medallions.14

Average Annual Medallion Prices 1947, 1950, 1952, 1959, 1960 and annually since 1962. Source: Schaller Consulting.

13,257 medallions

Page 14: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Taxi medallions.15

$/medS

P22

P1 D′

D

13,257 # medallions

Page 15: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Taxi medallions.16

13,257 medallions

Si th t t f 2008 hil Since the start of 2008, while the stock market was going through its worst decline through its worst decline since the Great Depression, the price of a corporate p pmedallion has jumped 28%, to $766,000; the price of an i di id l h i % individual one has risen 33%, to $572,000.

Source: USA Today

Page 16: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Analysis of monopoly.

Fi ’ d d i h k d d

17

Monopolist chooses Qm to make d l bi

$/Q• Firm’s demand curve is the market demand curve.

producer surplus as big as possible.

• Demand curve Pm

cost

determines monopoly price Pm.

D

cost

Q/tQm

Page 17: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

Analysis of monopoly.

• Not true that a monopolist

18

$/Q

• Why? Suppose monopolist lowers price

• Not true that a monopolist can set “any price it wants.”

Why? Suppose monopolist lowers price.

Loss in revenue from lowering price to existing (inframarginal)

P1

P2

Gain in revenue from

existing (inframarginal) customers.

attracting new customers.

No price

Q/tQ1 Q2

No price discrimination.

Revenue is P*Q

Page 18: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

What’s wrong with monopoly?

A competitive industry would drive price

19

A competitive industry would drive price down to cost, implying an output of Qc.$/Q

Producer surplus (profit) would be zero• Producer surplus (profit) would be zero.

• Shaded area is consumer surplusCS

costP

• Shaded area is consumer surplus.

D

costPc

Q/tQc

Page 19: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

What’s wrong with monopoly?

Monopoly restricts output and raises price

20

Monopoly restricts output and raises price relative to the competitive benchmark.$/Q

• Some consumers’ surplus becomes d ’ l ( fit)CS producer’s surplus (profit).

Pm• Is this what is wrong

with monopoly?

CS

costP

with monopoly?

Transfers of surplus can be regressive or

PS

D

costPc regressive or progressive.

Q/tQcQm

Page 20: The University of Connecticut · COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY The University of Connecticut. ... is playing to win. ... Microsoft PowerPoint

What’s wrong with monopoly?21

Monopoly restricts output and raises price $/Q

• As a result some potentially beneficial CS

Monopoly restricts output and raises price relative to the competitive benchmark.

As a result, some potentially beneficial gains from trade don’t take place.

Pm• Total surplus is diminished by the

CS

costP

p yextent of the deadweight-loss triangle.

Total (social) surplus

PSDWL

D

costPcota (soc a ) su p us

is CS + PS.

Q/tQcQm