the twitter #2016#olympics bid

8
1 The Twitter #2016 #olympics bid by Ana Adi University of the West of Scotland October 21, 2009 Just some weeks ago, the chic, vibrant and charming city of Copenhagen in Denmark became for a few days an Olympic capital. Members of the IOC, presidents of states, popular figures of show‐biz, inspiring athletes, inquisitive journalists, Olympic fans, and young researchers have flooded the city to witness and take part in the historical gathering of the Olympic Congress but even more to witness the fierce competition between the four city contenders to the title of host of the 2016 host of the Olympic Games: Chicago, Madrid, Tokyo and Rio de Janeiro. Like with all bids, the final presentation was a highly anticipated moment. For the competing cities the final presentation is the moment of the final pitch, the final touches, a moment when planning, visions, expertise, clarity, empathy, marketing, branding, persuasion, surprise have to meet in 10 minutes of fine mastery and win not only the Games, but conquer imaginations and hearts. It is the moment to show that a city is ready for the Olympic challenge and is worthy to welcome the Olympic world. Like in previous years, the cities organized mass parties at home where supporters and critics alike gathered to share the moment of glory or sadness. In previous years the result would be seen on television, if the IOC press conference was covered live. This year, the news travelled faster. This year, the chatter and the party were not confined to a geographical place anymore. Moreover, the voice of supporters of the candidate cities that didn’t display an obvious liaison with them by residency or birth, could be heard online simultaneously with those of local supporters and critics. Furthermore, this year, in a move unprecedented in Olympic history, the presentations, the observations, the questions as well as the complete works of the Olympic Congress and the IOC Session were all on display, live, and online. While the webcast from Copenhagen was showing the final presentations, reactions to what was being said, implied, addressed or shown could be seen on Twitter 1 almost immediately. As a platform, Twitter is presented under the category of micro‐ blogging due to its limitation of user messages to 140 characters. But Twitter can also be considered to some extent both as a social network for professionals as well as 1 http://www.twitter.com

Upload: ana-adi

Post on 21-Mar-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

An essay on the twitter chatter and coverage of the voting for the 2016 Olympic host from a communication perspective.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

1

TheTwitter#2016#olympicsbidbyAnaAdiUniversityoftheWestofScotlandOctober21,2009Justsomeweeksago,thechic,vibrantandcharmingcityofCopenhageninDenmarkbecameforafewdaysanOlympiccapital.MembersoftheIOC,presidentsofstates,popularfiguresofshow‐biz,inspiringathletes,inquisitivejournalists,Olympicfans,andyoungresearchershavefloodedthecitytowitnessandtakepartinthehistoricalgatheringoftheOlympicCongressbutevenmoretowitnessthefiercecompetitionbetweenthefourcitycontenderstothetitleofhostofthe2016hostoftheOlympicGames:Chicago,Madrid,TokyoandRiodeJaneiro.Likewithallbids,thefinalpresentationwasahighlyanticipatedmoment.Forthecompetingcitiesthefinalpresentationisthemomentofthefinalpitch,thefinaltouches,amomentwhenplanning,visions,expertise,clarity,empathy,marketing,branding,persuasion,surprisehavetomeetin10minutesoffinemasteryandwinnotonlytheGames,butconquerimaginationsandhearts.ItisthemomenttoshowthatacityisreadyfortheOlympicchallenge

andisworthytowelcometheOlympicworld.Likeinpreviousyears,thecitiesorganizedmasspartiesathomewheresupportersandcriticsalikegatheredtosharethemomentofgloryorsadness.Inpreviousyearstheresultwouldbeseenontelevision,iftheIOCpressconferencewascoveredlive.Thisyear,thenewstravelledfaster.Thisyear,thechatterandthepartywerenotconfinedtoageographicalplaceanymore.Moreover,thevoiceofsupportersofthecandidatecitiesthatdidn’tdisplayanobviousliaisonwiththembyresidencyorbirth,couldbeheardonlinesimultaneouslywiththoseoflocalsupportersandcritics.Furthermore,thisyear,inamoveunprecedentedinOlympichistory,thepresentations,theobservations,thequestionsaswellasthecompleteworksoftheOlympicCongressandtheIOCSessionwereallondisplay,live,andonline.WhilethewebcastfromCopenhagenwasshowingthefinalpresentations,reactionstowhatwasbeingsaid,implied,addressedorshowncouldbeseenonTwitter1almostimmediately.Asaplatform,Twitterispresentedunderthecategoryofmicro‐bloggingduetoitslimitationofusermessagesto140characters.ButTwittercanalsobeconsideredtosomeextentbothasasocialnetworkforprofessionalsaswellas 1 http://www.twitter.com

Page 2: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

2

ahighlycustomizedinformationfeed.Twitterisathecommunicators’favouritebecauseitenablesthemtoshareinformationinstantaneously,connectimmediatelywithpeoplewithwhomtheyhavesimilarinterest,receivefeedback,findnewinformationandtrackandmeasurealmostinrealtimehowtheinformationflows,howtrendsareformedandhowopinionsareshaped.Duetoitspopularity,Twitter,morethananyotherweb2.0platform,isthecentreofamyriadofapplications.Someallowausertocheckitsinfluencewithinitssphere,otherspermitcheckingthecontentthatgeneratesnewfollowers,andotherscompiledataandcreatecustomizedstatisticsreports.Infewwords,Twitterisadisseminationandlisteningtoolpopularamongadultusersofbothgenders.Unlikesocialnetworkingforexamplethatrequirestheusertobuildaprofiletothensharewithfriends,Twitterrequiresminimalinformationfromitsusersandallowsmembersto“follow”otheruserswithoutrequiringthemtofollowback.Twitterisasmuchaboutthenumberoffollowersonehasasabouttheperceivedqualityofinformationshared.Unlikeonsocialnetworkswheretherelationshipbetweenusersneedstobereciprocal,onTwitterthelisteningandthetalkingcanbe

virtuallyseparated.Furthermore,Twitter,morethansocialnetworkscanprovideinsightintoprocesseslikeinfluencingandbrandendorsement.Itisthereforeobviousthatbiddingcitiescommunicationstrategistswouldembarkonthisnewmediuminthehopesofreachingspecializedaudiencessuchasthoseofsportsjournalistsorsponsorsormorediffusegroupssuchasthoseofsupporters.ButforTwittertobesuccessfulasacommunicationtool,itneedstobeintegratedwithintheoverallcommunicationstrategyorfortheOlympiccitiesthisisyetdifficulttoassess.However,howcitiesusedTwittertopromotethemselves,generatebuzzorinformtheirfollowersaswellashowmuchinterestthe2016bidcompetitionraisedamongthetweeple2canbedonethankstoaapplicationsreadilyavailable.Butfirst,alookateachcity’saccountisessentialasitrevealsnotonlyhowpopularonTwittereachcontenderisbutalsotowhatextenttheaccountisusedfordialoguewiththeirfollowers.AtthetimeofthefinalpresentationChicago(@chi2016)had5394followers,RiodeJaneiro(@vivasupaixao)had2642,Madrid(@madri2016)had189whileTokyo(@tokyo2016)hadonly134.Incomparison,theIOCtwitteraccount(@olympics)launchedtocoincidewiththeOlympicCongress 2 tweeple = Twitter people

Page 3: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

3

hadhad3339followers.Allaccounts,exceptRio’s,wereinEnglishtheassumptionthatcouldbemadefromherebeingTokyoandMadridwereaimingtouseTwitteraspartoftheirinternationalcommunication.Chicago’suseofEnglishhadadoubleadvantage–itreachedlocalpublicsaswellasinternationalones.Rio’sPortuguesetweetsontheotherhandshowedthecity’sinterestincommunicatingwiththepeopleathome,ratherthanwiththoseofthewholeworld.Nevertheless,judgingsolelyfromthenumbersofrecordedfollowers,Chicagohadtheadvantageofhavingthegreatestreachpotentialandthereforethehighestinfluencerposition.

Figure1‐YahooPipes3–

ChicagoTwitterFollowersdistribution

3 http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/

Figure2‐YahooPipes–Rio

deJaneiroTwitterFollowersdistribution

Figure1and2showthegeographicaldistributionofTwitterfollowersforChicagoandRio.ChicagomanagedtoattracttheattentionmostlyfromitsfellowAmericansaswellassomeofCanadianneighbours.ThisshowsthatChicago’sTwitterpresencewasofmoreinteresttoaNorth‐Americanmarket,theinternationalreachbeingconsiderablysmaller.ForRio,incontrastwithitstargetingdonebyusingPortugueseratherthanEnglishforitsmessages,itsreachwasmorediversified,moreinternational.Despitethesmallerfollowercrowd,thiscouldhavebeenasignpointingtoRio’sstatusaspreferredcontenderonaninternationalscale.AfurtheranalysisofthenatureofthetweetscouldrevealwhetherthiswasindeedthecasebutatthispointthedatathatIhaveisinsufficienttopursuethisresearchopportunity.

Page 4: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

4

TweetEffect4isanapplicationthatanalyzesanaccount’sactivitybasedonitstweetsanditcanbeusedbyanyonetoresearchanyaccountaslongasitknowsitsID.Theapplicationusesonlyinformationavailableinthepublicdomain,thetweets,andcorrelatesitwiththenumberoffollowersacquiredorlostthatcoincidedwithapostedmessage.Finally,itcompilesthedatainachartshowingtheaccountsfluctuationoverthelast200tweetsandhighlightsinalowertablethemessagesthatwonorlostfollowers.Whencheckedtheactivityofeachofthebidcitiesaccounts,TweetEffectshowsthatallbidaccountshavebecomesuddenlystaticasthefinalpresentationsneared.Thisisnotaboutthecommunicationsteamsshiftingfocustothefinalpreparationsandthereforenothavingthetimetotweet.Thiscouldaboutacompletestopingainingorlosingfollowersoringainingasmanyasloosing.Withothertwitteraccountshowevergrowingsteadilyandwithinnertwitterpromotionmechanismssuchas#followfridaywhenusersrecommendtheirfollowerstofollowotheruserstherebyendorsingthem,itishardtobelievethatallbidingcitiesreachedsimultaneouslythisstaticstatus.Suchsaturationthereforecanonlybeexplainedasacombinationlackofupdates 4 http://www.tweeteffect.com

comingfromthebiddingcitiesaccounts,alackofdialoguebetweenfollowersandacrystallizationofeachaccount’sobjectivesandaimswithintheTwittersphere.With1updatecomingfromMadridand2fromTokyoitishardlysurprisingthattheiraccountactivityisstatic.ButwithhundredsofupdatescomingbothfromChicagoandRiodeJaneiro,isitstillunclearwhatmadetheseaccountstostopfluctuating.Sofar,the2016biddingcitiesgetdividedintoactiveuserslikeChicagoandRiodeJaneiroandpassiveuserslikeMadridandTokyo.Itistheactiveuserstherefore,muchmorethanthepassiveonesthatcantellastoryabouthowTwitterwasusedasacommunicationtoolandshedlightonthebenefitssuchatoolcouldrevealforfuturebidders.Assaid,Twitterisaboutinteractionasmuchasitisaboutsharinginformation.Beingfollowedisthereforeasimportantasfollowingothers.Itprovidesuserswithabalancebetweentalkingandlistening.IntheTwittersphereonlyfewusersenjoyahugefollowingwithoutneedingtofollowback.Theseaccountsusuallybelongtopeopleorcompanieswithverypublicprofilesactivatinginshowbiz,sports,politicsorbusiness.Twitteretiquetterequiresthusthatusersfollowothersinreturn.Foranewlylaunchedaccountfollowingbackisan

Page 5: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

5

essentialsteptowardsfollowers‐basegrowth.Notfollowingbackatallitisconsideredmostofthetimetobeeitherasignignoranceorofamonologicalentity.Fromthebiddingcities,theaccountsofChicagoandRiodeJaneiroofferagoodproportionoffollow‐backsmostoftheusersmakingthelistbeingfromdomainsofinterestforthecontestantstothetitleofOlympichost,beingdevotedfollowersorbeingcelebritiesthatcouldofferanincreasedexposurepotential.AmongthepeopleChicagofollowsareOprahWinfrey,JohnLegen,VenusWilliams,HughHefnerandIvankaTrump.OnRio’sside,PauloCoehlo’sstrongendorsementisperhapsoneofthemostnotableataninternationallevel.ThedifferentiationsbetweenChicagoandRiocontinuetohowtheyemployedtheplatform.Bothcitiesshowedagoodunderstandingofmigro‐bloggingbyusingshortenedbuttrackableURLs,acknowledgingsourcesofinformationthroughre‐tweets,answeringtousersorusinghashtags.AccordingtoTwitterAnalyzer5bothChicagoandRioreachedtheirtweetingpeakonthedayofthefinalpresentations,Octoberthe2nd,withtheperiodoftheOlympicCongressmarkingtheirstrongestactivity.However,adirectobservationofeachaccountrevealsstarkdifferences.During 5 http://twitteranalyzer.com

theOlympicCongress@chi2016wouldsendout2‐3updatesadayincludingduringOctober2nd.Ontheotherhad@vivasuapaixaohadnolessthan17tweetsonthesamedayfollowingcloselytheemotionandexcitementofwaitingforthevotingresults.Inthisrespect,Rio’ssincere,highlyexclamativetweets,half‐completedsentencesorinconsistenthashtaggingareclosertoexploitingcorevalueofmicro‐blogging:immediacy.Figure3showsthesubjectsoutputforChicagoprovidedbyTwitterAnalyzer.Chicagotalkedamongothersaboutitself,abouttheIOCwebsiteandMayorDaley.ItalsoheavilypromotedtheFunRunitorganizedinCopenhagenasawaytomarkitspresenceinthecityandemphasizeoncemoreitspowertobringpeopletogethertocelebrateOlympism.Anditthankeditsfollowersalotindirectlypointingtotheimportanceoftheirsupport,bothfortheteaminCopenhagenaswellasforthebidingeneral.

Figure3–TwitterAnalyzer–

@Chi2016SubjectsDiversifiedsubjecttalkisagoodstrategyiftheaimistoappealto

Page 6: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

6

variousgroupswithintheaccount’sfollowers.Thepropagationofimageisthereforelayeredandtheresultismultifaceted,diverseandcomplex.Thisinvitesinterpretationandenablesdialogue.Includinganidentifyinghashtagcanpushtheeventinthebuzzingandtrendingtopicscompiled.Trendingtopicsareobtainedthroughkeywordvolumecalculations.Themoreoftenahashtagisused,themorepopularitgets,thereforethemorepotentialtoinfluencefurtherTwittertalkithas.PlatformslikeTwitScoop6orTrendistic7arespecializedindoingjustthat.asRioused#Rio2016inconsistently.Nevertheless,itcanassumedthatbyusingthehashtagthecitywasaimingtoincreaseitsvisibilitybytriggeringmorevisitorsandfollowerstoitsstream.OnOctoberthe2nd2009Obama,OprahandBidwereamongTwittertrendingtopics.Rioemergedasabuzzingwordonlytowardstheendofthedaywhenitwasannouncedasthewinnerofthe2016race.AccordingtoTwitter,thebattleseemedtobebetweenChicagoasfavouriteandRioasapowerfulcontender.Theresult,asseen,hasbeeninfavourofRiodeJaneiroandsawChicago,theperceivedfavourite,excludedinthefirstroundofvoting.AsurgeintweetsaboutChicagohappenedaround4PM,thetimewhenChicago’s

6 http://www.twitscoop.com 7 http://trendistic.indextank.com

exclusionfromtheracewasannounced,whileoneaboutRiofollowedtwohourslater.Therisecoincideswithanotherriseabout2016andOlympicsandadrasticfallaboutChicago.Figure4depictsthisevolution.

Figure4–Trendistic–ComparisonoftweetsvolumeforOlympics,2016,Rio,Madrid,Tokyoand

ChicagoduringtheOctober2,2009

Attheendoftheday,RiogotTwittertalking,Rio2016surpassingbyfaranyothertalkabouttheOlympicsorthe2016bid.Riomayhavenothadthebiggestfollowingbutitswinningcertainlybroughtittheattentionofawinner.

Figure5–TweetVolume–tweetsvolumeforOlympics,2016,Rio,

Madrid,TokyoandChicagoduringtheOctober2,2009

Page 7: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

7

Ofcourse,thevolumeofcontentgeneratedbyRioonTwitter,andbyeverybidcompetitorforthatmatter,isfarsmallerthancomparedwithwhattraditionalmediainbothitsonlineandofflineformshavecreated.Similarly,thenumberofpeoplefollowingeithercityisstilllimitedcomparedtothehundredsofthousandstheycouldreachviatelevisionforexample.However,unlikethepromiseofapotentialreach,theTwitterfollowersarepeopleinterestedinacity’sbidandwillingtoreceiveupdatesaboutit.Onthesametoken,theiroutputs–tweetsandre‐tweets–areintentionalanddirectedtospecializedaudiences.HavingobservedhowChicagoandRiousedTwitteritishardatthispointtosaywhichcityhadthebetterapproach.RioisobviouslythewinnerbythevoteoftheIOCmembersbutitsuseofTwitterisequallyremarkablewiththatofChicago’s.IftakingintoaccountthattheIOCbidevaluationcommissioniscommissioningasurveyforeachbidcandidatetofindoutthepopularsupportofaitsbid,havinglocalfollowersisveryimportant.BothChicagoandRiohaveachievedthatusingdifferentmethods.IfconsideringtheinternationalappealoftheGamesanditsmissiontoattractbiggerandwideraudienceswitheveryedition,thanRio’sinternationalappealisthekey.ButsuchappealisnotobtainedusingTwitteralonebutratherresultsfromamixof

communicatedpromises,assumedidealsandprojecteddreams.Itmightbethat,forthe2016bid,Riohadthebettermix.InthecasesofTokyoandMadrid,thechoiceofTwitterlooksdictatedbyfashioninthesensethattheyseemtohaveembracedthemediumjustbecauseofitspopularityandhypesurroundingit.WhileTokyomighthaveothermicro‐bloggingplatformsmorepopularthatTwitter,thecitycouldhavestillusedthelattertoconnectwiththeJapanesediasporaaswellaswithTokyofans.InthecaseofMadrid,betterresearchintoTwittercouldhaverevealedwhetheritistherightplatformforthecity’sbid.AswithTokyo,MadridcouldhaveusedTwittertoengagewithinternationalaudiencesofsupporters,media,academicsorsponsorsanduseinparallelplatformsandtacticsprovenmoresuccessfulwiththelocalpublics.ForthisfirstTwitterOlympics,thecitiesfollowersweretheretohighlightapotentialforfuturebidderstoharnessthepowerofnewmedia.Italsoshowsthatmicro‐blogginglikeanyothernewmediatoolneedstobeintegratedintheoverallbidstrategy.Furthermore,socialmediashouldbeusedinthefutureforitsinteractionpowerasmuchasforitsviraleffectsthroughoutallthestagesofthebidandinparticularthroughtheearlystageswhen

Page 8: The Twitter #2016#olympics bid

8

popularsupportandproofofitareneeded.Nowthatthebiddingfewerislonggone,Rio’stwitteraccountcontinuestothriveandcurrentlycountsmorethan7,500followers.Theothercitieshavestoppedtotweetbuthaven’tdeletedtheaccountseither.Infact,theyhaveturnedinyetanotherchanneltogivethankstothosewhosupportedthemintherace.

Figure6–Madrid’sThankYoulink

fromTwitterbio