the time machine

1
The time machine The audience in the time machine is relatively the same as it was in king kong because there are no videos or dvd’s so people can’t watch it at home so they have to see it in the cinema. So the audience is people that go to the cinema. The same amount of people roughly go to the cinema in the 1960’s as they did in the 30’s because to see films like the cinema you would have to go to the cinema as you couldn’t watch it on tv because no one would broadcast it. The only difference is the audience might be more defined by genre then in the 30’s. The budget in the time machine is even bigger then it was in king kong. The budget is about 33% bigger but that is because the technology used in the time machine is more advanced so it cost more then the technology that made the animation for king kong. The budget for the animation is big like in king kong because there are still millions of people going to the cinema to watch the films so the industry is making a lot of money to be able to produce high budget films. The technology used in the time machine is more advanced then the technology used in king kong because king kong was made several decades later when more advanced technology was invented. The animation technique used in the time machine was a bit like pixilation. As in the time machine it showed flowers, candels, and people changing over time. This technology was really advanced for its era as it was only recently invented. The effect of time changing was done by people taking lots of photos of objects or people changing or moving over a long period of time when they were played in quick succession e.g. when the flower was growing that would of taken 3 months or so but each time the flower changed a picture was taken until there was about 50 pictures and there all played in succession so the fps builds up to make it appear as it was moving. The place of exhibition for the time machine was the cinema and only the cinema as dvd or vhs hasn’t been invented. The exhibition won’t have any effect on the quality of the animation because the budget would still be the same as it would more then likely only be made for the cinema but it could have some effect because if it was made for tv they wouldn’t of used the technology they did because it would have been to expensive but it is very unlikely that it would of.

Upload: rebecca-shackley

Post on 12-Mar-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

time machine

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: the time machine

The  time  machine    

The  audience  in  the  time  machine  is  relatively  the  same  as  it  was  in  king  kong  because  there  are  no  videos  or  dvd’s  so  people  can’t  watch  it  at  home  so  they  have  to  see  it  in  the  cinema.  So  the  audience  is  people  that  go  to  the  cinema.  The  same  amount  of  people  roughly  go  to  the  cinema  in  the  1960’s  as  they  did  in  the  30’s  because  to  see  films  like  the  cinema  you  would  have  to  go  to  the  cinema  as  you  couldn’t  watch  it  on  tv  because  no  one  would  broadcast  it.  The  only  difference  is  the  audience  might  be  more  defined  by  genre  then  in  the  30’s.  

The  budget  in  the  time  machine  is  even  bigger  then  it  was  in  king  kong.  The  budget  is  about  33%  bigger  but  that  is  because  the  technology  used  in  the  time  machine  is  more  advanced  so  it  cost  more  then  the  technology  that  made  the  animation  for  king  kong.  The  budget  for  the  animation  is  big  like  in  king  kong  because  there  are  still  millions  of  people  going  to  the  cinema  to  watch  the  films  so  the  industry  is  making  a  lot  of  money  to  be  able  to  produce  high  budget  films.    

The  technology  used  in  the  time  machine  is  more  advanced  then  the  technology  used  in  king  kong  because  king  kong  was  made  several  decades  later  when  more  advanced  technology  was  invented.  The  animation  technique  used  in  the  time  machine  was  a  bit  like  pixilation.  As  in  the  time  machine  it  showed  flowers,  candels,  and  people  changing  over  time.  This  technology  was  really  advanced  for  its  era  as  it  was  only  recently  invented.  The  effect  of  time  changing  was  done  by  people  taking  lots  of  photos  of  objects  or  people  changing  or  moving  over  a  long  period  of  time  when  they  were  played  in  quick  succession  e.g.  when  the  flower  was  growing  that  would  of  taken  3  months  or  so  but  each  time  the  flower  changed  a  picture  was  taken  until  there  was  about  50  pictures  and  there  all  played  in  succession  so  the  fps  builds  up  to  make  it  appear  as  it  was  moving.    

The  place  of  exhibition  for  the  time  machine  was  the  cinema  and  only  the  cinema  as  dvd  or  vhs  hasn’t  been  invented.  The  exhibition  won’t  have  any  effect  on  the  quality  of  the  animation  because  the  budget  would  still  be  the  same  as  it  would  more  then  likely  only  be  made  for  the  cinema    but  it  could  have  some  effect  because  if  it  was  made  for  tv  they  wouldn’t  of  used  the  technology  they  did  because  it  would  have  been  to  expensive  but  it  is  very  unlikely  that  it  would  of.