the three ws of consolidation and competition in us health care

32
The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care Martin Gaynor E. J. Barone Professor of Economics and Health Policy Heinz College Carnegie Mellon University Big Health: Consolidation and Competition under the Affordable Care Act American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., March 1, 2013

Upload: minty

Post on 24-Feb-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care . Martin Gaynor E. J. Barone Professor of Economics and Health Policy Heinz College Carnegie Mellon University Big Health: Consolidation and Competition under the Affordable Care Act - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health

Care

Martin GaynorE. J. Barone Professor of Economics and Health PolicyHeinz CollegeCarnegie Mellon University

Big Health: Consolidation and Competition under the Affordable Care ActAmerican Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., March 1, 2013

Page 2: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

2

High and Egregious Pricing Practices

A Bitter Pill to Swallow

Page 3: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

3

Introduction• Purpose of talk– Introduce you to basic facts about

consolidation and competition in US health care, understand the issues, drivers, consider policy approaches.

• Organization of Talk: “W W W”–What?–Who Cares?–What Can We Do About It?

Page 4: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

4

What?

Page 5: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

5

What?• Health spending

– High and increasing.• Can’t be sustained without serious strain/harm.• Hospital and physician services are ~9.2% of GDP.

• Prices– High, egregious billing practices.– Prices are a major driver of health spending increases.

• Quality– Concerns over quality.

• Innovation, Efficiency, Service– Health system characterized as sclerotic, unresponsive,

uncreative. • Consolidation

– Lots of consolidation (hospitals, physicians, insurers).

Page 6: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

6

Not a New Problem

by Andy Warhol~ 1985-86Available via Christie’s$15-20,000

Page 7: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

7

It’s The PricesComponents of Health Spending Growth, Private ESI Insurance, 2010-2011

Page 8: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

8

Once More, With Feeling

*Source: Hartman et al., Health Affairs, January 2013, 32(1): 87-99

Page 9: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

9

Quality Problems• Institute of Medicine– “The U.S. health care delivery

system does not provide consistent, high-quality medical care to all people.”

– “At least 44,000 people, and perhaps as many as 98,000 people, die in hospitals each year as a result of medical errors that could have been prevented …”

Page 10: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

10

Hospital Consolidation• There has been a tremendous amount of consolidation in the• hospital industry.

– Mergers and Acquisitions.• Over 1,000 deals 1994-present.• Consolidation slowed in 2000s, but has picked up recently.

• Hospital Market Concentration.– Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index (HHI): sum of squared market shares.– Average MSA level HHI.– 1992 - 2,440; about like a market with 4 firms of equal size.– 2006 - 3,261; about like a market with 3 equally sized firms.– FTC/DOJ cutoff for highly concentrated market { HHI = 2,500.– In 2006, 75% of MSAs were highly concentrated.

• Why Did Hospitals Consolidate?– Response to rise of managed care.– Anticipation of ACA?– Game of “musical chairs.”

Page 11: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

11

Insurer Consolidation• Insurer Consolidation.

– Information not as good as for hospitals, but better than for physicians.

• Large Employer Market.– 1998: HHI = 2,172; about like a market with 5 firms of equal size.– 2006: HHI = 2,956; somewhere between a market with 3 and 4

equally sized firms.– Average insurance market is highly concentrated after 2004.– Concentration starts increasing after 2002 (compared to mid to

late 1990s for hospitals).• Small Group Market.

– Market share of largest carrier has been increasing over time (33%– 2002; 47% 2008).– 87% of states had five firms controlling 75% or more of the market– in 2008; 56% in 2002.

Page 12: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

12

Physicians, “Vertical” Consolidation• There is not nearly as much information about consolidation

in the physician market as there is for hospitals.– Size of Physician Practices.

• Practices getting larger.• County HHI for physician practices 4,430 (CA, 2001).

• Vertical Consolidation– Physicians-hospitals; Insurers-providers.– A great deal of interest in physician-hospital consolidation in– particular.– Most forms of physician-hospital integration peaked in the mid-

1990s (e.g., PHOs), and have declined steadily since then.– The exception is the employment of physicians by hospitals, which

has been growing steadily.– Lots of talk about this kind of integration, little in the way of hard

#s.– ACOs

• 428 now; 164 in 2011.• More growth expected.

Page 13: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

13

The Affordable Care Act• ACA retains basic structure of US health

care system– Therefore, markets have to work.– Exchanges need competition.– Provider markets need to be competitive.

• For all segments: ESI, exchanges, Medicare, Medicaid,…

• ACOs– Organizational innovation?– Anticompetitive sham?

• FTC/DOJ rules.

Page 14: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

14

Who Cares?

Page 15: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

15

Who Cares?• US uses a market system for providing

care and for financing ~50% of it.• Therefore we need markets to work as

well as they possibly can.• If not, we pay.– Higher prices.– Lower quality.– Poor service.– Inefficient, outmoded means of organizing

and delivering care.

Page 16: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

16

In Their Own Words, or Hospital Executives Say the Darndest Things

• “Cleveland Clinic Diagnoses Health-Care Act “ Wall St. Journal, December 19, 2012– WSJ: “You are consolidated in the Cleveland area. Do you use that

leverage in negotiating prices with health insurers?”– Dr. Cosgrove: “Yes, we do. We also consolidate services and drive

efficiency of services across this organization. We've consolidated our hospitals. We've consolidated cardiac surgery, pediatrics, rehab, psychiatric care, obstetrics, to bring them together and have higher quality and lower cost, more efficiency.”

– WSJ: “Has that translated into lower prices that you charge to private insurers?”

– Dr. Cosgrove: “No. But we know that the payer is going to pay us less [in the future], so we're getting ready.”

• So Do Financial Analysts (“Fitch: Supreme Court Merger Ruling Could Hurt For-Profit Hospitals,” by Ron Shinkman, Fierce HealthFinance, February 25, 2013)– "Simply put, less industry consolidation means decreased pricing

power for hospitals," Fitch said.

Page 17: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

Empirical Evidence – Hospital Prices• Competition decreases prices (US,

Netherlands).– Mergers lead to price increases of 3.5-53 percent.– Magnitude largely depends on availability of

close substitutes• Summit-Alta Bates (Bay Area): 28-44% price increases

due to merger.• French-Sierra Vista (San Luis Obispo): Price increases

up to 53% due to merger.– Hospitals that have or acquire market power are

able to charge higher prices on a permanent basis.• 100% pass-through to consumers.

17

Page 18: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

Empirical Evidence – Hospital Quality

• Administered Prices (U.S. Medicare, England)– Competition increases quality (reduces mortality).

• Substantial impacts – 1.46 percentage points lower mortality rate in least concentrated markets for Medicare heart attack patients.

• Similar magnitudes in England.• English NHS reforms increased responsiveness of hospital choice

to hospital quality. • Market Determined Prices

– Impacts on quality mixed, but mostly positive (U.S., England, the Netherlands).

• Effects on quality appear to be long lasting.• Not much is known about non-mortality aspects of

quality– Waiting times, MRSA rates unaffected (England)

18

Page 19: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

Empirical Evidence – Hospitals, Not-for-Profit, Costs

• Not-for-Profit/Public Firms– One might think NFP or public hospitals would behave

differently.• Little evidence that they do so (US).• Hospitals respond to competition (US, England, Netherlands).

• Costs– Efficiencies due to merger possible.

• Little evidence that they are achieved (US, England).• Vertical Integration

– Efficiencies possible, anticompetitive impacts possible.• Little evidence of efficiencies (US), mixed evidence on price

(US).

19

Page 20: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

20

Empirical Evidence – Physicians, Insurers

• Physicians– Not a lot of evidence - some that prices are

higher in more concentrated markets.• Insurers– Evidence that insurance premiums are

higher in more concentrated markets (large employers).

– Evidence of substantial market power in the Medigap market.

– Evidence that competition has a large effect on premiums in Medicare+Choice.

Page 21: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

21

Empirical Evidence – Vertical Relations

• Physician-Hospital Integration– Price - 2 studies; opposite results.– Cost, Quality - little evidence of any impact.

• Countervailing Power– Some evidence that insurers in concentrated

markets pay lower prices to providers.– But, evidence that they also charge higher

premiums.• ACOs = Anti Competitive Organizations?– No evidence yet, too new.– Some cause for concern due to past behavior.

Page 22: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

22

Who Pays?• If health care prices increase due to

consolidation, who pays - insurers? employers? or consumers?

• CONSUMERS– Evidence shows that increased health

benefit costs to employers are passed on to workers in reduced pay (or lower increases), greater cost sharing of premiums, or reduced benefits.

Page 23: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

23

What Can We Do About It?

Page 24: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

24

Policy Goals, Framework• Overall Goal– Let markets work, encourage

responsiveness, innovations.• Framework– Set up rules of the road and enforce them.– Support an environment that supports

competition.– Need.

• Basic conditions.• Ongoing oversight.

Page 25: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

25

Policy Options – Supply Side• Vigorous Antitrust Enforcement (it’s hard to

unscramble and omelet)– Mergers– Anticompetitive Conduct – Safe Harbors

• Use with care. – Countervailing Power

• Two wrongs don’t make a right. • Facilitating Entry (no artificial barriers to entry)

– Entry can take care of problems due to consolidation. – Avoid foreclosure. – New entrants, existing forms.– New entrants, new forms.

Page 26: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

26

Policy Options• Demand Side Policies– Tax Policy

• End the exclusion of employer-sponsored health insurance.

– Selective Contracting. – Tiering/Narrow Networks.– Consumer Information/Transparency. – Consumer Engagement.

• Rate Regulation – If markets have become too concentrated. – But, doesn’t remove need for competition for

quality, service.

Page 27: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

27

Growth of High Deductible Health Plans

Page 28: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

28

Expanding the Market - Adding Competitors

• Wal-Mart next year will cover cardiac and spinal surgeries for more than one million U.S. employees and dependents through bundled payment agreements with six hospitals, including Cleveland Clinic and Mayo Clinic. October 12, 2012. (http://www.advisory.com/Daily-Briefing/2012/10/12/Wal-Mart-six-hospitals-launch-bundled-payments)

• PepsiCo Inc. last week announced a "rare" bundled payment agreement with Johns Hopkins Hospital that will allow its employees to travel to Baltimore for certain complex surgeries. Dec. 12, 2011. (http://www.advisory.com/Daily-Briefing/2011/12/12/Pepsi-Johns-Hopkins-bundled-payment)

• Lowe's, Cleveland Clinic hit 'home run' with bundled payment deal. October 26, 2010. (http://www.advisory.com/Daily-Briefing/2010/10/26/Lowes-Cleveland-Clinic-hit-home-run-with-bundled-payment-deal)

Page 29: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

29

Consolidation - Hospitals• Over 1,000 hospital mergers since mid-90s• Most urban areas are now dominated by 1-3 large hospital

systems

Page 30: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

30

Hospital Consolidation, 2• Large change in

concentration of hospital market shares.– Like moving from

market with 5 equal size firms to one with 3 equal size firms.

– FTC/DOJ cutoff for “highly concentrated” – HHI 2,500.

Page 31: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

31

Hospital Consolidation, 3• Most MSAs are

highly concentrated.

• Most MSAs have become more concentrated.

Page 32: The Three Ws of Consolidation and Competition in US Health Care

32

Insurer Consolidation