the swaziland experience in the changing eu … · the swaziland experience in the changing eu...
TRANSCRIPT
The Swaziland Experience in the Changing EU Environment
Nick Jackson, Managing Director Royal Swaziland Sugar Corporation
RSSC in Swaziland
Sugar to Swaziland (2006)
• Contributed 18% of national output
• Employs 35% of the agricultural workers
• Produces 650,000+ tonnes from 50,000ha of irrigated land
• Consistently ranked in the Top 10 lowest cost producers in the world
• Poised for major expansions in both the North and South
Issues facing Swaziland (2006)
• Appreciation of local currency
• High levels of unemployment and poverty
• Low economic growth
• HIV/AIDS reaching alarming proportions estimated at 42.6% of adult population is HIV positive
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
HIV Prevalence
Pacific Exchange Rate Service
Sugar in Swaziland
• Annual rainfall around 600mm (Nov-Mar)
• All cane grown under irrigation – Flood, sprinkler, pivot and drip
• Harvesting over 33 weeks
• Average replant is 9 years
• Varieties mainly from SA
• 3 sugar factories (5.1m tc) – Simunye (1.9), Mhlume (1.3m)
and Ubombo (1.9)
• VHP raws, DC VHP, refined sugar and Molasses
SWOT Analysis
STRENGTHS
• Efficient cane production
• Technically efficient sugar mills
• Premium markets for sugar
• Member of SACU
• Single desk selling of sugar and molasses
• Support of small holder growers by Government
WEAKNESSES
• Increasing costs of production of cane and sugar
• Weak smallholder growers
• High cost of transportation
• Rising electricity costs
SWOT Analysis
OPPORTUNITIES
• Additional market access to the EU
• Increasing world market prices
• Productivity and efficiency improvements
• Potential for co-generation into the national grid
• Increasing oil price and bio-fuels
THREATS
• Falling prices in EU and SACU markets
• Small holder growers exiting the industry
• Strong local currency
• Trade liberalization and preference erosion
Expected Socio-Economic Impact
• 36% cut in price from 2005-2009
– Estimate €39.8m loss of revenue
• EU sugar revenue accounts for 30% of total industry revenue
• Due to dilution from other markets, expected revenue loss is 20%
• Gross margin/ha to drop from about US$337 to approx. US$80 for small scale growers
• Fear that small growers cannot service debt
Expected Socio-Economic Impact
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
RSSC Ubombo
Employment Reduction
Previous Current
• More than 3,000 workers retrenched
• Reduced revenues impact social funding
• Scaling back health care services and facilities
• Reduced funding in education
Sugar Industry Adaptation Strategy
Sugar Industry Adaptation Strategy was produced.
Key areas for support:
• Institutional support for implementation
• Support for social services
• Support to improving productivity of small growers
• Infrastructure improvements (farm to mill)
• Diversification into alternative products
• Cross-cutting issues (gender, HIV, environment)
National Adaptation Strategy
Key areas of support distilled into a Multi-annual Indicative Programme (MIP) 2007-10 which acted as a guide for EC support. Total allocated to Swaziland was €74.9m (project support)
Strategic objectives: • Improvements for viability of small growers • Bring alternative model for the provision of social services
provided by Sugar Industry • Reduced transport costs through infrastructure • Diversification into other crops/activities
National Adaptation Strategy
The MIP was operationalized and financing planned
Project Funding
Support to small growers in irrigation equipment, land prep & business management
€25.0m
Improvement of transport infrastructure (farm to mill) €21.0m
Restructure social services delivery and provide transition services €11.0m
Support for economic activities for retrenched employees/growers €6.0m
Establish trials and pilot projects to test alternative agriculture €5.0m
Establish Restructuring & Diversification Management Unit (RDMU) €4.7m
Ensure continued coordination of accompanying measures after RDMU
€1.0m
Issues with implementation
• First three years the EU committed to funding only one programme per year, due to:-
– HR constraints on the part of the EU delegation
– More difficult operating from Lesotho
– Caused extended timeframe for routine transactions
– Resulted in the loss of €11.1m from 2009 and 2010 allocations
Issues with implementation
Deployment of MIP funding not consistent with urgent priorities set by the industry
A few examples:
• Focused on improving roads and bridges benefiting new growers, not existing growers
• Support for restructuring social services was front loaded by the industry, back loaded by the EU
• Creating of RDMU supposed to speed up implementation but RDMU took long to set up
Issues with implementation
A few more examples:
• Industry wanted targeted upgrading of rural roads, EU favoured larger road and bridge infrastructure that was administratively easier
• Resulted in roads with a lower direct cost saving being implemented with minimal sugar traffic
• Industry wanted existing industry structures to be used for implementation (Mills), rejected by the EU
• Many rules around implementation of projects which exclude many of the better contractors/suppliers
Achievements
• 2,423ha of land developed
• 39.3km of strategic road network under tarmac, 6km rehab of gravel roads and 3 high level bridges completed
• Grant to SCGA operationalized
• Rehabilitation of bulk water infrastructure of Malkerns canal and Mhlume siphon 4
• Capacity building for small growers in governance and business skills
• EU mission in Swaziland
• MIP2 grants able to be implemented by Mills
Implemented Projects
Siphon 4 at Mhlume
Haulage road – Mananga to Sihhoye
RSSC Overview
• Royal Swaziland Sugar Corp. was formed in 1979
• Merged with Mhlume Sugar Company in 2001
• Employs 1,700 permanent and 2,500 seasonal and casual employees
-
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
Profit After Tax
RCL Foods 27%
Tibiyo Taka Ngwane 53%
Gov of Swaziland 6%
Coca Cola 2%
Other 2%
Gov of Nigeria 10%
RSSC History
Mhlume Mill Simunye Mill Mhlume Refinery Simunye Distillery
RSSC & MSC Merge RSSC
Est
MSC Est
Mhlume Refinery Est
Simunye DistilleryEst
Mananga Sugar Packers Est
Royal Swaziland Sugar Corporation
RSSC Adaptation
• Cane yields & sugar production increased
• McKinsey brought in to review strategy
• Cost reduction projects initiated
90
95
100
105
110
115
Cane Yields (tcha)
• Integrated Growth Plan developed
• Office of Strategy Management implemented
• Balanced score card to track new strategy
Future for RSSC
• Expand through Integrated Growth Plan, once drought abates
• Continuously improve operational efficiencies
• Install power plants at Simunye and Mhlume
• Lobby for more strategic water storage
• Expand further, once dams constructed
• Lobby for restructured sugar industry
• Continuous drive to reduce unit costs along with sensible diversification
Strategic Map
Summary
• EU regime change has brought risk, as well as opportunities for Swaziland and RSSC
• All stakeholders pulled together, EU came on board
• Project support was more punitive than budget support
• Sugar Milling companies have adapted and implemented initiatives
• Growers are much slower to accept change
• Future is uncertain
Inspiration
It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most
responsive to change
Charles Darwin
THANK YOU