the stress effects of caffeine and ethanol on arabidopsis wild type and mutant strands
DESCRIPTION
The stress effects of caffeine and ethanol on Arabidopsis wild type and mutant strands. By: Kristin Watkins, Lindsay Baum, and Kylie Dickson Monarch High School. Research Question. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The stress effects of caffeine and ethanol on Arabidopsis wild type
and mutant strands
• By: Kristin Watkins, Lindsay Baum, and Kylie Dickson• Monarch High School
Research Question• What are the stress effects of caffeine and
ethanol on Arabidopsis wild type and mutant strands (RDR6 and DCL4)?
HypothesisHypothesis• We believe that the strain type of Arabidopsis will be affected
adversely by stresses such as alcohol and caffeine.• If a wild type, DCL4, or RDR6 Arabidopsis plant is exposed to
caffeine, then its growth will be stunted; its stem will be shorter and leaves less abundant and full.
• If a wild type, DCL4, or RDR6 Arabidopsis plant is exposed to ethanol, then the ethanol will dry out the plants and affect the life cycle.
BackgroundBackground• Arabidopsis strands• Dicer-like ribonucleases
fourth gene silenced (DCL4)
• RNA-dependent RNA polymerases six gene silenced (RDR6)
• Wild type
BackgroundBackground• How RNAi works• RNA interference is a regulatory process where small non-coding RNA
molecules inhibit gene expression thus silencing the gene. • RNAi stops gene expression at the stage of translation or by stopping the
transcription of specific genes.• This is because siRNA have matching nucleotide sequences to the target
RNA stand. SiRNA then “cleave” the messenger RNA, breaking it down so the protein is untranslatable.
BackgroundBackgroundRole of RNAi• Role in development, virus resistance and
stress response• May be used to silence parts of cell to help
identify areas necessary for a particular gene expression and response
• Promising tool in biotechnology, medicine, and could help lead to curing diseases by silencing the protein responsible
BackgroundBackgroundHow this relates to our project• Arabidopsis expresses multiple dicers that react different when the plant is
exposed to certain stresses. These reactions can be seen using RNAi silencing. • We are testing the mutant types in order to determine if RNA interference and the
silencing of certain genes in mutant plants has an effect on whether the caffeine and ethanol will affect the growth and phenotypes of the plant.
Caffeine• Central nervous system and metabolic stimulant• In humans caffeine is absorbed by the stomach and small intestine within 45
minutes• Calcium release inducer• Adding caffeine to cells causes internal calcium to be released and this affects the
permeability and organization of the membranes
BackgroundBackgroundAlcohol• Central nervous system depressant• Death is possible to humans when blood alcohol level reaches .4%• Can resist the growth of roots in plants when concentrations are above 50
mM and 100 mM How this relates to our project• Arabidopsis wild type and mutant strands (DCL4 and RDR6) have some of
the same genes that we do as humans• We wanted to see how alcohol and caffeine affects the gene expression
and the DNA expression in the plants.• translate this into the possible effects on the genes in humans
MethodsMethodsControl plants: One tray each of Wild Type, DCL4, and RDR6• Each plant is exposed to light 8 hours a day, with 16 hours a
day of dark exposure. Each plant is watered 2- 3 times a week with specially formulated fertilizer water. If time allows, we will collect the seeds from the first generation of plants and research and observe the plants they grow.
MethodsMethodsExperimental Plants: • Once again, each plant is exposed to light 8 hours a day, with 16 hours a
day of dark exposure. Each plant is watered 2- 3 times a week with specially formulated fertilizer water. If time allows, we will collect the seeds from the first generation of plants and research and observe the plants they grow.
• Caffeine: We will water the plants with their normal water as well as the stress of caffeine. The plants will be exposed to .00125 Molar, .0025 Molar, and .005 Molar solution of caffeine.
• Ethanol: We will water the plants with their normal water as well as the stress of ethanol. The strength of the ethanol solutions we expose to the plants will be 1%, 0.5%, and 0.25%.
Number of Leaves on PLants exposed to ethanolWild Type with exposure to ethanol.005M .0025M .00125M
4 4 44 4 44 4 124 4 104 4 44 4 204 16 44 9 4
Average 4 6.125 7.75Median 4 4 4Standard Deviation 0 4.35685 5.897942
RDR6 with exposure to ethanol.005M .0025M .00125M
4 13 133 10 134 15 114 4 134 12 44 4 164 4 124 10 4
Average 3.875 9 10.75Median 4 10 12.5Standard Deviation 0.353553391 4.440077 4.399675T-test 0.350616663 0.21221 0.269682
DCL4 with exposure to ethanol
.005M .0025M 0.00125M
4 2 4
4 9 12
4 4 12
4 4 11
4 4 4
4 7 14
2 4 15
4 4 12
Average 3.75 4.75 10.5
Median 4 4 12
Standard Deviation 0.707106781 2.187628 12
T-test 0.350616663 0.443001 0.303085
ObservationsEthanol• All Plants• .005 morality solution killed all the plants• very moldy and algae is growing• Plants generally have less leaves and are not as green or prickly as the control plants• Tends to amplify the characteristics of the control plants• Wild Type• Very round leaves• Uneven edges and died right away in .005 morality solution• RDR6• Lighter green• Sprouted straight up• Leaves curl under and are narrow• DCL4• Darker green• .00125 turning purple and growing alright• Curled leaves
ObservationsCaffeine• Wild Type• Not very different• Smaller• Leave ends are burning and drying out• RDR6• Look similar to a control DCL4• Long stems and leaves• Yellowing and burnt ends• DCL4• Smallest• Most dried out• Small and skinny leaves
Conclusions• Caffeine and Ethanol both have a effect on the plants, however caffeine
had a bigger effect on the phenotypes of the plant.• Caffeine seems to have stunted the growth in the diameter of the plants,
especially with the DCL4 plants.• The effects of the caffeine and ethanol could be due to the epigenome
(comprehensive biological unit that controls gene function and expression, comprised of DNA and the histone proteins) and its response to environmental factors such as the ethanol and caffeine
• The stunted growth could be due to methylated or turned off genes. The environment changes the proteins which thus turns them off.
• The bolting that we experienced on one plant is an abnormality and temperature could be a reason as to why all our other plants did not bolt.
Conclusions• A change in the environment could affect the knocked out gene in the
mutant strands, which is a possible explanation for the differences in mutants verses wild type plants.
• It could be due to mutations in dicer and risc complex in the RNAi process that then affects protein expression and thus phenotypes.
• DCL4 was hurt the most by caffeine, then wild type, and the RDR6• RDR6 could have been the least effected because of the disappearance of
tags due to the knock out gene• Wild type was most effected by ethanol, then DCL4, and lastly RDR6 again• 1% ethanol and caffeine was toxic to all plant groups• .00125 DCL4 could tolerate and this may all be due to epigenomic
differences
ThanksThanks
• Thank you to Mrs. Donley and Dr. Johansen for helping us with our research. Their help and support has allowed our project to be successful.
BibliographyBibliography• PREP Experiment Guide, Virginia Polytechnic institute & State University, Fralin Biotechnology
Center, http://www.prep.biotech.vt.edu/• PREP Classroom Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, Fralin Biotechnology Center, Virginia
Polytechnic Institute & State University, http://www.prep.biotech.vt.edu/• Role of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE4 in RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Triggered by Inverted
Repeats . Current Biology , Volume 14 , Issue 13 , Pages 1214 - 1220 D . Zilberman , X . Cao , L . Johansen , Z . Xie , J . Carrington , S . Jacobsen
• Xie Z, Johansen LK, Gustafson AM, Kasschau KD, Lellis AD, et al. (2004) Genetic and Functional Diversification of Small RNA Pathways in Plants. PLoS Biol 2(5): e104 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020104
• Chan SW, Zilberman D, Xie Z, Johansen LK, Carrington JC, Jacobsen SE. (2004) RNA silencing genes control de novo DNA methylation. Science 303, 1336.