the star cluster population of m51 · o b s e r v a tio n s arches stolte et al. 2008. n e e d f o...

30
Testing the Universality of the Stellar IMF with the E-ELT Nate Bastian (IoA) Michael Meyer (ETH Zurich) Kevin Covey (Cornell)

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Testing the Universality of the Stellar IMF with the E-ELT

    Nate Bast ian ( IoA)

    Michael Meyer (ETH Zurich)Kev in Covey (Cornell)

    Selma De Mink (Utrecht)

  • Quotes“Resorting to altering the initial mass function

    is a sign of moral weakness” Mike Edmunds

    “All problems in extragalactic astrophyics can be solved by a suitable choice of the IMF” Romeel Dave

    IMF is one of the best hopes to constrain the process of star-formation

    Nearly all stellar properties of galaxies and populations are controlled by the IMF at some level.

    “... the last refuge for scoundrels” Mike Edmunds

  • IMF: Resolved Star Approach

    ONC - VLT/ISAAC

  • IMF: Resolved Star Approach

    ONC - VLT/ISAAC

    Muench et al. 2002

    Mtot ~ 103 Msun

  • IMF: Resolved Star Approach

    high mass clusters rare -> far away -> can’t get their low mass stars

    due to stochasticity, need IMF in many clusters over the full mass range

    ONC - VLT/ISAAC

    Muench et al. 2002

    Mtot ~ 103 Msun

  • IMF: Resolved Star Approach

    high mass clusters rare -> far away -> can’t get their low mass stars

    due to stochasticity, need IMF in many clusters over the full mass range

    ONC - VLT/ISAAC

    Muench et al. 2002

    E-ELT same sensitivity as has been done for the ONC out to ~4kpc - 10-20 MJupiter

    Mtot ~ 103 Msun

  • Need for ever deeper Observations

    Arches

    Stolte et al. 2008

  • Need for ever deeper Observations

    Arches

    Stolte et al. 2008

    Kim et al. 2006

  • cluster distance (kpc) Mass (Msun) lower mass limit

    Cygnus OB2 1.7 ~104 < 20 MJupiter

    Trumpler 14 2.8 ~ 104 < 20 MJupiter

    NGC 3603 6.5 few * 104 < 0.02 Msun

    Westerlund 1 5.5 >105 < 0.02 Msun

    Arches 8 few * 104 < 0.02 Msun

    E-ELT: reaching into the substellar mass regime for all known Galactic young massive clusters

  • cluster distance (kpc) Mass (Msun) lower mass limit

    Cygnus OB2 1.7 ~104 < 20 MJupiter

    Trumpler 14 2.8 ~ 104 < 20 MJupiter

    NGC 3603 6.5 few * 104 < 0.02 Msun

    Westerlund 1 5.5 >105 < 0.02 Msun

    Arches 8 few * 104 < 0.02 Msun

    E-ELT: reaching into the substellar mass regime for all known Galactic young massive clusters

    While crowding will be an issue in the centers of the clusters, limits still possible outside the cluster cores

  • de Marchi, Paresce, & Portegies Zwart 2009, in prep.

    MC

  • de Marchi, Paresce, & Portegies Zwart 2009, in prep.

    MC

  • de Marchi, Paresce, & Portegies Zwart 2009, in prep.

    MC

    -The form of the (low mass) IMF doesn’t depend on formation epoch

  • Wyse et al. 2002

    Ursa Minor dSph

    M92

    -The form of the (low mass) IMF doesn’t depend on densityor dark matter content.

  • Wyse et al. 2002

    Ursa Minor dSph

    M92

    -The form of the (low mass) IMF doesn’t depend on densityor dark matter content.

    It has been claimed that the IMF may be dependent on the SFR density, hence it should vary with redshift.

    Local stellar clusters (ONC, Arches, NGC 3603) have SFR densities orders of magnitudes larger than high-z galaxies.

  • IMF variations in Extreme Environments

    Smith et al. 2006

  • IMF variations in Extreme Environments

    Direct detection of low mass starsPoint sources: I=20-23, K=20.5-23.5

    Smith et al. 2006

  • IMF variations in Extreme Environments

    Direct detection of low mass starsPoint sources: I=20-23, K=20.5-23.5

    need S/N > 100

    Meyer & Greissl 2005

    Smith et al. 2006

  • High Redshift Universe

    Pettini et al. 2000

    UV spectral features (CIV)

    sensitive to the shape of the high mass end of the IMF

    can compare with UV surveys of local star-forming regions

    (e.g. Pellerin 2007)

    Quider et al. 2009

  • Many Indirect Studies Report IMF Variations

    Larson 2005

    Baugh et al. 2005

    Weidner, Kroupa, Pflamm-Altenburg et al. 2006, 2007, 2009

    Wang et al. 2006

    Fardal et al. 2007

    Maness et al. 2007

    Mieske & Kroupa 2008

    Wilkins et al. 2008a,b

    Dave 2008

    Hoversten & Glazebrook 2008

    van Dokkum 2008

    Meurer et al. 2009

  • Many Indirect Studies Report IMF Variations

    Larson 2005

    Baugh et al. 2005

    Weidner, Kroupa, Pflamm-Altenburg et al. 2006, 2007, 2009

    Wang et al. 2006

    Fardal et al. 2007

    Maness et al. 2007

    Mieske & Kroupa 2008

    Wilkins et al. 2008a,b

    Dave 2008

    Hoversten & Glazebrook 2008

    van Dokkum 2008

    Meurer et al. 2009

  • Conclusions

    ❖ Many lines of evidence point to the universality of the stellar IMF.

    ❖ But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    ❖ The E-ELT will be able to refine the tests carried out so far, and search for variations in the sub-stellar regime.

  • Intermediate age clusters in the LMC

    Mackey & Brobie Neilson 2007

    ~1.5 Gyr

    V-I

    mv

  • Intermediate age clusters in the LMC

    Mackey & Brobie Neilson 2007

    ~1.5 Gyr

    V-I

    mv

  • Intermediate age clusters in the LMC

    Mackey & Brobie Neilson 2007

    ~1.5 Gyr

    300 Myr age difference

    V-I

    mv

  • V-I

    MV

    Bastian & de Mink 2009

  • 1.25 Gyr isochrone

    1.5 Gyr isochrone

    1.2 Msun

    V-I

    MV

    Bastian & de Mink 2009

  • 1.25 Gyr isochrone

    1.5 Gyr isochrone

    1.2 Msun

    V-I

    MV

    Bastian & de Mink 2009

  • 1.25 Gyr isochrone

    1.5 Gyr isochrone

    1.2 Msun

    V-I

    MV

    Bastian & de Mink 2009

    fast rotators

    slow rotators

  • Outline

    ❖ Stellar IMF in starbursts and the early universe

    ❖ Multiple populations within clusters?

    ❖ Resolved star approach

    ❖ Universality of the IMF?

    Stellar IMF in the Galaxy

    Extreme environments